K

BULLETIN OF THE SERBIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY

2007.
LXXXVII - . 2
YEAR 2007
TOME LXXXVII - N 2
UDC 911.37 (497.11 )

- -
: 52
, -, - - ,
: ( ,
), ( ), ( )
( ). 1879.
,
, , -, , . 60- XX (
).
: , , , ,
Abstract: Lunica is situated in southeaster Serbia and is consists of 52 settlem. In this paper are emphasized
four main stages in evolution of Lunica: initial (from the old ages until the period of Turkish rule), early stage
(period of Turkish rule), central stage (from the liberation to the end of The Second World war), and modern stage
that lasts for more than 50 years. The specific demographic development from the year of 1879. until modern days is
denoted with changes in natural increase and migration. That is caused by the influences of the environmental
factors, and also social-historic, economic, socio-psychological and other factors. Since the 60-s this territory is the
good example of the area with high altitude and negative appearances in demographic development (depopulation
and intensive emigration)
Key words: settlements, population, Luznica, demographic changes, transformations

,

. (1810 m), (1706 m)
(1239 m), (960 m) (976 m).
(39 km), () .
4253' 438' ... 2214' 2238' ... 365 m
( ), 10001200 m ( ).
350 m o 800 m, 44 (23
350600 m 21 600800 m).

, - ( ).
, ,
*

, , , 3/3
, , , 3/3
146010,
.

116

26 km , 23 km , 48 km
30 km - .
, ,
,
.
( ) ,
(. .)
( ) , , ,
, , , .

(
,
, , , .) , ,
.
,
. (, , , ,
, ) ( )
( 13 km - )
(65,6%) . ,
()
.
, ,
. , 38
, , , , , ,
, , , , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , ,
, , , , , , ,
. , , ,
, , ,
, , , , , .
-
53.213 ha. 25.583 ha (48,1%),
33.685 ha (63,3%), 50.642 ha (95,2%).
, 20.010 ha
(37,6%), 16.799 ha (31,6%), 7.310 ha (13,7%)
( ).

, - ,
: , ,
.
,
, .
, , ,
, .
,
, .
,

. ()
. ( '''')

117

, ,
(, ., 1986),
, (, .,
1884), . ('''')
, XX .
, Campus belle,
(, ., 1967). ,
( ), ( ),
, , . ''
'' , , , ,
'' '' ,
,
( ) , .
(, ., 2001).
.
, XII
. .
( ), .

'' '' (, ., 1967).

XIV XIX . XV
XV , ,
, 1576/77. , , , ,
( ), , , , , ,
, , , 1606. (, ., 1979).
XIX ,
. ,
,
, .
.
XVIII XIX
,
, - ,
( 1890) ().
(
), .
( ) (
). ,
, (XVII XVIII ) (
XIX ),
.
, (, , ,
.), 1834/35. (. , ) .

. -
1877/78.
, , ,
, , ,
(1879) 30% .

118

. ,
,
, , , , , ,
, , , ,
( , 1882),
.
, , , 1892/93.
.
1918, .

.

. 1878. 1921. ( )
, 1948. 2 .
1878. 88,5% ( 500 ),
1948. 71,2% (5002.000 ).

, .
, ,
, .
(, , .)
, . ,

,
, , .
,
, , , - .
310 , 16
(49 ), , , .
XIX , ,
, , . ,
30- XX 420 .
, XX
,
. 1926,
'''' ,
( '''') .
, , ( 75 KW). 1934.
. 1939.
19 - .
, -
, , 1890 , 1923.
( ), 1927. . ( 20
) ,
. ,
. . 1860, 1878. 1910.
18 , 1941. 24 .
1922. . 12 14 ,
'''',

119

. 1938. , ,
, , , , (,
., 1967).


, .
,

, . ,
, 1986, (609 ha)
.
(2 )
. 60-
,
. 80- (1981.
1.064 ) , . , ,
(2002. 888 ) .
, ,
.
, ,

-
.

.

,
, , , .
,
1961. 83%, 2002.
13%. 60- , ,
50-
. ,
. , (
, , ,
, ), - (
, 20 ; 80-
21 ) .
, '''' (
), ''Lisca'' '''' ( ), '''' (
), ''D Company'' ( ) .
-
. ,
(1878) 50- XX ,
.
XX ,
, .

120

.
, ,
1879. . XIX
1000 ,
100 . XX
, , 1000
(1208), (1114). 200
: (122), (123),
(192), (112), (174) (186).
1900. 300 700 .

XX ,
.
, , ,
,
.
1. 1879-2002.

1879.
1900.
1961.
I
38
13.581
15.420
23.228
II
7
3.155
3.668
5.814
III
7
1.936
4.361
112

52
18.672
33.403
19.200
: ,
, . XI, - ,
, 1882.; 1900. , .
XXIII, , 1903; 19482002, , , . 9,
, 2004.

2002.
12.126
1.664
1.894
15.684

50- XX

. 26 1948. 1953. ,
. ,
, .
1961. 33.403 , 40 ,
2002, 15.684 , 1879. .
1961.
(1367), 200
. ,
,
. 1948. 2002.
8 ( 762), 603 4.596 .
1961. 1981. ( 70%

121

),
. , .
,
9%, 20 , .
,
. , 1953. 1991.
732 483 , 2002. 886
( 183). ,
, .
, ,
.
2002. 13
100 , 50 50
(1948. 468 ), 18 (1948. 591 ),
28 (1948. 218), 31 (1948. 332), 32 (1948. 403).
4.000 (), 5001.000 (),
500 . 60
, 591 18 ( 3,0),
, 867 85 ( 9,8), , 332 31 (
9,3) 403 32 ( 7,9).

, 365 m ( ) 1200m ( ),
:
600 m 23 (44,2%);
600 800 m 21 (40,3%);
800 m 8 (15,5%).

. , XIX
,
,
, . 20-
,
. 60- XX
,
600 m (1961. 51%, 2002. 72%)
,
.
600 800 m 37% 1961. 22%
2002. , 800 m 1961. 11%
, 2002. 6%.
2.

( m)
600
600800
800

1879.
1900.
8.593
10.493
7.983
7.878
2.096
829

1961.
17.056
12.620
3.727

2002.
11.361
3.341
982

: 1

, , , .

, , , .

122

, 70-
XX , .
1921. 3.755.
30- , 1948. 6.068
. 1971,
7.363. 1981.
(7.291),
6.011, .
, , . ,
610 ,
30 . 3 (
, , , , )
.
, (, ., 1981, ,
2004).

XX
XXI . XX
40 50,
20 30, 20.
30- ,
, 30, ,
.
, , 20 30.

, 60- XX , 1116.
,
7,5 60-,
(, ., 1981). 2005.
7,2, XX 23,6.
-16,4,
(-26,4), (-24,1), (-17,6), (-16,8), (-16,7)
(-16,4) .
(-34,8) (-19),
-17,9,
-17,4.
.

, ,
.
( , , , , ,
, , , .), ,
, , ( , , .)
( , .), ( ,
, ).
, , , .

.
XX , ,
, ,

123

,
. ,
. 50-
XX ,
: ,
, ,
.
( 60- ) ,
, ,
.
- .
, ,
, XX
(, ., 1981).

, .
2002. (4575 ) 29,4% (1348 ), 70,6%
(3227 ) .
, 85% , 353
10% .
2002. 2% .
60- 80-
, ,
1981/90. 31,5% ,
1971/80. 1991/2002.
23%
. , 100%
, . ,
.

. 2002. 13%
15 , 60 30,5%.
.
70 , 50
11 , , , , ,
, , , , ,
38 .

60-
XX ,
. .
2002.
11.547, 2.806 24,3%,
. 9
16.000 ,
, 1,5 .
, , 2000.
, 400.000

,
, 1991-2002.
.

124

.
, ,
.
,
, ,
, ,
.
100 ,
,
(, 2007.).

, . (1884). .
, . (1979). , , . 8-9, . 121-175.
, . (1967). . : ''''
, .(1981). .
, . 11, . 57-99.
, . (1986). , : , '''', 2
, . (2001). . ., . :
, '''', '' '', ( I, . 63-76)
*** (1882). , (. XI). :
-
*** (1900). 1900. (. XXIII). .
*** (2003) 1948-2002. ,
2002. (. 9). :
*** (2007) , , , :

*** (2007) 2006. :
*** ,
, ,

MARIJA MARTINOVI
DANICA ANTI
Summary
THE LUNICA SETTLEMENTS
Geographic-Historical And Spatial-Demographic TransformationThe development of Lunica settlements went through many geographic, historic and spatial-demographic
changes. Geographical, historical and antopogeographical conditions were in favour to settlement development in
antic times and middle ages, when the Lunica were first mentioned in written sources. After the liberation from
the turkish rule settlements transformed considerably-demographicly (population increace etc.), fizionomicly
(growing of the settlements in area), changes of property of the land etc) and funcional (decreasing of traditional,
agrarian function, apperiance of the new function etc.). Today, with acctual demographic changes (redaction in
rural population, increasing the urban population etc.) special equilibrium in the development of Babunica, on the
one side, and the rest of the Lunica settlements on the other side, has been interrupted. Positive overall
development of Babunica is primarily caused by good traffic connections, industrial development etc. The
settlements, which are located in the mountains, are in the conditions of inadequate state treatment are in the stage
of stagnation and demographic disapirence.