You are on page 1of 6

17/10/2014 Global-warming potential - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global-warming_potential 1/6
Global-warming potential
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Global warming potential)
Global-warming potential (GWP) is a relative measure of how much heat a greenhouse gas traps in the
atmosphere. It compares the amount of heat trapped by a certain mass of the gas in question to the
amount of heat trapped by a similar mass of carbon dioxide. A GWP is calculated over a specific time
interval, commonly 20, 100 or 500 years. GWP is expressed as a factor of carbon dioxide (whose GWP
is standardized to 1). For example, the 20 year GWP of methane is 86, which means that if the same
mass of methane and carbon dioxide were introduced into the atmosphere, that methane will trap 86
times more heat than the carbon dioxide over the next 20 years.
[1]
The substances subject to restrictions under the Kyoto protocol either are rapidly increasing their
concentrations in Earth's atmosphere or have a large GWP.
The GWP depends on the following factors:
the absorption of infrared radiation by a given species
the spectral location of its absorbing wavelengths
the atmospheric lifetime of the species
Thus, a high GWP correlates with a large infrared absorption and a long atmospheric lifetime. The
dependence of GWP on the wavelength of absorption is more complicated. Even if a gas absorbs
radiation efficiently at a certain wavelength, this may not affect its GWP much if the atmosphere already
absorbs most radiation at that wavelength. A gas has the most effect if it absorbs in a "window" of
wavelengths where the atmosphere is fairly transparent. The dependence of GWP as a function of
wavelength has been found empirically and published as a graph.
[2]
Because the GWP of a greenhouse gas depends directly on its infrared spectrum, the use of infrared
spectroscopy to study greenhouse gases is centrally important in the effort to understand the impact of
human activities on global climate change.
Contents
1 Calculating the global-warming potential
1.1 Use in Kyoto Protocol
2 Global Temperature change Potential (GTP)
3 Importance of time horizon
4 Values
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
Calculating the global-warming potential
17/10/2014 Global-warming potential - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global-warming_potential 2/6
Just as radiative forcing provides a simplified means of comparing the various factors that are believed
to influence the climate system to one another, global-warming potentials (GWPs) are one type of
simplified index based upon radiative properties that can be used to estimate the potential future impacts
of emissions of different gases upon the climate system in a relative sense. GWP is based on a number of
factors, including the radiative efficiency (infrared-absorbing ability) of each gas relative to that of
carbon dioxide, as well as the decay rate of each gas (the amount removed from the atmosphere over a
given number of years) relative to that of carbon dioxide.
[3]
The radiative forcing capacity (RF) is the amount of energy per unit area, per unit time, absorbed by
the greenhouse gas, that would otherwise be lost to space. It can be expressed by the formula:
where the subscript i represents an interval of 10 inverse centimeters. Abs
i
represents the integrated
infrared absorbance of the sample in that interval, and F
i
represents the RF for that interval.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides the generally accepted values for
GWP, which changed slightly between 1996 and 2001. An exact definition of how GWP is calculated is
to be found in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment Report
(http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/247.htm). The GWP is defined as the ratio of the time-
integrated radiative forcing from the instantaneous release of 1 kg of a trace substance relative to that of
1 kg of a reference gas:
where TH is the time horizon over which the calculation is considered; a
x
is the radiative efficiency due
to a unit increase in atmospheric abundance of the substance (i.e., Wm
2
kg
1
) and [x(t)] is the time-
dependent decay in abundance of the substance following an instantaneous release of it at time t=0. The
denominator contains the corresponding quantities for the reference gas (i.e. CO
2
). The radiative
efficiencies a
x
and a
r
are not necessarily constant over time. While the absorption of infrared radiation
by many greenhouse gases varies linearly with their abundance, a few important ones display non-linear
behaviour for current and likely future abundances (e.g., CO
2
, CH
4
, and N
2
O). For those gases, the
relative radiative forcing will depend upon abundance and hence upon the future scenario adopted.
Since all GWP calculations are a comparison to CO
2
which is non-linear, all GWP values are affected.
Assuming otherwise as is done above will lead to lower GWPs for other gases than a more detailed
approach would. Clarifying this, while increasing CO
2
has less and less effect on radiative absorption as
ppm concentrations rise, more powerful greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide have different
thermal absorption frequencys to CO
2
that are not filled up (saturated) as much as CO
2
, so rising ppms
of these gases are far more significant.
Use in Kyoto Protocol
17/10/2014 Global-warming potential - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global-warming_potential 3/6
Under the Kyoto Protocol, the Conference of the Parties decided (decision 2/CP.3) that the values of
GWP calculated for the IPCC Second Assessment Report are to be used for converting the various
greenhouse gas emissions into comparable CO
2
equivalents when computing overall sources and
sinks.
[4]
Global Temperature change Potential (GTP)
The Global Temperature change Potential is another way to quantify the ratio change from a substance
relative to that of CO
2
, in global mean surface temperature, used for a specific time span.
[5]
Importance of time horizon
Note that a substance's GWP depends on the timespan over which the potential is calculated. A gas
which is quickly removed from the atmosphere may initially have a large effect but for longer time
periods as it has been removed becomes less important. Thus methane has a potential of 34 over 100
years but 86 over 20 years; conversely sulfur hexafluoride has a GWP of 22,800 over 100 years but
16,300 over 20 years (IPCC TAR). The GWP value depends on how the gas concentration decays over
time in the atmosphere. This is often not precisely known and hence the values should not be considered
exact. For this reason when quoting a GWP it is important to give a reference to the calculation.
The GWP for a mixture of gases can not be determined from the GWP of the constituent gases by any
form of simple linear addition.
Commonly, a time horizon of 100 years is used by regulators (e.g., the California Air Resources Board).
Values
Carbon dioxide has a GWP of exactly 1 (since it is the baseline unit to which all other greenhouse gases
are compared).
GWP values and lifetimes from 2013 IPCC AR5 p714
(with climate-carbon feedbacks)
[6]
Lifetime (years)
GWP time horizon
20 years 100 years
Methane 12.4 86 34
HFC-134a (hydrofluorocarbon) 13.4 3790 1550
CFC-11 (chlorofluorocarbon) 45.0 7020 5350
Nitrous oxide (N
2
O)
121.0 268 298
Carbon tetrafluoride (CF
4
)
50000 4950 7350
17/10/2014 Global-warming potential - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global-warming_potential 4/6
GWP values and lifetimes from 2007 IPCC
AR4 p212
[7]
(2001 IPCC TAR
[8]
in parentheses)
Lifetime
(years)
GWP time horizon
20 years 100 years 500 years
Methane 12 (12) 72 (62) 25 (23) 7.6 (7)
Nitrous oxide
114
(114)
289
(275)
298
(296)
153
(156)
HFC-23 (hydrofluorocarbon)
270
(260)
12,000
(9400)
14,800
(12,000)
12,200
(10,000)
HFC-134a (hydrofluorocarbon)
14
(13.8)
3,830
(3,300)
1,430
(1,300)
435
(400)
Sulfur hexafluoride
3200
(3,200)
16,300
(15,100)
22,800
(22,200)
32,600
(32,400)
Although water vapour has a significant influence with regard to absorbing infrared radiation (which is
the green house effect; see greenhouse gas), its GWP is not calculated. Its concentration in the
atmosphere mainly depends on air temperature. There is no possibility to directly influence atmospheric
water vapour concentration.
The values given in the table assume the same mass of compound is released. This must not be confused
with chemical reactions in which masses change from reactants to products. For instance, burning
methane to carbon dioxide would indeed reduce the global warming impact, but by a smaller factor than
the one given in the table because the mass of methane burning is lesser than the mass of carbon dioxide
released (ratio 1:2.75).
[9]
If you started with 1 tonne of methane which has a GWP of 25, after
combustion you have 2.75 tonnes of CO
2
, each tonne of which has a GWP of 1. The effect of this
burning is to reduce the Global warming effect of the gas released in the ratio 25:2.75 or by about 9.
Similarly, for each tonne of methane burned to CO
2
, the release of tonne CO
2
equivalent is reduced by
25 2.75 = 22.25.
The global warming potential of perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) over a 100year time horizon has been
estimated to be approximately 7100.
[10]
It has been used by the electrical industry since the mid-20th
century for electronic testing and as a heat transfer agent.
[11]
PFTBA has the highest radiative
efficiency (relative effectiveness of greenhouse gases to restrict long-wave radiation from escaping back
into space
[12]
) of any molecule detected in the atmosphere to date.
[13]
The researchers found an average
of 0.18 parts per trillion of PFTBA in Toronto air samples, whereas carbon dioxide exists around 400
parts per million.
[14]
See also
Carbon dioxide equivalent
Emission factor
Emission standard
Radiative forcing
Total equivalent warming impact
References
17/10/2014 Global-warming potential - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global-warming_potential 5/6
1. ^ "Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis" (http://www.climatechange2013.org/report/full-
report/). IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I
to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ch.8, p. 714, Table 8.7.
2013. Retrieved 2014-02-13.
2. ^ Matthew Elrod, "Greenhouse Warming Potential Model."
(http://www.chem.tamu.edu/rgroup/north/ITS%20GWP%20Data.xls) Based on Elrod, M. J. (1999).
"Greenhouse Warming Potentials from the Infrared Spectroscopy of Atmospheric Gases". Journal of
Chemical Education 76 (12): 1702. doi:10.1021/ed076p1702 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1021%2Fed076p1702).
3. ^ "Glossary: Global warming potential (GWP)" (http://www.eia.gov/tools/glossary/index.cfm?id=G). U.S.
Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 2011-04-26. "An index used to compare the relative radiative
forcing of different gases without directly calculating the changes in atmospheric concentrations. GWPs are
calculated as the ratio of the radiative forcing that would result from the emission of one kilogram of a
greenhouse gas to that from the emission of one kilogram of carbon dioxide over a fixed period of time, such
as 100 years."
4. ^ Conference of the Parties (25 March 1998). "Methodological issues related to the Kyoto Protocol"
(http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop3/07a01.pdf). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its third session,
held at Kyoto from 1 to 11 December 1997 Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the
Parties at its third session. UNFCCC. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
5. ^ "IPCC AR5 - Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing (Chapter 8 / page 663)"
(http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf). 2013.
6. ^ Myhre, G., D. Shindell, F.-M. Bron, W. Collins, J. Fuglestvedt, J. Huang, D. Koch, J.-F. Lamarque, D.
Lee, B. Mendoza, T. Nakajima, A. Robock, G. Stephens, T. Takemura and H. Zhang (2013) "Anthropogenic
and Natural Radiative Forcing"
(http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf). In: Climate Change
2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J.
Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing
(http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf)
7. ^ Forster, P., V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D.W. Fahey, J. Haywood, J. Lean, D.C.
Lowe, G. Myhre, J. Nganga, R. Prinn, G. Raga, M. Schulz and R. Van Dorland (2007) "Changes in
Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing" (http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-
wg1-chapter2.pdf). In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I
to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., D. Qin,
M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.). Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
8. ^ "6.12.2 Direct GWPs" (http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/248.htm) in IPCC Third Assessment
Report Climate Change 2001. GRID-Arendal (2003)
9. ^ This is so, because of the reaction formula: CH
4
+ 2O
2
CO
2
+ 2 H
2
O. As mentioned in the article, the
oxygen and water is not considered for GWP purposes, and one molecule of methane (molar mass = 16.04 g
mol
1
) will yield one molecule of carbon dioxide (molar mass = 44.01 g mol
1
. This give a mass ratio of
2.74. (44.01/16.042.74).
17/10/2014 Global-warming potential - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global-warming_potential 6/6
External links
2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) by Working Group 1 (http://ipcc-
wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html) (WG1) and Chapter 2 of that report (Changes in Atmospheric
Constituents and in Radiative Forcing (http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-
wg1-chapter2.pdf)) which contains GWP information.
2001 IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) page on Global-Warming Potentials
(http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/247.htm) and Direct GWP
(http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/248.htm).
List of Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes (http://www.epa.gov/nonco2/econ-
inv/table.html) from the U.S. EPA
An overview of the role of H
2
O as a greenhouse gas (http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?
p=142) from RealClimate
GWP and the different meanings of CO
2
e explained
(http://www.darkoptimism.org/2008/09/03/the-climate-science-translation-guide/)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global-
warming_potential&oldid=627668423"
Categories: Greenhouse gas emissions Climate forcing Infrared spectroscopy
This page was last modified on 30 September 2014 at 11:47.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms
may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a
registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
10. ^ Hong, Angela C.; Cora J. Young; Michael D. Hurley; Timothy J. Wallington; Scott A. Mabury (28
November 2013). "Perfluorotributylamine: A novel long-lived greenhouse gas". Geophysical Research Letters
40 (22): 60106015. doi:10.1002/2013GL058010 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F2013GL058010).
11. ^ New Greenhouse Gas Discovered, PFTBA Has Higher Global Warming Impact Than CO2
(http://www.ibtimes.com/new-greenhouse-gas-discovered-pftba-has-higher-global-warming-impact-co2-
1503600). Ibtimes.com (2013-12-10). Retrieved on 2014-04-23.
12. ^ Radiative efficiency definition of Radiative efficiency in the Free Online Encyclopedia
(http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Radiative+efficiency). Encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com.
Retrieved on 2014-04-23.
13. ^ Newly discovered greenhouse gas '7,000 times more powerful than CO2' | Environment
(http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/dec/10/new-greenhouse-gas-powerful-chemical-
perfluorotributylamine). theguardian.com. 10 December 2013.
14. ^ New greenhouse gas discovered by U of T chemists | Toronto Star
(http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2013/12/11/new_greenhouse_gas_discovered_by_u_of_t_chemists.html).
Thestar.com (2013-12-11). Retrieved on 2014-04-23.

You might also like