Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 Objective: A A B B
1.0 Objective: A A B B
OBJECTIVE
The objective is to verify member forces obtain from experiment with tension
coefficient method.
2.0
LEARNING OUTCOME
There are many learning outcome that we can get from this laboratory test:
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
To identify the problem, solving and finding out the appropriate solution
through laboratory application.
3.0
THEORY
If a members of a truss system is situated not in a two dimensional plane, then the
truss is defined as a space frame truss. In other words, space truss has components
in three axis i.e. x, y and z.
Consider a member with node A (xA, yA) and B (xB,yB)
Assume te force in the member is TAB (+ve tension) and length LAB
Definition of tension coefficient (t), tAB
TAB
LAB
At A, the horizontal component TAB is :
TAB cos
LAB
=
Using statics, write the equation for each joint using the coordinate value and
solve for it. Convert it into force using:
TAB
tAB LAB
prices. Space frame systems give you the architectural beauty you desire within
the budget you set.
Some space frame applications include:
1)
Parking canopysH
2)
3)
2)
Column-free spaces
3)
4)
5)
Redundant integrity
6)
Design freedom
7)
8)
4.0
APPARATUS
PROSEDURES
4
Part 1
1.
2.
Then, ensure that the distance a = 500 mm and place load hanger on D.
3.
4.
5.
After that, we put the selected load on hanger at D and record it.
6.
7.
Finally, calculate the theoretical member forces and record it in table one.
Part 2
1.
2.
3.
After that, measure the distance b, c, and d. Then we record the dynamometer
reading for member S1, S2, S3 in table 2.
4.
The next step is we put a load of 5 N on the hanger and record the
dynamometer readings.
5.
6.
7.
The last one is we plot the graf of force against load for the theoretical and
experimental results.
5.0
RESULT
Table 1
Dimension (mm)
Dynamometer Reading
500
483
260
400
503
300
200
S1
Force (N)
S2
S3
Experiment
Theory
Loaded
Unloaded
Loaded
Unloaded
Loaded
Unloaded
S1
S2
S3
S1
S2
S3
365
60
40
55
80
20
55
80
142.35
142.35
-274.27
215
365
78
70
74
40
110
34
110
141.54
141.54
-273.51
532
170
365
109
15
104
11
150
10
94
93
140
72.16
72.16
-139.63
548
110
365
181
31
175
28
240
40
150
147
200
146.14
146.14
-279.47
Table 2
Load
(N)
5
10
15
20
25
Dynamometer Reading
S1
Loaded
Unloaded
50
10
90
10
134
10
178
10
230
10
Dimension a = 350mm
S2
Loaded
45
85
130
175
225
Unloaded
7
7
7
7
7
S3
Loaded
70
120
180
245
305
Dimension b = 521mm
Unloaded
20
20
20
20
20
Force (N)
Experiment
S1
S2
40
38
80
78
124
123
168
168
220
218
Dimension c = 185mm
S3
50
100
160
225
285
Theory
S1
53.48
106.96
160.43
213.91
267.39
Dimension d = 365mm
S2
53.48
106.96
160.43
213.91
267.39
S3
-98.97
-197.95
-296.92
-395.89
-494.86
Data Analysis
Part 1:
Example Of Experiment Calculation
a = 500 mm
1. S1 :
So
2. S2 :
So
3. S3 :
So
loaded
Unloaded
= 60N
= 40N
S1
= 60N 40N
= 20N
loaded
Unloaded
= 55N
= 0N
S2
= 55N 0N
= 55N
loaded
Unloaded
= 80N
= 0N
S3
= 80N 0N
= 80 N
Part 1:
Table 1 theoretical calculation
Load F = 10 N
1. a = 500mm, b = 483mm, c = 260mm, d = 365mm.
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for S1 and S2)
Lz = a c (for S1 and S2)
F=Lxt
L = (Lx + Ly + Lz)
Member
Lx (mm) Ly (mm)
S1
483
-182.5
S2
483
182.5
S3
483
0.00
Force (N)
0
0
Fx = 0;
Lz (mm)
240
240
260
-10
L (mm)
569.38
569.38
548.53
-
t
0.25
0.25
-0.50
-
F (N)
142.35
142.35
-274.27
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
Fx = 0;
Lz (mm)
185
185
215
-10
L (mm)
566.16
566.16
547.02
-
ts1 = 0.25
ts2 = 0.25
ts3 = -0.50
And S1 = 141.54
S2 = 141.54
S3 = -273.51
t
0.25
0.25
-0.50
-
F (N)
141.54
141.54
-273.51
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for S1 and S2)
Lz = a c (for S1 and S2)
F=Lxt
L = (Lx + Ly + Lz)
Member
Lx (mm) Ly (mm) Lz (mm)
S1
532
-182.5
130
S2
532
182.5
130
S3
532
0.00
170
Force (N) 0
0
-10
Fx = 0;
L (mm)
577.26
577.26
558.50
-
= -10
By using calculator
So ts1 = 0.125
ts2 = 0.125
ts3 = -0.25
And
S1 = 72.16
S2 = 72.16
S3 = -139.63
t
0.125
0.125
-0.25
-
F (N)
72.16
72.16
-139.63
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
Fx = 0;
Lz (mm)
90
90
110
-10
By using calculator
So ts1 = 0.25
ts2 = 0.25
ts3 = -0.50
And S1 = 146.14
S2 = 146.14
S3 = -279.47
Part 2 :
Table 2 theoretical calculation:
= -10
L (mm)
584.56
584.56
558.93
-
t
0.25
0.25
-0.50
-
F (N)
146.14
146.14
-279.47
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
1. Load F = 5 N
a = 350mm, b = 521mm, c = 185mm, d = 365mm.
Member
S1
S2
S3
Force (N)
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for S1 and S2)
Lz = a c (for S1 and S2)
F=Lxt
L = (Lx + Ly + Lz)
Lx (mm) Ly (mm) Lz (mm)
350
-182.5
165
350
182.5
165
350
0.00
185
0
0
-5
Fx = 0;
FY = 0;
Fz = 0;
By using calculator
So
ts1 = 0.125
ts2 = 0.125
ts3 = -0.25
And S1 = 53.48
S2 = 53.48
S3 = -98.97
=0
= -5
L (mm)
427.82
427.82
395.89
-
t
0.125
0.125
-0.25
-
F (N)
53.48
53.48
-98.97
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
2. Load F = 10 N
a = 350mm, b = 521mm, c = 185mm, d = 365mm.
Member
S1
S2
S3
Force (N)
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for S1 and S2)
Lz = a c (for S1 and S2)
F=Lxt
L = (Lx + Ly + Lz)
Lx (mm) Ly (mm) Lz (mm)
350
-182.5
165
350
182.5
165
350
0.00
185
0
0
-10
Fx = 0;
FY = 0;
Fz = 0;
By using calculator
So
ts1 = 0.25
ts2 = 0.25
ts3 = -0.50
And S1 = 106.96
S2 = 106.96
S3 = -197.95
L (mm)
427.82
427.82
395.89
-
=0
= -10
t
0.25
0.25
-0.50
-
F (N)
106.96
106.96
-197.95
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
3. Load F = 15 N
a = 350mm, b = 521mm, c = 185mm, d = 365mm.
Member
S1
S2
S3
Force (N)
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for S1 and S2)
Lz = a c (for S1 and S2)
F=Lxt
L = (Lx + Ly + Lz)
Lx (mm) Ly (mm) Lz (mm)
350
-182.5
165
350
182.5
165
350
0.00
185
0
0
-15
Fx = 0;
FY = 0;
Fz = 0;
By using calculator
So
ts1 = 0.375
ts2 = 0.375
ts3 = -0.75
And S1 = 160.43
S2 = 160.43
S3 = -296.92
L (mm)
427.82
427.82
395.89
-
=0
= -15
t
0.375
0.375
-0.75
-
F (N)
160.43
160.43
-296.92
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
4. Load F = 20 N
a = 350mm, b = 521mm, c = 185mm, d = 365mm.
Member
S1
S2
S3
Force (N)
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for S1 and S2)
Lz = a c (for S1 and S2)
F=Lxt
L = (Lx + Ly + Lz)
Lx (mm) Ly (mm) Lz (mm)
350
-182.5
165
350
182.5
165
350
0.00
185
0
0
-20
Fx = 0;
FY = 0;
Fz = 0;
By using calculator
So
ts1 = 0.5
ts2 = 0.5
ts3 = -1
And S1 = 213.91
S2 = 213.91
S3 = -395.89
L (mm)
427.82
427.82
395.89
-
=0
= -20
t
0.5
0.5
-1
-
F (N)
213.91
213.91
-395.89
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
5. Load F = 25 N
a = 350mm, b = 521mm, c = 185mm, d = 365mm.
Member
S1
S2
S3
Force (N)
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for S1 and S2)
Lz = a c (for S1 and S2)
F=Lxt
L = (Lx + Ly + Lz)
Lx (mm) Ly (mm) Lz (mm)
350
-182.5
165
350
182.5
165
350
0.00
185
0
0
-25
Fx = 0;
FY = 0;
Fz = 0;
By using calculator
So
ts1 = 0.625
ts2 = 0.625
ts3 = -1.25
And S1 = 267.39
S2 = 267.39
S3 = -494.86
GRAPH
L (mm)
427.82
427.82
395.89
-
=0
= -25
t
0.625
0.625
-1.25
-
F (N)
267.39
267.39
-494.86
-
Remarks
Tension
Tension
Compression
-
6.0
DISSCUSSION
Based on the graph that have been plotted, we can see that for the graph1, the
comparison between the theoretical and the experimental results is there is not much
different for the two lines. When more load were applied, the value of force was also
increase.
It is same like the graph2, which is there is a little difference between the
theoretical and the experimental results. The value of force in increase due to the
increasing of load.
But for the graph3, the results of the theoretical and the experimental is totally
difference because for the experiment, the results is in range 0 to 300 while for the results
of the theoretical is around range -0 to -300. For the theoretical, when more load were
applied, the value of force were decrease but for the experimental, when more load were
applied, the force will increase.
The reason of discrepancy in the results maybe cause by the spring that used was
not elastic anymore after being stretched for many time of doing experiment, it might
have a mistake during taking the results. Beside that, it maybe cause by the error of the
apparatus which is not in good condition.
7.0
CONCLUSION
The experiment is to prove experimental and theoretical have a small relative
value. Space frames usually utilize a multidirectional span, and are often used to
accomplish long spans with few supports. They derive their strength from the inherent
rigidity of the triangular frame; flexing loads (bending moments) are transmitted as
tension and compression loads along the length of each structure.
In many ways this looks like the horizontal jib of a tower crane repeated many
times to make it wider. A stronger purer form is composed of interlocking tetrahedral
pyramids in which all the struts have unit length. More technically this is referred to as an
isotropic vector matrix or in a single unit width an octet truss.