You are on page 1of 16

3115 53 114

The Reality of New Updated Technology Application


in The Curriculum According to Total Quality
Management Indicators

/
Wafa Mahmood Jasim
Enas Faek Aziz
Assistant Professor
Assistant Lecturer
Community Health Dept.
Computer System Dept.
Foundation of Technical Institute- Kirkuk Technical Institute
jasimwafa@yahoo.com
enasalwandawi@yahoo.com

1221/21/21

1221/7/21

]312 [

...


.

. 1111 /5/1 1111/ 11/1 /

) %88-11

.%39


.

:
Abstract
The vocational institutions interest appeared in the total quality management through the
educational approach including technical aspect. The study aimed to visualize the students
perspectives for the main benefits of formative technology through special questionnaire
form conducted for the final stages of both KIRKUK Technical Institute and College from
the period of 1/12/ 2011 till 1/5/2012 .
Data collected and analyzed statistically and it was found that majority of students
preferred formative technology learning because of time consuming reasons (16- 88%) and
most of them agreed with application of this technology in teaching field for
communication improvement and strengthen the scientific qualification (93%).The research
concluded that informative technology have a good approach in teaching aspect to gain a
better future results and it recommended that establishment of strong scientific back ground
for good quality of life .
Key wards: Informative technology , Curriculum , Quality

[]312




-

( .)3 5002


7891
7885
7889
(. 7888
)2 5002




.
: :
-7
.
-5 .




* ( )2
( )3 ( )5 .

( )12
( 52 52 )
( 2 55 )
(.(Simple Randomization Techniqu

. . . -. .

...

[ ]312



:
-7
( )72 ( )pretest
(.)%12
-5 ( ) 12
(.)5075-5077

SPSS 71

.

-1 : 5077 /75/7 .5075/2 /7
-1 : ( )
( ).
-9 :

.

-1


"
"



( .)1 5007







( .)9 5003

[]312

-1





( .)3 5003














(.)6 5005
-9

( )



(.)2 5000







( .)9 5007
(
:)3 5000

...

-7
-5
-3
-2
-7
-5
-3
-2
-2

[ ]331

.
( )
.

.
.
( 727881:)1 7882

.
: .
: .
: .
.




( )
.

( ) ( )77


.
7

/



=
=

2
52
59

739
255
313

52
55
21

965
219
651

58
26
12

]
[ ] [

SPSS ( = 7= .)5

(.)60 5009

[]331

( )7
(.)%651 -21
5

)4-1

-7
.
-5


-3


-2

.

56

32.1

28

62.3

0.32

0.218

11

99

75

099

0.351

21

86

0.86

0.781

65

95.1

73

713

0.93

0.397

N=75

( )5
( )%99-66

( )%86-15 .

5070/

(.)8 5070
3

)8-5
-2



.
-6


.

21

83.3

6.1

0.38

0.527

20

66.1

52

33.3

0.61

0.212

[ ]333

...
)8-5
-1

.
-9

.

21

82.1

24

89.1

2.3

0.82

0.556

7.3

0.88

0.772

N=75
:

3

( )20-12 -2
9 (. )%833


.
5002 /


( .)2 5002





( .)72 5007




( .)6 5003
2



61

N%

%98.3

0.377

7.77

[]335

N%

%70.1

12

%89.1

%7.3

66
8

0.772

7.07

%99
%75

0.351

7.75

25

%26

0.200

7.22

33

%22

2
( )% 98.3 61
(.)%89.1-12



(.)1 5006

( )%26 -25 .


( .)9 5007
2

-7


-5



75
()%76

6
()%9

: .

7.85

1.129

6
()%9

68
()%85

12

21
()%16

12

5.6

0.123

...

[ ]334

( )%85-68

/ 5006 -

(
.)70 5006
2

:
-7
.
-5
.
-3
.
( )%9-6
:
-7
.
-5
.




(.)73 5070




.

[]333


( )%52-79

( .)% 3302-52
( )%57.03 -76 (-70
.)%733



( .)6 5008



.
/


( .)9 5001
1

N%

28

%62.3

56

%32.1

7.32

0.218

[ ]332

...

N%

63

%92

75

%76

7.76

0.368

21
59

%65.1
%31.3

7.31

0.291

77
62

%72.1
%92.3

7.92

0.326

26
58

%67.3
%39.1

7.38

0.280

1
( )%92-63 ( )%65.1 21
( )% 92.3-62
.
5002/


( .)2 5002


( .)1 5001


( .)3 5007


( 8 5000 .)6 5003
( )7880 Xue ( )5000 Klocnski

.

[]332

7



5



3




(ISO 9000-
)2000


5002

5002

5003

5005

5000

5007





8000











.



.

.

.

5000

7881



.

.

.





.

...

[ ]332

7882


.
.

70

77

2000

Klocnski

1990

Xue



:
-7

.
-5
.
-3



.
-2



.
-2

.
-6

.

[]332

-7
.
-5

.
-3
.
-2
.
-2

.
-1 .
-9 .
-8
.
-70
.

.7
.5
.3
.2
.2
.6
.1
.9
.8


/ /
.5001

.5000

.5003

( )57 ( )5
.5007

SPSS .5009

( )585 .)5003(

.5000

.5070
-
.5006

...

[ ]351

.70
. 5006
.77
)(ISO 9000-2000.5007
.75 . 5008
.73
.5070
.72
.5002
.72
.5002
.76
.5002

You might also like