Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DIFFERENCES
01 Individual differnces
02 intelligence
04 Personality differences
● According to Spearman, this g factor was responsible for overall performance on mental
ability tests. Spearman noted that while people certainly could and often did excel in certain
areas, people who did well in one area tended also to do well in other areas. For example, a
person who does well on a verbal test would probably also do well on other tests.
Sternberg’s triarchic theory
According to Robert J. Sternberg’s triarchic theory of intelligence, intelligence
comes in three forms: analytical, creative, and practical
● Consider Latisha, who scores high on traditional intelligence tests such as the
Stanford-Binet. Latisha’s _________________ approximates what has traditionally
been called intelligence and what is commonly assessed by intelligence tests.
● Todd does not have the best test scores but has an insightful and creative mind.
Sternberg calls the type of thinking at which Todd excels _______________________.
● Finally, consider Emanuel, a person whose scores on traditional IQ tests are low but
who quickly identifies solutions to real-life problems. He easily picks up knowledge
about how the world works. Emanuel’s “street smarts” and practical know-how are
what Sternberg calls _________________.
● Students with high analytic ability tend to be favored in
conventional schools.
● Creatively intelligent students might not conform to teachers’
expectations about how assignments should be done. They give
unique answers, for which they might get reprimanded or marked
down.
● Practical intelligence students frequently do well outside the
classroom’s walls. Their social skills and common sense may allow
them to become successful managers or entrepreneurs, despite
undistinguished school records.
● Sternberg stresses that few tasks are purely analytic, creative, or
practical.
● Most tasks require some combination of these skills.
● It is important for classroom instruction to give students
opportunities to learn through all three types of intelligence.
• The ability to think in words and to use language to express meaning (authors, journalists, speakers)
Mathematical skills:
Spatial skills:
Bodily-kinesthetic skills:
• The ability to manipulate objects and be physically adept (surgeons, craft s people, dancers, athletes)
Musical skills:
• A sensitivity to pitch, melody, rhythm, and tone (composers, musicians, and music therapists)
Intrapersonal skills:
• The ability to understand oneself and effectively direct one’s life (theologians, psychologists)
Interpersonal skills:
• The ability to understand and effectively interact with others (successful teachers, mental health professionals)
Naturalist skills:
• The ability to observe patterns in nature and understand natural and human-made systems (farmers, botanists, ecologists,
landscapers)
Misuses of Gardener’s approach
● Trying to teach all subjects/concepts using all intelligences.
no reason to assume that every subject can be effectively taught in eight different ways to correspond
to the eight intelligences, and attempting to do this is a waste of effort.
● Assuming that it is enough just to apply a certain type of intelligence. For example, in
terms of bodily-kinesthetic skills, random muscle movements have nothing to do with cultivating
cognitive skills.
• Computers encourage students to revise and rewrite compositions; this should help them to produce more competent papers
Mathematical skills:
• Students of every ability can learn effectively through interesting soft ware programs that provide immediate feedback and go far beyond drill-
and-practice exercises.
Spatial skills:
• Virtual-reality technology
Bodily-kinesthetic skills:
• Computers rely mostly on eye-hand coordination for their operation—keyboarding and the use of a mouse or touch-screen. Th is kinesthetic
activity
Musical skills:
• Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) makes it possible to compose for and orchestrate many different instruments
Intrapersonal skills:
• Technology offers the means to explore a line of though in great depth. Th e opportunity for students to make such choices is at the heart of
giving them control over their own learning and intellectual development
Interpersonal skills:
• When students use computers in pairs or small groups, their comprehension and learning are facilitated and accelerated
Naturalist skills:
• Electronic technologies can “facilitate scientific investigation, exploration, and other naturalist activities. For example: National Geographic
03
Thinking & learning styles
Thinking and learning style
● Intelligence refers to ability.
● Learning and thinking styles are not abilities but, rather, preferred
ways of using one’s abilities (Sternberg, 2015c).
● (impulsive/reflective, deep/surface, and optimistic/pessimistic)
impulsive reFLEctive
Person reacts quickly Reacts more slowly
● Students who approach learning with a surface style fail to tie what
they are learning into a larger conceptual framework. They tend to learn
in a passive way, often rotely memorizing information.
Deep learners are more likely to actively construct
what they learn and give meaning to what they need
to remember
Less concerned about evaluation of performance
personality temperament
● Think about yourself for a moment. What is your personality like? Are
you outgoing or shy?
● Considerate or caring?
● Friendly or hostile?
● How stable are personality traits in adolescence? Some researchers have
found that personality is not as stable in adolescence as in adulthood
(Roberts, Wood, & Caspi, 2008).
Big-five factor
● Psychologists have suggested “The Big Five Personality Factors” which could
demonstrate the specific personality characteristics and how these characteristics are
affecting the learner’s abilities.
● If you can’t recognize what you are feeling, how can you make good
choices about jobs, relationships, time management or even
entertainment?
● Communicate your feelings to others?
● Friends keep asking, ‘what’s wrong?’ and you keep saying, ‘nothing’
How To Handle Individual Differences?
Assessment
Objectives of the
Language
class
Teaching Approaches
Subgroups
(IEPs)
Exceptional students