Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Distributed Control Systems (DCS)
Distributed Control Systems (DCS)
THE WORKSHOP
This workshop will cover the practical applications of the modern distributed control system (DCS). Whilst all control systems are distributed to a certain extent today and there is a definite merging of the concepts of DCS, Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and SCADA and despite the rapid growth in the use of PLCs and SCADA systems, some of the advantages of a DCS can still be said to be: Integrity: The expected process down-time caused by a conventional DCS is significantly less than with using a SCADA/PLC. One incident in a refinery can cost more than the difference in price between a DCS and SCADA/PLC. Reasons for this would include redundancy, fault tolerance, diagnostic alarming on I/O errors, system design, and others. Engineering time: A small SCADA/PLC system is easy to design and configure. As the system grows bigger, the effort involved to properly design and configure the system grows exponentially, and also the risks that things can go wrong. To design and implement a single loop PID controller in a SCADA/PLC system is easy and quick. To design and implement the base layer control on a refinery using a SCADA/PLC system can be an absolute nightmare. Abnormal Situation Management and Intelligent Alarm Management is a very important DCS issue that provides significant advantages over PLC and SCADA systems. Few DCSs do justice to the process; in terms of controlling for superior performance - most of them merely do the basics and leave the rest to the operators. Operators tend to operate within their comfort zone; they don't drive the process "like Schumacher drives his Ferrari". If more than one adverse condition developed at the same time and the system is too basic to act protectively, the operator would probably not be able to react adequately and risk a major deviation. Not only is the process control functionality normally underdeveloped but online process and control system performance evaluation is rarely seen and alarm management is often badly done. Operators consequently have little feedback on their own performance and exceptional adverse conditions are often not handled as well as they should be. This workshop gives suggestions on dealing with these issues. Why are DCSs generally so under utilised? Often because the vendor minimises the applications software development costs to be sure of winning the job, or because he does not know enough about the process or if it is a green-field situation, enough could not be known at commissioning time but no allowance was made to add the missing functionality during the ramp-up phase. Often the client does not have the technical skills in-house to realise the desired functionality is missing or to adequately specify the desired functionality. This workshop examines all these issues and gives suggestions in dealing with them and whilst by no means exhaustive, provides an excellent starting point for you in working with DCSs.
THE PROGRAM
DAY ONE
INTRODUCTION SUMMARY OF TYPICAL DISTRIBUTED CONTROL SYSTEMS DCS VERSUS SCADA VERSUS PLCS
Comparison The Smart Instrument As A The Key Component In A DCS System
DAY TWO
ALARM SYSTEM MANAGEMENT FOR DCSS
Philosophies of Alarm Management Human and Ergonomic Factors Structure of good Alarm System Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Design of Alarm System Measurement of Performance
THREE TYPICAL APPLICATIONS COMPARISON OF OFFERINGS FROM DCS VENDORS SUMMARY AND CLOSURE
PRACTICAL SESSIONS
Simulation Software - Simulation of a typical DCS will be used. Specification of a DCS Configuration of a typical DCS Control Loop using a typical plant problem
idc@idc-online.com
w w w. i d c - o n l i n e . c o m