Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(..) 2/2554
4 2554
3/2554 29
2554
AERMOD CALPUFF
2/2556
18 2556
6/2556 29 2556
24 2556 (.)
.
24 2557
24 2556
1.
1.1
1.2
1.3 EIA
6
2.
3. EIA
15
4.
EIA
15
4.1 AERMOD
4.2 CALPUFF
15
16
17
18
1. (Model Selection)
18
18
18
3. (Source Information)
20
4. (Meteorological Information)
5. (Receptor) (Receptor and Terrain Elevation Information)
22
24
6. (Background Concentration)
25
7. (Total Impact)
25
8.
9.
26
26
10.
26
27
(..) 2/2554 4
2554
AERMOD
3/2554 29 2554
1.
1.1
(1)
(Environmental Impact Assessment EIA)
(2)
(3) /
(4)
(5)
1.2
(1) (Model Predicted
Concentration)
1.3
EIA
(1) .. 2539-2540 (NO2)
Industrial Source Complex Short-Term (ISCST) EIA
(
(.)
60
6
EIA
.. 2541
NO2
512
/ 60
( NO2 320 /)
(2) .. 2540-2541
()
(.)
ISCST CALPUFF
() . .
3 (NO2) (SO2)
(Total Suspended Particulate TSP)
. (.) (.)
(3) 1/2550 () 11
2550
CALPUFF
(Scatter Plot)
3
NO2 SO2 TSP
(4) .. 2551
( AERMOD)
EIA ( )
7
(EIA)
AERMOD U.S. EPA Preferred Model
50 (Near-field Applications)
9 .. 2549 .
EIA .. 2550
.
(5) 6/2550 9
2550
80/20
.
.
(6) 2/2554 4
2554 .
CALPUFF AERMOD .
CALPUFF 1
(Maximum Ground Level Concentration Max. GLC) NO2 SO2
8 4
AERMOD
EIA
(7) 1/2554
27 2554
8
2.
(Overly Conservative)
(1) Applicability of Appendix W Modeling Guidance for the 1-hr NO2 National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (28 2553)
(2) General Guidance for Implementing the 1-hr NO2 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard in Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permits, Including an Interim 1-hr
NO2 Significant Impact Level (28 2553)
(3) General Guidance for Implementing the 1-hr SO2 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard in Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permits, Including an Interim 1-hr
SO2 Significant Impact Level (23 2553)
(4) Additional Clarification Regarding Application of Appendix W Modeling
Guidance for the 1-hr NO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (1 2554)
2.5
(1) Colorado Modeling Guideline for Air Quality Permits (2548), Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment
(2) Air Quality Modeling Procedures (2549), Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality
(3) Air Dispersion Modeling Guideline for Ontario (2552), Ontario Regulation
419/05: Air Pollution-Local Air Quality (the Regulation)
(4) Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines for Oklahoma Air Quality Permits (2554),
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(5) Modeling Compliance of the 1-hr NO2 NAAQS (2554), California Air Pollution
Control Officers Association
(6) Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines for Non-PSD, Pre-Construction Permit
Applications (2556), Iowa Department of Natural Resources
10
11
2 NO2 1
3 NO2 1
12
4 SO2 1
5 SO2 24
13
6 SO2 1
2.6 AERMOD
2555 Journal of the
Air and Waste Management Association (JAWMA) 62 8 NO2 and SO2 Dispersion
Modeling and Relative Roles of Emission Sources over Map Ta Phut Industrial Area, Thailand
, , ,
PVMRM
NO2 (Overly Conservative)
2.7 3
( .. 2552-2554) 1,2 1,3
7
Best Available Control Technology
(High-Temperature Combustion)
Recuperative Thermal Oxidizer Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer
95-99 NOx
14
NOx
3.
EIA
(
(Surface Data) (Upper Air Data))
Cumulative Concentration
(Max. GLC)
Background Concentration
NO2/NOx Conversion 0.75 1
(Overly
Conservative)
4.
EIA
4.1 AERMOD
AERMOD steady-state plume dispersion U.S. EPA
Preferred regulatory model
50
(Near-field)
AERMOD
(Point, Area and Volume
Sources)
15
(Rural and Urban Areas)
(Complex Terrain)
4.2 CALPUFF
CALPUFF Non-steady-state Lagrangian Puff dispersion
U.S. EPA Preferred regulatory model
50-200
(Far-field) CALPUFF
Near-field U.S. EPA
complex wind
CALPUFF
AERMOD Preferred near-field regulatory model
CALPUFF
Alternative model Near-field
(1) Scientific peer
review
(2)
(3)
16
17
EIA
(Standardization of Air
Dispersion Modeling Application)
1. (Model Selection)
1.1 AERMOD U.S. EPA
( 50 )
1.2 CALPUFF U.S. EPA
( 50 )
-
(Complex Wind)
U.S. EPA
(Case-by-Case)
2. (Emission Rate Determination)
2.1
U.S. EPA NOx SO2
/
(Maximum Ground Level Concentration)
(Significant Impact Level SIL)
(1) SIL
80
18
(2) SIL
80
80/20
(Maximum Actual Emission) (Emission Offset)
(Emission Trading)
/
80
2.2
NOx SO2 80
80/20
(Maximum Actual Emission) (Emission Offset) (Emission
Trading) /
80
2.3
80 /
(1)
80/20 (Stack)
20 (Fugitive)
(2)
2.4
2.5
80
19
Background Concentration
10 20 30 40 50 60
2.6
(Best Available Control Technology,
BACT) / (Best Practices)
U.S. EPA
(Case-by-Case)
3. (Source Information)
3.1
(Downwash)
3.2 (Point Source)
() () ()
() () ()
( 25 1 / 7
) ( /
) ()
3.3 (Area Source) (Volume Source)
3.4
50 75
3.5
3.6
500
(x/8760 )
20
20
3.162 10 4 H
De =
()
H e = H s + 1.57 10 3 (H )0.478
() Hs ()
3.12 (Fugitive)
(Area Source) 1 273
0.001
3.13
(Building Downwash) Building Profile
Input Program with Plume Rise Enhancement (BPIP-Prime) U.S. EPA
21
(2.1) 1 4 90
1 4 0 2 1 3
4
(2.2) 1 4 90
1 4 0 (Step-wise
Linear Interpolation)
4.4 (Upper Air Met. Data) 1
(Onsite/Online) 3
3
4.5 1
(Linear Interpolation)
1
4.6 10
(Meteorological Tower)
10
4.7 Auer
(3) Albedo 10 x 10
24
6.
(Background
Concentration)
6.1 (Online Monitoring Station)
3 (Averaging Time)
75
6.2
(Averaging Time) 4
7 2 (Prevailing Winds)
- - 5-7
7. (Total Impact)
7.1
(1 25 )
5.6
7.2 /
(Total Impact) (Exceedance)
7.3
(Total Impact)
25
8.
(Online Monitoring Station)
1
9. (Input)
(AERMOD/AERMET/AERMAP
CALPUFF/CALMET/CALPOST) (Output)
10.
26
(Significant Impact Level (SIL))
(NO2)
(SO2)
(SIL)
:
1
12.8
31.2
24
4.11
1
0.57
1
SIL 1 4
SIL 24 1.37
SIL 1 1
_____________________________
27