You are on page 1of 3

2.

Police should be allowed to use lethal force

Affirmative side Counter Argument


I disagree to the statement that you deliver. A
First argument, current crimes nowadays that lot of aspects should be considered in this
spreads in our country is not normal anymore. topic and one is the health of each and every
Hence, lethal force is one of the solution that we one of us. Based on the republic of 2009
can do to stop crimes. Implementing the usage of no.9745 also known as Anti-torture act. You
lethal force by our policemen can scares out the have no rights to torture, to punish a person
criminals and that causes a less of criminal with degrading emotion or inhumane actions.
records in this country.
Lethal force is not just a thing that police can
Second argument, Police are one of the use anytime. It is a system wherein extremely
disciplined citizens here in our country. They are actions are allowed. We shan’t use lethal
the one that we can entrust our life. So the usage force. Instead Strict and mandatory of the
of lethal force is very effective. In fact it can help right acts will do. In that process no one will
to lessen the criminals and as well as the drug get hurt but the government can assure you
addicts. Being conscious to your health doesn’t that you will have the justice that you deserve.
matter on this topic because you have nothing to
worry if you are not making a crime.
Lethal force might be brutal as it commonly says Lethal force is not the solution to stop crimes.
but it is a effective way to lessen the criminals
here in our country,
4. Schools should have armed guards

Defending side Counter argument


First argument, The idea of having armed guards at school First and foremost, school is a safe place wherein you can
is very effective. To ensure the safety of each students and entrust your children for their safety. Based on the republic
teachers, armed guards are the best thing to do. Principals act of 2013 no.10591 also known as comprehensive
should consider this platform because it gives the best firearms ammunition regulation act, School staff should not
assurance to the parents that their children is safe when at carry guns because they are lack of tactical knowledge of
school. handling weapons that trained from the law enforcement
personnel receive on a regular day basis.
Second argument, Armed guards received the proper
education of handling firearms and got a diploma from the In addition, armed guards are different from security
proper institution. That is the reason why Guards can guards. Security guards in school is only responsible for
handle it carefully. checking the school property and unauthorized persons.
They are not responsible for any crimes that are happening
Third argument, Criminals mostly attack at night, well then inside the school. Not unless, they are the one who lets
the security must have the weapon to use in order to enter it.
protect themselves from any harm. Aside from the safety of
our security guards at school, it is way more better that Although they are security guards, they still have no license
they are confident that they can protect themselves from from the authorities yet. The education that they receive is
any danger. not the same from the police that carries the gun in all the
time. Having weapons without license is punishable by the
law.
5. Social media contribute to teenage suicide

Defending side Counter argument


I agree to the statement that social media contribute to I disagree to the statement that you have said. Mental
teenage suicide. Current population or the usage of social health awareness comes in this situation. All actions and
media is 4.97 billion? Can you imagine? Reading and activity that you are doing is the reflection of your mental,
getting information from different sources are really not physical and emotional health. Teenage suicide is a self-
that good. They are not from liable sources. harm that goes into the type of health which is the mental
health.
First argument that we are talking is about the spreading
fake news through the social media platform. Fake news Mental health is one of the most important type of health
have the biggest factor on teenage suicide. Fake news can that should be taking care of. You will not commit suicide if
lead into different bad effects through the social media. you are in the right thinking. Not to discriminate one’s
That is why based on the republic act of 10175 section 6 or feeling nor thinking but as the psychology says, “Mental
also known as (Anti Cybercrime Law) spreading fake news is Illness occurs only when you don’t take care of your mental
prohibited by the law. health”
Second argument. Social media gets to give negative If you do take care of your mental health properly you will
messages, self-harm, some are out of the community not think of any suicidal think or self-harm. So it is very
standards and mostly is adopting self harm practices from important to speak somebody always, if you have a
shared videos. All the situation that I stated includes all in problem. Social media has nothing to do with this situation.
cybercrime which is related to social media. If it affects you, cut off any relation that affects your mental
health in order to free yourself from self-harm

You might also like