5 + 5 Multi-Stakeholder Planning

Process

Working together towards a common

objective with an integrated plan

Oct 27th 2009

5 + 5 Chair Dr. Ahmed Saeed

 Introduction
• I. Validating Priorities
Description of the 5+5 process of prioritisation
• II. Relating 5+5 to Strategic Objectives
How the 5+5 addresses government and donor
strategies
• III. Outputs of the 5+5
An illustration of programmatic priority
recommendations
 5+5 Process of Prioritisation
Geographical prioritisation by strategic issues:

1. Conflict & Stability

2. Integration (police & civil service gaps)

3. Development Needs Ranking
Conflict & Stability Prioritisation
8 Priority
Dilling
Localities

Lagawa Rashad
Dalami
5 First Priority
Heiban
3 Second Priority
UNMIS Sector
Abyei -Muglad Keilak
Al Buram IV Conflict
Reporting
 5+5 conflict & stability prioritisation Vs
Strategic Objectives

• Government Objectives – Security & Stability,

Reconciliation, Unity & Cohesion in the state.
• Donor Objectives – Flashpoint Strategy.
Integration Prioritisation

Government
Objective: Dalami
Security &
Dilling
Donor Objective:
Stability -
Lagawa Heiban Integrate Former
Institutional
SPLM Areas
capacity
UNMIS Sector IV
building, Um Dorein
Analysis of Civil Service
&removal of the
Police Coverage
affects of war,
selected areas
project
5+5 Development needs prioritisation

16
23
27 32
29
35 Sector Leads
33 and Partner
33 Ministry Rank
33
Each Priority
Locality
According to
Need
 5+5 Development priorities Vs Strategic
Objectives

• Government – Poverty Reduction,

Roads/water, Removal of the Affects of War,
• Donor – Peace Dividend, Increase State
Government Capacities to Lead Recovery &
Development.
 Summary of Prioritisation
• 8 Localities prioritised through conflict and
integration lens
• From these 8 priority localities, priority sectors
for each locality have been defined and project
activities are being formed to address these
priorities for the next 3/6/18 month windows.
• To illustrate the outputs will present details for
two priority localities.
 Lagawa Locality
Proposed 3 Month Priority Interventions
1. Conflict & Stability Priority
1. Locality
Tabag Water Yard

. Integration
2. 2Two Priority
Water Points between Abu
Junuk & Al Arak
3. Critical Sectoral Gaps
3. in
AbuEducation;
Junuk HighPeace
School
Building; Protection;
Tabag
4. Health; WASH;Between
Reconciliation Food
Security
Kamda & Livelihood.
and Tulushi 2
Water
Large nomadic
5.4.Strengthen Policing Sources
community
Al Buram Locality
Proposed Priority Interventions
1. Conflict & Stability Priority

1.2. Capacity
Integration Priority
Building for New
3. Localities
One of the New Localities
– particularly those
in strategic priority areas.
2. Reconciliation Conferences &
Activities for the whole area,
particularly between Shatt
and Dageig Group.
3. CPA Dissemination
 Summary
Next Steps
Successes
Complete the process and address the gaps in a
 Priority Driven & Strategic
structured manner to produce precise action plan
 Collaborative & Consultative Effort
 Positive Process Begun
Gaps
 Need to be more Specific in existing and proposed
activities
 Not all Issues Included
 Ad Hoc
 Thank you

Questions, Comments, & Discussion.