Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fisica Impulsiva en Ingles
Fisica Impulsiva en Ingles
1
3º. The perihelion of Mercury's orbit is given by:
drack
f ′s = f ′m forces alveolar
a′ a′
m s ∗ ns = mm ∗ mn s = sol ; m = Mercury
xs xm
a ′s m xn
α1 = = n ∗ sn
a ′m m s x m
donde :
α1 = variation of the perihelion
α1 = sec onds ∗ 1.296.000′′ ∗ 100 years
then :
3.30 ∗ 10 23 x sn
α1 = ∗ 1296000 ∗ 100 years
1.99 ∗ 10 30 x mn
2
3∗ 2∗
3
α1 = 21.4914572863 ∗
1
3∗
3
α1 = 21.4914572863 ∗ 2
α1 = 42.982914572611
Namely:
2
The frequency varies towards red, infrared photons andalusia
done.
γ 1 = 1.10γ c (1,2,3,4,5)
X En
CE = CS
X Sn
CE
=α
CS
X En 2
α= n =
XS 2 3
α = 3 = 1.73205080756º
3
The desire to build a house made of bricks falling up and
alienated is absurd.
String theory, global and so on. Provide no longer posed
perspective, there are no hidden dimensions.
I note that this brief introduction is only the first of a
series of avance work that I have and I will enter on the
Internet.
Your Truly
J.A.G.Ch.
4
Applying mathematics to increase non-linear and discontinuous
variable metric multiforme to a space within which there
isotropic energy level Planck radio.
We define:
δ = ƒ(xn)n
Then:
xn = M0 iD φ
M0 = drack module
iD = metric absolute drack
φ = sen, cos
mass
√3
1
Energy
√2
associated field
5
M0=n 3 M0 = 1, M0 = 3, M0 = 9, etc.
n
2 2
φ = Cosφ = , Cos nφ = n
3 3
1 1
φ = Senφ = , Sen φ =
n
n
3 3
iD = 3n n = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6, etc.
δc c c
=n γ here = 0 =c x n = Μ 0 i Dφ
xn x n
3
Key role
δc = n γ 3n = 1 x n = 30
n=1 isotropically
2πrxnλγ= γ
6
1
But here since λ = has to have the dimension of the radio
2π
Planck.
1
2πrx n =
2π
x n = 0.79 x10 3 M 0φi D
rx n = 8 24
2 2
= rx n x n = 0.79 x10 3 6 18
22
3
3 3
8
2 24 2 22
=10 −310,729.10 3
6
3
3 18 3
= 6.6263799116 x10 −27 erg .s.c0
Assuming drack space is made up by the drakianas space Planck
c
δ =n γ x n =1
xn
2πrλγ = n γ
n =1
2πrλ =
2πrγx n λ =n γ0
γ =1
γ0
r =
2πx n λ
r =1.61332743882 x1015 cmt
r =1.61332743882 x107 Kmt
7
Diameter that is comprised drack
But in conformity drack we have:
δc = n γ
n =1
2πrx n λγ = γ
2πrx n λ =
6.6263799116
λ=
6.28318530716
λ = 0.535803037009cmt
Así :
δc = n γ
n =1
δλγ = γ
x nδλ =
δ=
λx n
6.6263799116
δ=
0.535803037009 x19683
δ = 6.28318530727 x10 −31 erg
mass
√3
1
Energy
√2
associated field
8
δc =n γ
n =1
c
δ n = γ
x
δλγ = γx n
δλ = x n
δx n =field rotation fasor
m= xn m =δx n
λ
photon
E1 =6.28318530727 2 M =1
E1 =8.88572028853 gr.c / s.10 −31
2
E1 = 6.28318530718 3.10 −3
3
E2 = 15.3906203948 gr.c / s.10 −31
E3 = 51.0975267325.10 −31 gr.c / s
E4 = 165.400453161.10 −3 gr.c / s
9
1
Senφ = creates
3
Electron
δx n = 6.28318530718[36 ].2M 0φ
1 6
3 1 driver is the bone
δx = 6.28318530718 x0.729 x10
n 3
3 6 .2 in this area
3 3
312
Electron mass = 6.28318530718 x0.729 x 2
masa = 9.16088417786 x10 −28 gr
Proton
Proton
[ ][ ]
mp = 6.28318530718 x 2 312 x 313 313
mp = 6.28318530718 x 2.657205 x10 6 gr
mp = 1.669557114141x10 −24 gr
3: quark masses that you call
3: electron neutrino mass or
Neutron activity as drack
[ ][ ] [ ]
mn = 6.28318530718 x 2 312 x 313 x3 36
mn = 1.67094527404 x10 −24 gr
10
Furthermore we have to impulsivity drack decreased the effect
of group fasores up.
Modules and the speeds are acting fasores:
4
2 2
30 = 2 , 31 = 3 , 32 = 9 4 ,
3 3
6 8
2 2
33 = 27 6 , 34 = 81 8
3 3
c = 1.7014491868
c
c0 = n
x
1
1.7014491868 x10 34 x mt
100
1.7014491868 x10 32
mt
0.56337770478 x10 5
c1 = 3.020086120493 x10 27
c2 = 5.36067738369 x10 22
c3 = 9.51524587893 x1017
c4 = 16.8896386885 x1012
c5 = 29.9792457976 x10 7
c5 = 2.99792457976 x10 8 mt / s
11
30 = 1.41421356277
31 = 2.44948974279
32 = 8.16551183169
33 = 25.6656552736
34 = 78.9731234754
c 1.7014491868 x10 32
= fr =
c0 2.99786427756 x10 8
f r = 0.56754093487 x10 24 foton
12
Stefan-Boltzmann Law
δc = σεΤ4
c=1
σ = 0.567x10-4 erg.cm-2.grado-4.s-1
If this is a constant value must be maintained at drack
cm-2 ° drack-2
Photons have the temperature of formation
δc
Τ4 = ε =1
σε
6.28318530716 x10 −34 c
Τ4 =
0.567 x10 −4
Τ = 1.07454646258 ∗10 2
Τ = 107.454646258 0
K
13
As the speeds are a function of the spaces of drack:
c 1.7014491868
c0 = n = 1 1
x
2 2 2
( )
8 2 24 8
2 x0.729 6 8 24 3
3
∗10 3
3 3
1.7014491868 ∗10 34
c0 =
1.4218551598 ∗10 3
Speed electron
c3 = 1.19664030128 ∗10 31 cmt
6.28318530716 ∗1.19664030128
Τ4 =
0.567 ∗10 −4
Τ4 = 13.2605163297 ∗10 4
Τ = 19.0827125616 0 K electrón
λ f = 1.05462111716 ∗1.414213566273
But due to the reduction photonics
λ f = 2.46286912954 ∗10 −4 cmt
14
c
c = λγ γ =
λ
γ 1 = 6.92864817601 ∗ 1014 c / s violet light
γ 2 = 6.20691398797 ∗ 10 c / s
14
blue light
γ 3 = 5.62135606452 ∗ 10 c / s
14
green light
γ 4 = 5.13675640384 ∗ 10 c / s
14
yellow light
γ 5 = 4.72907732417 ∗ 1014 c / s orange light
γ 6 = 4.3813115033 ∗ 1014 c / s red light
γ 7 = 4.08125851264 ∗ 1014 c / s infrared light
γ1
= 1.11627906976 = R1
γ2
R2 = 1.10416666667
R3 = 1.09433962262
all R ≅ 1.10
Q λ
=
(x n )3 x n
(x n )4
Q=
λ
6.6263799116 ∗10 −27 ∗ ( x n ) 4
Q=
λ
15
6.6263799116 ∗10 −27 ∗2(0.729) 4 φM 8 ∗1012
Q=
1.05462111772 ∗10 4
Q = 3.54911402739 ∗10 −11φM 04
1 1
8 2 2 24 2 2
Q = 3.54911402739 6 18 24 3
3 8
( )
3 3
Q = 4.87901528331 ∗10 −11 g / cm 3 s to electron
δc = λ γ n =1
λγ λ
δ n = γ δ n =
x x
Si llamamos a:
δ = G( x n )
3
3 λ
G( x n ) n = N º n º Avogadro
x
Nº
G=
λ( x n )
2
16
But if we have to
Nº
G=
λ( x n )
2
G λ( x n )
2
=
Nº
The forces are training the and will be in the third and
coplanar coincident we must:δ forces
G xn ( ) δδN
2 2
λ
= δδN 2
Nº
Gδx nδx n N º = δNδN
λ
Gm1m2 = δ 3 N 3
17
f1 and having the third force tangent to the alveolar 90 of
these.
But the interaction between a mass drack and drakianas will
be:
λγ f
δ = γ δ=
xn x n′
fλ
n′
=
x N º xn
f = x n N º x n′ Nº xn = m
λ λ
f = mx n′ where a x n′ = d (i DφM 0 )
q=
λ
(x ) n 4
x1 x2
q1 q 2 =
λ
(x ) n 4
q2
q1 q 2 N º N º =
λ
( ) λ (x )
N º xn
4 n 4 f1 f2
Q1Q2 = f1 f 2 (x ) (x ) d
n 4 n 4 2
d 2 = x12 x 22
f1, f2 can be attractive or repulsive depending on the value of
these f
f1, f2 resulting from the forces acting according to its axle
loads can be attractive or repulsive depending on the shape
and position of fasores of drakianas.
18
1 1
(x )
n 4 4 8 2 2 24 2 2
= 2( 0.729 ) ∗1012 6 18 ( 3)
24
8
3 3
(x ) (x )
n 4 n 44
3 = 79.356703007c / s ∗10 24
ε 0 = 79.356703007 ∗10 24 c / s
Q1Q2
= f1, 2
ε 0d 2
f
But the electric field, E = then we have:
q
δc = n x n n =1
δc λγ
= γ δ = γ
xn xn
δ = f ( xn )
f f
λ = xn = xn
x n
x n
λ
We derivate about xn
19
( x )′
n f
= ∗1
(x )
n 2 λ
f
E= =
xn ( ) 2
λ = conformativ
q λ q
1.239852 ∗10 −6
V0 = = 1.1756373726 ∗10 −2 ∗100
1.05462111772 ∗10 4
V = 1.1756373726eV
131.587540692 131.587540692
V0 = ∗1 =
n ′
( )
2 2
x 1
− 8
1
∗ 24 ∗ 20 3 ∗ ( 3) 4
∗4 3
3 3
Derivate
Cosφ = −Senφ
V0 = −13.650613879eV
20
4 3
3
2
πγ = 4πγ 3 x n 0 ( ) 0 = radio eq.
γ 3 = 3γ 2 ( x n ) 0
2
( 3)
8
2 2
0 = 4 ∗ 3 6 24
0 = 11.1124669808cmt to
proton + electron
4
V = π (1.3307182 ) x n
3
3 3
( )
V = 4.18879020476 * ( 235.6450501) ∗ 10 −46 * (2.658663) 3 *1018
V = 18.5496963882 * 10 − 25
however
m
ρ= mass = m Volume = V
V
1.6695711414 *10 −24 gr
ρ=
1.85496963882 * 10 − 24 cm 3
gr
ρ = 0.90005308252 3 for hydrogen
cm
21
δ = f ( xn )
c
δ =n γ
xn
fm
δλ = x n = xn
(x ) n 5 λ
( )
fm = δ xn
6
1 1
8 2 2 24 2 2
( )
1
f m = 6.283185307 *10 −31 * 2(0.729) 6 6 8 24 3 2
3 3
− 31
f m = 6.283185307 *10 (0.15009463529) *1018 *1.65089130707
f m = 1.55691003883 *10 −13 dinas
field
√3
1
Energy
√2
associated field
f m = ϕ 0 effort magnetised
f
f m ⊗ δ = ϕδf m ⊗ = ϕ 0δ
xn
f q
fm ⊗ = ϕ0
x n
xn ( ) 3
( )
fm ⊗ f xn
2
= ϕ0q
22
but V=volumen=v 2
fm ⊗ q
f ( x) 2 = ϕ 0
V V
f m ⊗ f ( x)
2
q
2
= ϕ0
v s 0
fm ⊗ f xn ( )
= ϕ0 I
1
2
2
v 0
q
=I
s
fm ⊗ f xn( ) 2
= ϕ 0 i
fm ⊗ f (x ) n 2
= ϕ 0i0φ
a 90 0
f γ = ϕ 0i0φ
v=
s
I
=i
Se
S e = seg
= 0φ
φ = senφ cos φ
23
Now if we consider that
c
δ n =n γ n =1
x
q
xn
ϕ
=
(x ) n 3
=
1 ϕ E
= = V0
qd qd (x )
n 2
d qd q
ϕ( xn )
2
ϕ 1
V0 = voltage V0 = = =
qd ( x n ) 2 d q
V0 q ϕ 0 x n
=
( ) 2
s = área
q
=I
s s s
ϕ (xn )
2
ϕ ϕ0 n 2 ϕ
V0 I = 0
s
Vo ICos
Se
=
s
( x ) Cos
Se
ϕ0 n 2 ϕ0
V0 i cos ϕ =
s
(x ) γ s
= magnetic excitation
γ n 2
fmc
= γx n fm = (x )
xn c
( )
fm = δ xn
2
24