FACULTY OF ECONOMICS

UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG

PICEEBA7 2021

New Normal; Opportunities and

Challenges in the Learning
Process during Covid 19
Pandemic
By
SYAMWIL
Economics Education Study Program of FE UNP
 Background
A Brief History of Economics Education Studi Program of
Faculty of Economics of Universitas Negeri Padang (EESP FE
UNP)
1. PTPG Batusangkar (1954 - 1956) with 6 departments-
Economic, History, English, Indonesian, Science and
Biology;
2. FKIP Unand Bukittinggi at Batusangkar (1956 - 1958)
3. FKIP Unand Padang (1958 - 1964)
4. IKIP Jakarta filial Padang (1964 - 1965) with 4 faculties and
Economics in FKPS faculty
5. IKIP Padang (1964 - 1965) with 5 Faculties and 14
Departments and Economics in FPIPS faculty
6. Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) (1999 - now); EESP in FE
UNP
Background
As the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has
spread across the globe, every institution has to
respond to:
1. Education bodies,

2. Governments,

3. Society,

4. Restaurants and recreation areas,

5. Health care (hospitals),

6. etc

All of these sectors have to find out the solution

for this pandemics
3
Rasional
 The COVID-19 pandemic is a challenge and
an opportunity as well to improve the quality
of education
 A transition of the learning process from
classical (face to face) to the virtual one
 Any activity should be done in new normal
rules by applying health protocols.
The 5M Health Protocols to
Prevent COVID-19 are:

 Hand washing
Semester
 Putting on a mask Jan – Jun 2020
 Maintaining Distance
Semester
 Staying Away from the Crowds Jul – Dec 2020

 Reducing Mobility Semester

Jan – Jun 2021

The last one we call New Normal

The learning activities have to be done by
obeying the protocols above.
Research Problem

 How are the learning process activities

conducted in COVID 19 pandemics in the New
Normal at the EESP FE UNP to reach the aims?
Underlying principles
 Teaching Strategy:
PAIKEM Learning Process is used learning experience. The
abbreviation stand for P Practice, A Active, I
Innovative, K Creative, E Effective and M Fun learning
process
 Assessment of Performance:
Balance Scorecard (BSC) modified are used to description
and analyze the result; they are Financial, Customers,
Internal business process and Learning and Growth.
 BSC for PAIKEM
is modified into 10 attributes. They are material, media,
books, method, discussion, task, feedback, efficiency,
affectivity, and competency. All attributes become the
indicator of the PAIKEM learning process
Methods
 Survey was done in EESP-FE UNP
 Activities took place at some classroom sessions in
EESP-FE UNP in semester Jan-Jun 2020, Jul-Dec
2020; and Jan-Jun 2021
 Sample was selected by the researcher’s judgment
 The data were collected by using interval
measurement likert scale.
 The questionnaire was developed by 10 indicators
for every attribute of PAIKEM. The students were also
encouraged to write their comments about the online
learning process at the space given in the
questionnaire.
 The data were analyzed using the modified BSC
 The result is explained descriptively
Teaching aids and material
Learning activities in semester January-June 2020.
1. The classical classroom materials and activities
were transferred to online learning using the
lesson plans that had been prepared at the
beginning of the semester because COVID 19
pandemics
 EESP FE UNP
Recapitulation of Grand Mean (GM) and Percentage
In Semester January-June 2020
LEARNING TOTAL in GM TOTAL in PERCENTAGE
No
ACTIVITIES ONLINE OFFLINE AVERAGE ONLINE OFFLINE AVERAGE
1 Practice 30.55 40.88 35.71 61.09 81.75 71.42
2 Active 31.66 41.67 36.66 63.31 83.34 73.33
3 Innovative 31.61 40.38 35.99 63.22 80.75 71.98
4 Creative 31.94 41.05 36.49 63.88 82.09 72.98
5 Effective 32.22 41.48 36.85 64.44 82.97 73.70
6 Fun 30.89 41.38 36.13 61.78 82.75 72.27
  Average 31.48 41.14 36.31 62.95 82.28 72.61

EESP FE UNP
Recapitulation in Percentage
Result of 100
Jan-Jun 2020
Survey 80
Online
60
Offline
40 Average
20

0
Practice Active Innovative Creative Effective Fun Average
Teaching aids and material

Learning activities in semester July-December

2020.
1. The lesson plan was prepared in the beginning
of semester
2. The teaching media, such ppt. and exercises
and problem were sent to the students weekly
3. Discussions were done if the students needed
more information about the material
 EESP FE UNP
Recapitulation of Grand Mean (GM)and Percentage
In Semester July - December 2020
LEARNING TOTAL in GM TOTAL in PERCENTAGE
No ACTIVITIES ONLINE OFFLINE AVERAGE ONLINE OFFLINE AVERAGE
1 Practice 33.25 41.14 37.19 66.50 82.27 74.39
2 Active 34.00 42.20 38.10 68.00 84.41 76.20
3 Innovative 33.39 41.00 37.19 66.77 82.00 74.39
4 Creative 34.39 41.34 37.86 68.77 82.68 75.73
5 Effective 34.32 42.11 38.22 68.64 84.23 76.43
6 Fun 33.23 42.02 37.63 66.45 84.05 75.25
  Average 33.76 41.64 37.70 67.52 83.27 75.40

Result of EESP FE UNP

Recapitulation in Percentage
Survey Jan-Jun 2020
100
80
Online
60
Offline
40
Average
20
0
Practice Active Innovative Creative Effective Fun Average
Teaching aids and material
Learning activities in semester January-June
2021.
1. The lesson plan was in the beginning of
semester
2. The teaching media, such ppt. and exercises
and problem were sent to the students weekly
3. The discussion were every class meeting
(time)
4. The materials (e-books) used by the lectures
were sent to the students at the beginning of
semester.
 EESP FE UNP
Recapitulations of Grand Mean (GM) and Percentage
In Semester January-June 2021
LEARNING TOTAL in GM TOTAL in PERCENTAGE
No ACTIVITIES
ONLINE OFFLINE AVERAGE ONLINE OFFLINE AVERAGE
1Practice 36.47 41.69 39.08 72.94 83.38 78.16
2Active 37.97 42.69 40.33 75.94 85.38 80.66
3Innovative 37.41 41.88 39.64 74.81 83.75 79.28
4Creative 37.50 42.28 39.89 75.00 84.56 79.78
5Effective 38.28 42.53 40.41 76.56 85.06 80.81
6Fun 37.59 42.53 40.06 75.19 85.06 80.13
  Average 37.54 42.27 39.90 75.07 84.53 79.80

Result of EESP FE UNP

Survey Recapitulation in Percentage
Jan-Jun 2020
90

85
Online
80
Offline
75
Average
70

65
Practice Active Innovative Creative Effective Fun Average
Result of
Survey
EESP FE UNP
Recapitulation in Percentage attributes
Jan-Jun20, Jul-Dec 20 & Jan-Jun21
90.00

80.00

70.00

60.00 Practice
Active
50.00 Innovative
Creative
40.00
Effective

30.00 Fun
Average
20.00

10.00

-
Jan-Jun20 Jul-Dec20 Jan-Jun21 Average Jan-Jun20 Jul-Dec20 Jan-Jun21 Average

Online -- offline

Result of EESP FE UNP
Survey Rekapitulation in Total Average Percentage
Period for 3 semester
Description Online Offline Average
Jan-Jun 20 63 82 73
Jul-Dec 20 68 83 75
Jan-Jun 21 75 85 80
Average 69 84 76

EESP FE UNP
Recapitulation in Total Average Percentage
100
Jan-Jun20, Jul-Dec20 & Jan-Jun21
80 Online
60 Offline
Average
40

20

0
Jan-Jun 20 Jul-Dec 20 Jan-Jun 21 Average
Conclusion
1. Classical learning activities were better than the
online one in all aspects of PAIKEM Strategic
2. Online learning became better gradually whenever
the learning activities were engaging
3. Significant improvement was evident through online
learning whenever the students were engaged
4. Students’ Problems in online learning were:
a. Unstable internet connection
b.Limited internet coverage
c. Limitation of data (insufficient credit balanced)
d.Not sufficient hardware to access the teaching material
e. Low English language ability
Suggestions
1. Use Flip Classroom strategy and Blended
Learning
2. Synchronous meetings are used for
discussions, while theoretical materials are
read by the students independently
3. Students are the subjects and lecturers
become the facilitators
4. Lecturers need to prepare instructional media
such as videos or ppt. with audio explanation
 Learning Activities by
PAIKEM & BSC Strategy Model
School Parent

Teaching
aids
Teacher
(Manager Learning
of learning)
Process-
Flip&Blended
Aims, goals
Strategic & objectives

Student Material

Government Continuous improvement of Society

19

learning process
20