Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In presenting your review of related literature, The Relationship of Ethics and Research
the following states are recommended Ethics in research can be defined as the norms
to showcase coherency. for conduct that distinguish between
acceptable and unacceptable behaviors. It can
1. There appears to be strong evidence that … also be defined as a process of applying moral
2. The literature has shown … standards and principles in any undertaking. In
3. The foregoing literature has shown … general, the ethical standard in research is used
4. The data supporting the hypothesis are … so that a researcher will be able to define right
from wrong.
Another pointer in crafting a coherent review of
related literature is to use an index card. It is Ethics serve a very vital role in conducting a
one of the most convenient and effective research study. It can keep the
research tools that will help you in organizing researcher from committing misconduct while
your information for this chapter. seeking knowledge and truth, and
Here’s how to use your index cards. respecting and protecting the rights of the
• Make a separate card for each source. respondents-humans and animals. Ethics
• Give each source a racking number. also promote essential values that help
• For a book, include the author, title, date & researchers to have a common understanding
place of publication, and and work on a topic harmoniously. Also, ethics
publisher. bind different experts together in the spirit of
important values such as accountability, The researchers must also keep the
cooperation, coordination, mutual confidentiality of every data gathered and must
understanding, respect, and fairness, among protect its privacy.
others. 8) Social and legal responsibility- A researcher
Ethics in research follow eight (8) principles. must abide by the legalities, rules, policies, and
These principles must be taken seriously by regulations set by his/her partner institution or
each researcher to secure an ethical study. organization.
1) Honesty- a researcher must secure honesty in The need for ethics is very vital in research
producing his/her study. Transparency is the key because of these reasons:
of upholding honesty in research. Researchers 1) Norms promote the aims of research such as
must see to it that all borrowed intellectual knowledge, truth, understanding, and
property must be cited accurately. avoidance of error.
2) Objectivity- Researchers must see to it that 2) Norms promote the values that are essential
she/he is free from any form of bias in all to collaborative work such as trust,
aspects of his/her research paper. accountability, mutual respect, and fairness.
3) Integrity- The researcher must secure that They also protect intellectual property interests
the study holds sincerity and consistency. The and encourage confidentiality even in
researchers must see to it that all of the parts collaboration.
promised and presented during the 3) Norms ensure that researchers can be held
presentation of the proposal must be kept accountable to the public. To a certain extent,
4) Carefulness- The researcher must see to it they draw parameters on which ideas to write
that the conduct of the study must be and how they should be written.
free from any carelessness and errors of 4) Norms promote a variety of other important
negligence. All-important data must be moral and social values. Ethical lapses in
kept for future uses. research can significantly harm human and
5) Openness- Researches must see to it that animal subjects, students,
they are open-minded persons wherein other individuals, and the public in general.
they can accept suggestions from others and 5) Norms help build public support for research.
they can handle constructive This happens when individuals and
criticism. organizations believe in the integrity and
6) Respect for intellectual property- A good credibility of the researcher/s, thus they will
researcher must see to it that she/he practices offer support for the project.
respect for intellectual property. This principle
can be executed upon proper citation of For you to further understand the function of
borrowed statements and giving due credit to ethics in research, here are some
the owner. terminologies that may aid you:
7) Trustworthiness- A researcher must secure 1) Ethical relativism- this refers to the view that
that he/she is maintaining his/her values are relative in the sense that a person
trustworthiness. The researchers must see to it feels his/her value is better than any other
that any data or information in the research, person’s value.
especially those data from surveys and other 2) Ethical principles- this term refers to values
data gathering procedures, must be used that are translated into rules or
according to its proper and allotted usage only. standards of conduct.
3) Ethical dilemma- this refers to situations b) Mosaic Plagiarism- this is defined by
where there is an evident conflict between changing only some words in the
values and principles and the choice of action copied information. The sentence
needs to be decided. Upon the absence of structure is still maintained.
ethics in conducting your research, you might c) Misattribution Plagiarism- this type of
be able to do some unethical deeds commonly plagiarism can be done if an author
known as scientific misconduct. wrongly cited information, maybe to the
The following are the possible scientific wrong authors or to the non-existing
misconducts that can be done in research: authors.
1) Fabrication and falsification of data- also d) Self-Plagiarism- this type of
known as “cooking of data”. This scientific plagiarism can be committed if an
misconduct involves producing data without author republishes his/her work. Self-
actual experimentation or altering data in plagiarism comes in two forms,
recording for the intention to fit them to what is duplication, and replication. Duplication
expected. can be committed once a researcher
2) Non-publication of data- In contrast with copies and submits without proper
fabrication and falsification, non-publication of citations. Replication, on the other
data involves choosing not to include data hand, is multiple cases of duplication.
because they do not conform to the well-
established body of knowledge or are Presenting Written Review of Related
unsupportive of the research hypothesis. Only Literature
the results that do not reject the hypothesis are
reported and published. Literature Review Structure
3) Faulty data gathering procedures- It is The structure of your literature review greatly
referred to as negligence or carelessness depends on the type of your research and your
that leads to errors in measurement or faulty research area. In your structure, topic areas,
research instruments. An Error may controversial issues, and questions with varying
also be caused by inappropriate application of themes must be considered.
treatment to the subjects and poor
data recording. When combining information coming from
4) Plagiarism- It is a fraudulent act that involves different authors, linking words such as
claiming another person’s ideas, work, or in addition, again, similarly, and also are
publication. It is a form of intellectual property commonly used. On contrary, when
stealing and dishonesty that usually happens in contrasting two or more information, you must
scientific publications. There are four types of use phrases that highlight the contrast of these
Plagiarism. data. Critical notes must be observed to deliver
a) Copy and Paste Plagiarism- this type a good argument synthesis.
of plagiarism involves copying As a researcher, you must also take note that
information word-by-word without your research paper must be presented
giving due credit to the source. Copy in formally and academically manner. Writing
and paste plagiarism can be avoided must be kept clear and concise.
upon enclosing the borrowed words Objectivity must be observed and respect for
with quotation marks (“) and properly other’s works should be exercised. The
citing the author.
following are characteristics of a good literature
review:
a) Focused- your RRL must be composed of
information that is related to your research
topic.
b) Concise- ideas must be presented
economically.
c) Logical- the flow of ideas and information
must be based on logic. It should be smooth-
flowing.
d) Developed- your RRL must be composed of
complete information.
e) Integrative- in instances of combining
information, links between these ideas
must be evident. The contribution of the
reviewed materials on the topic must
also be shown.
f) Current- researchers must only use the new
and trendy information about a research topic.