Staffing Global Organizations The polycentric approach
PROS CONS
Alleviates cultural Limits career mobility
myopia Isolates headquarters It is inexpensive to from foreign implement subsidiaries Staffing Global Organizations The geocentric approach
PROS CONS
Uses human resources National immigration
efficiently policies may limit implementation Helps build strong culture and informal It is expensive to management network implement Staffing Global Organizations The regiocentric approach
PROS CONS
Less cost is incurred National immigration
policies may limit implementation No challenge in culture and language High cost of implementation Allows interaction between managers that Highly centralized control are transferred to the of staffing is required regional headquarters Global Staffing Methods The Ethnocentric Approach
PROS CONS
Overcomes lack of Produces resentment in
qualified managers in host country host country Can lead to cultural Helps transfer core myopia competencies
Unified culture Competencies For Global Recruits Stress tolerance
Experience working internationally
Language skills
Diverse cultural experiences
Pre-departure Onboarding Opportunities
Nuances about culture and history
Politics of the country
Finding a place to live
Buying a car and rules of the road
Repatriation Policies Send the right people abroad
Support the expats family
Challenges of repatriation
Management plan on repatriation challenges
U.S. Employment Laws Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act
(ADEA).
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The Uniformed Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). References Collings, D. G., & Scullion, H. (2012). Global staffing. In Handbook of Research in International Human Resource Management, Second Edition. Edward Elgar Publishing. Valk, R., Van der Velde, M., Van Engen, M., & Godbole, R. (2014). International career motives, repatriation and career success of Indian women in Science & Technology. Journal of Global Mobility.