Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2- M-Governance Awards
3- Student Awards
4- IT Champion Awards
BETTER
INNOVATIVE
FASTER
(2) M-Governance Awards: To reward and support specific impact through the use of m-applications for
services delivery, program management, and performance management;
Type 1: Practice
(3) Student Awards: To encourage innovative and socially-geared thinking and action among students in
the field of technology and m-applications;
Type 1: Young ICT Innovate
Type 2: Technologists
(4) IT Champion Awards: To recognize the contributions of individuals and Organizations those have
played a role in promoting ICT innovations in Afghanistan.
Type 1: IT Champions
Template
from
DEWAE
Website
(www.dewae.mcit.gov.af)
or
30 days
30 days
30 days
2- M-Governance Awards
Type 1 Practice:
30 days
3- Student Awards
Type 1 Young ICT Innovator:30 days
Type 2 Technologists:
30 days
4- IT Champion Awards
Type 1 IT Champion:
30 days
Challenge postings can be extended from 30 days beyond subject to situation and importance of
challenges and number of responses.
During the posting period Solvers may have questions for the Seeker about the Challenge. If the DEWAE
Implementing Organization (AIMS) cannot answer the question, they will be forwarded to the Challenge
Owner. The IPM will then convey the answers back to the Solvers, after one week of the posting of
challenges, AIMS will arrange E-mail, face to face meeting, Mobile calls session for question and answers
as well.
15-45 days
15-45 days
15-45 days
2- M-Governance Awards
Type 1 Practice:
15-45 days
3- Student Awards
Type 1 Young ICT Innovator:
Type 2 Technologists:
15-45 days
15-45 days
4- IT Champion Awards
Type 1 IT Champion:
15-45 days
Challenge evaluation periods can be extended for additional 30 days due to high volume of proposals
submissions.
Evaluation and Prioritization of Challenges
Challenges should be proposed by the agencies and others and submitted to AIMS for evaluation by the
Expert Group. For this purpose, the Expert Group will establish a Challenge Evaluation Committee (CEC).
The CEC will examine challenge proposals that have been submitted to AIMS every six months and
decide on the ones that score the basic minimum marks using the Challenge Evaluation Matrix given
below. The evaluation factors for awards are also given in the tables below. The weight to be assigned to
the three categories of awards would be however different as shown in Tables below.
Table: Evaluation & Prioritization Matrix: M-Governance Award Challenges
S. No Factor
Factor
Weight
Weighted
Remarks
Score
Factor Score
1.
Degree
of
M-tech
10
Whether or not mobile technology
Applicability
ICT is applicable?
Ramification
problem.
of
10
Scope
10
10
Economic Benefits to
Government
Social Benefits
20
10
30
100
Weighted factor score is equal to factor score multiplied by the factor weight
The Challenges for M-Governance awards that score less than 500 total weighted score will be
eliminated.
Table: Evaluation & Prioritization Matrix: M-Technology & Young ICT Innovator Award Challenges
S. No
Factor
Factor
Score
Weight
Weighted
Factor Score
Remarks
1.
Degree of M-tech
Applicability
20
Ramification of the
problem
10
10
Economic Benefits
to Challenger or
potential investors
Social Benefits
10
20
Multiplier
linkages
and
10
10
TOTAL
100
Factor Score Range 1-10 (1 being the Minimum and 10 the Maximum)
Weighted factor score is equal to factor score multiplied by the factor weight
All Challenges with total weighted score of less than 500 would be discarded and eliminated.
No individual, firm or organization that has been involved in the establishment of a challenge
will be eligible to participate in the competition for an award for that challenge.
Officers of the AIMS or their close family members (i.e., spouse, sons, daughters, father and
mother) will not participate in any award competition of the ISP.
Members of the Expert Group, SEB, and Panel of Judges and none of their close family members
will participate in any competition for any award of the ISP.
Only one solution will be submitted by an individual or an organization for one challenge
competition. However, an individual or a firm or an organization may respond to more than one
challenge at the same time.
The participants will respond to the challenges in the format and in the manner specified in the
official invitation to respond as posted on the website of the ISP or in the advertisements that
ISP will issue for each category of awards.
As will be stated in the invitation for the Ideation challenges, participants may be required to
give up their intellectual property (IP) rights on the content including software applications and
any other intellectual product that they may submit as a part of the response to any Ideation
challenge. It is expected that winners of the other awards will recognize the support of the ISP
and Government of Afghanistan.
Participants will not submit any content that is offensive, has been plagiarized and has on it IP
rights of a third party. The submissions that include content of forgoing nature will be rejected
and not included in the competition.
The participants whose submissions have been rejected for any reason will be intimated the
reason for rejection within one week of receipt of their submissions and will be given a weeks
time to resubmit their responses if they so wish.
The names of all participants whose entries for each category of awards have been accepted will
be displayed on the ISP website.
The participants can send their responses electronically via the website of the ISP or by email as
attachment, personally or via mail service. The manner in which the responses can be submitted
will be explained in details in the ISP website and in the advertisements that will be issued by ISP
for each award category.
The participants whose submissions have been accepted for any category of awards can
withdraw their submission until the date of withdrawal mentioned against each award
competition.
All intending participants would be required to register at the ISP website their name and other
personal and professional details, and choose a user name and a password to complete their
registration. Registration of organizations, companies and NGOs can be done by the manager of
the organization concerned.
Announcement of challenge
Receipt of responses
Preliminary evaluation by AIMS staff to ensure compliance with challenge requirements
Short-listing of submissions by AIMS assisted by Expert Group, if AIMS determines it is needed,
especially if there is a large number of submissions
Selection of the panel of judges
Review of submissions by panel of judges
Section of winner(s) for each category by the panel of judges
Approval of selection by SEB and Dy. Minister Technical of Ministry of Communication & IT(as
Chairman of PICU for ICTDP of MCIT)
Announcement of the winner
Process Flow for selection of winners for m-government and m-application awards is given
below:
Responses
from
participants
Meets
Acceptanc
e Criteria
Yes
No
Response
archived
Yes
Shortlisted
Responses
Minimu
m
Scores
Obtaine
Shortlisted
Responses
Evaluated by
PANEL of
JUDGES
WINNERS SELECTED
Factor Description
10
30
10
2
5
7
8
Score
( 1-10)
Weight
Weighted*
Factor
Score
10
15
10
10
15
100
Factor Description
10
10
10
20
Score
( 1-10)
Weight
Weighted*
Factor Score
10
10
TOTAL
100
10
20
Solution Transfer
For Idea, Solution and Practice, DEWAE notifies winning and non-winning solver. For Winning Solver,
DEWAE Operations completes Solver verification process, pays the award to the winning Solvers,
completes and transfers documentation to the Seeker for each solution awarded. If IP Rights are
involved, ownership is transferred to the Seeker.
The Solver verification process and solution transfer is dependent on the timely response from the
Solvers. The process typically takes 2-4 weeks from when the winners are selected before solutions are
transferred to the Seeker.
challenge
which
faced
your