Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Comparative Static Leakage Power Analysis of 4T and 6T SRAM Cells

    Uploaded by

    Kumarak Kannan T
    8 views14 pages
    This document compares the power consumption of 4T and 6T SRAM cells. It describes the basic structure and operation of each, with 4T SRAM using 4 transistors and 6T SRAM using 6 transistors. Simulation results showed that the average power consumed by the 6T SRAM cell was 0.87 mW compared to 0.023 mW for the 4T cell, representing a 29% power savings for the 4T design. The document concludes that a comparative power analysis of the 4T and 6T SRAM designs allows for optimized area and control over speed.

    Original Description:

    This project compares the Power Leakage of 4 transistor and 6 transistor SRAM design. 4 Transistor SRAM design reduces the area as well as dynamic and static leakage power.

    Original Title

    Static Leakage Power

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the power consumption of 4T and 6T SRAM cells. It describes the basic structure and operation of each, with 4T SRAM using 4 transistors and 6T SRAM using 6 transistors. Simulation results showed that the average power consumed by the 6T SRAM cell was 0.87 mW compared to 0.023 mW for the 4T cell, representing a 29% power savings for the 4T design. The document concludes that a comparative power analysis of the 4T and 6T SRAM designs allows for optimized area and control over speed.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views14 pages

    Comparative Static Leakage Power Analysis of 4T and 6T SRAM Cells

    Uploaded by

    Kumarak Kannan T
    This document compares the power consumption of 4T and 6T SRAM cells. It describes the basic structure and operation of each, with 4T SRAM using 4 transistors and 6T SRAM using 6 transistors. Simulation results showed that the average power consumed by the 6T SRAM cell was 0.87 mW compared to 0.023 mW for the 4T cell, representing a 29% power savings for the 4T design. The document concludes that a comparative power analysis of the 4T and 6T SRAM designs allows for optimized area and control over speed.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 14

    Comparative static leakage power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    Project work done by S.Radha Guided by Asst. Prof Vijay Kiran


    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM 1

    Types of SRAM
    Two types of SRAM is designed using cadence analog design 180 nm technology 4t SRAM uses 4 transistors 6T SRAMuses 6transistors

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    6t SRAM

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    6t SRAM

    Consists of two cross coupled inverters with two pass transistors connected to complementry bit lines The access transistors are connected to wl to perform read and write operation

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    OPERATION OF 6t SRAM cell

    For write operation apply desired value to the bit control lines. Assert the word line.written bit is latched in the flipflop For reading assert both b and b/ bit lines to one and set word line to one

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    4t SRAM

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    Operation of 4t SRAM cell

    For write operation, the write drive discharges one of the bitline pair, Cell data is flipped During read operation ,the cell discharges A sense amplifier amplifies the differential voltage.

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    4t SRAM
    It consists of two access pmos and two drive nmos.no load element.
    Pre charged bitline voltage must be maintained at powerlevel

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    FORMULAE USED

    Supply voltage =1.8v Pav-4T-Vin = [(1/T) 0 T I dt] Vin Power consumed =input power-output comparitive power analysis of 4t power and 6t SRAM

    Comparison of power consumption


    Average power consumed by 6t transistor is 0.87 mW Average power consumed by 4t transistor is 0.023 mW Power is saved by 29%

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    10

    Symbol diagram of 6t SRAM

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    11

    Schematic of 6t SRAM

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    12

    Simulation Result

    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM

    13

    Conclusion & future applications

    A comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM with optimized area which allows precise control over speed. The design can be mapped and optimized on cadence tools For faster clock speed RAM , logic should be mapped with next generation micro electronics like micro fluid chips
    comparitive power analysis of 4t and 6t SRAM 14

    You might also like