Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VESSEL BY USING
COMPOSITE
MATERIAL
TEAM
M. Naveen Reddy -18N31A0397
K. Sampath -18N31A0383
G. Sai Teja -18N31A0365
PROJECT GUIDE
Ms. Sandhya Rani
Assistant Professor
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
ABSTRACT
Cylindrical pressure vessels are widely used for commercial, underwater vehicles
and in aerospace applications. At present the outer shells of the pressure vessels are
made up of conventional metals like steels and aluminum alloys. The payload
performance/speed/operating range depends upon the weight. The lower the weight
the better the performance, one way of reducing the weight is by reducing the
weight of the shell structure. The use of composite materials improves the
performance of the vessel and offers a significant amount of material savings.
Moreover, the stacking sequence is very crucial to the strength of the composite
material. This Project involves in the design and construction of the composite
pressure vessel. Design calculations are done for multilayer pressure vessels using
Steel.
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
INTRODUCTION
• A pressure vessel is defined as a container with a
pressure differential between inside and outside.
The inside pressure is usually higher than the
outside.
• The fluid inside the vessel may undergo a change
in state as in the case of a steam boiler or may
combine with other reagents as in the case of
chemical reactors.
• Pressure vessel often has a combination of high
pressure together with high temperature and in
some cases flammable fluids or highly
radioactive materia
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
ADVANTAGES
It is easy to fabricate
Preferably cheaper to construct as
compared to the spherical one
Can easily be packed and handled for
industrial purposes
Easy to Clean
Helps Achieving Liquid Tight Welds
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
LITERATURE REVIEW
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
S.No Author Title Objective Conclusion Year of
published
1. Shyam R. Gupta, Pressure Vessel The main objective From the research paper 2014
PG Student of Mechanical Design and of this research is to design it is seen that ASME and
Department Kalol Analysis a pressure vessel. . Design other code are providing
Institution of Technology of pressure vessels is solutions for more
governed by the ASME
And Research Center, pressure vessel code. The general cases and
Kalol, India. code gives for thickness required higher factor of
and stress of basic safety, also limit load and
components, it is up to the stress concentration
designer to select formulae are not
appropriate analytical as available for non
procedure for determining
stress due to other standard shape and
loadings. intersection and
geometrical
discontinuity.
2 Prof. Mr. Amol A Review Paper on The main objective of the This review paper 2017
Mali1, Mr. Hemant Study of Pressure work is to design a pressure provides information on
Bhosale, Mr. Vessel, Design and vessel and perform some various factors that help
Dilpreet Singh Bedi, Analysis analysis. Pressure vessels are in understanding of
Mr. Akash Modasara containers used to handle factors affecting design,
fluids which are highly toxic, manufacturing and
compressible and which analysis of pressure
work at high pressures vessel.
3 Sandeep Gond, Akhilesh, Design and Analysis of the This paper illustrates The design of the 2014
Anoop Singh, Vinod Sharma, Pressure Vessel Design and Analysis of Pressure vessels is safe.
Shyaam Bihari Lal the Pressure Vessel. The Factor of
Pressure vessel is safety that we consider
reservoirs which have is permissible and by
highpressuriz ed fluid which the
inside it. The pressure is design are considered
variance between inside safe. The bursting
and outside of the pressure is
container under the allowable
stress so that the design
does not fail.
4 Jitendra Pandey, Prof A. K. A Review on “Performance The objective of the As per the observations 2018
Jain Analysis of Pressure present review paper is made from results and
Vessel with various to study the effect of discussion of the
stiffener” various parameters, due previous research
to those pressure papers, even though the
vessels can break or fail mass of the Linear
to get higher stiffener design is less ,
performance on the it does not contain
basis of previous adequate strength as it
research study.. produces maximum
stresses and higher
deformation compare
then other.
More economical.
Easy to handle.
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
DESIGN
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
DESIGN
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
CONCLUSION
considered safe.
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
REFERENCES
1. Langer, B.F., 1962. Design of pressure vessels for low-cycle fatigue
2. Carbonari, R.C., Munoz-Rojas, P.A., Andrade, E.Q., Paulino, G.H.,
Nishimoto, K. and Silva, E.C.N., 2011. Design of pressure vessels using shape
optimization: An integrated approach. International Journal of Pressure Vessels
and Piping, 88(5-7), pp.198-212.
3. Davidson, T.E. and Kendall, D.P., 1969. The design of pressure vessels for
very high pressure operation. WATERVLIET ARSENAL NY BENET
WEAPONS LAB.
4. Chattopadhyay, S., 2004. Pressure vessels: design and practice. CRC press.
5.Pellini, W.S. and Puzak, P.P., 1964. Practical considerations in applying
laboratory fracture test criteria to the fracture-safe design of pressure vessels.
6.Ross, C.T., 2011. Pressure vessels: external pressure technology. Elsevier.
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E
Thank You
For Your
Attention
D E P A R T ME N T O F M E C H A N I C A L E N G I N E E