Family The theme I chose is family.

The reason I chose this theme is simple, because everyone has a

family. I do not agree with the statement that same-sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children in the
question. I just want to ask, why not? Next, I will explain my point of view from three aspects. First of all, I think
this is a form of discrimination in itself. I think such permission will make me feel that the same-sex group is inferior
in people's eyes. Why same-sex couples are treated differently from opposite-sex couples. In my opinion, same-sex
couples are as careful and responsible as heterosexual couples, and even they will be more attentive, and if they
have the ability to adopt children, I think this is a good behavior and is worthy of praise. The second point is that
there are many abandoned children. Rather than let them grow up in a cold environment, it is better to be adopted.
There are too many single-parent families in real life. I think same-sex couples are at least more suitable for taking
care of children than such single parents. In addition, those children who have not been adopted by heterosexual
partners can only grow up alone in the orphanage? The third point is that same-sex couples also need affection.
They may be opposed by their elders and ridiculed by their relatives and friends. Are we still going to obliterate this
adopted father-son or mother-son affection? I think that if someone feel that there is something wrong with adopting
a child by same-sex couples, it is better for the government or relevant departments to conduct regular inspections
to ensure that their lives are harmonious. Therefore, in summary, I believe that same-sex couples have the right to
adopt children
family The theme I chose is family. The reason I chose this theme is simple, because everyone has a family.
Regarding the question of whether parents can do Physical punishment to their children, I think it is better not to so.
Next, I will explain my point of view from three aspects. First Physical punishment is not good for the child's physical
and mental health. We can't control the strength that children can bear. Hitting a child can easily cause harm to the
child and may even cause disability. In addition, the children's hearts are also very fragile, and we cannot estimate
how much psychological harm we will cause them. And there are many ways to educate children. We can adopt more
appropriate methods. For example, if the parents can correctly guide the children when they make mistakes, it will be
more effective than punishment. The second point is that Physical punishment is not conducive to the development of
children's character. Children's learning ability is very strong, and they may think that violence is the best way to
solve problems. This kind of consequence is terrible. In the long run, they may use the same way to deal with friends,
family , and even their children. The third point is that Physical punishment may arouse children's rebellious
psychology. In China, children are often beaten by their parents because our country does not have relevant laws to
prevent parents from beating their children. Many elementary or middle school students will have a rebellious
mentality. They may run away from home or choose to end their lives in other ways. Because they are still very young,
they don't know how to cherish life. Therefore, I think Physical punishment is not a good way to deal with problems.
We should use other methods to guide, otherwise it may harm the children
family My theme of choice is family. The reason I chose this theme is simple, because everyone has a
family. I cannot agree with the idea that women should stay at home and take care of their children. It's already
2021, why does anyone have this idea? Next, I will explain my point of view from three aspects. The first is that
everyone is equal, and both men and women have the obligation to take care of their children. First of all, I admit
that the mother of the child is more suitable for taking care of the child, because she may be more attentive and
considerate. But I think taking care of children is not only the mother ’s job, but also the father ’s. The father can
teach the children something that the mother does not notice. For example, how to face difficulties bravely, how
to exercise one's body and so on. The second point is that I think women should not stay at home all the time. I
think a woman should also go out to work appropriately, because if she stays at home all the time, she will
gradually become disconnected from society, and many new problems will appear in the family. For example,
husband and wife have no common topics to talk about. It is very difficult to find a job again after being out of
touch with society. The third point, I think we should gradually change some outdated concepts, such as women
need to take care of their children at home, women need to wash and cook, and so on. The times are advancing,
and the development of these decades has changed the structure of men and women in society. Women can
work as well as men. Men are also obligated to contribute to the housework and family. Therefore, in summary, I
do not agree with the view that women should stay at home and take care of their children.
family The theme I chose is family. The reason I chose this theme is simple, because everyone has a
family. Regarding the issue of surrogacy /ˈsʌrəɡəsi/ involved in the topic, I think it should not be generalized. I
think surrogacy is not suitable, but it also has its meaning. Next, I will explain my point of view from these two
aspects. on the one hand, the project of surrogacy/ˈsʌrəɡəsi/ is meaningful. For example, for people without
fertility, their desire to have children can be realized through surrogacy. I think there is no immorality in surrogacy
for this compelling reason. On the contrary, I think this kind of project is very meaningful, it belongs to an
advanced medical technology, and it will also make many families happier and harmonious. On the other hand, I
am opposed to surrogacy/ˈsʌrəɡəsi/ that is done for profit. For example, same-sex couples and those who just
don't want to change their body shape and choose surrogacy. For same-sex couples, if they want children, they
can adopt the way of adoption. I did not discriminate against them, because they have the courage to stand up
and face everyone, so they should be prepared to face reality. It is even more difficult for me to accept that those
who surrogacy just dont want to change body shape. I think this kind of surrogacy behaviors are not only
immoral/ɪˈmɒrəl/, they may also leave hidden dangers for them to abandon the child in the future, because they
may feel that they are more important than the child. Once a child is abandoned, this topic is much more than just
a moral condemnation. Therefore, in summary, I think it is advisable to use surrogacy reasonably and legally to
solve the problem of fertility, but it should be forbad for those unethical surrogacy for profit.
family The theme I chose is family. The reason I chose this theme is simple, because everyone has a
family. Regarding what the title says , grandparents should be given the legal right to visit their grandchildren. I
think this is as it should be. Next, I will explain my point of view from two aspects. First of all, as I just
mentioned, I think it is natural for grandparents to have the right to visit their grandchildren. I don't know the
situation in Europe, but in China, many children grew up with their grandparents. Because the child’s parents
need to go to work, the child’s grandparents will take the child home to look after or move in to live with the child
and the child’s parent. So grandparents are the same to their children as their parents. Grandparents do not
need to be empowered to visit their grandchildren. The second point is that I think the elderly need company. As
we grow older, the people around us become more and more busy. We have the opportunity to make new friends
when we go to school and work, but for our grandparents There are few friends and their children are busy with
work. They need company. They may be able to see the shadow of their children from their grandchildren. For
grandchildren, they may also like to get along with their grandparents, because these are people who love them
unconditionally. And getting along with grandparents can make children's lives more complete. They can feel
the affection that is different from the love of father and mother. Therefore, I think grandparents should be given
the legal rights to visit their grandchildren .
family The theme I chose is family. The reason I chose this theme is simple, because everyone has a
family. It is reasonable for the court to decide the custody and visitation rights of pets by the divorced parties
mentioned in the title. With the improvement of living standards, pets have been regarded by people as their
own children. Therefore, for this topic, it is equivalent to whether the right of custody and visitation of the
children of both parties after the divorce is reasonable or not determined by the court. I think it is reasonable.
Next, I will explain my point of view from two aspects. First of all, I think the law on children's issues after
divorce is well established, so we can trust the court's decision. After a divorce, one or both parties always do
not want to be disturbed, so unnecessary disputes /dɪˈspjuːts/ should be avoided. Forcustody and visitation
rights, it is better to be determined by law. Although it is possible that the pet has a better relationship with
the other party, but he will not be able to take care of the pet better in the future if he divorces due to alcohol
or drug abuse. Second point. I think there is another advantage to being determined by the law, because the
law is fair, and you can file a lawsuit even if you don’t accept the result. The judge will naturally make a
decision based on your situation. Judges are more objective and fairer than our friends or ourselves, and
those who are usually outsiders analyze things more clearly. Therefore, in summary, I very much agree that
the custody and visitation rights of pets after divorce should be determined by the court.
family I chose my theme as family. The reason I chose this theme is very simple, because everyone
has a family. I agree with the statement in the title: "Children should have the right to choose religion or not to
believe in religion". Next, I will explain my views from three aspects. First of all, everyone has the right to
choose religion or believe in religion. Shouldn't religion be free to choose and believe in? The compulsory
religion is a cult/kʌlt/ in my opinion. The second point is that I don’t think we have the right to arrange children.
We have no right to help them make choices. They may be very young now, and they still don't understand what
religion is, or what religious beliefs are. But they will always grow up, and when they grow up, they will be
willing to feel which religion they believe in or not. It is inhumane /ˌɪnhjuːˈmeɪn/ to stifle /ˈstaɪfl/ children’s
choices from an early age. There should be no such thing as forcing others to make choices or forcibly choosing
for others in a just religious belief. The third point is that I think religious freedom is important. Religion is
originally a kind of belief and it is sacred. It should not participate in vicious competition. It can be promoted ,
but it must not be forced to let others choose it. I think this is not only a disrespect for human rights, but it also
degrades religion. Parents should correctly guide their children's choices, not substitute them for their choices,
so that children can grow up healthily, which is the correct way to educate children. Therefore, in summary, I
think children should have the right to choose religion or not to believe in religion
family The theme I chose is family. The reason I chose this theme is simple, because everyone has a
family. Regarding the topic: "Biology does not necessarily make you a good parent ." I agree with it. Next, I will
explain my point of view from two aspects. First of all, I think it is not necessarily that a man is a good father and
a woman is a good mother. Because for being a parent, psychological /ˌsaɪkəˈlɒdʒɪkl/ maturity is far more
important than physical maturity. Because when children are young, they need the care of their parents and their
protection during the growth process. Therefore, only a mature inner person can be a good parent. Of course, men
may be more attentive than women, and women may also be more careful. This brings me to my second point. I
don’t think it’s not necessarily that only male and female couples can be good parents. Same-sex couples can also
be good parents. For example, those same-sex couples who adopt children have complementary personalities,
take care of their children in every possible way, and can raise their children well. In this kind of relationship, there
is always a man who plays the role of a mother, and there is always a woman who plays the role of a father.
Although their biological sex is different from the role they play, this does not prevent them from becoming good
parents,Whether you can be a good parent is determined by your psychology and character. Therefore, in
summary, I agree with this view:Biology does not necessarily make you a good parent.
• What are some of your fondest childhood memories? My mom bought me a baked sweet potato with the money she spent on clothes. She hadn't
bought new clothes for a long time by then, and it was already winter

• What values would you teach your children? • What is the most important value your parents taught you?

One should be kind to those who have been hurt by life, that is, those who have suffered in life.For example, beggars, refugees, disabled people.•
Which major changes have taken place concerning family structure in recent years?

• Is our world view irrevocably shaped by our upbringing?

I don't think so. I think as we grow up or as our surroundings change our worldview changes. For example, when I was a child, I was envious of
o t h e r s w h o c o u l d b u y l u x u r y / ˈ l ʌ k ʃ ə r i / g o o d s , s u c h a s LV, f e n d i , e t c . B u t w h e n I g r o w u p I n o l o n g e r e n v y o t h e r s w h o h a v e a b e t t e r l i f e t h a n m e . I
think what suits you is the best. The money earned with their own hands to spend money to be more comfortable. And the views on homosexuality I
c o u l d n ' t i m a g i n e w h a t i t w o u l d b e l i k e f o r t h e m t o b e t o g e t h e r b e f o r e I c a m e t o G e r m a n y. B u t a f t e r I c a m e h e r e , I m e t a l o t o f p e o p l e , b o t h i n r e a l
life and on the internet. I think they are very normal, just like us. They shouldn't be discriminated against. I feel stupid for thinking that way
before.

• Do you agree that the increasing divorce rate is not altogether negative? If so, what are the positive sides to divorce?

I think the increase in divorce rate is directly related to the improvement of women's status. It has to be said that women are still more or less
disadvantaged in marital relationships. In the past, they may not dare to file for divorce, and they may have to put up with domestic violence. But
n o w, w o m e n ' s s t a t u s i s b e i n g t a k e n m o r e a n d m o r e s e r i o u s l y, a n d g e n d e r e q u a l i t y h a s l o n g b e e n a h o t t o p i c o f d i s c u s s i o n , s o t h e i n c r e a s e d
divorce rate may

• Can you see any positive aspects regarding arranged marriages? Parents feel much more experienced than we do. Therefore they may be
better at choosing than we are. They will certainly be wiser than we are. Perhaps families whose parents arrange marriages are less likely
to divorce. Because parents are also a big factor in young people getting divorced

• Polygamy and Polyandry are natural phenomena and should be legalized.

Unequal status of men and women. Discrimination between men and women. We have made a lot of efforts to equalize/ˈiːkwəlaɪz/ the
status of men and women, and such efforts should not be broken by such discriminatory rules

• Smoking or drinking alcohol during pregnancy should be punished. We have to be responsible for our children. If we don't even treat our
c h i l d r e n w e l l a t t h i s t i m e , w e w i l l h a v e b i g g e r p r o b l e m s i n t h e p a r e n t - c h i l d r e l a t i o n s h i p l a t e r. S u c h a s a b a n d o n m e n t , a b u s e , e t c .

• How do you feel about celebrities adopting children from the African continent?

These children can also grow up to work towards building a better Africa. It creates a virtuous circle.

• M a r r i a g e i s o u t d a t e d i n t o d a y ’ s s o c i e t y. n o I t h i n k m a r r i a g e i s s t i l l v e r y i m p o r t a n t . W i t h m a r r i a g e c o m e s f a m i l y, a n d w i t h f a m i l y c o m e s a
harmonious life, a good routine or a lively and lovely child . 一个人很难，两个人相互支撑。

• Once they have reached a certain age, children should be allowed to choose their own names if they are