Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Labour force
Increase in population Economic growth
Skilled manpower
Environment degradation Standard of living Health facilities
Statement of the problem
• What is the trend and pattern of economic growth and population growth?
• What degree of relationship is between dependent and explanatory variable
under study?
• Is regression statistically significant to explain the regressand?
Scope and Limitation
• This study is useful for the further research on factors affecting the
economic growth of Nepal.
3
2.72920359986776
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
-0.268486268243194
-0.5
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
12
10 9.68113001523059
-2
-2.97740585754975
-4
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
12
10 9.68113001523059
4
2.72920359986776
0
-0.268486268243194
-2
-2.97740585754975
-4
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Correlation matrix:
rate
rate
a. Dependent Variable: GDP growth rate
Y=4.059+0.166X_1
Where,
Y= GDP growth rate And X_1 = Population growth rate.
For the overall test of regression:
ANOVA is performed and tested hypothesis with F-test.
Hypothesis for testing:
Null hypothesis (H0): the overall model is insignificant, i.e., H0: β1≠0
Against,
Alternative hypothesis (H1): the overall model is significant, i.e., H1: β1≠0
The level of significance is α at 0.05
Total 314.195 40
Model R R Square
1 0.05 0.003
Residual Analysis:
Residuals plot
6
0
3.9 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Conclusion and Recommendation
Conclusion
Despite the various theories that population growth leads to increased
manpower for economic development and increased customer demand
for products, contrary to popular opinion, rising population leads to
resource exploitation, resulting in resource scarcity and unsustainable
development.
In the context of Nepal, there appears to be no significant relationship
between population and GDP over a 41-year period.
Recommendation
• Further research can be conducted by increasing the number of data
set.
• Navaneetham, K. (2002). Age structural transition and economic growth: evidence from south and southeast Asia.
• Paul Beaudry and Fabrice Collard. (2003). Recent technological and economic change among industrialized
countries: insights from population growth. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(3), 441-464.
• Peterson, E. W. (2017). The role of population in economic growth. Sage Open, 1-15.
• Schmidt, Allen C. Kelley and Robert M. (1995). Aggregate population and economic growth correlations: the role of
the components of demographic change. Demography 32.4, 543-555.
• Simon, J. L. (1989). On Aggregate Empirical Studies Relating Population Variables to Economic Development.
Population and Development Review, 323–332.
Acknowledgement