Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steam reforming of natural gas produces about 7 kg CO 2 per 1 kg of H2 (Princeton University 1997)
●The feed is mixed with a small H 2 stream, preheated and sent to the desulphurization reactor.
●After the desulphurization, the feed is mixed with the process steam generated in the steam reboiler.
●The feed is mixed with steam and it is reformed into a raw hydrogen rich gas.
●Heat for reforming is generated by combustion of fuel gas and purge gas from PSA.
●The heat from the reformed gas is recovered for steam generation.
●The reformed gas is fed to the high temperature CO conversion to produce additional H 2.
●After CO conversion, the converted gas is cooled down in a series of heat exchangers.
●The exchanged heat is used to preheat process streams.
CO2 removal
1. Foster-Wheeler
2. Haldor Topsoe
3. UHDE
4. Air products
5. UOP
6. Technip
7. Linde (acquisition od Selas America)
1. Hydro-Chem/Linde
2. Pan American Enterprises
3. Mahler
4. Caloric
5. CarboTech
6. H2Gen
7. Harvest
8. Hygear
9. HyRadix
10. Osaka Gas
●Most flue gases have very low CO2 partial pressures and near atmospheric
pressure with CO2 concentrations of 3% to 13%.
●Many of acid gas treatment processes operate at 10 barg and cannot remove CO 2
to less than 0,1 barg partial pressure.
●Only commercially absorbents for recovery of dilute CO 2 from atmospheric
pressure gas are monoethanolamine (MEA), including newly developed hindered
amines
●Approximately 0,33 mol of CO2 is absorbed by 1,0 mole of amine at atmospheric
pressure
●Hot KCO3 is effectively used in many ammonia, hydrogen, natural gas plants
●Suitable for bulk removal of CO2 and removal of relatively high concentrations of
CO2 from gas streams
●The most known process with is Benfield process with KCO 3 by UOP with over
675 units worldwide
●There is also well known Catacarb process with KCO 3
●The process with KCO3 is designed for CO2 removal from high pressure streams
and requires an optimal feed CO2 partial pressure of 7 barg (minimum of 2 barg)
Example:
Econamine FG by Fluor for CO2 removal by using MEA
Example:
Amine Guard by UOP for CO2 removal by using amines
Example:
Benfield by UOP for CO2 removal by using KCO3
1. UOP
2. BASF
3. Dow Chemical
4. Elf Aquitaine
5. Fluoro
6. Texaco
7. Union
Steam Reforming-Advantages
●Steam Reforming of natural gas offers an efficient, economical and widely used
process for hydrogen production, and provides near- and mid-term energy
security and enviroment benefits.
●The efficiency of the Steam Refoming process is about 65% to 75%, among
the highest of currently commercially available production methods.
●Natural gas is available, convenient, easy to handle, hydrogen feedstock with a
high hydrogen-to-carbon ratio.
●The cost of hydrogen produced by Steam refoming is dependant on natural gas
prices and is curently the least expensive among all bulk hydrigen production
technologies.
●A well developed natural gas infrastructure exists and it is a key factor that
makes hydrogen production from natural gas attractive.
Steam Reforming-Challenges
●During the production of H2, CO2 is produced.
●The Steam reforming process emission: CO2 produced ≥ H2 produced
●To avoid emission of CO2, CO2 can be captured and sequestered
●Possible near or mid term shortages of natural gas
●Significant R&D is required to bring the cost of H2 using Steam Reforming down
and to make the process more efficient
●American DOE's target is to reduce the cost of distributed H2 production from
$3/kg H2 to $1,5/kg H2 by 2010, and improve efficiency from 68% to 75%.
Hydrogen Trends
Investment
price of plant (incl. demin water unit) 1.900.000 EURO
Erection/Commissioning (assumption) 510.000 EURO
others 0 EURO
Total investment costs 2.410.000 EURO
Operating data
operating hours/day 24 h/d
operating days/week 7 d/w
operating weeks/year 51 w/a
operating hours/year 8.568 h/a
Financial figures
Depreciation 10 years
Interest rate 8,5 %
Natural gas 0,350 EURO/m3
Electric power 0,100 EURO/kWh
Process/demin water 5,000 EURO/m³
Cooling water 0,060 EURO/m³
Generated product gas quantity/year=400 m3/h • 99,999% • 8568 h/a = 3.427.166,00 m3/a
1.046.645 euro/a (total cost per year) / 3.427.166,00 m 3/a (total H2 produced per year) = 0,305 euro/m 3