Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESTORATIVE
MATERIALS
GUIDED BY ;- PRESENTING BY ;-
DR. SHUBHASHINI N DR. AKHILESH MN
CONTENTS
Introduction
Fluroide
Conventional GIC
Resin modified GIC (RMGICs)
Polyacid – modified composite resins (COMPOMERS)
Composite resin containing PRG fillers (GIOMERS)
Fluroide releasing composite resins
Nano ionomer GIC
Amalgomer CR
Chlorexidine impregnetaed GIC
Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate complex (CPP-
ACP)containing GIC
Calcium aluminate GIC(CERAMIR)
Activa bioactive restorative
DENTAL CARIES
Present findings suggest that the
prevalence of dental caries is a
pressing health concern affecting
at least half of the Indian
population.
Insert video
ANTICARIOGENIC
Saliva plays a crucial role in maintaining oral health and has natural
anticariogenic (anti-tooth decay) properties.
The cumulative fluoride release at the end of the study period in GIC,
RMGIC and Nano, was significantly higher than Compomer and Resin
composite.
This is responsible for the phenomenon of “burst effect,” wherein high
amounts of fluoride are released during the first two days.
Fluoride release declines rapidly during the first week and stabilizes after
three to four weeks.
FLUORIDE RELEASE FROM RESTORATIVE
MATERIALS
Higher F release values were observed in the first day, rapidly decreasing in the
second and third days, and gradually decreasing in the following days until it
reached a constant F-release level
FLUORIDE RECHARGE
ADVANTAGES
• Long Working time
• Early water sensitivity is reduced
• Rapid development of early strength
POLYACID MODIFIED RESIN COMPOSITE/COMPOMER
FLUORIDE
DURABILITY
OF
COMPOSITE
S
COMPOME
R
• Definition: Compomer can be defined as a
material that contains both the essential
components of GIC and composite but at
levels insufficient to promote the acid –base
reaction.
COMPOSITION
• Compomers are essentially a one – paste system
containing ion leachable glass & polymerizable
acidic monomers with functional groups of
polyacrylic acid & methacrylates.
• NaF and some other fillers are also present for
additional F release.
• There is no water in the formulation.
• Glass particles are partially silanated to
ensure bonding.
SETTING REACTION
• It is = 18-24Mpa
Class III and V lesions along with cervical abrasions and erosions and
Intermediate restorations
ADVANTAGES
• Superior working characteristics to RMGIC
• Ease of use
• Easily adapts to the tooth
• Good esthetics
• To summarize the differences between
the three types of materials:
• .
1. Class I and
Class II Cavities
3. As a Base
5. As core build
under composite
up under crowns
restorations
4. Classes of cavity
were radiopacity is
prime concern
Conclusion:
Amalgomer CR can be recommended as a permanent
restorative material based on its better compressive
strength and comparable antimicrobial efficacy to GIC
Fuji IX.
The fluoride release rate was significantly higher in first day and reduced
after third day to a nearly constant level.
• polyacrylic acid,
• tartaric acid,
• strontium-fluoro- alumino-glass
• strontium fluoride.
reduction in microleakage,
Conclusions: This study showed that the hybrid
CaAl-GIC possess favourable properties and have
potentials to expand its clinical applications as a dental
biomaterial.
ZIRCONOMER
The polyalkenoic acid and other components have been specially processed
to impart superior strength.
ZIRCONOMER
Calcium fluoride (CaF2) nanoparticles can be incorporated into RMGIC to improve its
mechanical properties.
However, it slightly reduces its fluoride releasing ability, as CaF2-doped GIC becomes
highly insoluble.
CONCLUSION;- Nano-apatite containing glass ionomers are expected
to have superior bonding to the tooth surface due to the formation of the
strong ionic linkages and high caries susciptible
ACTIVA BIOACTIVE RESTORATIVE