Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The table data illustrates the proportion of students who gave good ratings to various aspects of a
university in three different years - 2005, 2010 and 2015.
HOMEWORK
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of students who gave good ratings to five different aspects of the
university were comparatively higher in 2015 than previous years with the exception of the range of modules
offered by the university.
HOMEWORK
There was a sharp increase in the number of students giving these services a good rating, particularly in the
first five years: from 54 percent in 2005, to 81 percent in 2010, and 95 percent in 2015. There was also an
overall improvement in ratings for teaching quality, though the increase was relatively small (74 percent in
2005 rising to 78 percent in 2015) and there was a decline in the interim (72 percent in 2010). There was
also a fluctuation in attitudes to library resources, rising from 86 percent to 88 percent in the first five years
and then falling by one percent in 2015
HOMEWORK
Good ratings for the university’s sports and social facilities were identical throughout, at 65 percent. Finally,
there were poor ratings at the beginning of the period for the range of modules offered (39 percent in 2005)
and they got worse, falling steadily to 31 percent in 2010 and 25 percent in 2015.
COMPARISON
BAR
CHART (NO
TIMELINE)
The bar chart below demonstrates the various types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in
2010. Summarize the facts by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Divide by groups
• Groups of subjects (in vertical axis)
• Groups of columns (elements/factors/…)
This bar chart illustrates different kinds of holiday
accommodations selected by people in the United
Kingdom in 2010.
I. Introduction
I. Introduction
II. Overview
III. Body 1
This was followed by the figure for USA with 4099 billion
Kwh produced and 3866 billion Kwh consumed
IV. Body 2
The pie charts illustrate the percentages of energy produced in France in two
years 1995 and 2005.
OVERVIEW
2 sentences:
- Trend
- Order
Ex 2: The demand of everyday life makes up 21% of the total need of paper
BODY
BODY 1: 1995
BODY 1: In 1995
In 1995, Coal’s production accounted
for the highest proportion, at 29.80%
of the total energy production in
France, while the rates of Gas and
Petro produced were slightly lower, at
29.63% and 29.27% respectively. By
contrast, the lowest proportion with
only 4.90% of the total production
belonged to other energy .
BODY
BODY 2: In 2005
- 1st sentence: Coal – grew and
remained the highest – 30.93%
- 2nd sentence: Gas + Nuclear
witnessed a rise – 30.31% +
10.10% >< Petro – decreased -
19.55%
- 3rd sentence: Other –remained the
lowest – 9.10%
BODY
BODY 2: In 2005
In 2005, the percentage of Coal witnessed an
slight growth and remained the highest
figure in the chart, at 30.93%. The figure for
Gas and Nuclear rose slowly to 30.31% and
10.10% respectively, while Petro’s production
experienced a dramatic fall of nearly 10% to
only 19.55%. Other types of energy
accounted for 9.10% and remained the
lowest part of all.
Sample The pie charts compare the production of various types of energy in
France in two years 1995 and 2005
There was a rise in almost all kinds of energy production with the
exception of Petro. The percentage of Coal produced was highest in
both years. Meanwhile, the figure for Other types of energy was by
far the lowest.
In 1995, Coal’s production accounted for the highest proportion, at
29.80% of the total energy production in France, while the rates of
Gas and Petro produced were slightly lower, at 29.63% and 29.27%
respectively. By contrast, the lowest proportion with only 4.90% of
the total production belonged to other energy.
In 2005, the percentage of Coal witnessed an insignificant growth and
remained the highest figure in the chart, at 30.93%. The figure for Gas
and Nuclear rose slowly to 30.31% and 10.10% respectively, while
Petro’s production experienced a dramatic fall of nearly 10% to only
19.55%. Other types of energy accounted for 9.10% and remained the
lowest part of all
STRUCTURE
The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010.
HOMEWORK 2
The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008
and 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
where relevant. Write at least 150 words.