English Language Journal Vol 4, (2011) 17-30 ISSN 1823 6820

REFERENCES Alderson, J.C and D. Wall (1993). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistic 14(2). Breen, M. P. (1987). Contemporary Paradigms in Syllabus Design, Language Teaching Special Feature (April). Breen, M. P. (2001). Syllabus Design. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. R. Carter and D. Nunan. Cambridge,Cambridge University Press. Curriculum Specifications (2003). Curriculum Development Center, Ministry of Education. Kuala Lumpur. Ellis, R. (1993). The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 27(1). Johnson, R. K. (ed). (1989). The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lawrence, L. (1995). Using Evaluation to Improve Teacher Education Programmes. Evaluation for Development in English Language Teaching. P. Rea-Dickins and A. F. Lwaitama. London, Macmillan. Maizatulliza Muhamad (2008). The Malaysian ESL Syllabus Document: A Case Study of Its Specifications and Implementation in the Classrooms. Bristol: Graduate School of Education. Richards, J. C. and T. S. Rodgers (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rea-Dickins, P. and C. Scott (2007). Washback From Language Tests on Teaching, Learning and Policy: Evidence from Diverse Setting. Assessment in Education 14(1). Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional Syllabus. London: Oxford University Press. Willis, D. (1990). The Lexical Syllabus. London: Collins Cobuild.

30