The film 500 Days of Summer used split screen to contrast a character's expectations with reality by showing his anticipated positive reaction to giving a gift side-by-side with the actual muted response. This comedic effect illustrated the difference between fantasy and reality in a relatable way. In contrast, The Thomas Crown Affair used split screen to simultaneously depict both sides of a phone conversation as actual events, not imagined scenarios. There is no right answer for which technique is better, as it depends on the type of film and story being told, but 500 Days of Summer's approach could support an entire comedy, while The Thomas Crown Affair's presents a unique way to show dual perspectives of a real situation.
The film 500 Days of Summer used split screen to contrast a character's expectations with reality by showing his anticipated positive reaction to giving a gift side-by-side with the actual muted response. This comedic effect illustrated the difference between fantasy and reality in a relatable way. In contrast, The Thomas Crown Affair used split screen to simultaneously depict both sides of a phone conversation as actual events, not imagined scenarios. There is no right answer for which technique is better, as it depends on the type of film and story being told, but 500 Days of Summer's approach could support an entire comedy, while The Thomas Crown Affair's presents a unique way to show dual perspectives of a real situation.
The film 500 Days of Summer used split screen to contrast a character's expectations with reality by showing his anticipated positive reaction to giving a gift side-by-side with the actual muted response. This comedic effect illustrated the difference between fantasy and reality in a relatable way. In contrast, The Thomas Crown Affair used split screen to simultaneously depict both sides of a phone conversation as actual events, not imagined scenarios. There is no right answer for which technique is better, as it depends on the type of film and story being told, but 500 Days of Summer's approach could support an entire comedy, while The Thomas Crown Affair's presents a unique way to show dual perspectives of a real situation.
Describe how the film 500 days of summer used split
screen to tell a story from multiple perspectives. Split screen was used to show the expectation that was in the mans head to the reality that was shown in real life, it showed him giving a present to a girl in both sides of the screen and his expectations were that shed give him a hug, but in reality she just tapped him on the shoulder and said thank you; this had quite a comedic effect on the audience as it is a very relatable subject.
How is this different to the method used in The Thomas
Crown Affair? Which is better? The 500 Days Of Summer scene is very different to the method used in The Thomas Crown Affair as what is shown in 500 Days Of Summer is fiction vs non-fiction, whereas in The Thomas Crown Affair they are both scenes that actually happened, in the telephone scene split screen is used to show the two different ends of the phone conversation; they are just both played at the same time which makes the two stories seem similar. I think it depends on what type of film you are making to say which type is better as the Expectations vs Reality effect could make an entire film, it would also be very effective in a comedy. The technique used in The Thomas Crown Affair is a great way of showing two different sides of a story at the same time and is a great editing technique.