Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Describe the Logical Research
Process?
2
Topics - The Research Process
Step 1 -Problem- Selection (title) & formulation of Research Problem
Step 2 - Literature survey
3
Research Process (general)
Problem
Research
Design Data Collection
(Qnt./Qlt./ & Analysis
Design sc.
Develop
Instrument/
procedure
4
5
Design Research Process
Metrics, Analysis
How to Knowledge
Identify Define Design & Demonstration Evaluation Communicati
Knowledge
Problem & Objectives of Development Find Suitable on
Disciplinary
Inference
Knowledge
Effective, Scholarly
Theory
Process Iterations
6
Where can we get a research problem – topic?
From supermarket?
7
Step 1: Problems/Questions- Topic
A question/problem occurs or is posed to the researcher for which that researcher has no and can find no answer(s).
Example ;
Some mobiles are being used widely? Sentiment analysis
While we search on the web there are a number of junks responded?
In some places accidents are prevalent than others?
8
Selecting a topic
– All writing begins with a topic.
– Look for a subject
• that interests you and will maintain your interest
throughout the various stages of research
• that will help you to obtain the maximum self-
development from the research project. /It
should be related with your career.
– Some preliminary reading will help to determine the
extent of your interest.
– Keep in mind the time allotted to you and the
expected length of the research paper.
9
Selecting a topic … cont’d
– You Commonly begin with fairly general topic and
then refine it by research and thought into a more
specific one.
– Try to narrow your topic by focusing on a particular
aspect of a particular approach.
– Be original as much as you can, to avoid duplicate
work on a specific topic
– Review as much Literature as possible to avoid
duplication.
– The eventual successful completion of a research
study will be seen to have depended on the selection
of an appropriate topic.
– Before beginning the project, make sure you
understand the amount and depth of research
required and the type of paper expected.
10
Identify broad area of study
Supervisor agreed
yes
Is there sufficient scope? No
yes
Acceptable topic
11
Problem cont…
12
Feasibility Study: Here is a new idea, is
it possible ?
• Is it possible to solve a specific kind of problem … effectively ?
+ computer science perspective (Turing test, …)
+ engineering perspective (build efficiently; fast — small)
+ economic perspective (cost effective; profitable)
• Is the technique new / novel / innovative ?
+ compare against alternatives
• Proof by construction
+ build a prototype
+ often by applying on a “CASE”
• Conclusions
+ primarily qualitative; "lessons learned“,
+ quantitative: - economic perspective: cost – benefit, engineering
perspective: speed - memory footprint
13
SIX guidelines to pick and
formulate an important and
useful research problem
18
6 Guidelines to Formulate Research Problems
1. Look Around You
Everywhere, Concentrate on smaller problems
19
Formulating the Research Problem
• The task of formulating, or defining a research problem is
a step of greatest importance in the entire research
process.
• It is important because,
– (1) It determines the data to be collected,
– (2) It determines the characteristic of the data which
are relevant,
– (3) it determines the choice of techniques to be used.,
– (4) It determines the form of the final report.
28
Formulating the Research Problem ….cont’d
Some general principles in problem formulation
– Be sure the problem exists
– Learn as much as possible about the problem
to be solved
– Consider alternative formulations in case this is
not feasible;
– Be aware that the problem formulation may
influence the phenomena being studied;
29
Thus
After identifying a research problem, therefore, you must
articulate it in such a way that it is carefully phrased and
represents the single goal of the total research effort.
So once you’ve identified a research problem:
•State that problem clearly and completely.
•Determine the feasibility of the research.
Identify subproblems:
•Completely researchable units.
•Small in number.
•Add up to the total problem.
•Must be clearly tied to the interpretation of the data.
30
The Problem Statement
Bad habits – try to state a research problem by jotting
down meaningless groups of words, verbal fragments - no
help in seeing the problem clearly
Examples of half-statements, mere verbal blobs that only
hint at the problem but do not state it
A) Software metrics and the quality of software
B) Subsidise ICT industry
C) ICT promotes English in school
D) QoS in computer network
31
Cont…
The fragments demonstrate that the researcher either
cannot or will not think in terms of specific, researchable
goals
32
Example: Metric and Quality
What effect does module size has on the understandability
of program for a Science subject educational software?
The metric: module size
The quality attribute: understandability
The domain: program, Science subject, educational
software
33
Example : describe the basic problem of
your research?
34
Research Questions
In cases where you don’t have hypothesis you may need
to formulate research questions representing the problem
in a form of question. Here is example;
35
Formulating the Research Problem ….cont’d
Evaluation of a research problem (some questions to ask):
– Is the problem in line with my goal/expectations and
the expectation of others?
– Will the solution of the problem advance knowledge?
– What is the value of potential outcome? (who are the
beneficiaries?)
– Do I possess or can I acquire the necessary skills,
abilities and background knowledge to study the
problem? (Researcher’s capability and interest)
– Will data be accessible?
– Do I have access to the necessary resources (time,
money, tools, equipments, laboratory, subjects, etc)
to conduct the investigation?
36
Step 2: Literature, Theory, Logic
What is the purpose of literature review?
37
Literature Review (LR)
In general, students don’t understand the purpose of
investigating the literature
Its function – the more one knows the more knowledgeably one
can approach the problems
Re+view = look again at what others have done in areas that are
similar, though not necessarily identical to, one’s own area of
investigation
As a researcher, you should know the literature about your topic
very, very well
Many benefits from review
38
Benefits of Literature Review
It can offer new ideas, perspectives, and approaches that may
not have occurred to you
It can inform you about other researchers who conduct work in
this area – individuals whom you may wish to contact for
advice or feedback
It can show you how others have handled methodological and
design issues in studies similar to your own
It can reveal sources of data that you may not have known
existed
It can introduce you to measurement tools that other
researchers have developed and used effectively
39
Benefits of Literature Review
It can reveal methods of dealing with problematic
situations that may be similar to difficulties you are facing
It can help you interpret and make sense of your findings
and, ultimately, help you tie your results to the work of
those who have preceded you
It will bolster your confidence that your topic is one worth
studying, because you will find that others have invested
considerable time, effort, and resources in studying it
40
The researcher should also examine all available literature to
Literature
get Review
himself acquainted with the selected problem.
42
Literature Survey ….cont’d
• The researcher may review two types of literature
– Conceptual literature
Concerning the concepts and theories.
– Empirical literature
Consisting of studies made earlier which are
similar to the one proposed.
43
Literature Survey ….cont’d
44
Literature Survey ….Cont’d
• The researcher has to look into the following
factors in his/her judgment on point of literature
concentration;
–Style of research;
–The overall strategy of research;
–Objectives of the proposed study;
The
– nature of the substantive problem and how much
is known about it;
The
– development of the literature in the area;
The
– degree of desire of the study to follow the
directions established by the literature;
T–he knowledge the researcher already has;
15
45
Writing LR - Guidelines
1. Get the proper psychological orientation
2. Have a plan
3. Emphasise relatedness
4. Give credit where credit is due
5. Review the literature. Don’t reproduce it!
6. Summarise what you have read
7. Remember that your first draft will almost certainly
NOT be your last draft
8. Ask others for advice and feedback
53
Development of Objectives,
Research Questions and working
Hypotheses
56
Developing objectives and
Working Hypothesis
– Objectives:
• Statements that indicate what a researcher intends
to accomplish in a more specific term;
– Hypothesis:
• An assertion about the relationship between two or
more concepts.
• Important bridges between empirical inquiry and
theory
• They indirectly determine the quality of data which
is required for the analysis.
57
Developing objectives and Working Hypothesis …cont’d
58
Developing objectives and Working Hypothesis …cont’d
A hypothesis must be
– Specific
– Conceptually clear in terms of common definitions
– Testable (verification or rejection) by available
techniques and resources;
– Related to a body of theory;
– Stated to provide direction for the research;
– Formulated as causal relationships;
59
Developing objectives and Working Hypothesis …cont’d
60
Step 3: Research Design
It is the entire design of the research project
It is said as the research proposal
It involves deciding on all aspects of the research process,
of course focusing on methodology
That includes
Philosophical assumption
General Research method
Data collection techniques
Data analysis, and solution development
Publication outlet if possible
It matters to get your proposal accepted or rejected
61
Thus.. Design of the Research
• Once the research problem is formulated and working
hypothesis developed, the researcher will be required to
prepare a research design.
More on chapter 3
63
Design of research …cont’d
• The preparation of the research design,
appropriate for a particular research problem,
involves usually the consideration of the
following.
65
Step 4: Develop
Instruments/procedures
There are different data collection Methods
1. Questionnaire
2. Interview (structured and unstructured interview)
3. Observation
4. Computer log files
5. Web files
6. Daily transaction records
7. Camera (for security, face recognition etc…
More on Chapter 3
66
Instrument …
Develop your instrument to measure your variables
You can get some instrument from published articles
One variable can be measured by multiple questions
Check the instrument if it is useful for your context: add
new questions or remove irrelevant ones
Use statistical tools to check instrument validity
Undertake pilot testing before you use your instrument in
the actual survey
Statistical tools can be used like Cronbach Alpha and
Reliability Tests
67
Step 5: Data Collection and Analysis
Follow and adhere to the research design
Train your data collectors if you use data collectors
Monitor data collection in the field
Wrong data will result wrong conclusions
Check your data if it is taken from databases for reliability
68
Cont…
The data that were gathered are analyzed in
ascertaining their meaning.
Involves statistical analyses, for the most part.
The specific statistical tests and procedures depend
on the nature of the underlying data.
Machine learning approaches
Design and evaluate
Qualitative researchers used words to understand
and describe the phenomena
More on Chapter 5
69
Step 6: Data
Interpretation/Solution Design
The researcher interprets the newly analyzed data and
suggests a conclusion.
Interpretation means identifying relationship
between variables to draw conclusions
Provide lessons from design a solution
Testing hypothesis if any – Reject or Accept
Provide explanations for accepting or rejecting
The Data for SW success shows low figures, below
our expectation. What it tells us! Does it mean the
SW failed? What causes the Failure? How do we
overcome those Failures?
70
Cont…
The data will either support the propositions
and hypotheses or they won’t.
This may lead the researcher to cycle back to
an earlier step in the process and begin again
with a new hypothesis.
This is one of the self-correcting mechanisms
associated with the scientific method.
72
…Cont’d
THE END!
74