Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Relations
Prepared by: Ms. Mel
hanacademy.org/humanities/whp-origins/era-7-the-great-convergence-and-divergence-1880-ce-to-the-future/74-
end-of-empires-betaa/a/read-connecting-decolonization-empire-and-the-cold-war-beta
Introduction
Decolonization has greatly impacted the political, economic, and socio-cultural landscape
of countries, especially of the former colonies (third world), which in turn has also affected
state-society relations. Some were able to establish a strong state but others did not.
The lesson at hand will enlighten you on state-society relations, particularly on how the
same evolved in the era where many countries ( especially third world)are supposed to be
free from the bondage of colonization and how their respective state organizations were and
are able to shape their societies.
Transformation of Societies and the United
Nations
• It has been said that “plans for social changes and the role of the state in
effecting those changes are no longer governed by hopes and beliefs
widely shared around the world; they are also the written norms of
legitimate bodies” (Migdal, 1988 p. 12)
How the United Nations has carefully considered the
socio-economic progress of third world countries
• The promotion of social and economic progress through the development
goals.
• The passage of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
• Specifying the international norms for the states with respect to socio-
economic development goals.
• The United Nations stressing the role of the states in advancing national
economic growth.
• Ensuring a higher standard of living through the state-initiated programs.
United Nations
• They should provide the so called” set of rules of the game composed of
constitutional principles, laws, regulations, and the like that state leaders
are willing to enforce through coercive means at their disposal (ibid p.14).
• There are also rules that encompass everything.
State Dominance
State’s Pervasiveness
• State’s presence and authority and the rules that it imposes in the lives of people
• According to Galbraith, “[T]here is first of all the large and pervasive apparatus of the
modern state. In the non-socialist countries it can be a little larger or a trifle smaller as
conservatives or liberals, social democrats or democrat socialists will it; but as all
practical people must agree, it will continue to be very large” (Galbraith, 1983 cited by
Migdal).
State’s Pervasiveness
• State organizations have ruled across large territories and population. (as
more states rose).
• Nevertheless, it must be noted that “the goal of universal rules- common
law, and broadly accepted norms- is not totally a novelty of the modern
era”.
Charles Tilly on how the state has imposed itself in
people’s lives
• According to Migdal (1988), Tilly “calculated the amount of time a
hypothetical average Frenchman spent working to generate revenue for the
state (through tax payments); in 1600, he estimated 50 hours of work per
year, in 1966, 650 hours- a thirteenfold increase”.
• Note that other countries outside Europe looked up to the
accomplishments of European states.
State’s Pervasiveness
• By the Mid 20th century, political leaders had adopted the end of creating
a state organization in a given territory, through which they could make a
set of rules that govern the lives of people and could authorize other
organization to make some of these rules.
• The active participation and guidance of the state is required in poor
nations.
John P. Lewis on the role of the government
Attributes of Stateness
2. Through state autonomy from domestic and outside forces state officials
have sought to act upon their own preferences, making decisions to reshape,
ignore, or circumvent the preferences of even the strongest actors.
Attributes of Stateness
“State is an organization, composed of numerous agencies led and coordinated by the state’s
leadership (executive authority) that has the ability or authority to make and implement the
binding rules for all the people as well as the parameters of rule-making for other social
organizations in a given territory using force if necessary to have its way.”
Ponder on these…..
Why has it been so significant for state organizations since the 16 th century to seek
predominance, to make or authorize rules, and to move up the scale of state attributes?
Why are state leaders so determined to changing the rules or to adhere to the so-called
“modernization?”
What are considered as threats to the existence of states and their leaders
First Modern States Applied the Triad Below
Tax collecting
Mechanism
y Co
r m ur
A ts
Social Control by the State
• Compliance
• Participation
• Legitimation
Other important things to take note of