Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14 Consolidatnvi
14 Consolidatnvi
--
I32)
r-
I,A021
S/L5
61/-s
04 7.1
-TL-n,
ap t f)
2, Al
P', Z
Cinc ///6h/y
"t','"
C4A(
4 .,
Cyrnic So,
x n I_ dC4 I
C(4C4 (e4.1 9w
(4 14
. P3 , 4,,
p -r Fh,
3. Coll/apjg
1C/E/
. C/ /2
' c ~d hz c dA
Sovi/
F5 /- 4
s
d Ep4an/ve
Owuw.r
Co(A
4
FA,
Cd"~ 11
o/k
cZ
,C/,r 3,
//o/iV:
r-5
on ,
&wivL
4, A. c4wAu
L4s
Pmt
(#^p&c4/
CayJ
ct
Rt
RsldadSoi/
4 sa,,, tdc }4fwkn~t
RI
, e 6
/9C '~~a
A,4l L "
V/- V/2
Vcrv'd Cay
V/,2 " v'"
V3 -/2 / 4.
/k&ercnccz
+44I,4a4,
(OddkJ
NtC 49
-1. 3116 31
I3 /, 322
31,11
HqAIV
SUC&'CCIY,5et7-5 / Av'e
C/OY5
Aqri -/yo/es A
<-i
OF/Yn ceennd
r /(wCA cc/
ItmP
0
Su 53
4L /coM
/n s,/ = I
i
/
Ak-F: /jCprc:,
f~J
/9
sy -y 4
-----r_
Zeoue;l
vc -IV 6 - Utt" O
/5/4-,
b E > 4EOP
/ qC
I
I. F
I.
>
( )
r~~~
W
-,0 -9 -s -7 -6 -5
.IF
C!'",U Wu . i pC
gc CA
~ep~~~
Q eV
/o
/f7 5,j
I
[
II
I
[
i
I
/og , (/S)
10-11 10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
70 50 10-11 10-10 10-9
90 ' , kPa v 70 100 80 60 80 60 40 CRS Creep MSLp MSL24 In situ v= 10% Effective stress - strain rate relations observed in the laboratory and in situ at a vertical strain of 10%. Vasby (4.3 - 7.3 m) Saint-Alban (3.1 - 4.9 m)
40 CRS Creep MSLp MSL24 In situ Preconsolidation pressure - strain rate relations observed in the laboratory and in situ.
0 0
120
40
' , kPa v
80 ' vF
120
4 v, % 8
12 2
? ?
6 v, %
'vF
?
10
1960
1968
14
'vF
18
1979
0.8 1 0.4 2 4 6 8
20 10 Sensitivity contours
-0.4
0.01
0.1
10
100
Pr,
-
/,1a
3/j3
E I
,fI 13 7
3/f9 715
rD;) P11
, /
3/%
//
Arocctol)
' /'%u
h
r5,07eaO02
vtMp
lk1 C,
CcKC
C?
(PI,/ a
ri.bf
1)
d Enip& - Tv d AC/C
<<<
-44
:3-CCC1
VVV .. VI
f >H
1.Y 20/f,
'a -
i/f
64,
A p wr
OC
2. Cia sca
))Tt
(#7144
Aol,
~ I
It@F
/ndc PpLrhL
40 - soo
trll
6)
Go~eh-r vt ,Ih .
fou
t WY
2)
d~i:,t
/6AA4
CkAt
fD 67ur' W9
t)
200
0
t,. f u\
3) Crreloli/l)n wi
way ( P3)
w1t )
.-Ln o - G 5
w0, ( .)
(Asrm D 2974)
7.
Yt ( C)
300
/ boo
7. kP
/,03
i
A
( (
/I/1gq ' sI
r
/-
322 _ ,
'let
kPC -ETs -
3/'?6 3
3- (eono/,/a
U)
A
(/-O):
Genfml oq Aavlur
*O/4 tr'
*P4 cE 'S Cp4 4.~ Au~b.ce 4 (7+) (a1v Pe, Fg.i /)
--
Cmre.5sli'lliy
gxtal
E
I t= .
Ovo
o..
00B
-1
OCC
...
>/0,
.t i
Cf lS
C4 o 4
07 e
A~
(DM-7 4/)
cV d4
4 4S4,
t4
of /-2
I-n
n'd4t4 h4 oe 1
< O~~/-9, y /09 0;CI~~
/k)
(sc P4b)
~1
*
~La~~VC U984)r
ci Ir <0 = 1 -o2
r 2;<e
k dtGC4ea
"I AAb
I I
2 t /s- k - 3
ywPI -omwsa/r
/ ,0-/
"t
..
C# CLAI
~~7ypTy
C,
cI 0 Y
-3
l
I
4. C77rnftng Etlc
, ,i
g ,4
kib \
eq b 0
21 ). /
SeFft/1rte
r< , 4As
'43P4a
.
a tn (r&
... , (, 4
C,c
/eE
,t97TER,91DEFORe9Vhl
(ay/orect)
CL
3/ 4
/'
".3
I.I
/t0
8o
C
40
N
'M
N-
'20
0
:3.0
iR 5
Xx
XII<K11 I
_
-II
Io
fit.<.
ok,.
MwvkagEngr.
6s I
.t' vw
i
A/doc
O'Y74)
I
19 "
A
-, fV
-f.,I / i :iI
.N
.
, I I
!!
1I
I-
20
- ::-I Q i0 -
-=
/I /I//
F . .
/
v -
Wc~rWat 1Wor
Cownocloi,
9zt
11/
/O 10
/500
/VDIX PPPepf45pE q1
I-
-a
-1
r
I
-,
I
9,
.. ~j
t ..! : .:
k-
d
I, a:
o.4
UI IK)
k'
0..2
b'i) co'-/#
-13045 I,!f I dao
w
-i,) .o <
.
I
i. . _
. er,
_ *
0-
* ,
. *
I
,
'IVG
.
From L,Cosogrnde
(/9z)
.j3 '1%.1
tl
'\6
M2/'S
10
10 8
Cc 1 Peats Clay and silt deposits
Clay & silt deposits Peats from literature (table 1) Middleton peat
6 Ck 4 2
Ck = eo/2
0.1 10
100 Wo, %
1000
Ck = eo/4 0 5 10 eo 15 20 25
Values of natural water content and compression index for peats as compared to those of soft clay and silt deposits.
Values of Ck for peats as compared to those of soft clay and silt deposits.
0.05 0.04 C /(1+eo) 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 C / Cc = 0.052
Cc /(1+eo) Relationship between secondary compression index and compression index for Middleton peat.
O3 49 (eL 4//q9 -2
1322
P5Ul-
3/4M
/A /7T/
.
COMOI//om (t'o)
I I
w/TIHSE77TLEA/T
jF
i 1
OOC
<< "ID
%,
OG5
_
-77
Z-Z no d1
.
'-Z'_'I
2
oll
f -Id
(cui rafi
v
I_ 1. l
,
I
.I
I
I . . II ,
AH) 4I
(C(Eipii4oA. c'
Wi)
_-I
71T ,,z ,,
490 ~n ~
, 11 nc~:;
bjHLO O1 bO//Orn -
Cvc (s s)
10 /2 14. 1
/'/sc '
?" /.Om
gb . o87cn
3 (m)
fi
Cvrl17,1ani Fv
fn f .c
Corrtedd C
Lj.
C.
t VU.LU
p/,
, 4
vy
er
/f cfo I
rr
I
rv I_
i ~i
<
(2>r
l r J r
KJJ
Q CCUL ,U kU 0
((ss s
.) 7 8
A"4-7l)
* /g,//>t/;/>6/26I)
0
<.<
10
20
o 40
so
70
80
/06
I( 33c
.vv
~zz
to
.5 =0oo 70 a
...
rc
"IR
ee ... i,
%.
Z<e aI~I
7o
IrO
h.PO
-I~
0 rd 2.
lj
j!aw i
c 1";
I
Aek d ;AA p :,
ppc -
Y-P"414-
co//O-P-51)g I
, !
Wi-
/) 4
, e
-7
CL lC. Uz,p)w r
,)
4orss (
4"
4a )
5S
m.#/,
at"-, 4 kJ
-s
- CcWCa46
-
"6r' - a+
r v
adcas
Y~~v bs
Fad 3) cA "sfz Zi
&4tkuuoiCII~
tI
/ X.) .It _
,^/'LJX cncj ,
.I
' I
.-
,l/q
3/o
i)~,sak
A x_
5s rj4 ue,
_ _ __,,_,-jv
!1 vd/7
4 4fpJ
'r\ Stt \
.4) 544hleStu4.
V 0'3C -2n
:2:2: = I, .X. ,n2.
-Cl
*~fVrkfp
' ai
a 1U T
I ZI
.1 i W
Seanj o
1 L
Ict 4 d4
,dt 5 5, 4) "IT.43E IM 4
)q, - .- Y
Zs//
(4dC9s)
or%
7*2X1ny
t". I <S
P/41r
$ .-
,h, II
A rf
q-
('('/
- --
Mz/
,3(1 [I
Lr'. -
I /. 32 2
'rt'
"'-
'
"
06
LI
.3, _fXpqn,5lvt
Clt?~As
e
G cnrd
ci
5 SA't
'o, Ua6
(/9q/): ;,
20
"I
... UIv
V Z
II CC VV I
V
/5
(o aopts) ( it 301if S) /o
5-1o/y 5/'
d,a
. t' 0
h,
4M,14,C &je ,-ws 4A/9tc~ 5;~cr
S^44 ( 5 ,>
~~~/O
20
130
40
74+ #/ f
2) I//&4Adl 0 S 6a
)
uAa/c
ktWAw
l5EFlBfE
0a)
EvA port
-------
t
,
(+)
1o I a -6
/arE':
'V&aQr
7?,
-4Y'
;44444 . d4.4.,
Ce
#/z/H9
1.322
rC/F'
/
...
,,,
OGCe
_zI
vlog
o7oo
\ -iTPI
-
0,
nii I
I
I I
I m
I I
0,s
4-
/09 Gv
15Saps (At eocJ ceoM)
/9 TV (Q&)
/t 3 -c,
4)
'U4
c~
dA
'
WY 7 P. u8IJ/<aD a 14, 4f
+sav
cOv6 <A
Aedud~jet
nt 44ia.' wi 60tS me? anrn ~n/'7: 5Jfna~ma of UftI .qMbwalnow AecC c#v4 n h&4 0 & 1 0 -o aj4, 6, ctj Wtvlz 4A if fv #,a CA Cdwn *Lk Wr ot
P and EA:mm
400 200 0 EA J F M
A P
EA D
Month
Malaysia
P and EA:mm
400 200 0 EA P J F M A M J J A S O N
Month Melbourne, Australia Water Deficit Water Deficit
B EA P D
P and EA:mm
400 200 0 EA P J F M A M J J A S O
Water Deficit
EA P N D
Month
Johannesburg, SA
P and EA:mm
400 200
D EA
Water Deficit Water Surplus Water Deficit EA
P 0 J F M A M J J A S
Month
P O N D
Cape Town, SA
Illustrations of different types of atmospheric water balance: (A) Kuala Tahan, Malaysia, 1984; (B) Melbourne, Australia, 30-year average; (C) Johannesburg, South Africa, 1987; (D) Cape Town, South Africa, 1992. EA, A-pan evaporation; P, precipitation.
ftlk
/ 321
114v*"
b06
31;431VI
'a
0E 0 U)
dC zw
0t)
4
FIG. 1 Climatic Ratings (C.) for Continental United States
'adjZ4s
; &nAh 1
sa' 5
.e Acp
A * P/&,l
(ARC te wri/f )
S i
~ A,*~ figu,,,
, av
Pwry
VJ---
#e~
Ail
24,
off
it
f/
/ /
? ~ 4 CA ~
Maize Elevation above datum:m 1445 1440 1435 1430 1425 1420 14150
Eucalyptus
WT
18m Dry
Dry 800
Dry
Dry
100
900
WT 7
Dry
4m
10m
Dry
100 200
Position of piezomters
station terrace
Base of Alluvium
WT
1420 Top of sandstone 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100 12001300 C Horizontal distance: m
Water table depression beneath eueatyptus plantations: (a, b) near Johannesburg; (c) at the site of a power station near Johannesburg. Plazometers Bedrock Water cable
10 Depth: m
20 Measurements of heave with depth, indicating a depth of active zone of about 30m.
Site I: Heave after 9-8 yrs. Site II: Heave after 3-6 yrs.
30 Water content: % 0 15 30 45
2 Depth: m
3
Oct./Nov. 4 (end day season) Israel za = 5m
5 Seasonal changes in water content observed under the shoulders of an airport pavement in Israel.
Figure by MIT OCW.
c) Long time to reach maximum swelling (than seasonal effects) Note significant rise in WT
Surface heave movements and a rise of the water table that occurred as a new water balance was established in a recently urbanized area
Movement (mm)
20
1"
-20
6 8 10
10'
Rainfall (mm)
200 100 0
FMAM J JA SOND JFMAM J J A S OND JFMAMJ J A SOND
Month Seasonal variations in surface movement and water table depth for an old building in Cap Town
CO 3n,19P. I --Y I
1.32L
'
&ad.., -----Lw~ll.
-'
-*S6/46
E}
A1'bDQ#r/oA1 -A6/&
OA/ EXP4IS/Ve
l7401
eld
-
&4i ZS . -gP
tk PtA &v
Eri c<ccce
bLu
A,
'--"5I ---'
"-s
;?
BI
I___
01
M-lccdt
"
-A, 44r~b
8.Palr/ia
5oe
d) PAgtwe s
Af p kdUe1
W/4+
asL on
~cuWd
4ul 0
Wgo
MU. (1q?2)
tp->, x
fS~le
I
I
l
4A ''-'
' f J
"'
et
,,322
'--
("p-I
.
~ ~
}---I
3/27/9i
Y*
/. id&ckgrowd
/)
du1,/ oi 3
s
,2) CbrgdAo
C " 1t
-
*"
C ce
Sc/; d(,)
-'
/_F,_
mcU
"od"
zmL-M //
) z
-
e.
I~
2)
b 4SLCGLI
..o
sS)
i,
.k
3 c) C4A 4
* 4
*u
,
7~
ak k
_ _
of
Se.WM6
wiY ShT
or
At1f4,
(R4)
AA /6APaJ" / 4
6?
(Q-Ya)+ fwe-Ww)
(i
D~na~ c
yZs~4 unef@ r/ I 2
1.0
1.2
Residual soil = in situ weathering of rock to produce soil. Composition of Tropical Residual Soils in Warm-Wet Climates
(1) Crystalline rock and poor drainage + smectite (2) Crystalline rock and good drainage + Red Laterites (also called Oxisols) Kaolinite plus Fe/Al. oxides (reddish color) Low "activity" with a lot of cementation Considered "good" MH soil
(3) Weathering of volcanic ash/rock + Andisols Halloysite (tubes + spheres) plus amorphous. alumina & silica (very high SSA but low surface charge) and maybe smectite (usually dark color) Generally 2.0 high wN and P.I. Considered "poor" MH soil
CHARACTERISTICS OF RED RESIDUAL SOILS (LATERITES) WHICH OFTEN REQUIRE DIFFERENT ENGINEERING PRACTICE (Compared to saturated sedimentary clays). Index Testing and Correlations with Atterberg Limits (See Mitchell & Sitar, 1982, for examples).
Halloysite
2.1
(1)
(2)
Tubular structure
Fe & Al. oxides plus silica gel act as strong cementing agents. Decreases effective SSA Highly variable in situ
Panel discussions and Proceedings ASCE GED Spec. Conf. on Engr. and Construction in Tropical and Residual Soils, Honolulu, Hawaii, Jan. 1982 (Availab.e from ASCE).
- 2 -
(3) Drying soil generally increases amount of cementation and reduces plasticity. (4) Amount of mechanical remolding can greatly affect measured Atterberg Limits (more remolding + increased plasticity).
(5) Conclusions
(1) Profile characterized by differential weathering and cementation. See Brand (1982) for classification system for Hong Kong. (2) Because of above, properties highly variable and
(3)
Undisturbed sampling difficult to perform Conventional size samples don't reflect mass properties Base design on local experience and/or large in situ testing
Conclusions
2.3
Saturation - Rainfall (1) Strata'ofmain interest usually occur above the water table and are characterized by: Partial saturation
(2) How to define a in partially saturated soils? tinuous air voids) . Otherwise, must consider two components, i.e. a =
fl(a-ua) + f 2 (ua-uw)
(3) Variation in uw greatly affect slope stability . . Seasonable variations Effect of heavy rainfalls Influence of modifying drainage pattern
CCl _
3/3o/Rn
I, IV
/ 322
So//./,q
vo,
.)
/rti/ ,, (/?77) (1 Z"As c5. e //e iJ n'cJ,L,,/SoX/," A/SCc, J'CFS/ V/o 03, GT7, p, . /97-2/./
I oC reSclu/l O//
e/ IQernorpA4crock
M osf/y JM /v ML ftflwolr
/?commnd A
c/J/,t?
C,
30-7o/
f..
I
leM * /7
z- /Z E5'A 3
=p, (/4enarc/ressur,,zjc
prox, A/vs.
fco.f
M, cor(fc0/on
'& 'V
/n graar
IA'
?,oJc/olfd 7
VCE.
2000 _
,,.
I.
80o
CC Arx.i s
,/
/I
rI
Loo
h I
?x
w~~_
/00
,f
L /
/~~~~~~~sa
8o
IDo
4o
I
20
/O
I i
x\I
i i
2o
-4
/o
--
II
I
1
20
40 o0
8c/Oo
i I
I I
I I
2OO
460 6o
/1
A/ (/ovs/f/:
Aor- -/2,;.)
1.2 155 Tests, 50 Sites Southeastern USA 1.0 Compression Index, Cc Sowers 94% Range 0.8 0.6 0.4 DIB 1985 0.2 0 Sowers, 1963 Best Fit
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.0 62 Tests in One Site Northern (Tropical) Brazil Compression Index, Cc 0.8 Sowers 1963 0.6 0.4 0.2 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Void Ratio B. Basalt, Quartzite, Schist Gneiss: DIB 1985 Relationship Between the Void Ratio and Compression Index in Residual Soils Derived from Crystalline (Igneous and Metamorphic) Rocks.
N 0 25 50 75
Pinnacle Slot
Rock
Residual Soil Profile in Limestones Residual Soil Settlement Related to the Weathering Profile
N 0 25 50
Weathered
Rock
Rock
Weathered
Partly
Partly
N 0 25 50
N 0 25 50
PED
Rock
Sandstone, Conglomerate
Rock
Weathered
Mudstones, Shales
C 4LA/2/B4
/.
Y"A*VED CLAYV
Co/t
(<<
See Y3 (Fg,2)
A
See V8 (l.
300
X=
1.7. ooc
_-, :I'll;
z
V ///////
kI
-.
it
'e
e
, LI i<Z _`
W(
2) Co
Cod Arm. k
A
7cu~e
idtfti (o'awK A
A
'
b44I"'y X'c
(4 x
BEs; dryin"
vrC: /
'
ve
Irnol
;vt
f',.fr)
a"r"p-"
Gn/n
.C; .
ci4
t .,~ ( V6)
C (vs) S J
-o
p. -/s
(N ffWl/y fO s)t
t W444t &thalt do)
4a cnl4
3(5'
IVIIFFQxd-o/X
C_ 4/ib
.322
----
3. Anl7Ijoroec F/owi
(. h..r
2) 4 d4[
's~
v(
c
rk R
y.
4
(z
( du)
kcv
e;kh
r- ,
Y/kv
2)
2S s
c
(
. // (ac c-/)
1(Cv "~lilii~ Ch 1 I 1H Ffith i77 77-4--17M7--I ,. r 1
v\/
Ota4AA
,1
~~ C4 ~ ~~44cvit 7 m
t4,-,t
4Aav ,5."A A AUAC~,
Sn4-144
b)
a
' 7X
Ii 1 T 7 Y lL,
F r r
"" I__"I'
__
/
~4d
k
OVA44<xch,4t k h
th 0I-:1 [F,1 tV
Ccd/
4
,
A?4 ~*l r
/01
0<
F191-1
a)
1-1
,iXA "
,411 , 4k
- r 3
AL l"" '
C)
1,V
4) Re,'sut,
8Cm/i8~y
/
.NJ
* C." V
b 06Lkloc
ta
t
to i a
/< tY
>> 4
}
A-_
V8
10
Gradual
5 V4
V3 V2
}
Fairly Abrupt 40 50 60 70 80 Natural Water Content WN (%)
V1
30
Notes: 1) V1, V2, etc. refer to separate varves 2) Sample from Northampton, Ma., WN = 56.7% 3) Data from Ladd and Wissa (1970) Water Content Variation within a Varved Clay from the Connecticut Valley
Figure by MIT OCW. Adapted from:
60
Plasticity Index, PI %
40
20
20
Note: Range shown for varved clays having wL >30 % for bulk material Plasticity Chart for Typical varved clays from Northeastern United States.
60 40 Liquid Limit, wL %
80
100
Vertical Strain v
u = zero
tp
t IOt
C= v/log t
Log Time t Strain vs. Log Time from Incremental Consolidometer Test Showing Effect of Load Increment Ratio (N.C. Clay)
Figure by MIT OCW.
4
A
8 Vertical Strain v, %
12
B
A C
B D
16
C D
20
24 0.1 0.5 1 2 5 Consolidation Stress vc, TSF 1 TSF = 95.8 kN/m2 Type of Test 24 hr. Incremental CRSC WN (%) 36.2 50.2 61.9 65.4 0.2 10 20
Curve
A B C D
Location ChicopeeHolyoke
... . _ . : , ./OA7.it;
t
_,
i
I
' '~
I i
--
.. I
, .. .. _
____. ....
i , I: .. 7- t .- Oq
' }
L..... _ ]Z : ~ _: _.
r1 _!+. I'
T I I-r n r -4-.
I
r T
t-I
i ; I
t t,'tttt I TTT
'.r
t-+-.+
. ..
c.. ....
.__'1-I . -7"1I
..
.ik lW~.~ar.-t..~!'r.,=~
.I, -7,-,--,
--;. .-.. . .
. .. . . . .a
-- 1
....l~l r
L 14i
:.lt Il ...
47,
i..
-t
i
!-,t
-i : .
........
I-;-
..
o.'-stI
c-,
tl -1; zr -.or/ o~~~r;H~ +Nr , i ' " i i i-lI ;1ttirf +4 t~~~~~ 4iw -;,
t-1.4. T-
Ttc
[-
I-,
-r'l11T'' Y-
......
........
........
,-l-r+---4--F . ...., I~ -i t
I .^
L:
,-X-i,
O.r-kI[-"/,,l'""
' '
''{
: .....
..
.I; ~ +
,~ii
'_'tF+ ' ,
"'t~F
~ ' I-
.:._l:_i,
'T
.....
1
>4
..
4.
..
r~ ......
- ..
ic-
I II I I L
4 fiQ4_
'
,-.,
.....
. ;..
r ..
-t+-t v!
.,.
.*--4
, - 7-
m .
I-
-. .,
,'~~r-
. .:1~
iI
.-
.I.T !:ll T T-
t ri 11(t flT
I I
Ill
.l~,.i.
.L~-)-
I - -F--t !
-1
it oT+4;
-
ttt1-
fi
3-i4
: II -gT,
'l'
!'-
-H
I
,... . _ -
I - i :-tl,
:"i" I
_-._,_...
__ *
t-At;-''
....
..,; :+..J.;
r-i--.:~r-.-i-i.i,
. '
'--I-
|I
-i-c-,-
, r : j!
'
i4W~r~o Le.
'"t'r---~[-
--
I. ,'
, '
-;-F-
., I Il _
I
: .: I
i
.. i..t-,. I
im ]
-I
..
;, . . J..:..._. ; :!-_-l. ,-.. ., -;'-i=-L :---. I-i-. ..i l' i .(..1.. .J.. l~' . '
.., n ..
! I.... ''
I. l-
"i
.... .
-.
_.
i;
.I
I ..
r -
_-t.
i ri L. ;-
'-t-i+-
-i :4
.IT
~~(-L
'
i-
. l
_-_,
-T-1-1 :
.-.....
-i
1-. I...
..
''I--l-'T' '.
4-f-f
--
. ;.... T,-j ~' - .. . . O :-'r.-;.. . ", I -T__ -'I ii' -. 'T _ .li __ _... @~-__ *_1, ! 1:2
I:;_J t:I 71. I It- - I I
.1
' ;'.-r
t+
T-----
, . -:f-, -. -...
-i
i It . . i. i
. i
b)-rr
'I''''''
I - . .. + 1 8
Tt
t.
-
L-_
T -4
Y'
-L.
I i-
".I
. . lrr
_l
mm
H.
I o
,! 1 L.
t-:t
I
. . . '; I
I
I
rt.
t.
l .
i I I
l [
.
!!!L
.1
T:
'l I
- t I,
I- - .
-!-I .--.
'4
~ 1 , t'I
!.
. -.
-.--.
I-
| ,
.
I
..
.
.
.. ,
-i-r_! I
r IIl ! I. ; ! I
.-
'
.
'I
. ._.
*'i :~
r. :I
'
.
...
._._,~ ,b---i-'m' * .,
'', I I' I I I
[ 'l
T -.
-- --,
i.-:,.,
I
. I
?'
'
. .
,.;:.:.....j........... :...S..,.L
:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.'
-. ....
.
.' #oF._#
'
.. .- ;ri - ,.i..,
-. or..r: ?.}::I A7,~ t~~~V ' :1........ CONv.;TrT, oVvrTER W~.' uR~ i::l: ....... i ... ...... i .... i .... ,-' .. i,4',
I
_.,
*-ll~l 0.--.
..
l
.
i:
...... 1 ......
.o.. . .
.
............. ;
..
.'
. . . . . . . . .
........ :'.
:FI'XFRtT6'V/RG/):
' . ' . . . .
.......
.... ........
....
' i *Azr ..... . ...
4 i ..
' ' ......... I.....-* ;'I * *I @@wi ... . --........-'--t ,: :: ::::: : ::: ::: : : : : : : ................... .. ... , . ... I ........ ,,I ..:............ '..'......:-....... ...... ... ,.;.. ..... ....... .,'":, ..........!.. ......... i,"" . ... .'' ... .. .... ..
. t j.it~ . ; . . . . . ., , ....
.J.Lt LINC
.~~ _ _ .
*
*X1s
:.. IiBl~r . -~Ln Irti. e (Q tSo-#-85c _j -i ' ' .* ' [ : : 1 :CZ4Y3: .... . .... :AltM ..... ...... .... ....... ; : .... .... . .. : .. I.. .... ........
. .. .. . . ....... ..
..
I...
....
r...
/.l
ALIIf&C
10
641
10 8 6 4
0.2
0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 30 Type of Test CRSC & Increm. CRSC & Increm. Increm. CRSC Increm. by GZA
** **
Cv vs. WL DM-7
80
Location* Amherst, MA. Northampton, MA. E. Windsor, CT. Secaucus, N.J. New Jersey
Coefficient of Consolidation (Vertical Drainage) vs. Natural Water Content for Normally Consolidated Varved Clays
* See Ladd (1975) for data sources ** From square root time method 1 ft2/day = 0.093 m2/day
rk = Kh/Kv
50 20 10 5 2 1 Case B Case A
5
Kc H
10
20
500 1000
Kc Ks
Case A
Ks
hs=0.5H
Relationship Between Kh/Kv Ratio and Permeability of the Silt and Clay Layers
Figure by MIT OCW.
1.5
t50(2-D) t50(Terzoghi)
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
H/B
1.5
2.0
2.5
(a) Effect of Lateral Drainage on Rate of Consolidation from Different Theories with Isotropic Permeabilities
Strip Load H/B = 1 Double Drainage 0.75 t50(2-D) t50(Terzoghi) Note: t50 = Time required for U = 50% at the centerline of the load
0.50
0.25 0 0 10 20 30 40 50
Kh/Kv
(b) Effect of Anisotropic Permeability Ratio on Rate of Consolidation for H/B =1 with Double Drainage
Vertical drainage only Uv for cv = 0.1 ft2/day 12 in. Dia. Sand Drains Uh for ch = 1.0 ft2/day Average Degree of Consolidation Uv and Uh, % 0 20 1 in. = 2.54 cm 1 ft. = 0.305 m 1 ft2/day = 0.093m2/day
40 60 S = 10'
15'
20'
Hd = 25'
50'
80 1yr 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 Time (days) 5yr 10yr 5000 50yr 100yr 20000
100
Effect of Sand Drains on Rate of Consolidation of Normally Consolidated Varved Clay with ch/cv = 10
mo
o% r-I
'-i -01,r C~
Ln >1 r H
He-
~~~~~~~~ N o CD D
q-4 >1
)
4o
^ (V _O b o r to
t
)
.O
AZV
En
Ho) H H~ a
wy uy an
9
fl
U)
U)~~~~~~~~~~~
X o
n~ 0 .-- 4~~~O1 0 coc 4-) hn (V X U Og 0) ~ f1 'tI4J
torx
4i 0 _
oX
O
U a)
)
>1
4r
0
'l
3 H
:~ 0).
.N 43,--
*A U ~ n~.o tO c n. F
to
to
lw >U) 0
)c .44
4-4 )w 44
*rq
*.
0 0)
UH
H O *-~ 0) 00) H
i 1
4I
NW O4) *-
.:: IZ0 .: a U) :2 EI
0t ,
14
H 430
0) H0 4)i r-, N vr *d ~ -
U 43V)
I ,
5
0 o *)EJ .
(o
H 4)
(r E *dN
w 0
co - 0) a. n - r4E r 40 4 N4
H O
ED N4
H H
( 44
44 0
n OE ,t:) *d c4)
0
0 0 .
mE
)-H
0. ~
. 0 O(
'
[i 4
IL) D~ U) an
OnH3 0
0) OO 0) 4) t . 0
a.,-J . > , ~ 0 V 0 It ( z c Z H .- Xn P H
O 4-) 0 0 n- 0 .
O -H: E 4)0
44 0 H 0
*H
O 0
'd
O oHr'-
EC
H
0 > )
N
' C -
40
4)
U)U)
4
El) u U)
U
4-)
0 ID 04 M
4 H
u) a)
0)
0) 0)
4)
a)
*4 U
U)
W
.t
QH
:
4)
:3
0) -
UO
Es
1
44
(L) E
to
0 )
00
0O
*H0O%*4
4)0
4) E
4 0_
_ ) 0 0)
0
*H(~.H
0)40 4) -0
.j
ro
00)
H*HN
.QO
4) g*4
*HtU
H O... *H
4) En*H
a
4
0
OH 0
OH
O N-O 4J-r
H
co
11
OO
0
0
0)(.
r
O H
()
H
04 E
cO
0)
V
.
roSH 4) 0
4)
.0
H
.O ON
P
4)
N* P -r
U4 0
0:-.
roO
NO
~ 4
O
4) o4
OO 0
N
4ON
_ N
A
H U)0H P U .
AV k (H 0 )
CY
U UH N p t OH 00
.. o *P
i
4
C;
Qv 4- 4
(-H O
-
0 4
*H
-N
P N)
4.
N0)H
...
V
>
N: g'
cp
O O(d
H '0
O 0
U
>
(d0
0 M
O LA
u Ln
(O
0
4) V *HH i
WD .t
w * 0)
H4)
.. *.
_-I
Table C-1
-
_,& .L -
z u
a' 0 [*
rl ,-I
aW
Vi H
r2 02
Pro
A
0) >4 H te In Iq
N P4 *
Cf
%
N -
COY
oD
0a
CO
.
0
C)
.o
; -~
H _4 +| 0)
4
a =
> h
C.).d
o3
0 U)
tdu)
V)
r..
0
*d 4I
N
fu l
o 4
4+,
M42
4o
+1 (
,.
'
00'.
+ ,. 1+
+jn C
LO%>1H 4 ?
co
vq OV
'4
H
~~*0 ~ >O
o,
I-
0, . n2
J 4 C + 1
CO +
>0>
,_
tO1
oo o.I
0 to
0 H
>4
I- H
r.4
o o .jW4 t f W W4 ,a 0., 0
2 W
a) r. E4-'D
I
0) 14
>4a-'
U 0
) C
o(
0J
*
to Cl -
0 .&J
o :
S k
L-2 Table C
0c t
t0)
Ci ) Z E
00c
153
CzL 3/3,/,
4/84 ~2
5 Q'nc s
0/7 3/83
3/P,
/, 32z :
Cnsold4A;
PRo3LE7 SO'ILO
fZ7,rcncrs Ort
8,h/50;/5
- A/t i2 5 OqoOCJ Al 5 .C(/Ss4) &arrAi ' 3)'V w ' sce' MLeMCh ze, F w'o/ ) (C/q8 alej
c'l
7 geaaG7~
1I &
Cd
5) ~) A/~/)
",.u. fOIL C
.'#
-4-e
' -
V'S AT/V
BR
'2 /b
(/q8)),
c - C4sJ
or
AWo - CwtaX,W/el
3) 41dAl (/92)
ar da ) / 3Z hd,
c4
:2)~aw)a F;.
d C Varv2)
4i, l(/YS),e
66 - ,g,,14-o
V, edl r' VS4C6 41
',t #W q7 -77-2/ oi K -
/ a d d ( 487) c e A/ MI /tY
Foad(/77)