You are on page 1of 70

Magnetic Buck Converters for Portable Applications

Frank De Stasi Mathew Jacob

Outline
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Why use Switching Regulators? Common Device/Converter Specifications Buck Converter Analysis CCM/DCM modes Selection of L and C Synchronous Buck Converters Conduction and Switching Losses Efficiency improvement using PWM/PFM/LDO modes Control Approaches Current Mode Models and Compensation Guidelines Transient Measurement Techniques Layout Guidelines
2
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Efficiency
Ig Io

Power supply
Vg +

+ Vo _

P/DSP core

output DC power Po Vo I o = = = input DC power Pg Vg I g

3
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Linear voltage regulator as power supply


Series pass transistor
Q Iload + Vg + C Vo

Load

Vref

Bandgap reference

Simple, low noise, small footprint area Output voltage lower than the battery voltage High efficiency only if Vo is close to Vg
4
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Linear regulator power model


Ig Rs Io + Vg + IQ Vo

Bias current

I g = Io + IQ
Efficiency:

Vo ?< Linear regulator efficiency cannot be greater Vg than the ratio of the output and the input voltage
5
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Vo I o Vo I o ?= = Vg I g Vg ( I o + I Q )

SMPS efficiency as a function of load


100 90 80 70 Efficiency [%] 60 50 40 . 30 20 10 0 0.1 1 10 Io [mA] 100 1000

Buck regulator

Example: Vg = 3.6 V Vo = 1.5 V 0 < Io < 300 mA

Linear regulator

6
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Buck (step-down) switching power converter


Ig
1

Low-pass LC filter
+
2

L + C

Io

Vg

vs (t)

v(t)

Load

vs(t)

Vg DTs 0 DTs 1 2 D' Ts 0 Ts

fs = 1/Ts = switching frequency


t
1

Switch position:

D = switch duty cycle


7
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Buck converter ideal static characteristic


vs(t)
Vg area = DTsVg

vs = DVg
0 DTs

V Vg

t Conversion ratio:

Ts

Vo =D Vg
0 1 D
8
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

switch duty cycle

Switch-Mode Power Supplies


Step-up, step-down and inverting configurations available Switching converters are ideally 100% efficient Real efficiency can be close to 100%; depends on operating conditions and implementation
Losses and efficiency will be discussed

Converters generate switching noise Discrete filter components (L, C) are required Higher switching frequency => smaller L, C
Component selection will be discussed

Duty cycle is the control variable Closed-loop output voltage control is usually applied
Dynamic models and control will be discussed
9
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Impact of efficiency: a system example


uP/DSP core mode % of time in this mode Load current Io [mA] Linear regulator Efficiency [%] Battery current Ig [mA] Average Ig in this mode [mA] 4.45 Efficiency [%] Battery current Ig [mA] Average Ig in this mode [mA] 2.12 29.1 0.14 0.13 78.4 0.53 0.02 93.7 4.45 0.13 93.0 44.82 1.12 87.7 142.60 0.71 Stand-by 90.0 0.1 34.7 0.12 0.11 Wait 4.0 1.0 40.9 1.02 0.04 Run1 3.0 10.0 41.6 10.02 0.30 Run2 2.5 100.0 41.7 100.02 2.50 FullRun 0.5 300.0 41.7 300.02 1.50

Total linear reg average Ig [mA] SMPS

Total SMPS average Ig [mA]

Example: Vg = 3.6 V Vo = 1.5 V 0 < Io < 300 mA


10
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Advantages of using SMPS over Linear regulators


SMPS results in significantly lower average battery current High efficiency over a wide range of loads and output voltages is achieved with a SMPS SMPS with low quiescent current modes provide longer battery life for mobile systems that spend most of their time in stand-by

11
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Buck regulators in the system


Power distribution: Vg = 2.8-5.5 V
PS 3.6 V PS 2.5 V 1.5 V PS

Battery

Charger

Buck SMPS regulators


1-3.6 V

PS

Antenna

Display
PS 2.7-5.5 V

Audio Interface

P/DSP core I/O


Baseband digital 2.5 V PS

D/A
LO

PA
LNA

A/D
Analog/RF 2.5 V PS

2.5 V PS

Buck regulators are often used as switch-mode power supplies for baseband digital core and the RF power amplifier (PA)
12
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Device/Converter Specifications
Static voltage regulation
DC output voltage precision, i.e., % variation with respect to the nominal value over: input voltage range (line regulation) output load range (load regulation) temperature

Dynamic voltage regulation


Load transient response, including peak output voltage variation and settling time for a step load transient Line transient response, including output voltage variation and settling time for a step input voltage transient
13
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Device/Converter Specifications
Overvoltage protection
prevents the output voltage from rising above a specified limit

Undervoltage shutdown
turns the device off if the input (battery) voltage drops below a specified threshold

Current limiting (overload protection)


limits the load current

Thermal shutdown
turns the device off if the temperature exceeds a specified threshold

14
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Device/Converter Specifications
Frequency synchronization
allows synchronization of the switching frequency to an external system clock

Soft start
controlled output voltage increase during startup

Shut-down and operating-mode control


enables a system controller to shut-down the device, or to select an operating mode(PWM,PFM,LDO)

Adjustment of the output voltage using


a resistive voltage divider, external analog control voltage, or digital (pin-select) control
15
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Buck converter analysis


1

iL (t)

L + vL (t) + iC(t) R v(t)

Vg

iL(t)

L + vL(t) iC(t) R + v(t)


Vg +

L + v L(t) iL(t) C iC(t) R v(t) +

Vg

Switch in position 1

Switch in position 2
16
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Switch in position 1
iL (t)
Inductor voltage:

L + vL(t) iC(t) R + v(t)

vL = Vg v(t )
Small-ripple approximation:

Vg

vL Vg V
Knowing the voltage, we can solve for the current from: Solve for the slope:

diL vL Vg V = dt L L

diL vL = L dt

Therefore, the inductor current increases in time with an essentially constant slope.
17
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Switch in position 2
L
Inductor voltage:

+ vL (t) Vg + iL (t) C

vL = v (t )
Small-ripple approximation:

iC(t) R

+ v(t)

vL V
Knowing the voltage, we can solve for the current from: Solve for the slope:

diL vL = L dt

diL vL V = dt L L

Therefore, the inductor current decreases in time with an essentially constant slope.
18
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Inductor voltage and current waveforms


vL(t)
Vg V DTs D'Ts V Switch position: iL(t) 1 2 1

iL(DTs)

I iL(0)

iL

DTs

Ts

t
19

2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Average voltage across the inductor equals zero


vL(t) Vg V Total area t V

DTs
Ts

vL =

1 vL dt = D (Vg V ) + (1 D )(V ) = 0 Ts 0 V = DVg

The DC output voltage is directly proportional to the input voltage and the switch duty cycle
20
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Average inductor current equals the output current


1

iL (t)

L + vL(t)

IO

i C(t) R

+ v(t)

Vg

v (t ) V iC (t ) = iL (t ) iL (t ) = iL (t ) I o R R
We know that the average capacitor current equals zero

iC

1 = iC dt = iL I o = 0 Ts 0

Ts

iL = I o

In steady state, the average inductor current equals the load current
21
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Light-load operation: CCM and DCM


iL (t )
without zero cross detect

high I o low I o

Inductor current reverses polarity at light loads

iL (t )
with zero cross detect

high I o low I o

t
Inductor current drops to zero before the end of the cycle: Discontinuous conduction mode (DCM)

22
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Implementing Zero-cross detect


S1

iL(t)

L + vL(t) iC(t)

Io + v(t)

Vg +

C
S2

S2 is turned OFF

S2 control logic

S2

With the zero-crossing comparator the switch S2 operates as a diode, resulting in DCM and improved efficiency at light loads All switchers in the LM26XX family have this feature
23
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

CCM vs. DCM


In DCM, the inductor current is always positive At light loads, in DCM, the duty cycle is significantly lower than in CCM CCM operation at light loads is undesirable because the reversal of the inductor current polarity contributes to conduction losses, while it does not contribute to the output load current With a diode rectifier, DCM operation occurs automatically because of the diode characteristic With a synchronous rectifier, DCM operation at light loads can be accomplished by turning off the NMOS switch at the zero-crossing of the inductor current

24
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

DCM/CCM boundary
Boundary between constant-frequency CCM and constant-frequency DCM depends on the circuit parameters and the load At the CCM/DCM boundary the inductor current ripple equals the output load current:

Vg V V I o = iL = = ICCM / DCM 2 Lf s Vg
If Io > ICCM/DCM, the buck converter operates in CCM If Io < ICCM/DCM, the buck converter operates in DCM

25
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Static characteristic in DCM


V D2 = Vg D 2 + 2 Lf s I o Vg
2 VL fs I o D= Vg (Vg V )

As the load Io in DCM decreases, the duty cycle D must decrease to keep the output V in regulation Minimum possible on-time tp,min of the PMOS limits the minimum load current Io,min in constantfrequency PWM mode for which the output stays in regulation: If the output load current is reduced beyond Io,min the output voltage will start to rise and over voltage protection will activate.

I o ,min =

Vg V Vg V 2L

t 2 ,min f s p
26
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Determination of the inductor current ripple magnitude


iL(t) I iL(0) iL(DTs)

iL

DTs

Ts

(change in iL) = (slope)x(length of subinterval) Current ripple magnitude

2iL =

Vg V L

DTs

Basic inductance selection eq.

iL =

Vg V 2 Lf s

L=

Vg V 2iL f s

D
27

2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

iC(t) Total charge q

0
DTs

vC(t) V

Output capacitor voltage ripple 1 Ts q = C ( 2v ) q = iL 2 2 i t iL T /2 (neglecting esr) ( 2 v ) D'T 4Cf s iL ( 2 v ) [2D 1 + 8ResrCf s ] 4Cf s v
L s s

(including esr)

The peak to peak output voltage ripple is the larger of the two values in the equations above.The equations can be used as capacitance selection equations if a target peak to peak output voltage ripple is known.
28
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Practice problem: selection of L and C


LM2612 is used to generate the output voltage of V = 1.5V at the max. DC output current of Io = 300 mA The input voltage is between Vg = 2.8V and Vg = 5.5V Select L and C so that: the worst-case peak current ripple is iL = 120 mA, and the worst-case peak-to-peak output voltage ripple is 2v = 5 mV

29
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Inductor selection
Vg V V V 1 V 1 L= D= = 2iL f s 2iL f s Vg 2iL f s Vg Vg V
LM2612 datasheet: Switching frequency is between fsmin = 468 kHz and fsmax = 732 kHz

V 1 L 2iL f s min

1 V V g max

= 9.7 H

A 10H inductor is chosen in the datasheet


30
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Output filter capacitor selection

1 iL C= 4 f s ( 2 v )
1 iL max C = 12.8F 4 f s min (2v)
A 22F ceramic capacitor is chosen in the datasheet. A 10F capacitor can also be used with slightly higher output ripple, in case the load transient requirements are not demanding.
31
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Input current waveform


1

iL (t)

L + vL (t) iC(t) R + v(t)

ig (t )
Vg +
2

Cg
ig (t)

Input current is pulsating, with large switching-noise component Input filter (decoupling) capacitor is mandatory to reduce the input voltage noise and ensure proper operation of the device to prevent propagation of the switching noise to other system components
32
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Capacitor ripple currents


2iL Ripple Current Ratio = =r IO

Irms Input Capacitor = IO

r2 D(1 D + ) 12 r 12

(Vg Vo) D r= L fs min IO

Irms Output Capacitor = IO

L = 10 H
r = 0.962

Vg = 3.6 V

Vo = 1.8 V

fs min = 468 kHz


Io = 400 mA
r = 0.481

Io = 200 mA
Irms Input Capacitor = 107 mA Irms Output Capacitor = 56 mA

Irms Input Capacitor = 204 mA

Irms Output Capacitor = 56 mA


33
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Capacitors : How small can I go ?


Output Capacitor Input Capacitor

When reducing the value of output capacitors ensure proper gain and phase margins and evaluate line/load transient performance and whether it meets requirements.
34
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Switch realization with a synchronous rectifier

Synchronous Buck
PMOS: main switch
PMOS

NMOS: synchronous rectifier


ip(t) in(t)
NMOS

iL(t)

L iC(t)

Io + v(t)

+ + v (t) L vsw(t) C

Vg

vp

vn

drivers

n p

Switch control signals

p n td1 td2 dead times

Dead times are used to prevent short-circuit current through PMOS/NMOS

35
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Switch currents
Average and RMS values
i p (t )

I p = i p (t ) DI o

I p ,rms =
t
in (t )

i 2 (t ) D I o p

I n = in (t ) (1 D) I o
t

I n,rms =

in2 (t ) 1 D I o

Switch on-resistance and forward voltage drops result in switch conduction losses
36
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Conduction-loss models
_

vON body diode

_
Ron,p + vON i p(t) _ vn
ON

+ vON body diode i n(t) _


OFF

Ron,n _ vON

i p(t) + vSG _ vp
ON OFF

i n(t) +

vGS +

PMOS: On-resistance Ron,p


_ vON + in(t)

NMOS: On-resistance Ron,n


L iL(t)

RD _ vON

VD

in(t) +

RL winding + resistance

ideal L vL _

i L(t)

Diode: Forward voltage drop VD in series with on-resistance RD

Winding resistance RL
37
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Buck circuit when the PMOS is ON


Ron,p + + Vg vON ip (t) _ RL winding + resistance ideal L vL _ iL(t) Io + V _

v L = Vg ( Ron , p + RL )iL v Vg ( Ron , p + RL ) I o V

iL I o

38
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Buck circuit when the NMOS is ON


RL winding + resistance ideal L vL _ + V _ iL (t) Io

R on,n

Vg

v L = ( Ron, n + RL )iL v ( Ron , n + RL ) I o V

ig = 0
39
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Steady-state model with conduction losses


Inductor volt-second balance: Input current: I g = i g = DI o
vL = 0

V = DVg ( DRon , p + (1 D )Ron , n + RL ) I o


V + Io ( Ron , n + RL ) Duty cycle considering losses D = Vg + Io ( Ron , n Ron , p ) Equivalent steady-state circuit model with conduction losses:
Ig DRon,p + (1-D)Ron,n + RL Io + Vg + DIo + DV g R V
40
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Switching losses
Switching losses are proportional to the switching frequency Switching loss mechanisms:
Charging/discharging of capacitance at MOSFET gates and switch node Inductive switching transitions Body-diode reverse recovery Oscillator and other misc. controller losses Inductor eddy-current and core losses

41
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Improving light-load efficiency


In PWM mode, light-load efficiency is reduced because a significant portion of switching losses does not scale with load In PWM mode, the oscillator and the power switches are always switching at high switching frequency Low-power modes are based on the idea of reducing the switching frequency in proportion to the load If the switching frequency is proportional to load, high efficiency can be maintained over a very wide range of loads
42
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Switching frequency in PFM mode


tp =
Ipeak iL
I o = iL

LI peak Vg Vo
LI peak Vo

tn =

tp

tn

Ts

1 I o = I peak (t p + t n ) f s 2

2Vo I o Vo f s = 2 1 LI peak Vg

In PFM, the switching frequency is directly proportional to the load current


43
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Output voltage ripple in PFM


Ipeak iL
I o = iL

tp

tn

Ts
2 LI peak

( 2v )

I peak 2C

(t p + t n ) =

Vg

2C Vo (Vg Vo )

The output voltage ripple is typically higher in PFM than in constant-frequency PWM mode
44
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

PWM/PFM Combination
100% 90% 80% 70%

Efficiency

60% 50% 40% 30% 20%

Vin = 3.6V
10% 0% 0.1 1 10 100 1000

Iout in mA

LM2618 PFM

LM2618 PWM

High efficiency over very wide range of loads Low IQ

45

2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Discussion of Operating Modes


Best efficiency at moderate to heavy load Constant-frequency, low switching noise Synchronization to external clock possible Relatively high IQ and poor lightload efficiency

PWM

LDO
LDO: linear regulator Low-noise Very low IQ Simple controller

PFM
High efficiency over very wide load range Very low IQ Simple controller Increased output voltage ripple
46
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

PWM/LDO Combination

Example: LM2608

PWM

LDO

PFM

High efficiency (moderate-to-heavy load) Low noise: Constant-frequency operation No switching noise at very light loads (LDO) Very low IQ 47
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

PWM/PFM Combination

PWM

Examples: LM2612/LM2614

LDO

PFM

High efficiency over very wide range of loads Low IQ


48
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Selection Guide

49
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Control approaches in constant-frequency PWM mode

Voltage-mode control
The switch duty cycle is controlled based on output voltage sensing

Current-mode control
The switch duty cycle is controlled based on output voltage and switch current sensing

50
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Voltage-Mode Control Architecture


Power input iL(t) + vg (t) + vsw(t) Gate drivers p n Compensator Pulse-width modulator
p(t) vc(t)

L + vL(t) C iC(t)

Io Load + v(t) Feedback connection

Dead-time

vc

G c (s) Voltage reference Vref


t

dTs Ts

Controller chip
51
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Current-Mode Control Architecture


Power input ip(t) L + vL(t) + C vsw(t) Gate drivers p n Rsip (t) Compensator vc Gc(s) Voltage reference Vref
t

iL(t) iC(t)

Io Load + v(t) Feedback connection

vg(t) +

Dead-time

Current-mode modulator
p(t) v c(t)

dTs Ts

Controller chip
52
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Current-mode summary
Advantages of current-mode control
Simpler, approximately single-pole responses Inherent rejection of line disturbances Built-in over-current protection

LM26XX family is based on current-mode architecture LM2608/12/18 feature internal compensation LM2614/19 require external compensation
53
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Important definitions
Cross-over frequency fc is the frequency where the magnitude response of the loop gain drops to 1, i.e. 0 dB T ( jwc ) = 1 0 dB Phase margin PM is the difference between the phase of the loop gain at the cross-over frequency and -180o

PM = phase [T ( jwc )] + 180o


Gain margin GM (in dB) is the negative of the loop-gain magnitude response (in dB) at the frequency fm where the phase of the loop gain equals -180o

GM = 20 log T ( jwm ) , phase [T ( jwm )] = 180o


54
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Example of finding phase and gain margins


1 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 10. 100. 1000. 10000.

GM

PM

10.

100.

1000.

10000.

100000.

f c 10 KHz

PM = 71o

GM = 24 dB
55
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Current Mode Power Stage Model


L
Vo Ro gm ESR
C

Vc

Vo gm ( Ro // R ) (1 + s ESR C ) Vc (1 + s ( Ro // R ) C ) (1 + s L ) Ro
56
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Closed Loop Regulator Model


L
Vo
ESR C
IF:

R3 C 4 ( Ro // R) C
1 Fc 2 ESR C 1 Fc

Ro

gm

Vc

Ao
+ -

Vref Rp

L 2 Ro Fc

R3
Loop Gain

C4

gm R o // R 2 Rp C 4

( g m Ro // R Ao) (1 + s ESR C ) (1 + s R 3 C 4 ) L (1 + s Ro // R C ) (1 + s ) (1 + s Rp C 4 Ao) Ro


57
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Compensation Example
Objective: To compensate a LM2614 to get a stable system
R = 10 Load resistance C = 10 F Output capacitor ESR = 10 m ESR of output capacitor L = 10 H Inductor
The load pole = 1 = 4.8 kHz 2 ( R // Ro) C Ro = 80 kHz 2 L

The high frequency pole = The ESR zero =

Ro = 5 Small signal output resistance gm = 1 mho Transconductance of power stage Rp = ( R1 // R2) + 5 k R1,R2 are external feedback resistor dividers,5 kO is internal

1 = 1.6 MHz (high enough to ignore ) 2 ESR C

Rp = 33 k
Ao = 10000
Open loop gain of error amplifier

58
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Compensation Example
We now need to choose the values of R3 and C4 to give a stable regulator response. If we set the zero frequency of R3 and C4 equal to the load pole frequency, and we choose a loop gain crossover frequency, Fc, much lower than the high frequency pole, then we can assume that the loop gain has a first order response. By choosing Fc = 30 kHz, the 80 kHz pole will contribute only 20 degrees of phase lag at Fc. This should give us a phase margin of about 90-tan-1(30/80) = 90-20 = 70 degrees.
C4 = gm ( Ro // R ) = 536 pF 680 pF 2 Fc Rp ( Ro // R ) C = 49 k 47 k C4

R3 =

This should give a stable regulator. Of course the real circuit should be checked under all conditions to ensure a stable system. This is only one of the methods to stabilize a regulator. Any other small signal methods that apply to feedback systems, will work here as well.

59
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Compensation guidelines
Typically we like to choose a crossover frequency as high as possible. This gives a regulator with a fast transient response. However, if Fc is too close to the high frequency pole, of the power stage, the phase margin will be degraded. If we chose a Fc in the previous example of 75 kHz, then the phase margin would only be 47 degrees. Given the fact that these equations are only approximate, the phase margin of the real circuit will probably be smaller. This will give a ringy transient response. Lower crossover frequencies give a slower regulator, but tend to be more stable, and more on-the-safeside. The size of the output capacitor is also a compromise. Smaller gives more under/overshoot during a load transient and slightly higher output voltage ripple. However, with regulators that are internally compensated, smaller values of output capacitor will tend to increase Fc and therefore decrease phase margin. Large values of output capacitor will give small under/over-shoot and ripple, but are physically larger. Parts such as the LM2614, with external compensation, are much more flexible with regards to output capacitor value. In any case, it is always best to stay within the range given in the datasheet.
60
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Line Transient Measurements


+15V
220pF(C) 10 F 50K 50K

1000 F

0.5 H (L)

Pulse Generator Output

LM12CL 30 10F

DUT

50

-15V

1000 F

Adjust L and C to minimise overshoots


600mV

30 s

61
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Load Transient Measurements

Pulse Load

Constant Load

Function Generator Output 50

IRF 510

DUT

62
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Layout guidelines
Electrical guidelines
component placement and length of traces width of traces curling of critical current loops routing of sensitive traces ground pins and ground plane voltage regulator placement on the system board

Mechanical guidelines

63
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Critical current loops in a buck regulator


Ig
1

L + + C

Io

Vg

vs (t)

v(t)

Load

The critical current loops carry large currents with significant switching ripples
64
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Component placement and length of traces

Loop 1 Loop 2

The two critical loops carry large switching currents and act as antennas that radiate switching noise Place C1, chip, L, and C2 as close as possible, to minimize the area of the two critical current loops
65
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Routing of sensitive traces

Route noise sensitive traces, such as the voltage feedback path, away from the critical current loops with noisy traces between power components

66
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Ground pins and ground plane


Connect the chip ground pins and the filter capacitor ground pins using a large component-side fill Connect this area to the ground plane using several vias This approach prevents large switching currents from circulating through the ground plane, and reduces ground bounce to the chip
67
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

Voltage regulator placement

sensitive analog/RF

Place switching regulator away from sensitive analog/RF subsystems

68
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

References and Acknowledgements

R.W.Erickson, D.Maksimovic, Fundamentals of Power Electronics, 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, ISBN 0-7923-7270-0 LM26XX Data Sheets, National Semiconductor Corporation
LM2608,LM2612,LM2614,LM2618,LM2619

Dragan Maksimovic, Associate Professor, ECE Dept, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

69
2003 National Semiconductor Corporation

70

You might also like