Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure I.
Mainstreaming
Matrix of Thematic
Concerns into the
Local Planning
Process
ABOUT THE GUIDE
This Illustrative guide is part of the enhancement
to the CDP Guidebook.
• A toolkit for the review of the form, process and content of the
CDP for the purpose of enhancing the relevance and
responsiveness of the CDP to local needs and to strengthen
alignment and complementation with Provincial and National-level
plans;
Figure III.
Relationship of
City/Municipal
Plans
(Source: CDP
Guidebook, chart
based on the
original design of
Prof. Ernesto
Serote)
THE ENHANCED CDP CYCLE
CDP PREPARATION STEPS
• The CDP Illustrative Guide clustered the steps in the
planning cycle into five (5) major steps, namely:
• The RaPIDS is a tool developed under the LGU PFM 2 Project that
aims to guide local planners in identifying development indicators
that specifically applies to their LGU’s needs and characteristics.
• RaPIDS still follow the principles of the LDIS which is based on the
LGU’s Vision and success indicators.
• It also has specific indicators that LGUs may need should they have
particular development thrusts such as indicators for tourism
development and indicators that can help LGUs identify PPAs to make
themselves more business-friendly.
Prepare Ecological Profile and Structured List (Step 3)
Rationalized Planning Indicator and Data Set (RaPIDS)
Prepare Local Development Investment Program (Step 4)
• The LDIP should have a time frame of three (3) years. Its annual
component is what is referred to as the Annual Investment Program
(AIP). The preparation of the LDIP is mentioned as one of the basis
for the budget document in the Department of Budget and
Management’s (DBM) Budget Operations Manual (BOM) for Local
Government Units.
Stream 1
Stream 2
Prioritization of PPAs using
tools (CCC, Urgency Test, New Investment Financing The LTO will
Resource Impact and GAM Potential (Net amount of Revenue provide the
Analysis) Revenue Forecast
Forecast minus Forward Estimates of
Planning Team & LDC for 6 years and the
Expenditures)
LBO will provide
the corresponding
Ranked List of forward estimates
PPAs Local Resource Mobilization of expenditures to
Conservative Program (LRMP) (Additional Funds net out the New
Approach – cut the from improved Fiscal Management) investment
list of PPAs to work Financing
within the New Developmental Potential
Investment Approach – find
Financing Potential other sources of LFC + LDC
only funds
Stream 3
Matched?
Investment
YES
Programming
(January-June
If a match has been made, the LPDC
07 of ensuing 3-Year Local Development prepares LDIP with its corresponding
year) Investment Program (LDIP) RMP and/or Financing options to be
approved by the LDC and endorsed to the
Sanggunian for adoption
Annual Investment Program LPDC prepares the AIP (annual
(AIP) slice of the LDIP) for approval by
the LDC and submits to the
Sanggunian for adoption
Annual Budget
Budgeting
(June – December of
every year)
Prepare needed implementation instruments (Step 5)
Attachments
A. Integrated Planning Process with Local Special Bodies and Advisory Councils
– a policy paper on integrating parallel planning processes into the Local
Development Planning Process such as the BuB and the KALAHI-CIDDS
B. Required Templates for CDP Preparation-list of forms that is needed for CDP
preparation which will also be reviewed in the CDP Review Guide
C. RaPIDS Indicators Excel File-list of updated data set and indicators for CDP
preparation
• Determine the alignment of the Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan
(PDPFP) and Provincial Development Investment Program (PDIP) with regards to:
o Development goals, objectives and strategies
o Physical framework o Investment program
• Assess adherence of the preparation process, and content of the CDP submission vis-à-
vis the requirements of policy based budgeting as embodied in DILG’s guidelines.
• Establish a measure for the future qualification and provision of performance grants
and other support and assistance from the National Government.
The CDP Review Guide (Additional Chapters and Tools)
• The initial intention was for the Provincial Development Council (PDC) with the
Provincial Planning and Development Office (PPDO) acting as technical
secretariat to review the CDPs.
• For now, a policy will be issued for the DILG Regional Office to have an initial
review according to FORM compliance only
The CDP Review Guide (Additional Chapters and Tools)
• Form Review - to ensure that the submitted CDP documents are complete (i.e. there are
no missing pages and all the tables, maps and graphs are clear and in place) and determine
whether the draft CDP conforms to the structure and sequence described in the CDP
Guidelines, and with other minimum form requirements.
• Content Review - to assess the substance and logic of the CDP submission with
emphasis on the clarity, comprehensiveness, and quality of various components of the
planning and investment programming processes. • The individual results of the process
and content reviews are the bases for feedback and for revising or augmenting the CDP
submission, if necessary.
form
Form No.
Yes -
Forms and Documents Other Acceptable Remarks
No - X
Forms
A Forms
Sample Harmonized Workplan for the Form 1b
Preparation of Comprehensive Land Use Plan
1 Workplan / Activity
(CLUP) and Comprehensive Development Plan
Design
(CDP)
Form 1c
Ecological Profile
Socio-Economic
2
Profile (SEP) / Special
Reference Years: ____________
Sectoral Studies
Form 1d
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS) / Narrative Analysis of
3 Rationalized Planning and Indicator Data Set LDI Matrix subsumed
(RaPIDS) in the SEP or
Ecological Profile
Form 2a
Structured List of Programs, Projects and Other document
4
Activities (PPAs) per Sector (Long List) indicating identified
PPAs
Form 3b
Project Profile
(includes project title,
5 Project Briefs for Each PPA brief description, cost,
beneficiaries,
timeframe, location,
and project proponent)
CLUP-CDP Interface
VISION ELABORATION SPECIFICATION
OF ENDS OF MEANS
Element PHYSICAL PLANNING SPATIAL
Descriptors GOALS CLUP STRATEGIES
LOCATION
Success PRINCIPLES
Indicators
Settlement
C D P Protection
VISION –
Production
REALITY SECTORAL SECTORAL
GAP GOALS OBJECTIVES Infrastructure
CURRENT
REALITY
Whatever it What can be DEVELOPMENT
takes to reasonably Policies
• Ecological
close the done in 3 Strategies
Profile
• Statistical gap years Programs
Compendium Projects
• Thematic Maps Legislations
form
Form No.
Yes -
Forms and Documents Other Acceptable Remarks
No - X
Forms
Form 3a
6 Ranked List of PPAs with Cumulative Cost Workshop outputs of
ranking exercise
Form 3c
Any document
7 Projection of New Investment Financing Potential containing projection
of total revenue,
expenditure, and
surplus
Form 5b
Other document
11 Priority Legislative Requirements Form
indicating priority
legislative
requirements
Form 6b
1 Economic Sector
2 Social Sector
3 Environment Sector
4 Institutional Sector
5 Physical/Infrastructure
B Quality of PPAs
PPAs are responsive to the issues, problems, and gaps as made
1
evident in the ecological profile and LDIS.
Yes -
Criteria Remarks
No - X
C Alignment with CLUP and Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan (PDPFP)
The plans and programs of the city/municipality are harmonized
1
or consistent with the CLUP.
The vision, mission and goals of the LGU are aligned with the
2 vision, mission and goals of the Province as provided in the
PDPFP.
Submission Feedback of
Submission
of CDP and Initial Initial
of Additional
Other Review Review to
Documents*
Documents C/MDC
CDP Review Committee C/MDC to amend the CDP PDC submits to C/MDC the CDP Review Committee
to review the amended as may be required by the overall recommendations and conducts actual evaluation
CDP within five (5) Review Committee within findings of the assessment of the CDP within ten (10)
working days after the thirty (30) working days three (3) working days after working days after receipt
receipt of the amended after the receipt of the the conduct of the actual of the additional documents
CDP overall assessment evaluation as may be required by the
Review Committee
Timelines