Tornadoes: Nature’s Most

Violent Storms
 INTRODUCTION

Tornadoes are some of the most

destructive forces of nature.
 INTRODUCTION
This weather phenomenon is
characterized by a narrow and
violently rotating column of air
that extends from a thunderstorm
to the surface of the Earth.
 INTRODUCTION

These violent vortices can

harbor powerful, swirling winds
that can range from 65 mph up
to more than 200 mph.
The formation of tornadoes is called
“Tornadogenesis.”
Tornadogenesis
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4
Storm Storm Tornado Tornado
Development Organization Formation Dissipation
The downdraft The rear flank
Supercell The updraft in the (descending downdraft wraps
thunderstorms supercell currents of cold around the
form. Wind thunderstorm and dense air) tornado, which
shear causes a picks up the concentrates the cuts of its air
horizontal horizontal spin rotation, which supply, causing it
circulation of and tilts it into a forms a narrow to weaken and
air. vertical axis. column of eventually
rotating air. dissipate.
 Types of Tornadoes

Tornadoes come in a variety of

manifestations. Some are rope-like and
non-destructive, while others are beastly
and can wreak havoc.
 Types of Tornadoes

1. Rope Tornado
This type of tornado is the
smallest and most common type
of tornado.
 Types of Tornadoes
2. Cone Tornado
It is narrower where they touch the ground than where they
meet the base of the associated thunderstorm.
 Types of Tornadoes
3. Wedge Tornado
This is the largest and
most destructive type of
tornado. They appear wider
than they are tall.
 Types of Tornadoes
4. Multi-Vortex and Satellite Tornadoes
This happens when a
storm produces multiple
twisters at the same time.
 Types of Tornadoes
5. Waterspouts and Landspouts

These weather
phenomena occur without
the presence of a supercell
thunderstorm.
 The Enhanced Fujita Scale
Using this scale, tornadoes
are rated based on the severity of
the damage they cause, along
with an estimated wind speed
associated with each damage
level.
Tornado Alley
Development of the IM
 Development of the IM
Content
Software Tool Brochure vs. Module
Screening
Initially, the content of the
Several softwares My groupmate and I had
were tested, so as to deliberated on whether to module was very minimal
determine which one follow a brochure type of and extremely condensed.
was to be used in the instructional material or For this reason, we added
crafting of the IMs. that of a module set-up. more information pertaining
These softwares were Eventually, the module to tornadoes, such as the
Canva, Microsoft set-up was selected, types of tornadoes, as well
Word, and Piktochart. because, if done using safety measures on what to
Needless to say, that format, it can be do before, during, and after
Microsoft Word utilized by more people, the onset of such. This
prevailed, as it proved such as secondary afforded the module a higher
to be more efficient. teachers, students, tutors level of comprehensiveness.
and tutorees.
 Development of the IM
Content Finalizatio Plagiarism
Evaluation n Check
After paraphrasing, I ran
The error cited by two (2)
After internal critiquing,
of the teachers was two (2) to three (3)
we had three (3) science
addressed. Furthermore, paragraphs on the free
teachers evaluate the
our class adviser version of Grammarly.
instructional material, to
suggested the entire class However, this proved to
which they cited one (1)
to paraphrase most of the be quite unreliable, as
particular error.
text within the IMs, which there were discrepancies
we also duly complied of the results despite
with. having the same text.
Instructional Material
Before the Validation
 IM Before the Validation

1. One activity did not jive 2. A citation was 3. The instructional

with its title. It was titled inappropriately material before the
“Modified True or placed, which validation had more
False,” but it was lessened texts which
supposed to be a simple readability by required
True or False activity. obstructing the flow paraphrasing.
Thus, the word “Modified” of the text.
was eliminated.
 IM Before the Validation

1. One activity did not jive

with its title. It was titled
“Modified True or
False,” but it was
supposed to be a simple
True or False activity.
Thus, we eliminated the
word “Modified.”
 IM Before the Validation

2. A citation was
inappropriately placed,
which lessened readability,
by obstructing the flow of
the text.
 IM Before the Validation
3. The instructional material before the validation had more texts which
required paraphrasing.
Initial Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of Revised Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of
Tornadoes Tornadoes
Steps of the Validation
 Prior to handing-in the
module, I first contacted
and conferred with them
in relation to evaluating
the learning material.
 After they agreed to do so, I
brought in the instructional
material the following day,
and then disseminated it to
the three (3) evaluators.
 They asked for five (5) days
to evaluate the module. That
is, I handed-in the module on
Friday, and I retrieved it by
Wednesday.
 During the date of retrieval,
they cited a few errors, as
well as relayed
appreciation.
Evaluation Sheet or Tool
 Evaluation Sheet or Tool
The evaluation sheet that
we had to use was from the
Learning Resources
Management and
Development System or
LRMDS, which is used by
DepEd in evaluating
instructional materials for
deployment en masse.
Evaluation Sheet or Tool
Evaluation Sheet or Tool
Evaluation Sheet or Tool
Evaluation Sheet or Tool
Descriptors of Factors
1-4 of the Evaluation
Rating Sheet
Factor 1: Content
Factor 1: Content
Factor 2: format
Factor 3: Presentation and organization
Factor 3: Presentation and organization
Factor 4:Accuracy and up-to-datedness of information
Factor 4:Accuracy and up-to-datedness of information
Characteristics of the
Evaluators
Characteristics of the Evaluators

Name: Mrs. Yole Cris C. Matugas

Age: 40 years old
Rank: Teacher I
Years of 11 years
Service:
Degree: Bachelor of Secondary Education
Major in Science
Characteristics of the Evaluators

Name: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz

Age: 46 years old
Rank: Teacher II
Years of 11 years
Service:
Degree: Bachelor of Science in Biology

Bachelor of Secondary Education

Major in Science
Characteristics of the Evaluators

Name: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña

Age: 39 years old
Rank: Teacher III
Years of 10 years
Service:
Degree: Bachelor of Secondary Education
Major in Science
 In total, there are
three (3) evaluators
who are currently
teaching in Naval
National High School.
Result of the Evaluation
Evaluator: Mrs. Yole Cris C. Matugas
Factor 1: Content
Evaluator: Mrs. Yole Cris C. Matugas
Factor 2: Format
Evaluator: Mrs. Yole Cris C. Matugas
Factor 3: Presentation and Organization
Evaluator: Mrs. Yole Cris C. Matugas
Factor 4: Accuracy and Up-to-Datedness of Information
Evaluator: Mrs. Yole Cris C. Matugas
Evaluator: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz
Factor 1: Content
Evaluator: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz
Factor 2: Format
Evaluator: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz
Factor 3: Presentation and Organization
Evaluator: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz
Factor 4: Accuracy and Up-to-Datedness of Information
Evaluator: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña
Factor 1: Content
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña
Factor 2: Format
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña
Factor 3: Presentation and Organization
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña
Factor 4: Accuracy and Up-to-Datedness of Information
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña

Factor 4: Accuracy and

Up-to-Datedness of
Information
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña
Evaluator: Mrs. Yole Cris C. Matugas
Factor 1: Content 28 / 28 PASSED
Factor 2: Format 72 / 72 PASSED
Factor 3: Presentation and 20 / 20 PASSED
Organization
Factor 4: Accuracy and 24 / 24 PASSED
Up-to-Datedness of Information
Total: 144 / 144 PASSED
Remark:
She likened the module to an issue of “Reader’s
Digest.”
Evaluator: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz
Factor 1: Content 28 / 28 PASSED
Factor 2: Format 72 / 72 PASSED
Factor 3: Presentation and 20 / 20 PASSED
Organization
Factor 4: Accuracy and 24 / 24 PASSED
Up-to-Datedness of Information
Total: 144 / 144 PASSED
Remark:
She cited an error pertaining to the title of an activity.
That is, the title of the task didn’t coincide with the test itself.
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña
Factor 1: Content 27 / 28 PASSED
5. Material Enhances the Development of Desirable Values and
Traits – 3
Factor 2: Format 69 / 72 PASSED
1.4. Print Quality – 3
2.3. Proper Labelling (Captioning) – 3
3.4. Harmonious Blending of Elements – 3
Factor 3: Presentation and Organization 20 / 20 PASSED
Factor 4: Accuracy and 24 / 24 PASSED
Up-to-Datedness of Information
Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña

Remarks:
1. Similar to Ma’am Katherine’s remark, she cited an error
pertaining to the title of an activity. That is, the title of the
task didn’t coincide with the test itself.
2. Emphasized proper citation of pictures to avoid plagiarism
issues.
3. Suggested font uniformity.
Overall

Factor 1: Content

5. Material Enhances the Development of Desirable Values and

Traits, such as:

Honesty and Trustworthiness 1

Scientific Attitude and Reasoning 2
Critical and Creative Thinking 2
Respect 1
Desire to Learn New Things 1
Revised Instructional Material
 Revised Instructional Material

1. One activity did not jive

with its title. It was titled
“Modified True or
False,” but it was
supposed to be a simple
True or False activity.
Thus, we eliminated the
word “Modified.”
Revised Instructional Material
 Revised Instructional Material

2. A citation was
inappropriately placed,
which lessened readability,
by obstructing the flow of
the text.
Revised Instructional Material
 Revised Instructional Material
3. The instructional material before the validation had more texts which
required paraphrasing.
Initial Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of Revised Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of
Tornadoes Tornadoes
 Revised Instructional Material
3. The instructional material before the validation had more texts which
required paraphrasing.
Initial Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of Revised Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of
Tornadoes Tornadoes
 Revised Instructional Material
3. The instructional material before the validation had more texts which
required paraphrasing.
Initial Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of Revised Content for Lesson 1.2: Types of
Tornadoes Tornadoes
 Revised Instructional Material
4. Proper citation of the images should be observed to avoid plagiarism issues.
 Revised Instructional Material
4. Proper citation of the images should be observed to avoid plagiarism issues.
Presentation of the
Revised Module
Evaluator: Mrs. Katherine G. Ortiz

March 29, 2023 at 4:34 PM

Evaluator: Mrs. Liezel E. Luaña

March 29, 2023 at 4:58 PM

 Tornadoes are proof that some
of the most majestic manifestations
of nature are deadly.
- Arianne, 2023
Danger can be quite majestic.
Thank
you.