American Structural Design Calculation

Page 1 of 3
STRUCTURAL DESIGN SOFTWARE

This web site provides structural design spreadsheets, which created using Microsoft Excel. Each spreadsheet contains both
the formulas used and the reference code sections, as well as graphic drawings. The Example is intended for reuse and is
loaded with floating comments as well as ActiveX pull-down menus for variable choices. All intermediate calculations are
intended for submittal with the calculations to explain the results of the input. It is free to download, by click spreadsheet
name, for non-business. For a package professional version of entire listed spreadsheets, Special Buy, the current price is less
than $13 per spreadsheet. And single copy of each professional spreadsheet is available with $33. Our licenses are "on your
honor". We trust our customers to decide if they need to purchase more licenses for multi-user.
Special Buy
(User's Book)
A Package Only $1260 (Total 104 software listed)
Foundation Design
Pad Footing
Flagpole
Eccentric Footing
Deep Footing
Wall Footing
Footing for DSA & OSHPD
Combined Footing
Boundary Spring Generator
Grade Beam
Plain Concrete Footing
Concrete Retaining Wall
Conventional Slab on Grade
Retaining Wall for DSA &

OSHPD
Masonry Retaining /Fence Wall
PT Slab on Ground
Restrained Retaining Wall
Footing At Piping
Concrete Pile
Concrete Design
SMRF-ACI
Column
Shear Wall - IBC
Circular Column
Shear Wall - CBC
Column Supporting Discontinuous
Tilt-up Panel
Corbel
Wall Pier
Composite Member
Slab
Development & Splice in Concrete
Anchorage To Concrete
Friction
Beam
Prestressed Member
Mechanical Unit Anchorage
Deep Beam
(Concrete & Wood)
Punching
PT Concrete Floor
Coupling Beam
Masonry Design
Masonry Shear Wall
(ACI 530)
Bending Post at Top Wall
Masonry Shear Wall
(UBC 97)
Anchorage To Masonry
(ACI 530
& UBC)
Masonry Bearing Wall
(ACI 530 &
UBC)
Girder at Wall
http://www.engineering-international.com/
Horizontal Bending Wall

Development & Splice in
Masonry
11/24/2005
Page 2 of 3
Masonry Beam
(ACI 530 & UBC)
Masonry Column
Elevator Wall for DSA &

OSHPD
(ACI 530 & UBC)
Wood Design
Wood Joist
Top Plate Connection
Double Joist
Wood Bolt Connection
Wood Beam
Shear Wall with Openings
Wood Column
Toe Nail
Wood Shear Wall
Diaphragm-Ledger-CMU
Wood Diaphragm
Drag Forces
Sub-Diaphragm
Steel Design
Metal Studs
(Joist, Beam, Wall, Column)
Web-Tapered Girder
OCBF-IBC
Composite Floor Beam
OCBF-UBC
Base Plate
SCBF-IBC
Beam Connection
SCBF-UBC
Brace Connection
EBF-IBC
WF-Opening
EBF-UBC
Bolts Connections
OMRF-IBC
Weld Connections
OMRF-UBC
Roof Deck
SMRF-IBC
Floor Deck
SMRF-UBC
Steel Joists
Beam Gravity
Joist Girder
Beam with Torsion
Steel Stair
Plate Girder
Lateral Analysis & Design Loads

Wind ASCE 7-98
(for IBC 2000)
Wall Lateral Force-UBC
Wind ASCE 7-02
(for IBC 2003)
Guardrail
Wind-UBC
Sign
Seismic-IBC 2000
Snow
Seismic-IBC 2003
Live Load
Seismic-UBC
Flexible Diaphragm
Opening
Lateral Frame Formulas
Wall Lateral Force-IBC
(ASCE 7-98, ASCE 7-02, &

UBC 97)
(IBC 2000 &
IBC 2003)
Technical Support
You will receive, by email attachment, your purchased spreadsheets within 48 hours. For package purchaser, please provide
an email box with 40 MB space available. The purchasers name will be put on left top of each spreadsheet to replace the
existing logo. Macro is required when opening the spreadsheets to get full functions. We will constantly enhance the
11/24/2005
Page 3 of 3
programs. The licensed owners will receive updated spreadsheets if requested, or new spreadsheets for the package owners
only. When you email us your questions, please tell us your name, purchased license number, phone number, and give a
decent problem description.
Disclaimer
We do not provide unprotected spreadsheet, original software code. DO NOT UNPROTECT the spreadsheets, using "brute
force" methods or VBA procedure in particular, otherwise some steps and database will be inadequate at random times.
We intend that the analysis contained in the spreadsheets is accurate and reliable, but it is entirely the responsibility of the
program user to verify the accuracy and applicability of any results obtained from the spreadsheets. Daniel T. Li Engineering
Internationals entire liability shall be limited to the purchase price of the spreadsheets.
Copyright 2002-2005 Daniel T. Li Engineering International, All Rights Reserved.
11/24/2005
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Pad Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
DESIGN SUMMARY
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
in
FOOTING WIDTH
3.00
COLUMN DEPTH
c2
in
FOOTING LENGTH
4.00
ft
BASE PLATE WIDTH
b1
16
in
FOOTING THICKNESS
12
in
BASE PLATE DEPTH
b2
16
in
LONGITUDINAL REINF.
15
in o.c.
FOOTING CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
2.5
ksi
TRANSVERSE REINF.
14
in o.c.
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
AXIAL DEAD LOAD
PDL
25
AXIAL LIVE LOAD
PLL
4.5
LATERAL LOAD (0=WIND, 1=SEISMIC)

PLAT
SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD
=
=
1
-6
Seismic,SD
k, SD
SURCHARGE
qs
ksf
SOIL WEIGHT
ws
0.11
kcf
FOOTING EMBEDMENT DEPTH
Df
ft
12
in
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
Qa
2.5
ksf
FOOTING WIDTH
FOOTING LENGTH
BOTTOM REINFORCING
B
L
=
=
#
3
4
5
=
=
=
37
29
17
FOOTING THICKNESS
ft
ft
ft
THE PAD DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS (IBC SEC.1605.3.2 & ACI 318-02 SEC.9.2.1)
CASE 1:
DL + LL
P =
30
kips
CASE 2:
DL + LL + E / 1.4
P =
25
kips
CASE 3:
0.9 DL + E / 1.4
P =
18
kips
1.2 DL + 1.6 LL
1.2 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 E
0.9 DL + 1.0 E
CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.2.2)

CASE 1
P
q MAX =
+ q S + (0.15 w S )T =
2.50 ksf,
CASE 2
2.14 ksf,
BL
q MAX
<
kQa,
Pu
Pu
Pu
CASE 3
1.56 ksf
[Satisfactory]
where k = 1 for grovity loads, 4/3 for lateral loads.

DESIGN FOR FLEXURE (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.3.5, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)
'
0.85 f c 1 1
Mu
0.383bd 2 f c'
0.85 1 f c'
MAX = 2.5
f
fy
u
u +t
MIN = MIN 0.0018
LONGITUDINAL
8.69
36
3.10
11.35
d
b
q u,max
Mu
min
As
ReqD
Max. Spacing
USE
max
Check prod < max
TRANSVERSE
8.38
48
3.10
7.00
0.001
0.001
0.39
#
5
18
in o.c.
3
#
5
0.013
[Satisfactory]
T
4
,
d
3
0.000
0.001
0.25
@ 15 in o.c.
#
5
18
in o.c.
4
#
5
0.013
[Satisfactory]
@ 14 in o.c.
kips
kips
kips
(cont'd)
CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.9.3.2.3, 15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)
V n = 2 bd f 'c
Vu
Vn
Check Vu < Vn
LONGITUDINAL
7.80
TRANSVERSE
4.52
0.75
23.5
[Satisfactory]
0.75
30.2
[Satisfactory]
CHECK PUNCHING SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.5.2, 11.12.1.2, 11.12.6, & 13.5.3.2)
V n = ( 2 + y )
where
f c' A p
97.42
kips
=
=
0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

ratio of long side to short side of concentrated load
b0
c1 + c2 + b1 + b2 + 4d
Ap
b0 d
MIN(2 , 4 / c , 40 d / b0)
V u = P u, max 1
1 b1 + c1
+d
BL
2
649.4
b2 + c2 + d
2
76.1
1.00
in
in2
2.0
29.40 ft-kips
<
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Eccentric Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
DESIGN SUMMARY
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
in
FOOTING WIDTH
16.00
ft
COLUMN DEPTH
c2
in
FOOTING LENGTH
7.00
ft
BASE PLATE WIDTH
b1
16
in
FOOTING THICKNESS
12
in
BASE PLATE DEPTH
b2
16
in
LONGITUDINAL REINF., TOP
1#5
fc'
2.5
ksi
LONGITUDINAL REINF., BOT.
23 # 5 @ 8 in o.c.
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
TRANSVERSE REINF., BOT.
6 # 5 @ 15 in o.c.
AXIAL DEAD LOAD
PDL
50
AXIAL LIVE LOAD
PLL
4.5

PLAT
SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD
=
=
1
1
Seismic,SD
k, SD
SEISMIC MOMENT LOAD
MLAT
15
ft-k, SD
SEISMIC SHEAR LOAD
VLAT
10
k, SD
SURCHARGE
qs
0.1
ksf
SOIL WEIGHT
ws
0.11
kcf
Df
ft
12
in
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
Qa
ksf
FOOTING WIDTH
B1
10
ft
B2
ft
L1
ft
L2
ft
FOOTING THICKNESS
FOOTING LENGTH
REINFORCING SIZE
THE FOOTING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CASE 1:
DL + LL
P
=
55
M
=
136
e
=
2.5
CASE 2:
DL + LL + E / 1.4
P
=
55
M
=
149
e
=
2.7
CASE 3:
0.9 DL + E / 1.4
P
=
46
M
=
125
e
=
2.7
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
1.2 DL + 1.6 LL
1.2 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 E
0.9 DL + 1.0 E
CHECK OVERTURNING FACTOR

MR / MO =
Where MO =
4.5
>
F = 1 / (0.9x1.4)
MLAT + VLAT Df - PLATL2 =
[Satisfactory]
34
k-ft
Pftg =
(0.15 kcf) T B L =
16.80
k, footing weight
Psoil =
ws (Df - T) B L =
12.32
k, soil weight
MR =
PDLL2 + 0.5 (Pftg + Psoil) L =
152
k-ft
F = 1 / (0.9x1.4) for seismic, IBC 1605.3.2

FOR REVERSED LATERAL LOADS,
MR / MO =
Where MO =
MR =
13.9
>
F = 1 / (0.9x1.4)
[Satisfactory]
MLAT + VLAT Df - PLATL1 =
29
k-ft
PDLL1 + 0.5 (Pftg + Psoil) L =
402
k-ft
Pu
Mu
eu
Pu
Mu
eu
Pu
Mu
eu
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
67
168
2.5
66
179
2.7
46
130
2.8
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
(cont'd)
Service Loads
P
e
qs B L
CASE 1
54.5
2.5
CASE 2
55.2
2.7
CASE 3
45.7
2.7
k
ft (from center of footing)
11.2
11.2
0.0
k, (surcharge load)
(0.15-ws)T B L
P
eL
4.5
70.2
1.9
> L/6
4.5
70.9
2.1
> L/6
4.0
49.7
2.5
> L/6
k, (footing increased)
k
ft
eB
1.6
< B/6
1.6
< B/6
1.8
< B/6
qL
30.0
33.7
33.6
k / ft
qmax
3.0
3.3
3.5
ksf
qallow
3.0
4.0
4.0
ksf
Where
6
1+ eL
L
L
, for e L
L
6
2 ( P )
L
, for e L >
3(0.5L e L)
6
( P )
qL =
q MAX
6e
q L 1+ B
B
,
=
B
2q L
,
3(0.5B e B )
ft
B
6
B
for e B >
6
for e B
[Satisfactory]
DESIGN FLEXURE & CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR

(ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.3.5, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, 12.5, 15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)
( Pu )
1+
6eu
L
L
, for eu
6
L
, for eu >
3B(0.5L eu)
6
qu,MAX =
BL
2 ( Pu )
'
0.85 f c 1 1
MAX =
Mu
0.383b d 2 f c'
0.85 1 f 'c
fy
MIN = MIN 0.0018
fy
FACTORED SOIL PRESSURE

Factored Loads
CASE 1
u
u +t
16
T
4
,
d
3
CASE 2
CASE 3
Pu
67.2
65.5
46.0
eu
2.5
2.7
2.8
ft
qs B L
17.9
11.2
0.0
k, (factored surcharge load)

k, (factored footing & backfill loads)
[0.15T + ws(Df - T)]BL

Pu
eu
34.9
34.9
26.2
120.1
111.6
72.2
1.4
qu, max
> L/6
1.6
2.381
> L/6
1.8
2.450
k
> L/6
ft
1.770
FOOTING MOMENT & SHEAR AT LONGITUDINAL SECTIONS FOR CASE 1

0.25 L1 0.50 L1 0.75 L1
ColL
Section
0
ColR
ksf
0.25 L2 0.50 L2 0.75 L2
Xu (ft, dist. from left of footing)
1.50
3.00
4.50
5.56
6.44
6.25
6.50
6.75
7.00
Mu,col (ft-k)
-29.4
-16.8
-33.6
-50.4
-67.2
67.2
Vu,col (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
67.2
67.2
67.2
67.2
Pu,surch (klf)
2.56
2.56
2.56
2.56
2.56
2.56
2.56
2.56
2.56
2.56
Mu,surch (ft-k)
-2.9
-11.5
-25.9
-39.6
-53.0
-50.0
-54.1
-58.3
-62.7
17.9
Vu,surch (k)
3.8
7.7
11.5
14.2
16.5
16.0
16.6
17.3
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
Mu,ftg & fill (ft-k)
-5.6
-22.5
-50.5
-77.2
-103.4
-97.5
-105.5
-113.7
-122.3
34.9
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
7.5
15.0
22.5
27.8
32.1
31.2
32.4
33.7
qu,soil (ksf)
0.00
0.51
1.02
1.53
1.89
2.19
2.13
2.21
2.30
2.38
Mu,soil (ft-k)
189.5
288.9
316.3
302.3
275.2
282.0
272.8
262.9
252.2
Vu,soil (k)
-48.2
-84.1
-107.8
-117.2
-120.3
-120.0
-120.3
-120.4
-120.1
Mu (ft-k)
181.1
254.9
239.8
185.5
89.3
117.7
79.7
40.5
Vu (kips)
-36.9
-61.5
-73.8
-75.2
-4.5
-5.6
-4.0
-2.2
(cont'd)
0.25 L1 0.50 L1 0.75 L1
ColL
0
Section
ColR
0.25 L2 0.50 L2 0.75 L2
1.50
3.00
4.50
5.56
6.44
6.25
6.50
6.75
7.00
Mu,col (ft-k)
-13.7
-1.4
-17.8
-34.1
-50.5
65.5
Vu,col (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Pu,surch (klf)
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
Mu,surch (ft-k)
-1.8
-7.2
-16.2
-24.8
-33.2
-31.3
-33.8
-36.5
-39.2
Vu,surch (k)
2.4
4.8
7.2
8.9
10.3
10.0
10.4
10.8
11.2
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
4.99
-5.6
-22.5
-50.5
-77.2
-103.4
-97.5
-105.5
-113.7
-122.3
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
7.5
15.0
22.5
27.8
32.1
31.2
32.4
33.7
34.9
qu,soil (ksf)
0.00
0.52
1.05
1.57
1.95
2.25
2.19
2.27
2.36
2.45
Mu,soil (ft-k)
175.5
263.2
282.2
264.2
235.4
242.4
232.9
222.8
212.0
Vu,soil (k)
-47.0
-81.4
-103.3
-111.1
-112.8
-112.8
-112.8
-112.4
-111.6
Mu (ft-k)
168.1
233.6
215.4
162.2
85.1
112.3
75.9
38.5
Vu (kips)
-37.1
-61.7
-73.6
-74.4
-4.9
-6.1
-4.4
-2.4

0.25 L1 0.50 L1 0.75 L1
ColL
Section
0
ColR
1.50
3.00
4.50
5.56
6.44
Mu,col (ft-k)
-5.1
Vu,col (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
46.0
0.25 L2 0.50 L2 0.75 L2

6.25
6.50
6.75
7.00
3.5
-8.0
-19.5
-31.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
0.00
Pu,surch (klf)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mu,surch (ft-k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Vu,surch (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
3.74
-4.2
-16.8
-37.9
-57.9
-77.6
-73.1
-79.1
-85.3
-91.7
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
5.6
11.2
16.8
20.8
24.1
23.4
24.3
25.3
26.2
qu,soil (ksf)
0.00
0.00
0.76
1.14
1.41
1.63
1.58
1.64
1.71
1.77
Mu,soil (ft-k)
0.0
167.5
175.2
160.3
139.1
144.2
137.4
130.2
122.7
Vu,soil (k)
0.0
-55.2
-69.2
-73.6
-73.7
-74.0
-73.6
-73.0
-72.2
Mu (ft-k)
-4.2
150.6
137.3
102.3
56.4
74.6
50.3
25.4
Vu (kips)
5.6
-44.0
-52.3
-52.7
-3.6
-4.6
-3.3
-1.8
DESIGN FLEXURE
Location
Top Longitudinal
Bottom Longitudinal
Bottom Transverse
Mu,max
-4.2 ft-k
254.9 ft-k
1
ft-k / ft
d (in)
9.69
8.69
8.38
min
reqD
max
smax
0.0001 0.0001 0.0129 no limit
0.0025 0.0041 0.0129
18
0.0004 0.0003 0.0129
18
use
1#5
23 # 5 @ 8 in o.c.
6 # 5 @ 15 in o.c.
provD
0.0002
0.0043
0.0026
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR

Direction
Vc = 2 b d (fc')0.5
Vu,max
Longitudinal
Transverse
75.2
4.3
k
k / ft
125
8
check Vu < Vc
k
k / ft
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
v u ( psi ) =
3
d b1
J =
R=
P u R 0.5 v M u b1
+
J
AP
1+
d
b1
2
+3
A P = 2 ( b1 + b 2 ) d
v = 1
b2
b1
where
2
3
y = MIN 2,
b1
b2
b0 =
A f = BL
P u b1b2
Af
Case
1
2
3
1+
Pu
67.2
65.5
46.0
Mu
168.0
178.8
130.0
b1
18.9
18.9
18.9
0.75
b2
18.9
18.9
18.9
b0
0.5
0.5
0.5
v
0.4
0.4
0.4
(ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )
c
1.0
1.0
1.0
f 'c
v c( psi ) = ( 2 + y )
y
2.0
2.0
2.0
, 40
d
b0
AP
, b1 = ( 0.5c1 + 0.5b1 + d ) , b 2 = ( 0.5c 2 + 0.5b 2 + d )
d
Af
112.0
112.0
112.0
Ap
4.4
4.4
4.4
R
1.5
1.4
1.0
J
1.9
1.9
1.9
vu (psi)
105.3
102.7
72.2
vc
150.0
150.0
150.0
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Footing Design of Shear Wall Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
Lw =
30.5
ft
WALL HIGHT
h =
42
ft
WALL THICKNESS
t =
12
in
FOOTING LENGTH
L =
38.5
ft
L1 =
ft
B =
10
ft
T=
24
in
D =
ft
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE
qa =
2.5
ksf
WALL LENGTH
FOOTING WIDTH
FOOTING THICHNESS
DEAD LOAD AT TOP WALL
Pr,DL =
54.115
kips
LIVE LOAD AT TOP WALL
Pr,LL =
54.115
kips
TOP LOAD LOCATION

WALL SELF WEIGHT
a =
Pw =
26.04
LATERAL LOAD TYPE (0=wind,1=seismic)
ft
kips
seismic
SEISMIC LOAD (E/1.4 , ASD)
F =
43.21
kips
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc' =
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy =
60
ksi
TOP BARS, LONGITUDINAL
BOTTOM BARS, LONGITUDINAL
11
10
12
BOTTOM BARS, TRANSVERSE
in o.c.
ANALYSIS
F = MR / MO =
Where
1.53
Pf =
111.65
MO = F (h + D) =
>
1.0 / 0.9
for seismic
[Satisfactory]
kips (footing self weight)

1944
ft-kips (overturning moment)
MR = (Pr,DL) (L1 + a) + Pf (0.5 L) + Pw (L1 + 0.5Lw) =
2975
ft-kips (resisting moment without live load)
CHECK SOIL CAPACITY (ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN)

Ps =
77
kips (soil weight in footing size)
P = (Pr,DL + Pr,LL) + Pw + (Pf - Ps) =
168.92
kips (total vertical net load)
MR = (Pr,DL + Pr, LL) (L1 + a) + Pf (0.5 L) + Pw (L1 + 0.5Lw) =

e = 0.5 L - (MR - MO) / P =
11.23
3300
ft-kips (resisting moment with live load)
ft (eccentricity from middle of footing)
6e
L
L
, for e
6
BL
L
2P
, for e >
3B(0.5L e )
6
P 1+
q MAX =
1.40
ksf
<
4 / 3 qa
[Satisfactory]
Where
e=
11.23
ft, > (L / 6)
CHECK FOOTING CAPACITY (STRENGTH DESIGN)

Mu,R =
1.2 [Pr,DL (L1 + a) + Pf (0.5 L) + Pw (L1 + 0.5Lw)] + 0.5 Pr, LL(L1 + a) =
Mu,o =
1.4 F(h + D) =
Pu =
1.2 (Pr,DL + Pf + Pw ) + 0.5 Pr, LL =
eu = 0.5L - (Mu,R - Mu,O) / Pu =
q u ,MAX =
2722
15.32
3733
ft-kips
ft-kips
257
kips
ft
6e u
Pu 1 +
L
L
, for e u
BL
6
2Pu
L
, for e u >
3B(0.5L e u)
6
4.37
ksf
2.5
(cont'd)
BENDING MOMENT & SHEAR AT EACH FOOTING SECTION
Section
1/10 L
2/10 L
3/10 L
4/10 L
5/10 L
6/10 L
7/10 L
8/10 L
9/10 L
Xu (ft)
3.85
7.70
11.55
15.40
19.25
23.10
26.95
30.80
34.65
38.50
Pu,w (klf)
0.0
0.0
23.3
16.9
10.5
4.0
-2.4
-8.8
-15.2
0.0
0.0
Mu,w (ft-k)
-188
-720
-1503
-2440
-3438
-4400
-5232
-5839
-6314
-123
Vu,w (kips)
-98
-175
-228
-255
-259
-237
-191
-123
Pu,f (ksf)
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Mu,f (ft-k)
-26
-103
-232
-413
-645
-928
-1264
-1651
-2089
-2579
Vu,f (kips)
-13
-27
-40
-54
-67
-80
-94
-107
-121
-134
qu (ksf)
-4.4
-2.9
-1.5
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Mu,q (ft-k)
288
1012
1961
2951
3941
4931
5922
6912
7902
8893
Vu,q (kips)
141
226
257
257
257
257
257
257
257
257
Mu (ft-k)
263
722
1008
1035
856
565
258
29
-26
Vu (kips)
127
102
42
-24
-65
-82
-74
-41
13
1500
1000
500
M
0
-500
200
100
V
0
-100
d (in)
reqD
provD
Vu,max
-26
ft-k
20.69
0.0001
0.0004
127
kips
231
Bottom Longitudinal
1035
ft-k
20.37
0.0049
0.0057
127
kips
228
kips
Bottom Transverse
ft-k / ft
19.36
0.0018
0.0019
kips / ft
22
kips / ft
Mu,max
Location
Top Longitudinal
0.85 f 'c 1 1
Where
MAX =
f
0.85 1 f c'
fy
Mu
0.383b d 2 f 'c
min
Vc = 2 b d (fc')0.5
0.0018
u +t
0.0155
[Satisfactory]
kips
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Combined Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
c1
c2
COLUMN WIDTH
COL#1
COL#2
18
18
in
18
13
18
26
in
k
k
COLUMN DEPTH
AXIAL DEAD LOAD
PDL
=
=
AXIAL LIVE LOAD
PLL
6.25
12.5
1
-300
Seismic SD
300
k

SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD, SD
PLAT
=
=
SEISMIC SHEAR LOAD, SD
VLAT
84.14
86.38
SEISMIC MOMENT, SD
MLAT
4.578
4.578
k-ft
fc'
ksi
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fy
60
ksi
Qa
ksf
DISTANCE TO LEFT EDGE
L1
36
ft
DISTANCE BETWEEN COLUMNS
30
ft
DISTANCE TO RIGHT EDGE
S
L2
36
ft
FOOTING WIDTH
7.5
ft
Df
ft
48
in
SURCHARGE
qs
0.1
ksf
SOIL WEIGHT
ws
0.11
kcf
BAND WIDTH
be =
LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING BAR SIZE
10
LONG. REINF AT TOP
10 # 10 @ 9 in o.c., cont.
TRANSVERSE REINFORCING BAR SIZE
LONG. REINF AT BOTTOM
13 # 10 @ 7 in o.c., cont.
TRANS. REINF. AT BAND WIDTH
7 # 5 @ 14 in o.c., bottom
REBAR YIELD STRESS

FTG EMBEDMENT DEPTH

FOOTING THICKNESS
7.5
ft
DESIGN SUMMARY
FOOTING LENGTH
FOOTING WIDTH
FOOTING THICKNESS
B
T
=
=
102.00 ft
7.50
48
ft
in
ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS (IBC SEC.1605.3.2 & ACI 318 SEC.9.2.1)
SERVICE LOADS
COL # 1
CASE 1 : DL + LL
19
COL # 2
k
39
TOTAL
k
58
(e
CASE 2 : DL + LL + E / 1.4
-195
3.3
5.00
k
ft, fr CL ftg )
253
58
ft-k
3.3
ft-k
6.5
ft-k
(e
CASE 3 : 0.9 DL + E / 1.4
116.43 ft, fr CL ftg )
60
62
122
-203
238
35
3.3
ft-k
3.3
ft-k
6.5
ft-k
(e
V
60
62
Pu
26
51

122
77
5.00
k
ft, fr CL ftg )
FACTORED LOADS
CASE 1 : 1.2 DL + 1.6 LL
CASE 2 : 1.2 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 E
CASE 3 : 0.9 DL + 1.0 E
Psoil =
MR =
(0.15 kcf) T B L =
ws (Df - T) B L =
Pu
-278
344
4.6
ft-k
4.6
ft-k
Vu
84
86
171
Pu
-288
323
35
Mu
4.6
ft-k
4.6
ft-k
Vu
84
86
459.00
k, footing weight
84.15
k, soil weight
PDL 1(L - L1) + PDL 2L2 + 0.5 (Pftg + Psoil) L =
29495
Mu

MR / MO =
>
2.99081
F = 1 / (0.9x1.4)
[Satisfactory]
MLAT 1 + MLAT 2 + (VLAT 1 + VLAT 2) Df - PLAT 1(L - L1) - PLAT 2L2 =
Where MO =
Pftg =
( eu
k-ft
9862
k-ft
66
( eu
( eu
9.2
ft-k
9.2
ft-k
171
(cont'd)
CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318 SEC.15.2.2)
Service Loads
CASE 1
CASE 2
57.8
57.8
CASE 3
35.1
e
qs B L
5.0
76.5
116.4
76.5
188.3
0.0
ft
k, (surcharge load)
(0.15-ws)T B L
122.4
122.4
110.2
256.7
256.7
145.3
e
qmax
1.1
0.4
qallow
2.0
Where
( P )
q MAX =
1+
< L/6
26.2
0.9
> L/6
45.5
2.4
2.7
6e
L
k
> L/6
ft
ksf
2.7
ksf
[Satisfactory]
BL
2 ( P )
,
3 B(0.5 L e )
L
6
L
e>
6
e
for
for

(ACI 318 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, 12.5, 15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)
( Pu )
qu,MAX =
1+
6eu
L
BL
2 ( Pu )
3B(0.5L eu)
, for eu
'
L
6
MAX =
L
, for eu >
6
0.85 1 f c
fy
'
T 4
MIN = MIN 0.0018 ,
d 3
0.85 f c 1 1
u
u +t
Mu
0.383bd 2 f 'c
fy
FACTORED SOIL PRESSURE

Factored Loads
Pu
CASE 1
76.8
CASE 2
65.6
CASE 3
35.1
eu
5.0
142.4
261.7
qs B L
130.1
76.5
0.0
[0.15 T + ws (Df - T)] B L
760.4
651.8
488.8
967.3
793.8
523.9
Pu
eu
0.4
qu, max
< L/6
11.8
1.294
< L/6
1.756
k, (factored footing & backfill loads)

k
> L/6
ft
1.391

0.5 L1
L1 left
L1 right
0
0.2 S
0.4 S
Section
0
18.00
36.00
36.00
42.00
48.00
Xu (ft)
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
17.5
k
ft
k, (factored surcharge load)
ksf
0.6 S
54.00
0.8 S
60.00
L2 left
66.00
L2 right
66.00
0.5 L2
84.00
L
102.00
-3,533
Mu,col (ft-k)
-154
-307
-461
-614
-768
-768
-2,150
Vu,col (k)
0.0
0.0
25.6
25.6
25.6
25.6
25.6
25.6
76.8
76.8
76.8
Pu,surch (klf)
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
Mu,surch (ft-k)
-207
-826
-826
-1125
-1469
-1859
-2295
-2777
-2777
-4498
-6633
Vu,surch (k)
23.0
45.9
45.9
53.6
61.2
68.9
76.5
84.2
84.2
107.1
130.1
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
7.455
-1208
-4831
-4831
-6575
-8588
-10869
-13419
-16237
-16237
-26301
-38781
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
134.2
268.4
268.4
313.1
357.8
402.6
447.3
492.0
492.0
626.2
760.4
qu,soil (ksf)
1.23
1.25
1.26
1.26
1.26
1.26
1.27
1.27
1.27
1.27
1.28
1.29
Mu,soil (ft-k)
1505
6035
6035
8222
10749
13617
16827
20380
20380
33103
48946
Vu,soil (k)
-167.4
-336.2
-336.2
-392.8
-449.6
-506.5
-563.5
-620.7
-620.7
-793.3
-967.3
M u (ft-k)
Vu (kips)
90
378
378
369
385
428
499
598
598
154
-10.3
-21.9
3.7
-0.6
-4.9
-9.4
-14.1
-18.9
32.3
16.8
1.28
40
20
0
-20
-40
(cont'd)
0.5 L1
L1 left
L1 right
0
0.2 S
0.4 S
Section
0
18.00
36.00
36.00
42.00
48.00
Xu (ft)
0.6 S
54.00
0.8 S
60.00
L2 left
L2 right
0.5 L2
66.00
66.00
84.00
L
102.00
5,994
Mu,col (ft-k)
1,673
3,342
5,011
6,680
8,349
8,345
7,174
Vu,col (k)
0.0
0.0
-278.2
-278.2
-278.2
-278.2
-278.2
-278.2
65.6
65.6
65.6
Pu,surch (klf)
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
Mu,surch (ft-k)
-122
-486
-486
-662
-864
-1094
-1350
-1634
-1634
-2646
-3902
Vu,surch (k)
13.5
27.0
27.0
31.5
36.0
40.5
45.0
49.5
49.5
63.0
76.5
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
6.39
-1035
-4141
-4141
-5636
-7361
-9317
-11502
-13917
-13917
-22544
-33241
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
115.0
230.0
230.0
268.4
306.7
345.1
383.4
421.7
421.7
536.8
651.8
qu,soil (ksf)
0.32
0.57
0.83
0.83
0.91
1.00
1.08
1.16
1.25
1.25
1.50
1.76
Mu,soil (ft-k)
491
2375
2375
3419
4709
6267
8117
10282
10282
18890
31148
Vu,soil (k)
-60.3
-154.7
-154.7
-193.8
-236.7
-283.4
-333.9
-388.2
-388.2
-573.9
-793.8
M u (ft-k)
Vu (kips)
-666
-2252
-2247
-1205
-174
868
1946
3080
3076
874
68.3
102.3
-175.9
-172.1
-172.2
-176.0
-183.7
-195.1
148.6
91.4
0.75
6.39
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000
-2000
-3000
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300

0.5 L1
L1 left
L1 right
0
Section
0.2 S
0.4 S
Xu (ft)
0
18.00
36.00
36.00
42.00
48.00
0.6 S
54.00
0.8 S
60.00
L2 left
66.00
L2 right
66.00
0.5 L2
84.00
L
102.00
7,395
Mu,col (ft-k)
1734
3464
5194
6924
8654
8,649
8,026
Vu,col (k)
0.0
0.0
-288.3
-288.3
-288.3
-288.3
-288.3
-288.3
35.1
35.1
35.1
Pu,surch (klf)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mu,surch (ft-k)
Vu,surch (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
4.79
-776
-3106
-3106
-4227
-5521
-6987
-8627
-10438
-10438
-16908
-24931
488.8
0.00
4.79
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
86.3
172.5
172.5
201.3
230.0
258.8
287.6
316.3
316.3
402.6
qu,soil (ksf)
0.00
0.23
0.48
0.48
0.56
0.64
0.73
0.81
0.89
0.89
1.14
1.39
Mu,soil (ft-k)
77
706
706
1143
1732
2494
3452
4629
4629
9695
17536
Vu,soil (k)
-14.0
-61.5
-61.5
-84.9
-111.9
-142.7
-177.3
-215.6
-215.6
-352.9
-523.9
M u (ft-k)
Vu (kips)
-700
-2400
-2395
-1350
-325
700
1749
2844
2840
813
72.3
111.0
-177.3
-171.9
-170.2
-172.2
-178.0
-187.6
135.8
84.7
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000
-2000
-3000
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
DESIGN FLEXURE
Location
Mu,max
d (in)
min
reqD
max
smax(in)
use
provD
Top Longitudinal
-2400
ft-k
45.37
0.0019
0.0030
0.0155
no limit
10 # 10 @ 9 in o.c., cont.
0.0031
Bottom Longitudinal
3080
ft-k
44.37
0.0019
0.0041
0.0155
18
13 # 10 @ 7 in o.c., cont.
0.0041
ft-k / ft
43.42
0.0006
6.9E-06
0.0155
18
7 # 5 @ 14 in o.c.
0.0006
Bottom Transverse, be
[Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR
Vc = 2 b d (fc')
Vu,max
Direction
Longitudinal
195
Transverse
0.5
check Vu < Vc
328
[Satisfactory]
k / ft
43
k / ft
[Satisfactory]
CHECK PUNCHING SHEAR (ACI 318 SEC.15.5.2, 11.12.1.2, 11.12.6, & 13.5.3.2)
P u R 0.5 v M ub1
+
J
AP
2
3
d b1
d
b
J=
1+
+3 2
6
b1
b1
A P = 2 ( b1 + b 2 ) d
v u ( psi) =
R=
v = 1
Col. 1
Col. 2
2
3
y = MIN 2,
b1
b2
A f = Bb e
P ub1b2
Af
Column
1+
'
fc
vc( psi ) = ( 2 + y )
b0 =
, 40
d
b0
AP
, b1 = ( c1 + d ) , b 2 = ( c2 + d )
d
Case
Pu
Mu
b1
b2
Af
Ap
vu (psi)
vc
25.6
0.0
61.4
61.4
0.4
1.0
2.0
56.3
74.1
11.9
363.8
1.3
164.3
0.0
0.0
61.4
61.4
0.4
1.0
2.0
56.3
74.1
0.0
363.8
0.0
164.3
0.0
0.0
61.4
61.4
0.4
1.0
2.0
56.3
74.1
0.0
363.8
0.0
164.3
51.2
0.0
61.4
61.4
0.4
1.0
2.0
56.3
74.1
23.8
363.8
2.6
164.3
343.7
4.6
61.4
61.4
0.4
1.0
2.0
56.3
74.1
160.1
363.8
17.3
164.3
323.4
4.6
61.4
61.4
0.4
1.0
2.0
56.3
74.1
150.6
363.8
16.3
164.3
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Combined Footing, Based on ACI 318-02

DESIGN SUMMARY
CONCRETE STRENGTH
f c' =
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS

FOOTING WIDTH
FOOTING THICKNESS
fy
W
D
L
60
90
48
30
ksi
in
in
ft
=
=
=
=
COMBINED FOOTING LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING

TOP
12
#
10
( d = 43.74 in )
( 1 Layer)
BOTTOM
13
#
10
( d = 43.74 in )
( 1 Layer)
7.5
COMBINED FOOTING HOOPS (ACI 21.3.3)

LOCATION
AT END
LENGTH
96
in
AT SPLICE
70
in
MAX{0.075fydb/[(fc')0.5(c+Ktr)/db], 12}
7 Legs # 5
@ 4 in o.c.
( 2h )
7 Legs # 5
@ 10 in o.c.
BAR
SPACING
MIN(d/4, 8db, 24dt, 12)
MIN(d/4, 4)
THE SEISMIC DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK GB SECTION REQUIREMENTS (ACI 21.3.1)
Ln=L - c1 =
28.50
W /D=
W =
1.88
90
>
ft
>
0.3
>
<
in
4d=
14.58
[Satisfactory]
10
in
c1+1.5D =
90
ft
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
in
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SEISMIC FLEXURAL REQUIREMENTS

(ACI 21.3.2.1)
(ACI 21.3.2.2)
top =
0.004
bot =
0.004
>
Mn,top
where
>
<
>
min=MIN[3(fc')0.5/fy, 200/fy ]= 0.003

max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
<
max =
(1/2)Mn,bot
0.025
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
Mn,bot = bot bd2fy (1 - 0.588bot fy/fc') =
3433
ft-kips
Mn,top = top bd fy (1 - 0.588top fy/fc') =
3181
ft-kips
CHECK GB SHEAR STRENGTH (ACI 21.3.4)

Ve = (Mpr, top + Mpr,bot) / Ln =
where
286.5
kips
<
8(fc')0.5bd =
<
[2(fc')0.5bd + Avfyd/s ] =
Mpr,top = top bd fy (1.25 - 0.919top fy/fc') =
3929
ft-kips
Mpr,bot = bot bd2fy (1.25 - 0.919bot fy/fc') =

=
0.75
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
in2
Av =
2.17
4235
ft-kips
1293.7
kips
[Satisfactory]
750.5
kips
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Grade Beam Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc' =
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS

SQUIRE PAD SIZE
COLUMN DISTANCE
fy
B
T
W
D
L
=
=
=
=
=
=
60
8
16
36
36
22
ksi
ft
in
in
in
ft
GRADE BEAM EXTENSION
Le =
ft
GRADE BEAM SIZE
PD,1 =
25
kips
PD,2 =
25
kips
PL,1 =
15
kips
PL,2 =
15
kips
(Live Load)
PE,1 =
-30
kips
PE,2 =
30
kips
(Seismic Load)
SEISMIC SHEAR LOADS, ASD
VE,1 =
50
kips
VE,2 =
30
kips
(Seismic Load)
SEISMIC MOMENTS, ASD
ME,1 =
50
ft-kips
ME,2 =
50
ft-kips
(Seismic Load)
@ 12 o.c., Each Way, Bottom.
FRAME AXIAL LOADS, ASD
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE

PAD REINFORCING
Qa =
8
2.5
#
(Dead Load)
ksf
GRADE BEAM LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING

TOP
7
#
7
( d = 31.94 in )
( 1 Layer)
BOTTOM
7
#
7
( d = 31.94 in )
( 1 Layer)
GRADE BEAM HOOPS (ACI 21.3.3)
LOCATION
AT END
LENGTH
72
in
-30
AT SPLICE
48
in
( 2h )
4 Legs # 5
4 Legs # 5
(Legs to alternate long bars supported, ACI 7.10.5.3)
@ 7 in o.c.
@ 4 in o.c.
BAR
SPACING
MIN(d/4, 8db, 24dt, 12)
MIN(d/4, 4)
THE GRADE BEAM DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK OVERTURNING AT CENTER BOTTOM OF PAD 2
MO =
ME,1 + ME,2 + (VE,1+VE,2)(D+T) - PE,1L
MR =
(PD,1 + conc B T) L + 0.5conc(L + 2Le) L D W =
1106.7 ft-kips
1306.8
>
MO / 0.9 =
1230
ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
<
4/3 Qa
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
Q MAX =
where
M O + P D ,2 + P L ,2 + ( CONC SOIL ) B T + WD ( 0.5 L + L e ) =

2
2
BL
B
2
conc =
0.15 kcf
soil =
0.11 kcf
1.55
CHECK PAD FLEXURAL REINFORCING
0.85 f c' 1 1
f
where
d=
Mu
0.383Bd 2 f c'
0.0020
12.25
Qu,max = 1.5 Qmax =
<
provd =
0.0030
in
2.33
ksf, factor 1.5 for SD
Mu = 0.125 (B-W)2 B Qu,max =
max =
0.0155
(ACI 10.2.7.3 & 10.3.5)
min =
0.0018
(ACI 7.12.2.1)
128
ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
ksf, (net pressure)
(cont'd)
CHECK PAD ONE WAY SHEAR CAPACITY
<
Vu
where
Vn
[Satisfactory]
Vu = 0.5 (B - W) B Qu,max - d B Qu,max =

0.5
Vn = 2 d B (fc')
=
0.75
96.6
27.6
kips
kips

Pu = 1.5(VE,1 - VE,2) =
Ln=L - B =
14.00
W /D=
1.00
W =
36
30
<
0.1Agfc' =
4d=
10.65
kips
>
ft
>
0.3
388.8
ft
kips
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
>
<
B+1.5D =
0.004
>
min=MIN[3(fc')0.5/fy, 200/fy ]=
<
max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
in
10
in
[Satisfactory]
150
in
[Satisfactory]
CHECK GB FLEXURAL REQUIREMENTS
top =
(ACI 21.3.2.1)
(ACI 21.3.2.2)
0.003
bot =
0.004
>
min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
<
max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
Mn,top
>
(1/2)Mn,bot
where
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
642
ft-kips
>
Mu,bot / [Satisfactory]
Mn,top = top bd2fy (1 - 0.588top fy/fc') =

=
0.9
642
ft-kips
>
Mu,top / [Satisfactory]
2
M u ,top = 1.5 M GB, wt + ( P D,1 + P L,1 + P E ,1 + Wt PAD ,1 Q MIN B ) L 0.5V E ,1D M E ,1 Q MIN (V E ,1 + V E ,2 ) / ( Q MAX + Q MIN ) ( 0.5D + T ) =
453
ft-kips
2
M u ,bot = 1.5 M GB, wt ( P D,2 + P L,2 + P E ,2 + Wt PAD,1 Q MAX B ) L 0.5V E ,2D M E ,2 Q MAX (V E ,1 + V E ,2 ) / ( Q MAX + Q MIN ) ( 0.5D + T ) =
217
ft-kips
where
Q MAX =
QMIN =
M O P D ,2 + P L ,2 + CONC B T + WD ( 0.5L + L e )
+
=
2
2
BL
B
2
0.38
1.95
ksf, (full ASD pressure)
377.8
kips
[Satisfactory]
349.0
kips
Factor 1.5 is for SD

where
113.3
kips
<
8(fc')0.5bd =
<
[2(fc')0.5bd + Avfyd/s ] =
Mpr,top = top bd2fy (1.25 - 0.919top fy/fc') =
793
ft-kips

=
0.75
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
793
ft-kips
Av =
1.24
in2
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Retaining Wall Design Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa=ka b
BACKFILL SPECIFIC WEIGHT
b
SATURATED SPECIFIC WEIGHT
sat
WATER TABLE
h
PASSIVE PRESSURE
Pp
SURCHARGE WEIGHT
ws
FRICTION COEFFICIENT
Qa
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
tt
THICKNESS OF TOP STEM
tb
THICKNESS OF KEY & STEM
LT
TOE WIDTH
LH
HEEL WIDTH
HT
HEIGHT OF TOP STEM
HB
HEIGHT OF BOT. STEM
hf
FOOTING THICKNESS
hk
KEY DEPTH
hp
SOIL OVER TOE
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
TOP STEM REINF. (As,1)
#
As,1 LOCATION (0=at soil face, 1=at middle)
#
BOT. STEM REINF. (As,2)
As,2 LOCATION (0=at soil face, 1=at middle)
TOP REINF.OF FOOTING (As,3)
#
BOT. REINF.OF FOOTING (As,4)
#
3
60
30
100
118
6
450
200
0.3
3
8
12
3
6
4
4
12
12
12
6
0
7
0
6
5
ksi
ksi
pcf (equivalent fluid pressure)
pcf
pcf
ft
psf / ft
psf
ksf
in
in
ft
ft
ft
ft
in
in
in
@
at soil face
@
at soil face
@
@
20
in o.c., (Caution > 18"o.c. max. ACI 14.3.5)
in o.c.
20
14
in o.c., (Caution > 18"o.c. max. ACI 7.12.2.2)

in
[THE WALL DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
SERVICE LOADS
2
2
Hb = 0.5 Pa h + h Pa H + 0.5 [Pa (sat - w) / b +w] H
=
Where
h = 6 ft ,
Hs = ws Pa (HT + HB + hf) / b
2
Hp = 0.5 Pp (hp + hf + hk)
Ws = ws (LH + tb - tt)
Wb = Wb1 + Wb2
Where Wb1 = 3.73 kips ,
Wf = hf (LH + tb + LT) c
Wk = hk tb c
Ww,t = tt HT c
Ww,b = tb HB c
FACTORED LOADS
Hb = 1.6 Hb
Hs = 1.6 Hs
Ws = 1.6 Ws
Wb = 1.2 Wb
Wf = 1.2 Wf
Wk = 1.2 Wk
Ww,t = 1.2 Ww,t
Ww,b = 1.2 Ww,b
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
H=
=
=
=
=
Wb2 =
=
=
=
=
1.44
3
0.54
2.03
1.27
4.40
0.67
1.50
0.15
0.40
0.60
2.30 kips
0.86 kips
2.03 kips
kips
ft
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
12
OVERTURNING MOMENT
5.28 kips
1.80
0.18
0.48
0.72
Hb
Hs
kips
kips
kips
kips
Hy
H y
1.44
0.54
1.98
2.30
0.86
3.16
2.69
4.50
3.87
2.43
6.30
6.19
3.89
10.07
RESISTING MOMENT
Ws
Wb
Wf
Wk
Ww,t
Ww,b
Wx
W x
1.27
4.40
1.50
0.15
0.40
0.60
8.32
2.03
5.28
1.80
0.18
0.48
0.72
10.49
6.83
6.90
5.00
3.50
3.33
3.50
8.66
30.38
7.50
0.53
1.33
2.10
50.50
13.85
36.46
9.00
0.63
1.60
2.52
64.06
OVERTURNING FACTOR OF SAFETY
SF =
Wx
=
Hy
8.02
>
1.5
[Satisfactory]
L = LT + t b + L H
W 1 +
q MAX =
10.00
e=
ft
L Wx Hy
2
W
-0.31
ft
6e
L
L
, for e
6
BL
L
W
, for e >
3B(0.5L e )
6
0.67
ksf
<
Qa
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,1 & AS,2, FOR STEM (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)
h=
6
ft ,
H' =
2 ft
A = ws Pa / b =
60
plf
B = h Pa =
180 plf
C = [Pa (sat - w) / b + w] H' =158
At base of top stem
Mu =
1.28
Vu =
0.77
Pu =
0.48
plf
ft-kips
kips
kips
At base of bottom stem

Mu =
7.27 ft-kips
Vu =
2.46 kips
Pu =
1.20 kips
At top stem
M n = AS f
AS f y P u
d
1.7bf c'
where
0.85 1 f c
'
MAX =
f y
d
b
As
u
u +t
MIN = 0.0018
t
d
=
=
=
=
=
=
3.98
>
ft-kips ,
Mu
[Satisfactory]
4.56 in ,
12
in ,
0.7
,
2
0.264 in ,
0.005
0.015
>
0.003
<
24.25
8.56
12
0.7
0.9
0.009
ft-kips
>
Mu
[Satisfactory]
in
in
in2
0.015
[Satisfactory]
>
[Satisfactory]
0.002
[Satisfactory]
<
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY FOR STEM (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)
V allowable = 2 bd
'
c
At top stem
4.50 kips ,
>

8.44
kips
Vu
>
[Satisfactory]
Vu
[Satisfactory]
where = 0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

CHECK HEEL FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,3, FOR FOOTING (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.3.5, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)
0.85 1 f c
'
MAX =
f y
u +t
0.015
MIN =
0.0018 h f
2
d
0.001
( q u ,3 + 2q u, heel ) b L H , for L
L H + + LH
ws
wb
wf
eu
2
6
6
L
2
M u ,3 =
q u ,3b S 2
L
L H + + LH
, for eu >
ws
wb
wf
2
6
6
L
0.85 f c' 1 1
f
where
d
eu
S
( A S, 3 ) required
M u ,3
'
0.383b d 2 f c
0.002
qu, toe
qu, heel
qu, 3
=
=
=
7.21 ft-kips
=
=
=
8.63 in
-0.15 ft
n/a
2
in / ft
0.19
A S, 3
<
0.96
1.14
0.71
ksf
ksf
ksf
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TOE FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,4, FOR FOOTING (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.3.5, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)
0.85 1 f c
'
MAX =
M u ,4 =
(q
u ,4
f y
+ 2q u ,toe ) b LT2
6
u
u +t
0.015
MIN = MIN
4
0.0018 h f
,
3
2
d
LT w f
2L
3.21
ft-kips
where
0.85 f c' 1 1
( A S, 4 ) required
M u ,4
'
0.383b d 2 f c
d
qu, 4
=
=
8.69
0.77
in
ksf
0.001
0.11
in2 / ft
<
A S, 4
[Satisfactory]
CHECK KEY CAPACITY FOR FOOTING

1.5 (Hb + Hs ) =
2.96 kips
Hp + W =
<
[Satisfactory]
4.52
kips
Techincal References:
1. Alan Williams: "Structuiral Engineering Reference Manual", Professional Publications, Inc, 2001.
2. Alan Williams: "Structuiral Engineering License Review Problems and Solutions", Oxford University Press, 2003.
0.001
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Retaining Wall Design Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
REBAR YIELD STRESS
LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE
PASSIVE PRESSURE
SURCHARGE WEIGHT
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
TOE WIDTH
HEEL WIDTH
HEIGHT OF TOP STEM
HEIGHT OF BOT. STEM
FOOTING THICKNESS
KEY DEPTH
SOIL OVER TOE
fc'
fy
Pa
Pp
ws
Qa
tt
tb
LT
LH
HT
HB
hf
hk
hp
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
#
#
#
#
1
2
3
60
30
450
200
0.3
3
8
12
3
6
6.5
6.3
12
12
12
6
7
6
5
ksi
ksi
psf / ft
psf
ksf
in
in
ft
ft
ft
ft
in
in
in
@
@
@
@
16
8
10
14
in o.c., at middle
in o.c., at each face
in
in
[THE WALL DESIGN IS INADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
SERVICE LOADS
Hb = 0.5 Pa (HT + HB + hf)2
Hp = 0.5 Pp (hp + hf + hk)2
Wb = [HT (LH + tb - tt) + HB LH] b
Wk = hk tb c
Ww,t = tt HT c
Ww,b = tb HB c
FACTORED LOADS
Hb = 1.6 Hb
Hs = 1.6 Hs
Ws = 1.6 Ws
Wb = 1.2 Wb
Wf = 1.2 Wf
Wk = 1.2 Wk
Ww,t = 1.2 Ww,t
Ww,b = 1.2 Ww,b
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2.86
0.83
2.03
1.27
7.90
1.50
0.15
0.65
0.95
4.57 kips
1.32 kips
2.03 kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
OVERTURNING MOMENT
9.48 kips
1.80
0.18
0.78
1.13
Hb
Hs
kips
kips
kips
kips
Hy
H y
2.86
0.83
3.68
4.57
1.32
5.90
4.60
6.90
13.14
5.71
18.85
21.02
9.14
30.17
RESISTING MOMENT
Ws
Wb
Wf
Wk
Ww,t
Ww,b
Wx
W x
1.27
7.90
1.50
0.15
0.65
0.95
12.41
2.03
9.48
1.80
0.18
0.78
1.13
15.40
6.83
6.91
5.00
3.50
3.33
3.50
8.66
54.59
7.50
0.53
2.17
3.31
76.75
13.85
65.51
9.00
0.63
2.60
3.97
95.56
SF =
Wx
=
Hy
4.07
> 1.5
[Satisfactory]
L = LT + t b + L H
6e
L
W 1 +
q MAX
10.00
e=
ft
L
=
6
BL
L
W
, for e >
3B(0.5L e )
6
, for e
1.49
ksf
L Wx Hy
2
W
<
Qa
0.33
ft
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,1 & AS,2, FOR STEM (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.3.5, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)
Mu =
P a y + Pa y w s
6
2 b
Pu = W w
M n = AS f
AS f y P u
1.7bf 'c
where
MAX =
0.85 1 f c'
f y
MIN = 0.0018
d
b
As
0.78
4.26
>
=
=
=
=
=
=
u +t
t
d
At top stem
4.23 ft-kips ,

24.64 ft-kips
kips ,
1.91
kips
ft-kips ,
Mu
[Satisfactory]
4.00 in ,
12
in ,
0.7
,
2
0.33 in ,
0.007
24.29
ft-kips
<
Mu
[Unsatisfactory]
in
in
0.015
>
0.015
0.004
<
8.56
12
0.7
0.9
0.009
[Satisfactory]
in2
>
[Satisfactory]
0.002
[Satisfactory]
<
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY FOR STEM (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)
2
y
w y
V = Pa + sP a
2
b
V allowable = 2 bd
'
fc
At top stem
1.64 kips ,
3.94
>

5.16
kips
kips ,
8.44
V
[Satisfactory]
kips
>
V
[Satisfactory]
where = 0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

MAX =
0.85 1 f c'
f y
u +t
0.015
MIN =
0.0018 h f
2
d
0.001
L H + + LH
ws
wb
wf
eu
2
6
6
L
2
M u ,3 =
= 18.42 ft-kips
q u ,3b S 2
L
L H + + LH
, for eu >
ws
wb
wf
2
6
6
L
0.85 f 'c 1 1
f
where
d
eu
S
( A S, 3 ) required
M u ,3
0.383b d 2 f 'c
0.005
qu, toe
qu, heel
qu, 3
=
=
=
=
=
=
8.63 in
0.75 ft
n/a
in2 / ft
0.50
A S, 3
<
2.24
0.84
1.53
ksf
ksf
ksf
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TOE FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,4, FOR FOOTING (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)
MAX =
(q
=
M u ,4
u ,4
0.85 1 f c'
f y
+ 2q u ,toe ) b LT2
6
u +t
0.015
MIN = MIN
4
0.0018 h f
,
d
3
2
LT w f
2L
8.46
ft-kips
where
0.85 f c' 1 1
( A S, 4 ) required
M u ,4
0.383b d 2 f 'c
d
qu, 4
=
=
8.69 in
1.71 ksf
0.002
0.22
in2 / ft
<
A S, 4
[Satisfactory]

1.5 (Hb + Hs ) =
5.53 kips
Hp + W =
<
[Satisfactory]
5.75
kips
2. Alan Williams: "Structuiral Engineering License Review Problems and Solutions", Oxford University Press, 2003.
0.001
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Retaining Wall Design Based on CBC 2001 Chapter A

CONCRETE STRENGTH
REBAR YIELD STRESS
PASSIVE PRESSURE
SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING
fc'
=
3
ksi
fy
=
60
ksi
Pa
=
45
Pp
=
300
psf / ft
PE
=
34.3 psf / ft, ASD
(PE only for H > 12 ft, CBC 1611A.6)
SURCHARGE WEIGHT
ws
=
100
psf
=
0.35
Qa
=
3
ksf, (w/o 4/3 increasing)
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
tt
=
20
in
tb
=
20
in
LT
TOE WIDTH
=
4.67 ft
LH
HEEL WIDTH
=
7.5
ft
HT
HEIGHT OF TOP STEM
=
8
ft
HB
=
8
ft
HEIGHT OF BOT. STEM
hf
FOOTING THICKNESS
=
24
in
hk
KEY DEPTH
=
38
in
hp
SOIL OVER TOE
=
6
in
#
10
@
5
in o.c.
As,1 LOCATION ( 1 = at middle, 2 = at soil face)
2
at soil face
#
10
@
5
in o.c.
2
at soil face
As,2 LOCATION ( 1 = at middle, 2 = at soil face)
#
8
@
10
in
#
6
@
18
in
ANALYSIS
SERVICE LOADS
2
Hb = 0.5 Pa (HT + HB + hf)
b = 100 pcf, soil weight
where
Hp = 0.5 Pp (hp + hf + hk)2
HE = 0.5 PE (HT + HB)

Wk = hk tb c
Ww,t = tt HT c
Ww,b = tb HB c
FACTORED LOADS
Hb = 1.7 Hb
Hs = 1.7 Hs
HE = 1.4 HE
Ws = 1.7 Ws
Wb = 1.4 Wb
Wf = 1.4 Wf
Wk = 1.4 Wk
Ww,t = 1.4 Ww,t
Ww,b = 1.4 Ww,b
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
7.29
0.81
kips
kips
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
4.82
4.39
0.75
12.00
4.15
0.79
2.00
2.00
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
12.39 kips
1.38 kips
6.15 kips
OVERTURNING MOMENT
1.28 kips
16.80
5.81
1.11
2.80
2.80
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
Hb
HE
Hs
Hy
H y
7.29
4.39
0.81
12.49
12.39
6.15
1.38
19.92
6.00
12.67
9.00
43.74
55.61
7.29
106.6
74.36
77.86
12.39
164.61
(cont'd)
RESISTING MOMENT
Ws
Wb
Wf
Wk
Ww,t
Ww,b
Wx
W x
0.75
12.00
4.15
0.79
2.00
2.00
21.69
1.28
16.80
5.81
1.11
2.80
2.80
30.59
10.09
10.09
6.92
5.50
5.50
5.50
7.57
121.04
28.72
4.36
11.01
11.01
183.69
12.86
169.46
40.21
6.10
15.41
15.41
259.44
SF =
Wx
=
Hy
1.72
> 1.5
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (CBC 2001 SEC.1915A.2.2)
L = LT + t b + L H
e=
L Wx Hy
2
W
W 1 +
q MAX =
6e
L
,
BL
W
,
3B (0.5 L e)
ft
13.84
L
6
L
for e >
6
for e
3.37
2.04
ft
<
L/4 =
[Satisfactory]
ksf
3.46
4/3 Qa=
<
ft, (CBC 1611A.6)
4.00
ksf
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,1 & AS,2, FOR STEM (CBC 2001 1915A.4.2, 1910A.2, 1910A.5.4, 1907A.12.2, 1912A.2, & 1912A.5)
Mu =
2
3
2
P a y + P a y w s + P E y ( 3H y )
=
6
2 b
6
Pu = W w
M n = AS f
AS f y P u
'
1.7bf c
where
MAX = 0.75
0.85 1 f
87
87 + f
fy
'
c
MIN = 0.0018
t
d
d
b
As
=
=
=
=
=
=
At top stem
29.46 ft-kips ,
2.80

127.58 ft-kips
kips ,
5.60
143.19 ft-kips ,
>
Mu
[Satisfactory]
16.37 in ,
12
in ,
0.7
,
2
3.048 in ,
143.68
0.016
0.016
>
0.002
<
16.37
12
0.7
3.048
0.016
kips
ft-kips
>
Mu
[Satisfactory]
in
in
in
0.016
[Satisfactory]
>
[Satisfactory]
<
[Satisfactory]
0.002
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY FOR STEM (CBC SEC.1915A.5.2, 1911A.1.3.1, & 1911A.3)
2
y w y P y ( 2H y ) =
V = Pa + s Pa + E
2
2
b
V allowable = 2 bd
'
fc
At top stem
7.67 kips ,
18.29
>
where = 0.85 (CBC 2001, Section 1909A.3.2.3 )
kips ,
V
[Satisfactory]

17.16 kips
18.29
kips
>
V
[Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
CHECK HEEL FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,3, FOR FOOTING (CBC 2001 1915A.4.2, 1910A.2, 1910A.5.4, 1907A.12.2, 1912A.2, & 1912A.5)
MAX = 0.75
0.85 1 f 'c 87
87 + f
fy
MIN =
0.016
0.0018 h f
2
d
L H + + LH
ws
wb
wf
eu
2
6
6
L
0.001
M u ,3 =
q u ,3b S 2
L
L H + + LH
, for eu >
ws
wb
wf
2
6
6
L
0.85 f c' 1 1
f
where
d
eu
S
( A S, 3 ) required
M u ,3
0.383b d 2 f 'c
78.06 ft-kips
0.004
7.5
=
=
=
20.50 in
3.82 ft
2.96 ft
qu, toe
qu, heel
qu, 3
2
in / ft
0.88
=
=
=
A S, 3
<
3.29
n/a
1.05
ksf
ksf
ksf
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TOE FLEXURE CAPACITY, AS,4, FOR FOOTING (CBC 2001 1915A.4.2, 1910A.2, 1910A.5.4, 1907A.12.2, 1912A.2, & 1912A.5)
MAX
= 0.75
(q
=
M u ,4
u ,4
0.85 1 f 'c 87
87 + f
fy
+ 2q u ,toe ) b LT2
6
0.016
MIN = MIN
4
0.0018 h f
,
3
2
d
LT w f
2L
25.29
ft-kips
where
0.85 f 'c 1 1
=
( A S, 4 ) required
f
=
M u ,4
0.383b d 2 f 'c
0.001
0.28
in / ft
<
A S, 4
[Satisfactory]

1.5 (Hb + Hs ) =
12.2 kips
Hp + W =
<
[Satisfactory]
12.41
kips
d
qu, 4
=
=
20.63 in
1.638 ksf
0.001
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Retaining Wall Design Based on ACI 530-02 & ACI 318-02

SPECIAL INSPECTION ( 0=NO, 1=YES )
1
Yes
TYPE OF MASONRY ( 1=CMU, 2=BRICK )
1
CMU
=
1.5
ksi
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
=
4.5
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
=
60
ksi
Pa
=
30
=
400
psf / ft
PASSIVE PRESSURE
Pp
=
100
psf
SURCHARGE WEIGHT
ws
=
20
psf
SERVICE LATERAL FORCE
wLat
=
0.3
Qa
=
3
ksf
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
tt
=
8
in
tb
=
12
in
LT
=
3
ft
TOE WIDTH
LH
=
6
ft
HEEL WIDTH
HF
HEIGHT OF FENCE STEM
=
4
ft
HT
=
3.3
ft
HEIGHT OF TOP STEM
HB
=
5.5
ft
HEIGHT OF BOT. STEM
hf
=
12
in
FOOTING THICKNESS
hk
KEY DEPTH
=
12
in
hp
=
12
in
SOIL OVER TOE
#
6
@
16
in o.c.
2
at each face
As,1 LOCATION (0=at soil face, 1=at middle, 2=at each face)
#
7
@
8
in o.c.
As,2 LOCATION (0=at soil face, 1=at middle, 2=at each face)
2
at each face
#
6
@
20
in o.c., (Caution > 18" o.c. max. ACI 7.12.2.2)
#
5
@
14
in
ANALYSIS
SERVICE LOADS
Hb = 0.5 Pa (HT + HB + hf)2
Hp = 0.5 Pp (hp + hf + hk)2
HLat = wLat (HF + HT + HB - hp)
Wk = hk tb c
Ww,t = tt (HT +HF) m
Ww,b = tb HB m
FACTORED LOADS
Hb = 1.6 Hb
Hs = 1.6 Hs
HLat = 1.6 HLat
Ws = 1.6 Ws
Wb = 1.2 Wb
Wf = 1.2 Wf
Wk = 1.2 Wk
Ww,t = 1.2 Ww,t
Ww,b = 1.2 Ww,b
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2.30
0.47
0.38
1.01
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
1.44
0.29
1.80
0.24
0.63
5.39
1.50
0.15
0.54
0.61
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
OVERTURNING MOMENT
6.47 kips
1.80
0.18
0.64
0.73
Hb
Hs
HLat
kips
kips
kips
kips
Hy
H y
1.44
0.29
0.24
1.97
2.30
0.47
0.38
3.15
3.27
4.90
7.90
4.71
1.44
1.86
8.01
7.53
2.30
2.98
12.82
RESISTING MOMENT
Ws
Wb
Wf
Wk
Ww,t
Ww,b
Wx
W x
0.63
5.39
1.50
0.15
0.54
0.61
8.81
1.01
6.47
1.80
0.18
0.64
0.73
10.83
6.83
6.94
5.00
3.50
3.33
3.50
4.33
37.38
7.50
0.53
1.78
2.12
53.64
6.92
44.86
9.00
0.63
2.14
2.54
66.09
SF =
Wx
=
Hy
6.70
>
1.5
[Satisfactory]
L = LT + t b + L H
W 1 +
q MAX
10.00
6e
L
e=
ft
L
6
BL
W
L
, for e >
3B(0.5L e )
6
, for e
0.79
L Wx Hy
2
W
ksf
<
Qa
-0.18
ft
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY FOR MASONRY STEM (ACI 530 2.3.3)

3
y
y ws
M = Pa + Pa
+ M Lat
6
2 b
P =W w
M allowable = MIN
where
0.54
te
d
bw
Fb
Fs
As
M allowable
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
At top stem
7.63 in ,
4.26 in ,
12 in ,
0.495 ksi ,
24 ksi ,
2
0.33 in ,

6.20
ft-kips
kips ,
kd
1
t
P d e
b wkd F b d
2
3
2
Em
Es
n
k
and
At top stem
0.88 ft-kips ,
1.14
, AsF s d
kips
kd
kd
t
+P e
3
2 3

11.63 in
8.19 in
12
in
0.495 ksi
24
ksi
in2
0.9
0.006
,
1350 ksi ,
29000 ksi ,
21.48
0.41
0.009
1350
21.48
0.46
1.55 ft-kips ,
6.25
29000
>
M
[Satisfactory]
>
ksi
ksi
ft-kips
M
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY FOR MASONRY STEM (ACI 530 2.3.5)

2
y
w y
V = P a + s P a + V Lat
2
b
V allow able = d bwMIN
'
m
, 50
At top srem
0.41 kips ,
1.98
>

1.66
kips
kips ,
3.81
kips
V
[Satisfactory]
>
V
[Satisfactory]
0.85 1 f c
'
MAX =
f y
u +t
0.023
MIN =
0.0018 h f
2
d
0.001
L H + + LH
ws
wb
wf
eu
2
6
6
L
2
M u ,3 =
q u ,3b S
L
L H + + LH
, for eu >
ws
wb
wf
L
2
6
6
0.85 f 'c 1 1
f
where
d
eu
S
( A S, 3 ) required
M u ,3
'
0.383b d 2 f c
0.002
qu, toe
qu, heel
qu, 3
=
=
=
8.35 ft-kips
=
=
=
8.63 in
0.08 ft
n/a
in2 / ft
0.22
A S, 3
<
1.14
1.03
0.83
ksf
ksf
ksf
[Satisfactory]
0.85 1 f c
'
MAX =
M u ,4
(q
u ,4
f y
u
u +t
+ 2q u ,toe ) b LT2
6
MIN = MIN
0.023
( A S, 4 ) required
LT w f
2L
3.95
ft-kips
where
0.85 f 'c 1 1
4
0.0018 h f
,
d
3
2
M u ,4
'
0.383b d 2 f c
d
qu, 4
=
=
8.69 in
0.90 ksf
0.001
0.13
in2 / ft
<
A S, 4
[Satisfactory]

1.5 (Hb + Hs + HLat) =
2.96 kips
Hp + W =
<
[Satisfactory]
4.44
kips
1. "Masonry Designers' Guide, Third Edition" (MDG-3), The Masonry Society, 2001.
2. Alan Williams: "Structural Engineering Reference Manual", Professional Publications, Inc, 2001.
3. Alan Williams: "Structural Engineering License Review Problems and Solutions", Oxford University Press, 2003.
0.001
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Restrained Retaining Wall Design Based on ACI 530-02 & ACI 318-02

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
=
Pa
=
=
PASSIVE PRESSURE
Pp
SURCHARGE WEIGHT
ws
=
=
SERVICE LATERAL FORCE
wLat
SERVICE GRAVITY LOAD
P
=
ECCENTRICITY
e
=
=
Qa
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
=
THICKNESS OF STEM
t
=
LT
=
TOE WIDTH
LH
HEEL WIDTH
=
HF
=
HEIGHT OF FENCE STEM
HEIGHT OF STEM
H
=
HR
=
RESTRAINED HEIGHT
hf
FOOTING THICKNESS
=
RESTRAINED BOTTOM ? (1=Yes, 0=No)
hk
KEY DEPTH
=
hp
SOIL OVER TOE
=
1
Yes
1
CMU
1.5
ksi
2.5
ksi
60
ksi
45
350
psf / ft
100
psf
30.1 psf
0.386 kips / ft
6
in
0.35
2.25 ksf
8
in
0.917 ft
0.917 ft
5
ft
7
ft
9
ft
12
in
1
Yes
20
<=No ReqD
[THE WALL DESIGN IS INADEQUATE.]
6
in
#
8
@
8
in o.c.
STEM REINF. (As,1)
As,1 LOCATION (0=at inside face, 1=at middle, 2=at each face)
0
at inside face
#
4
@
24
in
#
4
@
18
in
ANALYSIS
SERVICE LOADS
2
Hb = 0.5 Pa H
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Hs = ws Pa H / b
2
Hp = 0.5 Pp (hp + hf + hk)
HLat = wLat (HF + H - hp)
Ws = ws LH
1.10
0.32
1.75
0.35
0.09
0.64
0.38
0.17
0.88
Wb = H LH b
Wf = hf (LH + t + LT) c
Wk = hk t c
Ww = t ( HF + H ) m
RT = 0.5HLat(HF/HR + hp/HR +H/HR) + Pe/HR
+ 0.5HsH/HR + HbH/3HR
=
0.67
RB = HLat + Hs + Hb - RT
=
1.09
VB = Ww + P
=
1.27
FACTORED LOADS
Hb = 1.6 Hb
= 1.76 kips
Hs = 1.6 Hs
= 0.50 kips
HLat = 1.6 HLat
= 0.55 kips
Ws = 1.6 Ws
= 0.15 kips
Wb = 1.2 Wb
= 0.77 kips
Wf = 1.2 Wf
= 0.45 kips
Wk = 1.2 Wk
Ww = 1.2 Ww
P = 1.6 P
=
=
=
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
kips
1.07
1.75
kips
kips
OVERTURNING MOMENT
0.20 kips
RB
1.06 kips
0.62 kips
=
=
RT = 1.6 RT
RB = 1.6 RB
Hy
H y
1.09
1.09
1.75
1.75
1.00
1.09
1.09
1.75
1.75
RESISTING MOMENT
W
Wx
W x
Ws
Wb
Wf
0.09
0.64
0.38
0.15
0.77
0.45
2.04
2.04
1.25
0.19
1.31
0.47
0.30
1.57
0.56
Wk
0.17
0.20
1.25
0.21
0.25
P
Ww
0.39
0.88
2.54
0.62
1.06
3.24
1.25
1.25
0.48
1.10
3.76
0.77
1.32
4.78
SF =
Wx
=
Hy
3.44
[Satisfactory]
>
1.5
L = LT + t b + L H
W 1 +
e=
ft
2.50
ft
0.20
6e
L
L
, for e
6
BL
L
W
, for e >
3B(0.5L e )
6
q MAX =
L Wx Hy
2
W
=
<
1.51 ksf
Qa
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE CAPACITY FOR MASONRY STEM (ACI 530 2.3.3)

-1
S = Pa { ( PaH + wLat + Hs / H) + [( PaH + wLat + Hs / H) -2Pa(RB +wLat hp)]

P = VB - Ww S / (H + HF)
3.58 ft
1.00 kips, @ Mmax section
0.5
MMax = S RB - 0.5 HS S / H - 0.5 Pa S - Pa (H-S) S /6 - 0.5 wLat (S - hp) =
1
kd
t
P d e
b wkd F b d
M allowable = MIN
2
3
2
where
te
d
bw
Fb
Fs
As
=
=
=
=
=
=
7.63
4.13
12
0.495
24
1.185
in
in
in
ksi
ksi
2
in
=
=
=
=
=
Em
Es
n
k
, As F s
0.024
1350
29000
2.12
ft-kips
kd
kd
t
+P e
d
3
2 3
2.06
<
M
[Unsatisfactory]
ksi
ksi
21.48
0.62
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY FOR MASONRY STEM (ACI 530 2.3.5)
V = Max. Horiz. Shear

V allow able = d bwMIN
'
m
, 50
At restrained stem
0.58 kips ,
1.97
>
At bottom of stem
1.09
kips
kips ,
1.92
kips
V
[Satisfactory]
>
V
[Satisfactory]
MAX =
0.85 1 f c'
f y
u
u +t
MIN =
0.013
0.0018 h f
2
d
L H + + LH
ws
wb
wf
eu
2
6
6
L
M u ,3 =
q u ,3b S 2
L
L H + + LH
, for eu >
ws
wb
wf
2
6
6
L
0.85 f c' 1 1
f
where
d
eu
S
( A S, 3 ) required
M u ,3
'
0.383b d 2 f c
0.000
qu, toe
qu, heel
qu, 3
=
=
=
=
=
=
8.75 in
0.32 ft
n/a
0.13
in / ft
<
A S, 3
2.28
0.31
0.99
ft-kips
ksf
ksf
ksf
[Satisfactory]
0.27 ft-kips
0.001
MAX =
M u ,2 =
(q
u ,4
0.85 1 f c'
f y
u
u +t
+ 2q u ,toe ) b LT2
6
0.013
MIN = MIN
( A S, 2 ) required
LT w f
2L
0.78
ft-kips
where
0.85 f c' 1 1
4
0.0018 h f
,
d
3
2
M u ,2
'
0.383b d 2 f c
d
qu, 2
=
=
8.75 in
1.53 ksf
0.000
0.03
in / ft
<
A S, 2
[Satisfactory]

1.5 RB =
1.64
kips
< Hp + W =
[Satisfactory]
N/A
(Restrained)
3. Alan Williams: "Structural Engineering License Review Problems and Solutions", Oxford University Press, 2003.
0.000
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 both IBC & UBC
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO)
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE
P=
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE
H=
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING
B=
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
S=
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A)
F=
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH
===> D =
0
29.843
62.11
6
0.2
2
8
no
k
ft
ft
ksf / ft
P
H
ft
Use 6 ft dia x 19.75 ft deep footing unrestrained @ ground level
ANALYSIS
LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM :
LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 :
REQUIRD DEPTH :
S 3 = FSD
S 1 = 0.33S 3
2.34 P
A=
BS1
D=
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE

HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
1ST TRIAL
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1)
REQD FOOTING DEPTH
2ND TRIAL :
REQD FOOTING DEPTH
3RD TRIAL :
REQD FOOTING DEPTH
4TH TRIAL :
REQD FOOTING DEPTH
5TH TRIAL :
REQD FOOTING DEPTH
A
4.36H
1+ 1+
2
A
4.25 PH
BS 3
, FOR NONCONSTRAINED
, FOR CONSTRAINED
P =>
H =>
B =>
FS =>
NONCONSTRAINED
29.84
k
62.1
ft
6.00
ft
0.40
ksf / ft
CONSTRAINED
29.84
k
62.1
ft
6.00
ft
0.40
ksf / ft
TRY D1 =>
8.00
ft
8.00
ft
S1
=>
1.06
ksf
1.06
ksf
S3
=>
3.20
ksf
3.20
ksf
A =>
RQRD D =>
11.02
33.38
ft
20.26
ft
20.69
2.73
ft
ksf
14.13
1.86
ft
ksf
=>
8.28
ksf
5.65
ksf
A =>
RQRD D =>
4.26
19.25
ft
15.24
ft
19.97
2.64
ft
ksf
14.69
1.94
ft
ksf
=>
7.99
ksf
5.87
ksf
A =>
RQRD D =>
4.42
19.64
ft
14.95
ft
19.80
2.61
ft
ksf
14.82
1.96
ft
ksf
=>
7.92
ksf
5.93
ksf
A =>
RQRD D =>
4.45
19.73
ft
14.88
ft
19.77
2.61
ft
ksf
14.85
1.96
ft
ksf
=>
7.91
ksf
5.94
ksf
A =>
RQRD D =>
4.46
19.75
ft
14.87
ft
TRY D2=>
S1 =>
S3
TRY D3=>
S1 =>
S3
TRY D4=>
S1 =>
S3
TRY D5=>
S1 =>
S3
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Deep Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
PEDESTAL DIAMETER
SQUARE FOOTING LENGTH
c
L
=
=
60
18
in
ft
Df
10.5
ft
FOOTING THICKNESS
WATER TABLE
T
h
=
=
18
8
in
ft
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
AXIAL DEAD LOAD
PDL
73.1
AXIAL LIVE LOAD
PLL
365.4 k

PLAT
WIND AXIAL LOAD
=
=
0
Wind,ASD
-79.175 k, ASD, uplift
WIND MOMENT LOAD
MLAT
867.41 ft-k, ASD
WIND SHEAR LOAD
VLAT
11.95 k, ASD
SURCHARGE
qs
0.1
ksf
BBACKFILL SOIL WEIGHT
ws
0.1
kcf
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
Qa
ksf
#
#
4
10
10
spiral @
FOOTING REINFORCING SIZE

PEDESTAL VERT. REINF. SIZE
PEDESTAL SHEAR. REINF.
22
#
vertical
3
in o.c.
DESIGN SUMMARY
TOP FOOTING REINF., E. WAY =>
BOT. FOOTING REINF., E. WAY =>
6 # 10
29 # 10 @ 7 in o.c.
ANALYSIS
CASE 1:
DL + LL
P
=
439
CASE 2:
DL + LL + 1.3 W
P
=
336
M
=
1128
e
=
3.4
CASE 3:
DL + LL + 0.65 W
P
=
387
M
=
434
e
=
1.1
kips
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
1.2 DL + 1.6 LL
1.2 DL + LL + 1.6 W
0.9 DL+ 1.6 W
Pu
Pu
Mu
eu
Pu
Mu
eu
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

MR / MO =
Where MO =
2.28444
>
F = 1.5
[Satisfactory]
MLAT + VLAT Df - 0.5 PLATL =
1705
Pftg =
(0.15 kcf) [T L2 + ( c2/ 4)(Df - T)] =
wsat =
ws + 0.018 kcf =
wwater =
k-ft
99.41
k, footing weight
0.118 kcf, saturated soil weight
0.0625 kcf, water specifc weight
Psoil =
[ws MIN(h, Df -T)+ (wsat - wwater) MAX(Df - T - h, 0)] (L2 - c2/ 4) =
MR =
0.5 (PDL + Pftg + Psoil) L =
3896
260.38 k, soil wt
k-ft
F = 1.5 for wind, IBC 1609.1.3

CHECK UPLIFT CAPACITY
FGravity / FUplift =
Where FUplift =
Pftg =
Psoil =
7.55168
>
- PLAT = 79.2
1.0
[Satisfactory]
99.41
k, footing weight
425.40
k, soil weight with 30o pyramid
FGravity = PDL+ Pftg+ Psoil =
597.9 k
672
326
1388
4.3
-61
1388
-22.8
kips
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
kips
ft-kips
ft, fr cl ftg
(cont'd)
Service Loads
P
e
CASE 1
438.5
0.0
CASE 2
335.6
3.4
CASE 3
387.0
1.1
qs L2
32.4
32.4
32.4
k, (surcharge load)
Pftg
P
33.1
504.0
33.1
401.1
33.1
452.6
k
M
e
0.0
0.0
1290.8
3.2 > L/6
496.4
1.1 < L/6
qmax
1.6
2.6
1.9
ksf
qallow
4.0
5.3
5.3
ksf
< L/6
Where
[Sati
k
ft, (from center of footing)
k-ft, (VLat included)

ft
(cont'd)
ColL
Section
0
0.09 L 0.18 L 0.27 L
1.63
3.25
4.88
6.50
Mu,pedestal (ft-k)
ColR
0.73 L
0.82 L
0.91 L
11.50
13.13
14.75
16.38
18
772.52 242.06 -288.41 -818.87 -1349.3
Vu,pedestal (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
326.4
326.4
326.4
326.4
Pu,surch (klf)
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
Mu,surch (ft-k)
-2.4
-9.5
-21.4
-38.0
-119.0
-155.0
-195.8
-241.3
-291.6
Vu,surch (k)
2.9
5.9
8.8
11.7
20.7
23.6
26.6
29.5
32.4
23.99
23.99
23.99
23.99
23.99
23.99
23.99
23.99
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
23.99
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
39.0
78.0
-31.669 -126.68 -285.02 -506.71 -1586.1

116.9
155.9
23.99
-2066
326.4
-2609.2 -3215.8 -3885.7
275.8
314.8
353.8
392.8
431.7
2.89
3.19
3.48
3.78
4.07
qu,soil (ksf)
0.81
1.10
1.40
1.69
1.99
Mu,soil (ft-k)
21.5
95.3
235.5
456.0
1787.6 2480.9 3325.9 4336.5 5526.7
-64.4
-109.5
-163.3
-382.9
Vu,soil (k)
-27.9
Mu (ft-k)
-12.56 -40.888 -70.959 -88.746 854.97 501.96 232.45 60.449
Vu (kips)
14.0
19.4
16.2
4.3

ColL
Section
0
0.09 L 0.18 L 0.27 L
1.63
3.25
4.88
6.50
-471.9
-569.5
-675.7
-790.6
0
240.1
193.0
137.3
73.0
ColR
0.73 L
0.82 L
0.91 L
11.50
13.13
14.75
16.38
18.00
Mu,pedestal (ft-k)
Vu,pedestal (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-60.9
-60.9
-60.9
-60.9
-60.9
0.00
1740.8 1839.8 1938.7 2037.7 2136.6
Pu,surch (klf)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mu,surch (ft-k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Vu,surch (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.99
17.99
17.99
17.99
17.99
17.99
17.99
17.99
17.99
Pu,ftg & fill (klf)
17.99
Vu,ftg & fill (k)
29.2
58.5
87.7
116.9
-23.752 -95.007 -213.77 -380.03 -1189.6 -1549.5 -1956.9 -2411.9 -2914.3
qu,soil (ksf)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mu,soil (ft-k)
206.9
236.1
265.3
294.6
323.8
2.10
2.40
2.70
3.00
3.29
1491.4 1361.3 1189.6 990.32 777.68
Vu,soil (k)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-294.4
-283.0
-262.9
Mu (ft-k)
-23.8
-95.0
-213.8
-380.0
2042.6 1651.6 1171.4
-291.0
-297.0
616.1
Vu (kips)
29.2
58.5
87.7
116.9
-145.0
-49.3
-121.8
-89.9
DESIGN FLEXURE
Location
Top Longitudinal
Bottom Longitudinal
Mu,max
-380.0 ft-k
2042.6 ft-k
d (in)
15.37
14.37
min
reqD
max
smax
0.0021 0.0017 0.0155 no limit
0.0023 0.0118 0.0155
18
use
6 # 10
29 # 10 @ 7 in o.c.
provD
0.0023
0.0119
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR

Vc = 2 b d (fc')0.5
Direction
Vu,max
Longitudinal
242.8 k
255
check Vu < Vc
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FOOTING PUNCHING SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.5.2, 11.12.1.2, 11.12.6, & 13.5.3.2)
v u ( psi ) =
0.5 v M u [ d + c ]
Pu R
+
J
AP
J = 0.5 ( d + c ) d
R=
P u ( d + c )
4A f
A P = b 0d
v c ( psi ) = ( 2 + y ) f c'
A f = L2
y = MIN 2,
v = 0.4
d +c 2 d 3
+
2
3
, 40
d
b0
b0 = ( c + d )
Case
Pu
Mu
b0
Af
Ap
vu (psi)
vc
1
2
3
704.2
358.2
-37.0
0.0
1559.9
1559.9
233.6
233.6
233.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
324.0
324.0
324.0
23.3
23.3
23.3
65.6
33.4
-3.4
113.7
113.7
113.7
27.4
31.0
15.6
164.3
164.3
164.3
0.75
[Satisfactory]
where
(ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )
(cont'd)
CHECK PEDESTAL REINF. LIMITATIONS
max
=
0.08 (ACI 318-02, Section 10.9)
min
=
0.01 (ACI 318-02, Section 10.9)
smax
smin
=
=
3
1
(ACI 318-02, Section 7.10.4.3)

(ACI 318-02, Section 7.10.4.3)
provd
0.011
[Satisfactory]
sprovd
in
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Grade Beam Design Based on ACI 318 & CBC 1633A.2.12

DESIGN CRITERIA
THE CBC 1633A.2.12, FACTOR 0, IS ONLY FOR FOOTING SHEAR AND BENDING CHECK, AND CONNECTION DESIGN.
1.
2.
3.
USING ( 0/1.4) E TO CHECK SOIL CAPACITY AND OVERTURNING IS ADEQUATE.

WHEN LATERAL FRAME LOADS ARE NOT BIG, USING SQUIRE PADS WITH GRADE BEAM TIED THEM TOGETHER
WILL COST LESS THAN COMBINED FOOTING.THE SQUIRE PADS TAKE VERTICAL LOAD TO CENTRIC SOIL PRESSURE,
WHILE THE BEAM BALANCED MOMENTS AND NEGLECTING SOIL PRESSURE ON THE BEAM. SEE THIS SHEET BELOW.
WHEN LATERAL FRAME LOADS ARE BIG, USING COMBINED FOOTING IS EFFICIENT. SEE SHEETS OF COMBINED
FOOTING & COMBINED FOOTING OPTION FOR MORE INFORMATION.

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc' =
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS

SQUIRE PAD SIZE
fy
B
T
W
D
L
Le
60
7
12
36
36
22
8
ksi
ft
in
in
in
ft
ft
GRADE BEAM SIZE

COLUMN DISTANCE
GRADE BEAM EXTENSION
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
FRAME AXIAL LOADS, ASD
PD,1 =
25
kips
PD,2 =
25
kips
(Dead Load)
PL,1 =
15
kips
PL,2 =
15
kips
(Live Load)
SEISMIC AXIAL LOADS, SD
PE,1 =
-15
kips
PE,2 =
30
kips
(Seismic Load)
SEISMIC SHEAR LOADS, SD
VE,1 =
35
kips
VE,2 =
35
kips
(Seismic Load)
SEISMIC MOMENTS, SD
ME,1 =
50
ft-kips
ME,2 =
50
ft-kips
(Seismic Load)
SEISMIC AMPLIFICATION
0 =
2.2
, (CBC 1633A.2.12)
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE

PAD REINFORCING
Qa =
10
2.5
#
ksf
8
GRADE BEAM LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING

TOP
7
#
8
( d = 31.88 in )
( 1 Layer)
BOTTOM
7
#
7
( d = 31.94 in )
( 1 Layer)
GRADE BEAM HOOPS (ACI 21.3.3)
LOCATION
AT END
LENGTH
72
in
@ 8 o.c., Each Way, Bottom.
AT SPLICE
55
in
0.5
( 2h )
MAX{0.075fydb/[(fc') (c+Ktr)/db], 12}
Legs # 5
4 Legs # 5
@ 7 in o.c.
@ 4 in o.c.
MIN(d/4, 8db, 24dt, 12)
MIN(d/4, 4)
BAR
SPACING
THE GRADE BEAM DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK OVERTURNING AT CENTER BOTTOM OF PAD 2
MO =
MR =
( 0/1.4)[ME,1 + ME,2 + (VE,1+VE,2)(D+T) - PE,1L]

2
(PD,1 + conc B T) L + 0.5conc(L + 2Le) L D W =
1115.7
1276.0
>
ft-kips
MO / 0.9 =
1240
ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
<
4/3 Qa
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY

Q M AX =
where
M O P D ,2 + P L ,2 + ( CONC
+
2
B L
conc =
0.15 kcf
soil =
0.11 kcf
SOIL
)
2
2
B T + WD ( 0.5 L + L e )
2.03
ksf, (net pressure)
(cont'd)
CHECK PAD FLEXURAL REINFORCING
0.85 f
'
c
1 1
f
where
Mu
0.383B d 2 f
'
c
0.0048
<
provd =
d=
8.00
Qu,max = 1.5 Qmax =
0.0118
in
3.05
ksf, (SD, CBC 1915A. 2.1)
Mu = 0.125 (B-W) B Qu,max =
109
max =
0.0160
(ACI 10.2.7.3 & 10.3.3)
min =
0.0018
(ACI 7.12.2.1)
ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
CHECK PAD ONE WAY SHEAR CAPACITY

Vu
<
Vn
[Satisfactory]
where
Vu = 0.5 (B - W) B Qu,max - d B Qu,max =

Vn = 2 d B (fc')
=
0.85
0.5
62.6

Pu = 0(VE,1 - VE,2) =
0
kips
Ln=L - B =
15.00
ft
W/D=
W =
1.00
36
in
>
>
0.3
>
<
28.4
kips
kips
<
0.1Agfc' =
4d=
10.65
[Satisfactory]
10
in
B+1.5D =
138
388.8
ft
kips
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
in
[Satisfactory]
CHECK GB FLEXURAL REQUIREMENTS
(ACI 21.3.2.1)
(ACI 21.3.2.2)
top =
0.005
bot =
0.004
>
Mn,top
where
>
<
>
<
min=MIN[3(fc')0.5/fy, 200/fy ]=
0.003
max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
(1/2)Mn,bot
[Satisfactory]
Mn,bot = bot bd fy (1 - 0.588bot fy/fc') =
642
ft-kips

=
0.9
831
ft-kips
2
2
M u ,top = 1.5 M GB ,wt + P D,1 + P L ,1 +
>
>
Mu,bot / [Satisfactory]
Mu,top / [Satisfactory]
0
0
0
0
2
P E ,1 + Wt PAD ,1 Q MIN B L 0.5 V E ,1D M E ,1 Q MIN (V E ,1 + V E ,2 ) / ( Q MAX + Q MIN ) ( 0.5 D + T ) =
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
-171
ft-kips
0
0
0
0
2
P E ,2 + Wt PAD,1 Q MAX B L 0.5 V E ,2D M E ,2 Q MAX (V E ,1 + V E ,2 ) / ( Q MAX + Q MIN ) ( 0.5D + T ) =
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
-489
ft-kips
M u ,bot = 1.5 M GB,wt P D,2 + P L,2 +
where
[Satisfactory]
Q MAX =
QMIN =
2
M O P D ,2 + P L ,2 + CONC B T + WD ( 0.5L + L e )
+
=
2
2
BL
B
0.94
2.52
377.1
kips
[Satisfactory]
348.9
kips
Factor 1.5 is for SD

where
121.1
kips
<
<
8(fc')0.5bd =
[2(fc')0.5bd + Avfyd/s ] =
Mpr,top = top bd2fy (1.25 - 0.919top fy/fc') =
1024
ft-kips

=
0.75
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
in2
1.24
Av =
793
ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Combined Footing Design Based on CBC 2001 Chapter A

DESIGN CRITERIA
THE CBC 1633A.2.12, FACTOR 0, IS ONLY FOR FOOTING SHEAR AND BENDING CHECK, AND CONNECTION DESIGN.
1.
USING ( 0/1.4) E TO CHECK SOIL CAPACITY AND OVERTURNING IS ADEQUATE.
2.
BASED ON CBC 1915A.2.1, USING ASD SOIL PRESSURE, SECTION FORCES AT ( 0/1.4) E ABOVE, MULTPLY BY 1.5 TO DESIGN
3.
REINFORCEING CONCRETE.
IF THE FOOTING TO HAVE TO COMPLY WITH SEISMIC REQUIREMENTS OF CONCRETE FRAME BEAM, ACI 318 SECTION 21,
SEE SHEETS OF COMBINED FOOTING OPTION FOR MORE INFORMATION.
INPUT DATA
COLUMN WIDTH
COLUMN DEPTH
AXIAL DEAD LOAD
COL#1
COL#2
c1
c2
PDL
=
=
=
14
14
50.05
14
14
50.91
in
in
k
k
PLL
19.21
21.92
SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD, SD
PLAT
-170
170
SEISMIC SHEAR LOAD, SD
VLAT
117.6
117.6
SEISMIC MOMENT, SD
MLAT
3.27
3.27
k-ft
2.2
AXIAL LIVE LOAD
SEISMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTOR
,(Tab. 16A-N)
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
Qa
ksf
DISTANCE TO LEFT EDGE
L1
11.75
ft

DISTANCE TO RIGHT EDGE
S
L2
=
=
18
29
ft
ft
10.17
ft
Df
4.5
ft
FOOTING WIDTH
FTG EMBEDMENT DEPTH
FOOTING THICKNESS
ksi
42
in
SURCHARGE
qs
ksf
SOIL WEIGHT
ws
0.11
kcf
#
#
10
5
=
=
=
58.75
10.17
42
ft
ft
in
-198
5.1
LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING BAR SIZE

TRANSVERSE REINFORCING BAR SIZE
DESIGN SUMMARY
FOOTING LENGTH
FOOTING WIDTH
FOOTING THICKNESS
L
B
T
BAND WIDTH
be =
LONG. REINF AT TOP

LONG. REINF AT BOTTOM
TRANS. REINF. AT BAND WIDTH
8 # 10 @ 16 in o.c., cont.
21 # 10 @ 5 in o.c., cont.
30 # 5 @ 4 in o.c., bottom
10.17
ft
ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS (CBC SEC.1612A.3.2 & ACI 318 SEC.9.2.1)
SERVICE LOADS
CASE 1 : DL + LL
CASE 2 : DL + LL + (0 / 1.4) E
CASE 3 : 0.9 DL + (0 / 1.4) E
COL # 1
69
k
V
P
=
=
185
-222
5.1
185
COL # 2
73
k
340
ft-k
5.1
ft-k
k
k
185
313
k
k
ft-k
5.1
ft-k
185
6482
k-ft
(e
(e
(e
TOTAL
142
k
-8.40 ft, fr CL ftg )
142
k
10.3
25.52
370
91
ft-k
ft, fr CL ftg )
k
k
10.3
44.49
370
ft-k
ft, fr CL ftg )
k

MR / MO =
Where
2.31003
>
F = 1 / (0.9x1.4)
[Satisfactory]
Pftg =
(0.15 kcf) T B L =
313.68
k, footing weight
Psoil =
ws (Df - T) B L =
65.72
k, soil weight
MR =
PDL 1(L - L1) + PDL 2L2 + 0.5 (Pftg + Psoil) L =
14974
k-ft
MO =
(0 /1.4)[MLAT 1 + MLAT 2 + (VLAT 1 + VLAT 2) Df - PLAT 1(L - L1) - PLAT 2L2] =
CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318 SEC.15.2.2)

Service Loads
P
e
qs B L
(0.15-ws)T B L
P
e
qmax
qallow
CASE 1
142.1
-8.4
0.0
83.6
225.7
-5.3
0.2
2.0
CASE 2
142.1
25.5
0.0
83.6
< L/6
225.7
16.1
1.1
2.7
CASE 3
90.9
44.5
0.0
75.3
> L/6
166.1
24.3
2.2
2.7
k
ft
k, (surcharge load)
> L/6
[Satisfactory]
k
ft
ksf
ksf
(cont'd)
Where
( P )
1+
6e
L
,
BL
2 ( P )
,
3B (0.5 L e)
q MAX =
L
6
L
e>
6
e
for
for

(ACI 318 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, 12.5, 15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)
( Pu )
q u ,MAX =
1+
6eu
L
BL
2 ( P u )
3B(0.5L eu)
MIN = 0.0018
L
, for eu
6
, for eu >
MAX = 0.75
L
6
T
d
Mu
0.85 f 'c 1 1
0.383bd 2 f 'c
f y
SERVICE SOIL PRESSURE WITH FOOTING WEIGHT

ASD Loads
CASE 1
P
142.1
e
-8.4
qs B L
0.0
[0.15 T + ws (Df - T)] B L
379.4
P
e
521.5
-2.3
0.669
q, max
'
0.85 1 f c
87
87 + f y
f y
< L/6
CASE 2
142.1
25.5
0.0
379.4
CASE 3
90.9
44.5
0.0
341.5
521.5
7.0
1.493
432.3
9.3
1.414
< L/6
FOOTING MOMENT & SHEAR AT LONGITUDINAL SECTIONS FOR CASE 1 , ASD

0.5 L1
L1 left
L1 right
Section
0
0.2 S
0.4 S
X (ft)
M,col (ft-k)
V,col (k)
P,surch (klf)
M,surch (ft-k)
V,surch (k)
P,ftg & fill (klf)
M,ftg & fill (ft-k)
V,ftg & fill (k)
q,soil (ksf)
M,soil (ft-k)
V,soil (k)
0
0
0
0.00
0
0
6.46
0
0
1.08
0
0
5.88
0
0.0
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-111
37.9
1.04
187
-63.1
11.75
0
0.0
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-446
75.9
1.00
737
-123.8
11.75
0
69.3
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-446
75.9
1.00
737
-123.8
M (ft-k)
V (kips)
0
0
75
-25.2
291
-47.9
291
21.3
15.35
-249
69.3
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-761
99.1
0.97
1248
-159.8
237
8.6
k
ft
k, (surcharge load)
k, (footing & backfill loads)
k
ft
ksf
< L/6
0.6 S
0.8 S
L2 left
L2 right
0.5 L2
18.95
-499
69.3
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-1160
122.4
0.95
1886
-194.8
22.55
-748
69.3
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-1642
145.6
0.92
2649
-229.0
26.15
-997
69.3
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-2208
168.9
0.90
3534
-262.2
29.75
-1,247
69.3
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-2858
192.1
0.87
4536
-294.5
29.75
-1,247
142.1
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-2858
192.1
0.87
4536
-294.5
44.25
-3,307
142.1
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-6323
285.8
0.77
9702
-415.4
58.75
-5,367
142.1
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-11145
379.4
0.67
16512
-521.5
228
-3.2
259
-14.1
328
-24.1
432
-33.2
432
39.7
72
12.4
0
0
500
400
300
200
100
0
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60

0.5 L1
L1 left
L1 right
0
Section
0.2 S
0.4 S
0.6 S
0.8 S
L2 left
L2 right
0.5 L2
X (ft)
M,col (ft-k)
V,col (k)
P,surch (klf)
M,surch (ft-k)
V,surch (k)
P,ftg & fill (klf)
M,ftg & fill (ft-k)
V,ftg & fill (k)
q,soil (ksf)
M,soil (ft-k)
V,soil (k)
0
0
0
0.00
0
0
6.46
0
0
0.25
0
0
5.88
0
0.0
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-111
37.9
0.38
52
-18.8
11.75
0
0.0
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-446
75.9
0.50
236
-45.1
11.75
5
-197.9
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-446
75.9
0.50
236
-45.1
15.35
718
-197.9
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-761
99.1
0.58
433
-64.8
18.95
1,430
-197.9
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-1160
122.4
0.65
706
-87.3
22.55
2,142
-197.9
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-1642
145.6
0.73
1065
-112.6
26.15
2,855
-197.9
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-2208
168.9
0.80
1520
-140.7
29.75
3,567
-197.9
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-2858
192.1
0.88
2081
-171.5
29.75
3,572
142.1
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-2858
192.1
0.88
2081
-171.5
44.25
1,512
142.1
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-6323
285.8
1.19
5618
-324.0
58.75
-548
142.1
0.00
0
0.0
6.46
-11145
379.4
1.49
11693
-521.5
M (ft-k)
V (kips)
0
0
-60
19.1
-210
30.8
-205
-167.1
389
-163.5
976
-162.8
1565
-164.9
2166
-169.7
2790
-177.3
2795
162.7
808
103.9
0
0
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000
(cont'd)
200
100
0
-100
-200

0.5 L1
L1 left
L1 right
Section
0
0.2 S
0.4 S
0.6 S
0.8 S
L2 left
L2 right
0.5 L2
X (ft)
M,col (ft-k)
V,col (k)
P,surch (klf)
M,surch (ft-k)
V,surch (k)
P,ftg & fill (klf)
M,ftg & fill (ft-k)
V,ftg & fill (k)
q,soil (ksf)
M,soil (ft-k)
V,soil (k)
0
0
0
0.00
0
0
5.81
0
0
0.03
0
0
5.88
0
0.0
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-100
34.1
0.17
14
-6.1
11.75
0
0.0
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-401
68.3
0.31
88
-20.4
11.75
5
-222.1
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-401
68.3
0.31
88
-20.4
15.35
805
-222.1
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-685
89.2
0.39
183
-33.3
18.95
1604
-222.1
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-1044
110.1
0.48
331
-49.2
22.55
2404
-222.1
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-1478
131.1
0.56
542
-68.3
26.15
3203
-222.1
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-1987
152.0
0.65
826
-90.5
29.75
4003
-222.1
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-2572
172.9
0.73
1197
-115.7
29.75
4,008
90.9
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-2572
172.9
0.73
1197
-115.7
44.25
2,691
90.9
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-5690
257.2
1.07
3779
-248.9
58.75
1,373
90.9
0.00
0
0.0
5.81
-10031
341.5
1.41
8658
-432.3
M (ft-k)
V (kips)
0
0
-86
28.1
-314
47.9
-308
-174.2
303
-166.2
892
-161.2
1468
-159.3
2043
-160.6
2628
-164.9
2633
148.0
780
99.2
0
0
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500
200
100
0
-100
-200
DESIGN FLEXURE, Mu = 1.5 M, (CBC 1915A.2.1 )

Mu,max
d (in)
min
reqD
max
smax(in)
use
provD
Top Longitudinal
Bottom Longitudinal
ft-k
ft-k
39.37
38.37
0.0019
0.0020
0.0006
0.0055
0.0160
0.0160
no limit
18
8 # 10 @ 16 in o.c., cont.
21 # 10 @ 5 in o.c., cont.
0.0021
0.0057
ft-k / ft
37.42
0.0020
6.1E-05
0.0160
18
30 # 5 @ 4 in o.c.
0.0020
Location
-470
4193
Bottom Transverse, be
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR, Vu = 1.5 M, (CBC 1915A.2.1 )
Vc = 2 b d (fc')0.5
Vu,max
Direction
Longitudinal
Transverse
266
3
k
k / ft
436
42
check Vu < Vc
k
k / ft
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
CHECK PUNCHING SHEAR (ACI 318 SEC.15.5.2, 11.12.1.2, 11.12.6, & 13.5.3.2)
P u R 0.5 v M ub1
+
J
AP
2
3
d b1
d
b
1+
+3 2
6
b1
b1
A P = 2 ( b1 + b 2 ) d
v u( psi ) =
J =
R=
v = 1
Col. 1
Col. 2
2
3
y = MIN 2,
b1
b2
A f = Bb e
P ub1b2
Af
Column
1+
f 'c
v c ( psi ) = ( 2 + y )
b0 =
, 40
d
b0
AP ,
b1 = ( c1 + d ) , b 2 = ( c 2 + d )
d
Case
Pu
Mu
b1
b2
Af
Ap
vu (psi)
vc
1
2
3
1
2
3
103.9
0.0
0.0
109.2
510.0
469.4
0.0
7.7
7.7
0.0
7.7
7.7
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
51.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
103.4
103.4
103.4
103.4
103.4
103.4
53.4
53.4
53.4
53.4
53.4
53.4
18.4
0.0
0.0
19.4
90.5
83.3
185.2
185.2
185.2
185.2
185.2
185.2
11.1
0.2
0.2
11.7
54.8
50.4
186.2
186.2
186.2
186.2
186.2
186.2
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Combined Footing Based on ACI 318

DESIGN SUMMARY
CONCRETE STRENGTH
f c' =
REBAR YIELD STRESS

FOOTING WIDTH
FOOTING THICKNESS
fy
W
D
L
=
=
=
=
ksi
60
122.04
42
18
ksi
in
in
ft
COMBINED FOOTING LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING

TOP
14
#
10
( d = 37.74 in )
( 1 Layer)
BOTTOM
21
#
10
( d = 37.74 in )
( 1 Layer)
COMBINED FOOTING HOOPS (ACI 21.3.3)
LOCATION
AT END
LENGTH
84
in
AT SPLICE
70
in
11 Legs # 5
@ 4 in o.c.
( 2h )
11 Legs # 5
@ 9 in o.c.
BAR
SPACING
MIN(d/4, 8db, 24dt, 12)
MIN(d/4, 4)
THE SEISMIC DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
Ln=L - c1 =
16.83
W /D=
W =
2.91
122.04
>
ft
>
0.3
>
in
4d=
12.58
[Satisfactory]
10
in
ft
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SEISMIC FLEXURAL REQUIREMENTS

(ACI 21.3.2.1)
(ACI 21.3.2.2)
top =
0.004
bot =
0.006
Mn,top
>
where
>
<
>
<
min=MIN[3(fc')0.5/fy, 200/fy ]= 0.003

max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
(1/2)Mn,bot
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
4690
ft-kips
3203
ft-kips

where
576.9
kips
<
8(fc')0.5bd =
<
[2(fc')0.5bd + Avfyd/s ] =
Mpr,top = top bd fy (1.25 - 0.919top fy/fc') =
3956
ft-kips

=
0.75
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
in2
Av =
3.41
5755
ft-kips
1513.6
kips
[Satisfactory]
1021.9
kips
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Footing Design Based on CBC 1633A.2.12
CBC 1633A.2.12 Foundations and superstructure-to-foundation connections

The foundation shall be capable of transmitting the design base shear and the overturning forces from the structure into the supporting soil.
The In addition, the foundation and the connection of the superstructure elements to the foundation shall have the strength to resist,
dition to gravity loads, the lesser of the following seismic loads:
1.
The strength of the superstructure elements.
2.
The maximum forces that would occur in the fully yielded structural system.
3.
o times the forces in the superstructure elements due to the seismic forces as prescribed in this chapter.
EXCEPTIONS:
1.
Where structures are designed using R 2.2 such as for inverted pendulum-type structures.
2.
When it can be demonstrated that inelastic deformation of the foundation and superstructure-tofoundation connection will not result
in a weak story or cause collapse of the structure.
3.
Where the basic structural system as described in Table 16A-N consists of light-framed walls with shear panels.
Where moment resistance is assumed at the base of the superstructure elements, the rotation and flexural deformation of the foundation as
well as deformation of the superstructure-to-foundation connection shall be considered in the drift and deformation compatibility analyses.
NOTE
THERE IS A STATEWIDE CONSENSUS THAT THIS SECTION WILL ONLY BE APPLICABLE TO MEMENT FRAMES (SMRF AND OMRF),
ECCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES (EBF), AND HEAVILY LOADED CONCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES (OCBF AND SCBF). THIS SECTION
WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE TO WOOD SHEAR WALL OR CONCRETE OR MASONRY SHEAR WALLS EXCEPT WHERE THESE WALLS
ARE VERY HEAVILY LOADED. FOR WOOD SHEAR WALLS, VERY HEAVILY LOADED IS DEFINED TO BE OVER 600 PLF OF SHEAR
IN A WALL.
ALTERNATE DESIGN METHOD
IF USING THE SOFTWARE STILL GET UNACCEPTABLE BIG FOOTING SIZE, JUST DESIGN THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN DRAG AND
LATERAL FRAME WITHOUT OVER STRENGTH, OR DESIGN DIAPHRAGM SHEAR CAPACITY AT THE LATERAL FRAME SIDES AS
SMALLER AS POSSIBLE. THEN DEVELOP THE SUPERSTRECTURE STRENGTH TO FOUNDATION LOADS. USE REGULAR SOFTWARE
AT www.engineering-international.com TO DESIGN THE FOOTING. (CBC 1633A.2.12 Item 1 & 2)
30
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Mat Boundary Spring Generator

L
=
64
ft
B
=
30
ft
GRID TRIBUTARY AREA
A
=
1
ft2
3
K1
= 100 lb / in
MODULUS OF SUBGRADE
(Obtained from the soil report for 1' x 1' sf plate load test,
in the absence of a soil report obtain from table below )
FOUNDATION LENGTH
FOUNDATION WIDTH
5.3
2.6
1.3
INSIDE SPRING VALUE

EDGE SPRING VALUE
CORNER SPRING VALUE
kips / joint
kips / joint
kips / joint
ANALYSIS
k s=
k11
( for B = L )
k12
( for B < L )
B+1
2B
k11=k1
B+1
2B
k12 = k1
0.5L
+1
B
1.5
36.8
lb / in
26.7
lb / in3
46
k / ft
36.8
lb / in3
64
k / ft3
TYPICAL VALUES OF MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTIONS, K1 (lb / in3 )

5 to 8%
Silts and clays (liquid limit >50)

(OH, CH, MH )
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
Silts and clays (liquid limit <50)

(OL, CL, ML )
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
300
250
225
200
150
Gravelly sands
(SW & SP )
Over 300
300
250
Silty and clayey gravels

(GM & GC )
Over 300
Over 300
300
Gravel and sand
Over 300
Over 300
Silty and clay sands

(SM & SH )
9 to 12%
MOISTURE CONTENT
13 to 16%
1 to 4%
TYPE OF MATERIAL
17 to 20%
21 to 24%
25 to 28%
> 28%
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Plain Concrete Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
DESIGN SUMMARY
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
in
FOOTING WIDTH
3.00
COLUMN DEPTH
c2
in
FOOTING LENGTH
3.00
ft
BASE PLATE WIDTH
b1
in
FOOTING THICKNESS
in
BASE PLATE DEPTH
=
=
=
10
13
8
k
k
k
b2
in

REBAR YIELD STRESS
AXIAL DEAD LOAD
fc'
fy
PDL
=
=
=
2.5
60
2
ksi
ksi
k
AXIAL LIVE LOAD
PLL
4.5

PLAT
SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD
=
=
1
6.5
Seismic,SD
k, SD
SURCHARGE
SOIL WEIGHT
FOOTING THICKNESS
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
FOOTING WIDTH
FOOTING LENGTH
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0
0.11
0.50
5
1
3
3
ksf
kcf
ft
in
ksf
ft
ft
qs
ws
Df
T
Qa
B
L
ft

ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS (IBC 2000 SEC.1605.3.2 & ACI 318-02 SEC.9.2.1)
CASE 1:
DL + LL
P =
7
k
CASE 2:
DL + LL + E / 1.4
P =
11
k
CASE 3:
0.9 DL + E / 1.4
P =
7
k
1.2 DL + 1.6 LL
1.2 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 E
0.9 DL + 1.0 E

CASE 1
CASE 2
P
q MAX =
=
0.74
ksf,
1.25 ksf,
CASE 3
0.73 ksf
BL
q MAX
<
Pu
Pu
Pu
kQa,
[Satisfactory]
where k = 1 for grovity loads, 4/3 for lateral loads.

DESIGN FOR FLEXURE (ACI 318-02 SEC.22.5.1)
M n = MIN 5
where
Mu =
'
'
f c S , 0.85 f cS
=
=
1.72
ft-kips
0.55 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.5 )

elastic section modulus of section
( 0.5 L 0.25b1 0.25c1T )
P u ,max
2L
1.71
<
ft-kips
150
in3
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.22.5.4)
4
3
V n =
'
f c BT
where
6.60
kips
0.55
(ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.5 )
P u ,max
V u = ( 0.5L 0.25b1 0.25c1 T )
L
3.91
<
kips
[Satisfactory]
CHECK PUNCHING SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.22.5.4)
V n = MIN
4
8
+
, 2.66
3 3 c
where
V u = P u ,ma x 1
=
=
f c ( c1 + c2 + b1 + b2 + 4T ) T
'
13.53
kips
0.55 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.5 )

ratio of long side to short side of concentrated load
1 b1 + c 1
+T
BL
2
b2+ c2 +T
2
12.52
=
ft-kips
1.43
<
[Satisfactory]
Tian Li
Daniel
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Design of Conventional Slabs on Expansive Soil Grade Based on ACI 360

1. DESIGN METHODS
1.1 DIVIDE AN IRREGULAR FOUNDATION PLAN INTO OVERLAPPING RECTANGLES AND USING
THIS SPREADSHEET DESIGN EACH RECTANGULAR SECTION SEPARATELY.
1.2 THE POST-TENSION INSTITUTE (PTI) METHOD IS ACCEPTABLE FOR THE DESIGN OF
NONPRESTRESSED SLAB ON GRADE (ACI 360, 2.4). THE DESIGNER MAY SELECT EITHER
NONPRESTRESSED REINFORCENENT USING THIS SPREADSHEET, OR POST-TENSIONED
REINFORCEMENT IF REQUIRED (ACI 360, 8.6).
2. INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

2.1 SOILS PROPERITIES
ALLOWABLE SOIL-BEARING PRESSURE
qallow
2000
EDGE MOISTURE VARIATION DISTANCE
em
DIFFERENTIAL SOIL MOVEMENT
ym
=
=
=
=
psf
ft, for center lift
4.5
ft, for edge lift
2.68
in, for center lift
0.3
in, for edge lift
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
164
ft
125
ft
=
=
=
=
@
2.2 STRUCTURAL DATA AND MATERIALS PROPERITIES

SLAB LENGTH
SLAB WIDTH
SLAB THICHNESS
PERIMETER LOADING
MAX BEARING LOADING ON THE SLAB
Pb
ADDED DEAD LOAD
DL
LIVE LOAD
LL
AVERAGE STIFFENING BEAM SPACING, L DIRECTION
SL
AVERAGE STIFFENING BEAM SPACING, B DIRECTION
SB
STIFFENING BEAM DEPTH
STIFFENING BEAM WIDTH
b
f'c
CONCRETE STRENGTH
SLAB REINFORCEMENT
in
270
plf
270
plf
50
psf
125
psf
30
ft
30
ft
24
in
20
in
THE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
ksi
18
in o.c., with
1.5
in clear from top of slab, each way.
3. ASSUME A TRIAL SECTION

3.1 ASSUME BEAM DEPTH AND SPACING
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT L DIRECTION
allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
=
=
Where
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT B DIRECTION
1.60
in
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
ft
Where
360
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT L DIRECTION

allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
=
=
Where
1.60
in
ft
360
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT B DIRECTION
0.80
in
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
ft
Where
=
=
720
BEAM DEPTH, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT L DIRECTION
0.80
in
ft
720
BEAM DEPTH, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT B DIRECTION
h = [(ym L)0.205 SB1.059 P0.523 em1.296 / 380 allow ]0.824 =
13.56
h = [(ym B)0.205 SL1.059 P0.523 em1.296 / 380 allow ]0.824 =
in
BEAM DEPTH, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT L DIRECTION
12.95
in
7.58
in
BEAM DEPTH, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT B DIRECTION
h = [L0.35 SB0.88 em0.74 ym0.76 / 15.9 allow P0.01]1.176 =

GOVERNING h =
=
=
13.56
8.47
h = [B0.35 SL0.88 em0.74 ym0.76 / 15.9 allow P0.01]1.176 =
in
<
in
ACTUAL h =
24.00
in
22
in2
[Satisfactory]
3.2 DETERMINE SECTION PROPERTIES

L DIRECTION
As
B DIRECTION
=
Es / Ec =
CGS
in2
17
9.29
21.75
in
9935
in2
337410
in4
yb
18.75
in
St
64268
in3
17995
in
Sb
As
beams
2.68
Es / Ec =
CGS
9.29
yb
19.00
beams
in
22.25
in
St
80834
in3
Sb
21276
in
12703
in2
404232
in4
4. CALCULATE MAXIMUM APPLIED SERVICE MOMENTS

4.1 CENTER LIFT MOMENT AT L DIRECTION
1.238
ML = A0 (B em
+ C) =
0.013
A0 = (L
Where
CENTER LIFT MOMENT AT B DIRECTION
4.96
0.306
SB
0.688
MB = (58 + em) ML / 60, for L /B > 1.1
ft-kips / ft
P
0.534
0.193
ym
) / 727 =
B = 1, for em < 5
B = MIN[(ym - 1) / 3, 1], for em > 5
MB = ML, for L /B < 1.1
0.891
C = MAX{[8 - (P - 613) / 255] (4 - ym) / 3], 0}, for em > 5

4.2 EDGE LIFT MOMENT AT L DIRECTION
0.10
(h em)
0.78
0.66
ym
0.0065
/ (7.2 L
5.12
ft-kips / ft
3.25
ft-kips / ft
1.00
C = 0, for em < 5
M L = SB
0.00
EDGE LIFT MOMENT AT B DIRECTION

P
0.04
) =
2.63
ft-kips / ft
0.35
MB = h
(19 + em) ML / 57.75, for L /B > 1.1
MB = ML, for L /B < 1.1
5. CHECK FLEXURAL CONCRETE STRESSES

5.1 ALLOWABLE CONCRETE STRESSES
FLEXURAL TENSILE STRESS
f t,allow = - 6 (f c')0.5 =
-0.329
ksi
FLEXURAL COMPRESSIVE STRESS
f c,allow = - 0.45 f c' =
1.350
ksi
5.2 TOP STRESS, FOR CENTER LIFT MOMENT, AT L DIRECTION

f = - M L / St =
Then
-0.116
TOP STRESS, FOR CENTER LIFT MOMENT, AT B DIRECTION

f = - M B / St =
ksi
>
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
Then
-0.125
ksi
>
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
5.3 BOTTOM STRESS, FOR CENTER LIFT MOMENT, AT L DIRECTION

f = M L / Sb =
0.413
Then
BOTTOM STRESS, FOR CENTER LIFT MOMENT, AT B DIRECTION

f = M B / Sb =
ksi
>
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
f = - M L / Sb =
-0.219
Then
f = - M B / Sb =
>
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
0.061
Then
[Satisfactory]
f c,allow
<
6. CHECK DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTIONS
Es =
0.5
= (Ec I / Es)
ft
1561009
1000
psi
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
ksi
>
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
/ 12 =
13.208
Es =
0.5
ft
1561009
1000
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION AT B DIRECTION
2.64
in
360
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
2.52
360
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
1.26
720
Where
FOR EDGE LIFT
in
FOR EDGE LIFT
allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
Where
1.32
in
720
Where
6.3 EXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING

1.059
SB
0.523
1.296
in
FOR CENTER LIFT, AT B DIRECTION

1.214
em
EXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING
FOR CENTER LIFT, AT L DIRECTION

/ (380 h
) =
0.80
<
0 = (ym B)0.205 SL1.059 P0.523 em1.296 / (380 h1.214) =
in
0.76
ym
0.88
SB
0.74
em
in
allow
[Satisfactory]
FOR EDGE LIFT, AT L DIRECTION

0.35
0.76
<
allow
[Satisfactory]
0 = L
psi
psi, soil
FOR CENTER LIFT
allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
0 = (ym L)
f t,allow
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (f c')
psi, soil
FOR CENTER LIFT
0.205
1/4
Where
6.2 ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION AT L DIRECTION
Where
ksi
>
RELATIVE STIFFNESS LENGTH AT B DIRECTION
12.624
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (f c')
Where
[Satisfactory]
0.079
Then
[Satisfactory]
6.1 RELATIVE STIFFNESS LENGTH AT L DIRECTION

= (Ec I / Es)1/4 / 12 =
[Satisfactory]
f c,allow
BOTTOM STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT B DIRECTION

f = M B / St =
f t,allow
f t,allow
<
-0.301
Then
ksi
>
ksi
>
TOP STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT B DIRECTION
ksi
5.5 BOTTOM STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT L DIRECTION

f = M L / St =
Then
5.4 TOP STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT L DIRECTION
0.474
FOR EDGE LIFT, AT B DIRECTION

0.85
/ (15.9 h
0.01
) =
0.58
<
0 = B
in
0.35
0.76
ym
0.88
0.74
SL
em
0.85
/ (15.9 h
0.01
) =
0.53
<
allow
[Satisfactory]
in
allow
[Satisfactory]
7. CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY

7.1 APPLIED SERVICE LOAD SHEAR AT L DIRECTION
APPLIED SERVICE LOAD SHEAR AT B DIRECTION
FOR CENTER LIFT

0.09
VL = L
0.71
SB
0.43
FOR CENTER LIFT

P
0.44
0.16
ym
0.93
em
/ 1940 =
1.786
VB = B0.19 SL0.45 h0.20 P0.54 ym0.04 em0.97 / 1350 =
kips/ft
FOR EDGE LIFT

VL = L0.07 h0.4 P0.03 ym0.67 em0.16 / (3.0 SB0.015) =
1.084
VB = B0.07 h0.4 P0.03 ym0.67 em0.16 / (3.0 SL0.015) =
kips/ft
7.2 ALLOWABLE CONCRETE SHEAR STRESS, AT L DIRECTION

v c = 2 (f c')0.5 =
1.327
kips/ft
1.063
kips/ft
FOR EDGE LIFT
0.110
ALLOWABLE CONCRETE SHEAR STRESS, AT B DIRECTION

v c = 2 (f c')0.5 =
ksi
7.3 SHEAR STRESS OF RIBBED FOUNDATION, AT L DIRECTION
0.110
ksi
SHEAR STRESS OF RIBBED FOUNDATION, AT B DIRECTION
FOR CENTER LIFT
FOR CENTER LIFT
v = V B / (n h b) =
0.078
<
ksi
vc
v = V L / (n h b) =
0.065
ksi
[Satisfactory]
<
vc
[Satisfactory]
FOR EDGE LIFT
FOR EDGE LIFT
v = V B / (n h b) =
0.047
<
ksi
vc
v = V L / (n h b) =
0.052
ksi
[Satisfactory]
<
vc
[Satisfactory]
8. CHECK SOIL BEARING

8.1 APPLIED LOADING
SLAB WEIGHT
150 L B t
1281250
lbs
BEAM BEARING AREA
ADDED DL
DL L B
1025000
lbs
SOIL PRESSURE
(b)(Total Length) = 3028.333333 ft2

psf
1893
q = Total Load / THE AREA =
LIVE LOAD
LL L B
2562500
lbs
<
BEAM WEIGHT
150 (h-t) b (Total Length)
708146
lbs
[Satisfactory]
PERIMETER LOAD
P (2L + 2B)
156060
lbs
qallow
9. CHECK SLAB STRESS DUE TO LOAD-BEARING PARTITIONS

Mmax = Pb / 4 =
2.03
= MIN[(Ec t3 / 3 ks)0.25, SB] =

lb / in3
ks =
4
Where
Mmax = Pb / 4 =
ft-kips / ft
30
ft
9.2 TENSILE STRESS AT L DIRECTION

2
f = - Mmax / 2 t =
2.03
ft-kips / ft
= MIN[(Ec t3 / 3 ks)0.25, SL] =

lb / in3
ks =
4
TENSILE STRESS AT B DIRECTION

-0.041
>
Where
f t,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
1. "Design of Slabs on Grade, ACI Committee 360", American Concrete Institute, 1997.
2. "Design and Construction of Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Ground, Second Edition", The Post-Tensioning Institute, 2004.
3. "1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2", International Conference of Building Officials, 1997.
f = - Mmax / 2 t =
-0.041
>
f t,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
30
ft
Tian Li
Daniel
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Design of Conventional Slabs on Compressible Soil Grade Based on ACI 360

qallow
EXPECTED SETTLEMENT BY GEOTECHICAL ENR
=
=
2000
psf
0.75
in
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
164
ft
125
ft
=
=
=
=
@

SLAB LENGTH
SLAB WIDTH
SLAB THICHNESS
PERIMETER LOADING
Pb
ADDED DEAD LOAD
DL
LIVE LOAD
LL
SL
SB
b
f'c
CONCRETE STRENGTH
SLAB REINFORCEMENT
in
270
plf
270
plf
50
psf
125
psf
30
ft
30
ft
24
in
20
in
ksi
18
in o.c., with
1.5
in clear from top of slab, each way.

2. DETERMINE SECTION PROPERTIES

L DIRECTION
n
B DIRECTION
=
As
338782
in4
yb
18.80
in
As
22
St
65100
in3
Es / Ec =
Sb
18024
in3
in
17
Es / Ec =
18.58
CGS
21.75
in
10090
in2
in2
18.58
CGS
22.25
in
12906
in2
in4
406345
yb
19.05
in
St
82096
in3
Sb
21330
in3

L DIRECTION
B DIRECTION
McsL = ( / nsL)0.5 MnsL =

Where
0.83
ft-kips / ft
MnsL = h1.35 SB0.36 / 80 L0.12 P0.10 =
0.96
nsL = L1.28 SB0.80 / 133 h0.28 P0.62 =
1.00
McsS = McsL (970-h) / 880 =
0.90
nsL = L1.28 SB0.80 / 133 h0.28 P0.62 =
0.70
ft-kips / ft
ft-kips / ft

f t,allow = - 6 (f c')0.5 =
-0.329
ksi
f c,allow = - 0.45 f c' =
1.350
ksi

f = M L / St =
0.019
Then

f = M B / St =
ksi
>
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
f = - M L / Sb =
-0.069
Then
Then
0.021
f = - M B / Sb =
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]
ksi
>
ksi
>
-0.083
Then
ksi
>
f t,allow
[Satisfactory]
<
f c,allow
[Satisfactory]

= (Ec I nsL / Es )1/4 / 12 =
13.571

= (Ec I nsB / Es )1/4 / 12 =
ft
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (f c')0.5 =
Where
Es =
1561009
1000
I =
338782
psi
psi, soil
Es =
in4
I =

allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
Where
0.51
1920
5.3 DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING
<
1000
406345
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
0.49
1920
Where
0.25
ft
1561009
psi
psi, soil
in4
in
cs = en0{1.78 - 0.103 h -1.65E-03 P + 3.95E-07 P P) =
13.020
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (f c')0.5 =
Where
in
DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING

cs = en0{1.78 - 0.103 h -1.65E-03 P + 3.95E-07 P P) =
in
0.25
<
allow
[Satisfactory]
in
allow
[Satisfactory]

VcsL = ( / nsL)0.30 VnsL =
0.90
VnsL = h
Where
(PSB)
0.30
kips/ft
0.260
0.10
/ 550 L
VcsS = VcsL (116-h) / 94 =

0.284

v c = 2 (f c')
0.5
0.110
v c = 2 (f c')
0.010
ksi
kips/ft
ksi

v = V B / (n h b) =
0.255
kips/ft
0.5
0.110
ksi
<
[Satisfactory]
vc
v = V L / (n h b) =
0.015
ksi
<
[Satisfactory]
vc
(cont'd)

7.1 APPLIED LOADING
SLAB WEIGHT
150 L B t
1281250
lbs
BEAM BEARING AREA
ADDED DL
DL L B
1025000
lbs
SOIL PRESSURE
(b)(Total Length) =
2982
1923
LIVE LOAD
LL L B
2562500
lbs
<
BEAM WEIGHT
708146
lbs
[Satisfactory]
PERIMETER LOAD
P (2L + 2B)
156060
lbs
ft2
psf
qallow

Mmax = Pb / 4 =
Where
2.03
= MIN[(Ec h3 / 3 ks)0.25, SB] =
ks =
lb / in3

f = - Mmax / 2 t2 =
30.000
ft
Where
2.03
ft-kips / ft
= MIN[(Ec h3 / 3 ks)0.25, SB] =
ks =
lb / in3

-0.041
>
Mmax = Pb / 4 =
ft-kips / ft
f t,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
f = - Mmax / 2 t2 =
-0.041
>
f t,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
30.000
ft
Tian Li
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Design of PT Slabs on Expansive Soil Ground Based on Specification of PTI

1. DESIGN METHODS
1.1 DIVIDE AN IRREGULAR FOUNDATION PLAN INTO OVERLAPPING RECTANGLES AND USING
THIS SPREADSHEET DESIGN EACH RECTANGULAR SECTION SEPARATELY.

qallow
EDGE MOISTURE VARIATION DISTANCE
em
DIFFERENTIAL SOIL MOVEMENT
=
=
=
=
=
=
ym
SLAB-SUBGRADE FRICTION COEFFICIENT
2700
5.5
2.5
psf
ft, for center lift
ft, for edge lift
3.608
in, for center lift
0.752
in, for edge lift
0.75

SLAB LENGTH
SLAB WIDTH
SLAB THICHNESS
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
PERIMETER LOADING
Pb
ADDED DEAD LOAD
DL
LIVE LOAD
LL
SL
SB
CONCRETE STRENGTH
f'c
SLAB PRESTRESSING TENDONS, L DIRECTION
SLAB PRESTRESSING TENDONS, B DIRECTION
TENDON IN THE BOTTOM OF EACH BEAM

EFFECTIVE PRESTRESS AFTER ALL LOSSES EXCEPT SG
42
tendons w/
tendons w/
ft
in
1040
plf
2700
plf
15
psf
40
psf
14
ft
12
ft
24
in
10
in
2.5
ksi
SUGGESTED RATIO OF EXPECTED ELONGATION IS 0.00777
0.153
in2 at each tendon.
CONVERTED UNIFORM THICKNESS IS 6.48 inch
0.153
in2 at each tendon.
tendons w/
174
fe
ft
24
in2 (only for edge lift governing required)

ksi
3. ASSUME A TRIAL SECTION

3.1 ASSUME BEAM DEPTH AND SPACING
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT L DIRECTION
allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
=
=
Where
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT B DIRECTION
1.40
in
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
ft
Where
360
2.5
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT L DIRECTION

allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
=
=
Where
C
h = [(ym L)
1.059
SB
0.523
0.70
in
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
ft
Where
h = [L
0.88
SB
em0.74
ym0.76
/ 380 allow ]
0.40
in
ft
14.28
in
h = [(ym B)
0.205
1.059
SL
0.523
720
em1.296
/ 380 allow ]0.824 =
23.57
in
4.52
in
BEAM DEPTH, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT B DIRECTION

0.01 1.176
/ 15.9 allow P
GOVERNING h =
ft
BEAM DEPTH, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT B DIRECTION

0.824
BEAM DEPTH, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT L DIRECTION

0.35
in
8
360
=
=
720
em1.296
0.80
ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION, FOR EDGE LIFT, AT B DIRECTION
BEAM DEPTH, FOR CENTER LIFT, AT L DIRECTION

0.205
=
=
23.57
2.51
in
<
in
0.35
h = [B
ACTUAL h =
0.88
SL
24.00
em0.74
ym0.76
0.01 1.176
/ 15.9 allow P
in
[Satisfactory]
3.2 DETERMINE SECTION PROPERTIES

L DIRECTION
B DIRECTION
yb
17.89
in
1752
yb
18.59
in
in2
St
12824
in3
2816
in2
St
20674
in3
CGS
78347
in4
Sb
4379
in3
111827
in4
Sb
6015
in3
22.00
in
4.11
in
CGS
22.00
in
3.41
in

4.1 CENTER LIFT MOMENT AT L DIRECTION
ML = A0 (B em1.238 + C) =
CENTER LIFT MOMENT AT B DIRECTION
11.51
ft-kips / ft
MB = (58 + em) ML / 60, for L /B > 1.1
A0 = (L0.013 SB0.306 h0.688 P0.534 ym0.193) / 727 =
Where
B = 1, for em < 5
B = MIN[(ym - 1) / 3, 1], for em > 5
MB = ML, for L /B < 1.1
1.439
12.18
ft-kips / ft
3.01
ft-kips / ft
150.89
kips
0.87
C = 0, for em < 5
C = MAX{[8 - (P - 613) / 255] (4 - ym) / 3], 0}, for em > 5

4.2 EDGE LIFT MOMENT AT L DIRECTION
0.83
EDGE LIFT MOMENT AT B DIRECTION
ML = SB0.10 (h em)0.78 ym0.66 / (7.2 L0.0065 P0.04) =
2.66
ft-kips / ft
MB = h0.35 (19 + em) ML / 57.75, for L /B > 1.1

MB = ML, for L /B < 1.1

ft,allow = - 6 (fc')0.5 =
-0.300
ksi
fc,allow = - 0.45 fc' =
1.125
ksi

f= Pr / A - ML / St + Pr e / St =
Where
-0.172
Pr = Pe - SG =
Pe = fe Aps =
SG = W slab / 2000 =
Then
>
<
f = Pr / A - MB / St + Pr e / St =
97.65
133.11
ksi
kips
Where
kips
Pe = fe Aps =
35.46
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
-0.219
ksi
186.35
kips / ft
Pr = Pe - SG =
SG = W slab / 2000 =
kips
Then
>
<
35.46
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
kips

f = Pr / A + ML / Sb - Pr e / Sb =
Then
>
<
0.721
ksi
f = Pr / A + MB / Sb - Pr e / Sb =
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
Then
5.4 TOP STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT L DIRECTION

f = Pr / A - ML / Sb - Pr e / Sb =
Then
>
<
-0.211
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
Then
5.5 BOTTOM STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT L DIRECTION

0.147
>
ft,allow
<
fc,allow
Then
= (Ec I / Es)1/4 / 12 =
8.566
1000
Then
[Satisfactory]
ksi
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
>
<
0.152
ksi
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
= (Ec I / Es)1/4 / 12 =
ft
1425000
psi
Where
psi
9.363
ft
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (fc')0.5 =

Es =
1000
1425000
psi
psi
FOR CENTER LIFT
FOR CENTER LIFT
allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
1.40
in
360
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
0.80
360
allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
0.40
720
Where
FOR EDGE LIFT
in
FOR EDGE LIFT
allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
Where
>
<
-0.284
Where
[Satisfactory]
f = Pr / A + MB / St + Pr e / St =
[Satisfactory]
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (fc')0.5 =

Es =
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
BOTTOM STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT B DIRECTION
ksi

Where
ft,allow
f = Pr / A - MB / Sb - Pr e / Sb =
fc,allow
ksi
TOP STRESS, FOR EDGE LIFT MOMENT, AT B DIRECTION
ksi
ft,allow
f= Pr / A + ML / St + Pr e / St =
>
<
0.989
0.70
in
720
Where
6.3 EXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING
0 = (ym L)0.205 SB1.059 P0.523 em1.296 / (380 h1.214) =
0.74
0 = (ym B)0.205 SL1.059 P0.523 em1.296 / (380 h1.214) =
in

0.21
0.026
p = Pe e 2 / (2 Ec I) =
in
0.025
1.965
kips/ft
1.681
kips/ft
>
50 psi
in
COMPARE EXPECTED TO ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION
<
in
allow
0 - p =
0.76
<
in
[Satisfactory]
allow
[Satisfactory]

0.23
0.19
DEFLECTION CAUSED BY PRESTRESSING AT B DIRECTION
in
6.5 COMPARE EXPECTED TO ALLOWABLE DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION
0 + p =
in
0 = B0.35 ym0.76 SL0.88 em0.74 / (15.9 h0.85 P0.01) =
in
6.4 DEFLECTION CAUSED BY PRESTRESSING AT L DIRECTION
0.72
0.78
0 = L0.35 ym0.76 SB0.88 em0.74 / (15.9 h0.85 P0.01) =
0 - p =
in
EXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING
p = Pe e 2 / (2 Ec I) =
<
in
allow
0 + p =
0.22
<
in
[Satisfactory]
allow
[Satisfactory]

FOR CENTER LIFT
FOR CENTER LIFT
VL = L0.09 SB0.71 h0.43 P0.44 ym0.16 em0.93 / 1940 =
2.105
VB = B0.19 SL0.45 h0.20 P0.54 ym0.04 em0.97 / 1350 =
kips/ft
FOR EDGE LIFT
FOR EDGE LIFT
VL = L0.07 h0.4 P0.03 ym0.67 em0.16 / (3.0 SB0.015) =
1.752
VB = B0.07 h0.4 P0.03 ym0.67 em0.16 / (3.0 SL0.015) =
kips/ft

vc = 1.7 (fc')0.5 + 0.2 fp =
0.096
ksi
Where
0.056
ksi
fp =
>
50 psi
vc = 1.7 (fc')0.5 + 0.2 fp =
0.096
ksi
Where
0.054
ksi
fp =
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
FOR CENTER LIFT
FOR CENTER LIFT
v = V B / (n h b) =
0.070
<
ksi
vc
v = V L / (n h b) =
0.086
ksi
[Satisfactory]
<
vc
[Satisfactory]
FOR EDGE LIFT
FOR EDGE LIFT
v = V B / (n h b) =
0.058
<
ksi
vc
v = V L / (n h b) =
0.074
ksi
[Satisfactory]
<
vc
[Satisfactory]

8.1 APPLIED LOADING
SLAB WEIGHT
150 L B t
50400
lbs
BEAM BEARING AREA
ADDED DL
DL L B
15120
lbs
SOIL PRESSURE
LIVE LOAD
LL L B
40320
lbs
<
BEAM WEIGHT
44167
lbs
[Satisfactory]
PERIMETER LOAD
P (2L + 2B)
137280
lbs
(b)(Total Length) =
175
1642
ft2
psf
qallow

Mmax = Pb / 4 =
Where
8.10
= MIN[(Ec t3 / 3 ks)0.25, SB] =
ks =
lb / in
12
3

f = Pr / A - Mmax / 2 t2 =
ft
Where
9.45
ft-kips / ft
= MIN[(Ec t3 / 3 ks)0.25, SL] =
ks =
lb / in3

-0.197
>
Mmax = Pb / 4 =
ft-kips / ft
ft,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
f = Pr / A - Mmax / 2 t2 =
>
-0.242
ft,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
14
ft
10. CONVERT UNIFORM THICKNESS

H= MAX[ ( I / L)1/3, ( I / B)1/3 ] =
6.48
in
11. SUGGEST RATIO OF EXPECTED ELONGATION

r = fe / 0.8 Eps =
Where
7.77E-03
Eps =
28000
ksi
1. "Design and Construction of Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Ground, Second Edition", The Post-Tensioning Institute, 2004.
2. "1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2", International Conference of Building Officials, 1997.
Tian Li
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Design of PT Slabs on Compressible Soil Ground Based on Specification of PTI

qallow
EXPECTED SETTLEMENT BY GEOTECHICAL ENR

SLAB-SUBGRADE FRICTION COEFFICIENT
=
=
=
1500
psf
0.75
in
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
40
0.75

SLAB LENGTH
SLAB WIDTH
SLAB THICHNESS
PERIMETER LOADING
Pb
ADDED DEAD LOAD
DL
LIVE LOAD
LL
SL
SB
b
f'c
CONCRETE STRENGTH
ft
38
ft
in
840
plf
2700
plf
15
psf
40
psf
13.333
ft
12.667
ft
24
in
10
in
ksi
SLAB PRESTRESSING TENDONS, L DIRECTION
tendons w/
0.153
in2 at each tendon.
SLAB PRESTRESSING TENDONS, B DIRECTION
tendons w/
0.153
in2 at each tendon.
SUGGESTED RATIO OF EXPECTED ELONGATION IS 0.00777
TENDON IN THE BOTTOM OF EACH BEAM

EFFECTIVE PRESTRESS AFTER ALL LOSSES EXCEPT SG
tendons w/
in
174
ksi
fe
CONVERTED UNIFORM THICKNESS IS 6.21 inch
2. DETERMINE SECTION PROPERTIES

L DIRECTION
B DIRECTION
yb
18.34
in
yb
18.47
in2
St
19294
in3
2720
in2
St
19992
in3
109177
in4
Sb
5952
in3
110544
in4
Sb
5985
in3
22.00
in
3.66
in
CGS
22.00
in
3.53
in
McsS = McsL (970-h) / 880 =
3.44
ft-kips / ft
nsL = L1.28 SB0.80 / 133 h0.28 P0.62 =
0.04
2624
CGS
in

L DIRECTION
B DIRECTION
McsL = ( / nsL)0.5 MnsL =

Where
3.20
ft-kips / ft
MnsL = h1.35 SB0.36 / 80 L0.12 P0.10 =
0.75
nsL = L1.28 SB0.80 / 133 h0.28 P0.62 =
0.04
ft-kips / ft

ft,allow = - 6 (fc')0.5 =
-0.329
ksi
fc,allow = - 0.45 fc' =
1.350
ksi

f = Pr / A + ML / St + Pr e / St =
0.168
Pr = Pe - SG =
Where
Pe = fe Aps =
>
<
kips
Pe = fe Aps =
51.83
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
f = Pr / A - ML / Sb - Pr e / Sb =
Then
>
<
-0.283
Then
>
<
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
213
kips
161.14
51.83
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]
kips
kips

f = Pr / A - MB / Sb - Pr e / Sb =
ksi
ksi
SG = W slab / 2000 =
kips
0.170
Pr = Pe - SG =
Where
kips
SG = W slab / 2000 =
Then
f = Pr / A + MB / St + Pr e / St =
161.14
213
ksi
Then
>
<
-0.312
ksi
ft,allow
[Satisfactory]
fc,allow
[Satisfactory]

= (Ec I nsL / Es )1/4 / 12 =
Where
4.595
0.5
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (fc')

Es =
I =

= (Ec I nsB / Es )1/4 / 12 =
ft
1561009
psi
psi
Es =
109177
in4
I =
Where
5.3 DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING

0.12
<
[Satisfactory]
ft
1000
psi
110544
in4
1561009
psi
0.12
in

allow = 12 MIN(B, 6) / C =
0.17
in
1920
cs = en0{1.78 - 0.103 h -1.65E-03 P + 3.95E-07 P P) =
4.581
Ec = (0.5) 57000 (fc')0.5 =
1000

allow = 12 MIN(L, 6) / C =
0.17
in
Where
Where
1920
DIFFERENTIAL DEFLECTION WITHOUT PRESTRESSING

in
allow
cs = en0{1.78 - 0.103 h -1.65E-03 P + 3.95E-07 P P) =
<
[Satisfactory]
allow

VcsL = ( / nsL)0.30 VnsL =
Where
0.850
kips/ft
VcsS = VcsL (116-h) / 94 =
VnsL = h0.90 (PSB)0.30 / 550 L0.10 =
0.355

v c = 1.7 (fc')0.5 + 0.2 fp =
fp =
Where
0.105
ksi
0.061
ksi
0.832
>
50 psi
v c = 1.7 (fc')0.5 + 0.2 fp =
0.105
ksi
fp =
0.059
ksi
Where
[Satisfactory]
0.034
>
50 psi
[Satisfactory]

v = V B / (n h b) =
kips/ft
kips/ft
<
ksi
vc
v = V L / (n h b) =
0.035
ksi
[Satisfactory]
<
vc
[Satisfactory]

7.1 APPLIED LOADING
SLAB WEIGHT
150 L B t
76000
lbs
BEAM BEARING AREA
ADDED DL
DL L B
22800
lbs
SOIL PRESSURE
LIVE LOAD
LL L B
60800
lbs
<
BEAM WEIGHT
62222
lbs
[Satisfactory]
PERIMETER LOAD
P (2L + 2B)
131040
lbs
(b)(Total Length) =
249
1418
ft2
psf
qallow

Mmax = Pb / 4 =
Where
8.55
= MIN[(Ec h3 / 3 ks)0.25, SB] =
ks =
lb / in
12.667
3

f = Pr / A - Mmax / 2 t2 =
ft,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
9. CONVERT UNIFORM THICKNESS

H= MAX[ ( I / L)1/3, ( I / B)1/3 ] =
6.21
in
10. SUGGEST RATIO OF EXPECTED ELONGATION

r = fe / 0.8 Eps =
Where
7.77E-03
Eps =
ft
Where
9.00
ft-kips / ft
= MIN[(Ec h3 / 3 ks)0.25, SB] =
ks =
lb / in3

-0.206
>
Mmax = Pb / 4 =
ft-kips / ft
28000
ksi
f = Pr / A - Mmax / 2 t2 =
>
-0.206
ft,allow
ksi
[Satisfactory]
13.333
ft
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Drilled Cast-in-place Pile Design Based on ACI 318-02

DESIGN CRITERIA
1.
SEND TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER THE BASE FORCES OF COLUMNS AND THE PERMISSIBLE DEFLECTION AT TOP PILE.
(PERMISSIBLE DEFLECTION 0.25 in SUGGESTED)
2.
ASSUME FIX HEAD CONDITION IF Ldh & Lhk COMPLY WITH THE TENSION DEVELOPMEMNT.
3.
FROM SOIL REPORT, DETERMINE PILE PATTERN, LENGTH, AND MAX SECTION FORCES OF SINGLE PILE, Pu, Mu, & Vu.
3.
PILE CAPS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED BY TIES WITH SDS/10 TIMES AXIAL CAPACITY OF VERT COLUMN LOADING.
(IBC 1808.2.23.1)

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
ksi
VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS

PILE DIAMETER
PILE LENGTH
fy
D
L
=
=
=
60
20
35
ksi
in
ft
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD
Pu
480
FACTORED MOMENT LOAD
Mu
200
ft-k
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD

PILE VERT. REINF.
PILE SPIRAL REINF.
Vu
8
3
=
#
@
( L dh =
in
&
20 k
7
3
in o.c.
( 1.5 in o.c. at each end.)
L hk =
14
in )
THE PILE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
ANALYSIS
CHECK PILE LIMITATIONS
fc' =
ksi
D=
20
in
>
>
[Satisfactory]
(IBC 1810.1.1)
MAX( L / 30 , 12 in) [Satisfactory]
2.5
ksi
(IBC 1810.3.2)
CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY
o =
f
20
2 0.85 f
'
C
Ec
, E c = 57
'
C
c c
o
o
0.85 f
'
C
for c o
f y ,
for s > y
, E s = 29000ksi
0.85 f
s E s , for s y
'
C
for 0 < c < o
(cont'd)
1200
Pn (kips)
954
954
699
571
464
304
Mn (ft-kips)
0
75
172
197
205
203
297
82
205
189
AT FLEXURE ONLY
144
AT TENSION ONLY
-259
1000
AT COMPRESSION ONLY
AT MAXIMUM LOAD
AT 0 % TENSION
AT 25 % TENSION
AT 50 % TENSION
AT t = 0.002
800
600
Pn (k)
400
200
AT BALANCED CONDITION
AT t = 0.005
0
-200
50
100
150
200
250
-400
Mn (ft-k)
Pmax =0.85 [ 0.85 fc' (Ag - Ast) + fy Ast] =
where
Ast =
Pu
Cb = d c / ( c + s) =
=
144
Mn =
ft-kips @ Pu =
204
10
in
16.2 in, (ACI 7.7.1)
Mn = 0.9 n =
t =
0.002069
1 =
0.8
ft-kips @ Pn = 0, (ACI 318-02, Sec. 9.3.2) ,&

480
0.08 (ACI 318-02, Section 10.9)
min
0.005 (IBC, Section 1810.1.1.2)
provd
c =
0.003
( ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.2.7.3 )
t,max = 0.004, (ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.3.5)
>
kips
max
Mu
[Satisfactory]
0.015
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY
Vn = (Vs + Vc) =
=
where
57
kips, (ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.1.1)
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
0.75 (ACI 318-02 Sec. 9.3.2.3)
A0 =
2
206 in .
Vc =
2 (fc')0.5A0 =
Vs =
MIN (d fy Av / s , 4Vc) =
Av =
29.1
0.22
in2.
fy =
40
ksi
in
kips, (ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.3.1)

47.5
smax
(ACI 318-02, Section 7.10.4.3)
smin
(ACI 318-02, Section 7.10.4.3)
kips, (ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.5.6.2)

sprovd
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE FIX HEAD CONDITION
L dh = MAX
L hk
where
[Satisfactory]
in2.
(ACI 318-02, Fig. R9.3.2)
0.709
4.80
in (at balanced strain condition, ACI 10.3.2)
= 0.57 + 67 t =
where
>
2
314 in .
Ag =
a = Cb 1 =
953.65 kips., (at max axial load, ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.3.6.1)
0.70 (ACI 318-02, Sec.9.3.2.2)
requird 0.02 d b f y
, 8d b , 6 in =
'
provided
fc
=
14
db
required / provided
=
10 db
8
in
(ACI 318-02 12.5.2)
in, (ACI 318-02, Fig. R12.5)

0.88 in
=
0.8
( A s,reqd / A s,provd , ACI 318, 12.2.5)
1.0 (ACI 318-02 12.2.4)
=
=
=
=
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.4
Ktr
(c + Ktr ) / db =
(1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-02 12.2.4)

(0.8 for # 6 or smaller, 1.0 for other)
(normal weight)
in, min(d' , 0.5s), (ACI 318-02, 12.2.4)
(Atr fyt / 1500 s n) =
(ACI 318-02, 12.2.4)
2.5 < 2.5 , (ACI 318-02, 12.2.3)

0.7 (#11 or smaller, cover > 2.5" & side >2.0", ACI 318-02 12.5.3)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Design of Footing at Piping Based on ACI 318-02

COLUMN WIDTH
c1
in
COLUMN DEPTH
c2
in
BASE PLATE WIDTH
b1
16
in
BASE PLATE DEPTH
b2
16
in
fc'
2.5
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
AXIAL DEAD LOAD
PDL
40
AXIAL LIVE LOAD
PLL
25

PLAT
SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD
=
=
1
20
Seismic,SD
k, SD
SEISMIC MOMENT LOAD
MLAT
96
ft-k, SD
SEISMIC SHEAR LOAD
VLAT
k, SD
SURCHARGE
qs
0.1
ksf
SOIL WEIGHT
ws
0.11
kcf
Df
ft
FOOTING MIDDLE THICKNESS

SOIL COVER THICKNESS
T
D
=
=
18
12
in
in
Qa
ksf
=
#
7
5
ft
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE

SQUARE FOOTING LENGTH
REINFORCING SIZE
MIDDLE BOTTOM EACH WAY :
9 # 5 @ 9 in o.c.
ANALYSIS
CASE 1:
DL + LL
P
=
65
M
=
0
CASE 2:
DL + LL + E / 1.4
P
=
79
M
=
69
CASE 3:
0.9 DL + E / 1.4
P
=
50
M
=
69
MR / MO =
6.4
Where MO =
>
kips
ft-kips
kips
ft-kips
kips
ft-kips
F = 1 / (0.9x1.4)
MLAT + VLAT Df - 0.5 PLAT L =
[Satisfactory]
32
k-ft
Pconc = (0.15 kcf) L2 [T + 2 (Df - D - T) /3] = 13.48

Psoil =
ws D L2 =
MR =
0.5 PDLL + 0.5 (Pconc + Psoil) L =
5.39
k, footing wt
k, soil weight
206
k-ft

Service Loads
P
qs L2
P conc - soil
P
M
CASE 1
65.0
CASE 2
79.3
CASE 3
50.3
4.9
4.9
0.0
k, (surcharge load)
3.6
73.5
0.0
3.6
87.8
68.6
3.2
53.5
68.6
k
ft - k
2.250 > 0
1.441 > 0
0.393 > 0
ksf, net pressure
q3
2.250
2.272
1.223
ksf, net pressure
q2
2.250
3.102
2.054
ksf, net pressure
qmax
2.250
3.933
2.884
ksf, net pressure
qallow
3.0
4.0
4.0
ksf
qmin
(cont'd)
Where
q max = 0.5
q min = 0.5
3 P
2
L
3 P
L
2
1
q 2 = q max + q min
3
3
1
2
q 3 = q max + q min
3
3
162 M
3
13 L
162 M
13L
[Satisfactory]
DESIGN FLEXURE & CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.3.5, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, 12.5, 15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)
18
Service Loads
V
M
MAX =
CASE 1
36.7
69.7
0.85 1 f 'c
fy
CASE 2
57.5
111.6
u
u +t
CASE 3
40.3
79.1
'
0.85 f c 1 1
k, flexure shear
ft - k, flexure moment
Mu
0.383b d 2 f c'
MIN = MIN 0.0018
fy
T
4
,
d
3
DESIGN FLEXURE
Location
Mu,max = 1.5 M
Middle Bottom Each Way 167.3 ft-k
d (in)
14.69
min
reqD
max
0.0022 0.0021 0.0129
smax
18
use
9 # 5 @ 9 in o.c.
provD
0.0023
[Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR

Vu,max = 1.5 V
Direction
Pipe Direction
86.2
Vc = 2 b d (fc')0.5
93
check Vu < Vc
[Satisfactory]
P u R 0.5 v M ub1
+
J
AP
2
3
d b1
d
b2
1+
+3
6
b1
b1
A P = 2 ( b1 + b 2 ) d
1
v = 1
2 b1
1+
3 b2
2 2
Af = L
3
vu ( psi ) =
J =
R=0
Case
1
2
3
where
Pu
97.5
118.9
75.4
Mu
0.0
102.9
102.9
Pu
Mu
=
=
=
b1
25.2
25.2
25.2
b2
25.2
25.2
25.2
b0
100.8
100.8
100.8
v
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

1.5 Pcol
1.5 Mcol
c
1.0
1.0
1.0
f 'c
v c( psi ) = ( 2 + y )
y = MIN 2,
b0 =
y
2.0
2.0
2.0
, 40
d
b0
AP
, b1 = ( 0.5c1 + 0.5b1 + d ) , b 2 = ( 0.5c 2 + 0.5b 2 + d )
d
Af
32.7
32.7
32.7
Ap
10.3
10.3
10.3
R
0.0
0.0
0.0
J
8.2
8.2
8.2
vu (psi)
65.9
117.0
87.6
vc
150.0
150.0
150.0
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Special Moment Resisting Frame Based on ACI 318-02
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
10.17
D =
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc' =
ksi
DISTRIBUTED UNFACTED LOADS
REBAR YIELD STRESS

BEAM LENGTH BET. COL. CENTERS
BEAM SIZE
fy
L
b
h
c1
60
25
24
36
36
ksi
ft
in
in
in
L =
0.6
kips / ft
SECTION MOMENTS & SHEARS AT FACE OF COL. (ft-kips, kips)
MA
VA
MB
VB
D
-130
45
-180
-45
L
-25
7
-25
-7
24
in
COLUMN SIZE
=
=
=
=
=
c2 =
SDS =
=
SEISMIC PARAMETER
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING
SECTION
TOP
9
(d =
BOTTOM
A
#
33.31
( 1 Layer)
5
#
( d = 33.31
( 1 Layer)
QE
B
#
33.31
( 1 Layer)
5
#
( d = 33.31
( 1 Layer)
3
(d =
9
in )
61
-665
kips / ft
-61
0.44
1.15
MID SPAN
#
9
33.31 in )
( 1 Layer)
5
#
9
( d = 33.31 in )
( 1 Layer)
9
in )
665
4.1
9
(d =
9
in )
9
in )
HOOP & STIRRUP LOCATIONS (ACI 21.3.3)

AT END, S1
LOCATION
LENGTH
72
in
TYPE
BAR
SPACING
AT MID, S2
AT SPLICE, S3
120
in
48
in
0.5
(L-4h-c1)
( 2h )
1.3 MAX{0.075fydb/[(fc') (c+Ktr)/db], 12}
Hoops
Stirrups
Hoops
5 Legs # 5
3 Legs # 5
5 Legs # 5
@ 8 in o.c.
@ 16 in o.c.
@ 4 in o.c.
MIN(d/4, 8db, 24dt, 12)
( d/2 )
MIN(d/4, 4)
THE BEAM DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS
U = (1.2+0.2SDS)D + QE + 1.0L
(ACI 9-5)
AT SECTION A, FACE OF COLUMN
Vu =
135.1
kips
Mu =
572.3
ft-kips
or
AT SECTION B, FACE OF COLUMN

-5.2
kips
or
-957.2 ft-kips
AT MIDDLE OF THE SPAN
106.7
kips
Mu =
659.2
ft-kips
Vu =
0.0
kips
or
0.0
131.1
ft-kips
or
131.1
or
-33.6
kips
Vu =
65.2
Mu =
-196.0
kips
or
5.2
or
507.9
ft-kips
kips
kips
ft-kips
or
-870.3 ft-kips
U = 1.2D + 1.6L
(ACI 9-2)
-135.1
-1021.6 ft-kips
Mu =
U = (0.9-0.2SDS)D + QE
(ACI 9-7)
Vu =
Vu =
Mu =
Vu =
-106.7
kips
or
33.6
kips
Mu =
-910.9
ft-kips
or
618.6
ft-kips
Vu =
0.0
kips
or
0.0
Mu =
75.6
ft-kips
or
75.6
kips
Vu =
0.0
ft-kips
Mu =
129.8
kips
ft-kips
kips
Vu =
-65.2
kips
ft-kips
Mu =
-256.0
ft-kips
cont'd
CHECK SECTION REQUIREMENTS (ACI 21.3.1)
Pu < 0.1Agfc'
[Satisfactory]
Lu=L-c1 =
22.00
b/h=
b =
0.67
24
>
ft
>
0.3
>
<
in
4d=
11.10
[Satisfactory]
10
in
c2+1.5h =
78
ft
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
in
CHECK FLEXURAL REQUIREMENTS

(ACI 21.3.2.1)
(ACI 21.3.2.2)
top =
0.011
bot =
0.006
Mn,bot
>
>
<
>
<
min=MIN[3(fc')0.5/fy, 200/fy ]=
0.003
max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
max =
0.025
[Satisfactory]
(1/2)Mn,top
[Satisfactory]
772
ft-kips

=
0.9
1301
ft-kips
where
2
2
(ACI 21.3.2.1)
top =
bot =
(ACI 21.3.2.2)

(ACI 21.3.2.1)
top =
bot =
(ACI 21.3.2.2)
0.006
>
Mn,bot
where
min =
max =
min =
max =
(1/2)Mn,top
0.003
[Satisfactory]
0.025
[Satisfactory]
0.003
[Satisfactory]
0.025
[Satisfactory]
772
ft-kips
1301
ft-kips
>
<
>
<
0.004
0.006
>
>
Mn,bot
min =
max =
min =
max =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
0.025
[Satisfactory]
0.003
[Satisfactory]
0.025
[Satisfactory]
(1/4)Mn,max
[Satisfactory]
(1/4)Mn,max
[Satisfactory]
478
ft-kips
772
ft-kips
2
2
Mn,max =
1301
CHECK SHEAR STRENGTH (ACI 21.3.4)

FOR SEISMIC LOAD ACTING TO THE LEFT
Ve = (Mpr, A, top + Mpr, B,bot) / Ln + VgL =
178.7
Ve - dwu = 162.4
Ve - (2h + d)wu =
where
<
kips
127.1
0.5
Vc = 2(fc') bd =
<
0.0
<
290.4
8(fc')0.5bd =
kips
[2(fc')0.5bd + Avfyd/s2 ] =
kips, (Per ACI 21.3.4.2, Vc = 0, if (Ve -VgL)

1564
ft-kips
Mpr, B ,bot = bot bd2fy (1.25 - 0.919bot fy/fc') =
945
ft-kips
22.0
wu = (1.2+0.2SSD)D+1.0L =
VgL = wuLn / 2 =
=
0.75
5.9
kips
Ve - (2h - d)wu =
110.8
kips
0.93
178.7
<
Ve - dwu = 162.4
[Satisfactory]
>
>
Mu /
[Satisfactory]
Mu /
[Satisfactory]
>
>
Mu /
[Satisfactory]
Mu /
[Satisfactory]
262.7
kips
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
152.8
kips
[Satisfactory]
50% Ve AND Pu < Ag fc' / 20 )
kips / ft, (for CBC, only D + L, without factor)
64.7
kips
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
in2 @ end ,
Ve = (Mpr, A, bot + Mpr, B,top) / Ln + VgL =
[Satisfactory]
Mu /
ft
Av =
1.55
FOR SEISMIC LOAD ACTING TO THE RIGHT
where
kips
2
Mpr, A, top = top bd fy (1.25 - 0.919top fy/fc') =
Ln = L - c1 =
Mu /
ft-kips
[Vc + Avfyd/s1 ] =
kips
>
>
[Satisfactory]
Mn,top
where
>
<
>
<
0.011
[Satisfactory]
kips
[Vc + Avfyd/s1 ] =
<
in2 @ mid of beam
<
290.4
8(fc')0.5bd =
kips
[2(fc')0.5bd + Avfyd/s2 ] =
Mpr, A ,bot = bot bd fy (1.25 - 0.919bot fy/fc') =
945
ft-kips
Mpr, B, top = top bd2fy (1.25 - 0.919top fy/fc') =
1564
ft-kips
262.7
kips
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
152.8
kips
[Satisfactory]
1. Alan Williams: "Seismic and Wind Forces, Structural Design Examples", International Code Council, 2003.
2. SEAOC: "2000 IBC Structural/Seismic Design Manual - Volume 3", International Code Council, 2003.
3. S.K. Ghosh, Xuemei Liang: "Seismic and Wind Design of Concrete Buildings", Portland Cement Association, 2005.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc ' =
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy =
60
ksi
COLUMN CLEAR HEIGHT
Hn =
10.17
ft
COLUMN SIZE
c1 =
36
in
36
in
c2 =
SDS =
=
SEISMIC PARAMETER
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
0.44
1.15
SECTION MOMENTS & SHEARS AT END OF COL. (ft-kips, kips)

Mtop
Mbot
P
V
D
692
-4
-20
-2
L
87
-1
-1
-1
QE
900
93
SECTION
LEFT
6
(d =
TOP
#
8
33.38 in )
( 1 Layer)
6
#
8
( d = 33.38 in )
( 1 Layer)
20
#
8
( 8 # 8 at sides )
RIGHT
TOTAL
BARS
36
500
BOTTOM
#
8
33.38 in )
( 1 Layer)
6
#
8
( d = 33.38 in )
( 1 Layer)
20
#
8
( 8 # 8 at sides )
6
(d =
TRANSVERSE REINFORCMENT FOR CONFINEMENT (ACI 21.4.4 & 21.4.3)

LOCATION
AT END, Lo
AT MID
LENGTH
36
in
4 in + 4 in
AT SPLICE, S
43
in
1.3Max{(0.075)fydb/[(fc')0.5(c+Ktr)/db],12}
MAX( c1, Hn/16, 18)
Hoops
Hoops
Hoops
4 Legs # 5
4 Legs # 5
4 Legs # 5
@ 4 in o.c.
@ 6 in o.c.
@ 4 in o.c.
TYPE
BAR SIZE
SPACING
MIN{c1/4, 6db, MAX[MIN(4+(14-hx)/3, 6), 4]}
MIN( 6db, 6 )
Same as END Lo
THE COLUMN DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS
U = (1.2+0.2SDS)D + QE + 1.0L
Pu =
980.6
U = (0.9-0.2SDS)D + QE
(ACI 9-5)
(ACI 9-7)
kips
Mu,top =
1028.8
ft-kips
Pu =
564.2
kips
Mu,top =
1031.8
ft-kips
80.2
kips
Vu =
U = 1.2D + 1.6L
(ACI 9-2)
Mu,bot =
571.4
ft-kips
Vu =
90.7
kips
Mu,bot =
573.4
ft-kips
Pu =
969.6
kips
Mu,top =
-6.4
ft-kips
Vu =
-25.6
kips
Mu,bot =
-4.0
ft-kips
CHECK SECTION REQUIREMENTS (ACI 21.4.1)

Pu =
564.2
cmin =MIN(c1, c2) =

cmin / cmax =
>
kips
36
in
1.00
>
0.1Agfc' =
388.8
>
12
0.4
kips
[Satisfactory]
in
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TRANSVERSE REINFORCING AT END OF COLUMN (ACI 21.4.4)

in2
Ash =
1.24
>
MAX[ 0.09shcfc' / fyh , 0.3shc(Ag/Ach-1)fc' / fyh ] =
[Satisfactory]
where
0.73
s = MAX[MIN(c1/4, 6db, 4+(14-hx)/3, 6), 4] =

hc = c1 - 2Cover - dt =
Ach = (c1-3)(c2-3) =
1089.0
32.4
in
in2
CHECK FLEXURAL REINFORCING (ACI 21.4.3.1)

AT TOP SECTION
total = 0.013
>
min =
0.010
[Satisfactory]
in2
5
in
(cont'd)
total = 0.013
total = 0.026
AT BOTTOM SECTION
AT SPLICE SECTION
>
<
min =
max =
0.010
[Satisfactory]
0.060
( 0.030 should be used for lap splice existed.)
[Satisfactory]
CHECK CAPACITY SUBJECTED TO BENDING AND AXIAL LOAD
APPLIED LOADING (ACI 10.12.3)
LOADS
1
2
Pu (kips)
980.6
980.6
564.2
564.2
969.6
969.6
Mu (ft-kips)
1028.8
571.4
1031.8
573.4
6.4
4.0
ns = Cm/[1-Pu/(0.75Pc)]
1.018
1.018
1.011
1.011
1.018
1.018
nsMu (ft-kips)
Mn (ft-kips) @ Pu
1047.8
581.9
1042.6
579.4
6.5
4.1
1325.3
1566.8
1293.9
1564.8
1104.9
1103.0
EI = 0.4EcIg / (1+ d) = 0.25 EcIg
where
Pc = EI / (kLu)
SUMMARY OF LOAD VERSUS MOMENT CAPACITIES (ACI 10.2 & 10.3)

Pn (kips)
2191
2191
1959
1647
1392
1008
987
687
0
CAPACITY
AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY
AT MAXIMUM LOAD
AT 0 % TENSION
AT 25 % TENSION
AT 50 % TENSION
AT t = 0.002
AT t = 0.005
AT FLEXURE ONLY
Mn (ft-kips)
0
568
805
1028
1162
1307
1318
1651
1100
Pn (kips)
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Mn (ft-kips)
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
All load points to be within capacity diagram.
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR STRENGTH (ACI 21.4.5)

Ve = MAX[ (Mpr, left, top + Mpr, right,bot) / Hn , Vu,max] =
where
top,left =
bot,right =
0.004
0.004
<
<
>
>
246.7
8(fc')0.5c2d =
kips
394.9
[2(fc')0.5c2d + Avfyd/smid ] =
kips
[Satisfactory]
409.1
kips
min=MIN[3(fc') /fy, 200/fy ]=

0.003
min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
0.5
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
Mpr, left, top = MIN [1.25Mn,col,max , 0.5 (Mpr,top beam, left + Mpr,top beam, right) ] =
1254
ft-kips
Mpr, right, bot = MIN [1.25Mn,col,max , 0.5 (Mpr,bot beam, left + Mpr,bot beam, right) ] =
=
0.75
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
in2
Av =
1.24
1254
ft-kips
3. David A. Fanella: "Design of Concrete Buildings for Earthquake and Wind Forces", Portland Cement Association, 1998.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
CHECK STRONG COLUMN - WEAK BEAM (ACI 21.4.2.2)
4077.7
Mc = Mn,top @ Pu, top + Mn,bot @ Pu, bot =
>
where
1.2Mg = 1.2(Mn,top + Mn,bot) =

Mn,top @ Pu, top =
Mn,bot @ Pu, bot =
2486.5
2038.9
ft-kips
2038.9
ft-kips
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
ft-kips
ft-kips
Mn,top @ Pu, top

[Satisfactory]
Mn,top
Mn,top =
1300.5
ft-kips, (slab bars included, ACI 318-02)
Mn,bot =
771.5
ft-kips
Mn,bot
Note: For UBC 97, Mc & Mg shall be at the center of the joint with factors,
which means Mc > (0.9/0.7)1.2Mg.
Mn,bot @ Pu, bot
CHECK JOINT CAPACITY (ACI 21.5)

Ve = 1.25fy(As,top + As,bot) - (Mpr,top + Mpr,bot)/Hn =
where
As,top =
9.00
in2
As,bot =
5.00
in2
Mpr,top =
1563.6
ft-kips
Mpr,bot =
945.2
ft-kips
10.17
ft
Hn =
Vn = k Aj (fc')
where
0.5
804.5
Aj = c1 MIN(b+c1 , c2) =
k=
=
20
0.85
803.3
kips
As,top
Mpr,top
>
kips
864
Ve
in
Mpr,bot
[Satisfactory]
(20 for four faces, 15 for three faces, & 12 for others)
(ACI 9.3.4 c)
As,bot
THEJOINT DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

3. David A. Fanella: "Design of Concrete Buildings for Earthquake and Wind Forces", Portland Cement Association, 1998.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Shear Wall Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
CONCRETE STRENGTH
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fc'
fy
=
=
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD

FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
Pu
Mu
Vu
= 1472 k
= 52214 ft-k
=
50 k
LENGTH OF SHEAR WALL

THICKNESS OF WALL
DEPTH AT FLANGE
WIDTH AT FLANGE
TOTAL WALL HEIGHT TO TOP
REINF. BARS AT BULB
WALL DIST. HORIZ. REINF.
WALL DIST. VERT. REINF.
HOOP REINF - WIDTH, B, DIR.
HOOP REINF - LENGTH DIR.
5
5
L
t
D
B
hw
32
2
2
legs of
legs of
=
=
=
=
=
#
#
#
#
#
4
60
DESIGN SUMMARY
ksi
ksi
25
16
36
36
148
11
5
5
5
5
SHEAR WALL LENGTH

SHEAR WALL THICKNESS
BULB END WIDTH
BULB END DEPTH
BULB REINFORCING
WALL HORIZ. REINF
WALL VERT. REINF
ft
in
in
in
ft
@
@
L
t
B
D
#
#
#
#
#
32
2
2
5
5
=
=
=
=
11
5
5
5
5
25.00
16.00
36.00
36.00
ft
in
in
in
@
@
@
@
12
12
6
6
in o.c.
in o.c.
in o.c.
in o.c.
THE WALL DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
L
12
12
in. o.c.
in. o.c.
ANALYSIS
16000
14000
12000
10000
Pn (k)
8000
6000
25
4000
2000
0
0
20000
40000
60000
80000 100000 120000 140000
Mn (ft-k)

THE MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT RATIOS ARE GIVEN BY ACI 318-02 SECTION 21.7.2.1 AND SECTION 14.3 AS
0.5
(n )min. =
0.0020
[ for Acv (fc') =
303.58
kips
>
Vu , and bar size #5 horizontal]
0.5
(V )min. =
0.0012
[ for Acv (fc') =
kips
>
303.58
where
Acv =
4800 in2
(gross area of concrete section bounded by web thickness and length in the shear direction)
THE PROVIDED REINFORCEMENT RATIOS ARE
n = 0.0032
> (n )min.
[Satisfactory]
V =
0.0032
>
(V )min.
[Satisfactory]
The proposed spacing is less than the maximum permissible value of 18 in and is satisfactory. Since wall Vu
one curtain reinforcement required. (ACI 318-02, Sec.21.7.2.2)
THE DESIGN SHEAR FORCE IS GIVEN BY ACI 318-02 SECTION 21.7.4.1 & 21.7.4.4 AS
Vn =MIN [ Acv (c (fc')0.5 + n fy), 8 Acv (fc')0.5 ] =
where
c =
>
922.29 kips
>
Vu
0.6
hw / L
2.0
( for
[Satisfactory]
5.92
>2)
(only for hw / L > 2.0, ACI 318-02 Sec. 21.7.4.3)
<
[Satisfactory]
2 Acv (fc')
0.5

THE MAXIMUN DESIGN AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH, ACI 318-02, Sec. 21.7.5.1 & Eq.(10-2), IS
14336 kips.
>
Pu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.65 (ACI 318-02, Sec.9.3.2.2)
6240 in2.
Ag =
Ast =
112.24 in2.
THE DESIGN MOMENT CAPACITY AT MAXIMUM AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH ARE FROM 0 TO 30305 ft-kips.
where
FOR THE BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION UNDER COMBINED FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOAD, THE MAXIMUM STRAIN IN THE CONCRETE
AND IN THE TENSION REINFORCEMENT MUST SIMULTANEOUSLY REACH THE VALUES SPECIFIED IN ACI 318-02 SEC. 10.3.2
AS c = 0.003 AND t = f y / Es = 0.002069 . THE DEPTH TO THE NEUTRAL AXIS AND EQUIVALENT RECTANGULAR CONCRETE
STRESS BLOCK ARE GIVEN BY

Cb = d c / (c + s) =
167
a = Cb 1 =
in
142
= 0.48 + 83 t =
in
0.652 (ACI 318-02, Fig. R9.3.2)
1 =
where d = (L-0.5D) = 282 in
0.85 ( ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.2.7.3 )
THE DESIGN AXIAL AND MOMENT CAPACITIES AT THE BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION ARE 6580 kips AND 87164 ft-kips.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI SEC. 9.3.2 THE DESIGN MOMENT CAPACITY WITHOUT AXIAL LOAD IS
Mn = 0.9 n =
69914
kips.
SUMMARY OF LOAD VERSUS MOMENT CAPACITIES ARE SHOWN IN THE TABLE BELOW, AND THEY ARE PLOTTED
ON THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM ABOVE.
Pn (kips)
Mn (ft-kips)
AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY
=
14336
0
AT MAXIMUM LOAD
=
14336
30305
AT 0 % TENSION
=
12262
46464
AT 25 % TENSION
=
10458
61850
AT 50 % TENSION
=
8972
72337
AT t = 0.002
=
=
6708
6580
86103
87164
AT t = 0.005
AT FLEXURE ONLY
=
=
6112
0
118161
69914
THE DESIGN FORCES Pu & Mu ARE ALSO PLOTTED ON THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM. FROM THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM,
THE ALLOWABLE MOMENT AT AN AXIAL LOAD Pu IS
Mn =
85496
kips.
> Mu
[Satisfactory]
where = Min[0.9, Max(0.48 + 83 t , 0.65)] =
0.900
(ACI 318-02, Fig. R9.3.2)
CHECK BOUNDARY ZONE REQUIREMENTS

AN EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISION OF BOUNDARY ZONE CONFINEMENT REINFORCEMENT IS GIVEN BY ACI SECTION 21.7.6.2,
21.7.6.3, and 21.7.6.5(a) PROVIDED THAT
c < (L hw) / (600 u)
where
and
c =
u =
35
fc < 0.2 fc'
[Unsatisfactory]
in. ( distance from the extreme compression fiber to neutral axis at Pu & Mn loads. )
12.4 in. ( design displacement, assume 0.007hw as a conservative short cut, see ACI 318-02 Sec. 21.7.6.2a. )
fc = (Pu / A) + (Mu y / I )
y =
A =
=
ksi. ( the maximun extreme fiber compressive stress at Pu & Mu loads. )
1.588
150 in. ( distance from the extreme compression fiber to neutral axis at Pu & Mu loads. )
in2. ( area of transformed section. )
7143
4
68017848 in . ( moment of inertia of transformed section. )
I =
And the longitudinal reinforcement ratio at the wall end =
HENCE SPECIAL BOUNDARY ZONE DETAILING REQUIRED !
The boundary element length = MAX( c-0.1L, 0.5c ) =
0.039
( ACI 318-02, Eq.21-4 )
400 / f y
[Unsatisfactory]
17.31 in. ( ACI 318-02, Sec. 21.7.6.4 )
The maximum hoop spacing = MIN[ B/4 , 6db , 6 , 4+(14-hx)/3 ] =

The required hoop reinforcement
>
Ash, B DIR = (0.09 s hc f c' ) / f yh =

Ash, L DIR = (0.09 s hc f c' ) / f yh =
6
in.o.c. ( ACI 318-02, Sec. 21.4.4.2 & 21.7.6.5a )
2
0.291 in .
<
# 5 provided [Satisfactory]
2
in
.
0.305
<
# 5 provided [Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Shear Wall Design Based on ACI 318-95 / CBC 2001

INPUT DATA
CONCRETE STRENGTH
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fc'
fy
=
=
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD

FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
Pu
Mu
Vu
= 1472 k
= 52214 ft-k
=
50 k
LENGTH OF SHEAR WALL

THICKNESS OF WALL
DEPTH AT FLANGE
WIDTH AT FLANGE
WALL UNSUPPORT HEIGHT
L
t
D
B
Lu
=
=
=
=
=
25
16
36
36
22
ft
in
in
in
ft
hw
32
2
2
legs of
legs of
=
#
#
#
#
#
148
11
5
5
5
5
ft
TOTAL WALL HEIGHT TO TOP

REINF. BARS AT BULB
WALL DIST. HORIZ. REINF.
WALL DIST. VERT. REINF.
5
5
4
60
DESIGN SUMMARY
ksi
ksi
SHEAR WALL LENGTH

SHEAR WALL THICKNESS
BULB END WIDTH
BULB END DEPTH
BULB REINFORCING
WALL HORIZ. REINF
WALL VERT. REINF
L
t
B
D
#
#
#
#
#
32
2
2
5
5
=
=
=
=
11
5
5
5
5
25.00
16.00
36.00
36.00
ft
in
in
in
@
@
@
@
12
12
6
6
in o.c.
in o.c.
in o.c.
in o.c.
THE WALL DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
@
@
12
12
in. o.c.
in. o.c.
ANALYSIS
18000
16000
14000
12000
Pn (k)
10000
8000
6000
4000
22
2000
0
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
Mn (ft-k)

THE MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT RATIOS ARE GIVEN BY ACI 318-95 SECTION 21.6.2.1 AND SECTION 14.3 AS
0.5
(n )min. =
0.0020
[ for Acv (fc') =
303.58
kips
>
0.5
(V )min. =
0.0012
[ for Acv (fc') =
kips
>
303.58
where
Acv =
4800 in2
(gross area of concrete section bounded by web thickness and length in the shear direction)
THE PROVIDED REINFORCEMENT RATIOS ARE
n = 0.0032
> (n )min.
[Satisfactory]
V =
0.0032
>
(V )min.
[Satisfactory]
The proposed spacing is less than the maximum permissible value of 18 in and is satisfactory. Since wall Vu
one curtain reinforcement required. (ACI 318-95, Sec.21.7.2.2)
THE DESIGN SHEAR FORCE IS GIVEN BY ACI 318-95 SECTION 21.7.4.1 & 21.7.4.4 AS
Vn =MIN [ Acv (c (fc')0.5 + n fy), 8 Acv (fc')0.5 ] =
where
c =
>
922.29 kips
0.6
, (conservatively, CBC 1909A.3.4.1)
2.0
( for
[Satisfactory]
hw / L
5.92
>
Vu
>2)
(only for hw / L > 2.0, ACI 318-95 Sec. 21.7.4.3)
<
[Satisfactory]
2 Acv (fc')
0.5

THE MAXIMUN DESIGN AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH, ACI 318-95, Sec. 21.7.5.1 & Eq.(10-2), IS
15439 kips.
>
Pu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.70 (ACI 318-02, Sec.9.3.2.2)
6240 in2.
Ag =
Ast =
112.24 in2.
THE DESIGN MOMENT CAPACITY AT MAXIMUM AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH ARE FROM 0 TO 32636 ft-kips.
where
FOR THE BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION UNDER COMBINED FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOAD, THE MAXIMUM STRAIN IN THE CONCRETE
AND IN THE TENSION REINFORCEMENT MUST SIMULTANEOUSLY REACH THE VALUES SPECIFIED IN ACI 318-95 SEC. 10.3.2
AS c = 0.003 AND t = f y / Es = 0.002069 . THE DEPTH TO THE NEUTRAL AXIS AND EQUIVALENT RECTANGULAR CONCRETE
STRESS BLOCK ARE GIVEN BY

Cb = d c / (c + s) =
167
a = Cb 1 =
in
142
in
0.70
(ACI 318-02, Sec.9.3.2.2)
1 =
where d = (L-0.5D) = 282 in
0.85 ( ACI 318-95, Sec. 10.2.7.3 )
THE DESIGN AXIAL AND MOMENT CAPACITIES AT THE BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION ARE 7068 kips AND 93621 ft-kips.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI SEC. 9.3.2 THE DESIGN MOMENT CAPACITY WITHOUT AXIAL LOAD IS
Mn = 0.9 n =
69914
kips.
Pn (kips)
Mn (ft-kips)
AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY
=
15439
0
AT MAXIMUM LOAD
=
15439
32636
AT 0 % TENSION
=
13205
50038
AT 25 % TENSION
=
11262
66608
AT 50 % TENSION
=
9662
77901
AT t = 0.002
=
=
7223
7068
92726
93621
AT SMALL AXIAL, 0.1 f c' Ag

AT FLEXURE ONLY
=
=
1747
0
51568
69914
THE DESIGN FORCES Pu & Mu ARE ALSO PLOTTED ON THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM. FROM THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM,
THE ALLOWABLE MOMENT AT AN AXIAL LOAD Pu IS
Mn =
76282
kips.
> Mu
[Satisfactory]
where = Max[0.9 - 2Min(Pu , 0.7Pb) / (f c' Ag) , 0.7] =
0.782
(ACI 318-95, 9.3.2.2)
DETERMINE WHETHER THE WALL CAN RESIST SEISMIC LOADS, (CBC 2001, 1921.6.6.3)
Pu =
1472
<
0.35 Ag f c' =
8736 k
[Satisfactory]
CHECK BOUNDARY ZONE REQUIREMENTS

AN EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISION OF BOUNDARY ZONE CONFINEMENT REINFORCEMENT IS GIVEN BY ACI SECTION 21.6.6.6
PROVIDED THAT
Pu =
1472
k
< 0.10 Ag fc' =
2496 k
and either
Mu / (Vu L ) =
or
Vu =
50
41.8
>
1.0
<
3 Acv (f c') =
[Unsatisfactory]
910.7 k
and Mu / (Vu L ) =
[Unsatisfactory]
41.8
>
3.0
HENCE SPECIAL BOUNDARY ZONE DETAILING REQUIRED !

The boundary element width required = Lu / 16 =
17 in
<
B
( ACI 318-95, Sec. 21.6.6.6 )
The boundary element length required =
18.00 in. ( ACI 318-95, Sec. 21.6.6.6 )
The maximum hoop spacing = MIN[ 6db , 6 ] =
The required hoop reinforcement
( ACI 318-95, Eq.21-10 )
in.o.c. ( ACI 318-95, Sec. 21.6.6 )

2
0.291 in .
Ash, B DIR = (0.09 s hc f c' ) / f yh =

Ash, L DIR = (0.09 s hc f c' ) / f yh =
2
0.305 in .
<
<
[Satisfactory]
# 5 provided
[Satisfactory]
# 5 provided
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Tilt-up Panel Design based on ACI 318 - 02

bt

CONCRETE STRENGTH
f 'c =
ksi
fy =
60
ksi
REBAR STRENGTH
w1 = 15.429 psf, for wall
OUT-OF-PARAPET
w2 = 46.286 psf, for parapet

P1DL =
0.8
LEDGER LL
P1LL =
0.8
k/ft
in
DIST. FROM FACE
e1 =
P1
P2
e1
OUT-OF-PLANE FORCE
LEDGER DL
diaphragm
k/ft
design panel
PARAPET DL
P2DL =
0.18
k/ft
PARAPET LIVE LOAD
P2LL =
k/ft
ELEMENT WIDTH
be =
ft
TRIBUTARY WIDTH
bt =
ft
WALL THICKNESS
t =
in
WALL VERT. SPAN
h =
22
ft
PARAPET HEIGHT
hp =
ft
VERT. REINF.- MIDDLE
LAYER
12 in, o.c.
HORIZ. REINF. - MIDDLE
LAYER
12 in, o.c.
wall load
be
REVEAL THICKNESS
0.75
in
ANALYSIS
CHECK VERTICAL FACTORED LOAD LESS THAN 0.06fc'Ag (ACI 318-02 Sec. 14.8.2.6)
P u = (1.2 P1DL + 1.6 P1LL + 1.2 P 2 DL + 1.6 P 2 LL + 0.6 w Ph ) b t
3.78
<
0.06fc'Ag =
20.88 k
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT LESS THAN 0.6b (ACI 318-02 Sec. 14.8.2.3)
max = 0.6 b = 0.6
0.85 b f c
87000
87000 + f
fy
'
actual =
>
0.017
0.007
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK Mcr LESS THAN Mn
= MAX 0.9
M cr =
7.5
0.25P u
MIN 0.1 f 'c A g , P b
, 0.65
= 0.8823
(ACI 318-02 Sec. 9.3.2.2)
'
f cIg
yt
49.87
(ACI 318-02 Sec. 9.5.2.3)
M n = Ase f y d
<
k-in
a
2
64.25
k-in
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK WALL STRENGTH
bec
I cr = n As e( d c ) +
3
2
Mu =
27
M ua =
in
(ACI 318-02 Sec. 14.8.3)
M ua
5P u h 2
( 0.75) 48E c I cr
35.23 k-in
1.6w1bt h2
e + 0.5t
3 + P1u
8
2
M n
<
24.5 k-in
= 64.25 k-in
[SATISFACTORY]
(ACI 318-02 Sec. 14.8.3, EQ14-6)

CHECK SERVICE LOAD OUT-OF-PLANE DEFLECTION (ACI 318-02 Sec. 14.8.3, EQ14-9)
e + 0.5t
w1bt h +
( P1DL + P1LL )
M sa =
8
2
2
M =
1
s =
M sa
5P s h 2
48E c I cr
5M h 2
48E c I e
24.422 k-in
0.10
in
P s = ( P1DL + P1LL + P 2 DL + P 2LL + 0.5w Ph ) bt
19.2 k-in
I e = MIN
h
150
<
M cr
M
I g + 1
1.8 in
M cr
M
I cr , I g
2.9
4
512 in
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK PARAPET STRENGTH
M u , par apet =
1.6 w2b t h 2p
2
k-in
<
M n = 0.9 As e f y d
a
2
64
k-in
[SATISFACTORY]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Wall Pier Design Based on CBC 2001 / UBC 1997
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc' =
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy =
WALL PIER LENGTH
L =
WALL PIER HIGHT
H =
WALL PIER THICKNESS
t =
ksi
60
ksi
ft
12
ft
10
in
60
VERTICAL EDGE BARS, As

2
#
9
TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT, Av
2
#
4
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD
Pu =
@
60
kips
FACTORED SHEAR FORCE
60
kips, (in plane)
Vu =
in, o.c. (at each face.)
ANALYSIS
CHECK WALL PIER DEFINITION (CBC 2001 1902A)
L/t=
6.00
within [2.5 , 6]
&
H/L=
2.40
>
2
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR STRENGTH (SEC 1921.6.13.2, 1921.4.51, & 1921.3.4.2)

Ve = (Mpr, left, top + Mpr, right,bot) / H + Vu =
175.1
kips
<
<
where
d=
left =
right =
58.19
in
8(fc')0.5bd =
216.7
kips
[Satisfactory]
[Vc + Avfyd/s ] =
197.8
kips
[Satisfactory]
min=MIN[3(fc')0.5/fy, 200/fy ]=
0.003
0.003
min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
2
Mpr, left, top = left bd fy (1.25 - 0.919left fy/fc') =
691
ft-kips
2
Mpr, right ,bot = right bd fy (1.25 - 0.919right fy/fc') =
691
ft-kips
=
Av =
>
>
0.003
0.85
0.4
Vc = 2(fc')0.5bd =
[Satisfactory]
(Sec 1909.3.2.3)
2
in
0.0
kips, (Per Sec 1921.3.4.2, Vc = 0, if (Ve -Vu)
50% Ve AND Pu < Ag fc' / 20 )
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Concrete Slab Capacity Based on ACI 318-02 / CBC 2001

4.5
60
f'c =
fy =
ksi
ksi
t
cC
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
REBAR
6 @ 24
6 @ 22
6 @ 20
6 @ 18
6 @ 16
6 @ 14
6 @ 12
6 @ 10
6 @ 8
6 @ 6
6 @ 4
6 @ 2
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
5
60
f'c =
fy =
=
=
7.25
1
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
As, in /ft
0.220
0.240
0.264
0.293
0.330
0.377
0.440
0.528
0.660
0.880
1.320
2.640
d, in
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
5.88
a, in
0.288
0.314
0.345
0.383
0.431
0.493
0.575
0.690
0.863
1.150
1.725
3.451
T, k/ft Mn, ft-k/ft

13.20
5.67
14.40
6.18
15.84
6.77
17.60
7.50
19.80
8.40
22.63
9.55
26.40
11.06
31.68
13.14
39.60
16.17
52.80
20.99
79.20
29.77
158.40
49.30
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
0.155
0.169
0.186
0.207
0.233
0.266
0.310
0.372
0.465
0.620
0.930
1.860
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
5.94
0.203
0.221
0.243
0.270
0.304
0.347
0.405
0.486
0.608
0.810
1.216
2.431
9.30
10.15
11.16
12.40
13.95
15.94
18.60
22.32
27.90
37.20
55.80
111.60
ksi
ksi
t
cC
=
=
7.25
1.5
in
in
4.07
4.43
4.87
5.40
6.05
6.89
8.00
9.53
11.79
15.44
22.30
39.52
in
in
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
REBAR
5 @ 24
5 @ 22
5 @ 20
5 @ 18
5 @ 16
5 @ 14
5 @ 12
5 @ 10
5 @ 8
5 @ 6
5 @ 4
5 @ 2
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
As, in /ft
0.155
0.169
0.186
0.207
0.233
0.266
0.310
0.372
0.465
0.620
0.930
1.860
d, in
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
5.44
a, in
0.182
0.199
0.219
0.243
0.274
0.313
0.365
0.438
0.547
0.729
1.094
2.188
T, k/ft Mn, ft-k/ft

9.30
3.73
10.15
4.06
11.16
4.46
12.40
4.94
13.95
5.55
15.94
6.31
18.60
7.33
22.32
8.74
27.90
10.81
37.20
14.15
55.80
20.47
111.60
36.35
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
" O.C.
0.100
0.109
0.120
0.133
0.150
0.171
0.200
0.240
0.300
0.400
0.600
1.200
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
0.118
0.128
0.141
0.157
0.176
0.202
0.235
0.282
0.353
0.471
0.706
1.412
6.00
6.55
7.20
8.00
9.00
10.29
12.00
14.40
18.00
24.00
36.00
72.00
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
2.45
2.67
2.93
3.25
3.65
4.17
4.84
5.79
7.19
9.48
13.90
25.89
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Single Tension Fastener Away from Edges Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc '
=
4
ksi
=
60
ksi
SPECIFIED STRENGTH OF FASTENER
fut
(The strength of most fastenings is likely to be controlled by the embedment strength rather
than the steel strength, so it is usually economical to use ASTM A307 Grade A fastener.)
FACTORED DESIGN LOAD
Nu
=
7.4
k
=
3.5
in
EFFECTIVE EMBEDMENT DEPTH
hef
FASTENER DIAMETER
d
=
0.625 in
FASTENER HEAD TYPE
2
Heavy Square
( 1=Square, 2=Heavy Square, 3=Hex, 4=Heavy Hex, 5=Hardened Washers )
ANALYSIS
EFFECTIVE AREA OF FASTENER
BEARING AREA OF HEAD
CHECK FASTENER TENSILE STRENGTH :
N s = n Ase ( 0.8 f ut )
Ase
Ab
=
=
0.226
0.822
in2
in2
>
Nu
9.763 k
[THE FASTENER DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
[Satisfactory]
where :
=
0.9
CHECK CONCRETE BREAKOUT STRENGTH :
N cb = 0.625
A N 2 3 N b = A N 2 3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
A No
AN o
7.454 k
>
Nu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
AN/Ano and 2 terms are 1.0 for single fasteners away form edges.
3 term is 1.0 for location where concrete cracking is likely to occur (i.e., bottom of the slab)
CHECK PULLOUT STRENGTH :
where :
N pn = 4 ( Ab8 f 'c )
19.728 k
>
Nu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
4 term is 1.0 for location where concrete cracking is likely to occur.
EVALUATE SIDE-FACE BLOWOUT :
Since this fastener is located far from a free edge of concrete (c>0.4hef ) this type of failure mode is not applicable.
REQUIRED EDGE DISTANCES AND SPACINGS TO PRECLUDE SPLITTING FAILURE :
Since this fastener is located far from a free edge of concrete (c>0.4hef ) this type of failure mode is not applicable.
where :
Summary of Dimensional Properties of Fasteners

Fastener
Diameter
( in )
0.250
0.375
0.500
0.625
0.750
0.875
1.000
1.125
1.250
1.375
1.500
1.750
2.000
1/4
3/8
1/2
5/8
3/4
7/8
1
1 1/8
1 1/4
1 3/8
1 1/2
1 3/4
2
Effective
Bearing Area of Heads, Nuts, and Washers
Gross
Area of
( Ab ) ( in2 )
Area of Threaded
Fastener Fastener
Heavy
Heavy Hardened
Square
Hex
( in2 )
( in2 )
Square
Hex
Washers
0.049
0.032
0.142
0.201
0.117
0.167
0.258
0.110
0.078
0.280
0.362
0.164
0.299
0.408
0.196
0.142
0.464
0.569
0.291
0.467
0.690
0.307
0.226
0.693
0.822
0.454
0.671
1.046
0.442
0.334
0.824
1.121
0.654
0.911
1.252
0.601
0.462
1.121
1.465
0.891
1.188
1.804
0.785
0.606
1.465
1.855
1.163
1.501
2.356
0.994
0.763
1.854
2.291
1.472
1.851
2.982
1.227
0.969
2.288
2.773
1.817
2.237
3.682
1.485
1.160
2.769
3.300
2.199
2.659
4.455
1.767
1.410
3.295
3.873
2.617
3.118
5.301
2.405
1.900
4.144
6.541
3.142
2.500
5.316
7.903
Techincal Reference:
1. Ronald Cook, "Strength Design
of Anchorage to Concrete," PCA,
1999.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Group of Tension Fasteners Near an Edge with Eccentricity Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc '
=
4
ksi
=
60
ksi
fut
FACTORED DESIGN LOAD
Nu
=
11.7 k
=
4.5
in
hef
FASTENER DIAMETER
d
=
0.5
in
FASTENER HEAD TYPE
2
Heavy Square
ECCENTRICITY
e
=
2
in
FASTENER CENTER-TO-CENTER SPACING
s
=
6
in
DIST. FR. THE OUTER FASTENERS TO EDGE
c
=
3
in
ANALYSIS
TOTAL NUMBER OF FASTENERS

CHECK HIGHTEST TENSILE STRENGTH :
n
Ase
Ab
N s ,1stud = Ase ( 0.8 f ut ) =
=
=
=
4
0.142
0.569
>
6.134 k
in2
in2, ( or determined from manufactures's catalogs.)
N u ,max,1stud =
N u ( s + 2e )
ns
4.875
[Satisfactory]
where :
=
0.9
N cbg = A N 1 2 3 N b = A N2
( 9h )
A No
ef
1
2e
1+
3h e f
0.7 +
0.3c
3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
1.5h ef
>
Nu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
CHECK PULLOUT STRENGTH OF SINGLE STUD :
where :
11.773 k
N pn = 4 ( Ab8 f 'c )
>
13.656 k
Nu, max, 1 stud
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
EVALUATE SIDE-FACE BLOWOUT :
c
>
0.4hef
[Satisfactory]
Since the fasteners are located far from a free edge of concrete c>0.4hef this type of failure mode is not applicable.
Since a welded, headed fastener is not torqued, the minimun cover requirements of ACI 318 Sec. 7.7 apply.
CoverProvd
>
CoverReqd
[Satisfactory]
where :

Fastener
Diameter
( in )
0.250
0.375
0.500
0.625
0.750
0.875
1.000
1.125
1.250
1.375
1.500
1.750
2.000
1/4
3/8
1/2
5/8
3/4
7/8
1
1 1/8
1 1/4
1 3/8
1 1/2
1 3/4
2
Gross
Area of
Fastener
( in2 )
0.049
0.110
0.196
0.307
0.442
0.601
0.785
0.994
1.227
1.485
1.767
2.405
3.142
Effective
Area of
Threaded
Fastener
( in2 )
0.032
0.078
0.142
0.226
0.334
0.462
0.606
0.763
0.969
1.160
1.410
1.900
2.500
Square
0.142
0.280
0.464
0.693
0.824
1.121
1.465
1.854
2.288
2.769
3.295
-

( Ab ) ( in2 )
Heavy
Heavy
Hardened
Hex
Square
Hex
Washers
0.201
0.117
0.167
0.258
0.362
0.164
0.299
0.408
0.569
0.291
0.467
0.690
0.822
0.454
0.671
1.046
1.121
0.654
0.911
1.252
1.465
0.891
1.188
1.804
1.855
1.163
1.501
2.356
2.291
1.472
1.851
2.982
2.773
1.817
2.237
3.682
3.300
2.199
2.659
4.455
3.873
2.617
3.118
5.301
4.144
6.541
5.316
7.903
1999.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Single Fastener in Tension and Shear Near an Edge Based on ACI 318-02
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc '
=
4
ksi
fut
=
60
ksi
FACTORED DESIGN TENSION LOAD
Nu
=
2.47 k
FACTORED DESIGN SHEAR LOAD
Vu
=
0.65 k
hef
=
7
in
FASTENER DIAMETER
d
=
0.5
in
FASTENER HEAD TYPE
3
Hex
DIST. BETWEEN THE FASTENER AND EDGE
c
=
1.75 in
ANALYSIS
CHECK FASTENER TENSILE STRENGTH :
N s = n Ase ( 0.8 f ut )
Ase
Ab
=
=
0.142
0.291
where :
=
0.9
N cb = A N 2 3N b = A N2
( 9h e f )
ANo
0.7 +
in2
>
6.134 k
Nu
[Satisfactory]
0.3c
3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
1.5h e f
>
Nu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
where :
9.224 k
N pn = 4 ( Ab8 f 'c )
>
6.984 k
Nu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
CHECK SIDE-FACE BLOWOUT STRENGTH : (Since c > 0.4hef , this type of failure mode is applicable.)
where :
N sb = 160c Ab
'
fc
>
7.165 k
Nu
[Satisfactory]
where :
=
0.75
DETERMINE DESIGN TENSILE STRENGTH :
N n = min ( N s , N cb , N pn , N sb )
6.134
CHECK FASTENER SHEAR STRENGTH :
V s = n0.6 Ase f ut
>
4.601 k
Vu
[Satisfactory]
where :
=
0.9
CHECK CONCRETE BREAKOUT STRENGTH FOR SHEAR LOAD :
l
V cb = AV 6 7V b = AV 6 7 7
AVo
where :
AVo
0.2
'
f c c1.5
0.824 k
=
0.75
AV/AVo and 6 terms are 1.0 for single shear fastener not influenced by more than one free edge.
term is load bearing length of the anchor for shear, not to exceed 8d.
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
(Cont'd)
CHECK PRYOUT STRENGTH FOR SHEAR LOAD :
V cp = k cp A N 2 3 N b = k cp A N2
(9h )
A No
=
where :
0.7 +
ef
0.3c
3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
1.5h ef
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
for hef > 2.5 in.
kcp
=
2.0
18.448 k
V n = min (V s , V cb , V cp )
0.824
CHECK TENSION AND SHEAR INTERACTION :

0.2 Nn and
Nu
>
Since
>
Vu
0.2 Vn the full design strength is not permitted.
The interaction equation must be used
Nu
Nn
Vu
V n
1.19
<
1.2
[Satisfactory]

Fastener
Diameter
( in )
0.250
0.375
0.500
0.625
0.750
0.875
1.000
1.125
1.250
1.375
1.500
1.750
2.000
1/4
3/8
1/2
5/8
3/4
7/8
1
1 1/8
1 1/4
1 3/8
1 1/2
1 3/4
2
Effective
Gross
Area of
2
( Ab ) ( in )
Area of Threaded
Fastener Fastener
Heavy
Heavy Hardened
Square
Hex
( in2 )
( in2 )
Square
Hex
Washers
0.049
0.032
0.142
0.201
0.117
0.167
0.258
0.110
0.078
0.280
0.362
0.164
0.299
0.408
0.196
0.142
0.464
0.569
0.291
0.467
0.690
0.307
0.226
0.693
0.822
0.454
0.671
1.046
0.442
0.334
0.824
1.121
0.654
0.911
1.252
0.601
0.462
1.121
1.465
0.891
1.188
1.804
0.785
0.606
1.465
1.855
1.163
1.501
2.356
0.994
0.763
1.854
2.291
1.472
1.851
2.982
1.227
0.969
2.288
2.773
1.817
2.237
3.682
1.485
1.160
2.769
3.300
2.199
2.659
4.455
1.767
1.410
3.295
3.873
2.617
3.118
5.301
2.405
1.900
4.144
6.541
3.142
2.500
5.316
7.903
1999.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Group of Tension and Shear Fasteners Near Two Edges Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc '
=
4
ksi
fut
=
58
ksi
=
21.3 k
FACTORED DESIGN TENSION LOAD
Nu
FACTORED DESIGN SHEAR LOAD
Vu
=
2
k
hef
=
20
in
FASTENER DIAMETER
d
=
1
in
FASTENER HEAD TYPE
4
Heavy Hex
s
=
7
in
c1
=
14
in
c2
=
9
in
ANALYSIS
NUMBER OF FASTENERS
n
Ase
Ab
CHECK THE FASTENERS TENSILE STRENGTH :
N s = n Ase ( 0.8 f ut )
=
=
=
2
0.606
1.501
in2
>
50.613 k
Nu
where :
=
0.9
[Satisfactory]
0.3
N cbg = A N 1 2 3 N b = A N2 1 0.7 + c min 3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
( 9h )
ANo
1.5h e f
ef
>
Nu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
1 term is 1.0 for no eccentricity in the connection.
where :
45.225 k
N pn = n 4 ( Ab8 f 'c )
>
72.048 k
Nu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
CHECK SIDE-FACE BLOWOUT STRENGTH :
cmin
>
0.4hef
[Satisfactory]
Since the fasteners are located far from a free edge of concrete, c>0.4hef ,this type of failure mode is not applicable.
where :
N n = min ( N s , N cb , N pn )
45.225
CHECK FASTENERs SHEAR STRENGTH :
V s = n0.6 Ase f ut
where :
=
0.9
37.960 k
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
(1.5c1)(1.5c1 + s + c 2) 0.7 + 0.3 c 2

V cbg = AV 5 6 7V b =
5
2
4.5c1
AVo
>
19.243 k
Vu
1.5c1
7 7
l
d
'
f c c11.5
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
where :
CHECK PRYOUT STRENGTH FOR SHEAR LOAD :
(9h )
A No
=
where :
(Cont'd)
0.2
0.7 +
ef
0.3c min
3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
1.5h ef
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
for hef > 2.5 in.
=
2.0
kcp
104.573 k
19.243

Since headed cast-in-place fasteners are not like to be highly torqued, the minimun cover requirements of ACI 318 Sec. 7.7 apply.
>
CoverReqd
[Satisfactory]
CoverProvd
CHECK TENSION AND SHEAR INTERACTION :
0.2 Nn and
Nu
Since
>
<
Vu
0.2 Vn the full tension design strength is permitted.
Nu
Nn
Vu
V n
0.57
<
1.2
[Satisfactory]

Fastener
Diameter
( in )
0.250
0.375
0.500
0.625
0.750
0.875
1.000
1.125
1.250
1.375
1.500
1.750
2.000
1/4
3/8
1/2
5/8
3/4
7/8
1
1 1/8
1 1/4
1 3/8
1 1/2
1 3/4
2
Effective
Gross
Area of
2
( Ab ) ( in )
Area of Threaded
Fastener Fastener
Heavy
Heavy Hardened
Square
Hex
( in2 )
( in2 )
Square
Hex
Washers
0.049
0.032
0.142
0.201
0.117
0.167
0.258
0.110
0.078
0.280
0.362
0.164
0.299
0.408
0.196
0.142
0.464
0.569
0.291
0.467
0.690
0.307
0.226
0.693
0.822
0.454
0.671
1.046
0.442
0.334
0.824
1.121
0.654
0.911
1.252
0.601
0.462
1.121
1.465
0.891
1.188
1.804
0.785
0.606
1.465
1.855
1.163
1.501
2.356
0.994
0.763
1.854
2.291
1.472
1.851
2.982
1.227
0.969
2.288
2.773
1.817
2.237
3.682
1.485
1.160
2.769
3.300
2.199
2.659
4.455
1.767
1.410
3.295
3.873
2.617
3.118
5.301
2.405
1.900
4.144
6.541
3.142
2.500
5.316
7.903
1999.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Column Base Fasteners Near Two Edges Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc '
=
4
ksi
fut
=
58
ksi
=
0
k
FACTORED COLUMN AXIAL LOAD
Pu
FACTORED TOTAL BASE SHEAR LOAD
Vu
=
2
k
FACTORED COLUMN MOMENT
Mu
=
14.58 ft-k
hef
=
16
in
FASTENER DIAMETER
d
=
0.875 in
FASTENER HEAD TYPE
4
Heavy Hex
s
=
12
in
DIST. BETWEEN FASTENER & EDGE
c1
=
7
in
DIST. BETWEEN FASTENER & EDGE
c2
=
12
in
ANALYSIS
NUMBER OF GOVERNING FASTENERS

n
=
MAX TENSION ON GOV'G FASTENERS Nu = Mu / (s - 2.0") - Pu / 2 =
SHEAR FORCE ON GOV'G FASTENERS
Vu = Vu, total / 2 =
=
EFFECTIVE AREA OF ONE FASTENER
Ase
BEARING AREA OF ONE HEAD
Ab
=
1.188
CHECK THE GOVERNING FASTENERS TENSILE STRENGTH :
N s = n Ase ( 0.8 f ut )
2
16
17.50 k
1
k
2
0.462 in
2
in , ( or determined from manufactures's catalogs.)
>
38.586 k
Nu
[Satisfactory]
where :
=
0.9
CHECK CONCRETE BREAKOUT STRENGTH OF GOVERNING FASTENERS :
0.3
N cbg = A N 1 2 3 N b = A N2 1 0.7 + c min 3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
( 9h )
ANo
1.5h e f
ef
>
Nu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
CHECK PULLOUT STRENGTH OF GOVERNING FASTENERS :
where :
37.056 k
N pn = n 4 ( Ab8 f 'c )
>
57.024 k
Nu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
CHECK SIDE-FACE BLOWOUT STRENGTH :
cmin
>
0.4hef
[Satisfactory]
Since the fasteners are located far from a free edge of concrete, c>0.4hef ,this type of failure mode is not applicable.
DETERMINE DESIGN TENSILE STRENGTH OF GOVERNING FASTENERS :
where :
N n = min ( N s , N cb , N pn )
37.056
CHECKGOVERNING FASTENERS SHEAR STRENGTH :
V s = n0.6 Ase f ut
where :
=
0.9
28.940 k
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
(for built-up grout pads, = 0.8 x 0.9, ACI 318-02 D6.1.3)
(1.5c1)(1.5c1 + s + c 2) 0.7 + 0.3 c 2

l
V cbg = AV 5 6 7V b =
5
7 7
2
d
c
4.5
1.5
1
c1
AVo
=
(Cont'd)
0.2
'
f c c11.5
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
where :
14.938 k
CHECK PRYOUT STRENGTH FOR SHEAR LOAD ON GOVERNING FASTENERS :
(9h )
A No
0.7 +
ef
0.3c min
3 24 f 'c h1.5
ef
1.5h ef
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
0.75
for hef > 2.5 in.
kcp
=
2.0
DETERMINE DESIGN TENSILE STRENGTH OF GOVERNING FASTENERS :
where :
86.065 k
14.938

Since headed cast-in-place fasteners are not like to be highly torqued, the minimun cover requirements of ACI 318 Sec. 7.7 apply.
CoverProvd
>
CoverReqd
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TENSION AND SHEAR INTERACTION OF GOVERNING FASTENERS :
0.2 Nn and
Nu
Since
>
<
0.2 Vn the full tension design strength is permitted.
Vu
Nu
Nn
Vu
V n
0.54
<
1.2
[Satisfactory]

Fastener
Diameter
( in )
0.250
0.375
0.500
0.625
0.750
0.875
1.000
1.125
1.250
1.375
1.500
1.750
2.000
1/4
3/8
1/2
5/8
3/4
7/8
1
1 1/8
1 1/4
1 3/8
1 1/2
1 3/4
2
Effective
Gross
Area of
2
( Ab ) ( in )
Area of Threaded
Fastener Fastener
Heavy
Heavy Hardened
Square
Hex
( in2 )
( in2 )
Square
Hex
Washers
0.049
0.032
0.142
0.201
0.117
0.167
0.258
0.110
0.078
0.280
0.362
0.164
0.299
0.408
0.196
0.142
0.464
0.569
0.291
0.467
0.690
0.307
0.226
0.693
0.822
0.454
0.671
1.046
0.442
0.334
0.824
1.121
0.654
0.911
1.252
0.601
0.462
1.121
1.465
0.891
1.188
1.804
0.785
0.606
1.465
1.855
1.163
1.501
2.356
0.994
0.763
1.854
2.291
1.472
1.851
2.982
1.227
0.969
2.288
2.773
1.817
2.237
3.682
1.485
1.160
2.769
3.300
2.199
2.659
4.455
1.767
1.410
3.295
3.873
2.617
3.118
5.301
2.405
1.900
4.144
6.541
3.142
2.500
5.316
7.903
1999.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Concrete Beam Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
f 'c
2.5
ksi
Mu =
272.5
ft-k
Main Bar fy
60
ksi
Vu =
46.4
Stirrup fy
60
ksi
110
24
30
ft-k
in, (ACI 8.10.2)
in
24
in
hf =
0
10
in o.c.
d (optional)
=
in
Top bars
Tu =
b=
h=
Bot bars
bw =
Stirrup size
No. of legs
==>
=
4
4
DESIGN SUMMARY
2
Main bar top (Compressive Reinf.) :
Main bar bottom (Tensile Reinf.) :
in
The design is inadequate
Stirrups : Use # 4 @ 10 in. o.c. (4 legs)
Use 3 # 7
Use 7 # 7 ( 1 layer )
GOVERNING CASE ANALYSIS
0.003
27.6
d'
2.4
0.85
max
0.0129
in
0.90
ES
29000
in
min
0.0033
w = As =
Case 1
0.0063
b wd
AS
ksi
24
Case 2
Case 4
Case 3
CASE 2 APPLICABLE
FLEXURAL ANALYSIS
Case 1 Analysis :
a = d d2
2M u
=
0.85 b f C '
AS =
in
0.85ab f C '
=
fy
in
Case 2 Analysis :
a = d d2
2
h
Mu
(b b w ) h f d f
2
b w 0.85f f C '
2.72
AS =
in
0.85 f C ' ( ab w + bh f b wh f )
f
A S = AS '
AS ' =
in
f S ' 0.85 f C ' ba

+
=
fy
fy
f S ' = E S u
in2
M u 0.85 f C ' ba d
f S ' ( d d ')
a 1d '
=
a
2.31
in2
Case 3 Analysis :
d =
a= u
u + 0.004
a
2
in2
in2
ksi
Case 4 Analysis :
ud =
a=
u + 0.004
AS = AS '
a
h
+ 0.85 f C ' (b b w ) h f d f
2
2
f S ' ( d d ')
M u 0.85 f C ' b wa d
in
AS ' =
f S ' 0.85 f C ' ( b b w ) h f + a bw

+
=
fy
fy
in2
f S ' = E S u
a 1d '
=
a
ksi
(cont'd)
SHEAR ANALYSIS
Check section limitation (ACI 11.5.6.8)
V u 10 b wd f c
Determine concrete capacity (ACI 11.3.1.1 or 11.3.2.1)
'
46.4
where
<
=
248.1
0.75
V C = 2b wd
[Satisfactory]
where
for V u < V c
2
50b w
V c
, for
V u V c
2
f y
0 ,
=
Re qD
V u V c
,
df y
A = MIN
72.06
54.07
, 1.0 =
0.391
'
c
d
B = MIN V u
Mu
k ,<== applicable
, 100 =
for V c V u
2
in / ft
0.240
66.15
V C = (1.9 A + 2500 wB ) b wd =
Check shear reinforcement (ACI 11.5)
Av
s
'
fc=
<
Av
s
= 0.960
in2 / ft
[Satisfactory]
Pr ovD
Check spacing limits for shear reinforcement (ACI 11.5.4)
Vs=
V u V C
-10.20
d
'
, 24) for V s 4b wd f c
2
S max, shear =
d
'
MIN (
, 12) for V s > 4b wd f c
4
MIN (
13
>
S=
[Satisfactory]
10
in
TORSION ANALYSIS
Vu
b wd
T u Ph
+
1.7 A2
oh
0.412
V C + 8 f 'c
b wd
0.375
>
where
0.75
Ph =
80
Aoh =
391
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
in, (perimeter of centerline of outermost closed
transverse torsional reinforcement.)
in2 (area enclosed by centerline of the outermost
closed transverse torsional reinforcement.)
[Unsatisfactory]
Check if torsional reinforcement required (ACI 11.6.1)

where
Acp
P cp
Tu f c
'
110.0
>
15.0
ft-k
Torsional reinforcement reqD.
be = MIN(h-hf , 4hf) =
Pcp =
108
Acp =
720
in, (one side, ACI 6.1.1)
in, (outside perimeter of the concrete cross

section.)
2
in (area enclosed by outside perimeter of
concrete cross section.)
Check the max factored torque causing cracking (ACI 11.6.2.2)
T u 4
Acp
P cp
'
c
110.0
>
60.0
Torsional reinforcement reqD for full torque.
Determine the area of one leg of a closed stirrup (ACI 11.6.3.6)
At = T u
s 2 A0 f
=
yv
Tu
1.7 A0 h f
0.00
in2 / ft
yv
Determine the corresponding area of longitudinal reinforcement (derived from ACI 11.6.3.7 & 11.6.5.3)
A L = MAX
'
At f yv , 5 Acp f c f yv MAX At , 25b w
Ph
Ph
s
s
f yL
f yL
f yL
f yv
0.00
in
(cont'd)
Determine minimum combined area of longitudinal reinforcement
in2
AL, top = As' +0.5AL =
0.00
<
actual
[Satisfactory]
AL, bot = As +0.5AL =
[Satisfactory]
2.31
in2
actual
<
Determine minimum diameter for longitudinal reinforcement (ACI 11.6.6.2)

dbL = MAX(S/24, 0.375) =
0.42
in
0.88
<
Determine minimum combined area of stirrups (ACI 11.6.5.2 & 11.6.6.1)

2
in / ft
<
0.24
At / S = MAX[(Av+2At)S, 50bw/fyv] =
Smax, tor = MIN[(Ph/8, 12) =
SreqD = MIN(Smax,shear , Smax,tor) =
10
in
[Satisfactory]
actual
[Satisfactory]
actual
[Satisfactory]
in
10
in
>
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Concrete Beam Design Based on ACI 318-99/95

INPUT DATA
f 'c
2.5
ksi
Mu =
272.5
ft-k
Main Bar fy
60
ksi
Vu =
46.4
Stirrup fy
60
ksi
110
24
30
ft-k
in, (ACI 8.10.2)
in
24
in
hf =
0
10
in o.c.
d (optional)
=
in
Top bars
Tu =
b=
h=
Bot bars
bw =
Stirrup size
No. of legs
==>
=
4
4
2
DESIGN SUMMARY
Main bar top (Compressive Reinf.) :
Main bar bottom (Tensile Reinf.) :
in
The design is adequate.
Stirrups : Use # 4 @ 10 in. o.c. (4 legs)
Use 3 # 7
Use 7 # 7 ( 1 layer )
GOVERNING CASE ANALYSIS
0.003
27.6
d'
2.4
0.85
max
0.0134
in
0.90
ES
29000
in
min
0.0033
w = As =
0.0063
b wd
AS
ksi
30
Case 1
Case 2
Case 4
Case 3
CASE 2 APPLICABLE
FLEXURAL ANALYSIS
Case 1 Analysis :
a = d d2
2M u
=
0.85 b f C '
AS =
in
0.85ab f C '
=
fy
in
Case 2 Analysis :
a = d d2
2
h
Mu
(b b w ) h f d f
2
b w 0.85f f C '
2.72
AS =
in
0.85 f C ' ( ab w + bh f b wh f )
f
0.75 1 ud
=
fy
u +
ES
A S = AS '
AS ' =
in
f S ' 0.85 f C ' ba

+
=
fy
fy
f S ' = E S u
in2
M u 0.85 f C ' ba d
f S ' ( d d ')
a 1d '
=
a
2.31
in2
Case 3 Analysis :
a=
a
2
in2
in2
ksi
Case 4 Analysis :
a=
AS = AS '
0.75 1 ud
=
fy
u +
ES
a
h
+ 0.85 f C ' (b b w ) h f d f
2
2
f S ' ( d d ')
M u 0.85 f C ' b wa d
in
AS ' =
f S ' 0.85 f C ' ( b b w ) h f + a bw

+
=
fy
fy
in2
f S ' = E S u
a 1d '
=
a
ksi
(cont'd)
SHEAR ANALYSIS
V u 10 b wd f c
Determine concrete capacity (ACI 11.3.1.1 or 11.3.2.1)
'
46.4
where
<
=
281.1
0.85
V C = 2b wd
[Satisfactory]
where
for V u < V c
2
50b w
V c
, for
V u V c
2
f y
0 ,
=
Re qD
V u V c
,
df y
A = MIN
72.06
54.07
, 1.0 =
0.391
'
c
d
B = MIN V u
Mu
k ,<== applicable
, 100 =
for V c V u
2
in / ft
0.240
66.15
V C = (1.9 A + 2500 wB ) b wd =
Check shear reinforcement (ACI 11.5)
Av
s
'
fc=
Av
s
<
= 0.960
in2 / ft
[Satisfactory]
Pr ovD
Check spacing limits for shear reinforcement (ACI 11.5.4)
Vs=
V u V C
-17.48
d
'
, 24) for V s 4b wd f c
2
S max, shear =
d
'
MIN (
, 12) for V s > 4b wd f c
4
MIN (
13
>
S=
[Satisfactory]
10
in
TORSION ANALYSIS
Vu
b wd
T u Ph
+
1.7 A2
oh
0.412
0.425
<
where
V C + 8 f 'c
b wd
0.85
Ph =
80
Aoh =
391
(ACI 9.3.2.3)
in, (perimeter of centerline of outermost closed
transverse torsional reinforcement.)
in2 (area enclosed by centerline of the outermost
closed transverse torsional reinforcement.)
[Satisfactory]
Check if torsional reinforcement required (ACI 11.6.1)

where
Acp
P cp
Tu f c
'
110.0
>
17.0
ft-k
Torsional reinforcement reqD.
be = MIN(h-hf , 4hf) =
Pcp =
108
Acp =
720
in, (one side, ACI 6.1.1)
in, (outside perimeter of the concrete cross

section.)
2
in (area enclosed by outside perimeter of
concrete cross section.)
Check the max factored torque causing cracking (ACI 11.6.2.2)
T u 4
Acp
P cp
'
c
110.0
>
68.0
Torsional reinforcement reqD for full torque.
Determine the area of one leg of a closed stirrup (ACI 11.6.3.6)
At = T u
s 2 A0 f
=
yv
Tu
1.7 A0 h f
0.00
in2 / ft
yv
Determine the corresponding area of longitudinal reinforcement (derived from ACI 11.6.3.7 & 11.6.5.3)
A L = MAX
'
At f yv , 5 Acp f c f yv MAX At , 25b w
Ph
Ph
s
s
f yL
f yL
f yL
f yv
0.00
in
(cont'd)
Determine minimum combined area of longitudinal reinforcement
in2
AL, top = As' +0.5AL =
0.00
<
actual
[Satisfactory]
AL, bot = As +0.5AL =
[Satisfactory]
2.31
in2
actual
<
Determine minimum diameter for longitudinal reinforcement (ACI 11.6.6.2)

dbL = MAX(S/24, 0.375) =
0.42
in
0.88
<
Determine minimum combined area of stirrups (ACI 11.6.5.2 & 11.6.6.1)

2
in / ft
<
0.24
At / S = MAX[(Av+2At)S, 50bw/fyv] =
Smax, tor = MIN[(Ph/8, 12) =
SreqD = MIN(Smax,shear , Smax,tor) =
10
in
[Satisfactory]
actual
[Satisfactory]
actual
[Satisfactory]
in
10
in
>
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Deep Beam Design

INPUT DATA
CONCRETE STRENGTH
REBAR YIELD STRESS
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
WIDTH
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
CLEAR SPAN
fc'
fy
Vu
Mu
b
d
Ln
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
3
60
120
200
12
32
12
ksi
ksi
k
ft-k
in
in
ft
VERTICAL REINF.
in o.c.
HORIZONTAL REINF.
10
in o.c.
TENSION REINFORCEMENT
ANALYSIS
CHECK SECTION
2.5
>
3.5
2.5M u
V ud
[SATISFACTORY]
1.94
[ACI 11-29]
CHECK CAPACITY
V c = MIN
3.5
2.5M u
V ud
'
1.9 f c +
2500 AsV u
bd , 6bd
bM u
'
fc
84.63
(ACI Sec. 11.8.7)
Ln
Ln
Av 1 +
Av h 11
d
d
+
V s = f yd
12 s
12 h
57.73
(ACI Sec. 11.8.8)
(V c + V s ) =
121.01
(ACI Sec. 11.1.1)
>
Vu =
[SATISFACTORY]
120.00
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Slab Punching Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
16
in
COLUMN DEPTH
c2
16
in
SLAB CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
ksi
SLAB THICKNESS
16
in
Td
in
#
#
10
5
each way
DROP CAP / PANEL THICKNESS

BAR SIZE AT TOP SLAB
PUNCHING REINFORCING
ANALYSIS
PUNCHING CAPACITY FOR COLUMN (ACI 318-02 SEC.11.5.6.4, 11.12.1.2, & 11.12.6)
P u , col ( 2 + y )
where
f c A p + MIN Av f y sin , 3b 0d
'
'
fc =
=
=
0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

ratio of long side to short side of concentrated load =
T + T c - 2" cover - 2 (0.5 db) =
20.73
b0
2b1 + 2b2 = 2(c1 + d) + 2(c2 + d) =
Ap
b0 d
MIN(2 , 4 / c , 40 d / b0)
Av
2.48
45
fy
60
ksi
3046
in
146.9
in2
=
2.0
in2
PUNCHING CAPACITY FOR POINT LOAD (ACI 318-02 SEC.11.12.1.2, & 11.12.6)
P u, point 4
where
683.089 kips
'
f cAp =
96.6 kips
T - 2" cover - 2 (0.5 db) =
b0
d=
Ap
b0 d
0.75
(ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

39.99 in
=
509
in2
12.73
in
in
1.00
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Slab Punching Design Based on ACI 318-02

INPUT DATA
COLUMN DIAMETER
22
in
SLAB CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
ksi
SLAB THICKNESS
16
in
Td
in
#
#
10
8
each way
DROP CAP / PANEL THICKNESS

BAR SIZE AT TOP SLAB
PUNCHING REINFORCING
ANALYSIS
PUNCHING CAPACITY FOR COLUMN (ACI 318-02 SEC.11.5.6.4, 11.12.1.2, & 11.12.6)
P u , col 4
where
'
f c A p + MIN A v f y sin
, 3b 0d
T + T c - 2" cover - 2 (0.5 db) =
b0
(D + d) =
Ap
b0 d
0.75
'
fc =
(ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )
134.2
in
2783
in2
20.73
in
12.64 in
Av
45
fy
60
ksi
PUNCHING CAPACITY FOR POINT LOAD (ACI 318-02 SEC.11.12.1.2, & 11.12.6)
P u, point 4
where
'
f cAp =
96.6 kips
T - 2" cover - 2 (0.5 db) =
b0
d=
Ap
b0 d
0.75
(ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

39.99 in
=
509
in2
12.73
in
1056
kips
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Coupling Beam Design Based on ACI 318-02 / IBC 2003

INPUT DATA
f c'
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
Vu
254
CONCRETE STRENGTH
ksi
WIDTH
16
in
OVERALL DEPTH
72
in
CLEAR SPAN
ft
DIAGONAL BARS, Ad
9
4
DIAGONAL TIES, Ash
HORIZONTAL BARS, Avh

VERTICAL TIES, Av
16
legs #
72
( 2 layers @ 10 in o.c. )
6
in o.c.
ANALYSIS
CHECK DIAGONAL BARS REQUIREMENT (ACI 318-02, 21.7.7.2 & 21.7.7.3)

L/h=
Vu
<
<
1.00
4
2
V n = 4 bh
<
'
c
291
[Coupling Beam Permitted]
CHECK DIAGONAL BARS (ACI 318-02, 21.7.7.4)

Vu
V n = MIN (2 f y Ad sin , 10bh f 'c ) =
<
255 k
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TIES AROUND DIAGONAL BARS (ACI 318-02, 21.4.4)
A sh = MAX
'
'
0.3sh c f c A g
1
fy
A ch
0.09 sh c f c
=
fy
0.384
in2
<
A sh, provd
[Satisfactory]
CHECK VERTICAL TIES (ACI 318-02, 11.8.5)
Av = 0.0015bs =
0.144
in2
Av , provd
<
[Satisfactory]
CHECK HORIZONAL BARS (ACI 318-02, 11.8.4)
Avh = 0.0025bh =
0.383
in
Av , provd
<
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE LONGITUDIANL BARS (ACI 318-02, 10.5.1)
A s ,min = MAX
3bd f 'c
200bd
,
fy
f y
3.07
in
==> ( 4 #
longitudinal bars both top & bottom)
(Note: These bars are not recommended by SEAOC to be used, and are not shown in figure above.)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Coupling Beam Design Based on CBC 2001 / UBC 1997

INPUT DATA
fc '
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
Vu
CONCRETE STRENGTH
ksi
60
ksi
254
WIDTH
16
in
OVERALL DEPTH
72
in
CLEAR SPAN
ft
16
legs #
DIAGONAL BARS, Ad
DIAGONAL TIES, Ash
HORIZONTAL BARS, Avh

VERTICAL TIES, Av
16
( 2 layers @ 10 in o.c. )
6
in o.c.
ANALYSIS
CHECK DIAGONAL BARS REQUIREMENT (SEC.1921.6.10.2)

L/d=
1.02
<
where
d=
70.25
Vu
<
4
in
V n = 4 bd f 'c =
284
[Coupling Beam Permitted]
CHECK DIAGONAL BARS (SEC.1921.6.10.2)

Vu
<
V n = MIN (2 f y A d sin , 10bd f 'c ) =
255 k
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TIES AROUND DIAGONAL BARS (SEC. 1921.4.4)
A sh = MAX
'
0.3sh c f c A g
1
fy
Ach
'
0.09 sh c f c
=
fy
0.384
in2
<
A sh, provd
[Satisfactory]
CHECK VERTICAL TIES (SEC. 1911.8.9)
Av = 0.0015bs =
0.144
in2
Av , provd
<
[Satisfactory]
CHECK HORIZONAL BARS (SEC. 1911.8.10)
Avh = 0.0025bh =
0.383
in2
Av , provd
<
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE LONGITUDIANL BARS (SEC. 1910.5.1)

'
3bd f c
200bd
,
A s ,min = MAX
fy
f y
3.07
in2
==> ( 4 #
longitudinal bars both top & bottom)
(Note: These bars are not recommended by SEAOC to be used, and are not shown in figure above.)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Concrete Column Design Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
4.2
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
COLUMN DIMENSIONS
cx
36
in
cy
40
in
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD
Pu
1700 k
FACTORED MAGNIFIED MOMENT

FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
SHEAR REINF.
Mu,x
800
ft-k
Mu,y
100
ft-k
Vu,x
130
=
#
#
@
@
150
10
10
12
12
k
at x dir.
(Total 30 # 10)
at y dir.
in o.c., x dir.
in o.c., y dir.
Vu,y
COLUMN VERT. REINF.
8
9
4
4
4 legs,#
2 legs,#
ANALYSIS
o =
4000
3500
3000
Pn (k)
2 0.85 f
2000
1500
AT
AT
AT
AT
AT
1000
500
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Mn (ft-k)
Ec
0.85 f
'
C
, E c = 57
c
c
o
o
AXIAL LOAD ONLY

MAXIMUM LOAD
0 % TENSION
25 % TENSION
50 % TENSION

where =
0.65
Ag =
1440
a = Cb 1 =
, E s = 29000ksi
for 0 < c < o
Pn (kips)
3791
3791
3343
2773
2290
Mn (ft-kips)
0
1058
1492
1958
2251
2583
AT t = 0.002
1564
1521
2609
AT t = 0.005
667
3275
2726
AT FLEXURE ONLY
=
806.226 ft-k, (combined bending load.)
'
C
'
C
Mu = ( u,x2 + Mu,y2 )0.5 =
, for c o
,
for s y
sE s
=
,
for
f y
s > y
0.85 f
2500
'
C
7.13
, (the direction of combined load.)
>
(ACI 318-02, Sec.9.3.2.2)

in2.
Ast =
Pu
[Satisfactory]
2
38.10 in .
20 in (at balanced strain condition, ACI 10.3.2)
= 0.48 + 83 t =
where
0.652
(ACI 318-02, Fig. R9.3.2)
Cb = d c / (c + s) =
24
t =
in
1 =
d = 41.2149 in, (ACI 7.7.1)
0.84
Mn = 0.9 n = 2726
ft-kips @ Pn = 0, (ACI 318-02, Sec. 9.3.2) ,&
Mn =
ft-kips @ Pu =
2521
1700
max
0.08
(ACI 318-02, Section 10.9)
min
0.01
(ACI 318-02, Section 10.9)
0.003
t,min = 0.004, (ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.3.5)

Mu
>
kips
provd
c =
0.002069
( ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.2.7.3 )
[Satisfactory]
0.026
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.1.1, 11.3.1, & 11.5.6.2)
Vn = (Vs + Vc)
(ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.1.1)
>
where =
0.75
Vu
[Satisfactory]
(ACI 318-02 Sec. 9.3.2.3)

A0
1345
1335
Av
0.80
0.40
Vc =
fy =
x
y
d
37.37
33.37
smax
18
(ACI 318-02, Section 10.16.8.5)
smin
(ACI 318-02, Section 7.10.4.3)
60
0.5
2 (fc') A0
174.4
173.0
ksi
Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 4Vc)
149.5
66.7
sprovd
12
in
[Satisfactory]
Vn
243
180
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Magnified Moment Calculation for Concrete Column Based on ACI 318-02

EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTOR
1.6
COLUMN UNSUPPORTED LENGTH
Lu
12
, (ACI 10.12.1 or 10.13.1)

ft
LARGER FACTORED MOMENT
M2
200
ft-k
ft-k, (positive if single curvature.)
SMALLER FACTORED END MOMENT
M1
100
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
ksi
COLUMN DIMENSIONS
h
b
=
=
20
20
in
in
Pu
400
SUMMATION FOR ALL VERTICAL LOADS IN THE STORY
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD
Pu
1200
SUMMATION FOR ALL CRITICAL LOADS IN THE STORY
Pc
13600 k, (ACI Eq. 10-10)
THE MAGNIFIED MOMENT:
Mu
236.7
ft-k
, Sway
ANALYSIS
MAGNIFIED MOMENT - NONSWAY
r = 0.3 h =
6.0
k Lu / r =
>
38.4
in, ACI 10.11.2

34 - 12(M1 / M2) =
Ec = 57000 (fc')0.5 =
3605.0 ksi, ACI 8.5.1
Ig = b h3 / 12 =
13333
EI =
0.4 E c I g
1+ d
Pc =
0.4 E c I g
1 + 0.6
2EI =
( k Lu )2
= 0.25E c I g =
2
1E+07 k-in , ACI 10.12.3
2234.2 k, ACI Eq (10-10)
M2,min = MAX[ M2 , Pu (0.6+0.03 h) ] =
Cm
, 1.0 =
Pu
0.75P c
Mu, ns = ns M2, min =
< = = Slenderness effect must be considered. (ACI 10.12.2)
in4
200
Cm = MAX[ 0.6 + 0.4 (M1 / M2, min) , 0.4 ] =
ns = MAX
28
210.2
1.05
ft-k, ACI 10.12.3.2

0.8
, ACI 10.12.3.1
, ACI Eq (10-9)
>
ft-k, ACI Eq (10-8)
1.05 M2 =
210.0
ft-k
[Unsatisfactory]
,(ACI 10.11.4.1)
The column is sway. See calculation as follows.

MAGNIFIED MOMENT - SWAY
k Lu / r =
>
38.4
22
1
, 1.0
Pu
1
0.75 P c
s = MIN MAX 36
Ag = b h =
400
Lu / r =
24.00
M2s = M2 =
200.0
M2ns =
5%
Mu, s = M2ns + s M2s =

Note:
, 2.5 =
1.13
, ACI Eq (10-18) & 10.13.6 (c)
in2
<
35 / [Pu / (fc' Ag)]0.5 =
70.00
[Satisfactory]
, (ACI 10.13.5)
ft-k, as given
M2s =
236.7
10.0
ft-k, assumed conservatively
ft-k, ACI Eq (10-16)
For column subject to bending about both principal axis, the moment about each axis shall be magnified separately based
on the conditions corresponding to that axis. (ACI 10.11.6)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Rectangular Concrete Column Design
INPUT DATA
f 'c
ksi
fy
x
y
Bar Size
No. of Asx
=
=
=
==>
=
60
48
32
11
8
ksi
in
in
No. of Asy
Total Bars
=
==>
=
DATE :
8 # 11
9
30 # 11
3.0%
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
9 # 11
Pu
1700
Mux
2900
ft-k
ex
20.5
in
Muy
1200
ft-k
ey
8.5
in
CHECK COLUMN CAPACITY BY THE BRESLER METHOD
Pn
Pu ( 0.80 )( 0.70 ) P o
1
P ox
1700.0
4407.9 ok
<
2428.6
1
1
P oy
M ny
M nx
+
1.0
M nox M noy
Po
3145.4 ok
<
ANALYSIS
0.003
1.199
>
x DIRECTION
45.295
2.705
12.48
32
1.0
NG
y DIRECTION
0.70
d
d'
As
b
=
=
=
=
in
in
2
in
29.295
2.705
14.04
48
Mn
4142.9 ft-k
1714.3 ft-k
0.85
Mno
5485.1 ft-k
3864.7 ft-k
Po
3820.9 k
5457.1 k
4.10078 in
3.70173 in
29612.2 psi
23425.7 psi
4034.01 ft-k
3052.89 ft-k
in
in
in
2
in
in
MOMENT STRENGTH (Pn=0)
c=
'
As f y As u E s +
'
( As f y A's u E s ) + 3.4 f b A E d
2
'
c
'
s
1.7 1 f c' b
f s = E s u
cd'
=
c
'
M n = 0.85 f c 1cb d
1c
2
+ A's f s ( d d ' ) =
'
'
AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH (Mn=0)

'
P o = 0.85 f c( A g A st ) + A st f y =
7871.28 k
7871.28 k
BALANCED CONDITION
ab =
u E s 1d
=
uE s + f y
'
f sb = u E s 1
22.7862 in
'
d uEs + f
d
uEs
60000 psi
'
'
'
P b = 0.85 f cb a b + As f sb A s f y =
'
M b = 0.85 f cb a b
h ab
h
+ A s' f 'sb
d ' As f
2 2
2
d
h =
2
14.7372 in
60000 psi
2479.13 k
2405.11 k
5515.32 ft-k
3881.41 ft-k
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Circular Column Design Based on ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
REBAR YIELD STRESS
COLUMN DIAMETER
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD
FACTORED MAGNIFIED MOMENT
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
COLUMN VERT. REINF.
COLUMN SPIRAL REINF.
#
fc'
fy
D
Pu
Mu
Vu
8
3
=
=
=
=
=
=
#
@
5
60
20
480
200
20
7
3
ksi
ksi
in
k
ft-k
k
in o.c.
ANALYSIS
o =
1200
1000
800
Pn (k)
600
400
2 0.85 f
'
C
Ec
0.85 f
'
C
0.85 f
'
C
sE s ,
f y ,
, E c = 57
c c
o
o
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Mn (ft-k)
'
C
, E s = 29000ksi
for 0 < c < o
for c o
for s y
for s > y
,
AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY

AT MAXIMUM LOAD
200
Pn (kips)
954
954
AT 0 % TENSION
768
159
AT 25 % TENSION
638
197
AT 50 % TENSION
528
216
AT t = 0.002
366
227
360
230
AT t = 0.005
152
232
165
AT FLEXURE ONLY

where
Ag =
a = Cb 1 =
0.709
4.80
Pu
165
Mn =
ft-kips @ Pu =
219
10
in
17.7 in, (ACI 7.7.1)
Mn = 0.9 n =
t =
0.002069
1 =
0.8
ft-kips @ Pn = 0, (ACI 318-02, Sec. 9.3.2) ,&

480
0.08 (ACI 318-02, Section 10.9)
min
0.01 (ACI 318-02, Section 10.9)
provd
c =
0.003
( ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.2.7.3 )
t,min = 0.004, (ACI 318-02, Sec. 10.3.5)
>
kips
max
Mu
[Satisfactory]
0.015
[Satisfactory]
Vn = (Vs + Vc) =
where
[Satisfactory]
in2.
(ACI 318-02, Fig. R9.3.2)
Cb = d c / (c + s) =
d
>
Ast =
in (at balanced strain condition, ACI 10.3.2)
= 0.57 + 67 t =
where
0.70 (ACI 318-02, Sec.9.3.2.2)

2
314 in .
=
A0 =
65
kips, (ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.1.1)
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
0.75 (ACI 318-02 Sec. 9.3.2.3)
2
Av = 0.22
246 in .
Vc =
2 (fc')0.5A0 =
Vs =
MIN (d fy Av / s , 4Vc) =
34.7
in2.
fy =
40
ksi
in
kips, (ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.3.1)

51.9
smax
(ACI 318-02, Section 7.10.4.3)
smin
(ACI 318-02, Section 7.10.4.3)
kips, (ACI 318-02 Sec. 11.5.6.2)

sprovd
Mn (ft-kips)
0
80
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Magnified Moment Calculation for Circular Column Based on ACI 318-02

EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTOR
COLUMN UNSUPPORTED LENGTH
Lu
12
, (ACI 10.12.1 or 10.13.1)

ft
LARGER FACTORED MOMENT
M2
200
ft-k
SMALLER FACTORED END MOMENT
M1
12
ft-k, (positive if single curvature.)
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
ksi
COLUMN DIAMETER
20
in
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD
Pu
400
SUMMATION FOR ALL VERTICAL LOADS IN THE STORY
Pu
1200
SUMMATION FOR ALL CRITICAL LOADS IN THE STORY
Pc
13600 k, (ACI Eq. 10-10)
THE MAGNIFIED MOMENT:
Mu
200.0
ft-k
, Nonsway
ANALYSIS
MAGNIFIED MOMENT - NONSWAY
r = 0.25 D =
5.0
k Lu / r =
<
28.8
in, ACI 10.11.2

34 - 12(M1 / M2) = 33.28 < = = Slenderness effect may be ignored. (ACI 10.12.2)
Ec = 57000 (fc')0.5 =
3605.0 ksi, ACI 8.5.1
Ig = D4 / 64 =
7854
EI =
0.4 E c I g
1+ d
Pc =
0.4 E c I g
1 + 0.6
2EI =
2
in4
= 0.25E c I g =
2
7E+06 k-in , ACI 10.12.3
3369.1 k, ACI Eq (10-10)
( k Lu )
M2,min = MAX[ M2 , Pu (0.6+0.03 D) ] =
200
Cm = MAX[ 0.6 + 0.4 (M1 / M2, min) , 0.4 ] =
ns = MAX
Cm
, 1.0 =
Pu
0.75P c
Mu, ns = ns M2, min =
200.0
1.00
ft-k, ACI 10.12.3.2

0.624
, ACI 10.12.3.1
, ACI Eq (10-9)
<
ft-k, ACI Eq (10-8)
1.05 M2 =
210.0
ft-k
[Satisfactory]
,(ACI 10.11.4.1)
The column is nonsway. Ignore following calculations.

MAGNIFIED MOMENT - SWAY
k Lu / r =
s = MIN MAX 7
314
Lu / r =
28.80
M2s = M2 =
200.0
22
1
, 1.0
Pu
0.75 P c
Ag = D2 / 4 =
M2ns =
< = = Not apply
>
28.8
5%
Mu, s = M2ns + s M2s =
<
, 2.5 =
1.13
, ACI Eq (10-18) & 10.13.6 (c)
in2
35 / [Pu / (fc' Ag)]0.5 =
62.04
ft-k, as given
M2s =
236.7
10.0
ft-k, assumed conservatively
ft-k, ACI Eq (10-16)
[Satisfactory]
, (ACI 10.13.5)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Design of Column Supporting Discontinuous System Based on IBC 2003 / CBC 2001
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc' =
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS

COLUMN CLEAR HEIGHT
COLUMN SIZE
fy =
h =
c1 =
60
16
24
ksi
ft
in
c2 =
R =
0 =
24
5.5
2.8
in
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT (Tab 16-N)

AMPLIFICATION FACTOR (Tab 16-N)
S =
0.2
in
DESIGN LEVEL STORY DISPLACEMENT

COLUMN LOADS, ASD (ft-kips, kips)
Mtop
P
DL
40
0
LL
20
0
E/1.4
100
80
SECTION
LEFT
4
(d =
RIGHT
TOP
#
21.50
( 1 Layer)
4
#
( d = 21.50
( 1 Layer)
V
0
0
20
8
in )
8
in )
TRANSVERSE REINFORCMENT FOR CONFINEMENT

3 Legs #
4
@
Mbot
0
0
80
BOTTOM
#
21.50
( 1 Layer)
4
#
( d = 21.50
( 1 Layer)
4
(d =
8
in )
8
in )

5
in, o.c., full height (ACI 318-02 4.4.5 / CBC 1921.4.4.5)
ANALYSIS
DESIGN CRITERIA
1. since the column supported reaction from discontinued stiff member, CBC 1633.2.4 &1921.4.4.5 apply.
2. since the column is not part of the lateral force resisting system, CBC 1921.7 apply.
3. since the column Ld required into top & 12" at least into footing per CBC 1921.4.4.5, a fixed-fixed condition should be used..
DESIGN LOADS
U1 = 1.2 D + f1 L +1.0 0 Eh
U2 = 0.9 D 1.0 0 Eh , (CBC 1630.8.2.1, 12-18 & 30-2)
, (CBC 1630.8.2.1, 12-17 & 30-2)
Pu =
450.0
kips
Mu,top =
313.6
ft-kips
Pu =
428.0
kips
Mu,top =
313.6
ft-kips
Vu =
78.4
kips
Mu,bot =
313.6
ft-kips
Vu =
78.4
kips
Mu,bot =
313.6
ft-kips
f1 =
0.5
U3 = 1.4 D + 1.7 L
, (CBC 1909.2.1)
Pu =
90.0
kips
Mu,top =
0.0
ft-kips
Vu =
0.0
kips
Mu,bot =
0.0
ft-kips
CHECK CAPACITY SUBJECTED TO BENDING AND AXIAL LOAD

LOADING
U1,top
U1,bot
U2,top
U2,bot
U3,top
U3,bot
Pu (kips)
450.0
450.0
428.0
428.0
90.0
90.0
Mu (ft-kips)
313.6
313.6
313.6
313.6
0.0
0.0
ns = Cm/[1-Pu/(0.75Pc)]
nsMu (ft-kips)
Mn (ft-kips) @ Pu
1.116
1.116
1.110
1.110
1.021
1.021
where
349.9
349.9
348.0
348.0
0.0
0.0
419.8
474.9
476.2
476.2
404.7
404.7
EI = 0.4EcIg / (1+d) = 0.25 EcIg

Pc = 2EI / (kLu)2
SUMMARY OF LOAD VERSUS MOMENT CAPACITIES (for ACI 318-02 10.2 & 10.3 only)
CAPACITY
AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY
AT MAXIMUM LOAD
AT 0 % TENSION
AT 25 % TENSION
AT 50 % TENSION
AT t = 0.002
AT t = 0.005
AT FLEXURE ONLY
Pn (kips)
1047
1047
893
745
622
431
420
256
0
Mn (ft-kips)
0
175
272
336
376
425
428
537
405
Pn (kips)
(cont'd)
1200
1000
800
24
600
400
200
Mn (ft-kips)
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
All load points to be within capacity diagram.
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE INDUCED MOMENT IN THE COLUMN
M col
6E cI c M
where
h2
+ P =
452.6664 ft-kips, at top & bot of column
E c = 57000 (fc')0.5 =
3122
ksi, ACI 318-02 8.5.1 / CBC 1908.5.1
I g = c1 c23 / 12 =
27648
in4
I c = 0.5 I g =
13824
4
in , CBC 1633.2.4
M = MAX( 0.7 R s , 0.0025 h) =
0.77
in, CBC (30-17) & 1633.2.4
P = PDL + PLL =
60
kips, CBC 1633.2.4
= 0.5 M =
0.39
in, CBC (30-17)
CHECK REQUIREMENTS OF NOT PART OF THE LATERAL RESISTING SYSTEM

M u = 1.2 MDL + 1.0 MLL + Mcol =
452.6664 ft-kips, (CBC 1921.7.2, Mu = 1.4 MDL + 1.4 MLL + Mcol )
>
Pu, max =
Mn =
404.7
kips
[Satisfactory]
450.0
kips
>
0.1Agfc' =
172.8 kips
[Satisfactory]
Per ACI 318-02 21.11.3.3 / CBC 1921.7.3.3, the column shall satisfy ACI 318-02 21.4.4, 21.4.5 and 21.5.2.1.
CHECK SECTION REQUIREMENTS (ACI 318-02 21.4.1 / CBC 1921.4.1)

cmin =MIN(c1, c2) =
24
cmin / cmax =
>
in
>
1.00
12
0.4
in
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TRANSVERSE REINFORCING AT END OF COLUMN (ACI 318-02 21.4.4 / CBC 1921.4.4)
2
in
Ash =
0.60
>
MAX[ 0.09shcfc' / fyh , 0.3shc(Ag/Ach-1)fc' / fyh ] =
[Satisfactory]
where
s = MAX[MIN(c1/4, 6db, 4+(14-hx)/3, 6), 4] =

hc = c1 - 2Cover - dt =
Ach = (c1-3)(c2-3) =
CHECK FLEXURAL REINFORCING (ACI 318-02 21.4.3.1 / CBC 1921.4.3.1)
total = 0.018
>
<
min =
max =
0.47
0.010
[Satisfactory]
0.060
[Satisfactory]
441.0
20.5
in
5
in
in
in2
CHECK SHEAR STRENGTH (ACI 318-02 21.4.5 / CBC 1921.4.5)

Ve = MAX[ (Mpr, left, top + Mpr, right,bot) / Hn , Vu,max] =
where
top,left =
bot,left =
0.006
0.006
114.5
kips
8(fc')0.5c2d =
<
<
>
>
169.6
[2(fc')0.5c2d + Avfyd / s] =
kips
[Satisfactory]
158.5
kips
min=MIN[3(fc')0.5/fy, 200/fy ]= 0.003

min =
0.003
[Satisfactory]
Mpr, left, top = 1.25Mn,col,max =
916
ft-kips
Mpr, right, bot = 1.25Mn,col,max =
916
ft-kips
Av =
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
0.75
0.6
(0.85, if CBC 1909.3.2.3)

in2
DETERMINE SEISMIC TENSION DEVELOPMENT, Ld, INTO THE TOP PER ACI 318-02 21.4.4.5 / CBC 1921.4.4.5
L dh = MAX
db f
65
'
c
, 8d b , 6 in =
L d = MAX ( 3.5 L dh , 12 in ) =
where
db
17 db
59 db
1.0
59
17
in, (ACI 318-02 21.5.4.1)
in, (ACI 318-02 21.5.4.2)
in
, (1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-02 21.5.4.4 & 12.2.4)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Corbel Design Based on IBC 03 / ACI 318-02

CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD
Vu
80
FACTORED TENSILE LOAD
N uc
40
b
d
h
a
=
=
=
=
15
20
22
4
in
in
in
in
hc
12
in
3
3
#
#
7
3
( spacing 4 in o.c. )
WIDTH
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
OVERALL DEPTH
SHEAR SPAN
EDGE DEPTH
PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT
CLOSED STIRRUPS
ANALYSIS
CHECK DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (ACI Sec. 11.9.1 & 11.9.2)
<
1
[SATISFACTORY]
a/d =
0.20
Nuc / Vu =
<
1
[SATISFACTORY]
0.50
hc = 12.00
>
0.5 d [SATISFACTORY]
CHECK SECTION (ACI Sec. 11.9.3.2.1)
MIN (0.2 f 'cbd , 0.8 bd )
<
Vu
where
= 180 k
[SATISFACTORY]
0.75
CHECK REINFORCEMENT
A n = MAX
0.2V u
f y
0.75
N uc
0.889
in
Avf =
Vu
(ACI Sec. 11.9.3.4)

where
0.85bd f
'
c
1 1
Af =
Mu
0.383b d 2 f
'
c
1.270
in
(ACI Sec. 11.7.4.3)

=
1.4
M u = V ua + N uc ( h d )
2
= 0.373 in
400
in-k
(ACI Sec. 10.2)
A s = MAX
A f + An ,
2 Avf
0.04 f 'c
+ An ,
bd
3
f y
1.735
in
(ACI Sec. 11.9.3.5)
Ah =
A s An
2
0.423
(ACI Sec. 11.9.4)
in2
<
A h , provd =
[SATISFACTORY]
0.660
in2
<
A s , provd =
1.800
[SATISFACTORY]
in
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
T. Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Prestressed Composite Section Design

FLANGE STRENGTH
fc,'f
=
3
ksi
=
6
ksi
GIRDER STRENGTH
fc,'w
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
=
60
ksi
EFFECTIVE SPAN
L
=
25
ft
GIRDER SPACING
S
=
2.5
ft
=
4
in
GIRDER WIDTH
bw
=
2
in
FLANGE DEPTH
hf
GIRDER DEPTH
hw
=
10
in
=
16
k
FACTORED SECTION SHEAR Vu
PROPPED ? (1=YES, 2=NO)
=
2
No
INTERFACE TIES
2
#
4
@
16 in o.c.
CONTACT SURFACES (1=CLEAR, 2=INTENTIONALLY ROUGHENED)
2
Intentionally Roughened
EFFECTIVE PRESTRESS
Pe
=
52
k
REMOVAL OF PROPS
MProp
=
3.3
ft-k
FORMWORK
MSht
GIRDER SELF WEIGHT
MG
FLANGE CONCRETE
MF
=
5
ft-k
SUPERIMPOSED D+L
MW
=
=
=
8.58
2
15.5
ft-k
ft-k
ft-k
=
=
=
40
in2
in2
in3
ANALYSIS
FLANGE MODULUS
GIRDER MODULUS
MODULAR RATIO, Ew / Ef
b f ( eff ) = MIN
yc =
S ct =
=
=
=
3122
4415
I cc =
hc y c
v = Av =
b ws
80b wd
30.0
S ci =
3
278 in
min =
>
( 260 + 0.6
I cc =
hw yc
50
=
fy
) b d
fci(flan)
fci(web)
=
=
=
=
=
=
1.854
0.746
0.412
-0.458
0.201
2.138
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
'
>
6 f c
<
0.6 f 'c
[SATISFACTORY]
I+
A y 2 y c2
3
569 in
Ac
Ic
Sb = Sb
b f ( eff )
=
n
A=
S cb =
333
66.67
21.2 in
4
1089 in
I cc =
yc
3
135 in
0.001
, 500bwd
MIN Avf f y , 0.2 f c' Ac , 800 Ac
ft
fb
fct
fcb
b f ( trans ) =
in
I cc =
8.09 in
0.006
GIRDER PROPERTIES :
ksi
ksi
1.41
L
, b w + 16h f , S =
4
Ay
=
A
V nh = MIN
Ef
Ew
n
<= applicable
Vu
<
V nh =
[SATISFACTORY]
19.8 k
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Development of Reinforcement Based on ACI 318-02

NON-SEISMIC TENSION DEVELOPMENTS
L dh = MAX
requird 0.02 d b f
'
provided
fc
requird 0.075 d b f
provided
'
c + K tr
f
L d = MAX
L hk
where
required
12
in, (ACI 318-02 12.5.2)
26 db
20
in, (ACI 318-02 12.2.3)
, 12 in =
in, (ACI 318-02, Fig. R12.5)

#
15 db
db
12
Bar size
db
, 8d b , 6 in =
0.75
in
provided
60
ksi
fy
f'c
1.0
=
=
=
=
c
Ktr
(c + Ktr ) / db =
( A s,reqd / A s,provd , ACI 318-02, 12.2.5)
ksi
(1.3 for bottom cover more than 12", ACI 318-02 12.2.4)
1.0
0.8
1.0
(1.3 for light weight)
3.4
in, min(d' , 0.5s), (ACI 318-02, 12.2.4)
(Atr fyt / 1500 s n) =
0
(ACI 318-02, 12.2.4) , (50 bw / 1500 n, for CBC 2001)
2.5
0.7
< 2.5 , (ACI 318-02, 12.2.3)

(#11 or smaller, cover > 2.5" & side >2.0", ACI 318-02 12.5.3)
SEISMIC TENSION DEVELOPMENTS
L dh = MAX
db f
65 f c'
, 8d b , 6 in =
13
in
where
Bar size
(ACI 318-02 21.5.4.1)
L d = MAX (3.5L dh , 12 in ) =
L hk
17 db
12
59 db
44
in, (ACI 318-02 21.5.4.2)
db
0.75
in
fy
60
ksi
f'c
ksi
=
1.0
(1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-02 21.5.4.4 & 12.2.4)
in, (ACI 318-02, Fig. R12.5)
NON-SEISMIC COMPRESSION DEVELOPMENT
L dc = MAX
where
requird 0.02d b f
'
provided
fc
Bar size
db
required
fy
requird
0.3d b f
provided
, 8 in =
21 db
0.75
provided
0.95
60
ksi
f'c
1.0
16
in
(ACI 318-02 12.3)
in
(ACI 318-02 12.3.3 a)
ksi
(for spiral, 0.75, ACI 318-02 12.3.3 b)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Splice of Reinforcement Based on ACI 318-02

NON-SEISMIC TENSION SPLICE
ACI 318-02 Tab. R12.15.2
50% , Staggered
100% Lap
Class A
Class B
Class B
Class B
As,provd / As,reqd
2
<2
Ls
30 db
= 1.3 L d =
= 18
in
(for Class A, 1.0 L d , ACI 318-02, 12.15.1)
0.075 d b f
L d = MAX
where
c + K tr
db
'
fc
23 db
, 12 in =
Bar size
db
5
0.625
in
fy
60
ksi
ksi
f'c
1.0
=
=
=
=
=
c
Ktr
14
in
(ACI 318-02 12.15.1 & 12.2.3)
(1.3 for bottom cover more than 12", ACI 318-02 12.2.4)
1.0
0.8
1.0
(1.3 for light weight)
1.7
in, min(d' , 0.5s), s = see fig above, (ACI 318-02, 12.2.4)
(Atr fyt / 1500 s n) =
0
(ACI 318-02, 12.2.4) , (50 bw / 1500 n, for CBC 2001)
(c + Ktr ) / db =
2.5
< 2.5 , (ACI 318-02, 12.2.3)
SEISMIC TENSION SPLICE

Ls
66 db
= 1.3 L d =
= 42
in
(for Class A, 1.0 L d , ACI 318-02, 12.15.1)

L dh = MAX
db f
65
'
c
L d = MAX (3.5L dh , 12 in ) =
where
51 db
#
15 db
, 8d b , 6 in =
Bar size
db
5
0.625
in
fy
60
ksi
f'c
ksi
32
9
in
(ACI 318-02 21.5.4.1)
in, (ACI 318-02 21.5.4.2)
=
1.0
(1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-02 21.5.4.4 & 12.2.4)
NON-SEISMIC COMPRESSION SPLICE
L s = MAX 0.0005d b f y , 12 in =
where
Bar size
30 db
23
in, (ACI 318-02 12.16.1)
db
0.75
fy
60
ksi
f'c
ksi
1.0
in
(for fc' < 3 ksi, 4/3, ACI 318-02 12.16.1)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Shear Friction Reinforcing Design Based on ACI 318-02

FACTERED FRICTION FORCE
CONCRTET STRENGTH
REINFORCEMENT STRENGTH
=
=
=
500
kips
ksi
60
ksi
0.6
t
L
=
=
=
FRICTION COEFFICIENT [See Table below]

SHEAR PLANE THICKNESS
SHEAR PLANE LENGTH
DOWEL SIZE
Use
Vu
fc '
fy
Dowels
4.0
8
20
5
in
ft
in o.c.
ANALYSIS
CHECK SHEAR STRENGTH LIMITATION (Sec. 11.7.5)
Vn = MAX( 0.2fc' Ac , 800 Ac ) =

1152 kips
=
0.75 [Section 9.3.2.3]
2
Ac
=
1920 in
Where
>
Vu
[SATISFACTORY]
THE REQUIRED AREA OF SHEAR-TRANSFER REINFORCEMENT IS GIVEN BY SECTION R11.7.4.1 AS

2
Avf = Vu / (
fy ) =
18.5 in
COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION FOR NORMALWEIGHT CONCRETE [Sec.11.7.4.3]
Concrete place monolithically
Concrete placed against hardened concrete with surface intentionally roughened
Concrete placed against hardened concrete NOT intentionally roughened
Concrete anchored to as-rolled structural steel by headed stud or by reinforcing bars
1.40
1.00
0.60
0.70
<=
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Shear Friction Reinforcing Design Based on ACI 318-02

Ru
Ru
Tu
f c'
fy
a
b
FACTERED FRICTION FORCE VERTICAL

FACTERED FRICTION FORCE HORIZONTAL
CONCRTET STRENGTH
REINFORCEMENT STRENGTH
BEARING WIDTH
BEARING THICKNESS
REINFORCEMENT
=
=
=
=
=
=
- leg ties
ASSUME A POTENTIAL CRACK PLANE WITH AN ANGLE OF f =
86
kips
34
kips
ksi
60
ksi
5
18
3
in
in
70
degrees
5.0
in
Tu
14 in
Use
6
#
3
with (2) - leg closed ties
Distribute over a vert. distance of 14 in
ANALYSIS
FRICTION COEFFICIENT [Sec.11.7.4.3]
FORCES ON INCLINED PLANE:

Vu
= Ru sin f + Tu cos f = 92.4 kips
Where
Ac
Nu
=
=
0.75
268
1.4
<
Vn = MAX( 0.2fc' Ac , 800 Ac ) = 160.6 kips
[Section 9.3.2.3]
in2
Tu sin f - Ru cos f
[SATISFACTORY]
2.5 kips
SHEAR FRICTION REINFORCEMENT IS GIVEN BY EQ(11-26) AS

2
Avf =Vu / [ fy ( sin f + cos f )]
=
1.24 in
REINFORCEMENT TO RESIST TENSION IS GIVEN BY SEC. 11.7.7 AS
2
An = Nu / ( fy sin f)
=
0.06 in
TOTAL REINFORCEMENT:
As = Avf + An =
2
1.30 in
( net tension )
(Sec. 11.7.5)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Flexural Design for Prestressed Member

CONCRETE STRENGTH
REBAR STRENGTH
TENDON TENSILE STRENGTH
TENDON YIELD STRENGTH
COMPRESSION REINF.
TENSION REINF.
SHEAR STIRRUP REINF.
PRESTRESSING TENDONS
WIDTH OF COMPRESSION FACE
DIST. TO CENTROID OF COMPRESSION
DIST. TO CENTROID OF PRESTRESSED
DISTANCE TO CENTROID OF TENSION
HEIGHT OF SECTION
SPAN LENGTH
MOMENT DUE TO SELF-WEIGHT
MOMENT DUE TO DEAD LOAD
MOMENT DUE TO LIVE LOAD
SECTION LOCATION ( 0 or 1 )
PRESTRESSING METHOD ( 0, 1 or 2 )
FACTORED TORSIONAL MOMENT
f 'c
=
fy
=
fpu
=
=
fpy
3
#
4
#
2
legs, #
14 strends (each
b=
d' =
dp =
d=
h=
L=
MG =
MD =
ML =
Vu =
Tu =
6
60
270
243
8
8
4
0.5
20
3
22.5
25.5
28
82
45
250
125
0
2
175
240
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
8.50
560
2613
2613
-0.232
3.600
199.260
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
@
12
in o. c.
2
in area )
in diameter &
0.153
in
in
in
in
in
ft
ft-k
TENDON FORCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER PRESTRESS TRANSFER,
Pi =
ft-k
ft-k
TENDON FORCE AT SERVICE LOAD AFTER ALLOWANCE LOSSES, Pe =
at midspan
post-tensioned & bonded
k
k
Additional 4 #8 Longitudinal Reinforcement Required for Torsion
375 k
300 k
TRANSFER DESIGN STAGE

ECCENTRICITY
SECTION AREA
SECTION MODULUS OF TOP
SECTION MODULUS OF BOT.
MIN. TOP FIBER STRESS
MAX. BOT. FIBER STRESS
MAX. PERMISSIBLE STRESS
f ti = P i
f bi = P i
Ac
1
Ac
e
e
Sb
f si
MG
=
St
-0.343 ksi
MG =
Sb
1.683 ksi
St
e
Ac
St
Sb
- Fti
Fbi
Fsi
175.070 ksi
in
in2
3
in
in3
ksi
ksi
ksi
<
- Fti
[MIN. As' REQUIRED]
<
Fbi
[SATISFACTORY]
Fsi
<
(As')reqd
0.543 in
(As')provd
<
[SATISFACTORY]
[SATISFACTORY]
SERVICEABILITY DESIGN STAGE

Fte = 0.6fc'
3.600
ksi, for total loads
Fte, G+D = 0.45fc'
2.700
ksi, for sustained loads only
0.5
-0.465
ksi, for normal cover to ACI Sec. 7.7.3.1
MIN. TOP FIBER STRESS

MAX. BOT. FIBER STRESS
-Fbe = -6(fc')
(for 50% increased cover to ACI Sec. 7.7.3.2 & with deflection checked by cracked scetion properties.)
f te = P e
Ac
e
M + M D+ ML
+ G
=
St
St
1
e
+
+ MG MD =
St
Ac S t
f te, G+ D = P e
f be = P e
1
Ac
+
+
MG M D M L =
Sb
Sb
1.489 ksi
<
Fte
[SATISFACTORY]
0.915 ksi
<
Fte, G+D
[SATISFACTORY]
-0.417 ksi
>
-Fbe
[SATISFACTORY]
STRENGTH DESIGN STAGE

1
p
'
INDEX OF TENSION REINF.

INDEX OF COMPR. REINF.
INDEX OF PRESTR. REINF.
'
=
=
=
=
=
0.750
0.280
0.006
0.005
0.005
=
=
=
0.062
0.046
0.196
c = 0.003
0.85 f c'
a=1c
COMPRESSION ZONE FACTOR

TENDON TYPE FACTOR
RATIO OF TENSION REINF.
RATIO OF COMPR. REINF.
RATIO OF PRESTR. REINF.
A s' f y
0.85 f c' ab
STRESS IN BONDED TENDONS :
ps
= f
pu
A ps f ps
p
f pu d ( ' )
MIN p ' +
, 0.17
1
fc
dp
246.639 ksi
Asfy
STRESS IN UNBONDED TENDONS :
ps
= MIN f
a=
se
A ps f
M n = A ps f
+ 10 +
'
fc
, f y, f
100 p
se
+ 60 =
+ As f s As' f s
=
'
0.85 f cb
ps
ps
dp
a
+ As f
2
0.85a
5.64 in
a
+ As' f
2
Not applicable
dp
a
d '
2
785
ps
= p+
ft-k
= MIN f
d
dp
se
+10 +
( ) =
'
>
'
fc
, f y, f se + 30 =
300 p
0.21
<
0.361
[SATISFACTORY]
1.2 M cr = 1.2S b P e
[SATISFACTORY]
Not applicable
1
Ac
e
Sb
'
+ 7.5 f c =
547 ft-k
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Shear & Torsion Design for Prestressed Member

CONCRETE STRENGTH
f 'c
=
REBAR STRENGTH
fy
=
TENDON TENSILE STRENGTH
fpu
=
TENDON YIELD STRENGTH
fpy
=
COMPRESSION REINF.
3
#
TENSION REINF.
4
#
SHEAR STIRRUP REINF.
2
legs, #
PRESTRESSING TENDONS
14 strends (each
WIDTH OF COMPRESSION FACE
b=
DIST. TO CENTROID OF COMPRESSION
d' =
DIST. TO CENTROID OF PRESTRESSED
dp =
DISTANCE TO CENTROID OF TENSION
d=
HEIGHT OF SECTION
h=
SPAN LENGTH
L=
Vu =
FACTORED TORSIONAL MOMENT
Tu =
SECTION LOCATION ( 0 or 1 )
PRESTRESSING METHOD ( 0, 1 or 2 )
6
60
270
243
8
8
4
0.5
20
3
22.5
25.5
28
82
175
240
0
2
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
@
12
in diameter &
0.153
in
in
in
in
in
ft
k
k
at midspan
post-tensioned & bonded
in o. c.
in2 area )
TENDON FORCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER PRESTRESS TRANSFER,
Pi =
375 k
TENDON FORCE AT SERVICE LOAD AFTER ALLOWANCE LOSSES, Pe =
300 k
SHEAR DESIGN
d = MAX ( 0.8h , d p ) =
Vc =
MAX MIN
2bd
V s = MIN
22.50
0.6 f 'c + 700MIN 1 ,
( f c' )
'
f c = MIN 100 ,
in
V ud p
Mu
bd , 5bd f 'c
, 2bd f 'c
77.46
psi
, for f se 0.4 f se
174.28
'
f c , for f se < 0.4 f se
MAX
Av f yd
'
, 8bd f c
S
Av (min) =
45.00 k
d
A ps f pu S
50bS
b
,
fy
80df y
50bS
, for f
fy
S max =
provd
MIN ( 0.75d , 24) , for V s 4bd
MAX ( Av ,cal , Av (min) ) ,
se
0.4 f
se
2
0.200 in
se
'
no shear re inf . requd , for case1: V u <
V c
< 0.4 f
fc
MIN ( 0.375d , 12 ) , for V s > 4bd f 'c
Av , requd = Av (min) , for case 2 :
se
, for
16.88
V c
in
0.247828254
V u V c
for case 3 : V c V u (V S + V c )
0.248
, Case 3 applicable
unsatisfactory , for case 4 : (V S + V c ) V u

TORSION DESIGN
Acp
560
in2
Pcp
96
in
fpc
Aoh
Ph
=
=
=
0.536
404
82
ksi
in2
At =
Tu
=
S 1.7 Aoh f yv cos ( 37.5 )
Tu
f 'c
>
Acp
P cp
1+
pc
'
4 fc
215.27 k
Thus, Torsional Reinf. Reqd.
in
A L = MAX
0.006 in
f
At
Ph
S
f
yv
2
cot ( 37.5 ) ,
'
5 Acp f c
yL
yL
Ph
f yv
f
yL
max
25b
At
,
S
f yv
2
2.9315 in
Additional 4 #8 Longitudinal Reinforcement Required for Torsion
At
S
= MAX
Total Re qD
Av + 2 A t , 50b =
S
f yv
0.033
in
<
At
S
[SATISFACTORY]
=
ProvD
0.033 in
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Mechanical Equipment Anchorage to Concrete Based on IBC 2003
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
1/2
in. Per ICC ESR-1385
ANCHOR DEPTH
hef
2 1/4
EDGE DISTANCE
in
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT
CENTER OF MASS
W
H
=
=
25
8.00
kips
ft, 2/3 total height
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
ANCHOR # ALONG L DIR
ANCHOR SPACING
L
=
NL
=
SL = L / (NL - 1) =
37.5
13
38
ft
per line
in
ANCHORAGE WIDTH
ANCHOR # ALONG B DIR
ANCHOR SPACING
B
=
NB
=
SB = B / (NB - 1) =
20
7
40
ft
per line
in
KWIK BOLT - 3 DIAMETER
[THE ANCHORAGE, KWIK BOLT - 3, DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
ALLOWABLE TENSION & SHEAR VALUES (ICC ESR-1385, Table 3 or 5)
Pt
1284
lbs
Vt
1745
lbs
SPACING & EDGE REQUIREMENTS (ICC ESR-1385, Table 2)

Scr
5 1/8
in
Smin
2 1/4
in
Ccr
6 3/4
in, shear,
in, tension
Cmin
3 3/8
in, shear,
2 1/4
in, tension
DESIGN LOADS
FH = Fp = (KH) MAX{ 0.3SDSIpW , MIN[ 0.4apSDSIp(1+2z/h)/Rp W , 1.6SDSIpW ] } , (ASCE 7-02, 9.6.1.3)
= 1.3 MAX{ 0.24W , MIN[ 0.65W , 1.30W ]}
=
0.84 W , (SD)
0.60 W , (ASD)
FV = KV Fp =
0.20 W , (ASD)
15.04
5.01
where
kips
kips, up & down
SDS =
0.54
(IBC 1615.1.3, page 322)
Ip =
1.5
(IBC Tab 1604.5 & 1621.1.3)
ap =
(ASCE 7-02 Tab 9.6.2.2)
Rp =
1.5
(ASCE 7-02 Tab 9.6.2.2)
z=
h=
36
1.3
0.333
KH =
KV =
MAXIMUM OVERTURNING MOMENT AT ANCHOR EDGE
MOT = Fp H =
120.34
ft-kips
174.91
ft-kips
MRES = (0.9W - Fv ) (0.5B) =
>
MOT
ft
ft
(IBC 1621.1, page 342)
(vert. seismic factor)
no tension anchors.
CHECK TENSION CAPACITY

Ps = [(FV -0.9 W) / A + MOT y / I ] =
where
A = 2(NL + NB) -4 =
-59
36
I = MIN(Xi2 , Yi2 ) =
y = 0.5 B =
KDSA =
0.8
Kseismic =
<
lbs / bolt
(total bolts)
2
406400 in -bolts
Pt KDSA Kseismic Kedge-space
[SATISFACTORY]
(B direction governs)
120
in
(Factor adapted ICBO / ICC value)
4/3
(IBC 1605.3.2, page 274)
Kedge-space = [0.8 + 0.2(c - Cmin)(Ccr - Cmin)] [0.6 + 0.4(S - Smin)(Scr - Smin)] =
1.00
(ICC ESR-1385, Tab.2 footnotes)

Vs = FH / A =
where
418
<
lbs / bolt
Vt KDSA Kseismic Kedge-space
CHECK COMBINED LOADING CAPACITY (ICC ESR-1385 Sec. 4.1)

(Ps / Pt)5/3 + (Vs / Vt)5/3 =
0.083
<
1.00
[SATISFACTORY]
[SATISFACTORY]
1.00
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Mechanical Equipment Anchorage to Concrete Based on CBC 2001
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
1/2
ANCHOR DEPTH
hef
2 2/3
EDGE DISTANCE
48
in
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT
CENTER OF MASS
W
H
=
=
6.8
4.00
kips
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
ANCHOR SPACING
L
=
NL
=
SL = L / (NL - 1) =
18.25
10
24
ft
per line
in
ANCHORAGE WIDTH
ANCHOR SPACING
B
=
=
NB
SB = B / (NB - 1) =
10
6
24
ft
per line
in
KWIK BOLT-II DIAMETER
[THE ANCHORAGE, KWIK BOLT-II, DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]

1/2
ANALYSIS
ALLOWABLE TENSION & SHEAR VALUES (ICC ESR-1355, Table 3 or 4)
Pt
960
lbs
Vt
1840
lbs
SPACING & EDGE REQUIREMENTS (ICC ESR-1355, Table 2)

Scr
4 1/2
in
Smin
2 1/2
in
Ccr
6 3/4
in, shear,
3 3/8
in, tension
Cmin
3 3/8
in, shear,
2 1/4
in, tension
DESIGN LOADS
FH = Fp = MAX{ 0.7CaIpW , MIN[ apCaIp(1+3hx/hr)/Rp W , 4CaIpW ] }
= MAX{ 0.43W , MIN[ 4.05W , 2.43W ]}
=
2.43 W , (SD)
1.73 W , (ASD)
FV = Fp / 3 =
3.93
11.80
, (CBC 1632.2)
where
kips
kips, up & down, CBC Tab. 16A-O footnote 20

47.19
ft-kips
MOT = Fp H =
MRES = (0.9W - Fv ) (0.5B) =
10.94
ft-kips
<
MOT
Ca =
0.528
Ip =
1.15
ap =
2.5
Rp =
1.5
(CBC Tab 16A-O & 1632A.2)
hx =
hr
ft
hr =
36
ft
(CBC Tab 16A-O)
,therefore design tension anchors.

Ps = [(FV -0.9 W) / A + MOT y / I ] =
where
A = 2(NL + NB) -4 =
359
28
I = MIN(Xi2 , Yi2 ) =
y = 0.5 B =
KDSA =
0.8
Kseismic =
<
lbs / bolt
(total bolts)
in2-bolts
77760
[SATISFACTORY]
60
in
(DSA adapted ICBO / ICC value)
4/3
(CBC 1612.3.2)
1.00

Vs = FH / A =
where
421
<
lbs / bolt
CHECK COMBINED LOADING CAPACITY (ICC ESR-1355 Sec. 4.1)

(Ps / Pt)5/3 + (Vs / Vt)5/3 =
0.251
<
1.00
[SATISFACTORY]
[SATISFACTORY]
1.00
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Mechanical Equipment Anchorage to Concrete Based on CBC 2001
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
1/2
in. Per ICBO ER-1372
ANCHOR DEPTH
hef
4 1/8
in. Per ICBO ER-1372
EDGE DISTANCE
48
in
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT
CENTER OF MASS
W
H
=
=
13.35
4.33
kips
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
ANCHOR SPACING
L
=
=
NL
SL = L / (NL - 1) =
30.5
6
73
ft
per line
in
ANCHORAGE WIDTH
ANCHOR SPACING
B
=
NB
=
SB = B / (NB - 1) =
7.29
2
87
ft
per line
in
RED HEAD DIAMETER
4.00
[THE ANCHORAGE DESIGN IS NOT ADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
ALLOWABLE TENSION & SHEAR VALUES (ICBO ER-1372, Table 3)
Pt
1787.5
lbs
Vt
1810
lbs
SPACING & EDGE REQUIREMENTS (ICBO ER-1372, Table 4 & 5)

Sfull
6 3/16 in, spacing required to max value.
Smin
3 1/8
Efull
5 3/16 in, shear,
3 1/8
Emin
1 9/16 in, shear,
1 9/16 in, tension
in
in, tension
(edge to max value.)
DESIGN LOADS
= MAX{ 0.35W , MIN[ 3.37W , 2.02W ]}
=
2.02 W , (SD)
1.45 W , (ASD)
FV = Fp / 3 =
6.43
19.30
, (CBC 1632.2)
where
kips

MOT = Fp H =
83.63
ft-kips
20.34
ft-kips
MRES = (0.9W - Fv ) (0.5B) =
<
MOT
Ca =
0.44
Ip =
1.15
ap =
2.5
(CBC Tab 16A-O)
Rp =
1.5
(CBC Tab 16A-O & 1632A.2)
hx =
hr
ft
hr =
16
ft

Ps = [(FV -0.9 W) / A + MOT y / I ] =
where
A = 2(NL + NB) -4 =
1447
12
I = MIN(Xi2 , Yi2 ) =
y = 0.5 B =
KDSA =
0.8
Kseismic =
<
lbs / bolt
(total bolts)
in2-bolts
22958
[SATISFACTORY]
43.74 in
(DSA adapted ICBO / ICC value)
4/3
(CBC 1612.3.2)
Kedge-space = [0.65 + 0.35(c - Emin)(Efull - Emin)] [0.7 + 0.3(S - Smin)(Sfull - Smin)] =
1.00
(ICBO ER-1372, Tab.4 & 5)

Vs = FH / A =
where
1608
<
lbs / bolt
Kedge-space = [0.2 + 0.8(c - Emin)(Efull - Emin)] [0.4 + 0.6(S - Smin)(Sfull - Smin)] =
[SATISFACTORY]
1.00
(ICBO ER-1372, Tab.4 & 5, assuming, in Fig 2, a line between E2 & E conservatively.)
CHECK COMBINED LOADING CAPACITY (ICBO ER-1372 Sec. 2.4)
(Ps / Pt)5/3 + (Vs / Vt)5/3 =
1.369
>
1.00
[UNSATISFACTORY]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Mechanical Equipment Anchorage to Wood Roof Based on NDS 1997
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

LAG SCREW DIAMETER
LAG SCREW LENGTH
Long
=
=
1/2
4
in, NDS APP. L

in, NDS APP. L
W
H
=
=
1.4
8.25
kips
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT
CM HEIGHT
ANCHORAGE LENGTH
LAG SCREW # ALONG L DIR
LAG SCREW SPACING
L
=
NL
=
SL = L / (NL - 1) =
8
3
48
ft
per line
in
ANCHORAGE WIDTH
LAG SCREW # ALONG B DIR
LAG SCREW SPACING
B
=
NB
=
SB = B / (NB - 1) =
8
2
96
ft
per line
in
[THE ANCHORAGE, USING 1/2" x 4" LAG SCREWS, IS ADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
ALLOWABLE TENSION & SHEAR VALUES
ZII' = CD Cd Cg ZII =
where
CD =
219
lbs
1.33
(1.6 for NDS, 1.33 for CBC)
Cd = p / (8D) =
1.5
0.814
p = S + (T-E) - (Diaphragn Thk) - ts =

S + (T-E) =
3.688
0.298
Diaphragm Thk =
ts =
0.134
3.256 in
in (NDS Appendix L, page 169)

in (0.298 for 15/32, 0.319 for 19/32, UBC Table 23-2-H, page 3-420)
in (10 gage, NDS Tab 9.3B, page 82)
Cg =
0.92
(NDS Tab 7.3.6C, page 48)
ZII =
220
lbs (NDS Tab 9.3B, page 82)
Z ' = CD Cd Cg Z =
Z =
159
lbs
160
lbs (NDS Tab 9.3B, page 82)
(W ' p) = CD W (T-E) =
where W =
378
(T-E) =
2.188
1100 lbs
lbs / in (NDS Tab 9.2A, page 78)
in (NDS Appendix L, page 169)
DESIGN LOADS
= MAX{ 0.43W , MIN[ 0.81W , 2.43W ]}
=
0.81 W , (SD)
0.58 W , (ASD)
FV = Fp / 3 =
0.27
, (CBC 1632.2)
where
0.81
kips

6.68
ft-kips
MOT = Fp H =
ft-kips
MRES,L = (0.9W - Fv ) (0.5B) = 3.96
ft-kips
MRES,B = (0.9W - Fv ) (0.5B) = 3.96
<
<
MOT
MOT
Ca =
0.528
Ip =
1.15
ap =
(CBC Tab 16A-O)
Rp =
(CBC Tab 16A-O)
hx =
hr
ft
hr =
36
ft

TENSION LOAD AT CORNER LAG SCREW

TL = (FV -0.9 W) / A + MOT y / I =
where
252
A = 2(NL + NB) -4 =
I = Xi2 =
9216
y = 0.5 L =
48
SHEAR LOAD AT EACH LAG SCREW

V = FH / A =
135
TB = (FV -0.9 W) / A + MOT y / I =
lbs / bolt
(total bolts)
where
in2-bolts
I = Yi2 =
13824
y = 0.5 B =
48
113
in2-bolts
in
in
lbs / bolt
CHECK CORNER SCREW CAPACITY AT COMBINED LATERAL AND WITHDRAWAL LOADS

2
2
Z ' = ZII'(W' p) / (ZII'sin + W'p cos )
581
lbs / bolt
>
-1
where
= tan (TL / V) =
61.87
Z ' = Z '(W' p) / (Z 'sin2 + W'p cos2)
=
where
246
lbs / bolt
-1
= tan (TB / V) =
>
40.01
(NDS 9.3-6)
2
2 0.5
[TL + V ]
286
lbs / bolt
[SATISFACTORY]
176
lbs / bolt
[SATISFACTORY]
(NDS 9.3-6)
o
[TB2 + V2 ]0.5 =
lbs / bolt
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Flexible Diaphragm with an Opening

INPUT DATA
Fp =
LATERAL DIAPHRAGM FORCE :

DIMENSIONS:
380
plf
X1 =
72
ft , X2 =
24
ft , X3 =
16
ft
Y1 =
20
ft , Y2 =
20
ft , Y3 =
20
ft
DESIGN SUMMARY
THE MAXIMUM STRAP FORCE, T = C =
4.66
THE MAXIMUM SHEAR STRESS,
vx=
kips
466
plf
vy=
480
plf
ANALYSIS
16
(cont'd)
21.280
kips
a = X1 + 0.5 X2 =
84.00
ft
b = 0.5 Y2 + Y3 =
30.00
ft
Y = Y1 + Y2 + Y3 =
60.00
ft
w = Fp b / Y =
190.0
plf
M = a VL - 0.5 Fpx a2 =
446.9
ft-k, total moment at middle opening
F2 = M / Y =
7448
lbf
VL =
REACTIONS :
HATCHED AREA :
F5 = ( F2 b - 0.5 w a2 ) / a =
-5320
VR =
,
kips
F9 = F2 =
21.280
kips
V = b VL / Y =
7448
F15 = w a - V + F5 =
10.640
lbf
0
kips
X (ft)
Y (ft)
vx (plf)
vy (plf)
NO.
FORCE (lbf)
NO.
FORCE (lbf)
72.00
20.00
138
480
F1
9956
F15
12.00
20.00
209
266
F2
7448
F16
12.00
20.00
323
380
F3
3572
F17
-2512
16.00
20.00
223
299
F4
3040
F18
-1034
72.00
10.00
103
103
F5
-5320
F19
-4655
16.00
10.00
466
466
F6
7600
F20
1108
72.00
10.00
103
103
F7
2508
F21
-2508
INDIVIDUAL PANEL
16.00
10.00
466
466
F8
-3876
F22
3876
72.00
20.00
138
480
F9
7448
F23
3040
10
12.00
20.00
209
266
F10
7448
F24
5320
11
12.00
20.00
323
380
F11
2512
F25
7600
12
16.00
20.00
223
299
F12
1034
F26
9956
F13
4655
F27
3572
F14
-1108
1. Kelly E. Cobeen: "Structuiral Engineering Review Workshop", BYA publications, 2005.
kips
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Design of Post-Tensioned Concrete Floor Based on ACI 318-02

1. DESIGN METHODS
1.1 BREAKDOWN OF FLOOR INTO DESIGN STRIPS IN TWO DIRECTIONS. USE THIS SOFEWARE TO GET REQUIRED EFFECTIVE
POST-TENSIONING FORCEES IN EACH DIRECTIONS.
1.2 BANDED ALL TENDONS AT COLUMN IN ONE DIRECTION, AND DISTRIBTUTED IN THE OTHER DIRECTION. ON THE DESIGN
DRAWINGS, SPECIFY TOTAL REQUIRED EFFECTIVE POST-TENSIONING FORCEES AT BANDED TENDONS, AND UNIFORM
FORCES IN DISTRIBTUTED TENDONS.
1.3 WHEN TENDON LESS THAN 140 FT, STRESS AT ONE END. OTHERWISE STRESS AT BOTH ENDS.
1.4 THE VARIOUS LIVE LOADING CONDITIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDED BY INPUT LL ZERO AT SOME SPANS.

CONCRETE STRENGTH
f'c
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
TENDON PROPERTIES
fpu
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
#
#
fpy
fse
dia
Aps
SLAB THICKNESS
TRIBUTARY WIDTH, PERPENDICULAR
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
COLUMN DEEPTH
c2
TOP BAR SIZE AT COLUMN

BOTTOM CONTIUOUS BAR SIZE
Location
Mid of L1
Left
ksi
60
ksi
270
ksi
243
ksi
175
ksi
1/2
0.153
in
in2
in
30
ft
22
in
22
in
5
4
Mid of L2
Support
4.5
Support
Mid of LTyp
Support
Mid of Ln-1
Support
Mid Ln
Span (ft)
20
30
30
30
20
DL (psf)
120
120
120
120
120
LL (psf)
75
75
75
75
75
75%
75%
80%
75%
75%
Balanced DL (60%-80% suggested)

dCGS (in, from bottom)
3.33
REQD EFFECTIVE PT (k / ft)

Total if banded (kips)
Tendons
2.5
2.5
7.5
2.5
25.92
7.5
3.33
24.30
22.31
669.4
729.0
777.6
729.0
669.4
1 / 2 in Dia @ 13 in o.c.
1 / 2 in Dia @ 12 in o.c.
1 / 2 in Dia @ 13 in o.c.
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.
26
28
30
28
26
7 # 5 , L = 3.03 ft
Bot Bars, Cont., E. Way
10 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
Not ReqD
Required column cap thk, (in)
7.5
24.30
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.
Total Number if banded

Top Bars at Column
7.5
22.31
Right
Not ReqD
22 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
22 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
# 4 @ 45in. o.c.
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
10 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
# 4 @ 45in. o.c.
Not ReqD
7 # 5 , L = 3.03 ft
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
3. DESIGN LOADS & SECTION FORCES

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of LTyp
Support
Mid of Ln-1
Support
Mid Ln
MDL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
2.14
-7.72
5.01
-9.26
4.24
-9.26
5.01
-7.72
2.14
0.00
MLL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
1.34
-4.83
3.13
-5.78
2.65
-5.78
3.13
-4.83
1.34
0.00
0.00
-1.65
5.71
-3.66
7.23
-3.57
7.23
-3.66
5.71
-1.65
Balanced Load (psf, uplift)
-90
Balanced MBal (ft-k / ft)

Required Effective PT (k / ft)
Tendon Spacing (in)
Primary MFe (ft-k / ft)
0.00
-90
0.00
-90
-90
22.31
24.30
25.92
24.30
14
13
12
13
-1.25
6.51
7.09
Secondary MSec (ft-k / ft)
-96
0.40
7.56
-3.04
7.09
1.38
0.62
-0.14
0.80
-3.24
0.33
0.33
0.00
22.31
14
7.56
7.09
Right
6.51
-3.04
7.09
-0.14
0.62
1.38
0.33
0.80
-1.25
0.00
0.40
0.00
Right
4. CHECK SERVICE LOAD STRESSES

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of LTyp
Support
Mid of Ln-1
Support
Mid Ln
A (in2 / ft)
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
S (in3 / ft)
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
F / A (ksi)
0.232
0.232
0.270
0.270
0.232
0.232
0.232
0.253
0.253
0.253
0.253
0.279
0.232
0.186
0.232
0.503
0.45 fc' =
2.025
-0.409
0.404
0.232
0.061
0.232
0.6 fc' =
2.700
0.232
0.253
Check 125 psi < F /A < 275 psi

M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.232
for load combination (DL + PT)

0.232
0.186

Check ft < 7.5 (fc')
M / S + F / A , (ksi)
and fc < 0.45 fc'

0.232
0.404
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.232
0.061
and fc < 0.6 fc'
-0.462
-0.479
-0.167
0.985
0.874
[Satisfactory]
0.207
0.443
0.674
1.002
0.080
0.063
0.582
where
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2b),
0.064
0.421
0.126
7.5 (fc')
0.5
0.442
=
-0.462
-0.479
-0.042
0.043
0.380
0.460
0.443
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2a),
-0.409
0.895
0.5
0.333
0.063
0.460
0.126
[Satisfactory]
-0.388
for load (DL + LL + PT)
0.080
0.380
0.421
0.442
0.5
0.043
0.064
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
(ADAPT suggestion)
[Satisfactory]
0.279
0.270
0.253
0.674
-0.388
-0.167
0.895
1.002
0.985
where
0.874
7.5 (fc')
0.5
0.503
(cont'd)
5. CALCULATE NON-PRESTRESSED REINFORCEMENT

Location
Left
Max. Nc (k / ft), (ACI 318, 18.0)
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
0.000
As (in2 / ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)

Bottom Bars, Each Way
Support
1.599
Mid of LTyp
Support
Mid of Ln-1
0.134
Support
1.599
Mid Ln
Right
0.000
0.000
0.053
0.000
0.053
0.000
Not ReqD
# 4 @ 45in. o.c.
Not ReqD
# 4 @ 45in. o.c.
Not ReqD
Max. Acf (in2), (ACI 318, 18.0)
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
As' (in2), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)
2.160
2.160
2.160
2.160
2.160
2.160
7#5
7#5
7#5
7#5
7#5
7#5
3.03
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.39
3.03
Top Bars at Column

L (ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.4.1)
6. CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY BY STRENGTH DESIGN METHOD

Location
Factored Mu (ft-k / ft)
Left
Mid of L1
Support
0.00
5.11
-16.19
1.2 MDL + 1.6 MLL + 1.0 MSec

dp (in)
Mid of L2
-15.61
11.64
5.50
Support
Mid of LTyp
Support
-20.03
9.67
-20.03
-20.50
Mid of Ln-1
-20.50
11.64
5.50
4.00
4.67
7.50
0.00273
0.00234
0.00146
0.00157
0.00214
0.00157
0.00157
0.00214
L / dp
60.00
51.39
40.00
65.45
48.00
65.45
48.00
65.45
fps (ksi)
185.64
186.56
190.44
188.24
185.88
188.24
0.131
0.131
(ACI 318, 18.7.2, b & c)

Aps (in2 / ft)
191.62
Actual Area
d (in)
6.63
6.75
a (in)
0.21
0.40
203.09
Actual As (in2 / ft)

Required As' (in2)
Top Bars at Column
Actual As' (in )
2
Mn (ft-k / ft)
0.14
6.63
191.62
0.153
0.14
6.75
6.63
6.75
0.85
0.55
0.88
Right
5.11
0.00
-15.61
7.50
4.67
4.00
0.00146
0.00234
0.00273
0.00157
40.00
51.39
60.00
190.44
186.56
185.64
0.131
0.131
191.62
0.131
0.141
0.65
0.67
203.09
0.153
Mid Ln
-16.19
0.14
6.63
6.75
6.63
6.75
6.63
0.67
0.40
0.21
0.65
0.64
0.85
0.88
0.14
0.000
0.018
0.000
0.018
0.000
Not ReqD
# 4 @ 136in. o.c.
Not ReqD
# 4 @ 136in. o.c.
Not ReqD
0.000
0.053
0.000
0.053
0.000
0.000
2.933
6.655
6.655
2.933
0.000
Not ReqD
10 # 5
22 # 5
22 # 5
10 # 5
Not ReqD
2.170
-9.23
8.21
Actual Capacity
3.100
6.820
-16.34
-21.62
-17.51
Check Mn > Mu
pt, (ACI 318, 18.8.1)
7.50
0.00170
0.153
0.64
Required As (in2 / ft)
5.50
0.00232
191.62
0.131
0.141
7.50
0.00170
Support
12.68
11.14
-20.66
6.820
3.100
-21.62
-16.34
-20.66
12.68
2.170
8.21
-9.23
0.0262
0.0433
-17.51
[Satisfactory]
0.0433
0.0262
c(dp - a / 1) / (a / 1)
0.0246
0.0188
0.0261
Check pt > 0.005
0.0180
0.0216
0.0181
0.0188
0.0246
0.0181
0.0180
0.0261
Support
Mid of Ln-1
Support
(ACI 318, 18.8.1)
[Satisfactory]
7. CHECK PUNCHING SHEAR CAPACITY BY STRENGTH DESIGN METHOD

Location
RDL (k)
Left
35.99
Mid of L1
Support
90.01
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of LTyp
108.00
108.00
90.01
Mid Ln
Right
35.99
RLL (k)
22.49
56.26
67.50
67.50
56.26
22.49
RSec (k)
-26.99
-67.51
-83.70
-83.70
-67.51
-26.99
52.18
130.52
153.90
153.90
130.52
52.18
228.48
Vu =1.2 RDL + 1.6 RLL + 1.0 Rsec

Required b0d, (ACI 318, 11-36)
228.48
565.70
655.06
655.06
565.70
Required d, (ACI 318, 11.0)
3.16
5.20
5.88
5.88
5.20
3.16
For Vn > Vu, the required
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
column cap thickness, tcap (in)
Note:
1. The column moments are negligible for gravity punching design. Lateral loads, seismic and wind, should be supported by shear walls. Using equivalent frames to support lateral loads is not suggested.
2. By inspection, the deflections of slab do not govern PT concrete floor design. Otherwise, using PT concrete floor is inadequate for larger live load. (ACI 318, 9.5.4.1)
1. "Design of Post-Tensioned Slabs Using Unbonded Tendons, Third Edition", The Post-Tensioning Institute, 2004.
2. "Design, Construction and Maintenance of Cast-in-Place Post-Tensioned Concrete Parking Structures, First Edition", The Post-Tensioning Institute, 2001.
3. Bijan O. Aalami & Allan Bommer, "Design Fundamentals of Post-Tensioned Concrete Floors, First Edition", The Post-Tensioning Institute, 1999.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

1. DESIGN METHODS

CONCRETE STRENGTH
f'c
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
TENDON PROPERTIES
fpu
fpy
fse
dia
Aps
SLAB THICKNESS
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
COLUMN DEEPTH
c2

Location
Mid of L1
Left
Support
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
#
#
Mid of L2
ksi
60
ksi
270
ksi
243
ksi
175
ksi
1/2
0.153
in
in2
in
30
ft
22
in
22
in
5
4
Support
Mid of L3
Support
Mid L4
Span (ft)
20
30
30
20
DL (psf)
120
120
120
120
LL (psf)
75
75
75
75
75%
80%
80%
75%

3.33

Tendons
2.5
2.5
7.5
3.33
25.92
22.31
669.4
777.6
777.6
669.4
1 / 2 in Dia @ 12 in o.c.
1 / 2 in Dia @ 12 in o.c.
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.
26
30
30
26
7 # 5 , L = 3.03 ft

7.5
25.92
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.

Top Bars at Column
7.5
22.31
Right
9 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
22 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
9 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
# 4 @ 378in. o.c.
Not ReqD
7 # 5 , L = 3.03 ft
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of L3
Support
Mid L4
MDL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
2.21
-7.59
4.85
-9.71
4.85
-7.59
2.21
0.00
MLL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
1.38
-4.74
3.03
-6.07
3.03
-4.74
1.38
0.00
0.00
-1.54
5.93
-3.92
7.84
-3.92
5.93
-1.54

-90

Tendon Spacing (in)
-96
-96
22.31
25.92
25.92
14
12
12
0.00
-1.25
6.51
0.00
0.29
0.58
7.56
7.56
-3.24
1.63
0.68
-0.28
-90
0.00
22.31
14
-3.24
7.56
0.68
1.63
7.56
-0.28
Right
6.51
-1.25
0.00
0.58
0.29
0.00
Right

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of L3
Support
Mid L4
A (in2 / ft)
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
S (in3 / ft)
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
F / A (ksi)
0.232
0.232
0.232
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.232
0.232
0.295
0.232
0.388
0.170
0.232
where
0.45 fc' =
0.530
0.425
0.232
0.833
0.040
0.232
where
7.5 (fc')0.5 =
0.530
0.270
M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.232
0.295
0.232
0.170
0.232
0.425
0.232

Check ft < 7.5 (fc')0.5 and fc < 0.6 fc'
0.182
0.040
0.870
0.182
-0.102
0.642
-0.474
1.014
0.114
0.077
0.445
-0.474
0.642
0.833
[Satisfactory]
0.358
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2a),
-0.368
-0.330
0.232
0.095
0.445
[Satisfactory]
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.095
0.358
0.388
0.426

M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.077
0.114
0.270
(ADAPT suggestion)
[Satisfactory]
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.270
0.426
1.014
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2b),
2.250
0.6 fc' =
3.000
-0.330
-0.368
-0.102
0.45 fc' =
0.870
(cont'd)

Location
Left
Max. Nc (k / ft), (ACI 318, 18.0)
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
0.000
As (in2 / ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)

Support
Mid of L3
0.672
Support
Mid L4
0.672
Right
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Max. Acf (in2), (ACI 318, 18.0)
2880
2880
2880
2880
2880
As' (in2), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)
2.160
2.160
2.160
2.160
2.160
7#5
7#5
7#5
7#5
7#5
3.03
9.39
9.39
9.39
3.03
Top Bars at Column

L (ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.4.1)

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
0.00
5.14
-16.12
1.2 MDL + 1.6 MLL + 1.0 MSec

dp (in)
Mid of L2
-15.06
11.35
5.50
Support
Mid of L3
Support
Mid L4
Right
-21.63
11.35
-15.06
5.14
0.00
4.67
4.00
-21.63
-16.12
4.00
4.67
7.50
0.00273
0.00234
0.00146
0.00170
0.00232
0.00170
0.00146
0.00234
0.00273
L / dp
60.00
51.39
40.00
65.45
48.00
65.45
40.00
51.39
60.00
fps (ksi)
186.25
187.27
191.59
189.22
186.60
189.22
187.27
186.25
0.131
0.131
0.131
(ACI 318, 18.7.2, b & c)

Aps (in2 / ft)
189.22
200.98
0.131
Actual Area
d (in)
0.153
0.15
6.63
6.75
6.63
6.75
0.19
0.36
0.60
0.54

Required As' (in2)
Top Bars at Column
Actual As' (in )
2
Mn (ft-k / ft)
7.50
0.00170
189.22
191.59
0.58
0.153
0.15
0.153
0.131
0.131
6.63
6.75
6.63
6.75
6.63
0.83
0.57
0.54
0.36
0.19
0.83
0.60
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.000
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
# 4 @ 378in. o.c.
Not ReqD
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.000
0.000
2.683
6.705
2.683
0.000
Not ReqD
9#5
22 # 5
9#5
Not ReqD
2.790
2.170
2.170
-9.28
8.27
Actual Capacity
2.790
6.820
-16.22
-21.74
-18.36
Check Mn > Mu
pt, (ACI 318, 18.8.1)
5.50
0.00232
0.153
a (in)
7.50
0.00170
12.02
11.35
-21.74
-18.36
-16.22
8.27
-9.28
0.0271
0.0284
0.0469
Support
Mid L4
[Satisfactory]
0.0469
0.0284
c(dp - a / 1) / (a / 1)
0.0271
0.0187
0.0302
Check pt > 0.005
0.0199
0.0203
0.0187
0.0302
(ACI 318, 18.8.1)
[Satisfactory]

Location
RDL (k)
Left
35.99
Mid of L1
Support
90.01
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of L3
108.00
90.01
Right
35.99
RLL (k)
22.49
56.26
67.50
56.26
22.49
RSec (k)
-26.99
-70.21
-86.40
-70.21
-26.99
52.18
127.81
151.21
127.81
52.18
219.34
Vu =1.2 RDL + 1.6 RLL + 1.0 Rsec

219.34
527.85
613.74
527.85
3.04
4.90
5.57
4.90
3.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Note:
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

1. DESIGN METHODS

CONCRETE STRENGTH
f'c
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
TENDON PROPERTIES
fpu
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
#
#
fpy
fse
dia
Aps
SLAB THICKNESS
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
COLUMN DEEPTH
c2

Location
Mid of L1
Left
ksi
ksi
270
ksi
243
ksi
175
ksi
1/2
0.153
in
in2
in
30
ft
22
in
22
in
5
4
Mid of L2
Support
5
60
Support
Mid of L3
Span (ft)
20
30
20
DL (psf)
120
120
120
LL (psf)
75
75
75
75%
80%
75%

3.33

Tendons
2.5
3.33
22.31
669.4
777.6
669.4
1 / 2 in Dia @ 12 in o.c.
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.
26
30
26
7 # 5 , L = 3.03 ft
15 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
Not ReqD
7.5
25.92
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.

Top Bars at Column
7.5
22.31
Right
Not ReqD
15 # 5 , L = 9.39 ft
# 4 @ 58in. o.c.
Not ReqD
7 # 5 , L = 3.03 ft
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of L3
MDL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
1.96
-8.08
5.42
-8.08
1.96
0.00
MLL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
1.23
-5.05
3.39
-5.05
1.23
0.00
0.00
-1.32
6.37
-4.43
6.37
-1.32
-90

Tendon Spacing (in)
0.00
-96
22.31
25.92
14
12
-1.25
6.51
7.56
0.00
0.07
-90
0.14
0.00
22.31
14
6.51
-3.24
Right
-1.25
0.00
0.07
0.00
Right
7.56
0.14
1.19
1.19
1.19

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of L3
A (in2 / ft)
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
S (in3 / ft)
128
128
128
128
128
128
128
F / A (ksi)
0.232
0.232
0.232
0.232
0.232
0.232
0.293
0.232
0.172
0.232
0.270
M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.232
0.232
0.172

M / S + F / A , (ksi)
and fc < 0.45 fc'

0.232
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.232
0.408
and fc < 0.6 fc'
0.177
0.430
0.393
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2a),
-0.401
0.057
-0.401
0.681
-0.363
-0.141
0.903
0.866
0.903
0.5
0.110
[Satisfactory]
-0.363
0.072
0.363
0.393
0.430
0.5
0.072
0.110
[Satisfactory]
0.270
(ADAPT suggestion)
[Satisfactory]
0.293
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.270
0.866
where
0.408
0.232
0.057
0.232
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2b),
where
0.45 fc' =
0.530
0.45 fc' =
2.250
7.5 (fc')0.5 =
0.530
0.6 fc' =
3.000
(cont'd)

Location
Left
Max. Nc (k / ft), (ACI 318, 18.0)
Mid of L1
Support
Mid of L2
0.000
As (in2 / ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)

Support
1.158
Mid of L3
Right
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Max. Acf (in2), (ACI 318, 18.0)
2880
2880
2880
2880
As' (in2), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)
2.160
2.160
2.160
2.160
7#5
7#5
7#5
7#5
3.03
9.39
9.39
3.03
Top Bars at Column

L (ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.4.1)

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
0.00
4.39
-17.63
1.2 MDL + 1.6 MLL + 1.0 MSec

dp (in)
Mid of L2
-16.58
13.12
5.50
4.00
4.67
7.50
0.00273
0.00234
0.00146
0.00170
0.00232
L / dp
60.00
51.39
40.00
65.45
fps (ksi)
186.25
187.27
191.59
0.131
0.131
(ACI 318, 18.7.2, b & c)

Aps (in2 / ft)
189.22
6.63
6.75
6.63
a (in)
0.19
0.33
0.66

Required As' (in2)
Top Bars at Column
Actual As' (in )
2
Mn (ft-k / ft)
7.50
4.67
4.00
0.00146
0.00234
0.00273
40.00
51.39
60.00
191.59
187.27
186.25
0.131
0.131
0.131
0.15
6.75
0.65
6.63
6.75
6.63
0.66
0.33
0.19
0.61
0.000
0.041
0.000
Not ReqD
# 4 @ 58in. o.c.
Not ReqD
0.000
0.041
0.000
0.000
4.367
4.367
0.000
Not ReqD
15 # 5
15 # 5
Not ReqD
2.170
-9.28
8.30
Actual Capacity
4.650
4.650
-17.90
-17.90
-20.03
Check Mn > Mu
pt, (ACI 318, 18.8.1)
0.00
189.22
0.15
0.61
Right
4.39
0.00170
200.98
0.153
Mid of L3
-17.63
-16.58
0.131
Actual Area
d (in)
Support
13.13
2.170
8.30
-9.28
0.0314
0.0469
-20.03
[Satisfactory]
0.0469
0.0314
c(dp - a / 1) / (a / 1)
0.0241
0.0241
0.0267
Check pt > 0.005
0.0173
0.0267
(ACI 318, 18.8.1)
[Satisfactory]

Location
RDL (k)
Left
35.99
Mid of L1
Support
90.01
Mid of L2
Support
Mid of L3
90.01
Right
35.99
RLL (k)
22.49
56.26
56.26
22.49
RSec (k)
-26.99
-70.21
-70.21
-26.99
52.18
127.82
127.82
52.18
Vu =1.2 RDL + 1.6 RLL + 1.0 Rsec

219.34
527.86
527.86
219.34
3.04
4.90
4.90
3.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Note:
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

1. DESIGN METHODS

CONCRETE STRENGTH
f'c
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
TENDON PROPERTIES
fpu
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
#
#
fpy
fse
dia
Aps
SLAB THICKNESS
COLUMN WIDTH
c1
COLUMN DEEPTH
c2

Location
Mid of L1
Left
Support
Mid L2
20
DL (psf)
120
120
LL (psf)
75
75
75%
75%
3.33

Tendons
3.33
669.4
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.
26
7 # 5 , L = 6.06 ft
# 4 @ 73in. o.c.
Not ReqD
ksi
1/2
0.153
in
in2
in
30
ft
22
in
22
in
26
ksi
175
22.31
669.4
7 # 5 , L = 3.03 ft
ksi
243
Right
1 / 2 in Dia @ 14 in o.c.

Top Bars at Column
7.5
22.31
ksi
270
20
ksi
Span (ft)
5
60
7 # 5 , L = 3.33 ft
# 4 @ 73in. o.c.
Not ReqD
Not ReqD

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid L2
MDL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
3.50
-5.00
3.50
0.00
MLL (ft-k / ft)
0.00
2.19
-3.13
2.19
0.00
0.00
-2.63
3.75
-2.63

-90
-90
22.31
Tendon Spacing (in)
Right
0.00
22.31
14
14
0.00
-1.25
6.51
0.00
1.38
2.76
6.51
-1.25
0.00
2.76
1.38
0.00
Right

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid L2
A (in2 / ft)
96
96
96
96
96
S (in3 / ft)
128
128
128
128
128
F / A (ksi)
0.232
0.232
0.232
0.232

M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.232
[Satisfactory]
0.314
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.150
M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.232
0.520
0.232
-0.055
0.232
0.232
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2a),
where
0.45 fc' =
0.530
0.45 fc' =
2.250
where
7.5 (fc')0.5 =
0.530
0.6 fc' =
3.000
-0.178
-0.178
0.150
[Satisfactory]
- M / S + F / A , (ksi)
0.314
0.350
0.350
0.232
(ADAPT suggestion)
0.115
0.115
0.232
0.232
0.520
0.232
0.643
0.643
[Satisfactory]
-0.055
0.232
(ACI 318-02, 18.3.3 & 18.4.2b),
(cont'd)

Location
Left
Max. Nc (k / ft), (ACI 318, 18.0)
Mid of L1
Support
Mid L2
0.250
As (in2 / ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)

Right
0.250
0.000
0.000
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Max. Acf (in2), (ACI 318, 18.0)
2880
2880
2880
As' (in2), (ACI 318, 18.9.3.2)
2.160
2.160
2.160
7#5
7#5
7#5
3.03
6.06
3.33
Top Bars at Column

L (ft), (ACI 318, 18.9.4.1)

Location
Left
Mid of L1
Support
Mid L2
Right
0.00
9.08
-8.24
9.08
0.00
4.67
4.00
1.2 MDL + 1.6 MLL + 1.0 MSec

dp (in)
-8.24
4.00
4.67
7.50
0.00273
0.00234
0.00146
0.00146
0.00234
0.00273
L / dp
60.00
51.39
32.00
51.39
60.00
fps (ksi)
186.25
187.27
214.46
187.27
186.25
0.131
0.131
0.131
(ACI 318, 18.7.2, b & c)

Aps (in2 / ft)
191.59
0.131
Actual Area
d (in)
0.131
0.131
6.63
6.75
6.63
6.75
6.63
a (in)
0.19
0.52
0.26
0.52
0.19
0.27
Required As' (in2)
Top Bars at Column
Actual As' (in )
2
Mn (ft-k / ft)
0.033
0.033
# 4 @ 73in. o.c.
# 4 @ 73in. o.c.
0.033
0.000
0.000
Not ReqD
0#5
Not ReqD
2.170
2.170
2.170
-9.28
9.08
Actual Capacity
-17.66
-16.00
Check Mn > Mu
pt, (ACI 318, 18.8.1)
0.033
0.000
9.08
-9.28
[Satisfactory]
0.0469
0.0186
c(dp - a / 1) / (a / 1)
0.0669
0.0648
Check pt > 0.005
0.0186
0.0469
(ACI 318, 18.8.1)
[Satisfactory]

Location
RDL (k)
Left
35.99
Mid of L1
Support
72.02
Mid L2
Right
35.99
RLL (k)
22.50
45.01
22.50
RSec (k)
-26.99
-54.01
-26.99
52.19
104.42
52.19
219.36
Vu =1.2 RDL + 1.6 RLL + 1.0 Rsec

219.36
438.91
3.04
4.19
3.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
Note:
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
Tian Li
JOB NO. :
Masonry Shear Wall Design Based on ACI 530-02
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE CATEGORY
0
1
1.5
60
D
No, (reduced fm' by 0.5)

CMU
ksi
ksi
Seismic D
=
=
=
=
=
4.9
6
0
8
4.67
k
k
ft-k
in
ft
hw
EFFECTIVE HEIGHT of WALL
VERT. REINF. AT EACH END (As)
1
WALL HORIZ. REINF. (Ash)
1
WALL VERT. REINF. (Asv)
=
1
#
#
10.67
#
4
4
ft
( C,D,E, 0=WIND, 5=GRAVITY)
SERVICE AXIAL LOAD

SERVICE SHEAR LOAD
SERVICE MOMENT LOAD
THICKNESS OF WALL
LENGTH OF WALL
P
V
M
t
5
@
@
ANALYSIS
REINF. AREA AT EACH END
GROSS WALL AREA
EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF WALL
EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF WALL
MASONRY ELASTICITY MODULUS
STEEL ELASTICITY MODULUS
As
Ag
d
bw
Em
Es
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.31
448
48
7.63
1350
29000
THE ALLOWABLE STRESS DUE TO FLEXURE IS
F b = ( SF ) 0.33 f
'
m
)=
0.330
9.4
in
in
ksi
ksi
& seismic only
M T = M +V hw =
kips
64.02
fv=
V
b wl w
14

160
140
120
100
Pm (k)
4.9
80
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
Mm (ft-k)
) ( 24) =
THE SHEAR STRESS IN MASONRY IS
= 0.173
80
100
in
MODULAR RATIO
n =
21.48
REINFORCEMENT RATIO
=
0.0008
ALLOWABLE STRESS FACTOR
SF =
0.667
2
REQD MIN. HORIZ. REINF.
Ash,min =
0.128 in /ft
Ssh,max =
19
in
2
REQD MIN. VERT. REINF.
Asv,min =
0.128 in /ft
Ssv,max =
19
in
THE ALLOWABLE REINF. STRESS DUE TO FLEXURE IS
32.00 ksi
THE TOTAL MOMENT ACTING AT BOTTOM IS
THE NEUTRAL AXIS DEPTH FACTOR IS
k = 2n + ( n ) n
in2
in2
DIST. FR BAR'S CENT. TO END

a
=
8
in o.c.
in o.c.
F S = (1.33wind
ksi
THE TOTAL AXIAL FORCE ACTING AT BOTTOM IS
PT = P + ( wall weight ) =
=>
16
16
psi
ft-kips
THE CODE SEC. 2.3.2.2.1 PERMITS COMPRESSION FORCES TO BE RESISTED BY COMPRESSION REINFORCEMENT
ONLY IF THE LATERAL SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS OF CODE SEC. 2.1.6.5 ARE MET. SINCE IT IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE
TO MEET THESE PROVISIONS IN WALLS, THE CONTRIBUTION OF REINFORCING STEEL TO COMPRESSIVE FORCE
MUST BE NEGLECTED.
THE MAXIMUN DESIGN AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH IS P m = t Lw Fb =
147.9456 kips. THE DESIGN MOMENT CAPACITY

AT MAXIMUM AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH IS 0 ft-kips.
THE DESIGN AXIAL AND MOMENT CAPACITIES AT THE WALL CRACKED BUT STEEL STRESS ZERO ARE 85 kips
AND 85 ft-kips.
FOR THE BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION UNDER COMBINED FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOAD, THE MAXIMUM STRAIN IN
THE MASONRY AND IN THE TENSION REINFORCEMENT MUST SIMULTANEOUSLY REACH THE VALUES AS
m = Fb / Em and
s = Fs / Es . THE DESIGN AXIAL AND MOMENT CAPACITIES AT THE BALANCED STRAIN
CONDITION ARE 60 kips AND 87 ft-kips.

Pm (kips)
Mm (ft-kips)
AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY
AT LARGE AXIAL LOAD
AT 0 % TENSION
AT 25 % TENSION
AT 50 % TENSION
AT BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION
AT SMALL AXIAL LOAD
AT FLEXURE ONLY
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
148
116
58
85
85
77
87
71
88
60
87
17
69
59
THE DESIGN FORCES P & M ARE ALSO PLOTTED ON THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM. FROM THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM,
THE ALLOWABLE MOMENT AT AN AXIAL LOAD P IS
Mm =
65
ft-kips.
>
M
[Satisfactory]
THE ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS IS GIVEN BY
( SF ) MIN
Fv, without reinf.
( SF ) MIN (
=
23.33
psi
1
4 MT
Vd
3
f
>
'
m
'
fm ,
80
45M T
Vd
, 35) , for M T 1.0

Vd
fv
[Satisfactory]
, for M T < 1.0

Vd
( SF ) MIN
Fv, max.
1
4 MT
2
Vd
( SF ) MIN (1.5
=
38.73
psi
>
'
m
fv
'
fm ,
120
45M T
Vd
, for M T < 1.0

Vd
, 75) , for M T 1.0

Vd
[Satisfactory]
CHECK THE MINIMUM AREA OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED :
V
F sd
0.05
in / ft
<
Av =
s
0.15
in / ft
(No shear reinf. reqd.)
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
Tian Li
JOB NO. :
Masonry Shear Wall Design Based on UBC 97
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
LATERAL PERFORMANCE CATEGORY
1
1
1.5
60
4
Yes
CMU
ksi
ksi
Zone 4
( 0=Wind,1=Zone 1, 2=Zone 2, 3=Zone 3, 4=Zone 4, 5=Gravity Only)
SERVICE AXIAL LOAD

SERVICE SHEAR LOAD
SERVICE MOMENT LOAD
THICKNESS OF WALL
LENGTH OF WALL
P
V
M
t
w
=
=
=
=
=
245
160
8550
10
29
hw
EFFECTIVE HEIGHT of WALL
VERT. REINF. AT EACH END (As)
2
WALL HORIZ. REINF. (Ash)
2
=
2
#
#
10
#
4
9
k
k
ft-k
in
ft
ft
9
@
@
ANALYSIS
REINF. AREA AT EACH END
GROSS WALL AREA
EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF WALL
EFFECTIVE THICKNESS OF WALL
As
Ag
d
bw
Em
Es
=
=
=
=
=
=
2.00
3480
344
9.63
'
m
)=
0.660
fv=
= 0.162
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0
2000
4000
6000
Mm (ft-k)
) ( 24) =
32.00 ksi
10150.00
ft-kips
Pm (k)
& seismic only
M T = M +V hw =
277.6 kips
8000
10000
12000
in
MODULAR RATIO
n =
25.78
REINFORCEMENT RATIO
=
0.0006
SF =
1.333
2
REQD MIN. HORIZ. REINF.
Ash,min =
0.300 in /ft
Ssh,max =
16
in
2
REQD MIN. VERT. REINF.
Asv,min =
0.100 in /ft
Ssv,max =
40
in
THE TOTAL MOMENT ACTING AT BOTTOM IS
k = 2n + ( n ) n
DIST. FR BAR'S CENT. TO END

a
=
4
in o.c.
in o.c.
F S = (1.33wind
ksi
THE TOTAL AXIAL FORCE ACTING AT BOTTOM IS
PT = P + ( wall weight ) =
in2
in2
in
in
1125 ksi
29000 ksi
F b = ( SF ) 0.33 f
=>
16
8
1.5V
jb wl w
psi, (UBC 2107.1.7)

76
(The factor 1.5 for zone 3 & 4 only)
THE ACI 530-02 SEC. 2.3.2.2.1 PERMITS COMPRESSION FORCES TO BE RESISTED BY COMPRESSION REINFORCEMENT
ONLY IF THE LATERAL SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS OF ACI 530-02 SEC. 2.1.6.5 ARE MET. SINCE IT IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE
TO MEET THESE PROVISIONS IN WALLS, THE CONTRIBUTION OF REINFORCING STEEL TO COMPRESSIVE FORCE
MAY BE NEGLECTED.
THE MAXIMUN DESIGN AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH IS P m = t Lw Fb =
2296.8 kips. THE DESIGN MOMENT CAPACITY

AT MAXIMUM AXIAL LOAD STRENGTH IS 0 ft-kips.
THE DESIGN AXIAL AND MOMENT CAPACITIES AT THE WALL CRACKED BUT STEEL STRESS ZERO ARE 1514 kips
AND 7484 ft-kips.
FOR THE BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION UNDER COMBINED FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOAD, THE MAXIMUM STRAIN IN
THE MASONRY AND IN THE TENSION REINFORCEMENT MUST SIMULTANEOUSLY REACH THE VALUES AS
m = Fb / Em and
s = Fs / Es . THE DESIGN AXIAL AND MOMENT CAPACITIES AT THE BALANCED STRAIN
CONDITION ARE 1028 kips AND 9235 ft-kips.

Pm (kips)
Mm (ft-kips)
AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY
AT LARGE AXIAL LOAD
AT 0 % TENSION
AT 25 % TENSION
AT 50 % TENSION
AT BALANCED STRAIN CONDITION
AT SMALL AXIAL LOAD
AT FLEXURE ONLY
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2297
1905
4710
1514
7484
1379
8061
1256
8509
1028
9235
270
11334
10918
THE DESIGN FORCES P & M ARE ALSO PLOTTED ON THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM. FROM THE INTERACTION DIAGRAM,
THE ALLOWABLE MOMENT AT AN AXIAL LOAD P IS
Mm =
11410 ft-kips.
>
M
[Satisfactory]
( SF ) MIN
Fv, without reinf.
( SF ) MIN (
=
46.67
psi
1
4 MT
Vd
3
f
<
'
m
'
fm ,
80
45M T
Vd
, for M T < 1.0

Vd
, 35) , for M T 1.0

Vd
fv
(Shear reinf. reqd to carry full shear load.)
( SF ) MIN
Fv, max.
1
4 MT
2
Vd
( SF ) MIN (1.5
=
77.46
psi
>
'
m
fv
'
fm ,
120
45M T
Vd
, for M T < 1.0

Vd
, 75) , for M T 1.0

Vd
[Satisfactory]
V
F sd
0.17
in / ft
<
Av =
s
0.30
in / ft
[Satisfactory]
3. "Seismic Design of Masonry Using the 1997 UBC", Concrete Masonry Association of NV & CA, 2003.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Masonry Bearing Wall Design Based on ACI 530-02
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
P
=
SERVICE LATERAL LOAD
w1
=
=
SERVICE PARAPET LOAD
w2
THICKNESS OF WALL
t
=
=
PARAPET HEIGHT
hp
WALL HEIGHT
h
=
ECCENTRICITY
e
=
2
#
0
1
1.5
60
400
25
45
8
4
20
6
6
No
CMU
ksi
ksi
lbs / ft
plf / ft
plf / ft
in
ft
ft
in
@
ANALYSIS
REINF. AREA AT EACH SIDE
As
=
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
d
=
=
WIDTH OF SECTION
bw
EFFECTIVE THICKNESS
te
=
Em
=
=
Es
F b = ( SF ) 0.33 f
'
m
)=
330
0.33
5.26
12.00
7.63
1350
29000
16
in2
in
in
in
ksi
ksi
S = h+ hp
( h+h p )
2h
Pe
h w1
V 2 = h w1 V 1
= 10.0
M1 =
ft
V 3 = h p w2
=
=
180
21.48
0.0052
0.667
= 0.37489
& seismic only
) ( 24000 ) =
32000 psi
THE GOVERNING MOMENTS AND AXIAL FORCES ARE
( h + h p ) w1 + Pe
2h
k = 2n + ( n ) n
F S = (1.33wind
psi
THE GOVERNING SHEAR FORCES ARE
V 1 = ( h + h p ) w1
MODULAR RATIO
n =
REINFORCEMENT RATIO
=
SF =
THE DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM TO M1 IS

2
in o.c. (at each face)

250
lbs / ft
250 lbs / ft
1
2 w1h 2
Pe+ w1 ( h 2 h2p )
2
P1 = P + ( wall weight ) =
2
w2h p
=
360
ft-lbs/ft
M2=
2
P 2 = P + ( wall weight )
1250
ft-lbs/ft
1613
lbs / ft
747
lbs / ft
THE GOVERNING SHEAR STRESS IN MASONRY IS
fv=
lbs / ft
MAX (V 1 , V 2 , V 3 )
23
t eb w
2.73
psi
DETERMINE THE REGION FOR FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOAD (MDG Tab 12.2.1, Fig 12.2-12 & 13, page 12-25).
M
t
e
Pd 6 d
1. Wall is in compression and not cracked.
M
te 1
2d 3
Pd
2. Wall is cracked but steel is in compression.
M
te 1
>
2d 3
Pd
3. Wall is cracked and steel is in tension.
REGION 3 APPLICABLE FOR (M1, P1)
(cont'd)
CHECK REGION 1 CAPACITY
Mm=
b wt e
te
Fb P =
6
6
3031 ft-lbs / ft
>
M1
[Not applicable]
3123 ft-lbs / ft
>
M2
[Not applicable]

476
2P 2
te
=
Mm=P
2 3b w F b
ft-lbs / ft <
M1
[Not applicable]
230
ft-lbs / ft <
M2
[Not applicable]
CHECK REGION 3 CAPACITY (The moment maybe limited by either the masonry compression or steel tension, MDG page 12-25).
M m = MIN
kd
1
t
P d e
b wkd F b d
2
3
2
, AsF s d
1301
ft-lbs / ft
>
M1
[Satisfactory]
1405
ft-lbs / ft
>
M2
[Satisfactory]
kd
t kd
+P e
3
2 3
F v = ( SF ) MIN
'
m
, 50
25.82 psi
>
fv
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Masonry Bearing Wall Design Based on UBC 97
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
=
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
SERVICE DEAD LOAD
PDL
=
LATERAL LOAD (E/1.4 or W)
w1
=
=
LATERAL LOAD (E/1.4 or W)
w2
THICKNESS OF WALL
t
=
=
PARAPET HEIGHT
hp
WALL HEIGHT
h
=
ECCENTRICITY
e
=
1
#
=
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
Ca
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
I
=
1
1.5
60
625
26.9
26.9
8
0
23
8
5
0.484
1
CMU
ksi
ksi
lbs / ft
plf / ft
plf / ft
in
ft
ft
in
@
0.23
in /ft
ANALYSIS
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
WIDTH OF SECTION
GROSS MOMENT OF INERTIA
As
16
in o.c. (at middle)

te =
EFFECTIVE THICKNESS
7.63
in
ksi
3.82
in
Em =
1125
bw
12.00
in
Es =
29000 ksi
Ig
444
in4/ft
MODULAR RATIO
25.78
CHECK REINFORCING RATIO (UBC 2108.2.4.2)

= As / d bw =
0.005
<
0.5b = 0.5{0.85(0.85)fm'(0.003Es) / [fy(0.003Es+fy)] =
0.005
[Satisfactory]
CHECK WALL SLENDERNESS REQUIRED BY EQ(8-19)
(Pw + Pf) / Ag =
Pw =
where
16.5 psi
<
0.04 fm' =
(0.5 h + hp)(115 psf) t =
60
882
psi
[Satisfactory]
Pf =
lbs / ft ,
625
lbs / ft
THE CRACKING MOMENT STRENGTH IS

Mcr = S fr = (bw te2 / 6)(4 fm'0.5) =
1503
ft-lbs/ft
CHECK CAPACITY OF LOAD COMBINATION UBC(12-6), 0.9D+Eh

Pu = 0.9 (PDL + Pw) =
lbs/ft
1370
THE DEPTH OF THE COMPRESSIVE STRESS BLOCK IS

a = (Pu + As fy) / (0.85 fm' bw) =
1.00
THE DEPTH OF NEUTRAL AXIS IS
in
c = a/ 0.85 =
THE EFFECTIVE AREA OF REINFORCING STEEL IS

2
Ase = (Pu + As fy) / fy =
0.26 in /ft
1.18
THE MOMENT AND DEFLECTION AT THE MID-HEIGHT OF THE WALL ARE GIVEN BY
1st Cycle
2nd Cycle
2
in
THE CRACKED MOMENT OF INERTIA IS

4
2
3
Icr = n Ase(d-c) + bc / 3 = 52 in /ft
u = 5Mcrh /(48EmIg) + 5(Mu - Mcr)h /(48EmIcr) =

2
Mu = wuh /8 + Puf e/2 + Puu =
0
2678
> Mcr
3rd Cycle
Final
2.187
2.591
2.683
in
2927
2974
2984
ft-lbs/ft
[Satisfactory]
=> Eq (8-29) Applicable
THE MOMENT CAPACITY OF THE WALL IS

Mn = [Asefy(d-a/2) - Pu(d-te/2)] =
<= Not applicable
Mn = Asefy(d-a/2) =
3385
>
ft-lbs/ft
Mu
[Satisfactory]
where = 0.8, (SEC 2108.1.4.2.1)

CHECK DEFLECTION LIMITATION BY SEC. 2108.2.4.6
s = 5Mcrh2/(48EmIg) + 5(Mser - Mcr)h2/(48EmIcr) =
2
Mser = wh /8 + Pf e/2 + Ps =
1st Cycle
2nd Cycle
1.069
1987
> Mcr
[Satisfactory]
0.007 h =
1.93
in
>
[Satisfactory]
2123
3rd Cycle
Final
1.289
1.346
in
2151
2158
ft-lbs/ft
(cont'd)
CHECK CAPACITY OF LOAD COMBINATION UBC(12-5), (1.2+0.5CaI)D+0.5L+Eh

Pu = (1.2+0.5CaI)(PDL + Pw) =
2195
lbs/ft
THE DEPTH OF THE COMPRESSIVE STRESS BLOCK IS

a = (Pu + As fy) / (0.85 fm' bw) =
1.06
THE DEPTH OF NEUTRAL AXIS IS
in
c = a/ 0.85 =
THE EFFECTIVE AREA OF REINFORCING STEEL IS

2
Ase = (Pu + As fy) / fy =
0.27 in /ft
1.24
in
THE CRACKED MOMENT OF INERTIA IS

4
Icr = n Ase(d-c)2 + bc3 / 3 = 51 in /ft
THE MOMENT AND DEFLECTION AT THE MID-HEIGHT OF THE WALL ARE GIVEN BY
wu = 1.4 w1 =
37.7 plf / ft
u = 5Mcrh /(48EmIg) + 5(Mu - Mcr)h /(48EmIcr) =

2
Mu = wuh /8 + Puf e/2 + Puu =
1st Cycle
2nd Cycle
2.413
2791
> Mcr
3rd Cycle
3232
[Satisfactory]
Final
3.142
3.457
in
3365
3423
ft-lbs/ft
THE MOMENT CAPACITY OF THE WALL IS

Mn = [Asefy(d-a/2) - Pu(d-te/2)] =
<= Not applicable
Mn = Asefy(d-a/2) =
3538
>
ft-lbs/ft
Mu
[Satisfactory]
where = 0.8, (SEC 2108.1.4.2.1)

CHECK DEFLECTION LIMITATION BY SEC. 2108.2.4.6
s = 5Mcrh2/(48EmIg) + 5(Mser - Mcr)h2/(48EmIcr) =
2
Mser = wh /8 + Pf e/2 + Ps =
1st Cycle
2nd Cycle
1.069
1987
> Mcr
[Satisfactory]
0.007 h =
1.93
in
>
2123
3rd Cycle
Final
1.289
1.346
in
2151
2158
ft-lbs/ft
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY BY SEC. 2108.2.4.5

Vn = 2 Amv (fm')0.5 =
4255
lbs/ft
where = 0.6
>
Vu = 1.4 [w1h/2 + w2(h + 0.5hP)hP/h + PDLe/h] =

[Satisfactory]
CHECK PARAPET BENDING CAPACITY

Mn
>
Mu
[Not applicable]
458
lbs/ft
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Design for Girder at Masonry Wall Based on ACI 530-02
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
GIRDER SERVICE LOAD
PG
=
ECCENTRICITY
e
=
1
1
1.5
60
37
3
Yes
CMU
ksi
ksi
kips
in
BEARING LENGTH
Lbr
20
in

THICKNESS OF WALL
PARAPET HEIGHT
WALL HEIGHT
w1
w2
t
hp
h
=
=
=
=
=
25
45
8
2
15
psf
psf
in
ft
ft

@
16
2
#
7
in o.c. (at each face)
ANALYSIS
te
EFFECTIVE THICKNESS
7.63
in
8789
lbs / ft
370
psi
375
psi
EFFECTIVE LENGTH (ACI 530, 2.1.9.1)

Le = 4te + Lbr =
50.52
P = PG / Le
LOAD DISTRIBUTION
in
CHECK BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 530, 2.1.9.3)

fbr = PG / [(t - 3) Lbr]
=
0.25 fm' =
<
[Satisfactory]
As
=
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
d
=
=
WIDTH OF SECTION
bw
Em
=
Es
=
MODULAR RATIO
n
=
F b = ( SF ) 0.33 f
'
m
)=
660
0.45
5.19
12.00
1350
29000
21.48
S = h+ hp
( h+h p )
2h
Pe
h w1
in
in
ksi
ksi
REINFORCEMENT RATIO
=
SF =
k = 2n + ( n ) n
2
0.0072
1.333
= 0.42309
F S = (1.33wind
psi
THE DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM TO M1 IS

2
in2
& seismic only
) ( 24000 ) =
32000 psi
THE GOVERNING MOMENTS AND AXIAL FORCES ARE

= 13.2
ft
M1 =
1
2 w1h 2
Pe+ w1 ( h 2 h2p )
2
P1 = P + ( wall weight )
2186
9116
ft-lbs/ft
lbs / ft
(cont'd)
THE GOVERNING SHEAR FORCES ARE
V 1 = ( h + h p ) w1
( h + h p ) w1 + Pe
2h
V 2 = h w1 V 1
V 3 = h p w2
44
90
lbs / ft
331
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
M2=
w2h
2
2
p
90
ft-lbs/ft
P 2 = P + ( wall weight )
8962
lbs / ft
THE GOVERNING SHEAR STRESS IN MASONRY IS
fv=
MAX (V 1 , V 2 , V 3 )
t eb w
3.61
psi
DETERMINE THE REGION FOR FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOAD (MDG Tab 12.2.1, Fig 12.2-12 & 13, page 12-25).
M
te 1
2d 3
Pd
M
t
e
Pd 6 d
1. Wall is in compression and not cracked.
M
te 1
>
2d 3
Pd
2. Wall is cracked but steel is in compression.
3. Wall is cracked and steel is in tension.


2
b wt e
te
Mm=
Fb P =
6
6
5438
ft-lbs / ft
>
M1
[Not applicable]
5454
ft-lbs / ft
>
M2
[Satisfactory]
M1
[Not applicable]

2315
2P 2
te
=
Mm=P
2 3b w F b
ft-lbs / ft >
2286
ft-lbs / ft >
M2
[Not applicable]
CHECK REGION 3 CAPACITY (The moment maybe limited by either the masonry compression or steel tension, MDG page 12-25).
M m = MIN
kd
1
t
P d e
b wkd F b d
2
3
2
, AsF s d
2187
ft-lbs / ft
>
M1
[Satisfactory]
2205
ft-lbs / ft
>
M2
[Not applicable]
kd
t kd
P e
+ 45
3
2 3
F v = ( SF ) MIN
'
m
, 50
51.64 psi
>
fv
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Masonry Beam Design Based on ACI 530-02

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
=
SERVICE SHEAR LOAD
V
=
SERVICE MOMENT LOAD
M
=
WIDTH
b
=
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
d
=
CLEAR SPAN
Lc
=
0
1
1.5
60
4.56
13.68
8
45
12
1
@
#
LOAD TYPE (1=SEISMIC, 0=WIND, 5=GRAVITY)
VERTICAL REINF.
1
4
2

CMU
ksi
ksi
k
ft-k
in
in
ft
Seismic
8
in o.c.
6
[THE BEAM DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
SF
ALLOWABLE REINF. STRESS (1.33wind & seismic only)Fs

ALLOWABLE MASONRY STRESS
Fb=(SF)(0.33fm')
Em
Es
EFFECTIVE WIDTH
bw
MODULAR RATIO
n
TENSION REINFORCEMENT RATIO
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.667
32
0.33
1350
29000
7.63
21.48
0.003
ksi
ksi
ksi, (Sec. 1.8.2.2.1)
ksi
in
[Satisfactory, Lc < 32 bw]
k = 2n + ( n ) n
2
THE LEVER-ARM FACTOR IS
j = 1
0.281
k
3
= 0.906
THE TENSILE STRESS IN REINFORCEMENT DUE TO FLEXURE IS
M
A s jd
fs=
4.574 ksi
<
Fs
[SATISFACTORY]
THE COMPRESSIVE STRESS IN THE EXTREME FIBER DUE TO FLEXURE IS
fb=
2M
jk b w d 2
0.08 ksi
<
Fb
[SATISFACTORY]
V
fv=
b wd
<
=
13
) MIN (
F v = ( SF 15.1
'
m
, 50) =
25.82 psi
[SATISFACTORY]
psi
<
(Sec. 2.3.5.2.1)
F v = ( SF ) MIN (3 f
'
m
, 150) =
77.46 psi
V
F sd
0.04
in2 / ft
<
Av =
s
0.30
in2 / ft
( No shear reinf. Reqd )
[SATISFACTORY]
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Masonry Beam Design Based on UBC 97

MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
=
SERVICE SHEAR LOAD
V
=
SERVICE MOMENT LOAD
M
=
WIDTH
b
=
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
d
=
CLEAR SPAN
Lc
=
1
1
1.5
60
15.1
83
12
40
12
5
@
#
VERTICAL REINF.
1
4
2
Yes, (Sec. 2107.1.2)

CMU
ksi
ksi
k
ft-k
in
in
ft
Gravity Only
8
in o.c.
7
[THE BEAM DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
SF
1.000
ALLOWABLE REINF. STRESS (1.33wind & seismic only)Fs

ALLOWABLE MASONRY STRESS
Fb=(SF)(0.33fm')
Em
Es
EFFECTIVE WIDTH
bw
MODULAR RATIO
n
TENSION REINFORCEMENT RATIO
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
24
ksi
0.495 ksi
750 fm' =
1125
29000 ksi
11.63 in
25.78
0.0026
ksi, (Eq. 6-4. 2106.2.12.1)

[Satisfactory, Lc < 32 bw]
k = 2n + ( n ) n
2
THE LEVER-ARM FACTOR IS
j = 1
0.304
k
3
= 0.899
THE TENSILE STRESS IN REINFORCEMENT DUE TO FLEXURE IS
M
A s jd
fs=
23.09 ksi
<
Fs
[SATISFACTORY]
THE COMPRESSIVE STRESS IN THE EXTREME FIBER DUE TO FLEXURE IS
fb=
2M
jk b w d 2
0.39 ksi
<
Fb
[SATISFACTORY]
V
fv=
jb wd
<
=
36
F v = ( SF ) MIN (
'
m
, 50) =
38.73 psi
[SATISFACTORY]
psi
<
(Sec. 2107.2.17)
F v = ( SF ) MIN (3 f
'
m
, 150) =
116.19 psi
V
F sd
0.19
in2 / ft
<
Av =
s
0.30
in / ft
[SATISFACTORY]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Masonry Column Design Based on ACI 530-02

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
=
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
LOAD TYPE ( 1=SEISMIC, 0=WIND, 5=GRAVITY)
SERVICE AXIAL LOAD
P
SERVICE SHEAR LOAD
V
MOMENT AT MIDHEIGHT
M
EFFECTIVE WIDTH
b
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
d
EFFECTIVE HEIGHT
h
VERTICAL REINF. (EACH SIDE)
HORIZ. TIES
2
legs #
0
1
1.5
60
1
50
9.5
8.2
15.63
15.63
15
#
@
=
=
=
=
=
=
2
4

CMU
ksi
ksi
Seismic
k
k
ft-k
in
in
DISTANCE BETWEEN COL. REINF.
a=
ft
6
8
in o.c.
[THE COLUMN DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
10.37
in
ANALYSIS
2
TOTAL REINFORCEMENT AREA
As
=
1.76 in
2
=
244 in
EFFECTIVE COLUMN AREA
An
4
NET EFFECTIVE MOMENT OF INERTIA In
=
4973 in
RADIUS OF GYRATION
r
=
4.51 in
Em
=
1350 ksi
=
29000 ksi
Es
CHECK VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT LIMITATION (ACI 530, 2.1.6.4)
2
As =
1.76 in
0.61
> 0.0025An =
<
0.04An =
9.77
THE ALLOWABLE STRESS DUE TO AXIAL LOAD ONLY IS
h
140r
'
F a = ( SF ) 0.25 f m 1.0
0.330
Pd
=
2
M Td =
2I t
[Satisfactory]
P + ( half col . weight )

At
F S = (1.33wind
ksi
0.155
& seismic only
) ( 24 ) =
32.0
I t = I n + ( 2n 1) As
11.5 ft-kips
a
2
( ( SF ) 0.25 f
'
m
6959
f m = f a+ f b =
0.310 ksi
< Fb, [Satisfactory]
THE AXIAL LOAD AT BASE OF THE COLUMN IS
P t = P + ( full col. weight ) =
1.0
53.435 k
h
140r
89.75 k
[for h/r < 99]
> Pt, [Satisfactory]
THE SHEAR DESIGN MAY BE DETERMIND FROM THE FOLLOWING EXPRESSION
V
fv=
bd
39
(Sec. 2.3.5.2.1)
V
=
F sd
0.23
in2 / ft
psi
>
F v = ( SF ) MIN ( f m , 50) =
'
25.82 psi
(Shear reinf. reqd to carry full shear load.)

<
<
in4
THE MAX.STRESS COMBINED AXIAL & FLEXURE IS
11.1 ksi
< Fs, [Satisfactory]
An + 0.65 F S A S
ksi
THE ALLOWABLE AXIAL LOAD FOR AXIAL COMPRESSION ONLY IS
Pa =
ksi
THE TRANSFORMED MOMENT OF INERTIA IS
0.154 ksi
< fa, [Satisfactory, the section is uncracked]
af b
=
d
[Satisfactory]
< Fa, [Satisfactory]

THE MAX. REINF. STRESS COMBINED AXIAL & FLEXURE IS
f S = 2n f a +
in2
fa=
0.230 ksi
THE STRESS IN THE EXTREME FIBER DUE TO MT IS
fb=
) )
in2
THE TOTAL MOMENT ACTING AT MIDHEIGHT IS
M T = M + ( 0.1)
( (
in
THE AXIAL STRESS AT MIDHEIGHT OF THE COLUMN IS
[for h/r < 99]

'
F b = ( SF ) 0.33 f m =
MODULAR RATIO
n =
21.48
REINFORCEMENT RATIO
=
0.009
SF =
0.667
12
MAX. TIES SPACING
Smax =
THE TRANSFORMED COLUMN AREA IS
2
At = An 1 + 2n 1 = 333 in
'
F v = ( SF ) MIN (3106f m , 150) =
Av =
s
0.60
in2 / ft
77.46 psi
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Masonry Column Design Based on UBC 97
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
REBAR YIELD STRESS

LOAD TYPE
fy
1
1
=
=
Yes, (Sec. 2107.1.2)

CMU
1.5
60
ksi
ksi
Zone 4
( 1=Zone 1, 2=Zone 2, 3=Zone 3, 4=Zone 4, 0=WIND, 5=GRAVITY)
SERVICE AXIAL LOAD
11.5
k, @ top of col.
MAX SHEAR LOAD

MOMENT AT MIDHEIGHT
V
M
=
=
20
106
k
ft-k, @ mid of col
EFFECTIVE WIDTH
EFFECTIVE DEPTH
b
c
=
=
23.63
23.63
in
in
EFFECTIVE HEIGHT
29
ft
VERTICAL REINF. (EACH SIDE)
HORIZ. TIES
legs #
As
An
=
=
In
r
=
=
Em
1125

MODULAR RATIO
Es
n
=
=
25.78
At = An(1-+n+n' )
696
DISTANCE BETWEEN COL. REINF.
in o.c.
[THE COLUMN DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
2.37
in2
REINFORCEMENT RATIO
558
in2
DISTANCE
ANALYSIS
REINFORCEMENT AREA AT ONE SIDE
EFFECTIVE COLUMN AREA

NET EFFECTIVE MOMENT OF INERTIA
RADIUS OF GYRATION
TRANSFORMED AREA
4
25982 in
6.82 in
ksi
29000 ksi
2
in
CHECK VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT LIMITATION (UBC 2107.2.13.1)

2
As,total =
> 0.005Ae = 0.005bd =
4.74 in
0.04Ae = 0.04bd =
<
a=
THE AXIAL LOAD AT MIDDLE OF THE COLUMN IS
= '
d' = 3.13 , d =

MAX. TIES SPACING
SF
Smax
17.37
in
0.005
20.50
1.333
in
in
NEUTRAL AXIS DEPTH FACTOR

2
2
k = {[n+(2n-1)' ] +2[n+(2n-1)(d'/d)]} - [n+(2n-1)' ]
LEVER-ARM FACTOR
2
j = 1-k/3
2.42
in
[Satisfactory]
19.38
in2
[Satisfactory]
0.310
0.897
THE TOTAL MOMENT ACTING AT MIDHEIGHT IS
P Mid = P + ( half col. weight ) =
M Mid = M + ( 0.1)
19.090 k
CHECK IF THERE IS TENSILE STRESS IN CROSS SECTION

2
34
psi
<
MMid / (bc /6) =
585 psi
PMid / A =
(tensile exist)
Pd
=
2
107.1 ft-kips
THE AXIAL LOAD AT BASE OF THE COLUMN IS
P t = P + ( full col. weight ) =
26.681 k
THE ALLOWABLE AXIAL LOAD FOR AXIAL COMPRESSION ONLY IS
'
P a = 0.25 f m An + 0.65 F S A st
1.0
h
140r
F S = (1.33wind
& seismic only
) ( 24 ) =
32.0
ksi
THE CORRESPONDING STRAIN IN THE TENSILE BARS IS
eS =
FS =
ES
THE STRESS IN THE EXTREME FIBER DUE TO MT IS

0.558
ksi
< Fb', [Satisfactory]
THE STRAIN IN THE COMPRESSION BARS IS

'
eS =
kd d
em =
kd
'
0.0002518
> Pt, [Satisfactory]
245.71 k
[for h/r < 99]
P Mid
'
F b = SF
Pa
( 0.33 f ) =
'
m
0.622
ksi
THE STRAIN IN THE EXTREME COMPRESSION FIBER IS
e m = MIN
0.0011
f b = em E m =
'
kd
Fb
es ,
d kd
Em
0.0004960
(steel governs)
THE MOMENT DUE TO THE MASONRY IS
Mm=
1
kd
bkd f b (d ) =
2
3
64.19
ft-kips
THE STRESS IN THE COMPRESSION BARS IS

'
f S = 2 E S e 'S =
14.602
ksi
(cont'd)
THE MOMENT DUE TO THE COMPRESSION BARS IS
'
'
'
M S = f S AS (d d ) =
50.09
THE ALLOWABLE BENDING MOMENT IS
M =M S + M m =
'
ft-kips
114.28 ft-kips
> Mt, [Satisfactory]
THE SHEAR DESIGN MAY BE DETERMIND FROM THE FOLLOWING EXPRESSION
V
fv=
jbd
40
(Sec. 2107.2.17)
V
F sd
0.32
in2 / ft
psi
<
'
F v = ( SF ) MIN ( f m , 50) =
51.64 psi
[Satisfactory]
<
<
F v = ( SF ) MIN (3 f m , 150) =
'
Av =
s
0.60
in2 / ft
154.92 psi
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Design for Bending Post at Top of Wall, Based on ACI 530-02 & UBC 97
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

fm'
MASONRY STRENGTH
1.5
REBER YIELD STRESS
fy
60
SERVICE BENDING LOAD

SERVICE SHEAR LOAD
WALL THICKNESS
ANCHORAGE REBARS
M
V
T
=
=
=
#
0.6
0.116
8
4
BASE PLATE YIELD STRESS
Fy
36
ksi
ksi
ft-kips
kips
in
@ middle of wall
ksi
BASE PLATE WIDTH

a
=
6
in
BASE PLATE LENGTH
b
=
10
in
(REQUIRED BASE PLATE THK. t = 3/8 in & MIN. REBAR SPLICE LENGTH Ls = 24 in)
[THE ANCHORAGE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]
ANALYSIS
DETERMINE BASE PLATE THICKNESS (AISC-ASD F2.1, page 5-48)
where
6M
4
b
3
( 0.75 F y )
3/8
in
(4/3) is seismic/wind factor, typical.
CHECK MASONRY BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 530 2.1.9.3 & UBC 2107.2.10)
fa=
2M
2
3
( 0.5a )
2T
b ( 0.5a )
7.20
kips
480
psi
4
0.25 f 'm =
3
<
500
psi
[SATISFACTORY]
where 0.25 is for ACI 530, while 0.26 shall be used for UBC.
CHECK REBAR CAPACITY (ACI 530 2.3.2.1 & UBC 2107.2.11)
T=
7.20
kips
<
(4/3) Fs As = (4/3) (24 ksi) As =
12.80
kips
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (ACI 530 2.1.4.2.3 & UBC 2107.1.5.3)
'
V allow = n MAX F 350 4 f m Ab , 0.12 f y Ab
where
n=
Lbe =
3.56
1.49
kips
>
(rebars numbers)
0.513
(edge reduction factor. Here 1" is for ACI 530, 1 1/2" shall be used for UBC.)
DETERMINE LAP SPLICE LENGTH (ACI 530 2.1.10.6.1.1, UBC 2107.2.2.3)

where
24.00
[SATISFACTORY]
in (rebar edge distance)
F = [MIN(Lbe , 12) -1"] / (12 - 1") =
L d = 0.002 d fs = 48 d =
in
for UBC, 50% increase may be used if rebar stress > 80%. (UBC 2107.2.12)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Group Fasteners in Combined Stresses Based on ACI 530-02 & CBC 2001
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

MASONRY STRENGTH
fm '
1.5
ksi
60
ksi
0.42
kips / ft
kips / ft
0.85
kips / ft
FASTENER YIELD STRESS

fy
TENSION STRESS, ASD
ba
SHEAR STRESS, VERTICAL

bv,V
SHEAR STRESS, HORIZONTAL

bv,H
WALL THICKNESS
b
in
FASTENER DIAMETER
1/2
in
EFFECTIVE EMBEDMENT
Lb
in
EDGE DISTANCE TO WALL TOP Lbe
16
in
FASTENER SPACING
12
in, o.c.
Seismic
<
Lb
ANALYSIS
CHECK MIN. EMBEDMENT (ACI 530 2.1.4.2.1)
Lb,min = MIN[ 4 , 2] = 2.00
in
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK TENSION CAPACITY FOR A FASTENER (ACI 530 2.1.4.2.2 & CBC 2107A.1.5.2)
Ba = MIN[ 0.5Ap(fm')0.5 , 0.2Abfy] =
1.52
>
Where
L = MIN[ Lb , Lbe] =
5.00
= COS-1(0.5S / L) = 0.00
Aseg = L2 [ - 0.5 SIN(2)] =
k S ba [SATISFACTORY]
in
rad
0.00
Ap = L2 - 2Aseg =
78.54
in2
Ab = 2 / 4 =
0.20
in2
k = 1.4 (3/4) =
1.05
kips / fastener
in2
Seismic
, (IBC 2003 1620.2 & CBC 1633.2.8.1)
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (ACI 530 2.1.4.2.3 & CBC 2107A.1.5.3)

Bv = MIN[ (F)350(Abfm')1/4 , 0.12Abfy] =
Where
1.41
>
S bv,V
, Gravity only
>
k S bv
, Combined shear [SATISFACTORY]
F = [MIN(Lbe , 12) -1] / (12 - 1) =

0.5
bv = (bv,V + bv,H)
kips / fastener
[SATISFACTORY]
1.000
1.312
kips / ft
CHECK COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION CAPACITY (ACI 530 2.1.4.2.4 & CBC 2107A.1.5.4)
S ba / Ba + S bv / Bv =
1.20
<
4/3
[SATISFACTORY]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Double Fasteners in Tension & Shear Based on ACI 530-02 & CBC 2001
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

fm'
1.5
ksi
fy
60
ksi
SERVICE TENSION LOAD
ba
0.91
kips / 2 fasteners
SERVICE SHEAR LOAD
bv
0.728
kips / 2 fasteners
WALL THICKNESS
FASTENER DIAMETER
=
=
8
3/4
EFFECTIVE EMBEDMENT
Lb
MASONRY STRENGTH
FASTENER SPACING
S
LOAD TYPE
(1=SEISMIC, 0=WIND, 5=GRAVITY)
in
in
in
6
1
in
Seismic
0.42
ANALYSIS
Lb,min = MIN[ 4 , 2] =
2.00
<
in
Lb
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK TENSION CAPACITY (ACI 530 2.1.4.2.2 & CBC 2107A.1.5.2)

Ba = 2 MIN[ 0.5Ap(fm')
0.5
, 0.2Abfy] =
1.40
kips / 2 fasteners
k ba
[SATISFACTORY]
>
Where
Lbe =
3.44
in
3.44
in
-1
0.51
rad
= COS (0.5S / L) =
Aseg = L2 [ - 0.5 SIN(2)] =
1.00
Ap = L2 - Aseg =
36.18
in2
Ab = 2 / 4 =
0.44
in
k=
3/4
in
Seismic

Bv = 2 MIN[ (F)350(Abfm')
1/4
, 0.12Abfy] =
>
Where
1.08
kips / 2 fasteners
k bv
[SATISFACTORY]
F = [MIN(Lbe , 12) -1] / (12 - 1) =
0.305
b a / Ba + b v / Bv =
1.32
<
4/3
[SATISFACTORY]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Group Fasteners in Tension & Shear Based on ACI 530-02 & CBC 2001
fm'
1.5
ksi
fy
60
ksi
UPLIFT STRESS, ASD
ba
0.9
kips / ft
SHEAR STRESS IN WALL DIR
bv
0.045
kips / ft
WALL THICKNESS
FASTENER DIAMETER
=
=
8
1/2
EFFECTIVE EMBEDMENT
Lb
in
12
1
in, o.c.
Seismic
MASONRY STRENGTH
FASTENER SPACING
S
LOAD TYPE
(1=SEISMIC, 0=WIND, 5=GRAVITY)
in
in
ANALYSIS
Lb,min = MIN[ 4 , 2] =
2.00
<
in
Lb
[SATISFACTORY]
CHECK TENSION CAPACITY FOR A FASTENER (ACI 530 2.1.4.2.2 & CBC 2107A.1.5.2)
Ba = MIN[ 0.5Ap(fm')
0.5
, 0.2Abfy] =
0.77
>
Where
Lbe =
3.57
k S ba [SATISFACTORY]
in
3.57
in
-1
0.00
rad
= COS (0.5S / L) =
Aseg = L2 [ - 0.5 SIN(2)] =
0.00
Ap = L2 - 2Aseg =
39.93
in2
Ab = 2 / 4 =
0.20
in
k=
3/4
kips / fastener
in
Seismic

Bv = MIN[ (F)350(Abfm')
1/4
, 0.12Abfy] =
>
Where
0.74
k S bv
F = [MIN(Lbe , 12) -1] / (12 - 1) =
kips / fastener
[SATISFACTORY]
0.513
S b a / Ba + S b v / Bv =
1.22
<
4/3
[SATISFACTORY]
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Masonry Wall Design at Horizontal Bending, Based on ACI 530-02
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

=
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
=
w
=
THICKNESS OF WALL
t
=
WALL HEIGHT
h
=
PILASTER SPACING
L
=
=
PILASTER SIZE
c1
=
c2
WALL HORIZ. REINF. (Asv)
1
#
0
1
1.5
60
45
8
24
10
24
24
4
No
CMU
ksi
ksi
psf
in
ft
ft
in
in
@

48
in o.c. (at middle)
ANALYSIS
DESIGN CRITERIA
1. Pilaster spacing less than one half the unsupported vertical span of out-of-plane wall. (MDG-3,page 11-8)
L=
10
ft
<
0.5 h =
12 ft
[Satisfactory]
2. Pilaster stiffness greater than that the tributary area of wall. (CBC 2106A.1.7)
120 in, (ACI 530, 1.7.5.1 & 1.9.4.2.3)
beff = c1 + 12 t =
y=
7.4
in
52809 E
,(ACI 530, 1.9.2)
E Ipilaster =
4096 E
,(ACI 530, 1.9.2)
10
E Iwall =
E Ipilaster
>
E Iwall
[Satisfactory]
CHECK WALL HORIZONTAL BENDING CAPACITY

d
=
3.82 in, effective depth
bw
=
12 in
te
=
7.63 in, effective thickness
2
=
0.05 in / ft
As
k = 2 n + ( n ) n =
2
)=
1350
29000
21.48
0.0011
0.667
ksi
ksi
, modular ratio
, reinforcement ratio
, allowable stress factor
0.1944
F b = ( SF ) 0.33 f
'
m
M allowable = MIN
1
kd
b wkd F b d
2
3
F S = 1.33 ( 24000 ) =
330 psi
w ( L c1 )
=
8
=
=
=
=
=
Em
Es
n
SF
, As F s d
kd
3
32000 psi
437 ft-lbs/ft, (MDG-3, page 11-3)
max
360 ft-lbs/ft
<
M allowable
[Satisfactory]

F v = ( SF ) MIN
'
m
, 50 =
26
psi
>
f v = 0.5 (L - c 1 ) w / (b w d) =
4
[Satisfactory]
psi
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Development & Splice of Reinforcement in Masonry Based on CBC 2001, ASD

TENSION DEVELOPMENT
Ld
0.002 Fs db
48 db
68
in
CBC 2107.2.2.3
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, CBC 2107.2.11
COMPRESSION DEVELOPMENT
Ld
0.0015Fs db
36 db
51
in
CBC 2107.2.2.3
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, CBC 2107.2.11
ANCHORAGE OF FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT

Lanchor = MAX ( h , 12 db ) =
34 db
48
in, CBC 2106.3.4
CBC 2107.2.2.3
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
48
in
TENSION SPLICE WITH MORE 80% STRESS

Ls
1.5 MAX( Ld , 40 db )
102
in
CBC 2107.2.2.6 & 2107.2.12

( DSA : Ls
where
1.5 MAX( Ld , 48 db )
102
in )
CBC 2107A.2.2.6 & 2107A.2.12

#
11
Bar size
db
1.41
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, CBC 2107.2.11
Ld
68
in, CBC 2107.2.2.3

5
TENSION SPLICE WITH 80% STRESS OR LESS

Ls
MAX( Ld , 40 db )
68
in
CBC 2107.2.2.6
( DSA : Ls
MAX( Ld , 48 db )
68
in )
CBC 2107A.2.2.6
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, CBC 2107.2.11
Ld
68
in, CBC 2107.2.2.3
COMPRESSION SPLICE
Ls
MAX( Ld , 30 db )
51
in
CBC 2107.2.2.6
( DSA : Ls
MAX( Ld , 36 db )
51
in )
CBC 2107A.2.2.6
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, CBC 2107.2.11
Ld
51
in, CBC 2107.2.2.3
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Development & Splice of Reinforcement in Masonry Based on CBC 2001, SD

TENSION OR COMPRESSION DEVELOPMENT
Ld
MAX (Lde / , 12) =
65 db
92
in
CBC 2108.2.2.6
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
fy
60
ksi
fm'
2.5
ksi
K = 3 db
4.23
in
Lde = MIN[0.15 db2 fy / (K fm' 0.5 ) , 52 db] =
( DSA : Ld
0.8
MAX (Lde / , 12) =
73
in
, CBC 2108.1.4.6.1
75 db
Lde = 0.15 db2 fy / (K fm' 0.5 ) =
=
85
106
in
in, CBC 8A-13 )

Lanchor = MAX ( h , 12 db ) =
34 db
48
in, CBC 2106.3.4
CBC 2107.2.2.3
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
48
in
TENSION OR COMPRESSION SPLICE

Ls
MAX (Lde / , 12) =
65 db
92
in
CBC 2108.2.2.6
where
Bar size
11
db
1.41
in
fy
60
ksi
fm'
2.5
ksi
K = 3 db
4.23
in
48
Lde = MIN[0.15 db2 fy / (K fm' 0.5 ) , 52 db] =
( DSA : Ls
MAX (Lde / , 12) =
0.8
73
in
, CBC 2108.1.4.6.2
75 db
Lde = 0.15 db2 fy / (K fm' 0.5 ) =
=
85
106
in
in, CBC 8A-13 )
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Development & Splice of Reinforcement in Masonry Based on ACI 530-02

TENSION DEVELOPMENT
Ld
MAX( 0.0015Fs db , 12 ) =
36 db
23
in
ACI 530-02 2.1.10.2

where
Bar size
db
0.625
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, ACI 530-02 2.3.2.1
COMPRESSION DEVELOPMENT
Ld
0.0015Fs db
36 db
23
in
ACI 530-02 2.1.10.2

where
Bar size
db
0.625
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, ACI 530-02 2.3.2.1

Lanchor = MAX ( d , 12 db ) =
where
Bar size
64 db
40
in, ACI 530-02 2.1.10.3.1.3
30
in
db
0.625
in
40
in
TENSION OR COMPRESSION SPLICE

Ld
0.002Fs db
48 db
ACI 530-02 2.1.10.6.1.1

where
Bar size
db
0.625
in
fy
60
ksi
Fs
24
ksi, ACI 530-02 2.3.2.1
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Elevator Masonry Wall Design Based on CBC 2001 Chapter A
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
MASONRY STRENGTH
fm'
1.5
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy
60
ksi
THICKNESS OF WALL
HORIZ. BENDING SPAN
t
L
=
=
8
10.17
in
ft
SEISMIC COFFICIENT
Ca
0.44
(CBC Tab 16A-Q)
IMPORTACE FACTOR
IP
1.15
(CBC Tab 16A-K)
ELEVATOR CAR WEIGHT
Wcar
2.5
kips
ELEVATOR RATED LOAD
Wrat
kips
WALL HORIZ. REINF. (As)
in o.c. (at middle)

[THE WALL DESIGN IS NOT ADEQUATE, SEE BELOW.]
ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS
Fp=
a pC a I pW p
1+
1.4 R p
hx
=
hr
ap = 1.0
Where :
0.482 Wp
37
Rp = 3.0
(CBC Tab.16A-O)
psf , ASD
Wp =
76.7
hx = hr
psf
(CBC Tab.16A-O)
( attachement height, CBC 1633A.2,

horizontal bending, hx dynamic)
P=
Where :
2
12"
0.5 (W car + 40%W rat )
=
b
3
1.85
kip / ft , ASD
Factor 2/3 , 0.5 , & 40% from CBC 1633A.2.13.1

b=
8.0
in, CBC 2106A.3.8
M max =
F p L 2 PL
+
=
8
4
5.18 ft-kip / ft , ASD
(simple beam since wall cracked)
CHECK HORIZONTAL BENDING CAPACITY
M allowable = MIN
1
kd
b wkd F b d
2
3
, As F s d
kd
3
2.21
ft-kip / ft , ASD
<
Where :
bw =
12
As =
0.66
k=
0.567
in,
2
in / ft
te =
in,
= 0.0144
Fb =
660
psi
d=
n=
25.8
Fs =
32000
M max
in
psi
[Unsatisfactory]
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wood Joist Design Based on NDS 2001, ICC PFC-4354 & PFC-5803
L =
JOIST SPAN
35
DL =
DEAD LOAD
22
LL =
LIVE LOAD / SNOW
15.5
S =
JOIST SPACING
24
CD =
DURATION FACTOR
1.25
AVAILABLE MINIMUM Douglas Fir-Larch SIZES
ft
psf, (w/o self Wt)
psf
in o.c.
(NDS Tab. 2.3.2)
AVAILABLE MINIMUM TJI SIZES

30" TJI/L65
28" TJI/L90
AVAILABLE MINIMUM SSI SIZES
28" SSI 42MX
REPETITIVE FACTOR
Cr =
1.15
(NDS 4.3.9. For DSA, 1.0)
LL = L / 360
DEFLECTION LIMIT OF LIVE LOAD
1.5(DL+0.33LL) = L / 480
DEFLECTION LIMIT OF LONG-TERM LOAD
(DL+LL) = L / 240
DEFLECTION LIMIT OF TOTAL LOAD
26" TJI/H90
26" SSI 43LX
( L / 360 , 1.2 in )
( L / 480 , 0.9 in )
( L / 240 , 1.8 in )
ANALYSIS
JOIST PROPERTIES & ALLOWABLE MOMENT & SHEAR
2x No. 2, Douglas Fir-Larch ( ASD Supplements, Tab. 5.4a)
EI x 106
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
2
(in -lbs)
(CF included)
4
6
8
10
12
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
4130
8850
14200
21200
28500
630
990
1310
1670
2030
9
33
76
158
285
Deep (in)
1.00
6890
10
2.00
14700
990
40
8
10
12
2.00
3.00
4.00
23700
35300
47500
1310
1670
2030
91
188
338
EI x 106
2
(in -lbs)
450
666
913
1205
1545
1934
2374
2868
3417
4025
TJI/L65 ( from Trusjoist # 1062, page 5)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
EI x 106
2
(in -lbs)
630
990
1305
1665
2025
9
35
81
168
303
(CF included)
4
6
8
10
12
2x Structural, Douglas Fir-Larch (ASD Supplements, Tab. 5.4a)

6
EI x 10
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
2
(in -lbs)
(CF included)
630
2x No. 1, Douglas Fir-Larch (from WoodBeam.xls)
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
4594
9831
15769
23530
31641
Where:
1.
ASD Supplements, Tab. 5.4a is from American Wood Council, 2001.
Assume that the joist top is fully lateral supported by diaphragm. (CL = 1.0)
2.
3.
WoodBeam.xls is at www.engineering-international.com
SSI 32MX ( from ICC PFC-5803, page 5 & 6)
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
3.30
3.60
3.90
4.20
4.40
4.70
5.00
5.30
5.50
5.80
6750
8030
9210
10380
11540
12690
13830
14960
16085
17205
1925
2125
2330
2535
2740
2935
3060
2900
2900
2900
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
3.10
3.30
3.60
3.90
4.10
4.40
4.70
5.00
5.20
5.50
5391
6570
7684
8800
9918
11038
12159
13279
14401
15524
2115
2330
2530
2735
2935
3135
3335
3540
3740
3940
EI x 106
2
(in -lbs)
460
667
900
1170
1478
1824
2211
2638
3106
3616
C x 10
2
(in -lbs)
9.39
10.99
12.50
14.02
15.55
17.08
18.62
20.15
21.68
23.21
EI x 10
2
(in -lbs)
637
924
1246
1617
2040
2514
3042
3622
4257
4948
C x 10
2
(in -lbs)
9.54
11.15
12.68
14.22
15.77
17.32
18.87
20.42
21.97
23.53
EI x 106
(in2-lbs)
707
1031
1394
1944
2454
3026
3661
4358
5119
5944
C x 106
(in2-lbs)
6.81
7.91
8.97
10.05
11.13
12.21
13.30
14.39
15.47
16.56
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
4.20
4.50
4.70
5.00
5.30
5.60
5.80
6.10
6.40
6.60
9605
11430
13115
14785
16435
18075
19700
21315
22915
24510
1925
2125
2330
2535
2740
2935
3060
2900
2900
2900
EI x 10
2
(in -lbs)
621
913
1246
1635
2085
2597
3172
3814
4525
5306
TJI/H90 ( from Trusjoist # 1062, page 5)
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
3.80
4.10
4.30
4.60
4.90
5.10
5.40
5.70
6.00
6.20
7592
9274
10863
12456
14051
15649
17248
18849
20450
22052
2060
2350
2620
2895
3165
3440
3710
3985
4255
4530
SSI 43L ( from ICC PFC-5803, page 5 & 6)
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
4.60
4.90
5.20
5.40
5.70
6.00
6.30
6.50
6.80
7.10
10960
13090
15065
17010
18945
20855
22755
24645
26520
28380
1925
2125
2330
2535
2740
2935
3060
2900
2900
2900
EI x 10
(in2-lbs)
687
1015
1389
1827
2331
2904
3549
4266
5059
5930
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
4.60
4.90
5.20
5.40
5.70
5.90
6.20
6.40
6.70
7.00
9789
12081
14251
16269
18419
20573
22730
24889
27050
29212
2080
2260
2425
2590
2755
2920
3090
3255
3420
3585
(cont'd)
DESIGN EQUATIONS
M =
wL 2
8C D C r
T JI =
V =
22.5w L 4 2.26w L 2
+
EI
d 105
SSI =
w 2
5w L 4
+ L
384 EI
C
wL
2C D C r
DFL =
5w L
384 EI
( from Trusjoist # 1062, page 21)

( from ICC PFC-5803, page 2)
CHECK JOIST CAPACITIES & DEFLECTIONS

2x No. 2, Douglas Fir-Larch
Deep (in) M (ft-lbs)

4
6
8
10
12
8096
8202
8202
8309
8415
V (lbs)
925
937
937
950
962
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
D+L
(in)
CHECK
116.30
31.72
13.77
6.62
3.67
310.80
86.30
37.47
18.34
10.35
285.12
78.78
34.21
16.67
9.36
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
D+L
(in)
CHECK
925
937
937
950
962
104.67
26.17
11.50
5.57
3.10
279.72
71.20
31.29
15.42
8.73
256.61
65.00
28.57
14.01
7.89
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
D+L
(in)
CHECK
6.06
4.14
3.05
2.34
1.85
1.49
1.23
1.03
0.88
0.75
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.

4
6
8
10
12
8096
8202
8202
8309
8415
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
D+L
(in)
CHECK
925
937
937
950
962
116.30
29.91
12.92
6.23
3.45
310.80
81.37
35.16
17.25
9.73
285.12
74.28
32.10
15.68
8.80
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
D+L
(in)
CHECK
5.85
4.07
3.04
2.36
1.88
1.54
1.28
1.08
0.93
0.80
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
2x Structural, Douglas Fir-Larch

4
6
8
10
12
8096
8202
8202
8309
8415
TJI/L65
SSI 32MX

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
8341
8373
8405
8437
8458
8490
8522
8554
8575
8607
953
957
961
964
967
970
974
978
980
984
2.40
1.63
1.20
0.92
0.72
0.58
0.48
0.40
0.34
0.29
6.68
4.57
3.38
2.59
2.04
1.65
1.37
1.15
0.97
0.84
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
D+L
(in)
CHECK
4.49
3.10
2.30
1.78
1.41
1.15
0.95
0.80
0.69
0.59
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
D+L
(in)
CHECK
TJI/L90
8437
8468
8490
8522
8554
8586
8607
8639
8671
8692
964
968
970
974
978
981
984
987
991
993
1.76
1.21
0.89
0.69
0.54
0.44
0.37
0.31
0.26
0.23
4.97
3.43
2.55
1.97
1.57
1.28
1.06
0.90
0.77
0.66
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
TJI/H90
8319
8341
8373
8405
8426
8458
8490
8522
8543
8575
951
953
957
961
963
967
970
974
976
980
2.32
1.61
1.20
0.93
0.74
0.60
0.50
0.42
0.36
0.31
6.45
4.48
3.36
2.61
2.08
1.70
1.42
1.20
1.03
0.89
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
D+L
(in)
CHECK
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
8394
8426
8447
8479
8511
8532
8564
8596
8628
8650
4.30
2.99
2.24
1.74
1.40
1.14
0.96
0.81
0.70
0.60
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
D+L
(in)
CHECK
959
963
965
969
973
975
979
982
986
989
1.69
1.17
0.88
0.68
0.54
0.44
0.37
0.31
0.27
0.23
4.75
3.31
2.48
1.93
1.55
1.27
1.06
0.90
0.78
0.68
V (lbs)
LL
(in)
LT
(in)
SSI 43L

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
SSI 42MX

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
8479
8511
8543
8564
8596
8628
8660
8682
8713
8745
969
973
976
979
982
986
990
992
996
999
1.60
1.09
0.81
0.62
0.49
0.40
0.33
0.28
0.24
0.21
4.54
3.13
2.32
1.79
1.43
1.16
0.97
0.82
0.70
0.61
4.10
2.82
2.09
1.61
1.28
1.04
0.87
0.73
0.63
0.54
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
8479
8511
8543
8564
8596
8618
8650
8671
8703
8735
969
973
976
979
982
985
989
991
995
998
1.55
1.07
0.80
0.58
0.47
0.38
0.32
0.27
0.23
0.20
4.40
3.07
2.31
1.68
1.36
1.11
0.94
0.80
0.69
0.60
3.97
2.77
2.07
1.51
1.22
1.00
0.84
0.71
0.62
0.54
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Double Joist Design for Mechanical Equipment Based on NDS 2001, ICC PFC-4354 & PFC-5803
L =
30
JOIST SPAN
DL =
DEAD LOAD
26
S =
24
JOIST SPACING
CD =
DURATION FACTOR
1.33
DEFLECTION LIMITATION
AVAILABLE MINIMUM Douglas Fir-Larch SIZES

ft
psf, (w/o self Wt)
in o.c.
(NDS Tab. 2.3.2)
(DL+E) = L / 240
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT
HEIGHT OF MASS CENTER
EQUIPMENT LENGTH
EQUIPMENT WIDTH
20" TJI/H90
20" SSI 43L
( L / 240 , 1.5 in )
3
3
4
6
W=
H=
D=
B=
AVAILABLE MINIMUM TJI SIZES

30" TJI/L65
22" TJI/L90
AVAILABLE MINIMUM SSI SIZES
24" SSI 42MX
kips
ft
ft, double joist spacing
SEISMIC LOADS, (CBC 1632.2)

= MAX{ 0.39W , MIN[ 0.74W , 2.23W ]}
=
0.74 W , (SD)
=
0.53 W , (ASD) =
1.59
kips
FV = Fp / 3 =
0.53
wE = (0.5 FH H / B + 0.25 FV) / L =

where
133
plf / joist
at middle of span
Ca =
0.484
Ip =
1.15
ap =
Rp =
(CBC Tab 16A-O)
hx =
hr
ft
hr =
36
ft
GRAVITY LOADS
wR = 0.5(B + S) DL =
104
plf / joist, full span
wD = 0.25 W / D =
188
plf / joist, at middle of span
(CBC Tab 16A-O)
ANALYSIS
DESIGN EQUATIONS
M=
2
LD D 2
wR L
+ ( wD + wE )
+
8C D
4C D 8C D
( DL + E ) =
V =
w RL + ( w D + w E ) D
2C D
5w R L 4 ( w D + w E ) L 3D
+
384 EI
48 EI
JOIST PROPERTIES & ALLOWABLE MOMENT & SHEAR

2x No. 2, Douglas Fir-Larch ( ASD Supplements, Tab. 5.4a)
6
EI x 10
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
2
(in -lbs)
(CF included)
4
6
8
10
12
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
4130
8850
14200
21200
28500
630
990
1310
1670
2030
9
33
76
158
285
2x Structural, Douglas Fir-Larch (ASD Supplements, Tab. 5.4a)

6
EI x 10
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
2
(in -lbs)
(CF included)
4
1.00
6890
630
10
2.00
8
10
12
2.00
3.00
4.00
14700
990
40
23700
35300
47500
1310
1670
2030
91
188
338
V (lbs)
EI x 106
2
(in -lbs)
450
666
913
1205
1545
1934
2374
2868
3417
4025

Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
3.30
3.60
3.90
4.20
4.40
4.70
5.00
5.30
5.50
5.80
6750
8030
9210
10380
11540
12690
13830
14960
16085
17205
1925
2125
2330
2535
2740
2935
3060
2900
2900
2900
2x No. 1, Douglas Fir-Larch (from WoodBeam.xls)

Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
(CF included)
4
6
8
10
12
1.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
4594
9831
15769
23530
31641
630
990
1305
1665
2025
EI x 10
2
(in -lbs)
9
35
81
168
303
Where:
1.
ASD Supplements, Tab. 5.4a is from American Wood Council, 2001.
Assume that the joist top is fully lateral supported by diaphragm. (CL = 1.0)
2.
3.
WoodBeam.xls is at www.engineering-international.com

Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
3.10
3.30
3.60
3.90
4.10
4.40
4.70
5.00
5.20
5.50
5391
6570
7684
8800
9918
11038
12159
13279
14401
15524
2115
2330
2530
2735
2935
3135
3335
3540
3740
3940
EI x 106
2
(in -lbs)
460
667
900
1170
1478
1824
2211
2638
3106
3616
C x 106
2
(in -lbs)
9.39
10.99
12.50
14.02
15.55
17.08
18.62
20.15
21.68
23.21
(cont'd)
Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
4.20
4.50
4.70
5.00
5.30
5.60
5.80
6.10
6.40
6.60
9605
11430
13115
14785
16435
18075
19700
21315
22915
24510
TJI/H90 ( from Trusjoist # 1062, page 5)

Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
V (lbs)
4.60
4.90
5.20
5.40
5.70
6.00
6.30
6.50
6.80
7.10
1925
2125
2330
2535
2740
2935
3060
2900
2900
2900
V (lbs)
10960
13090
15065
17010
18945
20855
22755
24645
26520
28380
1925
2125
2330
2535
2740
2935
3060
2900
2900
2900
EI x 10
(in2-lbs)
621
913
1246
1635
2085
2597
3172
3814
4525
5306
EI x 106
(in2-lbs)
687
1015
1389
1827
2331
2904
3549
4266
5059
5930

Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
3.80
4.10
4.30
4.60
4.90
5.10
5.40
5.70
6.00
6.20
7592
9274
10863
12456
14051
15649
17248
18849
20450
22052
2060
2350
2620
2895
3165
3440
3710
3985
4255
4530
SSI 43L ( from ICC PFC-5803, page 5 & 6)

Deep (in)
Wt (lbs/ft)
M (ft-lbs)
V (lbs)
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
4.60
4.90
5.20
5.40
5.70
5.90
6.20
6.40
6.70
7.00
EI x 10
(in2-lbs)
637
924
1246
1617
2040
2514
3042
3622
4257
4948
C x 10
(in2-lbs)
9.54
11.15
12.68
14.22
15.77
17.32
18.87
20.42
21.97
23.53
C x 10
(in2-lbs)
6.81
7.91
8.97
10.05
11.13
12.21
13.30
14.39
15.47
16.56
EI x 10
(in2-lbs)
707
1031
1394
1944
2454
3026
3661
4358
5119
5944
9789
12081
14251
16269
18419
20573
22730
24889
27050
29212
2080
2260
2425
2590
2755
2920
3090
3255
3420
3585
V (lbs)
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
348.85
89.70
38.76
18.69
10.36
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
6.83
4.71
3.49
2.68
2.12
1.72
1.42
1.19
1.01
0.87
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
4.93
3.40
2.52
1.94
1.54
1.25
1.03
0.87
0.74
0.63
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
CHECK JOIST CAPACITIES & DEFLECTIONS


4
6
8
10
12
16581
16666
16666
16751
16835
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
348.85
95.14
41.31
19.87
11.02
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
V (lbs)
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
1665
1677
1677
1688
1699
313.97
78.49
34.50
16.70
9.29
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
V (lbs)
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
6.98
4.71
3.44
2.61
2.03
1.62
1.32
1.09
0.92
0.78
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
5.06
3.44
2.52
1.92
1.51
1.21
0.99
0.82
0.69
0.59
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
(DL+E)
(in)
CHECK
V (lbs)
1665
1677
1677
1688
1699

4
6
8
10
12
16581
16666
16666
16751
16835
1654
1654
1654
1654
1654
2x Structural, Douglas Fir-Larch

4
6
8
10
12
16581
16666
16666
16751
16835
TJI/L65
SSI 32MX

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
16776
16801
16827
16852
16869
16894
16920
16945
16962
16987
1691
1695
1698
1702
1704
1707
1711
1714
1716
1720
TJI/L90
16852
16877
16894
16920
16945
16970
16987
17013
17038
17055
V (lbs)
1702
1705
1707
1711
1714
1717
1720
1723
1726
1729
TJI/H90
16759
16776
16801
16827
16844
16869
16894
16920
16937
16962
1689
1691
1695
1698
1700
1704
1707
1711
1713
1716

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
16818
16844
16861
16886
16911
16928
16954
16979
17004
17021
V (lbs)
1697
1700
1703
1706
1709
1712
1715
1718
1722
1724
SSI 43L

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
V (lbs)
SSI 42MX

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
16886
16911
16937
16954
16979
17004
17030
17047
17072
17097
V (lbs)
1706
1709
1713
1715
1718
1722
1725
1727
1731
1734
4.57
3.09
2.26
1.72
1.35
1.08
0.88
0.74
0.62
0.53
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.

11 7/8
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
16886
16911
16937
16954
16979
16996
17021
17038
17064
17089
V (lbs)
1706
1709
1713
1715
1718
1721
1724
1726
1730
1733
4.44
3.05
2.25
1.62
1.28
1.04
0.86
0.72
0.61
0.53
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
o.k.
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wood Beam Design Base on NDS 2001

INPUT DATA
DL =
LL =
SELF =
TL =
PLL
=
40
lbs / ft
MEMBER SIZE =
6x8
40
lbs / ft
9
lbs / ft
MEMBER SPAN
=
8
ft
89
lbs / ft
2000 lbs (Non concurrent point live load, see IBC Tab 1607.1 or UBC Tab16-A)
Does member support plaster ? (See IBC Tab 1604.3 or UBC Tab 16-D)
(1= yes, 0= no)
1
Yes
0.90
1.00
1.15
Dead Load
Occupance Live Load
Snow Load
4
5
1.25
1.60
Construction Load
2.00
Impact Load
Choice
Wind/Earthquake Load
=>
V=
=
=
8.0
49
PLL
=
=
2000
2,196
CM
1.00
Ct
1.00
Ci
1.00
Cf
1.00
CV
1.00
Cc
1.00
Cr
1.00
lbs
lbs
<
1,089
psi
ok
2. Check Shear: 1.5 V/A < Fv

79 psi
<
213
psi
ok
lbs
4,392
0.03
in
<
in
0.04
in
0.04
in
0.27
4. Check Long-term Deflection:
5w(0.5dl +ll ) L 4 P ll L 3
+
=
384 EI
48EI
ll
ft-lbs
0.03
5wll L
P L
+ ll
384EI 48EI
CF
1.00
<= Case 2 Governs !
2,165
2000
=
3
CL
1.00
1. Check Bending: M/S < Fb

1,022 psi
3. Check Live Load Deflection:
(0.5dl +ll ) =
lbs/ft
wL 2 PllL
M=
+
8
4
ll =
ft
L
w
L
d w + Pll
2
CD
1.25
Construction Load
DESIGN SUMMARY
Camber =>0 in (1.5 DL deflection)
Code Designation
1
Select Structural, Douglas Fir-Larch
2
No. 1, Douglas Fir-Larch
3
Choice
=>
3
Does member have continuous lateral support ?
(1= yes, 0= no)
0
No
Condition
Duration Factor, CD
Code
1
2
3
<
L
360
in
( 0 .5 d l + l l )
ok
L
240
0.40
in
20.5
ft (case 1)
8.5
ft (case 2)
132.7
ft (case 1)
158.3
ft (case 2)
ANALYSIS
6 x 8 Properties
Maximum length permitted by:
b =
5.50
in
KbE =
d =
7.50
in
14.9
ft
0.439
A =
41.3
in2
RB =
6.661
< 50
S =
51.6
in3
E'y =
1300
ksi
I =
193
in4
FbE =
12861
psi
E = Ex =
1300
ksi
Fb =
Fb =
875
psi
Fv =
E' =
170
1,300
ksi
Fb ' =
1,089
psi
Fv' =
213
psi
Bending :
Shear
L=
L=
DL+LL
wtl
11.76
psi, (CH included to comply with NDS 97)
CASE 1:
8wtlS F b
2
+ 8wdl S F b Pll
L = P ll
wdl
1093.75 psi
F = FbE / Fb* =
L=
Governs
=>
2F V A
+ 2d
1.5wtl
2FV A
2P
+ 2 d ll
1.5wdl
wdl
CASE 2:
DL+PLL
ok
SUBDIAPHRAGM CHORD DESIGN

AXIAL LOAD
3.5
kips
THE ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE STRESS IS

Fc' = Fc CD CP CF =
754 psi
Where
Fc =
600
CD =
1.33
CF =
1.00
psi
(Lumber only)
CP = (1+F) / 2c - [(1+F) / 2c)2 - F / c]0.5

Fc* = Fc CD CF =
798
Le = Ke L = 1.0 L =
96
d =
7.5
in
SF = slenderness ratio =
FcE = KcE E / SF2 =
KcE =
F
0.944
psi
in
<
12.8
3317
50
[Satisfies NDS 2001 Sec. 3.7.1.4]
psi
0.418
= FcE / Fc* =
4.156
c =
0.8
THE ACTUAL COMPRESSIVE STRESS IS
fc = P / A =
85
psi
<
Fc '
THE ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRESS IS

Fb' =
1164 psi, [ for CD =
1.33
THE ACTUAL FLEXURAL STRESS IS

fb = (M + Pe) / S = 1277 psi
Fb'
>
[Satisfactory]
[Unsatisfactory]
CHECK COMBINED STRESS [NDS 2001 Sec. 3.9.2]

(fc / Fc' )2 + fb / [Fb' (1 - fc / FcE)]
1.138
<
4/3
[Satisfactory]
Hence the beam design is inadequate.
Note: This is straight beam. The top of the beam is continuously braced by the plywood sheathing and nonslenderness factor,
CL , adjustment is necessary for gravity load. For axial load , the only strong axis factor,
CP ,
should be consided.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wood Column Design

INPUT DATA
MEMBER TYPE:
1
2
3
DESIGN SUMMARY
POST
STUD
KING STUD
USE:
2 - 2'' x 6'' DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH No. 1
1. CHECK VERTICAL LOADS : fc < Fc' ?
GEOMETRY DATA:
HEIGHT
UNBRACED LENGTH
h
=
Le x-x (H) =
12.67
12.7
ft
ft
Le y-y (B) =
ft
364 psi
876 psi
3000
lbs
3000
lbs
6,000
lbs
55
plf
M=
1104
ft-lbs
V=
348
lbs
2
OCCUPANCY LIVE LOAD
x-x
LOAD DURATION
DESIGN CRITERIA:
SECTION
ok
599 psi
2. CHECK BENDING LOADS : fb < Fb' ?
LOAD DATA:
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
TOTAL
LATERAL LOAD
<
pcs, B =
2
in
H=
6
in
SPECIES
DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH
GRADE
No. 1
3
LUMBER GRADING TYPE
1
VISUALLY GRADED
SHAPE TYPE
1
SAWN LUMBER
WET / DRY USE ?
1
DRY
3. CHECK INTERACTION :
<
1300 psi
fc
F
1.848
'
c
ok
f bx
1
1 ?
'
1 f c F cEx F bx
>
NG
4. CHECK SHEAR LOADS : fv < Fv' ?

32 psi <
180 psi
5. DEFLECTION
4
2
= 5wh / (384EI) + 2.4wh / (Ebd) =
(
ok
4/8
h / 330
in
)
ANALYSIS
COLUMN BASIC DESIGN STRESSES:

COMPRESSIVE STRESS
MODULUS OF ELASTICITY
Fc =
E=
1500
1700
psi
ksi
BENDING STRESS (X-Axis)
Fbx =
1000
psi
BENDING STRESS (Y-Axis)
Fby =
1000
psi
Fv =
180
psi
5.50
1.50
16.5
15.13
41.59
4.13
27.6
0.0
in
in
2
in
in3
4
in
in3
SHEAR STRESS (X-Axis)

COLUMN PROPERTIES:
COLUMN SECTION
X-Dir
Y-Dir
dx =
dy =
A =
Abt. xx
Sx =
Ix =
Abt. yy
Sy =
Le x-x / dx =
Le y-y / dy =
AREA
SECTION MODULI
LENGTH-DEPTH RATIO
E'
Fbx'
Fby'
Fc'
Fv'
DURATION FACTOR
CD
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
MOISTURE FACTOR
CM
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
COLUMN PARAMETER
TEMPERATURE FACTOR
Ct
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
EULER BUCKLING COEFFICIENT
INCISING FACTOR
Ci
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
SIZE FACTOR
CF
1.30
1.30
1.10
FLAT USE FACTOR
Cfu
COLUMN STABILITY
CP
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS:
1.00
1.00
0.363
Cr
1.00
1.00
BEAM STABILITY
CL
1.00
1.00
0.80
KcE =
0.300
CRITICAL EULER BUCKLING VALUES
1.15
REPETITIVE MEMBER
c =
FcE =
667
psi
Fc* =
1650
psi
ADJUSTED PROPERTIES:
MODULUS OF ELASTICITY
E' =
1700
ksi
AXIAL STRESS
Fc' =
599
psi
BENDING STRESS (X-Axis)
Fbx' =
1300
psi
SHEAR STRESS
Fv' =
180
psi
BENDING STRESS (Y-Axis)
Fby' =
1495
psi
SHEAR STRESS
fv =
32
psi
ACTUAL STRESSES:
AXIAL STRESS
fc =
363.6
psi
BENDING STRESSES
fbx =
875.6
psi
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Shear Wall Design
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
INPUT DATA
LATERAL FORCE ON DIAPHRAGM: vdia, WIND =
350
plf,for wind
vdia, SEISMIC =
GRAVITY LOADS ON THE ROOF:
wDL =
wLL =
350
plf,for seismic
262
plf,for dead load
plf,for live load
DIMENSIONS:
Lw =
ft , h =
16
ft
L =
ft , hp =
ft
<= Sheathing and Single-Floor
PANEL GRADE ( 0 or 1)
MINIMUM NOMINAL PANEL THICKNESS
COMMON NAIL SIZE ( 0=6d, 1=8d, 2=10d )

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF FRAMING MEMBERS
EDGE STUD SECTION
pcs, b =
15/32
in
8d
262
0.5
2
in , h =
in
DESIGN SUMMARY
BLOCKED 15/32 SHEATHING WITH 8d COMMON NAILS
@ 4 in O.C. BOUNDARY & ALL EDGES / 12 in O.C. FIELD,
5/8 in DIA. x 10 in LONG ANCHOR BOLTS @ 34 in O.C.
HOLD-DOWN FORCES:
TL =
4.02 k ,
TR =
3.87 k
(USE PHD5-SDS3 SIMPSON HOLD-DOWN)
F = -0.35 k
DRAG STRUT FORCES:
EDGE STUD:
2 - 2'' x 6'' DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH No. 1, CONTINUOUS FULL HEIGHT.
=
SHEAR WALL DEFLECTION:
0.97 in
ANALYSIS
THE MAX SHEAR WALL DIMENSION RATIO
THE UNIT SHEAR FORCE
L/B =
vb =
306
2.0
plf,
THE SHEAR CAPACITIES PER UBCTable 23-II-I-1 :

Min.
Min.
Panel Grade
Common PenetrationThickness
Nail
(in)
(in)
Sheathing and Single-Floor
8d
1 1/2
15/32
<
Side Diaphragm Required, the Max. Nail Spacing =
[Satisfactory]
Blocked Nail Spacing

Boundary & All Edges
4
3
380
490
6
260
in )
2
640
Note: The indicated shear numbers have reduced by specific gravity factor per note 1 of the table.
WIND
350
205
40838
39200
Resisting
Moments (ft-lbs)
Safty
Factors
Net Uplift
(lbs)
Left
10515
0.9
TL =
3922
Right
12349
0.9
TR =
3716
Left
10515
2/3
TL =
4024
Right
12349
2/3
TR =
3871
0.971
) (Sec. 1633.2.6)
Holddown
SIMPSON
350
-S
DS
SEISMIC
Overturning
Moments (ft-lbs)
( 0
k
in
D5
THE HOLD-DOWN FORCES:

vdia
Wall Seismic
(plf)
at mid-story (lbs)
-0.35
34
PH
THE DRAG STRUT FORCE:

F = (L-Lw) MAX( vdia, WIND, 0vdia, SEISMIC ) =
THE MAX SPACING OF 5/8" DIA ANCHOR BOLT (Tab.11E, NDS 2001, Page 85)
S =
THE MAXIMUM SHEAR WALL DEFLECTION: ( Section 4.3, ASD MANUAL SUUP, Page SW-17)
= Be nding + Shear + Nail

Where:
vb =
A=
t=
slip
306
16.50
0.298
+ Chord
splice slip
plf
in2
in
8v b h 3 v bh
hd
+
+ 0.75he n + a
EAL w Gt
Lw
Lw =
h =
en =
8
16
0.037
ft
ft
in
in
E = 1.7E+06 psi
G = 9.0E+04 psi
da =
0.15 in
CHECK EDGE STUD CAPACITY

Fc =
E=
1500
1700
psi
ksi
CD =
CF =
1.6
CP =
0.14
1.10
'
365
Fc =
A=
psi
>
[Satisfactory]
1. "National Design Specification, NDS", 2001 Edition, AF&AP, AWC, 2001.
16.5
fc =
in2
201
psi
Daniel
T. Li
Diaphragm Design
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
INPUT DATA
wL, WIND =
wL, SEISMIC =
LATERAL FORCE ALONG B SIDE:
wB, WIND =
wB, SEISMIC =
256
plf,for wind
224
plf,for seismic
256
plf,for wind
343
plf,for seismic
DIMENSIONS:
LATERAL FORCE ALONG L SIDE:
L=
240
ft , B =
110
ft
B1 =
45
ft , B2 =
40
ft
MINIMUM NOMINAL FRAMING WITH ( 2 or 3) =

=

in
15/32
in
8d
0.43
DESIGN SUMMARY
A1:
(2) - 16 ft x 110 ft
@ 4 in O.C. BOUNDARY / 6 in O.C. EDGES / 12"O.C. FIELD.
A2:
(2) - 14 ft x 110 ft
@ 6" O.C. BOUNDARY & EDGES / 12"O.CFIELD.
A3:
(1) - 180.00 ft x 110 ft

UNBLOCKED 15/32 SHEATHING WITH 8d COMMON NAILS
@ 6" O.C. ALL EDGES / 12"O.CFIELD.
THE CHORD FORCES:
TL = CL = 16.76
THE DRAG STRUT FORCES:
F1 =
6.84
THE MAXIMUM DIAPHRAGM DEFLECTION:
k ,
k ,
TB = C B =
F2 =
=
2.16
27.37
3.09
k
k
in
ANALYSIS
THE DIAPHRAGM IS CONSIDED FLEXIBLE IF ITS MAXIMUM LATERAL DEFORMATION IS MORE THAN TWO TIMES THE AVERAGE SHEAR
WALL DEFLECTION OF THE ASSOCIATED STORY. WITHOUT FURTHER CALCULATIONS, ASSUME A FLEXIBLE DIAPHRAGM HERE.
FROM THE TABLE 3.1 IN ASD MANUAL SUPP, PAGE SP-12, THE PANEL BENDING STRENGTH CAPACITY IS 355 in-lbs/ft, THAT IS THE
DIAPHRAGM CAN RESISTS 59 psf GRAVITY LOADS (DL+LL) AT 2'-0" o.c. SPACING SUPPORTS.
L/B =
2.2
< 3, [satisfactory]
THE MAX SHEAR FORCE ALONG B SIDE
THE MAX DIAPHTAGM DIMENSION RATIO
vL =
279
plf, ( Boundary Spacing =
THE MAX SHEAR FORCE ALONG L SIDE
vB =
79
plf, ( Required Boundary/Edges Nail Spacing for Case 3 =
in, Edges ReqD =
THE ALLOWABLE SHEAR FORCE FOR CASE 1 @ 6 in NAIL SPACING
v1 =
246
plf, L1 =
105.7
ft
THE MAX ALLOWABLE UNBLOCKED SHEAR FORCE FOR CASE 1
v1 =
217
plf, L2 =
93.4
ft
THE SHEAR CAPACITIES PER UBC Table 23-II-H :

Min.
Min.
Member
Panel Grade
Common PenetrationThickness Width
Nail
(in)
(in)
(in)
8d
1 1/2
15/32
3
6/6
246

Boundary / Other Edges
4/6
2.5 / 4
328
492
in )
in )
Unblocked
2/3
554
Case 1
217
Others
164
THE CHORD FORCES:
TL = CL = ( wLL2 ) / ( 8B ) =
THE DRAG STRUT FORCES:
16.76
TB = CB = ( wBB2 ) / ( 8L ) =
F1 = 0.5 (B-2B1) MAX( v1, WIND, 0v1, SEISMIC ) =
6.84
F2 = B2 MAX( v1, WIND, 0v1, SEISMIC ) =
27.37
2.16
0 = 2.8
(UBC 1633.2.6,
or IBC 1620.1.6)
THE MAXIMUM DIAPHRAGM DEFLECTION: ( Section 3.3, ASD MANUAL SUUP, Page SW-12)
= Bending + Shear + Nail

Where:
Note:
slip
+ Chord
splice slip
5v L L 3 v LL
+
+ 0.188 Le n +
8 EAB 4 Gt
( DCx )
2B
3.092
in
vL =
279
plf
L=
240
ft
E = 1.7E+06 psi
2
A = 21.75 in
B=
110
ft
G = 9.0E+04 psi,(UBC97 Page3-421)
t = 0.298 in,(UBC97 Page3-420)
en = 0.037 in,(UBC97 Page3-422) (Dcx) = 45.00 in
The deflection, , above is based on completely blocked. For unblocked diaphragm, 2.4 should be used.
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Subdiaphragm Design Based on IBC 2000
INPUT DATA
Roof Height
L=
B=
hr =
60
46
28
ft
ft
ft
Parapet Height
hP =
ft
Length
Width
Wall Weight
WP =
112
Coefficient
SDS =
0.54
Iw =
Importance Factor
vallowable =
Diaphragm Shear Capacity
psf
1
720
plf
ANALYSIS
The subdiaphragms comply with 2.5:1 of max. length-to-width rario. (Sec.1620.2.1,IBC 2000)
The wall anchor force is given by IBC Sec. 1620.1.7, 1620.2.1 & 1604.8.2 as
F P = MAX 0.8S DS I EW p
Where :
Fmin
( hr + h p )
2h r
, 400 S DS I E , F min =
885 plf
plf
200
(IBC Sec.1604.8.2)
Note: the cofficient in Eq 16-64 was revised from 1.2 to 0.8 as a result of voting during the 2001 public
hearing on the 2000 IBC.
Wood subdiaphragm shear :

v=
0.5 F PL
1.4 B
412
plf, for ASD
vallowable
<
Satisfactory to use diaphragm nailing for subdiaphragm.
Chord force :
T = C = F PL
8B
8.66
k, (Indicated force has NOT been reduced for ASD)
Reaction force :
R=
F PL
2
26.54 k
(Indicated force has NOT been reduced for ASD)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Subdiaphragm Design Based on UBC 97

INPUT DATA
Length
Width
Roof Height
L=
B=
hr =
60
46
28
ft
ft
ft
ft
hP =
WP =
112
Ca =
Coefficient
Seismic Zone (2A, 2B, 3, 4)
IP =
Importance Factor
vallowable =
Diaphragm Capacity
0.44
4
1
Parapet Height
Wall Weight
720
psf
plf (ASD)
ANALYSIS
Rp
=
3
ap
=
1.5
The subdiaphragms comply with 2.5:1 max. length-to-width rario. (Sec.1633.2.9,UBC 97)
Fp=
a pC a I p
4a C I pw p
h
1+ 3 x wp = p a
=
hr
Rp
Rp
99
psf
Check minimum wall-roof anchorage force : (Sec.1633.2.8.1 & 1611.4, UBC97)

w= F
( h r +h p )
2h r
Thus, w
1802
plf
1802
plf
>
420
plf
Wood subdiaphragm shear : (Sec.1633.2.8.1 item 5, UBC97)

0.5wL
, for zone 3 or 4
1.4 B
=
714
plf, for ASD
v=
0.5wL
<
720
plf
, for zone 1 or 2
1.4 B
Use diaphragm nailing for subdiaphragm is adequate.
0.85
Chord force :
T =C=
wL 2
8B
Steel tie/reaction force :

R=
1.4
wL
,
2
wL
,
2
17.63
kips, (for SD)
12.59
kips, (for ASD)
(Sec.1633.2.8.1 item 4, UBC97)
for zone 3 or 4
for zone 1 or 2
75.69
kips, (SD) =
54.07 kips, (for ASD)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Top Plate Connection
DIAPHRAGM CHORD FORCE RESISTED BY THE TOP PLATE

T=C=
NAIL TYPE ( 0=Common Wire, 1=Box, 2=Sinker )
NAIL PENNY-WEIGHT ( 12d, 16d, 20d )
LUMBER TYPE
( 0=Douglas Fir-Larch, 1=Douglas Fir-Larch(N),
2=Hem-Fir(N), 3=Hem-Fir, 4=Spruce-Pine-Fir)
LUMBER GRADE ( 0=Select Structural, 1=No.1 & Btr, 2=No.1, 3=No.2,
4=No.3, 5=Stud, 6=Construction, 7=Standard, 8=Utility)
TOP PLATE SIZE
Double
2
x
LOAD DURATION FACTOR ( Tab 2.3.2, NDS 2001, Page 9 )
CD =
WET SERVICE FACTOR ( Tab 10.3.3, NDS 2001, Page 59 )
TEMPERATURE FACTOR ( Tab 10.3.4, NDS 2001, Page 59 )
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
CM =
Ct =
15
0
16d
0
k
Common Wire Nail
Douglas Fir-Larch, G=0.5
No.1
No.1, Douglas Fir-Larch, G=0.5
1.6
1.0
1.0
Use CMSTC16 with 32-16d sinkers, Each Side.
ANALYSIS
DESIGN VALUE FOR TENSION (Tab 4A, NDS 2001 SUPP, Page 31)
AREA OF CROSS SECTION FOR ONE 2 x 6 MEMBER
SIZE FACTOR (Tab 4A, NDS 2001 SUPP, Page 30)
ALLOWABLE TENSION CAPACITY FOR ONE 2 x 6 ONLY
Ft =
675
psi
2
A =
8.25 in
CF =
1.30
T' = AFtCDCMCtCF =
L =
ts =
THE PENETRATION OF THE NAIL INTO THE MAIN MEMBER
p =
NAIL DIAMETER
D =
THE PENETRATION FACTOR (Note 3, Tab 11N, NDS 2001, Page 97) Cd =
NAIL LENGTH
SIDE MEMBER THICKNESS
in
in
1.99
in
0.162 in
11.58
< T, SIMPSON STRAP REQUIRED.
3 1/2
1 1/2
1.00
THE NOMINAL DESIGN VALUE FOR SINGLE SHEAR IS TABULATED IN NDS 2001 TABLE 11N, PAGE 97, AS
Z =
141
lbf
THE ALLOWABLE LATERAL DESIGN VALUE FOR THE ONE NAIL IS
Z' =
ZCDCMCtCd
n =
T / Z'
=
THE NUMBER OF NAILS REQUIRED IS
THE MIN. FORCE RESISTED BY THE SIMPSON STRAP
T - T' =
3.42
Use CMSTC16 with 32-16d sinkers, Each Side.
226
66.5
lbf
67
Nails
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Bolt Connection Design Based on NDS 2001

AXIAL TENSILE FORCE (ASD)

NUMBER OF BOLTS
BOLT DIAMETER
BOLT SPACING
T=
n=
=
S=
5.3
3
3/4
3
END DISTANCE OF WOOD
En =
in
END DISTANCE OF STEEL
En,s =
1.5
in
LUMBER TYPE

LUMBER SIZE
(
2
)
2
STRAP SIZE
5
0
thk. x
width x
CD =
CM =
6
1/4
1.6
1.0
Ct =
1.0
in

width
thk.
THE CONNECTION DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
11.8
ANALYSIS
CHECK STEEL STRAP CAPACITIES (AISC-ASD)
2
Ag =
1.25 in , yielding critierion
Tallow =
0.6 Fy Ag =
An =
1.03
Tallow =
27.00
1.33
>
29.91
>
>
Fu =
ksi
58.00
ksi
[Satisfactory]
in2, block shear
Tallow =
0.3 Fu Av + 0.5 Fu (0.5 An) =
38.06
rmin =
t / (12)0.5 =
in
L / rmin =
36.00
[Satisfactory]
in2, fracture critierion
0.5 Fu An =
Av =
Fy =
k
0.072
55
300
<
[Satisfactory]
L=
Max (En , S ) =
[Satisfactory]
in
(AISC-ASD, D2, page 5-40)
CHECK EDGE, END, & SPACING DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS (NDS 2001, Table 11.5.1A, Table 11.5.1B, & Table 11.5.1C)
Eg =
2.75
in
>
1.5 D
[Satisfactory]
En =
in
>
3.5 D
[Satisfactory]
S=
in
>
3D
[Satisfactory]
CHECK WOOD CAPACITY

C = Min (C1 , C2 , C3) =
where
Cg =
where
0.762
1.000
C3 = (actual spacing) / (min spacing for full design value) = S / 4D =
1.000
n=
E mA m =
=
m 1 m 2 n
n 1+ R EA m n (1+m ) 1+m 2 n
tm =
where
, (geometry factor, NDS 2001, 11.5.1, page 76)
C2 = (actual shear area) / (min shear area for full design value) =
Es As =
Z'II
0.762
C1 = (actual end distance) / (min end distance for full design value) = En / 7D =
0.988
= 180000 D1.5 =
3.8E+07 lbs, (NDS 2001, Table 10.3.6C)

3
116913
u = 1+ S/2 [1 / EmAm + 1 / EsAs] =
in
m = u - (u2 - 1)0.5 = 0.855
2.3E+07 lbs, (NDS 2001, Table 10.3.6C)
1470
, (group action factor, NDS 2001, 10.3.6, page 60)
REA = Min [(EsAs/EmAm) , (EmAm/EsAs)] =
n ZII CD CM Ct Cg C =
ZII =
1+ R EA
1 m
5.309
kips
>
[Satisfactory]
lbs / bolt, (interpolated from NDS 2001, Table 11B, Page 82)
1.012
0.616
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Nailer Connection Design Based on NDS 2001

AXIAL TENSILE FORCE (ASD)

NUMBER OF STUDS
THREAD STUD DIAMETER
THREAD STUD SPACING
T=
n=
=
S=
END DISTANCE OF WOOD
En =
NAILER TYPE

4
NAILER SIZE
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
thk.
8
6
3/4
12
in
in
width
in2
SECTION AREA OF STEEL MEMBER
As =
11.8

CD =
CM =
1.6
1.0
Ct =
1.0
GROUP ACTION FACTOR APPLY? ( 0 = No, 1 = Yes)
Yes, ( Cg =
0.719
, NDS 2001, 10.3.6)
(If T is drag/collector force or stud spacing less than 12" o.c., the group action factor Cg must apply.)
ANALYSIS
CHECK EDGE, END, & SPACING DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS (NDS 2001, Table 11.5.1A, Table 11.5.1B, & Table 11.5.1C)
Eg =
2.75
in
>
1.5 D
[Satisfactory]
En =
in
>
3.5 D
[Satisfactory]
S=
12
in
>
3D
[Satisfactory]
CHECK WOOD CAPACITY

C = Min (C1 , C2 , C3) =
where
Cg =
where
1.000
4.000
m 1 m 2 n
n 1+ R EA m n (1+m ) 1+m 2 n
n=
EmA m =
where
0.762
C3 = (actual spacing) / (min spacing for full design value) = S / 4D =
E sA s =
, (geometry factor, NDS 2001, 11.5.1, page 76)
C2 = (actual shear area) / (min shear area for full design value) =
tm =
Z'II
0.762
C1 = (actual end distance) / (min end distance for full design value) = En / 7D =
0.719
= 180000 D
3.4E+08 lbs
3.5
1.5
116913
u = 1+ S/2 [1 / EmAm + 1 / EsAs] =
in
2
0.5
m = u - (u - 1) = 0.789
2.7E+07 lbs, (Em fr NDS, Tab.10.3.6C)
1640
, (group action factor, NDS 2001, 10.3.6, page 60)
REA = Min [(EsAs/EmAm) , (EmAm/EsAs)] =
n ZII CD CM Ct Cg C =
ZII =
1+ R EA
1 m
8.629
kips
>
[Satisfactory]
lbs / stud, (interpolated from NDS 2001, Table 11E, Page 85)
1.028
0.079
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Wood Shear Wall with an Opening

INPUT DATA
vdia, WIND =
vdia, SEISMIC =
LATERAL FORCE ON DIAPHRAGM:

(SERVICE LOADS)
DIMENSIONS:
268
plf,for wind
350
plf,for seismic
L1 =
ft , L2 =
16
ft , L3 =
ft
H1 =
ft , H2 =
ft , H3 =
6.5
ft
KING STUD SECTION
pcs, b =
in , h =
in
EDGE STUD SECTION
pcs, b =
in , h =
in

15/32
in
8d
0.5
DESIGN SUMMARY
BLOCKED 15/32 SHEATHING, EACH SIDE, WITH 8d COMMON NAILS
@ 2 in O.C. BOUNDARY & ALL EDGES / 12 in O.C. FIELD,
5/8 in DIA. x 10 in LONG ANCHOR BOLTS @ 48 in O.C.
HOLD-DOWN FORCES:
TL =
5.99
k ,
TR = 5.99 k
(USE HDQ8-SDS3 SIMPSON HOLD-DOWN)
F=
MAX STRAP FORCE:
4.68
k
(USE SIMPSON CMSTC16 OVER WALL SHEATHING WITH FLAT BLOCKING)
KING STUD:
EDGE STUD:
=
SHEAR WALL DEFLECTION:
1.58
in
cont'd
ANALYSIS
CHECK MAX SHEAR WALL DIMENSION RATIO
h/w =
1.5
<
[Satisfactory]
THE FORCES OF FREE-BODY INDIVIDUAL PANELS OF WALL ARE GIVEN BY FIGURE ABOVE AND TABLES AS
INDIVIDUAL PANEL
W (ft)
H (ft)
MAX SHEAR STRESS (plf)
NO.
FORCE (lbf)
NO.
FORCE (lbf)
4.00
6.50
27
F1
108
F13
3325
8.00
6.50
512
F2
4092
F14
3325
8.00
6.50
512
F3
108
F15
6475
4.00
6.50
27
F4
3325
F16
3150
4.00
3.00
1050
F5
4200
F17
3150
4.00
3.00
1050
F6
4092
F18
6475
4.00
3.00
1050
F7
4092
F19
4682
4.00
3.00
1050
F8
4200
F20
4682
4.00
4.00
-121
F9
175
F21
2668
10
8.00
4.00
667
F10
3150
F22
-482
11
8.00
4.00
667
F11
3150
F23
4682
12
4.00
4.00
-121
F12
175
F24
-482
THE UNIT SHEAR FORCE
vb =
1050
plf,
THE SHEAR CAPACITIES PER UBC Table 23-II-I-1 :

Min.
Min.
Panel Grade
Common Penetration Thickness
Nail
(in)
(in)
8d
1 1/2
15/32
6
260
Sides Diaphragm Required, the Max. Nail Spacing =

Boundary & All Edges
4
3
380
490
in )
2
640
350
WIND
268
634
143827
106128
Resisting
Moments (ft-lbs)
in
Safty
Factors
Net Uplift
(lbs)
Left
0.9
TL =
Right
0.9
TR =
5993
Left
2/3
TL =
4422
Right
2/3
TR =
4422
1.581
Holddown
SIMPSON
5993
SEISMIC
Overturning
Moments (ft-lbs)
48
8SD
S
THE HOLD-DOWN FORCES:

Wall Seismic
vdia
at mid-story (lbs)
(plf)
S =
HD
Q
THE MAX SPACING OF 5/8" DIA ANCHOR BOLT (Tab.11E, NDS 2001, Page 85)
THE MAXIMUM SHEAR WALL DEFLECTION: ( Section 4.3, ASD MANUAL SUUP, Page SW-17)
= Be nding + Shear + Nail

Where:
vb =
A=
t=
slip
1050
16.50
0.298
+ C hord
splice slip
plf
in2
in
8v b h 3 v bh
hd a
+
+ 0.75he n +
EAL w Gt
Lw
Lw =
h =
en =
8
17
0.037
ft
ft
in
in
E = 1.7E+06 psi
G = 9.0E+04 psi
da =
0.15
in
CHECK KING STUD CAPACITY

Fc =
1500
psi
CD =
1.6
CP =
0.13
E=
1700
ksi
CF =
1.10
Fc' =
344
A=
psi
>
16.5
in2
fc =
191
psi
311
psi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK EDGE STUD CAPACITY
Fc =
1500
psi
CD =
1.6
CP =
0.13
E=
1700
ksi
CF =
1.10
Fc' =
344
A=
psi
>
19.25
fc =
[Satisfactory]
3. "2000 IBC Structuiral/Seismic Design Manual - Volume 1, Code Application Examples", Structural Engineers
Association of California, 2001.
in2
Daniel
T. Li
Toe-Nail Connection
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

NAIL TYPE ( 0=Common Wire, 1=Box, 2=Sinker )
NAIL PENNY-WEIGHT ( 6d, 7d, 8d, 10d, 12d, 16d, 20d, 30d, 40d, 50d, 60d )
LUMBER SPECIES ( 0=Douglas Fir-Larch, 1=Douglas Fir-Larch(N),
CD =
0
10d
0
CM =
Ct =
1.0

THE ALLOWABLE LATERAL DESIGN VALUE FOR THE TOE-NAIL
Common Wire Nail

1.6
1.0
lbf
157
ANALYSIS
TOE-NAIL FACTOR ( Sec 11.5.4, NDS 2001, Page 78 )
NAIL LENGTH
THE SIDE MEMBER THICKNESS IS TAKEN TO BE EQUAL TO
THE PENETRATION OF THE NAIL INTO THE MAIN MEMBER
NAIL DIAMETER
THE PENETRATION FACTOR (Note 3, Tab 11N, NDS 2001, Page 97)
Ctn =
0.83
L =
3
in
ts = L / 3 =
1
p = L(cos30o) -ts =
D =
0.148 in
Cd =
1.00
in
1.60
in
THE NOMINAL DESIGN VALUE FOR SINGLE SHEAR IS TABULATED IN NDS 2001 TABLE 11N, PAGE 97, AS
Z =
118
lbf
THE ALLOWABLE LATERAL DESIGN VALUE FOR THE TOE-NAIL IS
Z' =
ZCDCMCtCdCtn
Typical Nail Dimensions (Appendix L, NDS 2001, Page 168)

Penny-Weight
Type
6d
7d
8d
10d
12d
16d
20d
10
Length
Common Diameter
Head
Box
Sinker
6
2
2 1/4
2 1/2
10
3
12
16
3 1/4
3 1/2
20
4
157
30d
40d
50d
30
40
50
4 1/2
lbf
5 1/2
60d
60
6
0.113
0.113
0.131
0.148
0.148
0.162
0.192
0.207
0.225
0.244
0.263
0.266
0.266
0.281
0.312
0.312
0.344
0.406
0.438
0.469
0.500
0.531
Length
2 1/4
2 1/2
3 1/4
3 1/2
4 1/2
Diameter
0.099
0.099
0.113
0.128
0.128
0.135
0.148
0.148
0.162
0.406
Head
0.266
0.266
0.297
0.312
0.312
0.344
0.375
0.375
Length
1 7/8
8 1/8
2 3/8
2 7/8
3 1/8
3 1/4
3 3/4
4 1/4
4 3/4
5 3/4
Diameter
0.092
0.099
0.113
0.120
0.135
0.148
0.177
0.192
0.207
0.244
Head
0.234
0.250
0.266
0.281
0.312
0.344
0.375
0.406
0.438
0.500
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Connection from Diaphragm, Ledger to CMU Wall
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
INPUT DATA
GRAVITY LOAD
D+L =
250
plf
420
plf
SERVICE ANCHORAGE FORCE
Fanch =
SERVICE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR FORCE
V=
640
plf
LEDGER SPECIES ( 0=Douglas Fir-Larch, 1=Douglas Fir-Larch(N),
0
LEDGER GRADE
2
No.1
( 0=Select Structural, 1=No.1 & Btr, 2=No.1, 3=No.2,
4=No.3, 5=Stud, 6=Construction, 7=Standard, 8=Utility)
LEDGER SIZE
4
x
8
( No.1, Douglas Fir-Larch, G=0.5 )
=
ANCHOR BOLT DIAMETER
3/4
in
WET SERVICE FACTOR ( Tab 10.3.3, NDS 2001, Page 59 ) CM =
1.0
TEMPERATURE FACTOR ( Tab 10.3.4, NDS 2001, Page 59 )Ct =
1.0
PURLIN ANCHORS SPACING
S=
36
in
1
CMU
THICKNESS OF WALL
t=
8
in
0
No
MASONRY STRENGTH
fM' =
1.5
ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS
fy =
60
ksi
WALL HORIZ. REINF.
1
#
5
@
16
in. o. c.
DESIGN SUMMARY
4 x 8 LEDGER with 3/4 in DIA. A.B.'s @ 36 in o.c.
SIMPSON PLURLIN ANCHOR PAI23 w/ 9-10d x 1 1/2 Nails @ 36 in o.c.
ANALYSIS
THE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR TRANSFERS INTO THE TOP OF THE LEDGER BY NAILS THOUGH PLY WOOD AND THE LEDGER BOLTS WOULD
RESIST BOTH THE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR BY PARALLEL TO GRAIN BEARING AND THE GRAVITY LOAD BY PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN
BEARING. LATER FORCES IN THE OTHER DIRECTION WOULD BE RESIST BY SIMPSON PLURLIN ANCHORS.
CHECK LEDGER CAPACITY
(CD)Lat =
1.6
(for wind/seismic loads)
(CD)D+L =
1.0
(for gravity loads)
GROUP ACTION FACTOR (Sec 10.3.6, NDS 2001, Page 60)
Cg =
1.0
C =
1.0
( All dimensions conform to the specified minimums.)
GEOMETRY FACTOR ( Sec 11.5.1, NDS 2001, Page 76 )
DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (Tab 11E, NDS 2001, Page 85)
Z =
880
DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PARALLEL TO GRAIN (Tab 11E, NDS 2001, Page 85)
Z =
1640
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN
Z ' = Z (CD)D+LCMCtCgC
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PARALLEL TO GRAIN
Z ' = Z (CD)LATCMCtCgC
=
=
lbf
lbf
880
lbf
2624
lbf
THE ANGLE BETWEEN DIRECTION OF COMBINED LOAD AND DIRECTION OF GRAIN =

21.34
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING AT THE ANGLE TO GRAIN Z ' = Z 'Z ' /(Z 'cos2+Z||'sin2) =
2079
THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BOLT SPACING SHALL BE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS :
S 1 = MIN
'
Z ,
D+L
'
( D+ L)
+V 2
36.30
in
( Use 36 in )
Fv =
Fv ' =
BASIC DESIGN VALUE FOR SHEAR (Tab 4A, NDS 2001 SUPP, Page 31)
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR SHEAR
DEPTH FROM THE UNLOADED EDGE OF THE LEDGER TO THE CENTER OF THE BOLT de
180
psi
Fv(CD)D+LCMCt =
3.63
180
in
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN SHEAR IS GIVEN BY NDS 2001 Eq. 3.4-6, Page 17, AS
'
V =
2 '
de
F v bd
d
3
761
lbf
>
(D+L)S
756
lbf
[Satisfactory]
psi
lbf
DESIGN PURLIN ANCHORS

SELECT SIMPSON PAI23 w/ 9-10d x 1 1/2 Nails @ 36 in o.c.
DESIGN FORCE FOR STEEL ANCHOR (UBC 1633.2.8.1, IBC 2003 1620.2) :
<
1880 lbf, allowable
1.4FanchS = 1764 lbf
DESIGN FORCE FOR WOOD MEMBER (UBC97SEC. 1633.2.8.1, ITEM 5) :
0.85FanchS = 1071 lbf
<
1128 lbf, allowable
cont'd
[Satisfactory]
CHECK WALL CAPACITY TO SPAN LATERALLY S SPACING

ALLOWABLE MASONRY STRESS FACTOR :
Allowable reinf. stress
Fs
=
=
Allowable stress
Fb=(SF)(0.33fm')
Masonry elasticity modulus
Em
=
=
Steel elasticity modulus
Es
Effective width
bw
=
The tensile stress in reinforcement is
SF
32000
330
1350
29000
12
F S
f s = anch =
8 A s jd
6938
psi
<
Fs
[Satisfactory]
=
psi
psi
ksi
ksi
in
0.667
Modular ratio
n
=
Wall reinf. area
As
=
Tension reinf. ratio
=
The neutral axis depth factor
k
=
The lever-arm factor
j
=
The compressive stress in the extreme fiber is
fb=
21.48
0.23
0.005
0.36
0.88
F anch S =
2
4b w jk d
185
psi
<
Fb
[Satisfactory]
in / ft
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Connection from Diaphragm, Ledger to CMU Wall
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
INPUT DATA
GRAVITY LOAD
D+L =
250
plf
SERVICE ANCHORAGE FORCE
Fanch =
420
plf
V=
640
plf
SERVICE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR FORCE
LEDGER SPECIES ( 0=Southern Pine with 2"-4" Wide,

1=Southern Pine with 5"-6" Wide)
Southern Pine
LEDGER GRADE
Non-Dense Select Structural
( 0=Dense Select Structural, 1=Select Structural, 2=Non-Dense Select Structural, 3=No.1 Dense,
4=No.1, 5=No.1 Non-Dense, 6=No.2 Dense, 7=No.2, 8=No.2 Non-Dense)
LEDGER SIZE
10
( Non-Dense Select Structural, Southern Pine )

=
ANCHOR BOLT DIAMETER
3/4
in
WET SERVICE FACTOR ( Tab 10.3.3, NDS 2001, Page 59 ) CM =
TEMPERATURE FACTOR ( Tab 10.3.4, NDS 2001, Page 59 )Ct =
PURLIN ANCHORS SPACING
S=
36
1
CMU
t=
in
0
1.5
No
ksi
60
5
ksi

THICKNESS OF WALL
MASONRY STRENGTH
REBAR YIELD STRESS
WALL HORIZ. REINF.
fM' =
fy =
#
1.0
1.0
in
16
in. o. c.
DESIGN SUMMARY
4 x 10 LEDGER with 3/4 in DIA. A.B.'s @ 37 in o.c.
SIMPSON PLURLIN ANCHOR PAI23 w/ 9-10d x 1 1/2 Nails @ 36 in o.c.
ANALYSIS
THE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR TRANSFERS INTO THE TOP OF THE LEDGER BY NAILS THOUGH PLY WOOD AND THE LEDGER BOLTS WOULD
RESIST BOTH THE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR BY PARALLEL TO GRAIN BEARING AND THE GRAVITY LOAD BY PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN
BEARING. LATER FORCES IN THE OTHER DIRECTION WOULD BE RESIST BY SIMPSON PLURLIN ANCHORS.
CHECK LEDGER CAPACITY
(CD)Lat =
(CD)D+L =
1.6
1.0
(for wind/seismic loads)

(for gravity loads)
Cg =
C =
1.0
1.0
( All dimensions conform to the specified minimums.)
GROUP ACTION FACTOR (Sec 10.3.6, NDS 2001, Page 60)

GEOMETRY FACTOR ( Sec 11.5.1, NDS 2001, Page 76 )
DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (Tab 11E, NDS 2001, Page 85)
Z =
950
DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PARALLEL TO GRAIN (Tab 11E, NDS 2001, Page 85)
Z =
1680
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN
Z ' = Z (CD)D+LCMCtCgC
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING PARALLEL TO GRAIN
Z ' = Z (CD)LATCMCtCgC
=
=
lbf
lbf
950
lbf
2688
lbf
=
THE ANGLE BETWEEN DIRECTION OF COMBINED LOAD AND DIRECTION OF GRAIN
21.34
2
2
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR THE BOLT BEARING AT THE ANGLE TO GRAIN Z ' = Z 'Z ' /(Z 'cos +Z||'sin ) =
2164
lbf
THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BOLT SPACING SHALL BE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS :
S 1 = MIN
'
Z ,
D+L
'
( D+ L)
+V 2
in
37.79
( Use 37 in )
BASIC DESIGN VALUE FOR SHEAR (Tab 4B, NDS 2001 SUPP, Page 37)
Fv =
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE FOR SHEAR
Fv' =
DEPTH FROM THE UNLOADED EDGE OF THE LEDGER TO THE CENTER OF THE BOLT de
175
psi
Fv(CD)D+LCMCt =
4.63
175
psi
in
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN SHEAR IS GIVEN BY NDS 2001 Eq. 3.4-6, Page 17, AS
'
V =
2 '
de
F v bd
d
3
944
lbf
>
(D+L)S
787
lbf
[Satisfactory]
DESIGN PURLIN ANCHORS

SELECT SIMPSON PAI23 w/ 9-10d x 1 1/2 Nails @ 36 in o.c.
DESIGN FORCE FOR STEEL ANCHOR (UBC97,SEC 1633.2.8.1, ITEM 4) :
1.4FanchS =
1764
lbf
<
1880
lbf, allowable
DESIGN FORCE FOR WOOD MEMBER (UBC97SEC. 1633.2.8.1, ITEM 5) :
0.85FanchS =
1071
lbf
<
1128
[Satisfactory]
lbf, allowable
CHECK WALL CAPACITY TO SPAN LATERALLY S SPACING

ALLOWABLE MASONRY STRESS FACTOR :
Allowable reinf. stress
Allowable stress
SF
0.667
Fs
32000
psi
Modular ratio
Fb=(SF)(0.33fm')
=
=
330
1350
psi
ksi
Wall reinf. area

Tension reinf. ratio
29000
ksi
The neutral axis depth factor
12
in
Masonry elasticity modulus

Steel elasticity modulus
Em
Es
Effective width
bw
The tensile stress in reinforcement is

2
F S
f s = anch =
8 A s jd
cont'd
=
6938
psi
<
Fs
[Satisfactory]
21.48
As
=
=
0.23
0.005
0.36
The lever-arm factor

j
=
The compressive stress in the extreme fiber is
0.88
fb=
F anch S =
2
4b w jk d
185
psi
<
Fb
[Satisfactory]
in / ft
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator

INPUT DATA
TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD)
Fp =
15.16
n=
NUMBER OF SEGMENTS
kips
Segment
Length, ft
17.5
22.67
13.83
35.5
10
Shear Wall ?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
ANALYSIS
TOTAL DRAG LENGTH
Ldrag =
99.5
ft
TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH
Lwall =
41.33
ft
vdiaphragm = Fp / vdrag =
152
plf
vshear wall = Fp / vwall =
367
plf
Drag Axial Force, kips
DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS

SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS
Section Point
Distance, ft
17.5
40.17
54
89.5
99.5
Axial Force
3.75
0.30
3.26
-2.14
0.00
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
Distance, ft
DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM
SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
Joist Design Based on AISI 2001 & ICBO ER-4943P

SECTION & SPACING
600S162-54
24
in o.c
( 50 ksi )
JOIST SPAN
L=
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
DL =
LL =
20
20
psf
psf
LATERAL SUPPORTED ?
(0=No, 1=compression flange, 2=tension flange)
DEFLECTION LIMITATION FOR LIVE LOAD ?
(0=No., 1= L /240, 2= L /360, 3= L /180, 4= L /120)
compression flange
L /240
11.5
ft
ANALYSIS
SECTION PROPERTIES OF EACH METAL STUD (SSMA page 7 & 8)
t =
0.0566
in
Fy =
h =
in
Wt = 0.556 lb/ft
A =
0.556
in2
rx = 2.267 in
J = 0.000594 in4
50
Ixx =
2.86
in4
Sxx =
0.927
in3
ry =
0.57
in
ksi
6
Cw = 1.318 in
Mn/b =
27.76 in-kips
Vn/v =
2708
CHECK MAX WEB DEPTH-TO-THICKNESS RATIO (AISI B1.2)

h/t=
106.01
<
200 [Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY (AISI C3.1)
b =
Mn/
Where
27.76
>
in-kips
[Satisfactory]
M = [(DL+LL) S + Wt ] L2 / 8 =
15.98
in-kips
S=
24
in o.c., spacing as gaven.
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (AISI C3.2)

V =
Vn/
Where
2708 lbs
>
V = [(DL+LL) S + Wt ] L / 2 =
V
463
[Satisfactory]
lbs
CHECK LATERAL-TORSIONAL BUCKLING (AISI C3.1.2)

CASE 1: BOTH TOP & BOTTOM FLANGES UNSUPPORTED
C b r oA
Fe =
ey t =
Sf
Where
Cb =
9.0
ksi
<== Does not apply.
<
<
2.78 Fy =
139.0
ksi
0.56 Fy =
28.0
ksi
1.0
ro = (rx2 + ry2 + xo2)0.5 =

Sf =
E=
G=
0.95
29500
11300
2.572 in
in3
ksi (AISI pg 18)
ksi (AISI pg 21)
Ky =
1.0
Kt =
1.0
Ly =
138
in
Lt =
138
in
ey =
t =
2E
(K yL y / r y)
1
Ar o2
GJ +
2E C w
=
( K t Lt )2
F y , for F e2.78 F e
Fc =
10 F y
10
, for 2.78> F e 0.56 F e
F 1
9 y
36 F e
F e , for F e 0.56 F e
9.0
ksi
lbs
xo = -1.072 in
4.967
ksi
7.305
ksi
(cont'd)
Mn/
b =
5.16
in-kips
Where
Sc =
0.95
b =
1.67
Mn =
Sc Fc =
<
[Satisfactory]
in3 from SSMA page 7 & 8

8.61
in-kips
M = [(DL+LL) S/12 + Wt ] L2 / 8 =
15.98
CASE 2: BOTTOM FLANGE SUPPORTED ONLY

Mn/
b =
Where
16.65
in-kips
Se =
0.93
b =
R=
1.67
0.60
Mn =
RSeFy =
in-kips
<== Does not apply.
>
[Satisfactory]
in3, from Sxx
27.81
in-kips
CHECK CAPACITY COMBINED BENDING & SHEAR AT ANY SAME SECTION (AISI C3.3.1)
2
2
bM
vV
+
<
1.0 [Satisfactory]
=
0.3606
Vn
Mn
Where
M=
V=
15.98
463
in-kips
lbs
Vn/v =
2708
b =
1.67
lbs
Mn = MIN( Bending , Buckling) =

Mn/b =
bM
Mn
0.6
bM
V
+ v
Vn
Mn
CHECK DEFLECTION
LL =
>
0.58
5( LL S ) L 4
384 EI xx
46.359 in-kips
27.76 in-kips, from SSMA page 7 & 8 for bending only.
<
0.5164
0.19
vV
Vn
0.5
in
1.3
<
0.17
<
0.7
[Satisfactory]
L /240 =
0.58
in
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE SCREWS AT EACH LEG OF CONNECTION (SSMA page 48)

Vmax =
463
lbs
vallow =
344
370
384
lbs / screw, for # 8 screws.

==>
==>
==>
(2)- # 8 screws required.

1. AISI STANDARD, 2001 Edition. American Iron and Steel Institute.
2. SSMA, Product Technical Information, ICBO ER-4943P, Steel Stud Manufactures Association, 2001.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
Box Beam Design Based on AISI 2001 & ICBO ER-4943P

x
1000S250-68
VERT. MEMBERS
3
(TOTAL SECTION: 8 x 10 , 50 ksi )
SPAN
L=
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
ft
10
DL =
LL =
kips / ft
kips / ft
0.2
0.36
COMPRESSION FLANGE SUPPORTED ? (0=No, 1=Yes)
DEFLECTION LIMITATION FOR LIVE LOAD ?

(0=No., 1= L /240, 2= L /360, 3= L /180, 4= L /120)
No.
L /240
ANALYSIS
SECTION PROPERTIES OF EACH VERTICAL STUD (SSMA page 7 & 8)
t =
0.0713
in
Fy =
h =
10
in
Wt = 1.121 lb/ft
A =
1.121
in2
rx = 3.749 in
J = 0.001899 in4
50
Ixx =
15.751
in4
Sxx =
2.67
in3
ry =
0.844
in
ksi
6
Cw = 15.726 in
Mn/b =
79.94 in-kips
Vn/v =
3209

h/t=
140.25
<
200 [Satisfactory]
b =
Mn/
19.99
Where
>
ft-kips
M = (DL + LL + Wt ) L2 / 8 =
M
7.04
[Satisfactory]
ft-kips

Vn/
V =
Where
9.63
kips
>
V = (DL + LL + Wt ) L / 2 =
V
2.82
[Satisfactory]
kips
CHECK LATERAL-TORSIONAL BUCKLING (AISI C3.1.2.2)
Lu =
0.36C b
F yS f
Where
Fe =
Where
EGJ I y =
1.38
<
ft
Cb =
1.0
Sf =
E=
G=
9.45
29500
11300
Iy =
25.213
ksi (AISI page 18)

ksi (AISI page 21)
in4 (neglecting top & bottom tracks conservatively.)
J=
0.006
in4
C b
K yL yS f
in3 (total vertical studs, SSMA page 7 & 8.)
EGJ I y =
Ky =
1.0
Ly =
120
19.2
ksi
<
<
2.78 Fy =
139.0
ksi
0.56 Fy =
28.0
ksi
19.2
in
F y , for F e2.78 F e
Fc =
10 F y
10
F 1
9 y
36 F e
, for 2.78> F e 0.56 F e
F e , for F e 0.56 F e
ksi
lbs
xo = -1.514 in
(cont'd)
Mn/
b =
9.04
ft-kips
Where
Sc =
9.45
b =
1.67
Mn =
Sc Fc =
>
[Satisfactory]
in3 (total vertical studs, SSMA page 7 & 8.)

181.16 in-kips
M = (DL + LL + Wt ) L2 / 8 =
7.04
ft-kips
2
2
bM
vV
+
=
0.6925
<
1.0 [Satisfactory]
Vn
Mn
Where
M=
V=
7.04
2.82
ft-kips
kips
Vn/v =
9.63
kips
b =
1.67
Mn = MIN( Bending , Buckling) =

Mn/b =
bM
Mn
0.6
bM
V
+ v
Vn
Mn
CHECK DEFLECTION
LL =
>
0.78
5( LL ) L 4
=
384 EI
15.10 ft-kips
19.99 ft-kips, for bending only.
<
0.76
0.06
vV
Vn
0.5
in
1.3
<
0.29
<
0.7
[Satisfactory]
L /240 =
0.50
in
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
Wall Stud Design Based on AISI 2001 & ICBO ER-4943P

SECTION & SPACING
600S162-97
16
in o.c
( 50 ksi )
WALL HEIGHT
h=
16
ft
hp =
ft
P=
1500
w1 =
25
psf

ECCENTRICITY
w2 =
e=
45
0
psf
in
DEFLECTION LIMITATION ?
(0=No., 1= h /240, 2= h /360, 3= h /180, 4= h /120)
h /240
lbs / ft
ANALYSIS
SECTION PROPERTIES OF EACH METAL STUD (SSMA page 7 & 8)
thk =
0.1017
in
Fy =
50
t =
in
Wt = 0.966 lb/ft
A =
0.966
in2
rx = 2.229 in
J = 0.003329 in4
Ixx =
4.797
in4
Sxx =
1.599
in3
ry =
0.541
in
ksi
6
Cw = 2.093 in
Mn/b =
56.73 in-kips
Vn/v =
11124 lbs
xo = -1.039 in

t / (thk) =
59.00
<
200 [Satisfactory]
b =
Mn/
Where
56.73
x = h + hp
M1 =
>
in-kips / stud
( h+ h p )
2h
Pe
=
h w1
[Satisfactory]
11.25
in-kips / stud
7.50 ft
Pe + w1 ( h 2 h 2p ) S =
2
2 w1h 2
M2=
S=
1.333
2
p
w2h
S=
2
ft o.c., spacing as gaven.

5.76
M = 0.75 MAX( M1 , M2) =
in-kips / stud
8.44
in-kips / stud, (0.75 for wind/seismic, from AISI App. A4.1.2, typical)

V =
Vn/
11124
lbs / stud
>
[Satisfactory]
( h + h p ) w1 + Pe S =
Where V 1 = ( h + h p ) w1
250
2h
h
2
V2 = h w 1 S - V1 =
283
lbs / stud
V3 = hp w2 S =
240
lbs / stud
V = 0.75 MAX( V1 , V2 , V3) =
lbs / stud
213 lbs / stud
CHECK CAPACITY COMBINED BENDING & SHEAR AT ROOF/FLOOR SECTION (AISI C3.3.1)
2
2
bM
vV
+
=
0.0062
<
1.0 [Satisfactory]
Vn
Mn
Where
M=
V=
4.32
213
in-kips / stud, (0.75 included)

lbs / stud, (0.75 included)
Vn/v =
11124
lbs / stud, from SSMA page 7 & 8.
Mn/b =
56.73
in-kips / stud, from SSMA page 7 & 8.
(cont'd)
bM
Mn
0.6
<
0.08
bM
V
+ v
Vn
Mn
vV
Vn
0.5
<
0.0648
1.3
0.02
<
0.7
[Satisfactory]
CHECK COMPRESSION CAPACITY WITH, AT LEAST, ONE FLANGE THOUGH-FASTENED TO SHEATHING (AISI C4.6)
Pn/
c =
Where
9.12
kips / stud
c =
1.8
>
Pn = C1C2C3 AE / 29500 =
C1 = (0.79 x + 0.54) =
P
16.42
[Satisfactory]
kips / stud
0.949
C2 = (1.17 t + 0.93) =
1.049
C3 = (2.5b - 1.63d) + 22.8 =

17.070
E=
29500
ksi (AISI pg 18)
P=
2.30
kips / stud (included wall weight, 18psf.)
CHECK CAPACITY COMBINED AXIAL LOAD & BENDING (AISI C5.2.1)
cP b C mM
+
=
Pn
M n
Where
0.42
<
1.0
[Satisfactory]
M=
P=
8.44
2.30
in-kips / stud, (0.75 included)

kips / stud
Pn/c =
9.12
kips / stud
Mn/b =
56.73
in-kips / stud
Cm =
1.0
P Ex =
2E I x
( K x L x )2
= 1
cP
=
P Ex
37.89
kips / stud
0.891
CHECK DEFLECTION
=
NOTE :
5( w1S ) L 4
384 EI xx
0.35
in
<
h /240 =
0.80
in
[Satisfactory]
1. STUD FLANGES SHALL BE FASTENED TO SHEATHING AT EACH SIDE OF WALL BEFORE VERICAL LOAD ADDED.
2. THE LATERAL LOADS MAY BE REDUCED BY 0.75 PER AISI APPENDIX A.4.1.2 .
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
Jamb/Column Design Based on AISI 2001 & ICBO ER-4943P

x
600S162-68
VERT. MEMBERS
3
(TOTAL SECTION: 6 x 5 , INSIDE 6 in THK. WALL)
( 50 ksi )
0.36
HEIGHT
h=
ft

P=
w=
6.8
0.33
kips
kips / ft
DEFLECTION LIMITATION ?
1
h /240
(0=No., 1= h /240, 2= h /360, 3= h /180, 4= h /120)
ANALYSIS
SECTION PROPERTIES OF EACH VERTICAL STUD (SSMA page 7 & 8)
0.0713
in
Fy =
50
ksi
Ixx =
3.525
in4
t =
in
Wt =
0.693
lb/ft
1.164
in3
A =
0.693
in2
Sxx =
rx =
2.255
in
0.56
in
Cw =
1.596
in6
ry =
thk =
J = 0.001174 in4
Mn/b =
39.46 in-kips
Vn/v =
5468

<
200 [Satisfactory]
t / (thk) =
84.15
Mn/
b =
Where
9.87
>
ft-kips
M = 0.75 w h2 / 8 =
2.51
[Satisfactory]
ft-kips, (0.75 for wind/seismic, from AISI App. A4.1.2, typical)

Vn/
V =
Where
16.40 kips
V = 0.75 w L / 2 =
>
1.11
[Satisfactory]
kips
CHECK COMPRESSION CAPACITY WITH, AT LEAST, ONE FLANGE THOUGH-FASTENED TO SHEATHING (AISI C4.6)
c =
Pn/
Where
18.97
kips
c =
1.8
>
Pn = C1C2C3 AE / 29500 =
C1 = (0.79 x + 0.54) =
P
34.14
[Satisfactory]
kips
0.949
C2 = (1.17 t + 0.93) =
1.013
C3 = (2.5b - 1.63d) + 22.8 =

17.070
E=
29500
ksi (AISI pg 18)
P=
6.82
kips (included studs weight.)
2
2
bM
vV
+
=
0.0389
<
1.0 [Satisfactory]
Vn
Mn
Where
bM
Mn
0.6
M=
V=
1.88
0.84
ft-kips, (0.75 included)

kips, (0.75 included)
Vn/v =
16.40
kips
Mn/b =
9.87
ft-kips
bM
V
+ v
Vn
Mn
<
0.19
0.1652
vV
Vn
0.5
<
1.3
[Satisfactory]
0.05
lbs
xo = -1.061 in
<
0.7
(cont'd)
CHECK CAPACITY COMBINED AXIAL LOAD & BENDING (AISI C5.2.1)
cP b C mM
+
=
Pn
M n
Where
<
1.0
[Satisfactory]
M=
P=
1.88
6.82
ft-kips, (0.75 included)

kips
Pn/c =
18.97
kips
Mn/b =
9.87
in-kips
Cm =
P Ex =
1.0
2E I x
( K x L x )2
= 1
CHECK DEFLECTION
NOTE :
0.56
cP
=
P Ex
5w L4
=
384 EI
263.97 kips
0.954
0.16
in
<
h /240 =
0.45
in
[Satisfactory]
1. STUD FLANGES SHALL BE FASTENED TO SHEATHING AT EACH SIDE OF WALL BEFORE VERICAL LOAD ADDED.
2. THE LATERAL LOADS MAY BE REDUCED BY 0.75 PER AISI APPENDIX A.4.1.2 .
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
Brace Design Based on AISI 2001 & ICBO ER-4943P

SECTION & SPACING
350S125-43
60
in o.c
BRACE LENGTH
BRACE SLOPE
L=
12 /
12
12
ft
WALL LATERAL LOAD, ASD

WALL HEIGHT
Fp =
H=
5
16
psf
ft

ANALYSIS
Check Brace Compression Capacity (AISI C4.6)
P=
Fp ( 0.5 H) S Cos =
c =
Pn/
Where
0.31
kips / brace
c =
1.8
Ae =
ry =
0.272
0.41
0.283
kips / brace
>
in2 (SSMA page 6-7, ICBO ER-4943P)

in (SSMA page 6-7, ICBO ER-4943P)
E=
29500
Fe = 2 E / (KL / ry)2 =
ksi (AISI pg 18)
Fy =
ksi
33
C = (Fy / Fe)0.5 =
[Satisfactory]
ksi
3.74
0.658 c2 F y , for c 1.5

F n = 0.877
F y , for c > 1.5
2
2.1
ksi
Pn = Ae Fn =
NOTE :
0.56
kips / brace
THE LATERAL LOADS MAY BE REDUCED BY 0.75 PER AISI APPENDIX A.4.1.2 .
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
Connection Design of Jamb to Track Based on AISI 2001 & ICBO ER-4943P
JAMB MEMBERS
3
x
600S250-43
(TOTAL SECTION: 6 x 8 , INSIDE 6 in THK. WALL)
TOP TRACK
( 16 GA , 50 ksi )
600T200-54
JAMB LATERAL LOAD
F=
0.2
kips
11.5

ANALYSIS
SECTION PROPERTIES OF TOP TRACK (SSMA page 10 & 11)
t =
2
in, leg length
Fy =
thk =
wall =
50
0.0566
6
ksi
in, metal thickness
in, wall thickness
<
track width
[Satisfactory]
CHECK BENDING CAPACITY OF TRACK LEG

d =
8
in, jamb width
o
b = d + 2 t (tan 60 ) =
14.9
M = F (t + 1/4") / 2 =
2
S = b (thk) / 6 =
in, effective width

in-kips
3
0.0080 in
fb = M / S =
28
0.2
ksi
<
(4/3) Fy [Satisfactory]
(If jamb lateral load have reduced 0.75, the factor 4/3 does not apply. AISI App. A4.1.2)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
Seismic Design for Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Based on IBC & AISC Seismic
BRACE SECTION (Tube or Pipe)
BRACE AXIAL LOAD AT SERVICE LEVEL
BRACE AXIAL LOAD AT HORIZ. SEISMIC
= > HSS5X5X3/8
20
kips
D=
L=
10
kips
QE =
50
kips (IBC 1617.1)
SEISMIC PARAMETER
UNBRACED LENGTH OF THE BRACE
SDS = 0.533 (IBC 1615.1.3)

= 14.142 ft
Tube
rmin
6.18
1.87
0.35
5.00
BUILDING LIMITATION FOR SDC D or E

H=
10
ft (< 35 ft, IBC 2003)
REQUIRED CONNECTION = >
( 1/2 in Gusset Plate with 17 in Length, 4 leg, 1/4 in Fillet Weld. Cover Plate 3/4 x 4 at Each Sides.)
CHECK LIMITING WIDTH THICKNESS RATIO ps FOR COMPRESSION ELEMENT, LOCAL BUCKLING (AISC Seismic 02 Tab. I-8-1)
D / t = 0.044 Es / Fy
36.46 , for Pipe
>
( D / t = 1300 / Fy for AISC-Seismic 97, Tab. 1-9-1)

0.5
h / t = 0.64 (Es / Fy)
Actual
[Satisfactory]
16.07 , for Tube
[ h / t = 110 / (Fy)0.5 for AISC-Seismic 97, Tab. 1-9-1]

Where
Fy =
46
ksi
Es =
29000
ksi
CHECK LIMITING SLENDERNESS RATIO FOR V OR INVERTED-V CONFIGURATIONS (AISC Seismic 02 Sec. 14.2)
4.23 (Es / Fy) =
K /r=
>
90.6 [Satisfactory]
106.2
0.5
[ 720 / (Fy)
Where
for AISC-Seismic 97, Sec. 14.2]

K =
1.0
DETERMINE FACTORED DESIGN LOADS (IBC 1617.1.2, AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. C-I-4.1)
Put = 0.9D - 0QE - 0.2SDSD =
-84.13 kips (Tension)
Puc = 1.2D + f1L + 0QE + 0.2SDSD =

Where
0 =
131.13 kips (Compression, Governs)
(IBC Tab. 1617.6, AISC Seiemic Tab. I-4.1, Pg. 7)
f1 =
0.5
(IBC 1605.4)
(Note: the special seismic load combinations above must be used to determine all member and connection forces.)
CHECK DESIGN STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION (LRFD Sec.E2)
cPn = cAgFcr =
Where
139.17
c =
c =
>
kips
Puc
[Satisfactory]
0.85
0.5
K / (r) (Fy / E)
1.15
Fcr =
(0.658
c^2
)Fy =
0.877 / (c )Fy =
2
26.49 kis, for c <1.5

N/A
DETERMINE CONNECTION DESIGN FORCE (AISC Seismic 02 & 97 Sec. 14.2)

Put = RyFyAg =
Where
369.56
kips (Tension)
Ry =
1.3
(AISC Seiemic 02 & 97 Tab. I-6-1)
( 1.4 for Pipe)
DETERMINE BEST FILLET WELD SIZE (LRFD Sec.J2.2b)
> wMIN =
0.1875 in
w=
1/4
in
< wMAX =
0.25
in
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE REQUIRED WELD LENGTH (LRFD Sec.J2.4)
L = Put / [(4) Fw (0.707 w)]
= 369.56 / [(4) 0.75 (0.6x70)(0.707x1/4)] =
16.59 in
( USE
17
in )
CHECK DESIGN SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE (LRFD Sec.J4.1)
Pn = (0.6Fu)Anv =
=
Where
Fu =
619.41
0.75
58
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
ksi (LRFD Tab.1-4, Pg. 1-21)
in
Anv = 4 t L = 4 x 0.349 x 17 =
23.73
DETERMINE REQUIRED THICKNESS OF GUSSET PLATE (LRFD Tab. J2.4)
tg =
1/2
in
CHECK SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF GUSSET PLATE (LRFD Sec.J4.1)
Pn = (0.6Fu)Anu = 443.70
=
Where
0.75
Fu =
58
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
17.00
in2
ksi (A36 Steel)
Anu = 2 tg L = 2 x 1/2 x 17 =
50
kis, for c >1.5
(cont'd)
CHECK TENSION CAPACITY AT SLOTED BRACE (LRFD Sec.D1).

Pn = Fu Ae = 222.30
=
Where
0.75
kips
<
Put
[Cover Plate Required]
Fu =
x =
58
3 h / 8 = 1.88 , for Tube (HSS Spectification 2.1-4)
D / = 1.59 , for Pipe (HSS Spectification 2.1-3)
U = MIN( 1 - x / L , 0.9 ) =
0.89
,(LRFD B3.)
2
An = Ag - 2 (tg + 1/8) t =
5.74 in
Ae =
U An =
Try Cover Plate
3/4
Region
HSS
Cover Plate
1.88
2.88
5.11
in
, at Each Sides.
xA
0.5 An
2.87
3.00
5.38
8.63
5.87
14.01
x = 14.01 / 5.87 =
2.39
U = MIN( 1 - x / L , 0.9 ) =
0.86
2
An = 5.74 + 6.00 =
11.74 in
2
Ae = U An = 10.10 in
Thus,
Pn = Fu Ae = 439.16
Where
Fu =
58
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
ksi, use plate value
1. Rafael Sabelli: "Structuiral Engineering Review Workshop", BYA publications, 2005.
4. AISC: "Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings", American Institute of Steel Construction, May 1, 2002.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames Based on CBC 2001
= > HSS8X8X5/8
D=
24
kips
L=
11
kips
Tube
Eh =
40
kips (CBC 30A-1)
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
Ca =
I=
=
=
0.44
1.15
1.5
18.5
(CBC Tab. 16A-Q)

(CBC Tab. 16A-K)
CHEVRON BRACING ?
SUM OF HORIZ. FORCES EXCEED 70% ?
=>
=>
Yes
No
(CBC 2213A.8.4.1)
(CBC 2213A.8.2.3)
rmin
16.40
2.98
0.58
8.00
THE BRACE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
ft
( 1/2 in Gusset Plate with 5 in Length, 4 leg, 5/16 in Fillet Weld.)
CHECK LIMITING WIDTH THICKNESS RATIO FOR COMPRESSION ELEMENT, LOCAL BUCKLING (CBC Sec. 2213A.8.2.5)
D / t = 1300 / Fy
h / t = 110 / (Fy)
0.5
37.14 , for Pipe
16.22 , for Tube
>
Actual
[Satisfactory]
[Note: For building of two stories or less, this condition need not be met if oPc < (1.7)Pc,allow. (CBC 2213A.8.5) ]
CHECK LIMITING SLENDERNESS RATIO (CBC 2213A.8.2.1)
720 / (Fy)0.5 =
K /r=
>
106.2
74.4
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE ALLOWABLE DESIGN LOADS (CBC 1612A.3.1, 2213A.8.2, & 2213A.8.4.1)

Pt = 0.9D - f (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
-49
kips (Tension)
Pc = D + f 0.75[L + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4] =

Pc = D + f (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
Where
f = o x
o =
1.5
1
89
kips (Compression)
95
kips (Compression, Governs)
1.50
(1.5 for chevron bracing or force not exceed 70%, CBC 2213A.8.4.1)
(If force not exceed 70%, 1.0 should apply, CBC 2213A.8.2.3)
CHECK STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION (ASD Sec.E2)

Pc,allow = A(BFa) =
Where
234.03
K =
Fy =
46
Es =
29000
Cc = (22Es/Fy)0.5 =
K
/r=
F = (K
kips
>
Pc
[Satisfactory]
1.0
ksi
Fa =
ksi
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
2
12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
19.03 kis, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
kis, for Cc < (K /r)
112
74
/ r) / Cc =
0.67
B = 1/( 1 + F/2) =
0.75
(If force exceed 70%, 1.0 should apply, CBC 2213A.8.2.3)
DETERMINE CONNECTION DESIGN FORCE (CBC Sec. 2213A.8.3.1)

Pconn= MAX[1.4Pc, MIN(FyA , D+L+oEh)] =
Where
o =
2.2
133
kips (Compression)
(CBC Tab. 16A-N)
DETERMINE BEST FILLET WELD SIZE (ASD Sec.J2.2b)

> wMIN =
w=
5/16
in
< wMAX =
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE REQUIRED WELD LENGTH (ASD Sec.J2.4 )
L = Pconn / [(1.7)(4) (0.3) Fu (0.707 w)]
= 132.71 / [(1.7)(4) (0.3) (70) (0.707x5/16)] =
( USE
0.1875 in
0.4375 in
4.21
5
in
in )
28
(cont'd)
CHECK SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE (ASD Sec.J4)
Pt,rup,brace =1.7(0.3Fu)Anu =
Where
Fu =
343.72
58
kips
>
Pconn
[Satisfactory]

2
in
11.62
Anu = 4 t L = 4 x 0.581 x 5 =
DETERMINE REQUIRED THICKNESS OF GUSSET PLATE (ASD Tab. J2.4)
1/2
in
tg =
CHECK SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF GUSSET PLATE (ASD Sec.J4 & CBC 2213A.4.2)
Pt,rup,gusset =1.7(0.3Fu)Anv = 147.9
Where
Fu =
58
kips
>
Pconn
[Satisfactory]
5.00
in2
ksi (plate value)
Anv = 2 tg L = 2 x 1/2 x 5 =
CHECK TENSION CAPACITY AT SLOTED BRACE (ASD Sec.D1).

Pt,brace = 1.7(0.5FuUAn) =
590.28
kips
>
Pconn
Where
U =
0.75
An = A - 2 t tg =
CHECK GUSSET BLOCK SHEAR CAPACITY (ASD J4)

Ps,guss = 1.7[0.3FuAnv + 0.5FuAgt] =
148 +1.7[0.5FuAgt]
[Satisfactory]
(ASD Sec.B3)
> Pconn = 132.7
2
15.964 in
1. ICBO: "2001 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2", 2002.
2. SEAOC: "Seismic Design Manual - Volume 3", International Code Council, 2000.
3. AISC: "Manual of Steel construction 9th", American Institute of Steel Construction, 1990.
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
BEAM SECTION
BEAM DISTRIBUTED SERVICE LOADS
= > W16X77
D=
1
kips / ft
BEAM LENGTH
BEAM YIELD STRESS
LATERALLY UNBRACED LENGTH
L=
=
0.5
28
kips / ft
ft
Fy =
50
ksi
b=
14
ft
=>
A
22.9
d
16.5
tw
0.46
bf
10.30
tf
0.76
Sx
136
Ix
1120
rx
6.99
ry
2.45
Zx
152
k
1.47
CHECK LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (ASD Tab. B5.1)

bf / (2tf ) =
6.78
d / tw =
36.26
<
<
65 / (Fy)0.5 =
9.19
640 / (Fy)0.5 =
90.51 [Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
THE BEAM SHOULD BE DESIGNED AS IF BRACES DO NOT EXIST (CBC Sec.2213A.8.4.1-3)

M = (D + L) 2/ 8 =
147.0
ft-kips
DETERMINE GOVERNING UNBALANCED SEGMENT LENGTH (AISC-ASD F1)
0.5
, 20000/(d/Af)Fy] =
9.23 ft
c = MIN[76bf/(Fy)
u
3
= MAX[rT(102000Cb/Fy)0.5 , 12000Cb/(d/Af)0.6Fy] =
= rT(510000Cb/Fy)
Where
0.5
15.81
ft
22.04 ft
(d/Af) =
2.11
rT =
2.62
Cb =
1.00
in-1
CHECK ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS
Fb =
Where
0.66Fy
N/A
ksi, for Lb @ [0, Lc]
0.60Fy
30.00
ksi, for Lb @ (Lc, Lu]
MAX(Fb1, Fb3)
N/A
ksi, for Lb @ (Lu, L3]
MAX(Fb2, Fb3)
N/A
ksi, for Lb @ (L3, Larger)
Fb1 = MIN{[2/3 - Fy(L/rT)2/(1530000Cb)]Fy , 0.6Fy} =

Fb2 = MIN[170000Cb/(L/rT)2, Fy/3] =
16.67 ksi
Fb3 = MIN[12000Cb/(Ld/Af), 0.6Fy] =
30.00 ksi
26.61
ksi
CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY

Mallow = FbSx =
340
ft-kips
>
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
COLUMN SECTION
COLUMN AXIAL SERVICE LOADS
= > W12X50
D=
80
kips
L=
30
kips
COLUMN AXIAL LOAD AT HORIZ. SEISMIC

UNBRANCED COLUMN LENGTH
Eh =
=
110
14
kips (CBC 1630A.1.1)

ft
COLUMN YIELD STRESS (36 or 50)
Fy =
50
ksi
=>
A
14.6
d
12.2
tw
0.37
bf
8.08
tf
0.64
Sx
64.2
Ix
rx
ry
Zx
391
5.18
1.96
72
1.14
DETERMINE DESIGN LOADS (CBC 2213A.5.1)

Pt = 0.85D - 0Eh =
-174
Pc = D + 0.7L + 0Eh =
Where
kips (Tension)
343
0 =
2.2
(CBC Tab. 16A-N)
CHECK COMPRESSION CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2 & ASD E2)

Pc,allow = 1.7FaA =
Where
443.8
K =
Es =
kips
>
Pc
[Satisfactory]
1.0
29000
2
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
0.5
MAX(K
x/rx, K
F = (K
/ r) / Cc =
ksi
Fa =
107
y/ry) = 85.55
<
200
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
2
12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
17.88 kis, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
[Satisfactory]
0.80
1.5
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Special Concentrically Braced Frames Based on IBC & AISC Seismic
= > HSS10.750X0.500
D=
29
kips
L=
19
kips
QE = 204 kips (IBC 1617.1)
SEISMIC PARAMETER
SDS =
=
1
18.8
1.26
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
Pipe
rmin
15.00
3.64
0.47
10.75
(IBC 1615.1.3)
ft
LENGTH OF END BRACE TO JUNCTION

Lg =
17
in
( 1 in Gusset Plate with 14 in Length, 4 leg, 1/4 in Fillet Weld.)
CHECK LIMITING WIDTH THICKNESS RATIO FOR COMPRESSION ELEMENT, LOCAL BUCKLING (AISC Seismic 02 Tab. I-8-1)
D / t = 0.044 Es / Fy
36.46 , for Pipe
>
( D / t = 1300 / Fy for AISC-Seismic 97, Tab. 1-9-1)

h / t = 0.64 (Es / Fy)
0.5
Actual
[Satisfactory]
16.07 , for Tube
[ h / t = 110 / (Fy)0.5 for AISC-Seismic 97, Tab. 1-9-1]

Where
Es =
29000
ksi
Fy =
35
ksi
CHECK LIMITING SLENDERNESS RATIO FOR V OR INVERTED-V CONFIGURATIONS (AISC Seismic 02 Sec. 13.2a)
5.87 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
K / r = 61.9 [Satisfactory]
>
169.0
[ 1000 / (Fy)0.5 for AISC-Seismic 97, Sec. 13.2a]
Where
K =
1.0
DETERMINE FACTORED DESIGN LOADS (IBC1605.2 & AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. C-I-4.1, Pg. 78)
Put = 0.9D - QE - 0.2SDSD =
-236.74 kips (Tension)
Puc = 1.2D + f1L + QE + 0.2SDSD =

Where
f1 =
307.14 kips (Compression, Governs)
0.5
CHECK DESIGN STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION (LRFD Sec.E2)

cPn = cAgFcr =
Where
366.69
c =
c =
kips
>
Puc
[Satisfactory]
0.85
K
/ (r) (Fy / E)0.5 =
Fcr =
0.68
c^2
(0.658
)Fy =
0.877 / (c2 )Fy =
28.76 kis, for c <1.5

N/A
kis, for c >1.5
DETERMINE CONNECTION DESIGN FORCE (AISC Seismic Sec. 13.3a)

Put = MIN(RyFyAg , Pmax) =
Where
307.14 kips (Tension)
Ry =
1.4
Pmax =
307.14
(AISC Seiemic Tab. I-6-1, Pg. 8)

kips, (the max force, indicated by analysis, that can be transferred
to the brace by the system.)

> wMIN =
w=
1/4
in
< wMAX =
[Satisfactory]
0.1875 in
0.3125 in
L = Put / [(4) Fw (0.707 w)]

= 307.14 / [(4) 0.75 (0.6x70)(0.707x1/4)] =
( USE
13.79 in
14
in )
CHECK SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE

(LRFD Sec.J4.1)
Pn = (0.6Fu)Anu =
=
Where
Fu =
703.08
0.75
60
kips
14
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
Anu = 4 t L = 4 x 0.465 x 14 =
26.04
in

tg =
1
in
(cont'd)

Pn = (0.6Fu)Anv = 730.80
=
Where
0.75
Fu =
58
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
28.00
in
ksi (A36 Steel)
Anv = 2 tg L = 2 x 1 x 14 =
CHECK GUSSET BLOCK SHEAR CAPACITY (LRFD J4-3b)
Rn = (0.6Fu)Anv + FyAgt =
CHECK GUSSET COMPRESSION CAPACITY (LRFD E2)
730.80 + FyAgt
>
cPn = cFcrLwtg =
Put =
307.14
[Satisfactory]
Where
CHECK GUSSET TENSION YIELDING CAPACITY (LRFD D1.a)

tPn = tFyLwtg =
Where
872.07
t =
0.9
Fy =
36
kips
Put
633.22 kips
0.85
1.2
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
rg = tg / (12)0.5 =
0.29 in
K Lg / rg < 200
[Satisfactory]
c =
(LRFD E2-4, Pg 6-47)
Fcr =
[Satisfactory]
0.793
27.677 ksi (LRFD Sec.E2, Pg 6-47)
ksi (plate value)

o
Lw = D +2
>
c =
K =
tan30 =
26.916 in
CHECK SHEAR LAG FRACTURE OF BRACE (LRFD Sec.D.1)

Pn = Fu Ae = 474.45
=
0.75
Where
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
Fu =
x =
60
U = MIN( 1 - x / L , 0.9 ) =
0.76
,(LRFD B3.)
2
13.95 in
An = Ag - 2 (tg + 1/8) t =
Ae =
U An = 10.54 in
Try Cover Plate
1/2
Region
HSS
Cover Plate
3.42
5.06
, at Each Sides.
xA
0.5 An
6.98
2.50
9.48
x = 36.54 / 9.48 =
3.86
U = MIN( 1 - x / L , 0.9 ) =
An = 13.95 + 5.00 =
18.95
23.87
12.66
36.54
0.72
Ae = U An = 13.73 in
Thus,
Pn = Fu Ae = 597.44
Where
Fu =
58
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
ksi (plate value)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
BEAM SECTION
= > W27X307
D=
0.2 kips / ft
L = 0.35 kips / ft
L =
25
ft
0
No
Fy =
50
ksi
BEAM LENGTH
TOP FLANGE CONTINUOUSLY BRACED ?
BEAM YIELD STRESS
=>
A
90.4
d
29.6
Ix
13100
tw
1.16
rx
12.04
bf
14.40
ry
3.41
tf
2.09
Zx
1030
Sx
887
k
2.88
DETERMINE FACTORED AXIAL LOAD ON THE BEAM (AISC Seiemic 02 & 97 Sec. 13.4a)
280.92 kips
Pu = 0.5 (RyFyAg + 0.3cPn) cos =
Where
Ry =
1.4
=
Fy =
48.33
35
Ag =
15.00
ksi (see brace sheet)

in2 (see brace sheet)
cPn =
366.69
kips (see brace sheet)
(AISC Seiemic Tab. I-6-1, see brace sheet)

o
CHECK LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. I-8-1)

0.5
bf / (2tf ) =
3.44
<
0.3 (Es / Fy) = 7.22
[ 52 / (Fy)
0.5
Where
[Satisfactory]
for AISC Seismic 97, Tab. I-9-1]
Es =
29000 ksi
0.5
3.14(Es/Fy) (1-1.54Pu/bPy) =
h / tw =
67.58 , for Pu/bPy < 0.125
0.5
[ 520 / (Fy) (1-1.54Pu/bPy) for AISC Seismic 97, Tab. I-9-1]
<
20.55
0.5
1.12(Es/Fy) (2.33-Pu/bPy) =
N/A
0.5
0.5
, for Pu/bPy > 0.125
{ MAX[ 191 / (Fy) (2.33-Pu/bPy) , 253 / (Fy) ] for AISC Seismic 97, Tab. I-9-1}
Where b =
[Satisfactory]
0.9
, Py = FyA =
4520
kips
DETERMINE UNBALANCED VERTICAL FORCE ON BEAM (AISC Seiemic 02 & 97 Sec. 13.4a)
Qb = (RyFyAg - 0.3cPn) sin =
466.83 kips (Vertical)
DETERMINE FACTORED MOMENT ON THE BEAM
2
Mnt = (1.2D + 0.5L) L / 8 + Qb l/ 4 =
2950.11
ft-kips
1
DETERMINE UNBALANCED SEGMENT LENGTH ABOUT X - AND Y - AXES

Lx =
25
ft
Ly =
12.5
ft ( AISC Seiemic Sec.13.4a-4 ,lateral supported at the intersection of chevorn braces
CHECK COMPRESSION CAPACITY (LRFD E2)

cPn = cFcrA =
3334.61
Where
with axial load 0.02 Fy bf tf .)

kips
>
Pu
[Satisfactory]
0.85
c =
K =
1.0
MAX(KL x/rx, KL y/ry) =
44.01
<
200
[Satisfactory]
c =
(LRFD E2-4, Pg 6-47)
0.582
Fcr =
43.40
ksi (LRFD E2.a or b, Pg 6-47)
DETERMINE FLEXURAL DESIGN STRENGTH (AISC-LRFD F1)

Lb =
12.50
ft
L p = 1.76 ry (E / Fyf)
0.5
12.04
L r = ry X1 [1 + (1 + X2 FL2 )
0.5 0.5
/ FL =
ft
46.65
M p = MIN( Fy Zx , 1.5 Fy Sx) =
4291.7 ft-kips
M r = FL Sx =
ft-kips
2956.7
2
2
2 0.5
M cr = Cb Sx ry X1 (2 + X1 X2 ry / Lb ) / Lb =
Where
X 1 = (0.5 E G J A)
0.5
/ Sx =
2
X 2 = 4 Cw [Sx / (G J)] / Iy =
Fr =
10.00
b Mn
23961
ft-kips
4312.8
0.0005
ksi
FL = MIN( Fyf - Fr , Fyw) =
Mn
ft
40.00
Iy
Cw
1050
11200
101
199000
ksi
Cb =
1.30
Mp
N/A
MIN{Cb [Mp - (Mp - Mr) (Lb - Lp) / (Lr - Lp)] , Mp}
4291.7 ft-kips, for L b @ (L p , L r]
MIN(Mcr , Mp)
N/A
= 0.9 Mn =
3862.5
, (AISC-LRFD Table 4.1)
ft-kips
ft-kips, for L b @ [0 , L p]
ft-kips, for L b @ (L r , Larger)
(cont'd)
CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY (LRFD C1)
Mu = B1Mnt =
2970.14
Where
<
ft-kips
Pe1 = 2EsIx / (KL x)2 =
41661
Cm =
(LRFD C1-3, Pg 6-41)
1.0
B1 = Cm/(1 - Pu/Pe1) =
kips
Where
1.007
CHECK INTERACTION CAPACITY (LRFD H1.1)

For Pu/cPn>0.2,
Pu / cPn + 8 / 9 (Mux / bMnx) =
For Pu/cPn<0.2,
bMnx = MIN(bFyZ, MxCb) =
Pu / (2cPn) + Mux / bMnx =
3863
ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
N/A
0.81
<
b =
0.9
Cb =
1.67
(LRFD Tab 4-1, Pg 4-9)
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
COLUMN SECTION
= > W14X132
D = 135 kips
L=
34
kips

QE =
=
274
14
kips (IBC 1617.1)

ft
Fy =
50
ksi
=>
A
38.8
d
14.7
tw
0.65
bf
14.70
tf
1.03
Ix
rx
ry
Zx
1530
6.28
3.76
234
Sx
209
k
1.63
DETERMINE FACTORED DESIGN LOADS (IBC 1617.1.2, AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. C-I-4.1)
Put = 0.9D - QE - 0.2SDSD =
-251 kips (Tension)
551 kips (Compression, Governs)

Puc = 1.2D + f1L + QE + 0.2SDSD =
=
1.26
Where
f1 =
0.5
(IBC 1605.4)
bf / (2tf ) =
7.14
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
7.22
[Satisfactory]
[ 52 / (Fy)0.5 for AISC Seismic 97, Tab. I-9-1]

Where
Es =
29000 ksi
3.14(Es/Fy)0.5(1-1.54Pu/bPy) =
h / tw =
<
17.74
N/A
, for Pu/bPy < 0.125
[ 520 / (Fy)0.5(1-1.54Pu/bPy) for AISC Seismic 97, Tab. I-9-1]

1.12(Es/Fy)0.5(2.33-Pu/bPy) =
54.33 , for Pu/bPy > 0.125
{ MAX[ 191 / (Fy)0.5(2.33-Pu/bPy) , 253 / (Fy)0.5] for AISC Seismic 97, Tab. I-9-1}
Where c =
[Satisfactory]
0.9
Py = Fy A =
1940
kips

cPn = cFcrA =
Where
c =
K =
MAX(K
c =
Fcr =
1424.83
kips
0.85
1.0
x/rx, K y/ry) = 44.70
0.591
>
Pu
[Satisfactory]
<
200
[Satisfactory]
(LRFD E2-4, Pg 6-47)
43.20
CHECK AMPLIFIED SEISMIC LOAD EFFECTS FOR Pu / Pn > 0.4 (AISC Seismic 02 8.3, AISC Seismic 97 8.2 )
Puc / Pn =
0.39
<
Puc = 1.2D + f1L + 0QE + 0.2SDSD =

Where
0 =
[Amplified Seismic Load Do Not Need to Checke]

754 kips
<
c P n
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Special Concentrically Braced Frames Based on CBC 2001
= > HSS8X8X5/8
D=
24
kips
L=
11
kips
Eh =
228
kips (CBC 30A-1)
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
Ca =
I=
=
=
0.44
1.15
1.5
18.5
(CBC Tab. 16A-Q)

(CBC Tab. 16A-K)
Lg =
17
LENGTH OF END BRACE TO JUNCTION

Tube
rmin
16.40
2.98
0.58
8.00
ft
in
( 1 in Gusset Plate with 17 in Length, 4 leg, 5/16 in Fillet Weld.)
THE LIMITING WIDTH THICKNESS RATIO FOR COMPRESSION ELEMENT, LOCAL BUCKLING (CBC Sec. 2213A.9.2.4)
D / t = 1300 / Fy
h / t = 110 / (Fy)
Where
0.5
Fy =
46
37.14 , for Pipe
16.22 , for Tube
>
Actual
[Satisfactory]
ksi
THE LIMITING SLENDERNESS RATIO FOR V OR INVERTED-V CONFIGURATIONS (CBC Sec. 2213A.9.2.1)
1000 / (Fy)0.5 =
K / r = 74.4 [Satisfactory]
147.4
>
Where
K =
1.0
THE ALLOWABLE DESIGN LOADS (CBC Sec. 1612A.3.1)

Pt = 0.9D - (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
-227
Pc = D + 0.75[L + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4] =

273
Pc = D + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
THE DESIGN STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION (ASD Sec.E2)
Pc,allow = AFa =
Where
Es =
312.07
kips
29000
ksi
Cc = (22Es/Fy)0.5 =
K
/r=
F = (K
>
112
kips (Compression)

Pc
Fa =
74
/ r) / Cc =
kips (Tension)
219
[Satisfactory]
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
122Es/[23(K /r)2] =
0.67
THE CONNECTION DESIGN FORCE (CBC Sec. 2213A.9.3.1)

Pconn = MAX(1.4Pc , MIN(FyA , D+L+oEh) =
537
kips (Tension)
2.2
(CBC Tab. 16A-N)
Where
o =
THE BEST FILLET WELD SIZE (ASD Sec.J2.2b)
> wMIN =
0.1875 in
w=
5/16
in
< wMAX =
0.4375 in
[Satisfactory]
THE REQUIRED WELD LENGTH (ASD Sec.J2.4 & CBC 2213A.4.2)
L = Pt / [(4) 1.7 (0.3) Fu (0.707 w)]
= 536.60 / [(4) 1.7 (0.3) (70) (0.707x5/16)] =
17.01 in
( USE
17
in )
THE DESIGN SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE
(ASD Sec.J4 & CBC 2213A.4.2)
>
Pt
Pt,rup,brace =1.7(0.3Fu)Anu = 1168.65 kips
[Satisfactory]
Where
Fu =
58
39.51
Anu = 4 t L = 4 x 0.581 x 17 =
THE REQUIRED THICKNESS OF GUSSET PLATE (ASD Tab. J2.4)
tg =
in
in2
19.03 kis, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
(cont'd)
THE DESIGN SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF GUSSET PLATE (ASD Sec.J4 & CBC 2213A.4.2)
Pt,rup,gusset =1.7(0.3Fu)Anv = 1005.7
Where
Fu =
58
kips
>
Anv = 2 tg L = 2 x 1 x 17 =
THE TENSION CAPACITY AT SLOTED BRACE (ASD Sec.D1).
Pt,brace = 1.7(0.5FuUAn) =
751.23
kips
>
Where
U =
Fy =
Lw = D +2
36
[Satisfactory]
34.00
in2
Pconn
THE GUSSET BLOCK SHEAR CAPACITY (ASD J4)

Ps,guss = 1.7[0.3FuAnv + 0.5FuAgt] =
1006 +1.7[0.5FuAgt]
[Satisfactory]
(ASD Sec.B3)
> Pconn = 536.6
2
15.238 in
An = A - 2 t tg =
THE GUSSET TENSION YIELDING CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2)
Pt,guss = FyLwtg =
994.68
kips
>
[Satisfactory]
Where
Pconn
ksi (plate value)
Pconn
ksi (plate value)

o
tan30 =
27.63
THE GUSSET COMPRESSION CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2)

Pc,guss = 1.7FaLwtg = 768 kips
>
Pconn
[Satisfactory]
Where
in
[Satisfactory]
K =
1.2
rg = tg / (12)0.5 =
0.29 in
K Lg / rg < 200
(ASD B7)
Cc =
(ASD E2, Pg 5-42)
Fa =
126
[Satisfactory]
16.361 ksi (ASD E2, Pg 5-42)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
BEAM SECTION
= > W24X279
D=
1
kips / ft
L=
=
BEAM LENGTH
TOP FLANGE CONTINUOUSLY BRACED ?
0.5
28
Fy =
BEAM YIELD STRESS
=>
A
82
kips / ft
ft
Yes
50
ksi
d
26.7
tw
1.16
bf
13.30
tf
2.09
Sx
718
Ix
9600
rx
10.82
ry
3.17
Zx
835
k
2.59

THE UNBALANCED AXIAL LOAD ON THE BEAM
Pc = 0.5[FyAg + 1.7(0.3Pc,allow)] cos =
=
Where
40.82
345.7
kips
Fy =
46
ksi (see brace sheet)
Ag =
16.40
in2 (see brace sheet)
Pc,allow =
312.07
kips (see brace sheet)
THE LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (ASD Tab. B5.1)

bf / (2tf ) =
3.18
d / tw =
23.02
< = does not apply for top flange continuously braced.
65 / (Fy)0.5 =
<
<
N/A
[Satisfactory]
640 (1 - 3.74 Pc / Py) / (Fy)0.5 =
N/A
, for Pc / Py < 0.16
257 / (Fy)0.5 =
N/A
, for Pc / Py > 0.16
Where Py = FyA =
[Satisfactory]
4100
kips
THE UNBALANCED VERTICAL FORCE ON BEAM (CBC Sec.2213A.9.4.1)

Pb = [FyAg - 1.7(0.3Pc,allow)] sin =
389.1
kips (Vertical)
THE FACTORED MOMENT ON THE BEAM (CBC Sec.2213A.9.4.1-3)

(1.2D + 0.5L) 2/ 8 + Pb / 4 =
ft-kips
2865.9
Mb = (0.9D) 2/ 8 - P
-2636 ft-kips,not govern.
b /4 =
THE UNBALANCED SEGMENT LENGTH ABOUT X - AND Y - AXES

28
ft
x=
y
14
ft ( CBC Sec.2213A.9.4.1-4 ,lateral supported at the intersection of chevorn braces.)
THE COMPRESSION CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2 & ASD E2)

Pc,allow = 1.7FaA =
Where
K =
Es =
3327.7
kips
1.0
29000
ksi
Cc = (22Es/Fy)0.5 =
MAX(K
x/rx, K
F = (K
/ r) / Cc =
>
Pc
[Satisfactory]
Fa =
107
<
y/ry) = 53.03
200
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
122Es/[23(K /r)2] =
[Satisfactory]
0.50
THE FLEXURAL CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2)

Ms = F y Z x =
3479
>
ft-kips
Mb
[Satisfactory]
THE INTERACTION CAPACITY (ASD N4, Pg 5-95)

Pc / Pc,allow + Cm Mb / [(1 - Pc / Ps) Ms] =
Where
<
0.963
<
1.0
Fe = 12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
53.1
ksi
Ps = (23/12)Fe A =
kips
Pc / (A Fy) + Mb / (1.18Ms) =
Cm =
0.782
[Satisfactory]
(ASD H1)
1.00
2
1.0
[Satisfactory]
8346
23.87 ksi, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
ksi, for Cc < (K /r)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
COLUMN SECTION
= > W12X50
D=
80
kips
L=
30
kips

Eh =
=
110
14
kips (CBC 1630A.1.1)

ft
Fy =
50
ksi
=>
A
14.6
d
12.2
tw
0.37
bf
8.08
tf
0.64
Sx
64.2
Ix
rx
ry
Zx
391
5.18
1.96
72
1.14
THE LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (CBC 2213A.9.5 ,CBC 2213A.7.3, & ASD N7 Pg 5-96)
bf / (2tf ) =
<
6.31
7.00
[Satisfactory]
THE DESIGN LOADS (CBC 2213A.5.1)

Pt = 0.85D - 0Eh =
-174
Pc = D + 0.7L + 0Eh =
Where
kips (Tension)
343
0 =
2.2
(CBC Tab. 16A-N)
THE COMPRESSION CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2 & ASD E2)

Pc,allow = 1.7FaA =
Where
443.8
K =
Es =
kips
>
Pc
[Satisfactory]
1.0
29000
2
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
0.5
MAX(K
x/rx,
F = (K
/ r) / Cc =
y/ry)
ksi
Fa =
107
= 85.55
<
200
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
2
12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
17.88 kis, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
[Satisfactory]
0.80
18.5
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Ecconcentrically Braced Frames Based on IBC & AISC Seismic
LINK SECTION
=>
MAX SERVICE LOADS AT LINK END
VDL =
=>
1.8
kips
PDL =
7.4
kips
MDL =
14.4
ft-kips
tw
bf
tf
Sx
22.9
16.5
0.46
10.30
0.76
136
Ix
rx
ry
Zx
1120
6.99
2.45
152
k
1.47
VLL =
1.3
kips
PLL =
5.3
kips
THE LINK DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
MLL =
9.6
ft-kips
( USE 1/2 x 4-3/4 @ 16 in o.c. INTERMEDIATE
VE =
84
kips (QE, IBC 1617.1)
& END STIFFENERS WITH 1/4" FILLET WELD.)
PE =
5.5
ME =
e=
168
4
ft-kips (QE, IBC 1617.1)

ft
Fy =
=
SDS =
L=
h=
=
50
1.19
1
30
12.5
0.7
ksi
MAX HORIZ. SEISMIC LOADS AT LINK END
LINK LENGTH
LINK YIELD STRESS
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
SEISMIC PARAMETER
BEAM LENGTH BETWEEN COL. CENTERS
STORY HEIGHT
MAXIMUM INELASTIC STORY DRIFT
W16X77
(IBC 1615.1.3)
ft (inclding link)
ft
in (IBC eq.16-46)
DETERMINE FACTORED DESIGN LOADS AT LINK END (IBC1605.2 & AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. C-I-4.1)
Vu = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)VDL + f1VLL + VE =
103.13 kips
Pu = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)PDL + f1PLL + PE =
19.56
Mu = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)MDL + f1MLL + ME =
224.88 ft-kips
kips
f1 =
0.5
(IBC 1605.4)
Where
bf / (2tf ) =
6.78
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
7.22
[Satisfactory]

Where
Es =
29000 ksi
3.14(Es/Fy)0.5(1-1.54Pu/bPy) =
h / tw =
<
29.80
73.41 , for Pu/bPy < 0.125
0.5

1.12(Es/Fy)0.5(2.33-Pu/bPy) =
N/A
[Satisfactory]
Where b =
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (AISC Seiemic 02 & 97, Sec. 15.2)
Vn = MIN(Vp, 2Mp/e) =
Where
184.0 kips
Where
, Py = Fy A =
>
Vu
Aw = (d - 2tf)tw =
6.82
in2
Vp = 0.6FyAw =
204.5
kips
633.3
ft-kips
Mu
[Satisfactory]
570.0
>
b =
0.9
1145
[Satisfactory]
CHECK ADDITIONAL SHEAR CAPACITY REQUIREMENT FOR Pu>0.15Py ONLY (AISC Seiemic 15.2)
Vna = MIN(Vpa, 2Mpa/e) =
Where
184.0 kips
>
Vu
< = DOES NOT APPLY.
[Satisfactory]
0.9
Vpa = Vp[1 - (Pu/Py)2 ]0.5 =
204.4
kips
Mpa = 1.18 Mp(1 - Pu/Py) =
734.6
ft-kips
CHECK ADDITIONAL LINK LENGTH REQUIREMENT FOR Pu>0.15Py ONLY (AISC Seiemic 15.2)
e
kips
(Ignored axial force effect since Pu < 0.15 Py = 0.15 Fy Ag, AISC Seiemic 15.2)
0.9
Mp = F y Z =
CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY (LRFD F1.1)
b Mp =
0.9
<
[Satisfactory]
< = DOES NOT APPLY.
[1.15 - 0.5' (Aw/Ag)](1.6Mp/Vp) =
N/A
ft, for ' (Aw/Ag) > 0.3
(1.6Mp/Vp) =
4.96
ft, for ' (Aw/Ag) < 0.3
Where ' = Pu / Vu =
Aw / Ag =
0.19
0.30
(cont'd)
CHECK LINK ROTATION ANGLE LIMITATION (AISC Seiemic 02 & 97, Sec. 15.2)
p = L / (h e) =
Where
0.04
rad
<
p,allowable =
0.080
rad
[Satisfactory]
p,allowable == 0.08 rad for e < 1.6Mp/Vp;

= 0.02 rad for e > 2.6Mp/Vp;
= linear interpolation [0.02, 0.08] by e value.
1.6Mp/Vp =
4.96
ft,
2.6Mp/Vp =
8.05
ft
CHECK LINK STIFFENER REQUIREMENT (AISC Seiemic 15.3)

bst = (bf - 2tw) /2 =
4.70
tst = MAX (0.75 tw , 3/8 ) =
in
0.375
in
USE 3/8 x 4-3/4 END STIFFENERS AT EACH SIDE.

s = see table following =
Provide 2 stiffeners to give s =
Where
17.9
16.0
in
in
1.6 Mp / Vp =
4.96
ft
2.6 Mp / Vp =
8.05
ft
ft
5.0 Mp / Vp =
15.49
p =
0.04
rad
e=
d=
4
16.5
ft
in
tst = MAX (tw , 3/8 ) =
0.455
in
USE 1/2 x 4-3/4 @ 16 in o.c. INTERMEDIATE

STIFFENERS AT EACH SIDE.
e
[0~1.6Mp/Vp]
p
(0.02 ~ 0.08)
[0 ~ 0.02]
52tw-d/5
(1.6Mp/Vp~2.6Mp/Vp] MIN(52tw-d/5 , bf)

(2.6Mp/Vp~5Mp/Vp)
[5.0Mp/Vp~Greater]
0.08
178tw/3-d/5-1100ptw/3
Min(178tw/3-d/5-1100ptw/3 , 1.5bf)
1.5bf
Not ReqD
30tw-d/5
MIN(30tw-d/5 , 1.5bf)
1.5bf
1.5bf
Not ReqD
Not ReqD
The best fillet weld size (LRFD Sec.J2.2b)

> wMIN =
w=
1/4
in
< wMAX =
0.1875 in
0.3125 in
[Satisfactory]
The required weld length between A36 stiffener and web(LRFD Sec.J2.4 & AISC Seiemic 02 & 97, Sec. 15.3)
Lw = AstFy / [(2) Fw (0.707 w)]
= (3/8 x 4-3/4) x 36 / [(2) 0.75 (0.6x70)(0.707x1/4)] =
4.07
in
<
(d - 2k), [Satisfactory]
The required weld length between A36 stiffener and flange (LRFD Sec.J2.4 & AISC Seiemic 02 & 97, Sec. 15.3)
Lf = 0.25AstFy / [(2) Fw (0.707 w)]
= 0.25(3/8 x 4-3/4) x 36 / [(2) 0.75 (0.6x70)(0.707x1/4)] =
<
1.02
CHECK COMBINED LINK CAPACITY (SEAOC Design Manual Vol. 3, page 104)
f = Pu,link / (2Af) + Mu,link / Zf =
Where
<
42.3
Pu,link = Pu =
38.8
Mu,link = Vp (e/2) =
409.0
ft-kips
Zf = (d - tf) bf tf =
123.2
in3
= Vn / Vu =
1.98
Af = bf tf =
7.83
Fy
in
(bst - k), [Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
kips
in2
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
=>
MAX SERVICE LOADS
PDL =
11.8
kips
PLL =
8.3
kips
HSS10X10X5/8
Tube
rmin
21.00
3.80
0.58
10.00
18
ft
Lb =
(SEE LINK DESIGN SPREADSHEET FOR BALANCE OF INPUT DATA)
DETERMINE LIMITING WIDTH THICKNESS RATIO FOR COMPRESSION ELEMENT, LOCAL BUCKLING (LRFD Tab. B5.1)
D / t = NA
, for Pipe
Actual
[Satisfactory]
>
0.5
=
28.01 , for Tube
h / t = 190 / (Fy)
Where
Fy =
46
ksi
Es =
29000
ksi
DETERMINE FACTORED DESIGN LOADS (AISC Seiemic 02 & 97Sec.15.6)

Pu = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)PDL + f1PLL + PE =
Where
572.8
PE = 1.25 Ry [Vn L Lb / (L-e) h] =

Ry =
1.3
kips
552.1
kips
(1.4 for Pipe.)
DETERMINE DESIGN STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION (LRFD Sec.E2)

cPn = cAgFcr =
661.06
c =
c =
K =
kips
>
Pu
[Satisfactory]
0.85
K / (r) (Fy / E)0.5 =
0.72
Fcr =
1.0
c^2
(0.658
)Fy =
0.877 / (c )Fy =
2
37.03 kis, for c <1.5

N/A
kis, for c >1.5
DETERMINE CONNECTION DESIGN FORCE

Put = Pu =
572.76
kips (Tension)

> wMIN =
w=
5/16
in
< wMAX =
[Satisfactory]
0.1875 in
0.4375 in
L = Put / [(4) Fw (0.707 w)]

= 572.8 / [(4) 0.75 (0.6x70)(0.707x5/16)] =
20.57 in
( USE
21
in )
CHECK DESIGN SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE
(LRFD Sec.J4.1)
Rn = (0.6Fu)Anu =
=
Where
Fu =
1273.78
0.75
58
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]

2
in
48.80
Anu = 4 t L = 4 x 0.581 x 21 =
5/8
in
tg =
Rn = (0.6Fu)Anv = 685.13
=
0.75
Where
Fu =
58
kips
>
Put
ksi (plate value)
26.25
Anv = 2 tg L = 2 x 5/8 x 21 =
tPn = tRyFuUAn =
Where
t =
U =
1146.48
0.75
1
An = A - 2 t tg =
[Satisfactory]
kips
>
Put
[Satisfactory]
(LRFD Sec.B3.2d)
2
20.274 in
in2
THE GUSSET BLOCK SHEAR CAPACITY (LRFD J4-3b)
Rn = (0.6Fu)Anv + FyAgt =
685.13
>
Put =
[Satisfactory]
+ FyAgt
572.76
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
MAX SERVICE LOADS AT OUTSIDE OF LINK
VDL =
6.8
kips
PDL =
kips
MDL =
17
ft-kips
VLL =
4.8
kips
PLL =
0.7
kips
MLL =
11.3
ft-kips
VE =
8.7
PE =
105
ME =
113
ft-kips (QE, IBC 1617.1)
SEISMIC LOADS AT OUTSIDE OF LINK
12.5
THE DESIGN IS INADEQUATE, SEE ANALYSIS B
DETERMINE FACTORED DESIGN LOADS AT SECTION OF LINK AND BEAM (AISC Seiemic 02 & 97, Sec. 15.6 & Tab. C-I-4.1)
Vu = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)VDL + f1VLL + VE =
42.4
kips
Pu = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)PDL + f1PLL + PE =
298.7
kips
Mu = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)MDL + f1MLL + ME =
524.3
ft-kips
f1
Where
0.5
Ry =
1.1
Vn =
204.5
Mn = Vn e / 2 =
(IBC 1605.4)
(AISC Seiemic Tab. I-6-1)
kips (from link design)
408.95 ft-kips
VE = (1.1Ry Vn / VE , link) VE =
25.6
kips
PE = 1.1Ry Vn L / 2h =
296.9
kips
ME = 1.1Ry Mn =
494.8
ft-kips

bf / (2tf ) =
6.78
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
7.22
[Satisfactory]

Where
Es =
29000 ksi
3.14(Es/Fy)0.5(1-1.54Pu/bPy) =
h / tw =
<
29.80
N/A
0.5

1.12(Es/Fy)0.5(2.33-Pu/bPy) =
55.03 , for Pu/bPy > 0.125
Where b =
[Satisfactory]
CHECK UNBALANCED SEGMENT LENGTH
12.41
1 = (L - e - dc) / 2 =
=
/2=
6.20
25.8 kips, [AISC Seiemic Sec.15.5]

7.8 kips, [AISC Seiemic Sec.15.6.(2)]
10.8 ft-kips, [AISC Seiemic Sec.15.6.(2)]

cPn = cFcrA =
Where
c =
K =
MAX(K
c =
Fcr =
909.95
kips
0.85
1.0
1/rx, K 2/ry) = 30.33
0.401
46.75
1145
kips
at each end of the link segment.)
ft, ( lateral supported at middle of beam outside of link with following design strength.)
Brace Load : Pb,mid = 0.02Fy bf tf =

Mb,mid =0.02Fy bf tf d =
, Py = FyA =
ft, (top & bottom flange bracing with a design strength greater than below will be provided
Brace Load : Pb,link = 0.06Ry Fy bf tf =

2
0.9
>
Pu
[Satisfactory]
<
200
[Satisfactory]
(LRFD E2-4, Pg 6-47)

(cont'd)
Lb =
6.20
ft
L p = 1.76 ry (E / Fyf)0.5 =
8.67
ft
L r = ry X1 [1 + (1 + X2 FL2 )0.5 ]0.5 / FL =
25.40
633.3
ft-kips
M r = FL Sx =
ft-kips
453.3
M cr = Cb Sx ry X1 (2 + X12 X2 ry2 / Lb2)0.5 / Lb =

Where
2767.7
Iy
tf
ry
Sx
X 2 = 4 Cw [Sx / (G J)]2 / Iy =
0.0025
22.9
138
0.76
2.45
136
10.00
ksi
b Mn
6373.8 ft-kips
X 1 = (0.5 E G J A)0.5 / Sx =
Fr =
Mn
ft
40.00
ksi
Cw
Zx
29000
11200
3.86
8570
152.0
Cb =
1.30
Mp
633.33 ft-kips, for L b @ [0 , L p]
N/A
ft-kips, for L b @ (L p , L r]
MIN(Mcr , Mp)
N/A
= 0.9 Mn =
570
ft-kips
CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY (LRFD C1)

Mux = B1Mu =
Where
524.28
Pe1 = 2EsI x / (K
Cm =
x)
<
ft-kips
= 14459
0.6
B1 = Cm/(1 - Pu/Pe1) =
kips
bMnx = Min(Ry bFyZ, bMn) =
570
[Satisfactory]
(LRFD C1-3, Pg 6-41)
Where
b =
0.9
1.000
CHECK INTERACTION CAPACITY (LRFD H1.1)

For Pu/cPn>0.2,
Pu / cPn + 8 / 9 (Mux / bMnx) =
1.15
For Pu/cPn<0.2,
Pu / (2cPn) + Mux / bMnx =
N/A
>
[Unsatisfactory]
ft-kips
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
COLUMN SECTION
=>
PDL =
151
kips
PLL =
n=
46
4
kips
NUMBER OF STORIES
Fy =
50
ksi
W14X99
=>
tw
bf
tf
Sx
29.1
14.2
0.49
14.60
0.78
157
Ix
1110
rx
6.18
ry
3.72
Zx
173
k
1.38
THE DESIGN IS INADEQUATE, SEE ANALYSIS BELOW

=h=
14
ft
DETERMINE COLUMN AXIAL SEISMIC LOAD (AISC Seiemic 02, & 97, Sec. 15.8)
PE = (n - 1) 1.1 Ry Vn =
742.25 kips
DETERMINE FACTORED DESIGN LOADS (IBC1605.2 & AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. C-I-4.1, Pg. 78)
Pu,t = (0.9 - 0.2SSD ) PDL - PE =
-637 kips (Tension)
Pu,c = (1.2 + 0.2SDS)PDL + f1PLL + PE =

Where
f1 =
0.5
977
kips (Compression)
(IBC 1605.4)

bf / (2tf ) =
9.36
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
>
7.22
[Unsatisfactory]

Where
Es =
29000 ksi
3.14(Es/Fy)0.5(1-1.54Pu/bPy) =
h / tw =
<
23.59
N/A
0.5

1.12(Es/Fy)0.5(2.33-Pu/bPy) =
42.73 , for Pu/bPy > 0.125
Where c =
[Satisfactory]
0.9
Py = Fy A =
1455
kips

cPn = cFcrA =
Where
c =
K =
MAX(K
c =
Fcr =
1065.14
kips
0.85
1.0
x/rx, K y/ry) = 45.20
0.597
43.06
>
Pu
[Satisfactory]
<
200
[Satisfactory]
(LRFD E2-4, Pg 6-47)

Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Ecconcentrically Braced Frames Based on CBC 2001

LINK SECTION
=>
MAX SERVICE LOADS AT LINK END
VDL =
W16X77
=>
1.8
kips
PDL =
7.4
kips
MDL =
14.4
ft-kips
VLL =
1.3
kips
tw
bf
tf
Sx
22.9
16.5
0.46
10.30
0.76
136
Ix
rx
ry
Zx
1120
6.99
2.45
152
k
1.47
PLL =
5.3
kips
MLL =
9.6
ft-kips
VE =
84
kips (CBC 30A-1)
THE LINK DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
PE =
5.5
kips (CBC 30A-1)
( USE 1/2 x 4-3/4 @ 16 in o.c. INTERMEDIATE
ME =
e=
168
4
ft-kips (CBC 30A-1)

ft
& END STIFFENERS WITH 1/4" FILLET WELD.)
LINK LENGTH
LINK YIELD STRESS
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
STORY HEIGHT
MAXIMUM INELASTIC STORY DRIFT
Fy =
=
I=
Ca =
L=
h=
M =
50
1.19
1.15
0.57
30
14
0.7
ksi
MAX HORIZ. SEISMIC LOADS AT LINK END
(CBC Tab. 16A-K)

(CBC Tab. 16A-Q)
ft (inclding link)
ft
in (CBC eq.30A-17)
DETERMINE ALLOWABLE DESIGN LOADS (CBC Sec. 1612A.3.1)

LC1 = D + 0.75[L + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4]
LC2 = D + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4
V = MAX(LC1 , LC2) =
P = MAX(LC1 , LC2) =
M = MAX(LC1 , LC2) =
73.6
14.9
160.6
kips
kips
ft-kips
CHECK LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (CBC Sec. 2213A.10.2, ASD Tab. B5.1)
bf / (2tf ) =
6.78
d / tw =
36.26
52 / (Fy)0.5 =
<
<
7.35
0.5
640 (1 - 3.74 Pc / Py) / (Fy)

0.5
257 / (Fy)
86.11 , for Pc / Py < 0.16
N/A
Where Py = FyA =
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
1145
, for Pc / Py > 0.16
kips
CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.10.3)

Mrs = Zx(fy - fa) =
Where
621.3
fa = P / (2bftf) =
Af = b f t f =
7.83
ft-kips
>
0.95
ksi
[Satisfactory]
in2
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.10.3, 2213A.10.5)

= Vs / V =
Where
2.80
>
min = 1.0 / 0.8 = 1.25
Vs = MIN( 0.55Fydtw , 2Mrs/e ) =
206.5
[Satisfactory]
kips
CHECK COMBINED LINK CAPACITY USING LOADS ANTICIPATED TO YIELD LINK (SEAOC Design Manual Vol. 3)
f = Plink / (2Af) + Mlink / Zf =
Where
42.9
<
kips
Plink = P =
41.7
Mlink = Vs (e/2) =
412.9
ft-kips
Zf = (d - tf) bf tf =
123.2
in3
Fy
[Satisfactory]
CHECK LINK ROTATION ANGLE LIMITATION (CBC 2213A.10.4)

p = L M / (h e) =
Where
0.031
rad
<
p,allowable =
0.090
p,allowable == 0.09 rad for e < 1.6Ms / Vs;

= 0.03 rad for e > 2.6Ms / Vs;
= linear interpolation [0.03, 0.09] by e value.
1.6Mrs / Vs =
4.81
ft,
3.0Mrs / Vs =
9.03
ft
rad
[Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
CHECK LINK STIFFENER REQUIREMENT (CBC 2213A.10.7 to 2213A.10.11)
bst = (bf - 2tw) /2 =
4.70
tst = MAX (0.75 tw , 3/8 ) =
in
0.375
in
USE 3/8 x 4-3/4 END STIFFENERS AT EACH SIDE.

s = see table following =
22.0
in
s
2Mrs/e > 0.45Fydtw
[0 ~ 0.03]
2Mrs/e < 0.45Fydtw
56tw-d/5
Not ReqD
65tw-d/5-300ptw
(0.03 ~ 0.09)
0.09
38tw-d/5
Provide 2 pair stiffeners to give s =

Where
16.0
p =
0.03
rad
e=
ft
tst = MAX (tw , 3/8 ) =
in
0.455 in
USE 1/2 x 4-3/4 @ 16 in o.c. INTERMEDIATE

> wMIN =
w=
1/4
in
< wMAX =
0.1875
in
0.3125
in
0.45
[Satisfactory]
The required weld length between A36 stiffener and web (ASD Sec.J2.4 & CBC 2213A.4.2)
Lw = Ast Fy / [(2)(1.7)(0.3Fu)(0.707 w)]
= (3/8 x 4-3/4) x 36 / [(2)(1.7)(0.3x70)(0.707x1/4)] =
3.59
in
<
(d - 2k), [Satisfactory]
<
(bst - k), [Satisfactory]
The required weld length between A36 stiffener and flange (ASD Sec.J2.4 & CBC 2213A.4.2)
Lf = 0.25Ast Fy / [(2)(1.7)(0.3Fu)(0.707 w)] = 0.25(3/8 x 4-3/4) x 36 / [(2)(1.7)(0.3x70)(0.707x1/4)] =
0.90
in
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

=>
MAX SERVICE LOADS
PDL =
11.8
kips
PLL =
8.3
kips
HSS10X10X5/8
Tube
rmin
21.00
3.80
0.58
10.00
18
ft
Lb =
THE DESIGN IS INADEQUATE, SEE ANALYSIS
CHECK LIMITING WIDTH THICKNESS RATIO FOR COMPRESSION ELEMENT, LOCAL BUCKLING (CBC Sec. 2213A.8.2.5)
D / t =1300 / Fy
0.5
h / t = 110 / (Fy)
Where
Fy =
46
37.14 , for Pipe
16.22 , for Tube
K =
Actual
[Unsatisfactory]
ksi
CHECK LIMITING SLENDERNESS RATIO (CBC 2213A.8.2.1)

720 / (Fy)0.5 =
K /r=
106.2
>
Where
<
56.8
[Satisfactory]
1.0

LC1 = D + 0.75[L + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4]
LC2 = D + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4
Where
288.0
PE = 1.3 [Vs L Lb / (L-e) h] =

Vs =
206.5
kips
382.9
kips
(see LINK sheet)
DETERMINE DESIGN STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION (ASD Sec.E2)

P
Pc,allow = AFa =
456.76
kips
>
Where
Es =
29000
2
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
K /r=
0.5
112
Fa =
57
F = (K / r) / Cc =
[Satisfactory]
ksi
(1-F /2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F /8) =
21.75 kis, for Cc > (K /r)
122Es/[23(K /r)2] =
N/A
0.51
DETERMINE CONNECTION DESIGN FORCE (AISC Seismic Sec. 13.3a)

Pconn = P =
288.03
kips (Tension)
DETERMINE BEST FILLET WELD SIZE (ASD Sec.J2.2b)

> wMIN =
w=
5/16
in
< wMAX =
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE REQUIRED WELD LENGTH (ASD Sec.J2.4 )
0.1875 in
0.4375 in
L = Pconn / [(4)(0.3Fw)(0.707 w)]

= 288.0 / [(4)(0.3x70)(0.707x5/16)] =
( USE
15.52 in
16
in )
CHECK DESIGN SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE (ASD Sec.J4)

Pt,rup,brace =(0.3Fu)Anu =
647.00
Fu =
Where
58
kips
>
Pconn
[Satisfactory]
Anu = 4 t L = 4 x 0.581 x 16 =
37.18
in
DETERMINE REQUIRED THICKNESS OF GUSSET PLATE (ASD Tab. J2.4)

tg =
5/8
in
Pt,rup,gusset =(0.3Fu)Anv = 348.00
Where
Fu =
58
kips
>
Pconn
[Satisfactory]
20.00
in
ksi (plate value)
Anv = 2 tg L = 2 x 5/8 x 16 =
Pt,brace = (0.5FuUAn) =
Where
U =
511.51
0.87
An = A - 2 t tg =
kips
>
THE GUSSET BLOCK SHEAR CAPACITY (ASD J4)

Pconn
Ps,guss = [0.3FuAnv + 0.5FuAgt] =
[Satisfactory]
= 348.00 +[0.5FuAgt]
(ASD Sec.B3)
> Pconn = 288.03 [Satisfactory]
20.274 in
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

MAX SERVICE LOADS AT OUTSIDE OF LINK
VDL =
6.8
kips
PDL =
kips
MDL =
17
ft-kips
VLL =
4.8
kips
PLL =
0.7
kips
MLL =
11.3
ft-kips
VE =
8.7
kips (CBC 30A-1)
PE =
105
kips (CBC 30A-1)
ME =
113
ft-kips (CBC 30A-1)
SEISMIC LOADS AT OUTSIDE OF LINK
168
DETERMINE DESIGN LOADS AT SECTION OF LINK AND BEAM (CBC 2213A.10.13)

LC1 = D + 0.75[L + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4]
LC2 = D + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4
V = MAX(LC1 , LC2) =
M = MAX(LC1 , LC2) =
Where
30.5
229.5
447.0
Vs =
229.4
Ms = Vn e / 2 =
kips
kips
ft-kips
kips (from link design)

458.8
VE = (1.3 Vs / VE , link) VE =
ft-kips
30.9
PE = MAX[1.3(Vs L / 2h) , PE]=

ME = MAX[1.3 Mn , ME] =
kips
319.5
596.4
kips
ft-kips
CHECK LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (CBC Sec. 2213A.10.2, ASD Tab. B5.1)
bf / (2tf ) =
d / tw =
52 / (Fy)0.5 =
<
6.78
<
36.26
7.35
[Satisfactory]
0.5
640 (1 - 3.74 Pc / Py) / (Fy)

0.5
257 / (Fy)
N/A
, for Pc / Py < 0.16
36.35 , for Pc / Py > 0.16
Where Py = FyA =
[Satisfactory]
=
1145
kips
CHECK UNBALANCED SEGMENT LENGTH. (CBC 2213A.10.18)

1
= (L - e) / 2 =
2=
13
ft, (top & bottom flange bracing with a design strength greater than below will be provided
Pb,link = 0.06Fy bf tf =
Where
1/2=
6.5
<
Where
23.5 kips, (brace axial load.)
at each end of the link segment.)
ft, ( lateral supported at middle of beam outside of link with following design strength.)
max
= 76 bf / (Fy)0.5 =
9.23
ft
[Satisfactory]
Pb,mid = 0.01Ry Fy bf tf =
3.9
kips, (brace axial load.)
Mb,mid = 0.01Ry Fy bf tf d =
5.4
kips, (brace bending load.)

Pc,allow = 1.7FaA =
Where
1048.4
K =
Es =
>
kips
Pc
[Satisfactory]
1.0
29000
2
0.5
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
ksi
MAX(K
1/rx, K
F = (K
/ r) / Cc =
Fa =
107
<
2/ry) = 31.77
200
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
2
12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
[Satisfactory]
0.30
CHECK FLEXURAL CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2)

Ms = FyZx =
633
ft-kips
>
[Satisfactory]
CHECK INTERACTION CAPACITY (ASD N4, Pg 5-95)

Pc / Pc,allow + Cm M / [(1 - Pc / Ps) Ms] =
Pc / (A Fy) + M / (1.18Ms) =
Where
Cm =
1.00
<
1.0
147.9
ksi
1.0
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
(ASD H1)
2
2
Fe = 12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
Pe = (23/12)Fe A =
<
0.951
0.906
6492
kips
26.93 ksi, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
ksi, for Cc < (K /r)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

COLUMN SECTION
=>
PDL =
151
kips
PLL =
n=
46
4
kips
NUMBER OF STORIES
Fy =
50
ksi
W14X211
=>
A
62
tw
bf
tf
Sx
15.7
0.98
15.80
1.56
338
Ix
2660
rx
6.55
ry
4.08
Zx
390
k
2.16

=h=
14
ft
DETERMINE COLUMN AXIAL SEISMIC LOAD (CBC 2213A.10.14)

PE = (n - 1) 1.25 Vs =
860.23 kips

Pt = 0.85PD - oPE =
-2280 kips (Tension)
Pc = 1.0PD + 0.7PL + oPE =

Where
o =
2592
2.8
kips (Compression)
(CBC Tab. 16A-N)

Pc,allow = 1.7FaA =
Where
2704.6
K =
Es =
kips
>
Pc
[Satisfactory]
1.0
29000
2
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
0.5
MAX(K
x/rx,
F = (K
/ r) / Cc =
y/ry)
ksi
Fa =
107
= 41.22
<
200
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
122Es/[23(K /r)2] =
[Satisfactory]
0.39
25.66 kis, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Intermediate/Ordinary Moment Resisting Frames Based on AISC Seismic - LRFD
COLUMN SECTION
=>
W14X132
A
38.8
d
14.7
tw
0.65
bf
tf
Sx
14.70
1.03
209
= > W21X122
Ix
1530
rx
6.28
ry
3.76
Zx
234
k
1.63
A
35.9
d
21.7
tw
0.60
bf
12.40
Ix
2960
rx
9.08
ry
2.91
Zx
307
k
1.46
BEAM SECTION
tf
0.96
Sx
273
STRUCTURAL STEEL YIELD STRESS
Fy =
50
ksi
THE FACTOR AXIAL LOAD ON THE COLUMN

AVERAGE STORY HEIGHT OF ABOVE & BELOW
Pu =
L=
h=
200
28
12
kips
ft
ft
(Continuity column stiffeners 1 x 7

with 7/16" fillet weld to web & CP to flanges.
A doubler plate is required with thickness of 13/16 in. )
ANALYSIS
THE SEISMIC DESIGN FACTOR COMPARISON
FRAME TYPE
SMRF
IMRF
OMRF
o
3
3
3
R
8
6
4
Cd
5 1/2
5
3 1/2
L/d
7
5
5
CHECK BEAM LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. I-8-1)

bf / (2tf ) =
6.46
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
7.22
[Satisfactory]

Where
h / tw =
31.30
Es =
29000 ksi
2.45 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
59.00
[Satisfactory]
[ 418 / (Fy)0.5 for FEMA Sec. 3.3.1.2]

CHECK COLUMN LOCAL BUCKING LIMITATION (AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. I-8-1)
bf / (2tf ) =
7.14
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
7.22
[Satisfactory]

3.14(Es/Fy)0.5(1-1.54Pu/bPy) =
h / tw =
<
17.74
62.28 , for Pu/bPy < 0.125

1.12(Es/Fy)0.5(2.33-Pu/bPy) =
N/A
Where b =
[Satisfactory]
0.9
, Py = FyA =
1940
kips
CHECK CONTINUITY PLATE REQUIREMENT ((AISC Seismic 02 Sec. 10.5, AISC Seismic 97 Sec. 10.3, FEMA Sec. 3.3.3.1)
tcf = MIN{ bbf / 6 , 0.4[1.8bbf tbf (FybRyb) / (FybRyb)] 0.5 }=
1.85
in
>
actual tcf
(The continuity plates required.)
tst = tbf for interior connection, or (tbf /2) for exterior connection =
bst =
cPn,st = cFcr A =
Where
1.79 (Es / Fyst )0.5 tst =
<
in
0.96
in,USE
50.80
in, (LRFD Sec. K1.9)

[Satisfactory]
1.00
in, ( 1 in )
703.6 kips
c =
0.85
hst = dc - 2k =
11.44
K =
0.75
K hst / rst < 200
(LRFD B2)
[Satisfactory]
I = tst (2bst + twc) / 12 =
259
in
c =
0.029
(LRFD E2-4, Pg 6-47)
A = 2bsttst + 25(twc) 2 =
23
in2
Fcr =
35.99
ksi (LRFD Sec.E2, Pg 6-47)
Fyst =
36
0.5
rst = ( I / A )
Pu,st = Ryb Fyb bfb tfb =
3.36 in
654.7 kips

> wMIN =
w=
7/16
in
< wMAX =
<
cPn,st
0.25
in
0.5625
in
kips, plate yield stress
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
The required weld length between A36 continuity plates and column web (FEMA Fig 3-6)
Lw = 0.6tstLnstFy / [(2) Fw (0.707 w)]
Where
Lnet = dc - 2(k + 1.5) =
= (1 x 8.4) x 36 / [(2) 0.75 (0.6x70)(0.707x7/16)] =

8.4
<
(Use complete joint penetration groove welds between continuity plates & column flanges.)
7.12
in
2(Lnet -0.5) [Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
CHECK PANEL ZONE THICKNESS REQUIREMENT (FEMA Sec. 3.3.3.2, No additional requirement for AISC Seismic.)
tReqD = MAX (t1, t2) =
1.41
in
t1 = Cy Mpr (h - db ) / [0.9 (0.6) Fyc Ryc dc (db - tfb) h] =

Where
Cy = Sb / (Cpr Zb) =
1.41
Cpr =
1.15
(FEMA Sec. 3.5.5.1)
Ry =
1.1
Sb = 2Ib / db =
Ib = Ix =
273
2960
1
in2
in
Mpr = Nb CprRyFyb Zb =
Nb =
in
0.77
1618 ft-kips
12
, (if double side connection of beams, input 2)
t2 = (dz + wz ) / 90 = (db -2tst + dc - 2k) / 90 =

0.65
in
Since twc =
required with thickness of 13/16 in.
<
0.35
in
tReqD ,
a doubler plate is
1. FEMA 350: "Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-frame Buildings.", SAC Joint Venture, 2000.
4. AISC: "Manual of Steel construction, LRFD, 2th", American Institute of Steel Construction, 1998.
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Ordinary Moment Resisting Frames Based on CBC 2001 - ASD
COLUMN SECTION
=>
W14X211
A
62
d
15.7
tw
0.98
bf
tf
Sx
15.80
1.56
338
= > W30X108
Ix
2660
rx
6.55
ry
4.08
Zx
390
k
2.16
A
31.7
d
29.8
tw
0.55
bf
10.50
Ix
4470
rx
11.87
ry
2.15
Zx
346
k
1.41
BEAM SECTION
tf
0.76
Sx
299
Fy =
50
ksi
THE GRAVITY LOAD (1.2D + 0.5 L) ON THE BEAM

wg =
=
2
28
klf
ft
COLUMN AXIAL LOAD AT SERVICE LEVEL
D=
L=
113
75
kips
kips
Eh =
5.5
kips (CBC 30A-1)
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
Ca =
I=
=
h=
0.44
1.15
1.25
12
(CBC Tab. 16A-Q)

(CBC Tab. 16A-K)
ft
THE OMRF DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
(Continuity column stiffeners 13/16 x 7

A doubler plate is not required. )
DETERMINE ALLOWABLE COLUMN DESIGN LOADS (CBC 1612A.3.1, 2213A.8.2, & 2213A.8.4.1)
Pt = 0.9D - (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
76
kips (Compression)
Pc = D + 0.75[L + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4] =

Pc = D + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
138
188
kips (Compression)
CHECK BEAM - COLUMN RATIO REQUIREMENT (SEAOC Design Manual, Vol. III, Pg 182, & CBC2213A.7.5)
Mpc* / (Mpb* ) =
Where
2.09
>
1.25
>
1.00
Mpc* = Nc Zc (Fyc - Pc / Ag ) =
Nc =
3053 ft-kips
CBC 2213A.7.7.1)
, (if only one column below, input 1)
Mpb* = Nb (Mpr + Mv) =

Nb =
[Satisfactory]
The column flanges need to be laterally supported only at the beam top flange.
1459 ft-kips
Mv = 0.5wg(L -dc)(0.5dc) =
17
Mpr = Fyb Zb =
ft-kips
1442
ft-kips
DETERMINE COLUMN DESIGN LOADS (CBC 2213A.5.1)

Pt = 0.85D - 0Eh =
81
kips (Compression)
2.8
(CBC Tab. 16A-N)
Pc = D + 0.7L + 0Eh =
Where
181
0 =
CHECK COLUMN COMPRESSION CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2 & ASD E2)

Pc,allow = 1.7FaA =
Where
2262.8
K =
>
kips
Pc
[Satisfactory]
1.0
Es =
29000
2
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
0.5
ksi
Fa =
107
MAX(K x/rx, K y/ry) =
67.10
F = (K / r) / Cc =
0.63
<
200
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
21.47 kis, for Cc > (K /r)
122Es/[23(K /r)2] =
N/A
[Satisfactory]
CHECK CONTINUITY PLATE REQUIREMENT (SEAOC Design Manual, Vol. III, Pg 182, FEMA Sec. 3.3.3.1 & CBC 2213A.7.4)
bst =
>
in
Pbf = 1.8bfbtfbFyb =
Fyst =
36
0.76
3.01
2
4.2156 in , (ASD K1-9)
Ast = [Pbf - Fyc twc(tfb + 5kc)] / Fyst =

Where
bfb /3 - twc /2 =
718.2 kips, (CBC 2213A.7.4)

The best fillet weld size (ASD Sec.J2.2b)

> wMIN =
w=
1/2
in
< wMAX =
[Satisfactory]
0.25
in
0.6875 in
in,USE
in, (ASD Sec. K1.8)
<
tst bst
0.81
in, ( 13/16 in )
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
(Cont'd)
Lw = Pbf / [(2) 1.7 (0.3Fu )(0.707 w)]
= 718.2 / [(2) 1.7 (0.3x70)(0.707x1/2)] =
21.46 in
<
Where
Lnet = dc - 2(k) =
2(Lnet) [Satisfactory]
11.4
CHECK PANEL ZONE THICKNESS REQUIREMENT (SEAOC Design Manual, Vol. III, Pg 182, & CBC 2213A.7.2)
0.62
in
t1 = Vz / (0.55Fycdc) - 3bfctfc / (dcdb) =

Where
0.62
in, (CBC 13A-1)
Vz = Nb [(0.8) Mf / (db - tfb/2) - (0.8)Mf / h] =

374.3 kips
(SEAOC Design Manual, Vol. III, Pg 182)
t2 = (dz + wz ) / 90 = (db -2tst + dc - 2kc) / 90 =
0.44
in
tReqD ,
a doubler plate is
5.5
Since twc =
not required.
0.98
in
>
4. CBC : "2001 California Building Code, Volume 2", International Conference of Building Officials, 2001.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Special Moment Resisting Frames Based on AISC Seismic - LRFD
COLUMN SECTION
=>
W14X426
A
125
d
18.7
tw
1.88
bf
tf
Sx
16.70
3.04
706
= > W36X150
Ix
6600
rx
7.27
ry
4.35
Zx
869
k
3.63
A
44.2
d
35.9
tw
0.63
bf
12.00
Ix
9040
rx
14.30
ry
2.47
Zx
581
k
1.69
BEAM SECTION
tf
0.94
Sx
504
Fy =
50
ksi
THE SMRF DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
THE FACTOR GRAVITY LOAD ON THE BEAM
wu =
0.25
klf
(Continuity column stiffeners 1 x 8
THE FACTOR AXIAL LOAD ON THE COLUMN

Pu =
L=
h=
800
30
12
kips
ft
ft

REDUCED SECTION DIMENSIONS
a=
in, [0.5~0.75bf]
b=
25
in, [0.65~0.85db]
c=
2.5
in, [ < 0.25bf]
r = (4c + b ) / 8c =
32.5
in
Sh = dc/2 + a + b/2 =
28.9
in
ANALYSIS
CHECK BEAM LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATIONS (AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. I-8-1)

bf / (2tf ) =
6.38
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
[ 52 / (Fy)
Where
h / tw =
52.03
0.5
7.22
Es =
29000 ksi
2.45 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
[Satisfactory]
for AISC Seismic 97, Tab. I-9-1]

59.00
[Satisfactory]
[ 418 / (Fy)0.5 for FEMA Sec. 3.3.1.2]

CHECK COLUMN LOCAL BUCKING LIMITATIONS (AISC Seiemic 02 Tab. I-8-1)
bf / (2tf ) =
2.75
0.3 (Es / Fy)0.5 =
<
7.22
[Satisfactory]

3.14(Es/Fy)0.5(1-1.54Pu/bPy) =
h / tw =
<
6.09
N/A

1.12(Es/Fy)0.5(2.33-Pu/bPy) =
59.01 , for Pu/bPy > 0.125
Where b =
[Satisfactory]
0.9
, Py = FyA =
6250
kips
CHECK BEAM - COLUMN RATIO REQUIREMENT (AISC Seiemic 02 Sec. 9.6, Pg. 16)
Mpc* / (Mpb* ) =
Where
2.41
>
1.00
Mpc* = Nc Zc (Fyc - Pu / Ag ) =
Nc =
Mpb* = Nb (MRBS + Mv) =

Nb =
[Satisfactory]
6315 ft-kips
2623 ft-kips, at center of column
Mv = VRBS Sh = [2MRBS /(L-2Sh)+wu(L-2Sh)/2] Sh=

MRBS = CprRyFyb ZRBS =
Ry =
1.1
2196
1.15
ft-kips
2663
ft-kips
ZRBS = Zb - 2c tf (d - tf) =
Cpr =
427
ft-kips
417
in3
(FEMA Sec. 3.5.5.1)
CHECK BENDING MOMENT AT THE COLUMN FACE (FEMA Sec. 3.5.5.1)

Mf = MRBS + [2MRBS / (L - 2Sh) + wu(L - 2Sh)/2] (a + b/2)
=
2485
ft-kips
<
RyFyb Zb =
[Satisfactory]
CHECK CONTINUITY PLATE REQUIREMENT (FEMA Sec. 3.3.3.1)

tcf = MIN{ bbf / 6 , 0.4[1.8bbf tbf (FybRyb) / (FybRyb)] 0.5 }=
1.80
in
<
actual tcf
(The continuity plates may not be required.)
bst =
<
in
cPn,st = cFcr A =
Where
95 / (Fyst )0.5 tst =
0.94
in,
15.83
in, (LRFD Sec. K1.9)

[Satisfactory]
USE
1.00
in, ( 1 in )
788.2 kips
c =
0.85
hst = dc - 2k =
K =
0.75
K hst / rst < 200
(LRFD B2)
11.44
[Satisfactory]
I = tst (2bst + twc) 3 / 12 =
383
in4
c =
0.025
(LRFD E2-4, Pg 6-47)
A = 2bsttst + 25(twc) 2 =
26
in2
Fcr =
35.99
ksi (LRFD Sec.E2, Pg 6-47)
rst = ( I / A )
Pu,st = Ryb Fyb bfb tfb =
0.5
3.86 in
620.4 kips
<
cPn,st
[Satisfactory]
(Cont'd)

> wMIN =
w=
3/4
in
< wMAX =
0.3125 in
0.9375 in
[Satisfactory]
Lw = 0.6tstLnstFy / [(2) Fw (0.707 w)]
Where
= (1 x 8.4) x 36 / [(2) 0.75 (0.6x70)(0.707x3/4)] =
Lnet = dc - 2(kc + 1.5) =
<
8.4
3.86
CHECK PANEL ZONE THICKNESS REQUIREMENT (AISC Sec. 9.3 & FEMA Sec. 3.3.3.2)
1.08
in
t1 = Cy Mc (h - db ) / [0.9 (0.6) Fyc Ryc dc (db - tfb) h] =

Where
Cy = Sb / (Cpr ZRBS) =
0.88
Sb = 2Ib / db =
424
12
2
2623
7604
1.88
in
in
ft-kips
t2 = (dz + wz ) / 90 = (db -2tst + dc - 2k) / 90 =

Since twc =
not required.
in
in2
Ib = Ix - (2 c tfb)(0.5db - 0.5tfb) =
Mc = Mpb* =
1.08
>
0.50
in
tReqD ,
a doubler plate is
in
2(Lnet -0.5) [Satisfactory]
2. AISC: "Manual of Steel construction, LRFD, 2th", American Institute of Steel Construction, 1998.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Seismic Design for Special Moment Resisting Frames Based on CBC 2001 - ASD
COLUMN SECTION
=>
W14X211
A
62
d
15.7
tw
0.98
bf
tf
Sx
15.80
1.56
338
= > W30X108
Ix
2660
rx
6.55
ry
4.08
Zx
390
k
2.16
A
31.7
d
29.8
tw
0.55
bf
10.50
Ix
4470
rx
11.87
ry
2.15
Zx
346
k
1.41
BEAM SECTION
tf
0.76
Sx
299
Fy =
50
ksi
THE SMRF DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
THE GRAVITY LOAD (1.2D + 0.5 L) ON THE BEAM

wg =
=
2
28
klf
ft
(Continuity column stiffeners 13/16 x 7

COLUMN AXIAL LOAD AT SERVICE LEVEL
D=
L=
113
75
kips
kips
Eh =
5.5
kips (CBC 30A-1)
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
REDUNDANCY FACTOR
Ca =
I=
=
0.44
1.15
1.25
(CBC Tab. 16A-Q)

(CBC Tab. 16A-K)
h=
12
ft
REDUCED SECTION DIMENSIONS
a=
in, [0.5~0.75bf]
b=
24
in, [0.65~0.85db]
c=
2.25
in, [ < 0.25bf]
r = (4c2 + b2 ) / 8c =
33.1
in
Sh = dc/2 + a + b/2 =
25.9
in
ANALYSIS
CHECK BEAM LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (CBC 2213A.7.3)

bf / (2tf ) =
6.91
d / tw =
54.68
<
<
52 / (Fy)0.5 =
7.35
[Satisfactory]
640 / (Fy)0.5 =
90.51
[Satisfactory]
CHECK BEAM BRACING LIMITATION (CBC 2213A.7.8)

Smax = 96ry =
17.17
ft
Hence, both flanges of beam shall be braced at maximum spacing 17.17 ft.
CHECK COLUMN LOCAL BUCKLING LIMITATION (CBC 2213A.7.3 & ASD N7, Pg 5-96)
bf / (2tf ) =
5.06
<
7.00
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE ALLOWABLE COLUMN DESIGN LOADS (CBC 1612A.3.1, 2213A.8.2, & 2213A.8.4.1)
Pt = 0.9D - (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
76
kips (Compression)
Pc = D + 0.75[L + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4] =

Pc = D + (Eh + 0.5CaID) / 1.4 =
138
188
kips (Compression)
CHECK BEAM - COLUMN RATIO REQUIREMENT (CBC2213A.7.5)

Mpc* / (Mpb* ) =
>
( If
Where
2.02
1.25
>
1.00
Mpc* = Nc Zc (Fyc - Pc / Ag ) =
Nc =
2
1
3053 ft-kips
CBC 2213A.7.7.1)
Mpb* = Nb (MRBS + Mv) =

Nb =
[Satisfactory]
The column flanges need to be laterally supported only at the beam top flange.
1509 ft-kips, at center of column
Mv = VRBS Sh = [2MRBS /(L-2Sh)+wg(L -2Sh)/2] Sh=

MRBS = Fyb ZRBS =
1233
275
ft-kips
ft-kips
3
ZRBS = Zb - 2c tf (d - tf) =
247 in
=
1.2
(FEMA Sec. 7.5.2.2)
CHECK BENDING MOMENT AT THE COLUMN FACE (CBC2213A.4.2)

Mf = MRBS + [2MRBS / (L - 2Sh) + wg(L - 2Sh)/2] (a + b/2)
=
1425
ft-kips
<
Fyb Zb =
1442
DETERMINE COLUMN DESIGN LOADS (CBC 2213A.5.1)

Pt = 0.85D - 0Eh =
81
Pc = D + 0.7L + 0Eh =
Where
0 =
kips (Compression)
181
2.8
(CBC Tab. 16A-N)
ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
(Cont'd)
CHECK COLUMN COMPRESSION CAPACITY (CBC 2213A.4.2 & ASD E2)

Pc,allow = 1.7FaA =
Where
2789.9
K =
1.0
Es =
29000
2
0.5
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
>
kips
ksi
Fa =
107
MAX(K x/rx, K y/ry) =
35.33
F = (K / r) / Cc =
0.33
Pc
<
[Satisfactory]
200
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
2
26.47 kis, for Cc > (K /r)
12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
N/A
0.81
in, ( 13/16 in )
[Satisfactory]
CHECK CONTINUITY PLATE REQUIREMENT (FEMA Sec. 3.3.3.1 & CBC 2213A.7.4)
bst =
>
in
bfb /3 - twc /2 =
Ast = [Pbf - Fyc twc(tfb + 5kc)] / Fyst =

Where
Pbf = 1.8 bfb tfb Fyb =

Fyst =
36
4.2156
0.76
3.01
in2, (ASD K1-9)
in,
USE
in, (ASD Sec. K1.8)
<
tst bst
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
718.2 kips, (CBC 2213A.7.4)

The best fillet weld size (ASD Sec.J2.2b)

> wMIN =
w=
1/2
in
< wMAX =
0.25
in
0.6875
in
[Satisfactory]
Lw = Pbf / [(2) 1.7 (0.3Fu )(0.707 w)]
= 718.2 / [(2) 1.7 (0.3x70)(0.707x1/2)] =
21.46 in
<
Where
Lnet = dc - 2(kc) =
2(Lnet) [Satisfactory]
11.4
CHECK PANEL ZONE THICKNESS REQUIREMENT (CBC 2213A.7.2)
0.61
in
t1 = Vz / (0.55Fycdc) - 3bfctfc2 / (dcdb) =

Where
0.61
in, (CBC 13A-1)
Vz = Nb [(0.8) Mf / (db - tfb/2) - (0.8)Mf / h] =

370.0 kips
(SEAOC Design Manual, Vol. III, Pg 182)
t2 = (dz + wz ) / 90 = (db -2tst + dc - 2kc) / 90 =

Since twc =
not required.
0.98
in
>
0.44
in
tReqD ,
a doubler plate is
28
4. CBC : "2001 California Building Code, Volume 2", International Conference of Building Officials, 2001.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Steel Beam Design with Gravity Loading Based on AISC-ASD 9th

BEAM SECTION
W18X40
=>
SLOPED DEAD LOADS

PROJECTED LIVE LOADS
=>
wDL,1 =
1.15
kips / ft
wDL,2 =
0.5
kips / ft
wLL,1 =
0.8
kips / ft
wLL,2 =
0.5
kips / ft
PDL =
kips
PLL =
kips
CONCENTRATED LOADS
BEAM SPAN LENGTH
L1 =
30
ft
CANTILEVER LENGTH
L2 =
10
ft, (0 for no cantilever)
(=
4 : 12
BEAM SLOPE
Fy =
BEAM YIELD STRESS
50
18.43
Ix
612
Sx
68.4
rT
1.52
bf
6.02
tf
0.53
tw
0.32
ksi

ANALYSIS
DETERMINE REACTIONS, MOMENTS & SHEARS
R 2 = 0.5
+
w DL ,1
w DL ,2
+ w LL ,1 L1 +
+ w LL ,2 ( L1 + 0.5 L 2 ) L 2 + P L1 L 2
cos
cos
L1
L1
=
R1 =
50.17
kips
w DL ,1
w DL ,2
+ w LL ,1 L1 +
+ w LL ,2 L 2 + P R 2
cos
cos
=
26.47
kips
X1 =
13.16
ft
X2 =
13.16
ft
X3 =
3.69
ft
w DL ,2
+ w LL ,2 L 22 + P L 2 =
M Min = 0.5
cos
( X 1+ X 2 ) =
w DL ,1
+ w LL ,1
cos
8
111.4 ft-kips
M Max =
V max =
39.89
174.1
ft-kips
kips, at R2 left.
CHECK M Min BENDING CAPACITY (AISC-ASD, F1.3, page 5-46)
l = Max ( L 2 , X 3 ) =
C b = 1.75 + 1.05
rT =
1.52
L c = MIN
76b f
Fy
L u = MAX r T
L3 = r T
10.00
M 1 + 0.3 M 1
M2
M2
in ,
= 1.75
510000C b
=
Fy
, since M1 is 0
Af =
20000
=
d
( / Af )F y
102000C b
Fy
ft, unbraced length
5.39
3.16
ft
12000C b
0.6 ( d / A f ) F y
16.92
ft
in
= 10.30
ft
(cont'd)
2
F y( l / r T )
F y , 0.6 F y =
3 1530000C b
2
F b1 = MIN
170000C b
F b 2 = MIN
( l / r )2
Fy
=
3
F b3 = MIN
16.7
12000C b
, 0.6 F y =
l (d / A f )
30.0
ksi
ksi
ksi
0.66 F y , for l L c
0.6 F y , for L c < l < L u
Fb =
27.5
MAX ( F b1 , F b3 ) , for L u l < L 3
30.0
ksi
MAX ( F b 2 , F b3 ) , for l L 3
f b = M Min / S x =
19.5
ksi
<
Fb
[Satisfactory]
CHECK LOCAL BUCKLING (AISC-ASD Tab. B5.1)

bf / (2tf ) =
5.73
65 / (Fy)0.5 =
<
9.19
[Satisfactory]
d / tw =
56.83
<
640 / (Fy)0.5 =
90.51
[Satisfactory]
CHECK M Max BENDING CAPACITY (AISC-ASD, F1.3, page 5-46)
f b = M Max / S x =
30.5
ksi
<
F b = 0.66 F y =
33.0
ksi
[Satisfactory]
<
F v = 0.4 F y =
20.0
ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (AISC-ASD, F4, page 5-49)

f v = V Max / t w d =
7.1
ksi
DETERMINE CAMBER AT DEAD LOAD CONDITION

L = L 1 / cos =
31.62
a = L 2 / cos =
10.54
ft, beam sloped span

ft, beam sloped cantilever length
P = P DL cos =
2.85
kips, perpendicualr to beam
w 1 = w DL,1 cos =
1.09
klf, perpendicualr to beam
w 2 = w DL,2 cos =
0.47
End =
P a 2 ( L + a ) w1 L 3a w 2 a 3 ( 4 L + 3a )
+
=
3EI
24 EI
24 EI
-0.69
in, uplift perpendicular to beam.

USE C = 3/4" AT CANTILEVER.
Mid
Pa L 2
w 4
w 2a 2
=
+ 1L 2 L
=
16 EI 384 EI
32 EI
0.25
in, downward perpendicular at middle of beam.

USE C = 1/4" AT MID BEAM.
CHECK DEFLECTION AT LIVE LOAD CONDITION

P = P LL cos =
2.85
kips, perpendicualr to beam
2
w 1 = w LL,1 cos =
0.72
2
w 2 = w LL,2 cos =
0.45
End
3 =
Pa 2 ( L + a )
w 2 a 3 ( 4 L + 3a )
w 3a
cos =
1L
+
3EI
24 EI
24 EI
<
Mid =
Pa L 2
w1 L 4
w 2a 2
+
2L
cos =
16 EI
384 EI
32 EI
<
0.14
-0.19
in, uplift to vertical direction.
2L 2 / 240 =
1.00
in
in, downward to vertical direction.
L 1 / 240 =
1.50
in
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Simply Supported Beam Design with Torsional Loading Based on AISC-ASD 9th
BEAM SECTION
GRAVITY DISTRIBUTED LOAD
= > W10X54
w = 1.15 kips / ft
F=
T=
P=
L =
5
5.1
96
15
kips
ft-kips
kips
ft
BEAM YIELD STRESS
Fy =
50
ksi
VERTICAL BENDING UNBRACED LENGTH
Lb =
15
ft
LATERAL POINT LOAD AT MID

TORSION AT MID SPAN
AXIAL LOAD
BEAM LENGTH
AXIAL VERTICAL UNBRACED LENGTH
Lx =
15
ft
AXIAL HORIZONTAL UNBRACED LENGTH
Ly =
7.5
ft
=>
A
15.8
d
10.1
rx
4.38
ry
2.55
Ix
303
Iy
103
Sy
20.6
0.0174
tw
0.37
bf
10.00
7.5
ANALYSIS
CHECK LOCAL BUCKLING (AISC-ASD Tab. B5.1)
bf / (2tf ) =
8.13
65 / (Fy)0.5 =
<
9.19
[Satisfactory]
d / tw =
<
27.30
640 / (Fy)0.5 =
90.51
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE GOVERNING MOMENTS AT MIDDLE OF SPAN
Mx = w L 2 / 8 =
32.3
ft-kips
My = F L / 4 =
18.8
ft-kips
M0 = T L / (4d) =
22.7
ft-kips
MT = M0 =
13.3
ft-kips
4 sinh
L 2
2
L sinh L
0.584
,(Philip page 101)
DETERMINE GOVERNING UNBALANCED SEGMENT LENGTH (AISC-ASD F1)

L c = MIN[76bf/(Fy)0.5 , 20000/(d/Af)Fy] =
8.96
ft
L u = MAX[rT(102000Cb/Fy)0.5 , 12000Cb/(d/Af)0.6Fy] =
L 3 = rT(510000Cb/Fy)0.5 =
Where
20.30
ft
22.39 ft
(d/Af) =
1.64
rT =
2.66
Cb =
1.00
in-1
DETERMINE ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESSES (AISC-ASD F1)
Fbx =
Where
0.66Fy
N/A
ksi, for L b @ [0, L c]
0.60Fy
30.00
ksi, for L b @ (L c, L u]
MAX(Fb1, Fb3)
N/A
ksi, for L b @ (L u, L 3]
MAX(Fb2, Fb3)
N/A
ksi, for L b @ (L 3, Larger)
Fb1 = MIN{[2/3 - Fy(L /rT)2/(1530000Cb)]Fy , 0.6Fy} =

Fb2 = MIN[170000Cb/(L /rT)2, Fy/3] =
16.67 ksi
Fb3 = MIN[12000Cb/(L d/Af), 0.6Fy] =
30.00 ksi
CHECK VERTICAL FLEXURAL CAPACITY (AISC-ASD F & Philip page 100)

fbx / Fbx =
Where
0.73
<
fbx = Mx / Sx + 2MT / Sy =
1.00
[Satisfactory]
21.93
ksi
25.85
ksi
Sx
60
tf
0.62
(cont'd)
CHECK COMPRESSION CAPACITY (AISC-ASD E2)
fa / Fa =
<
0.24
fa = P / A =
Where
K =
Es =
1.33
[Satisfactory]
6.08
ksi
1.0
29000
2
Cc = (2 Es/Fy)
0.5
ksi
Fa =
107
KL /r = MAX(KL x/rx, KL y/ry) =

F = (KL / r) / Cc =
41.10
<
1.33
<
(1-F2/2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F3/8) =
122Es/[23(KL /r)2] =
200
25.68 kis, for Cc > (K /r)

N/A
[Satisfactory]
0.38
CHECK COMBINED STRESS (AISC-ASD H1)

fa / Fa =
fa
Fa
>
0.24
C mx f bx
Where
fa
' F bx
F ex
Cm =
f
1 a F by
'
F ey
10.92
ksi
Fby = 0.75 Fy =
37.50
ksi
88.39
ksi
12 2E
f bx
F bx
1.33
1.00
23
0.6 F y
C my f by
fby = My / Sy =
'
F ex
fa
0.15
Klx
'
F ey
23
rx
f by
F by
f by
fa
f
+ bx +
=
Fa
F bx
F by
12 2E
1.22
<
1.33
1.26
<
1.33
Kl y
= 120.18 ksi
ry
<== Not applicable.
[Satisfactory]
2. Philip H. Lin: "Simplified Design for Torsional Loading of Rolled Steel Members", Engineering Journal, AISC, 1977.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Simply Supported Beam Design with Torsional Loading Based on AISC-LRFD 3rd
BEAM SECTION
=>
W10X54
=>
GRAVITY DISTRIBUTED LOAD
wu = 1.725 kips / ft
LATERAL POINT LOAD AT MID
Fu =
TORSION AT MID SPAN
Tu = 3.213 ft-kips
AXIAL LOAD
BEAM LENGTH
Pu =
L =
144
15
kips
ft
rx
ry
Ix
Sx
15.8
10.1
4.38
2.55
303
60
Sy
tw
bf
tf
20.6
0.0174
0.37
10.00
0.62
J
1.82
Cw
2310
Zx
66.6
Zy
31.3
kips
7.5
BEAM YIELD STRESS
Fy =
50
ksi
VERTICAL BENDING UNBRACED LENGTH
Lb =
15
ft
AXIAL VERTICAL UNBRACED LENGTH
Lx =
15
ft
AXIAL HORIZONTAL UNBRACED LENGTH
Ly =
7.5
ft
Iy
103
E
G
29000 11200
ANALYSIS
CHECK LOCAL BUCKLING (AISC-LRFD Tab. B5.1)
bf / (2tf ) =
0.38 (E / Fy)0.5 =
<
8.13
9.15
96
[Satisfactory]
d / tw =
3.76 (E / Fy)0.5 =
<
27.30
90.55
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE GOVERNING MOMENTS AT MIDDLE OF SPAN
Mu,x = wu L 2/ 8 =
48.5
ft-kips
Mu,y = Fu L / 4 =
28.1
ft-kips
M0,u = Tu L / (4d) =
14.3
ft-kips
Mu,T = M0,u =
8.4
ft-kips
4 sinh
L 2
2
L sinh L
0.584
,(Philip page 101)
DETERMINE GOVERNING UNBALANCED SEGMENT LENGTH (AISC-LRFD F1)

L p = 1.76 ry (E / Fyf)0.5 =
9.02
L r = ry X1 [1 + (1 + X2 FL2 )0.5 ]0.5 / FL =

Where
ft
30.08
X 1 = (0.5 E G J A)0.5 / Sx =
3578.1
X 2 = 4 Cw [Sx / (G J)]2 / Iy =
0.0008
Fr =
10.00
ft
ksi
40.00
ksi

277.5
M r = FL S x =
ft-kips
200.0
ft-kips
M cr = Cb Sx ry X1 (2 + X12 X2 ry2 / Lb2)0.5 / Lb =

Where
Mn
Cb =
1.14
578.8
ft-kips
Mp
N/A
277.50 ft-kips, for L b @ (L p , L r]
MIN(Mcr , Mp)
N/A
b M n,x
= 0.9 Mn =
b M n,y
= 0.9 MIN( Fy Zy , 1.5 Fy Sy) =
249.75
>
ft-kips
M u,x
>
115.88 ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
M u,y
[Satisfactory]
CHECK COMPRESSION CAPACITY (AISC-LRFD E2)
Pn
Where
= 0.85 Ag Fcr =
c = (KL /r) (Fy / E)
K =
1.0
F cr
593.5
ft-kips
KL /r = MAX(KL x/rx, KL y/ry) =
0.5
/=
41.10
>
<
Pu
[Satisfactory]
200
[Satisfactory]
0.54
[0.658(c c)] Fy
44.19
ksi, for c
(0.877 / c2) Fy
N/A
ksi, for c > 1.5
1.5
ft-kips, for L b @ [0 , L p]
(cont'd)
CHECK COMBINED BENDING AND AXIAL CAPACITY (AISC-LRFD H1)
Pu / Pn + (8/9) (Mu,x / bMn,x + Mu,y / bMn,y) =
0.63
, for Pu / Pn
Pu / 2Pn + (Mu,x / bMn,x + Mu,y / bMn,y) =
N/A
, for Pu / Pn < 0.2
0.2
<
1.00
[Satisfactory]
CHECK TORSION STRESS AND COMBINED BENDING, AXIAL FORCE (AISC-LRFD H2 & Philip page 100)
f un = Pu / A + Mu,x / Sx + (Mu,y + 2Mu,T) / Sy =
44.94
ksi
<
fn = 0.9 Fy =
[Satisfactory]
45.00
1. AISC: "Manual of Steel construction, LRFD 3rd", American Institute of Steel Construction, 2001.
2. Philip H. Lin: "Simplified Design for Torsional Loading of Rolled Steel Members", Engineering Journal, AISC, 1977.
ksi
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Plate Girder Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th, Chapter G

STEEL YIELD STRESS
Fy =
50
ksi
=
=
=
=
72
1
1
60
ft
kips / ft
kips / ft
kips
S
DL
LL
P DL
SIMPLY SUPPORTED SPAN

SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM DEAD LOAD
UNIFORM LIVE LOAD
POINT DEAD LOAD
P LL =
60
kips
TOP FLANGE WIDTH
b f,top =
16
in
TOP FLANGE THICKNESS
t f,top =
1.5
in
BOTTOM FLANGE WIDTH
b f,bot =
16
in
BOTTOM FLANGE THICKNESS
t f,bot =
1.5
in
POINT LIVE LOAD
t w = 0.375 in
d =
53
in
c =
24
ft
l =
8
ft
WEB THICKNESS
BEAM DEPTH
DISTANCE POINT LOAD TO END
UNBRACED LENGTH
1/4 x 7 STIFFENER, E. SIDES, AT SUPPORTS & POINT LOAD.

FLANGE TO WEB WELDING USE 1/4 in - 24 in @ 32 in o.c.
THE GIRDER DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
DETERMINE Fb (AISC-ASD, F1.3, page 5-46)
C b = 1.75 + 1.05
rT =
L c = MIN
76b f
Fy
L u = MAX r T
L3 = r T
24.00 in
Af =
20000
(d / A f ) F y
4l 2 S 2
4 2 2
+ 0.3 l S
S2
S2
1.75 + 1.05
in
4.34
M 1 + 0.3 M 1
M2
M2
14.33
36.98
1.02
ft
102000C b
12000C b
= 16.54
,
0.6 ( d / A f ) F y
Fy
510000C b
=
Fy
ft
ft
2 F y( l / r T )
F y , 0.6 F y =
3 1530000C b
F b1 = MIN
170000C b
F b 2 = MIN
(l / r )
F b3 = MIN
Fb =
Fy
=
3
30.0
16.7
12000C b
, 0.6 F y =
l (d / A f )
30.0
ksi
ksi
ksi
0.66 F y , for l L c
0.6 F y , for L c < l < L u
MAX ( F b1 , F b3 ) , for L u l < L 3
33.0
ksi
MAX ( F b 2 , F b3 ) , for l L 3
CHECK WEB SLENDERNESS (AISC-ASD, G1, page 5-51)
a =
h / tw =
47.4
133.33
ft, the max clear distance between stiffeners.
>
760
Fb
132.30
14000
<
F yf ( F yf + 16.5 )
2000
F yf
[Satisfactory]
for a > 1.5h
for a 1.5h
282.84
[Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
DETERMINE ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRESS (AISC-ASD G2, pg 5-51)
Aw =
in2
18.75
R PG = MIN 1 0.0005
12 +
R e = MIN
= 0.6 F yw / F b =
A w h 760
0.375
Af t
Fb
( 3 3)
Aw
Af
12 + 2 A w
Af
'
F b = F b R PG R e =
32.94
, 1.0 =
0.91
1.000
0.999
, 1.0 =
ksi
DETERMINE ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS (F4-2, pg 5-49)

h = d - t f,top - t f,bot =
4.0+
kv
5.34
(a / h)
5.34+
Fv
= MIN
h / tw =
133
45000 k v
, for a / h1.0
4.0
(a / h)
in
50
5.37
Cv
P = PDL + PLL =
120.00
, for a / h >1.0
CvF y
, 0.4 F
2.89
TOTAL SUPERIMPOSED GRAVITY LOAD

w = DL + LL =
2.000 kips / ft
( h / t w )2
190
h /tw
, for C v 0.8
k v , for
C v >0.8
Fy
0.47
8.08 ksi
kips
CHECK EACH SECTION CAPACITIES

Section
Distance
d (in)
y (in)
Left
0
53
27
0.06 S
4.00
53
27
0.11 S
8.00
53
27
0.17 S
12.00
53
27
0.22 S
16.00
53
27
0.28 S
20.00
53
27
Point
24.00
53
27
0.44 S
32.00
53
27
0.56 S
40.00
53
27
0.67 S
48.00
53
27
0.78 S
56.00
53
27
0.89 S
64.00
53
27
Right
72.00
53
27
I (in4)
Wt (plf)
V (kips)
M (ft-k)
f v (ksi)
35742
227.1
160.18
0
35742
227.1
151.27
623
35742
227.1
142.36
1210
35742 35742 35742

227.1
227.1
227.1
133.45 124.54 115.63
1762
2278
2758
35742
227.1
0.00
3203
35742
227.1
31.09
3025
35742
227.1
48.91
2705
35742
227.1
66.73
2243
35742
227.1
84.54
1638
35742
227.1
102.36
890
35742
227.1
120.18
0
8.06
7.61
7.16
6.71
6.27
5.82
0.00
1.56
2.46
3.36
4.25
5.15
6.05
f b (ksi)
0.00
5.54
10.77
15.67
20.27
24.54
28.50
26.92
24.07
19.95
14.57
7.92
0.00
0.00
BENDING STRESS
fb (ksi) & F'b (ksi)
-5.00
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
-30.00
-35.00
Length
f b,max =
28.50 ksi
<
@
F' b =
24.00 ft, from heel.

32.94 ksi
[Satisfactory]
fv (ksi) & Fv (ksi)
SHEAR STRESS
0.00
-5.00
-10.00
Length
(cont'd)
f v,max =
8.06 ksi
<
0.00
Fv =
ft, from heel.
8.08 ksi
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE DEFLECTION AT MID SPAN
DL
3/ 2
5w L 4
0.06415 Pb
+
( L 2 b 2 ) =
384 EI
EIL
where
LL
E=
29000
I=
b=
35742
24.6
1.40
in ( L / 619 )
(for camber, self Wt included.)
ksi
in4
ft
3/ 2
5w L 4
0.06415 Pb
+
( L 2 b 2 ) =
384 EI
EIL
where
60
P=
w=
1.227
kips / ft
P=
L=
60
72.0
kips
ft
1.26
kips
in ( L / 684 )
1.000
w=
kips / ft
DETERMINE FLANGE TO WEB WELDING

w =
w min =
1/4
3/16
in
in, < w
w max =
5/16
in, > w
V max =
160.18
kips
Q = A f (d - y - 0.5 t f,top ) =
v max = V max Q / I =
A=
24
in
618
2.77
kips / in
B=
in
( 0.3F u ) ( 0.707 w) A =
32
v max
in. o.c.
USE 1/4 in - 24 in @ 32 in o.c.

DESIGN STIFFENERS
1. BEARING STIFFENERS ARE REQUIRED AT EACH END SUPPORT. (AISC-ASD, K1.8, page 5-82)
2. CHECK LOCAL WEB YIELDING FOR THE CONCENTRATED LOAD. (AISC-ASD, K3, page 5-81)
R=P=
120.00 kips
N=
0
in, bearing length, point.
k = t f,top + w =
1.75
in
R
, for c > d
t w ( N + 5k )
R
, for c d
t w ( N + 2.5 k )
>
36.57
[Unsatisfactory]
0.66F y
(BEARING STIFFENERS MUST BE PROVIDED.)
3. CHECK WEB CRIPPLING FOR THE CONCENTRATED LOAD. (AISC-ASD, K4, page 5-81)
67.5t 2w 1+ 3
N
d
R =
34 t 2w 1+ 3
N
d
tw
tf
tw
tf
1.5
yw t f
tw
1.5
yw t f
tw
, for c 0.5 d
134.24
>
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
, for c < 0.5 d
(Note : If item 2, local web yielding is Satisfactory, this item does not need to be checked.)
4. CHECK SIDESWAY WEB BUCKING FOR THE CONCENTRATED LOAD. (AISC-ASD, K5, page 5-81)
d c = d - 2k =
49.50
(d c / t w ) / (l / b f ) =
6800t 3w
/
0.4 d c t w
h
l /b f
R =
in
22.00
3
6800t 3w
/
1+ 0.4 d c t w
h
l /b f
/
, for d c t w <1.7
l /b f
3
/
, for 1.7 d c t w < 2.3
l /b f
120.00
>
/
P , for d c t w 2.3
l /b f
(Note : If item 2, local web yielding is Satisfactory, this item does not need to be checked.)
(cont'd)
5. DETERMINE STIFFENER SIZE.
tw =
in
5/8
b st / t w =
11.20
A eff =
10.44
in
fa =
15.3
ksi
Es =
29000
ksi
b st =
0.5
1
Fa =
0.5
in
< 95 / Fy , AISC-ASD, B5.1

[Satisfactory]
4
I =
155 in
K / r = 0.75 h / ( I / A eff ) 0.5 =

C c = (2 E s / F y )
9.7
107
( kl / r ) 2
Fy
2C c2
5 3 ( kl / r ) ( kl / r )
+
3
8C c
8C 3c
12 2E
23( kl / r )
for
for
kl
Cc
r
kl
> Cc
r
29.3
ksi, (AISC-ASD, E2, page 5-42)
>
fa
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Web Tapered Girder Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th, Appendix F

STEEL YIELD STRESS
Fy =

SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
S = 84.67 ft
DL = 0.48 kips / ft
LL = 0.288 kips / ft
36
ksi
FLANGE WIDTH
bf =
FLANGE THICKNESS
t f = 0.625 in
12
in
WEB THICKNESS
t w = 0.3125 in
HEEL DEPTH
d0 =
22
in
MID-SPAN DEPTH
DISTANCE BETWEEN STIFFENERS
dL =
a =
60
7.2
in
ft
L =
UNBRACED LENGTH / PURLIN SPACING
7.2 ft
(Diaphragm is not bracing member. L is different with " l " in F1.3, pg 5-47)

ANALYSIS
w = DL + LL =
0.768 kips / ft
ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRESS (APP. F7.14, pg 5-103)
Fy
2
1.0
F y 0.60 F y , for F b > F y / 3
3
6 B F 2s + F 2w
F b =
B
where
F 2s +F 2w
21.60 ksi
, for F b F y / 3
Af =
in2
7.50
= MIN[(dL - d0) / d0 , 0.268 L/d0, 6.0] =

A To = tf bf + d0 tw / 6 =
1.05
in2
8.65
I To = (tf bf3 + d0 tw3 / 6) / 12 =

I To =
ATo
3.23
r To
hs
= 1.0 + 0.0230
in
Ld 0 =
Af
L
h w = 1.0 + 0.00385
in4
90
r To
12000
34.18 ksi
192.93 ksi
F s
1.39 in
F w
1.11 in
1.75
=
1.0+ 0.25
h sL d o / A f
170000
( h wL / r To )
1.37
ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS (F4, pg 5-49)
Fv =
where
0.4 F y , for h / t w380 F y
CvF y
0.4 F y , for h / t w>380 F y
2.89
h = dL - 2 tf =
h / tw =
4.0+
kv
59
188
(a / h)
5.34+
in
>
5.34
2
4.0
( a / h )2
5.63 ksi
380 / F y 0.5 =
Cv
, for a / h1.0
=
, for a / h >1.0
45000 k v
63
7.19
( h / t w )2
190
h /tw
, for C v 0.8
k v , for
C v >0.8
Fy
0.45
(cont'd)
Section
Distance
d (in)
HEEL
0
22
1/24 S
3.53
25
1/12 S
7.06
28
1/8 S
10.58
32
1/6 S
14.11
35
5/24 S
17.64
38
1/4 S
21.17
41
7/24 S
24.70
44
1/3 S
28.22
47
3/8 S
31.75
51
5/12 S
35.28
54
11/24 S MID
38.81 42.34
57
60
I (in4)
Wt (plf)
V (kips)
M (ft-k)
f v (ksi)
2092
73.1
36.46
0
2790
76.5
33.49
123
3603
79.8
30.51
236
4535
83.2
27.51
339
5592
86.6
24.50
430
6778
89.9
21.48
511
8099
93.3
18.45
582
9559
96.7
15.40
642
11163
100.0
12.34
691
12917
103.4
9.28
729
14826
106.8
6.20
756
5.30
4.26
3.45
2.79
2.26
1.82
1.44
1.12
0.83
0.59
0.37
0.17
0.00
f b (ksi)
0.00
6.68
11.15
14.11
16.01
17.13
17.68
17.79
17.57
17.09
16.42
15.59
14.64
16893
110.1
3.10
772
19125
113.5
0.00
778
BENDING STRESS
0.00
-fb (ksi)
-5.00
-10.00
-15.00
-Fb
-20.00
-25.00
Length
f b,max =
17.79 ksi
<

Fb =
21.60 ksi
[Satisfactory]
SHEAR STRESS
0.00
-fv (ksi)
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
-4.00
-Fv
-5.00
-6.00
Length
f v,max =
5.30 ksi
<
0.00
Fv =
ft, from heel.
5.63 ksi
[Satisfactory]
DL
S
0
m DL mun it ds =
EIs
LL
2.10 in ( Span / 484 )

ksi
S
0
m LL mun it ds =
EIs
1.05 in ( Span / 971 )
where
Section
Distance
I S (in4)
E=
HEEL
0.00
2092
29000
1/24 S
3.53
2790
mDL (ft-k)
82
157
226
287
341
388
428
461
487
505
516
520
mLL (ft-k)
41
79
113
143
170
194
213
229
242
251
256
258
1/12 S
7.06
3603
1/8 S
10.58
4535
1/6 S
14.11
5592
5/24 S
17.64
6778
1/4 S
21.17
8099
7/24 S
24.70
9559
1/3 S
28.22
11163
3/8 S
31.75
12917
5/12 S
35.28
14826
11/24 S MID
38.81 42.34
16893 19125
munit
0.00
1.76
3.53
5.29
7.06
8.82
10.58
12.35
14.11
15.88
17.64
19.40
21.17
DL,S
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.13
0.12
LL,S
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Web Tapered Girder Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th, Appendix F

Fy =
36
ksi
S =
90
ft
NUMBER OF CONCENTRATED LOADS

SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD
n=
PD =
8
4.8
( @ 10.0 ft o.c.)
kips
LIVE LOAD
PL =
2.88
kips
STEEL YIELD STRESS

FLANGE WIDTH
bf =
FLANGE THICKNESS
tf =
12
in
0.625 in
WEB THICKNESS
t w = 0.3125 in
HEEL DEPTH
d0 =
22
in
MID-SPAN DEPTH
DISTANCE BETWEEN STIFFENERS
dL =
a =
60
7.2
in
ft
L =
UNBRACED LENGTH / PURLIN SPACING
7.2 ft
(Diaphragm is not bracing member. L is different with " l " in F1.3, pg 5-47)

ANALYSIS
P = PD + PL =
7.680 kips @ 10.0 ft o.c.
0.288
ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRESS (APP. F7.14, pg 5-103)
Fy
2
1.0
F y 0.60 F y , for F b > F y / 3
3
6 B F 2s + F 2w
F b =
21.60 ksi
B F 2s +F 2w , for F b F y / 3
where
Af =
in2
7.50
= MIN[(dL - d0) / d0 , 0.268 L/d0, 6.0] =

A To = tf bf + d0 tw / 6 =
3
1.05
in2
8.65
I To = (tf bf + d0 tw / 6) / 12 =
I To =
ATo
3.23
r To
hs
= 1.0 + 0.0230
in
Ld 0 =
Af
h w = 1.0 + 0.00385
in
90
r To
12000
34.18 ksi
192.93 ksi
F s
1.39 in
F w
1.11 in
1.75
=
1.0 +0.25
h sL d o / A f
170000
( h wL / r To )
1.37
ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS (F4, pg 5-49)
Fv =
where
0.4 F y , for h / t w380 F y
Cv F y
0.4 F y , for h / t w>380 F y
2.89
h = dL - 2 tf =
h / tw =
4.0+
kv
59
188
( a / h)
5.34+
in
>
5.34
2
4.0
( a / h )2
5.63 ksi
380 / F y 0.5 =
Cv
, for a / h1.0
=
, for a / h >1.0
45000 k v
63
7.19
( h / t w)2
190
h /tw
, for C v0.8
k v , for
C v >0.8
Fy
0.45
(cont'd)
Section
Distance
d (in)
HEEL
0
22
1/18 S
5.00
26
2/18 S
10.00
30
3/18 S
15.00
35
4/18 S
20.00
39
5/18 S
25.00
43
6/18 S
30.00
47
7/18 S
35.00
52
8/18 S
40.00
56
MID
45.00
60
I (in )
Wt (plf)
V (kips)
M (ft-k)
2092
73.1
34.92
0
3048
77.6
34.54
174
4211
82.1
26.46
345
5592
86.6
26.04
477
7203
91.1
17.92
606
9056
95.6
17.45
694
11163
100.0
9.28
780
13536
104.5
8.77
825
16186
109.0
0.56
868
19125
113.5
0.00
869
f v (ksi)
5.08
4.22
2.78
2.40
1.47
1.30
0.63
0.54
0.03
f b (ksi)
0.00
8.96
14.98
17.73
19.62
19.83
19.85
18.86
17.94
12
16
0.00
16.36
20
25
30
BENDING STRESS
0.00
-fb (ksi)
-5.00
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
Length
f b,max =
19.85 ksi
<
Fb =

21.60 ksi
[Satisfactory]
SHEAR STRESS
0.00
-fv (ksi)
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
-4.00
-5.00
-6.00
Length
f v,max =
5.08 ksi
<
Fv =
0.00
ft, from heel.
5.63 ksi
[Satisfactory]
DL
where
Section
Distance
I S (in4)
S
0
m DL mun it ds =
EIs
LL
2.21 in ( Span / 489 )

S
0
m LL mun it ds =
EIs
1.79 in ( Span / 605 )
E=
HEEL
0.00
2092
29000
1/18 S
5.00
3048
ksi
mDL (ft-k)
116
230
304
375
406
435
422
407
351
mLL (ft-k)
58
115
173
230
288
346
403
461
518
2/18 S
10.00
4211
3/18 S
15.00
5592
4/18 S
20.00
7203
5/18 S
25.00
9056
6/18 S
30.00
11163
7/18 S
35.00
13536
8/18 S
40.00
16186
MID
45.00
19125
munit
0.00
2.50
5.00
7.50
10.00
12.50
15.00
17.50
20.00
22.50
DL,S
0.00
0.01
0.06
0.10
0.14
0.16
0.17
0.17
0.16
0.14
LL,S
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.08
0.11
0.13
0.15
0.16
0.18
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Composite Beam Design with Verco Floor Deck Based on AISC-ASD

BEAM SECTION
=>
W12X16
FLOOR DECK TYPE
=>
W3-5" NW
RIBS PERPENDICULAR TO BEAM ?

BEAM SPAN
BEAM SPACING (DECK SPAN)
=>
SUPERIMPOSED LOAD
Yes (perpendicular)
L = 22.17 ft
B = 8.25 ft, o.c.
lbs / ft2
ws =
80
BEAM YIELD STRESS
Fy =
50
ksi
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'=
ksi
5/8
in
SHEAR STUD DIA. (1/2, 5/8, 3/4)
NUMBER OF STUD IN ONE RIB
Nr =
A
4.71
d
12.0
Ix
103
Sx
17.1
( Total 9 - 3/4 x 4.5" Shear Studs Required)

ANALYSIS
CHECK DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS (AISC-ASD I5.1, page 5-61)
t0 =
in
>
in
[Satisfactory]
hr =
in
<
in
[Satisfactory]
3/4
in
<
3/4
in
[Satisfactory]
H s = h r + 1.5 =
s =
33
4.5
in o.c.
in
<
3
in o.c.
in
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
wr =
in
>
>
36
in
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE COMPOSITE PROPERTIES

b = MIN ( L / 4 , B ) =
E
n =
Ec
66.51
9.29
A ctr = b t 0 / n =
, (ACI 8.5.1)
in2
14.3
Actr ( d + h r + 0.5t 0 )+ 0.5 Ad

=
Actr + A
yb =
I tr = I x + A( y b 0.5d ) +
2
I tr
S tr =
yb
( d + hr + t 0 yb )
Bottom:
Top:
Shear:
fb =
fc =
fv =
wB L 2
8
M max
S tr
1.7 M max
nS t
1.7V max
bt 0
in, from steel bottom.
2
Actr t 02
+ Actr ( 0.5t 0 + h r + d y b ) =
12
133
CHECK BENDING & SHEAR CAPACITIES

w = w s + w wt =
80.00
M max =
13.5
in4
462
in3, refered to steel bottom.
34
I tr
St =
in, (AISC-ASD I1.1, page 5-56)
in3, refered to concrete top.
42.30
62
ft-kips, (changeable).
22
ksi
1.024
ksi
<
0.9 F y =
[Satisfactory]
<
0.45 f c ' =
122.30
lbs / ft2 (total gravity loads)
V max =
wBL
2
11
kips, (changeable per actual).
45
ksi, (non-shored, AISC-ASD I2.2, page 5-57)
1.35
ksi, (AISC-ASD I2.2, page 5-57)
[Satisfactory]
0.143
ksi
<
2 bt 0 f 'c = 2(0.85)bt 0 f 'c = 12.386 ksi
[Satisfactory]
(neglecting steel capacity conservativly)
(cont'd)
CHECK SHEAR CONNECTOR CAPACITY
'
V h = MIN 0.85 f c Ac / 2
S eff = M max / (0.66 F y ) =
205
wr
hr
Nr
0.85
wr
0.6
hr
117.75 kips, (AISC-ASD I4-1 & I4-2, page 5-58)
, 0.25 V h =
Hs
1.0
hr
Hs
1.0
hr
q' = q =
F y As / 2 =
23
S eff S s
S tr S s
V 'h = MAX
9.78
29.44 kips, (AISC-ASD I2-1 & I4, page 5-57 & 58)
, for Perpendicular
=
0.850
< 1.0
, (AISC-ASD I5-1, page 5-61)
, for Parallel
kips, (AISC-ASD I5.2, page 5-61)
Allowable Horizontal Shear Load for One Connector (q, kips)

(AISC-ASD Table I4.1 with cofficient Table I4.2, page 5-59)
Dia.
Concrete fc'
min. Hs
0.500
0.625
0.750
( in )
1/2
5/8
3/4
( in )
2
2 1/2
3
3.0
5.1
8.0
11.5
3.5
5.5
8.6
12.5
4.0 or Larger
5.9
9.2
13.3
2 N 1 ' = 2 V h ' / q' =
, total number on the beam for partical composite action.
2 N 1 = 2 V h / q' =
25
, total number on the beam for full composite action.
n = MAX(2N 1 ' , 2N 1 /4) =
, total number required on the beam, (AISC-ASD I4, page 5-59)
2. Alan Williams Ph.D., S.E., C.Eng.: "Structural Steel Design - Volume 1: ASD", ICBO, 2001.
6778
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Composite Beam Design with Formed Steel Deck Based on AISC-ASD

BEAM SECTION
BEAM SPAN
BEAM SPACING (DECK SPAN)
W21X62
40
ft
11
ft, o.c.
2
w=
205 lbs / ft
yes (perpendicular)
=>
=>
A
18.3
L =
B =
TOTAL GRAVITY LOAD (DL+LL)

RIBS PERPENDICULAR TO BEAM ?
BEAM YIELD STRESS
Fy =
50
ksi
CONCRETE STRENGTH
fc'=
4.5
ksi
TOPPING CONCRETE THICK.
t0 =
in
5/8
in
NOMINAL RIB HEIGHT
hr =
in
AVERAGE WIDTH OF RIB
wr =
in
NUMBER OF STUD IN ONE RIB
Nr =
SHEAR STUD DIA. (1/2, 5/8, 3/4)
d
21.0
Ix
1330
Sx
127
3/4
( Total 34 - 5/8 x 3.5" Shear Studs Required)

ANALYSIS
CHECK DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS (AISC-ASD I5.1, page 5-60)
t0 =
in
>
in
5/8
in
H s = h r + 1.5 =
s =
15
3.5
in o.c.
in
<
wr =
in
>
hr =
=
in
[Satisfactory]
<
in
[Satisfactory]
<
3/4
in
[Satisfactory]
2.5
in o.c.
in
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
in
[Satisfactory]
>
36
2
DETERMINE COMPOSITE PROPERTIES

b = MIN ( L / 4 , B ) =
n=
Ec
29000
=
57 f 'c
A ctr = b t 0 / n =
in, (AISC-ASD I1.1, page 5-56)
7.58
, (ACI 8.5.1)
in2
47.5
Actr ( d + h r + 0.5t 0 )+ 0.5 Ad

=
Actr + A
yb =
I tr = I x + A( y b 0.5d ) +
2
I tr
S tr =
yb
( d + hr + t 0 yb )
20.6
in, from steel bottom.
2
Actr t 02
+ Actr ( 0.5t 0 + h r + d y b ) =
12
in4
3954
192
I tr
St =
120
733
in3, refered to concrete top.
CHECK BENDING & SHEAR CAPACITIES
M max =
Bottom:
Top:
Shear:
fb =
fc =
fv =
wB L 2
8
M max
S tr
1.7 M max
nS t
1.7V max
bt 0
451
ft-kips, (changeable).
28
ksi
1.655
ksi
<
0.9 F y =
[Satisfactory]
<
0.45 f c ' =
V max =
wBL
2
45
kips, (changeable per actual).
45
ksi, (non-shored, AISC-ASD I2.2, page 5-57)
2.025
ksi, (AISC-ASD I2.2, page 5-57)
[Satisfactory]
0.213
ksi
<
2 bt 0 f 'c = 2(0.85)bt 0 f 'c = 41.054 ksi
[Satisfactory]
(neglecting steel capacity conservativly)
(cont'd)
CHECK SHEAR CONNECTOR CAPACITY
'
V h = MIN 0.85 f c Ac / 2
S eff = M max / (0.66 F y ) =
S eff S s
S tr S s
V 'h = MAX
164
0.85
Nr
wr
hr
q' = q =
F y As / 2 =
457.5 kips, (AISC-ASD I4-1 & I4-2, page 5-58)
, 0.25 V h =
148.62 kips, (AISC-ASD I2-1 & I4, page 5-57 & 58)
H s 1.0
hr
0.956
8.80
< 1.0
, (AISC-ASD I5-1, page 5-61)
kips, (AISC-ASD I5.2, page 5-61)
Allowable Horizontal Shear Load for One Connector (q, kips), (AISC-ASD Table I4.1, page 5-59)
Dia.
Concrete fc'
min. Hs
0.500
0.625
0.750
( in )
1/2
5/8
3/4
( in )
2
2 1/2
3
3.0
5.1
8.0
11.5
3.5
5.5
8.6
12.5
4.0 or Larger
5.9
9.2
13.3
2 N 1 ' = 2 V h ' / q' =
34
, total number on the beam for partical composite action.
2 N 1 = 2 V h / q' =
104
, total number on the beam for full composite action.
n = MAX(2N 1 ' , 2N 1 /4) =
34
, total number required on the beam, (AISC-ASD I4, page 5-59)
2. Alan Williams Ph.D., S.E., C.Eng.: "Structural Steel Design - Volume 1: ASD", ICBO, 2001.
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
WF Base Plate Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

AXIAL LOAD OF COMPRESSION
CONCRETE STRENGTH
COLUMN SIZE
BASE PLATE SIZE
P =
600
fc ' =
3
W21X73
=>
N =
19
B =
16
A2 = 1156
AREA OF CONCRETE SUPPORT
(geometrically similar to and concentric with the loaded area.)
kips
ksi
in
in
2
in
USE
19
x
16
2-1/4 in thick plate
ANALYSIS
CHECK BEARING PRESSURE [Page 3-107]:
0.35 f'c
P / A1
>
( 1.97 )
( 1.05 )
2
in , actual area of base plate.
A1 =
Where
304
P / A1
( 1.97 )
<
0.5
MIN [ 0.35 f'C (A2 / A1) , 0.7 f'C ]

( 2.05 )
DETERMINE THE VALUE OF m AND n :

m = 0.5 (N - 0.95 d) =
n = 0.5 (B - 0.8 bf ) =
Where
d
bf
in
4.68
21.20
in
in, depth of column section.
8.30
in, flange width of column section.
tp = 2 c (P / A1 Fy)0.5 =
2.19
c = MAX ( m, n, n' ) =
Where
= 1.0
0.5
[Satisfactory]
-0.57
DETERMINE THICKNESS OF BASE PLATE [Page 3-108]:
n' = ( d bf )
< = Not govern
/4=
3.32
in
4.68
in
in
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
TS Base Plate Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

CONCRETE STRENGTH
COLUMN SIZE
BASE PLATE SIZE
P =
100
kips
fc ' =
3
ksi
HSS8X6X3/16
=>
N =
16
in
B =
14
in
2
in
A2 =
900
USE
16
x
14
1 in thick plate
ANALYSIS
0.35 f'c
P / A1
<
( 0.45 )
( 1.05 )
2
A1 =
Where
224
P / A1
( 0.45 )
0.5
<
MIN [ 0.35 f'C (A2 / A1) , 0.7 f'C ]

( 2.10 )

m = 0.5 (N - 0.95 d) =
n = 0.5 (B - 0.95 b) =
Where
d
=
b
=
4.20
4.15
8.00
6.00
0.5
[Satisfactory]
in
in
in, width of column section.

0.94
tp = 2 c (P / A1 Fy) =
c = MAX ( m, n, n' ) =
Where
= 1.0
n' = d / 4 =
2.00
< = Not govern
in
4.20
in
in
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Pipe Base Plate Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

CONCRETE STRENGTH
COLUMN SIZE
BASE PLATE SIZE
P =
100
kips
fc ' =
3
ksi
HSS7.500X0.312
=>
N =
16
in
B =
16
in
2
in
A2 =
900
USE
16
x
16
ANALYSIS
0.35 f'c
P / A1
<
( 0.39 )
( 1.05 )
2
A1 =
Where
256
P / A1
( 0.39 )
0.5
<
MIN [ 0.35 f'C (A2 / A1) , 0.7 f'C ]

( 1.97 )

m = 0.5 (N - 0.80 d) =
n = 0.5 (B - 0.80 d) =
Where
d
=
5.00
5.00
7.50
0.5
[Satisfactory]
in
in

1.04
tp = 2 c (P / A1 Fy) =
c = MAX ( m, n, n' ) =
Where
= 1.0
n' = d / 4 =
1.88
< = Not govern
in
5.00
in
in
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
WF Base Plate Design Based on AISC-LRFD 2nd Edition

FACTORED AXIAL FORCE
Ru =
1100
fc ' =
3
=>
W33X354
N =
28
26
B =
A2 =
900
CONCRETE STRENGTH
COLUMN SIZE
BASE PLATE SIZE
kips
ksi
in
in
2
in
USE
28
x
26
ANALYSIS
R u / A1
( 1.51 )
Where
R u / A1
( 1.51 )
<
A1
c ( 0.85 f'c )
( 1.53 )
2
=
728
<
0.6
0.5
c 0.85 f'C MIN[(A2 / A1) , 2]

( 1.70 )

m = 0.5 (N - 0.95 d) =
n = 0.5 (B - 0.8 bf ) =
Where
d
bf
[Satisfactory]
-2.91
in
6.56
35.60
in
16.10
in, flange width of column section.

tp = l ( 2Ru / 0.9 A1 Fy)0.5 =
l = MAX ( m, n, n' ) =
Where
= 1.0
n' = ( d bf )
< = Not govern
0.5
/4=
2.00
in
6.56
5.99
in
in
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Beam Connection Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

WF BEAM SECTION
GRAVITY SERVICE LOAD
LATERAL TENSION LOAD, ASD
PLATE THICKNESS
PLATE MATERIAL (A36, A529-42, A529-50,A572-65)
TRIAL WELD SIZE
BOLT DIAMETER
BOLT MATERIAL (A307, A325, A490)
HOLE TYPE (STD, NSL, OVS, SSL, LSL)
STD =
NSL =
OVS =
SSL =
LSL =
= > W21x44
P = 37.57 kips
T = 180 kips
0.5 in
t =
ASTM = A36
w = 0.437 in ( 7/16 in)
=
1
in ( 1 in)
ASTM = A325
=>
STD
Standard round holes ( d + 1/16 " )

Long or short-slotted hole normal to load direction
Oversize round holes
Short-slotted holes holes
Long-slotted holes
CONNECTION TYPE (SC, N, X)

SC
N
X
USE PLATE 18" x 6 1/2" x 1/2" WITH WELD 7/16" EACH SIDE TO
COLUMN AND 2 ROW OF TOTAL (11) - 1" BOLTS AT BEAM END.
SC
=>
= Slip critical connection

= Bearing-type connection with threads included in the shear plane
= Bearing-type connection with threads excluded from the shear plane
IS TOP FLANGE COPED ? (1=Yes, 0=No,)
Yes
=>
tf
0.45
Sx
81.6
13.4
kips / bolt
kips
=
=
=
10.3
3.00
1.50
in
in
147
kips
ANALYSIS
DATA FOR ROLLED SECTION CHOSEN
A
13
d
20.7
tw
0.35
bf
6.5
CHECK CAPACITY OF BOLTS

Allow shear per bolt
2
2 0.5
3/4(P + T )
=
No. of bolts required
Bolt spacing required
Edge spacing required
138
Bolt group capacity
CHECK CAPACITY OF WELDING (70XX)

e
Plate thickness
Weld size,w
Min allowable weld
Max allowable weld
te
D
=
=
=
=
=
3.5
0.50
0.44
0.19
0.44
=
=
0.31
18.0
>
>
in
in
in
in
in
Vertical shear = P / Aw = P / 2 D te
Bending stress = P e / I
=
=
3.4
0.4
ksi
ksi
Tension stress =
16.2
ksi
3.4
21.0
ksi
ksi
Resultant Stress = 3/4 [ (P/Aw)2 + (P e/ I + T/Aw)2 ]0.5 =

Resultant Stress = [ (P/Aw)2 + (P e/ I )2 ]0.5 =
Allow shear Fv = 0.3 x 70
=
=
3.0
1.5
kips
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
in
in
4
300.3 in
I = 2 ( te D3 / 12 )
T / Aw = T / 2 D te
Bolt spacing used

Edge spacing used
3/4(P2 + T2 )0.5 =
138
P =
38
kips
12.7
ksi
>
12.7
ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK PLATE FOR SHEAR CAPACITY

P/A
=
4.2
ksi
< 0.4 x
36
14.4
ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK PLATE FOR TENSION CAPACITY

(3/4) T / A
=
15.0
ksi
< 0.6 x
36
21.6
ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK NET SHEAR FRACTURE

Fu
58
ksi
Pallow = 0.3 Fu [ D - n (ds + 1/8 ) ] t
98
kips
>
218
kips
>
37.57 kips
[Satisfactory]
CHECK NET TENSION FRACTURE

Fu
58
ksi
Tallow = (4/3) 0.5 Fu [ D - n (ds + 1/8 ) ] t
180
kips
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
CHECK BLOCK SHEAR ( WEB TEAR-OUT)

( Applies only if top flange is coped for P)
lh
3.0
in
lv
11.0
in
Fu
58
ksi
Rbs,P = 0.3 Av Fu + 0.5 At Fu = (0.3 lv + 0.5 lh) tw Fu

Rbs,T = 4/3 (0.5 lv + (2) 0.3 lh) tw Fu
198
>
=
>
97
P=
kips
37.57 kips
T=
180
kips
[Satisfactory]
in
in
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Brace Connection Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th

= > HSS8X8X5/8
T = 450 kips
(For seismic T = 0 x ASD / 1.7 suggested. CBC 2213.4.2)
rmin
16.40
2.98
0.58
8.00
=
2=
50
24
COLUMN CENTER TO INTERFACE
ec =
7.33
in
BEAM CENTER TO INTERFACE
eb =
14.8
in
ANGLE BETWEEN BRACE & COLUMN

COLUMN INTERFACE DIMENSION
Tube
in
( 5/8" Gusset Plate with 5/16" Fillet Weld, 4 leg x 25" Length at Brace,
and 2 leg x 24" at Column Interface, 2 leg x 50" at Beam Interface. )

ANALYSIS
DETERMINE BEST FILLET WELD SIZE PER BRACE THICKNESS (ASD Sec.J2.2b)
> wMIN =
0.1875 in
in
w=
5/16
< wMAX =
0.4375 in
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE REQUIRED WELD LENGTH AT BRACE (ASD Sec.J2.4 )

L = T / [(4) (0.3) Fu (0.707 w)]
= 450.00 / [(4) (0.3) (70) (0.707x5/16)] =
24.25 in
25
in )
( USE
CHECK SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE (ASD Sec.J4)

Tt,rup,brace =(0.3Fu)Anu =
Where
1010.94
Fu =
58
kips
>
T
[Satisfactory]
Anu = 4 t L = 4 x 0.581 x 25 =
58.10
in2
DETERMINE REQUIRED THICKNESS OF GUSSET PLATE PER Tt,rup,brace ABOVE (ASD Tab. J2.4)
tg =
5/8
in
Tt,rup,gusset = (0.3Fu)Anv = 543.8
Where
Fu =
kips
58
>
[Satisfactory]
31.25
in2
ksi (A36 Steel)
Anv = 2 tg L = 2 x 5/8 x 25 =
Tt,brace = (0.5FuUAn) =
Where
458.75
U =
A n = A - 2 t tg =
kips
>
CHECK GUSSET BLOCK SHEAR CAPACITY (ASD J4)

T
Ts,guss = [0.3FuAnv + 0.5FuAgt] =
[Satisfactory]
(ASD Sec.B3)
2
15.819 in
> T=
544 +1.7[0.5FuAgt]
450.0
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE CONNECTION INTERFACE FORCES, USING THE UNIFORM FORCE METHOD & TO REMAIN FREE OF INTERFACE MOMENTS
=
12.00
in, as given
= (eb + ) tan - ec =
24.61
in
r = [(eb + )2 + (ec + )2] 0.5 =
41.69
in
129.5
kips
Vc = ( / r) T =
Hc = (ec / r) T =
79.1
kips
Vb = (eb / r) T =
159.7
kips
Hb = ( / r) T =
265.6
kips
50
CHECK WELD CAPACITY AT INTERFACES (ASD Sec.J2.4 )

fVc = Vc / (4 0.707 w) =
12.21
ksi
fHc = Hc / (4 0.707 w) =
7.46
ksi
fVb = VB / (4 0.707 w) =
7.34
ksi
fHb = HB / (4 0.707 w) =
12.21
ksi
fv,c = [(fvc)2 + (fHc)2] 0.5 =
14.31
ksi
fv,b = [(fvb)2 + (fHb)2] 0.5 =
14.25
ksi
<
<
0.3 Fu =
21.00
ksi
[Satisfactory]
0.3 Fu =
21.00
ksi
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Brace Connection Design Based on AISC-LRFD 2th & 3th

=>
BRACE AXIAL LOAD AT STRENGTH LEVEL
HSS8X8X5/8
Tu =
Tube
kips, SD
980
rmin
16.40
2.98
0.58
8.00
(For OCBF Tu = Ry Fy Ag suggested. AISC Seismic 14.2)

0
=
2=
50
24
COLUMN CENTER TO INTERFACE
ec =
7.33
in
BEAM CENTER TO INTERFACE
eb =
14.8
in
in
ANGLE BETWEEN BRACE & COLUMN

COLUMN INTERFACE DIMENSION
( 5/8" Gusset Plate with 5/16" Fillet Weld, 4 leg x 36" Length at Brace,
and 2 leg x 24" at Column Interface, 2 leg x 50" at Beam Interface.
Cover Plate 3/4 x 7 at Each Sides.)

ANALYSIS
DETERMINE BEST FILLET WELD SIZE PER BRACE THICKNESS (LRFD Sec.J2.2b)
> wMIN =
0.1875 in
w=
5/16
in
< wMAX =
0.4375 in
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE REQUIRED WELD LENGTH AT BRACE (LRFD Sec.J2.4)
L = Tu / [(4) Fw (0.707 w)]
= 980.00 / [(4) 0.75 (0.6 x 70) (0.707x5/16)] =
35.20 in
( USE
36
in )
CHECK DESIGN SHEAR RUPTURE CAPACITY OF SLOTED BRACE (LRFD Sec.J4.1)
Tn = (0.6Fu)Anv =
=
Where
2183.63
0.75
Fu =
58
kips
>
Tu
[Satisfactory]
Anu = 4 t L = 4 x 0.581 x 0.1875 =
83.66
in

tg =
5/8
in

Tn = (0.6Fu)Anv = 1174.5
Where
0.75
Fu =
58
kips
>
Tu
[Satisfactory]
45.00
in
Tu
[Cover Plate Required]
ksi (A36 Steel)
Anv = 2 tg L = 2 x 5/8 x 36 =

Tn = Fu Ae =
=
Where
607.94
0.75
kips
<
Fu =
x =
58
U = MIN( 1 - x / L , 0.9 ) =
0.90
,(LRFD B3.)
2
An = Ag - 2 (tg + 1/8) t =
15.53 in
Ae =
U An = 13.98 in
7.33
Try Cover Plate
3/4
Region
HSS
Cover Plate
3.00
4.38
, at Each Sides.
xA
0.5 An
7.76
5.25
23.29
22.97
13.01
46.26
x = 46.26 / 13.01 =
3.55
U = MIN( 1 - x / L , 0.9 ) =
0.90
2
An = 15.53 + 10.50 =
26.03 in
2
Ae = U An = 23.43 in
Thus,
Tn = Fu Ae =
1019.02
kips
>
Tu
[Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
DETERMINE CONNECTION INTERFACE FORCES, USING THE UNIFORM FORCE METHOD & TO REMAIN FREE OF INTERFACE MOMENTS
=
12.00
in, as given
= (eb + ) tan - ec =
24.61
in
r = [(eb + )2 + (ec + )2] 0.5 =
41.69
in
282.1
kips
172.3
kips
Vb = (eb / r) Tu =
347.9
kips
Hb = ( / r) Tu =
578.4
kips
Vc = ( / r) Tu =
Hc = (ec / r) Tu =
CHECK WELD CAPACITY AT INTERFACES (ASD Sec.J2.4 )

fVc = Vc / (4 0.707 w) =
26.60
ksi
fHc = Hc / (4 0.707 w) =
16.25
ksi
fVb = VB / (4 0.707 w) =
16.00
ksi
fHb = HB / (4 0.707 w) =
26.60
ksi
fv,c = [(fvc)2 + (fHc)2] 0.5 =
31.17
ksi
31.04
ksi
2 0.5
fv,b = [(fvb) + (fHb) ]
<
<
Fw =
31.50
ksi
[Satisfactory]
Fw =
31.50
ksi
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Check Reinforcement of WF Beam at Opening

WF SECTION
MABCD
MEFGH
V
ASTM
w
MOMENT @ ABCD SECTION

MOMENT @ EFGH SECTION
MAX SHEAR @ OPENING
STEEL MATERIALS (A36, A50)
TRIAL WELD SIZE
=>
=
=
=
=
=
b
h
e
t
OPENING DIMENSIONS
W24x76
90
ft-k
75
ft-k
OPENING LOCATION
60
A50
0.25
kips
PLATE SIZE @ EACH SIDE
=
=
=
=
=
48
in
10
in
in
0.75
4.25
in
in
in
USE (4) - 3/4" x 4-1/4" x 6' -10" PLATES, WITH WELD 1/4" AT EACH SIDES, TOP & BOTTOM.
ANALYSIS
DATA FOR ROLLED SECTION CHOSEN
A
tw
bf
tf
Sx
Fb
33.00
ksi
22.4
23.9
0.44
8.99
0.68
176
Fv
20.00
ksi
y1b
3.88
y2t
2.88
y2b
3.04
A top
15.7
Y1
12.2
Y2
11.7
V top
34.48
V bott
25.52
Ms top
69.0
Ms bott
51.0
PROPERTIES OF OPENING SECTION

t
0.75
y1t
4.12
4.25
CHECK BENDING STRESSES
MAIN BENDING STRESSES
1 A
1 B
1 C
1 D
1 E
1 F
1 G
1 H
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
-5.50
-1.91
2.59
5.25
-4.59
-1.59
2.16
4.37
2 A
2 B
2 C
2 D
2 E
2 F
2 G
2 H
=
DETERMINE STIFFENER EXTENSIONS

Max bending stress fb @ stiffener
Force, F
=
8.5
x
Allow stress in web
Extension =
143.1
/
(
0.25
I top
173
SECONDARY BENDING STRESSES
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
Max fb
CHECK WELDING
Weld width, w =
A bott
14.8
in
Max
-19.14
19.14
-20.29
20.29
19.14
-19.14
20.29
-20.29
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
( 1+2 )
0.75
22.44
0.44
20.00
25.54
=
=
=
=
V top
34.48
Q top
23.5
I top
173
q top
4.69
V bott
25.52
Q bott
22.4
I bott
89
q bott
6.38
q critical
te = 0.707w
q / 4 te
=
=
=
<
ksi
22.4
143
20.0
16.3
17.0
Say =>
0.25
in
k/in
in
ksi
-24.64
17.23
-17.70
25.54
14.55
-20.73
22.44
-15.91
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
33.00
ksi
[Satisfactory]
20.00
ksi
[Satisfactory]
ksi
k
ksi
in
in
Max weld
6.38
0.18
9.03
I total
2,402
TOTAL BENDING STRESSES
( 1+2 )
( 1+2 )
( 1+2 )
( 1+2 )
( 1+2 )
( 1+2 )
( 1+2 )
( 1+2 )
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
Min weld =
I bott
89
<
0.69
Fv =
in
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Capacity of Bolts in Bearing Connection Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

=
BOLT DIAMETER
ASTM =
HOLE TYPE (STD, NSL, OVS, SSL, LSL) = >
STD =
NSL =
OVS =
SSL =
LSL =
in ( 7/8 in)
Standard round holes ( d + 1/16 " )

Long or short-slotted hole normal to load direction
Oversize round holes
Short-slotted holes holes
Long-slotted holes
LOADING (S=single shear,S=double shear)

CONNECTION TYPE (SC, N, X)
=>
SC
N
X
0.875
A325
STD
D
N
= Slip critical connection

= Bearing-type connection with threads included in the shear plane
= Bearing-type connection with threads excluded from the shear plane
PLATE THICKNESS
t1 =
1
in
PLATE MATERIAL (A36, A441-46, A472-50,A514-90)
ASTM =
A36
NUMBER OF ROWS
=>
3
NUMBER OF BOLTS / ROW
BOLT SPACING
EDGE DISTANCE
=>
s =
e =
3
3
1.25
in
in
Pallowable
161 kips
ANALYSIS
MIN.THICKNESS OF SIDE PLATES
t2 =
0.5
in
PLATE YIELD STRENGTH
Fy =
36.0
kips
PLATE WIDTH
D =
8.50
in
PLATE TENSILE STRENGTH
Fu =
58.0
kips
CHECK MIDDLE PLATE FOR SHEAR :

CHECK MIDDLE PLATE FOR BEARING DUE TO BOLT SPACING :
CHECK MIDDLE PLATE FOR BEARING DUE TO EDGE DISTANCE :
CHECK MIDDLE PLATE FOR TENSION :
0.6 Fy Ag =
184
3
3.00
1.5
1.50
0.5 Fu U An =
161
Bolt
0.875
kips / bolt
25.30
P (kips)
228
0.875
60.90
548
0.875
36.3
327
<=gov
161
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Tensile Capacity of Bolts Connection Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

BOLT DIAMETER
NUMBER OF BOLTS
DISTANCE FROM BOLT CENTERLINE TO EDGE
DISTANCE FROM BOLT CENTERLINE TO STEM FACE
SMALLER THICKNESS OF FLANGES
LENGTH OF FLANGE TRIBUTARY TO EACH BOLT
=
ASTM =
n=
a=
b=
t=
p=
YIELD STRENGTH OF THE FLANGE MATERIAL
Pallowable
93.0
in ( 3/4 in)
0.75
A325
6
1.778
1.792
0.695
4.5
Fy =
50
B=
19.4
in
in
in
in
ksi
kips
ANALYSIS (AISC-ASD, page 4-89 to 4-95)

d' = + 1/16 =
b' = b - 0.5 =
a' = a + 0.5 =
tc =
0.813
1.417
2.153
'
8 Bb
=
pF y
B
T allow = B
tc
kips / bolt, (from table below, AISC-ASD page 4-3 )
'
= 1 d =
0.819
0.989
tc
t
in
in
in
' =
1
'
1+ b'
tc
t
1 =
0.753
(1 + )
(1 + )
'
for ' > 1

, for 0 ' 1
15.5
kips / bolt
B , for ' < 0
TENSION
ALLOWABLE LOADS ( kips )
TENSION ON GROSS ( NOMINAL ) AREA
NOMINAL BOLT DIAMETER, ( in )
ASTM DESIGNATION
Ft
( ksi )
A307
A325
A490
20
44
54
5/8
0.3068
6.1
13.5
16.6
3/4
7/8
1 1/8
1 1/4
1 3/8
AREA BASED ON NOMINAL DIAMETER ( in2 )

0.4418
0.6013
0.7854
0.9940
1.2270
1.4850
8.8
12.0
15.7
19.9
24.5
29.7
19.4
26.5
34.6
43.7
54.0
65.3
23.9
32.5
42.4
53.7
66.3
80.2
1 1/2
1.7670
35.3
77.7
95.4
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Weld Capacity of Eccentric Connection Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

THICKER PART JOINTED
WELD SIZE
ECCENTRICITY TO EDGE
t =
w=
e =
WELD LENGTH, DA
WELD LENGTH, DC
WELD LENGTH, CB
Pallowable
0.75
0.25
30
in
in
in
L1 =
in
L2 =
18
in
L3 =
in
10.7 kips
ANALYSIS
MIN WELD SIZE
wmin =
0.25 in
MAX WELD SIZE
wmax =
0.69 in
EFFECTIVE THROAT THICHNESS

CENTROID OF WELD GROUP
te =
0.707 w
0.18
in
X0 =
Xi Ai / Ai
0.42
in
Yi Ai / Ai
Y0 =
Ix =
CENTRODIAL MOMENT OF INERTIA
Iy =
TOTAL ECCENTRICITY
9.75
in
(b h3/ 12 + A d2 )
169
in4
(b h3/ 12 + A d2 )
in4
in
e total =
e + L1 - X0
33.6
e total / ( Ix + Iy )
0.194
Fv =
0.3 Fu
21.0
FACTOR
ALLOWABLE STRESS
ksi
DIRECT SHEAR FORCE @ POINTS A, B, C, D

f i y = Py / Aw
0.24 P
f i x = Px / Aw
0.00 P
THE VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL COMPONENTS OF SHEAR FORCE @ POINTS A, B, C, D

Point A :
Ryi
xi P =
0.70 P
Rxi
yi P =
1.60 P
Point B :
Ryi
xi P =
0.31 P
Rxi
yi P =
1.89 P
Point C :
Ryi
xi P =
0.08 P
Rxi
yi P =
1.89 P
Point D :
Ryi
xi P =
0.08 P
Rxi
yi P =
1.60 P
THE RESULTANT SHEAR FORCE @ POINTS A, B, C, D

)2 +
0.24
+
0.70
Point A : Ri = [ (
0.00
Point B :
Ri = [ (
0.24
0.31
)2
0.00
Point C :
Ri = [ (
0.24
0.08
)2
0.00
0.08
)2
Point D :
Ri = [ (
0.24
0.00
+
+
+
+
1.60
) 2 ] 0.5
1.85 P
1.89
) 2 ] 0.5
1.97 P
1.89
) 2 ] 0.5
1.92 P
1.60
) 2 ] 0.5
1.63 P
1.97 P
Ri,max
THE ALLOWABLE LOAD
Pallowable = Fv / Ri,max =
10.66
kips
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Weld Size of Eccentric Connection Based on AISC-LRFD 2nd Edition

WELD LENGTH
t =
L=
KL =
e =
0.75
10
4
8
FACTORED LOAD
Pu =
50
USE w =
3/8
in
in
in
in
kips
in WELD
ANALYSIS
MAX WELD SIZE
wmax =
MIN WELD SIZE

THICKER PART JOINED
To 1/4 " inclusive
Over 1/4 to 1/2
Over 1/2 to 3/4
Over 3/4
wmin = 0.25 in
MIN SIZE OF FILLET WELD
1/8
3/16
1/4
5/16
0.69 in
k
=
0.40
x
=
0.80
xL
=
8.0
aL
=
4.00
a
=
0.40
C
=
0.88 (from AISC-LRFD Table 8-42)
C1
=
1.00 (E70 electrodes, from AISC-LRFD Table 8-37)
D = no. of sixteenths of an inch fillet weld size required
=
D = Pu / ( C C 1 L )
SAY
=>
GOVERNS =>
5.69 / 16
6 / 16
6 / 16
in
in
in
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Weld Capacity of Eccentric Connection Based on AISC-ASD 9th Edition

WELD SIZE
WELD LENGTH
SERVICE LEVEL LOAD
t = 0.75 in
w = 0.375 in
x =
6
in
D=
10
in
P = 29.8 kips
ANALYSIS
MIN WELD SIZE
w min =
0.25
in
MAX WELD SIZE
w max =
0.69
in
te=
0.707 w
CENTRODIAL MOMENT OF INERTIA
Ix=
2 (t e D3 / 12 )
DIRECT SHEAR STRESS
fy=
P/2Dte
BENDING STRESS
fx=
DPx/2Ix
RESULTANT STRESS
f =
ALLOWABLE STRESS
Fv =
0.27
=
=
( f x + f y ) 0.5 =
0.3 F u
in
44.2
5.6
ksi
20.2
ksi
21.0
ksi
21.0
ksi
in4
>
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Balance Weld Length & Compute Capacity ased on AISC-ASD 9th Edition
SERVICE LEVEL LOAD
WELD SIZE
P=
t =
w=
81
0.5
0.1875
WELD LENGTH AT END

CENTROID OF ANGLE SECTION
L2 =
d=
5
1.75
Pallowable
L1
L3
=
=
=
kips
in
in
in
in
81.0 kips
7.7 in
16.4 in
ANALYSIS
MIN WELD SIZE
w min =
0.1875
MAX WELD SIZE
w max =
0.44
in
in
te=
0.707 w
ALLOWABLE STRESS
Fv =
0.3 Fu
=
=
0.13
in
21.0
ksi
R2=
Fv L2 t e =
13.92
ksi
THE LOAD CARRIED BY BOTTOM WELD
R1=
P ( 1 - d / L2 ) - R2 / 2 =
45.69
ksi
THE LOAD CARRIED BY TOP WELD
R3=
P - R1 - R2 =
21.39
ksi
REQUIRED WELD LENGTH AT BOTTOM
L1=
R1 / (Fv t e ) =
16.41
in
REQUIRED WELD LENGTH AT TOP
L3=
R3 / (Fv t e ) =
7.68
in
R1 + R2 + R3 =
81.00
in
THE LOAD CARRIED BY END WELD
THE ALLOWABLE LOAD
Pallowable =
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
Tian Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Design of 1 1/2" Type "B" Roof Deck Based on ICBO ER-2078P

NO. OF SPANS (1,2 or 3)
DECK VERT. SPAN LENGTH
n =
=
GAGE (22,20,18,16) ? =>

DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
DIAPHRAGM HORIZ SPAN
DIAPHRAGM HORIZ DEPTH
== >
DL
LL
L
d
THE MAX DIAPHRAGM SHEAR

NO. OF SUPPORT WELD (4, 5 or 7)
SPACING OF PUDDLE WELD
SIDE LAP TYPE (0=BP, 1=TSW)
SPACING OF SIDELAP CONNECTION
v =
== >
== >
=
=
=
=
2
9
USE:
1 1/2" x 20 GA. VERCO PLB-36/HSB-36 GALVANIZED ROOF DECK
ft
20
20
20
150
50
GA
( 2 SPANS MINS)
5 -1/2 " PUDDLE WELDS PER SHEET, EACH SUPPORT.
1/2" PUDDLE WELD @ 12" O.C. EACH PARALLEL SUPPORT.
SIDELAP TOP SEAM WELD (TSW) @ 12" O.C.
680
5
12
1
12
plf
per sheet
in o.c.
Top Seam Weld
in o.c.
psf
psf
ft
ft
(THE DIAPHRAGM DEFLECTION, 0.69 in, AT MIDDLE SPAN.)
ANALYSIS
PLB & HSB SECTION PROPERTIES (ER-2078P, Table 4, page 3)
3
PUDDLE WELDS ALLOWABLE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR (ER-2078P, Table 1, page 2)
GAGE
thk, in
I, in4/ft
+S, in /ft
-S, in /ft
Wt, psf
GAGE
6" o.c.
9" o.c.
12" o.c.
18" o.c.
16
0.0598
0.377
0.411
0.417
3.5
16
4186
2791
2093
1395
18
0.0478
0.302
0.322
0.335
2.9
18
3346
2231
1673
1115
20
0.0359
0.216
0.235
0.248
2.3
20
2513
1675
1257
838
22
0.0299
0.175
0.187
0.198
1.9
22
2093
1395
1047
698
10
11
12
12'-0"
HSB-36 ALLOWABLE DIAPHRAGM SHEAR, q (plf), AND FLEXIBILITY FACTORS, F (ER-2078P, Table 20, page 40-47)
SUPPORT
GAGE
BP
4'-0"
5'-0"
6'-0"
7'-0"
8'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
11'-0"
36/5
20
24
690
675
590
516
447
405
361
334
36/5
20
24
4.0+91R
5.1+73R
6.5+61R
8.2+52R
10.4+45R
12.8+40R
15.9+36R
19.0+33R
23.1+30R
36/5
20
12
762
733
656
568
501
450
408
374
346
36/5
20
12
3.9+91R
4.9+73R
6.1+61R
7.7+52R
9.5+45R
11.7+40R
14.3+36R
17.2+33R
20.6+30R
36/5
20
24
991
872
730
679
598
572
518
504
465
36/5
20
24
20.5+43R
18.2+34R
23.7+28R
21.5+24R
26.2+21R
24.1+19R
28.3+17R
26.3+16R
30.2+14R
36/5
20
18
1084
941
788
727
680
608
583
561
518
36/5
20
18
13.4+43R
13.4+34R
17.2+28R
16.6+24R
16.3+21R
19.4+19R
18.8+17R
18.5+16R
21.1+14R
36/5
20
12
1169
1006
895
816
756
709
672
641
615
36/5
20
12
10.0+43R
10.6+34R
11.0+28R
11.4+24R
11.8+21R
12.1+19R
12.4+17R
12.6+16R
12.8+14R
36/5
20
1469
1293
1174
1088
1023
972
931
818
688
36/5
20
5.4+43R
5.5+34R
5.6+28R
5.7+24R
5.8+21R
5.9+19R
5.9+17R
6.0+16R
6.0+14R
20.72
TSW
CHECK VERTICAL BENDING CAPACITY
fb =
0.125 wl 2
, for Simple Span
+S
2
0.125 wl
, for Double Spans
S
0.1wl 2
, for Triple Spans
S
ksi, (Vero PunchLok Book, page 5.)

Fb
<
[Satisfactory]
Where w = (DL + Wt) + LL =

42
psf
Fb =
22.8 ksi, (Vero PunchLok Book, page 4.)
CHECK VERTICAL DEFLECTION
0.013wLL l 4C d
, for Simple Span
EI
4
0.0054 wLLl C d
, for Double Spans
LL =
EI
0.0069 wLLl 4C d
, for Triple Spans
EI
Where wLL =
0.19
in, (Vero PunchLok Book, page 5.)

/ 240 =
<
Cd =
20
1728
psf, as given
, (Vero PunchLok Book, page 5.)
E=
29500
ksi, , (from ER-2078P, page 6)
0.45
in
[Satisfactory]
CHECK HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGM SHEAR CAPACITY

v=
680
plf, as given
<
<
vallow =
vallow =
709
1257
0.0600
0.6316
plf, (for 36/5 & TSW from table above.)

plf, ( for Puddle Weld from table above.)
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
DETERMINE HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGM DEFLECTION

3
= f + w =
5w L 4(12 )
w L 2F
+
6
384 EI
8(10 ) d
Where w = 2 d v / L =
453
plf
R = (4 - n) / 3 =
0.667
, (from ER-2078P, page 39 footnotes.)
F=
12.1+19R
=
24.77
, for TSW connection.
2
A=
16.2 in , steel chord member area.
2
2
2916000 in , (ER-2078 page 6)
= 0.5 A d =
0.6916
50
in, (from ER-2078P, page 6)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE:
DEPRESSED FLOOR DECK CAPACITY USING STEEL PROPERTIES ONLY (NON COMPOSITE)
DEAD LOAD
DL =
70
psf (including partitions)
LIVE LOAD
LL =
50
psf (non-reduceable)
L=
GA =
TYPE =
8
18
W2
ft
SPAN LENGTH
GAGE (22, 20, 18, 16)
DECK TYPE (B, W2, W3, N)
THE DEPRESSED FLOOR DECK IS ADEQUATE.

SECTION PROPERTIES (See Tables below)
4
+S (in3/ft)
I (in /ft)
Type
Gage
W2
18
0.555
For one span,
0.51
-S (in /ft)
Fb
0.511
22.8
2
0.125 (DL+LL) L =
0.960
Mallowable =
Fb (+S) =
0.969
max,Total =
4
5 (DL+LL) L / (384 EI) =
0.7
in ( L / 140 )
max,LL =
4
5 (LL) L / (384 EI) =
0.3
in ( L / 335 )
Mmax =
For two spans, uniform LL on one span

Mmax =
2
2
0.0070 (DL) L + 0.096 (LL) L =
ft-kips
ft-kips
0.621
ok
ft-kips
Mallowable =
Fb (+S) =
max,Total =
4
(0.00541DL + 0.0092LL) L / (EI) =
0.4
in ( L / 260 )
max,LL =
4
( 0.0092LL) L / (EI) =
0.2
in ( L / 475 )
For two spans, all spans loaded

-Mmax =
0.969
2
-0.125 (DL+LL) L =
ft-kips
-0.960
ok
ft-kips
-Mallowable =
Fb (-S) =
max,Total =
4
0.00541(DL + LL) L / (EI) =
0.3
in ( L / 336 )
max,LL =
4
( 0.0054LL) L / (EI) =
0.1
in ( L / 807 )
For three spans, all spans loaded
-0.969
ft-kips
2
- 0.100 (DL+LL) L =
-0.768
- Mallowable =
Fb (-S) =
-0.969
max,Total =
4
0.0069 (DL+LL) L / (EI) =
0.4
in ( L / 264 )
max,LL =
4
0.0069 (LL) L / (EI) =
0.2
in ( L / 633 )
- Mmax =
ok
ft-kips
ft-kips
ok
B SECTION PROPERTIES (Verco Page 34 & 35)

I (in4/ft)
+S (in3/ft)
-S (in3/ft)
Gage
16
0.377
0.411
0.417
18
0.302
0.322
0.335
20
0.216
0.235
0.248
22
0.175
0.187
0.198
N SECTION PROPERTIES (Verco Page 88 & 89)

I (in4/ft)
+S (in3/ft) -S (in3/ft)
Gage
16
1.542
0.851
0.914
18
1.146
0.664
0.737
20
0.780
0.466
0.548
22
0.613
0.361
0.446
W2 SECTION PROPERTIES (Verco Page 52 & 53)

4
+S (in3/ft)
-S (in3/ft)
I (in /ft)
Gage
16
0.694
0.639
0.639
18
0.555
0.510
0.511
20
0.423
0.361
0.370
22
0.340
0.283
0.287
W3 SECTION PROPERTIES (Verco Page 70 & 71)

I (in4/ft)
+S (in3/ft) -S (in3/ft)
Gage
16
1.509
0.960
0.960
18
1.203
0.767
0.767
20
0.896
0.534
0.564
22
0.718
0.418
0.444
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
T. Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
40LH Series Truss Joist / Vulcraft or Equial

DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
20 psf
20.02 psf
40.02 psf
JOIST SPACING
JOIST SPAN
=
=
8
ft
73.667 ft
PLASTER CEILING ?
( 1 = YES, 0 = NO )
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
SELF LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
=
160.0
160.2
25.0
345
TRIAL CODE 1 THRU 9
==>
USE 40LH12 @ 8 ft o.c.
1. STRENGTH CHECK
(TOTAL LOAD, lbs / ft)
no
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
ACTUAL
<
ALLOW
345
<
382
<
L / 360
160
<
197
ok
75
196
100
256
131
283
144
308
157
373
189
440
223
502
252
552
279
655
329
76
192
97
250
126
276
139
300
151
364
182
429
214
490
243
538
268
638
316
77
187
93
244
122
269
134
293
145
355
176
419
207
478
233
524
258
622
304
2. DEFLECTION CHECK
(LIVE LOAD, lbs / ft)
ok
STANDARD LOAD TABLES / OPEN WEB STEEL JOISTS LH-SERIES

The black figures give the TOTAL load capacity;
The blue figures are the LIVE load that will give a deflection of L/360;
JOIST
ID
WT
lbs/ft
DEPTH
in
40LH08
16
40
40LH09
21
40
40LH10
21
40
40LH11
22
40
40LH12
25
40
40LH13
30
40
40LH14
35
40
40LH15
36
40
40LH16
42
40
CLEAR
65
254
150
332
196
367
216
399
234
486
285
573
334
656
383
734
427
808
469
66
247
144
323
188
357
207
388
224
472
273
557
320
638
367
712
408
796
455
67
241
138
315
180
347
198
378
215
459
261
542
307
620
351
691
390
784
441
68
234
132
306
173
338
190
368
207
447
251
528
295
603
336
671
373
772
428
69
228
127
298
166
329
183
358
198
435
241
514
283
587
323
652
357
761
416
70
222
122
291
160
321
176
349
190
424
231
500
271
571
309
633
342
751
404
SPAN
71
217
117
283
153
313
169
340
183
413
222
487
260
556
297
616
328
730
387
IN
FEET
72
211
112
276
147
305
162
332
176
402
213
475
250
542
285
599
315
710
371
73
206
108
269
141
297
156
323
169
392
205
463
241
528
273
583
302
691
356
74
201
104
263
136
290
150
315
163
382
197
451
231
515
263
567
290
673
342
78
183
90
239
118
262
129
286
140
346
169
409
199
466
225
511
248
606
292
79
178
86
233
113
255
124
279
135
338
163
399
192
455
216
498
239
591
282
80
174
83
228
109
249
119
273
130
330
157
390
185
444
209
486
230
576
271
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
T. Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :

DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
JOIST SPACING
JOIST SPAN
=
=
6
60
ft
ft
PLASTER CEILING ?
( 1 = YES, 0 = NO )
no
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
SELF LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
=
20 psf
20.02 psf
40.02 psf
120.0
120.1
16.0
256
TRIAL CODE 1 THRU 9
==>
1. STRENGTH CHECK
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
ACTUAL
<
ALLOW
256
<
266
<
L / 360
120
<
153
ok
68
212
107
233
118
297
150
328
165
358
180
424
213
502
251
551
270
600
299
69
207
103
227
113
289
144
320
159
348
173
412
204
488
240
535
259
583
286
70
201
99
221
109
282
138
311
152
339
166
400
195
475
231
520
247
567
274
2. DEFLECTION CHECK
ok

JOIST
ID
WT
lbs/ft
DEPTH
in
36LH07
16
36
36LH08
18
36
36LH09
21
36
36LH10
21
36
36LH11
23
36
36LH12
30
36
36LH13
36
36
36LH14
36
36
36LH15
36
36
CLEAR
57
292
177
321
194
411
247
454
273
495
297
593
354
697
415
768
456
809
480
58
283
168
311
185
398
235
440
260
480
283
575
338
675
395
755
434
795
464
59
274
160
302
176
386
224
426
248
465
269
557
322
654
376
729
412
781
448
60
266
153
293
168
374
214
413
236
451
257
540
307
634
359
706
392
769
434
61
258
146
284
160
363
204
401
225
438
246
523
292
615
342
683
373
744
413
62
251
140
276
153
352
195
389
215
425
234
508
279
596
327
661
356
721
394
SPAN
63
244
134
268
146
342
186
378
206
412
224
493
267
579
312
641
339
698
375
IN
FEET
64
237
128
260
140
333
179
367
197
401
214
478
255
562
298
621
323
677
358
65
230
122
253
134
323
171
357
188
389
205
464
243
546
285
602
309
656
342
66
224
117
246
128
314
163
347
180
378
196
450
232
531
273
584
295
637
327
67
218
112
239
123
306
157
338
173
368
188
437
222
516
262
567
283
618
312
71
196
95
215
104
275
133
303
146
330
159
389
187
463
222
505
237
551
263
72
191
91
209
100
267
127
295
140
322
153
378
179
451
213
492
228
536
252
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
T. Li
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
JOIST SPACING
JOIST SPAN
=
=
PLASTER CEILING ?
( 1 = YES, 0 = NO )
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
SELF LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
=
40
20
60
psf
psf
psf
TRIAL CODE 1 THRU 9
8
ft
34.667 ft
320.0
160.0
16.0
496
==>
no
1. STRENGTH CHECK
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
ACTUAL
<
ALLOW
496
<
555
<
L / 360
160
<
356
ok
43
234
124
262
138
304
160
381
197
426
223
455
238
548
272
608
304
671
337
44
224
116
251
130
291
150
364
184
407
208
435
222
524
254
582
285
642
315
45
215
109
241
122
280
141
348
172
389
195
417
208
501
238
556
266
616
294
2. DEFLECTION CHECK
ok

JOIST
ID
WT
lbs/ft
DEPTH
in
24LH03
11
24
24LH04
12
24
24LH05
13
24
24LH06
16
24
24LH07
17
24
24LH08
18
24
24LH09
21
24
24LH010
23
24
24LH011
25
24
CLEAR
33
342
235
419
288
449
308
604
411
665
452
707
480
832
562
882
596
927
624
34
339
226
398
265
446
297
579
382
638
421
677
447
808
530
856
559
900
588
35
336
218
379
246
440
285
555
356
613
393
649
416
785
501
832
528
875
555
36
323
204
360
227
419
264
530
331
588
367
622
388
764
460
809
500
851
525
37
307
188
343
210
399
244
504
306
565
343
597
362
731
424
788
474
829
498
SPAN
38
293
175
327
195
380
226
480
284
541
320
572
338
696
393
768
439
807
472
IN
FEET
39
279
162
312
182
363
210
457
263
516
297
545
314
663
363
737
406
787
449
40
267
152
298
169
347
196
437
245
491
276
520
292
632
337
702
378
768
418
41
255
141
285
158
331
182
417
228
468
257
497
272
602
313
668
351
734
388
42
244
132
273
148
317
171
399
211
446
239
475
254
574
292
637
326
701
361
46
207
102
231
114
269
132
334
161
373
182
400
196
480
223
533
249
590
276
47
199
96
222
107
258
124
320
152
357
171
384
184
460
209
511
234
567
259
48
191
90
214
101
248
117
307
142
343
161
369
173
441
196
490
220
544
243
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
24K Series Truss Joist / Vulcraft or Equial

DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
20
20.02
40.0
JOIST SPAN
JOIST SPACING
=
=
60
6
ft
ft
no
PLASTER CEILING ?
( 1 = YES, 0 = NO )
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
SELF LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
=
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
120
120
16.0
256
CODE
JOIST
DEPTH
WT,lbs/ft
SPAN
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
psf
psf
psf
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
lbs / ft
TRIAL CODE 1 THRU 8
==>
USE 24K12 @ 6 ft oc
1. STRENGTH CHECK:
ACTUAL
TOTAL LOAD,
256.12
# / ft =><
ALLOW
325
2. DEFLECTION CHECK
ACTUAL
LIVE LOAD, lbs / ft
=>
120
ALLOW
153
<
ok
(
= L / 360 )
STANDARD LOAD TABLES / OPEN WEB STEEL JOISTS K-SERIES

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
24K4
24K5
24K6
24K7
24K8
24K9 24K10
24K12
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
8.4
9.3
9.7
10.1
11.5
12
13.1
16
520
516
479
456
442
405
410
361
381
323
354
290
331
262
310
237
290
215
273
196
257
179
242
164
229
150
216
138
205
128
195
118
185
109
176
101
168
94
160
88
153
82
146
76
139
71
133
67
128
63
550
544
540
511
499
453
462
404
429
362
400
325
373
293
349
266
327
241
308
220
290
201
273
184
258
169
244
155
231
143
219
132
208
122
198
114
189
106
180
98
172
92
164
86
157
80
150
75
144
70
550
544
550
520
543
493
503
439
467
393
435
354
406
319
380
289
357
262
335
239
315
218
297
200
281
183
266
169
252
156
239
144
227
133
216
124
206
115
196
107
187
100
179
93
171
87
164
82
157
77
550
544
550
520
550
499
550
479
521
436
485
392
453
353
424
320
397
290
373
205
351
242
331
221
313
203
296
187
281
172
266
159
253
148
241
137
229
127
219
118
209
110
199
103
191
97
183
90
175
85
550
544
550
520
550
499
550
479
550
456
536
429
500
387
468
350
439
318
413
289
388
264
366
242
346
222
327
205
310
189
294
174
280
161
266
150
253
139
242
130
231
121
220
113
211
106
202
99
194
93
550
544
550
520
550
499
550
479
550
456
550
436
544
419
510
379
478
344
449
313
423
286
399
262
377
241
356
222
338
204
320
189
304
175
290
162
276
151
263
140
251
131
240
122
230
114
220
107
211
101
550
544
550
520
550
499
550
479
550
456
550
436
550
422
550
410
549
393
532
368
502
337
473
308
447
283
423
260
401
240
380
222
361
206
344
191
327
177
312
165
298
154
285
144
272
135
261
126
250
118
550
544
550
520
550
499
550
479
550
456
550
436
550
422
550
410
549
393
532
368
516
344
501
324
487
306
474
290
461
275
449
261
438
247
427
235
417
224
406
213
387
199
370
185
354
174
339
163
325
153
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
ok
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Joist Girder / Vulcraft or Equial
DEAD LOAD
LIVE LOAD
TOTAL LOAD
=
=
=
15
20
35
psf
psf
psf
JOIST SPAN
NO. OF JOIST SPACES
=
=
40
15
ft
GIRDER DEPTH
GIRDER SPAN
=
=
72 in
100 ft
JOIST SPACING
PANEL LOAD
GIRDER SELF LOAD
=
=
=
6.67 ft
9.3 kips
111 lbs / ft
(USE
10.0 kips )
USE 72G 15N 10K JOIST GIRDER

Where
72 G
Depth
15 N
No. of spaces
10 K
Load on each panel point
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Steel Stair Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th
COLUMN SECTION (Tube or Pipe)

Tube
=>
rmin
3.37
1.52
0.23
4.00
=>
W16X26
FLOOR BEAM - 1
A
7.68
Ix
Sx
15.70
301.00
38.40
=>
MC8X8.5
STRINGER - 1 (Channel or Tube)

Channel
A
2.50
Ix
Sx
8.00
23.30
5.82
STRINGER - 2 (Channel or Tube)

Channel
A
6.08
=>
A
5.51
Ix
Sx
12.00
129.00
21.50
=>
A
5.51
DIMENTIONS
H =
L1 =
Ix
Sx
8.00
43.90
11.00
=>
C8X18.75
Ix
Sx
8.00
43.90
11.00
16
12
ft, story Ht
ft
L2 =
ft
L3 =
10
ft
NUMBER OF STORIES
GRAVITY LOAD
C8X18.75
LANDING BEAM - 2 (Channel or Tube)

Channel
C12X20.7
LANDING BEAM - 1 (Channel or Tube)

Channel
HSS4X4X1/4
n =
DL =
LL =
50
100
2
psf
psf
THE STAIR DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
STRINGER - 1
=
33.69 deg, from horizontal
w = 0.25 (DL / Cos + LL) L3 =
400
R = 0.5 w L1 =
2.40
M = w L12 / 8 =
7.20
ft-kips
fb = M / Sx =
14.85
ksi
21.60
ksi
>
Fb = 0.6 Fy =
E =
29000
ksi
LL = 5 (wLL Cos ) (L1 / Cos )4 / (384 E I) =
<
(L1 / Cos ) / 240 =
plf , projected
kips
0.72
fb
[Satisfactory]
0.46
in
in
[Satisfactory]
LANDING BEAM - 1
w = 0.5 (DL + LL) L2 =
450
plf
P =
2.40
kips, from STRINGER - 1
R = 0.5 w L3 + P =
4.65
kips
M = w L32 / 8 + P L3 / 2 =
17.63
fb = M / Sx =
19.23
ksi
Fb = 0.6 Fy =
21.60
ksi
ft-kips
>
LL = 5 wLL L34 / (384 E I) + PLL L33 / (24 E I) =
<
L3 / 240 =
0.50
in
fb
[Satisfactory]
0.14
in
[Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
STRINGER - 2
w =
400
plf , projected, from STRINGER - 1
P =
4.65
kips, from LANDING BEAM - 1
RL = [w L1 (0.5 L1 + L2) + P L2] / (L1 + L2) =
4.75
kips
RR = [w L1 (0.5 L1) + P L1] / (L1 + L2) =
4.70
kips
fb
[Satisfactory]
X = RL / w =
11.87
2
ft, from left
Mmax = RL X - (0.5 w X ) =
28.21
fb = Mmax / Sx =
15.75
ksi
Fb = 0.6 Fy =
21.60
ksi
ft-kips
>
LL = 5 wLL (L1 + L2) / (384 E I) + PLL (L1 +L2) / (48 E I) =
<
(L1 + L2) / 240 =
0.90
in
0.24
[Satisfactory]
LANDING BEAM - 2
w =
450
R = 0.5 w L3 =
2
plf, from LANDING BEAM - 1

2.25
kips
M = w L3 / 8 =
5.63
ft-kips
fb = M / Sx =
6.14
ksi
27.60
ksi
Fb = 0.6 Fy =
LL = 5 wLL L3 / (384 E I) =
<
L3 / 240 =
>
0.05
in
0.50
in
fb
[Satisfactory]
[Satisfactory]
FLOOR BEAM - 1
L
w
P
R
=
12
ft
=
600
plf, floor gravity load
= P1 + P2 =
4.80 kips, total point loads, from STRINGER - 1
= 0.5 w L + 0.5 P =
6.00
kips
M = w L2 / 8 + P L3 / 4 =
25.21
fb = M / Sx =
7.88
ksi
33.00
ksi
Fb = 0.66 Fy =
4
ft-kips
>
fb
LL = 5 wLL L / (384 E I) + PLL L / (48 E I) =
<
L / 240 =
0.60
[Satisfactory]
0.04
in
in
[Satisfactory]
COLUMN
P =
6.95
R =nP=
KL = H =
K =
1.0
kips
13.90
16
Fy =
ksi
46
Cc = (22Es/Fy)0.5 =
K /r=
126
F = (K / r) / Cc =
Fa =
12
kips
ft
112
1.13
(1-F /2)Fy / (5/3+3F/8-F /8) =

2
12 Es/[23(K /r) ] =
Rallow = A Fa =
31.60
kips
>
N/A
kis, for Cc > (K /r)
9.38

R
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wind Analysis for Low-rise Building, Based on ASCE 7-98

INPUT DATA
Exposure category (A,,B, C or D)
Importance factor, pg 55, (0.87, 1.0 or 1.15)
Basic wind speed
Topographic factor (Sec.6.5.7.2, pg 29 & 39)
I
V
Kzt
he
hr
L
B
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
B
1.00
90
1
35
39
100
60
Building height to eave

Building height to ridge
Building length
Building width
50
Effective area of components
Category II
mph
Flat
ft
ft
ft
ft
2
ft
DESIGN SUMMARY
Max horizontal force normal to building length, L, face
Max horizontal force normal to building length, B, face
Max total horizontal force at wind with any angle to building
Max total upward force
=
=
=
=
39.00
22.20
39.00
60.48
kips
kips
kips
kips
ANALYSIS
Velocity pressure
qh = 0.00256 Kh Kzt Kd V2 I
where:
13.08
psf
qh = velocity pressure at mean roof height, h. (Eq. 6-13, page 30)

Kh = velocity pressure exposure coefficient evaluated at height, h, (Tab. 6-5, Case 1,pg 60)
Kd = wind directionality factor. (Tab. 6-6, for building, page 61)
=
=
h = mean roof height
0.74
0.85
37.00 ft
< 60 ft, [Satisfactory]
Design pressures for MWFRS
p = qh [(G Cpf )-(G Cpi )]

where:
p = pressure in appropriate zone. (Eq. 6-16, page 32).

G Cp f = product of gust effect factor and external pressure coefficient, see table below. (Fig. 6-4, page 43)
G Cp i = product of gust effect factor and internal pressure coefficient.(Tab. 6-7, Enclosed Building, page 62)
=
0.18
or
-0.18
a = width of edge strips, Fig 6-4, note 7, page 43, (IBC 1609.6.3), MAX[ MIN(0.1B, 0.4h), 0.04B,3] =
Net Pressures (psf), Case A

Roof angle =
Surface
1
2
3
4
1E
2E
3E
4E
G Cp f
0.42
-0.69
-0.39
-0.31
0.64
-1.07
-0.56
-0.47
6.00
Net Pressures (psf), Case B

7.59
Net Pressure with
(+GCp i )
(-GCp i )
3.17
-11.38
-7.44
-6.46
6.05
-16.35
-9.65
-8.45
7.88
-6.67
-2.73
-1.76
10.76
-11.64
-4.94
-3.74
Roof angle =
G Cp f
0.40
-0.69
-0.37
-0.29
0.61
-1.07
-0.53
-0.43
0.00
Net Pressure with
(+GCp i )
(-GCp i )
2.88
-11.38
-7.19
-6.15
5.62
-16.35
-9.29
-7.98
7.59
-6.67
-2.48
-1.44
10.33
-11.64
-4.58
-3.27
Surface
G Cp f
1
2
3
4
5
6
1E
2E
3E
4E
5E
6E
-0.45
-0.69
-0.37
-0.45
0.40
-0.29
-0.48
-1.07
-0.53
-0.48
0.61
-0.43
Net Pressure with
(+GCp i ) (-GCp i )
-8.24
-11.38
-7.19
-8.24
2.88
-6.15
-8.63
-16.35
-9.29
-8.63
5.62
-7.98
-3.53
-6.67
-2.48
-3.53
7.59
-1.44
-3.92
-11.64
-4.58
-3.92
10.33
-3.27
ft
Case A @ (a) CORNER I

Surface
1
2
3
4
1E
2E
3E
4E
10 psf min.
Sec. 6.1.4.1
Area
Case A @ (b) CORNER II
Pressure (k) with
(ft )
(+GCp i )
(-GCp i )
3080
2663
2663
3080
420
363
363
420
Horiz.
Vert.
Horiz.
Vert.
9.77
-30.30
-19.82
-19.91
2.54
-5.94
-3.50
-3.55
34.06
-59.04
39.00
-60.00
24.27
-17.76
-7.28
-5.41
4.52
-4.23
-1.79
-1.57
34.06
-30.79
39.00
-60.00
Surface
1
2
3
4
1E
2E
3E
4E
10 psf min.
Sec. 6.1.4.1
Case B @ (a) CORNER I

Surface
1
2
3
4
5
6
1E
2E
3E
4E
5E
6E
10 psf min.
Sec. 6.1.4.1
Area
Pressure (k) with
(ft )
(+GCp i )
(-GCp i )
1790
2421
2421
1790
430
605
605
430
Horiz.
Vert.
Horiz.
Vert.
5.15
-27.55
-17.42
-11.01
2.42
-9.90
-5.62
-3.43
22.00
-59.95
22.20
-60.00
13.58
-16.15
-6.02
-2.58
4.44
-7.05
-2.77
-1.40
22.00
-31.70
22.20
-60.00
Case B @ (b) CORNER II
Pressure (k) with
(ft )
(+GCp i )
(-GCp i )
3080
2663
2663
3080
2008
2008
420
363
363
420
212
212
Horiz.
Vert.
Horiz.
Vert.
-25.38
-30.30
-19.16
-25.38
5.78
-12.34
-3.63
-5.94
-3.37
-3.63
1.19
-1.69
21.01
-58.77
22.20
-60.00
-10.88
-17.76
-6.62
-10.88
15.23
-2.89
-1.65
-4.23
-1.66
-1.65
2.19
-0.69
21.01
-30.27
22.20
-60.00
Area
Surface
1
2
3
4
5
6
1E
2E
3E
4E
5E
6E
10 psf min.
Sec. 6.1.4.1
Area
Pressure (k) with
(ft )
(+GCp i )
(-GCp i )
1790
2421
2421
1790
3290
3290
430
605
605
430
210
210
Horiz.
Vert.
Horiz.
Vert.
-14.75
-27.55
-17.42
-14.75
9.47
-20.22
-3.71
-9.90
-5.62
-3.71
1.18
-1.68
32.55
-60.48
39.00
-60.00
-6.32
-16.15
-6.02
-6.32
24.96
-4.73
-1.69
-7.05
-2.77
-1.69
2.17
-0.69
32.55
-31.98
39.00
-60.00
Design pressures for components and cladding
p = qh[ (G Cp) - (G Cpi)]

where:
p = pressure on component. (Eq. 6-18, pg 32)

pmin = 10 psf (Sec. 6.1.4.2).
G Cp = external pressure coefficient.
see table below. (Fig. 6-5, page 44 ~ 47)
Effective
Area (ft2)
Comp.
50
Comp. & Cladding

Pressure
( psf )
Zone 1
GCP
- GCP
0.23
-0.93
GCP
Zone 2
- GCP
GCP
- GCP
0.23
-1.31
0.23
-1.61
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 3
Zone 4
GCP
- GCP
Zone 5
GCP
- GCP
0.79
-0.88
0.79
-1.04
(Walls reduced 10 %, Fig. 6-5A note 5.)
Zone 4
Zone 5
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
10.00
-14.52
10.00
-19.50
10.00
-23.43
12.67
-13.85
12.67
-15.93
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wind Analysis for Building with h > 60 ft, Based on ASCE 7-98
INPUT DATA

Importance factor (0.87, 1.0 or 1.15)
Basic wind speed
Topographic factor (Sec.6.5.7.2)
Building height to roof
Parapet height
Building length
Building width
Effective area of mullion
I
V
Kzt
H
HP
L
B
AM
Effective area of panel
AP
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
B
1.00
90
1
108
0
100
50
55
Category II, page 55

mph
Flat, page 29 & 39
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft2
27
ft2
DESIGN SUMMARY
Max building horizontal force normal to building length, L, face

Max base moment at wind normal to building length, L, face
Max building horizontal force normal to building length, B, face
Max base moment at wind normal to building length, B, face
Max building upward force
Max building torsion force
=
=
=
=
=
=
187.7
11595.0
77.5
5234.5
78.7
586.6
kips
ft - kips
kips
ft - kips
kips
ft - kips
ANALYSIS
Velocity pressures
qz = 0.00256 Kz Kzt Kd V2 I
where:
qz = velocity pressure at height, z. (Eq. 6-13, page 30)

Kz = velocity pressure exposure coefficient evaluated at height, z. (Tab. 6-5, Case 2, page 60)
z = hetght above ground
0.85
z (ft)
Kz
0 - 15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
108
0.57
0.62
0.66
0.70
0.76
0.81
0.85
0.89
0.93
0.96
0.99
1.01
qz (psf)
10.05
10.93
11.63
12.34
13.40
14.28
14.98
15.69
16.39
16.92
17.45
17.80
z (ft)
Kz
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
1.01
1.01
1.01
1.01
1.01
1.01
1.01
1.01
1.01
1.01
qz (psf)
17.80
17.80
17.80
17.80
17.80
17.80
17.80
17.80
17.80
17.80
0.18
or
p = q G Cp - qh (G Cpi)
where:
p = pressure on surface for rigid building with all h. (Eq. 6-15, page 31).
q = qz for windward wall at height z above the ground, see table above.
G Cp i = internal pressure coefficient. (Tab. 6-7, Enclosed Building, page 62)
qh = qz value at mean roof height, h, for leeward wall, side walls, and roof.
G = gust effect factor for rigid (Sec. 6.5.8.1, Page 29) =
Cp = external pressure coefficient, see right down tables.
Fig. 6-3 fo < 10o, page 42
0.85
Roof
h/B
Distance
Cp
2.16
2.16
2.16
2.16
h/L
1.08
1.08
1.08
1.08
50
50
50
50
Distance
54
100
100
100
-1.04
Direction
All
L/B
All
Cp
0.80
Leedward Wall
To L Dir
0.50
-0.50
Leedward Wall
Side Wall
To B Dir
All
2.00
All
-0.30
-0.70
To L Face
To L Face
To L Face
To L Face
Roof
To B Face
To B Face
To B Face
To B Face
Cp
-1.04
-0.70
Fig. 6-3, page 42

Wall
Windward Wall
q G Cp Figure for Gable, Hip Roof, page 41
-0.18
(cont'd)
Hence, MWFRS Net Pressures are given by following tables (Sec. 6.5.12.3, Page 32)
Windward Wall
Surface
z (ft)
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
0 - 15
20
25
30
3.63
4.23
4.71
5.19
40
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
Surface
z (ft)
10.04
10.64
11.11
11.59
Side Wall
All
5.90
12.31
Surface
z (ft)
GCPi
50
60
70
80
6.50
6.98
7.46
7.94
12.91
13.39
13.87
14.35
Leeward
All
-10.77
90
8.30
14.71
Surface
100
108
8.66
8.90
15.07
15.31
Base Forces
Normal to L Face
Normal to L Face
Dist. (ft)
0 - 50
-13.80
-7.39
P (psf) with
- GCPi
-4.36
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
-18.94
Normal to B Face
Case 1
Case 2
Wind with Angle

Case 3
Case 4
All
Normal to B Face
Surface
Dist. (ft)
0 - 54
100
(kips)
188
164
78
68
152
133
(ft - kips)
11595
10149
5235
4581
9541
8336
Fig. 6-9
TBase
(ft - kips)
587
242
475
Page 54
79
69
67
58
77
68
(kips)
108
108
54
54
122
121
Sec. 6.1.4.1
FUp,min (kips)
50
50
50
50
50
50
( 10 psf )
p = q (G Cp) - qi (G Cpi)
where:
p = pressure on component for building with h > 60 ft. (Eq. 6-19, page 32).
pmin = 10 psf (Sec. 6.1.4.2, page 23).

G Cp i = internal pressure coefficient. (Tab. 6-7) =
a = Zone width = MAX[ MIN(0.1B, 0.1L), 3] =
5.0
G Cp = external pressure coefficient. (Fig. 6-8, page 53)
Wall
Comp.
0 - 15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
108
Zone 5
Actual Effective
2
Area ( ft )
GCP
- GCP
GCP
- GCP
55
27
0.81
0.87
-0.84
-0.88
0.81
0.87
-1.55
-1.73
Mullion
Panel
z (ft)
0.18
or
-0.18
ft, (Fig 6-8 note 8, pg 53)
Zone 4
Mullion Pressure (psf)

Zone 4
Zone 5
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
-7.74
-1.34
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
-18.94
-13.80
-12.53
-7.39
Figure 6-9, page 54

ASCE-7
VBase
Vmin
Leeward
Roof
MBase
FUpward (kips)
z (ft)
-12.53
Roof
Normal to L Face
Case 1
Case 2
Normal to B Face
Surface
Panel Pressure (psf)

Zone 4
Zone 5
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
10.00
10.77
11.47
12.16
13.20
14.07
14.77
15.46
16.16
16.68
17.20
17.55
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
-18.11
10.00
11.50
12.24
12.98
14.09
15.02
15.76
16.50
17.24
17.80
18.36
18.73
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
-30.77
10.57
11.50
12.24
12.98
14.09
15.02
15.76
16.50
17.24
17.80
18.36
18.73
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
-18.89
10.57
11.50
12.24
12.98
14.09
15.02
15.76
16.50
17.24
17.80
18.36
18.73
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
-33.92
cont'd
Roof
Effective
Area ( ft2 )
Components and Cladding
Zone 1
Zone 3
- GCP
- GCP
- GCP
-1.40
-2.30
-3.20
10
-1.40
-2.30
-3.20
59
-1.17
-1.98
-2.79
-2.65
108
-1.10
-1.87
157
-1.05
-1.81
206
-1.01
-1.76
255
-0.99
-1.72
304
-0.96
-1.69
353
-0.94
-1.66
402
-0.93
-1.64
451
-0.91
500
-0.90
3600
-0.90
3600
Roof
Zone 2
Effective
Area ( ft2 )
400
75
Net Pressure (psf)

Zone 1
Zone 2
-28.13
-44.15
Zone 3
-60.17
10
-28.13
-44.15
-60.17
59
-24.09
-38.49
-52.90
108
-22.71
-36.57
-50.42
157
-21.86
-35.38
206
-21.24
-34.51
255
-20.76
-33.83
304
-20.36
-33.27
353
-20.02
-32.80
402
-19.72
-32.38
451
-19.46
500
-19.23
3600
-19.23
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wind Analysis for Low-rise Building, Based on ASCE 7-02

INPUT DATA
Importance factor, pg 73, (0.87, 1.0 or 1.15)
Basic wind speed
Topographic factor (Sec.6.5.7.2, pg 30 & 47)
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
I
V
Kzt
he
hr
L
B
A

Building length
Building width
Effective area of components
B
1.00
90
1
35
39
100
60
50
Category II
mph
Flat
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft2
68
DESIGN SUMMARY
Max horizontal force normal to building length, L, face
Max horizontal force normal to building length, B, face
Max total horizontal torsional load
Max total upward force
=
=
=
=
39.00
22.20
422.21
60.00
kips
kips
ft-kips
kips
ANALYSIS
Velocity pressure
qh = 0.00256 Kh Kzt Kd V2 I
where:
13.08
psf
qh = velocity pressure at mean roof height, h. (Eq. 6-15, page 31)

Kh = velocity pressure exposure coefficient evaluated at height, h, (Tab. 6-3, Case 1,pg 75)

h = mean roof height
=
=
0.74
0.85
37.00 ft
< 60 ft, [Satisfactory]
p = qh [(G Cpf )-(G Cpi )]

where:
p = pressure in appropriate zone. (Eq. 6-18, page 32).

G Cp f = product of gust effect factor and external pressure coefficient, see table below. (Fig. 6-10, page 55 & 56)
G Cp i = product of gust effect factor and internal pressure coefficient.(Fig. 6-5, Enclosed Building, page 49)
=
0.18
or
-0.18
a = width of edge strips, Fig 6-0, note 9, page 56, MAX[ MIN(0.1B, 0.4h), 0.04B,3] =
6.00
(IBC Fig.1609.6.2.2, footnote 5)
Net Pressures (psf), Basic Load Cases

Roof angle =
7.59
Surface
1
2
3
4
1E
2E
3E
4E
5
6
G Cp f
0.42
-0.69
-0.39
-0.31
0.64
-1.07
-0.56
-0.47
-0.45
-0.45
Net Pressure with
(+GCp i )
3.17
-11.38
-7.44
-6.46
6.05
-16.35
-9.65
-8.45
-8.24
-8.24
(-GCp i )
7.88
-6.67
-2.73
-1.76
10.76
-11.64
-4.94
-3.74
-3.53
-3.53
Roof angle = 0.00

G Cp f
0.40
-0.69
-0.37
-0.29
0.61
-1.07
-0.53
-0.43
-0.45
-0.45
Net Pressure with
(+GCp i )
2.88
-11.38
-7.19
-6.15
5.62
-16.35
-9.29
-7.98
-8.24
-8.24
(-GCp i )
7.59
-6.67
-2.48
-1.44
10.33
-11.64
-4.58
-3.27
-3.53
-3.53
ft
Net Pressures (psf), Torsional Load Cases

Roof angle = 7.59
Surface
1T
2T
3T
4T
Surface
1T
2T
3T
4T
G Cp f
Net Pressure with
(+GCp i ) (-GCp i )
0.42
0.79
1.97
-0.69
-2.84
-1.67
-0.39
-1.86
-0.68
-0.31
-1.62
-0.44
Roof angle = 0.00
G Cp f
0.40
-0.69
-0.37
-0.29
Net Pressure with
(+GCp i ) (-GCp i )
0.72
1.90
-2.84
-1.67
-1.80
-0.62
-1.54
-0.36
Basic Load Cases in Transverse Direction

Surface
1
2
3
4
1E
2E
3E
4E
10 psf min.
Sec. 6.1.4.1
Area
(ft2)
3080
2663
2663
3080
420
363
363
420
Horiz.
Vert.
Horiz.
Vert.
Basic Load Cases in Longitudinal Direction
Pressure (k) with
(+GCp i )
9.77
-30.30
-19.82
-19.91
2.54
-5.94
-3.50
-3.55
34.06
-59.04
39.00
-60.00
Surface
(-GCp i )
24.27
-17.76
-7.28
-5.41
4.52
-4.23
-1.79
-1.57
34.06
-30.79
39.00
-60.00
1
2
3
4
1E
2E
3E
4E
10 psf min.
Sec. 6.1.4.1
Torsional Load Cases in Transverse Direction

Surface
Area
Pressure (k) with
(ft2)
1790
2421
2421
1790
430
605
605
430
Horiz.
Vert.
Horiz.
Vert.
(+GCp i )
5.15
-27.55
-17.42
-11.01
2.42
-9.90
-5.62
-3.43
22.00
-59.95
22.20
-60.00
(-GCp i )
13.58
-16.15
-6.02
-2.58
4.44
-7.05
-2.77
-1.40
22.00
-31.70
22.20
-60.00
Torsional Load Cases in Longitudinal Direction
Torsion (ft-k)
Pressure (k) with
Area
Area
Surface
(+GCp i ) (-GCp i ) (+GCp i ) (-GCp i )

1
1330
4.22
10.48
93
231
2
1150
-13.09
-7.67
-38
-22
3
1150
-8.56
-3.14
25
9
4
1330
-8.60
-2.33
189
51
1E
420
2.54
4.52
112
199
2E
363
-5.94
-4.23
-35
-25
3E
363
-3.50
-1.79
20
10
4E
420
-3.55
-1.57
156
69
1T
1750
1.39
3.45
-35
-86
2T
1513
-4.30
-2.52
14
8
3T
1513
-2.82
-1.03
-9
-3
4T
1750
-2.83
-0.77
-71
-19
Total Horiz. Torsional Load, MT
422
422
Pressure (k) with
Torsion (ft-k)
(+GCp i ) (-GCp i ) (+GCp i ) (-GCp i )

1
680
1.96
5.16
17
46
2
1816
-20.66
-12.11
68
40
3
1816
-13.06
-4.51
-43
-15
4
680
-4.18
-0.98
37
9
1E
430
2.42
4.44
58
106
2E
605
-9.90
-7.05
33
23
3E
605
-5.62
-2.77
-19
-9
4E
430
-3.43
-1.40
82
34
1T
1110
0.80
2.10
-12
-31
2T
2421
-6.89
-4.04
-46
-27
3T
2421
-4.35
-1.50
29
10
4T
1110
-1.71
-0.40
-25
-6
Total Horiz. Torsional Load, MT
180.3
180.3
(ft2)
(ft2)
p = qh[ (G Cp) - (G Cpi)]

where:
p = pressure on component. (Eq. 6-22, pg 33)

pmin = 10 psf (Sec. 6.1.4.2).
G Cp = external pressure coefficient.
see table below. (Fig. 6-11, page 57~60)
Effective
Area (ft2)
Comp.
50
Comp. & Cladding

Pressure
( psf )
Zone 1
GCP
- GCP
0.36
-0.83
Zone 1
GCP
Zone 2
- GCP
GCP
Zone 3
- GCP
0.36
-1.61
0.36
-1.61
Zone 2
Zone 4
GCP
- GCP
Zone 5
GCP
- GCP
0.79
-0.88
0.79
-1.04
(Walls reduced 10 %, Fig. 6-11A note 5.)
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
10.00
-13.21
10.00
-23.42
10.00
-23.42
12.67
-13.85
12.67
-15.93
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wind Analysis for Building with h > 60 ft, Based on ASCE 7-02
INPUT DATA
Exposure category (B, C or D)

Importance factor (0.87, 1.0 or 1.15)
Basic wind speed
Topographic factor (Sec.6.5.7.2)
Building height to roof
Parapet height
Building length
Building width
Effective area of mullion
I
V
Kzt
H
HP
L
B
AM
Effective area of panel
AP
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
B
1.00
90
1
68
4
300
180
55
Category II, page 73

mph
Flat, page 30 & 47
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft2
27
ft2
DESIGN SUMMARY
Max building horizontal force normal to building length, L, face

Max overturning moment at wind normal to building length, L, face
Max building horizontal force normal to building length, B, face
Max overturning moment at wind normal to building length, B, face
Max building upward force
Max building torsion force
=
=
=
=
=
=
337.1
44925.2
179.0
31505.9
605.9
11377.5
kips
ft - kips
kips
ft - kips
kips
ft - kips
ANALYSIS
Velocity pressures
qz = 0.00256 Kz Kzt Kd V2 I
where:
qz = velocity pressure at height, z. (Eq. 6-15, page 31)

Kz = velocity pressure exposure coefficient evaluated at height, z. (Tab. 6-3, Case 2, page 75)
z = hetght above ground
0.85
z (ft)
Kz
0 - 15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
72
72
72
72
0.57
0.62
0.66
0.70
0.76
0.81
0.85
0.89
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
qz (psf)
10.05
10.93
11.63
12.34
13.40
14.28
14.98
15.69
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
z (ft)
Kz
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
qz (psf)
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
0.18
or
p = q G Cp - qh (G Cpi)
where:
p = pressure on surface for rigid building with all h. (Eq. 6-17, page 32).
G Cp i = internal pressure coefficient. (Fig. 6-5, Enclosed Building, page 49)
G = gust effect factor for rigid (Sec. 6.5.8.1, Page 30) =
Cp = external pressure coefficient, see right down tables.
Fig. 6-6 fo < 10o, page 50
0.85
Roof
h/B
Distance
Cp
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
h/L
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
36
72
144
180
Distance
36
72
144
300
-0.90
-0.90
-0.50
-0.30
Cp
-0.90
-0.90
-0.50
-0.30
Direction
All
L/B
All
Cp
0.80
Leedward Wall
To L Dir
0.60
-0.50
Leedward Wall
Side Wall
To B Dir
All
1.67
All
-0.37
-0.70
To L Face
To L Face
To L Face
To L Face
Roof
To B Face
To B Face
To B Face
60
To B Face
Fig. 6-6, page 50

Wall
Windward Wall
q G Cp Figure for Gable, Hip Roof, page 50
-0.18
(cont'd)
Hence, MWFRS Net Pressures are given by following tables (Sec. 6.5.12.3, Page 32)
Windward Wall
Surface
z (ft)
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
0 - 15
20
25
30
3.98
4.58
5.06
5.54
40
50
60
70
72
Base Forces
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
Surface
z (ft)
9.68
10.28
10.76
11.24
Side Wall
All
6.26
11.96
Surface
z (ft)
GCPi
6.86
7.34
7.82
7.91
12.56
13.04
13.52
13.61
Leeward
All
-9.58
Normal to L Face
Normal to L Face
Normal to L Face
Case 1
Case 2
Surface
Dist. (ft)
Roof
0 - 36
72
144
180
Normal to B Face
Case 1
Case 2
-12.27
-6.57
P (psf) with
- GCPi
-3.88
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
-14.96
-14.96
-9.58
-6.89
Wind with Angle

Case 3
Case 4
-9.26
-9.26
-3.88
-1.19
Leeward
All
Normal to B Face
Surface
Dist. (ft)
Roof
0 - 36
72
144
300
(kips)
337
253
179
134
387
215
(ft - kips)
44925
33694
31506
23629
57323
30893
Fig. 6-9
MT
(ft - kips)
11378
3625
11262
Page 54
450
338
357
268
606
324
(kips)
216
216
130
130
259
252
Sec. 6.1.4.1
FUp,min (kips)
540
540
540
540
540
540
( 10 psf )
p = q (G Cp) - qi (G Cpi)
where:
p = pressure on component for building with h > 60 ft. (Eq. 6-23, page 33).
pmin = 10 psf (Sec. 6.1.4.2, page 23).

G Cp i = internal pressure coefficient. (Fig. 6-5) =
a = Zone width = MAX[ MIN(0.1B, 0.1L), 3] =
18.0
G Cp = external pressure coefficient. (Fig. 6-17, page 67)
Wall
Comp.
0 - 15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
72
Zone 5
Actual Effective
2
Area ( ft )
GCP
- GCP
GCP
- GCP
55
27
0.81
0.87
-0.84
-0.88
0.81
0.87
-1.55
-1.73
Mullion
Panel
z (ft)
0.18
or
-0.18
ft, (Fig 6-17 note 8, pg 67)
Zone 4
Mullion Pressure (psf)

Zone 4
Zone 5
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
-7.78
-2.08
P (psf) with
GCPi
- GCPi
-14.96
-14.96
-9.58
-6.89
-9.26
-9.26
-3.88
-1.19
Figure 6-9, page 54
VBase
Vmin
z (ft)
ASCE-7
MBase
FUpward (kips)
Normal to B Face
Surface
Panel Pressure (psf)

Zone 4
Zone 5
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
10.00
10.77
11.47
12.16
13.20
14.07
14.77
15.46
15.60
-16.10
-16.10
-16.10
-16.10
-16.10
-16.10
-16.10
-16.10
-16.10
10.00
11.50
12.24
12.98
14.09
15.02
15.76
16.50
16.65
-27.36
-27.36
-27.36
-27.36
-27.36
-27.36
-27.36
-27.36
-27.36
10.57
11.50
12.24
12.98
14.09
15.02
15.76
16.50
16.65
-16.80
-16.80
-16.80
-16.80
-16.80
-16.80
-16.80
-16.80
-16.80
10.57
11.50
12.24
12.98
14.09
15.02
15.76
16.50
16.65
-30.16
-30.16
-30.16
-30.16
-30.16
-30.16
-30.16
-30.16
-30.16
cont'd
Roof
Effective
Area ( ft2 )
Zone 1
Zone 3
- GCP
- GCP
- GCP
-1.40
-2.30
-3.20
10
-1.40
-2.30
-3.20
59
-1.17
-1.98
-2.79
108
-1.10
-1.87
-2.65
157
-1.05
-1.81
-2.57
206
-1.01
-1.76
-2.50
255
-0.99
-1.72
-2.45
304
-0.96
-1.69
-2.41
353
-0.94
-1.66
-2.38
402
-0.93
-1.64
-2.35
451
-0.91
-1.62
-2.32
500
-0.90
-1.60
-2.30
38016
-0.90
-1.60
-2.30
4104
972
38016
Roof
Zone 2
Effective
Area ( ft2 )
Net Pressure (psf)

Zone 1
Zone 2
-25.01
-39.25
Zone 3
-53.50
10
-25.01
-39.25
-53.50
59
-21.42
-34.23
-47.03
108
-20.19
-32.51
-44.83
157
-19.44
-31.45
-43.47
206
-18.89
-30.68
-42.48
255
-18.46
-30.08
-41.70
304
-18.10
-29.58
-41.06
353
-17.80
-29.16
-40.52
402
-17.54
-28.79
-40.05
451
-17.30
-28.47
-39.63
500
-17.09
-28.17
-39.25
38016
-17.09
-28.17
-39.25
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Wind Analysis Based on UBC 1997

INPUT DATA
Exposure category
Importance category
Basic wind speed
Building length
Building width
V
he
hr
L
B
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2
2
100
14
28
150
110
Exp. C
Hazardous
mph
ft
ft
ft
ft
DESIGN SUMMARY
Horizontal pressure
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Upward pressure
Total horizontal force on building length
Total horizontal force on building width
Total upward force
Overturning moment on building length
Overturning moment on building width
43.88
40.73
23.63
134.91
65.15
389.83
2384.00
959.94
psf
psf
psf
kips
kips
kips
ft-kips
ft-kips
,for roof
,for wall
ANALYSIS
Importance factor
Mean roof height
Hgt-exp-gust factor
Iw
h
Ce
=
=
=
Stagnation pressure
Pressure coefficients
qs
Cq
=
=
=
1.15
21.0
1.14
1.06
25.7
1.30
0.70
ft
,for roof
,for wall
psf
horizontal any direction
upward
(Method 2, Table 16-H)
ELEMENT & COMPONENT LOADS

Exposure category
Basic wind speed
V=
2
100
Exp. C
mph
he =
14
ft
hr =
28
Building length
L = 150
Building width
B = 110
Width of edge strips (CBC 1622A)
a = MIN(0.1B, 10ft) = 10.00
Iw =
Importance factor
Mean roof height
ft
ft
ft
ft
1.15
21
h=
ft
Hgt-exp-gust factor
Ce = 1.142 ,for roof
Stagnation pressure
Roof slope
qs =
25.7
4 :12
psf
, for continuity
Cq,10 =
1.3
outward
for discontinuity
Cq,10 =
2.6
outward
for overhang
Cq,10 =
3.1
outward ( 2.3 @ top + 0.8 @ bottom )
Pressure coefficients
,(CBC Tab.16A-H)
Cq = Cq,10 - 0.2 + (100-TA) / 450 , (CBC Tab.16A-H, footnote 2)

Cq = Cq,10 - 0.8 + (100-TA) / 112.5 , (only at discontinuities with slope less than 7:12)
Design wind pressures (CBC 1620A)
P = C e C q q s Iw
(CBC 20A-1)
Continuity
outward
Tributary Area (ft2)
Cq
<10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
>100
>1000
1.30
1.30
1.29
1.28
1.27
1.26
1.24
1.23
1.22
1.21
1.20
1.19
1.18
1.17
1.16
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.11
1.10
1.10
P (psf)
44
44
44
43
43
42
42
42
41
41
41
40
40
39
39
39
38
38
38
37
37
Discontinuity
outward
Cq
Cq
P (psf)
2.60
88
3.10
2.60
88
3.10
2.56
86
3.06
2.51
85
3.01
2.47
83
2.97
2.42
82
2.92
2.38
80
2.88
2.33
79
2.83
2.29
77
2.79
2.24
76
2.74
2.20
74
2.70
2.16
73
2.66
2.11
71
2.61
2.07
70
2.57
2.02
68
2.52
1.98
67
2.48
1.93
65
2.43
1.89
64
2.39
1.84
62
2.34
1.80
61
2.30
1.80
61
2.30
use primary frame values
Overhang
outward
P (psf)
105
105
103
102
100
99
97
96
94
93
91
90
88
87
85
84
82
81
79
78
78
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
SEISMIC ANALYSIS BASED ON IBC 2000 (Equivalent Lateral-Force Procedure, Sec.1617.4)
INPUT DATA
Typical floor height

h
wx
Typical floor weight
Number of floors (20 max)
n
IE
Seismic factor (1616.2)
Building location
Zip Code
Site class (A, B, C, D, E, F)
The cofficient (1617.4.2.1)
Ct
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
The cofficient(Tab1617.6)
DESIGN SUMMARY
9.0
ft
780 k
15
1.00
89107
D
(If no soil report, use D)
0.03
Total base shear

V
=
0.04 W, (SD) =
=
0.03 W, (ASD) =
Seismic design category
=
Latitude:
36.170034
Longitude:
-115.20822
SS = 61.812 %g,Sms =
0.807 %g, Fa =
5.50
S1 =
18.366
%g,Sm1
SDS =
0.538
%g ,
hn
135.0
ft
1.34
11,700 k
wxhk
3,932,081
0.379
SD1 =
Ta = Ct (hn)3/4
%g,
Fv =
0.253
453
323
D
k, (SD)
k, (ASD)
1.306
2.065
%g
1.19
VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF LATERAL FORCES

Level
No.
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Level Floor to floor

Name Height
ft
Roof
9.00
15th
9.00
14th
9.00
13th
9.00
12th
9.00
11th
9.00
10th
9.00
9th
9.00
8th
9.00
7th
9.00
6th
9.00
5th
9.00
4th
9.00
3rd
9.00
2nd
9.00
Ground
Heigth
hx
ft
135.0
Weight
wx
k
780
wxhxk
Cvx
569,408
0.145
126.0
780
518,980
0.132
117.0
780
469,778
0.119
108.0
780
421,861
0.107
99.0
780
375,300
0.095
90.0
780
330,175
0.084
81.0
780
286,578
0.073
72.0
780
244,619
0.062
63.0
780
204,430
0.052
54.0
780
166,174
0.042
45.0
780
130,058
0.033
36.0
780
96,357
0.025
27.0
780
65,457
0.017
18.0
780
37,956
0.010
9.0
780
14,951
0.004
0.0
Lateral force @ each level

Fx
Vx
O. M.
k
k
k-ft
65.6
65.6
59.8
590
125.3
54.1
1,718
179.4
48.6
3,333
228.0
43.2
5,385
271.2
38.0
7,826
309.2
33.0
10,609
342.2
28.2
13,689
370.4
23.5
17,022
393.9
19.1
20,567
413.1
15.0
24,285
428.0
11.1
28,137
439.1
7.5
32,089
446.7
4.4
36,109
451.0
1.7
40,169
452.8
44,244
Diaphragm force
Fi
W i
Fpx
k
k
k
65.6
780
66
125.3
1,560
63
179.4
2,340
63
228.0
3,120
63
271.2
3,900
63
309.2
4,680
63
342.2
5,460
63
370.4
6,240
63
393.9
7,020
63
413.1
7,800
63
428.0
8,580
63
439.1
9,360
63
446.7
10,140
63
451.0
10,920
63
452.8
11,700
63
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Seismic Analysis Based on IBC 2000

Base Shear (Derived from IBC 1617.4.1, Pg.360)
V = MAX{ MIN[SD1IE / (RT) , SDS IE / R ] , 0.044SDS IE , 0.5S1 IE / R } W
= MAX{ MIN[ 0.33W , 0.17W ] , 0.05W , 0.05W }

=
=
0.17
0.12
Where
(E or F) & S1>=0.6g only)
W, (SD)
W, (ASD)
SDS =
0.826
(IBC 1615.1.3)
SD1 =
0.469
(IBC 1615.1.3)
R=
(IBC Tab 1617.6, Pg. 365 )
IE =
1.25
(IBC Tab 1604.5, Pg. 297 )
S1 =
0.457
(IBC 1615.1)
hn =
36
CT =
0.02
T = CT (hn)
(3/4)
ft
(0.035 for steel MRF, 0.03 for concrete MRF & steel EBF)
=
0.294
sec, (IBC 16-39, Pg. 361)
Vertical Distribution of Force (IBC 1617.4.3, Pg.361)

Level
Wx
hx
Wxhx
Fx (16-41 & 1642)
36 W 3
V(36kW 3) / W xhxk
Roof
W3
36
3RD
W2
24k
24kW 2
V(24kW 2) / W xhxk
2ND
W1
12k
12kW 1
V(12kW 1) / W xhxk
W
Where
W xhx
k = 1
for T <= 0.5
k = 0.5 T + 0.75
for T @ (0.5 , 2.5)
k = 2
for T >= 2.5
Diaphragm Force for D, E, & F (IBC 1620.3.3, Pg.372), (Note: see 1620.1.5, Pg. 372,for B & C)
Level
Wx
Wx
Fx
Fx
Roof
W3
W3
F3
F3
MAX[Fmin , MIN(Fx W 3 / W x , Fmax )]
3RD
W2
W 2+W 3
F2
F2+F3
2ND
W1
W 1+W 2+W 3
F1
F1+F2+F3
W
Where
Fmin = 0.15 SDS IE W x

Fmax = 0.3 SDS IE W x
Story Drift Determination (IBC 16-46, Pg.362)

x = Cd xe / IE
Where
Cd = IBC Tab. 1617.6, Pg.365
Fpx (16-65)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Redundancy Factor, , Based on IBC 2000

= max ( i ) = 2
20
r max,i Ai
(IBC 1617.2.2)
= apply for SDC D,E, & F of this direction of entire building
where
rmax,i = MAX ( hi / Vi )
hi = the horizontal shear of full height level of the building.
Vi = the total i story shear.
Ai = floor area of the diaphragm level immediately above the story.
BRACED FRAME STRUCTURE

= [1.0 , 1.5]
= max(3rd, 2nd, 1st)
3rd =2-20 / {[max( Pe, Pf, P5, P6) cos / V3rd ] (A2nd)0.5 }
2nd =2-20 / {[max( Pa, Pb, P1, P2) cos / V2nd ] (A1st)0.5 }
1st =2-20 / {[max( Pc, Pd, P3, P4) cos / V1st ] (Aground)0.5 }
MOMENT FRAME STRUCTURE
= [1.0 , 1.25]
= [1.0 , 1.1]
,for SDC D
,for SDC E & F
= max[ 2 - 20 / (r2nd A1st0.5) , 2 - 20 / (r1st Aground0.5) ]

r2nd = max[ (Va+0.7Vb) , 0.7(Vb+Vc) , (Vc+0.7Vd) , (V1+0.7V2) , (0.7V2+V3)] / V2nd
r1st = max[ (Ve+0.7Vf) , 0.7(Vf+Vg) , (Vg+0.7Vh) , (V4+0.7V5) , (0.7V5+V6)] / V1st
BUILDING FRAME SYSTEM WITH SHEAR WALL

= [1.0 , 1.5]
r2nd = max[ 10Va / (V2nd La ) , 10V1 / (V2nd L1 )]
r1st = max[ 10Vb / (V1st Lb ) , 10Vc / (V1st Lc ) , 10V2 / (V1st L2 )]
DUAL SYSTEM
= 0.8 calcs
> 1.0
< 1.5

r2nd = max[ 10Va / (V2nd La ) , Px cos / V2nd , (V1+V2) / V2nd , (V5+V6) / V2nd]
r1st = max[ 10Vb / (V1st Lc ) , Py cos / V1st , (V3+V4) / V1st , (V7+V8) / V1st]
VERTICAL COMBINATION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

2nd , 1st = [1.0 , 1.5]
2nd = U
1st = max( L , RLU / RU)
Note:
1. One direction is bearing wall , the R, 0 , and C d used for the orthogonal should use their direction values.
(IBC 1617.6.3)
2. When a combination of structural systems is used in the same direction , the R, 0 , and C d used be not greater than
the least value. (IBC 1617.6.2)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
SEISMIC ANALYSIS BASED ON IBC 2003 (Equivalent Lateral-Force Procedure, ASCE 9.5.5)
INPUT DATA
Typical floor height

Typical floor weight
Number of floors (20 max)
Seismic factor (IBC Tab.1604.5)
Building location
Site class (A, B, C, D, E, F)
The cofficient (ASCE 9.5.5.3.2)
DESIGN SUMMARY
h=
9.0
ft
wx = 780 k
n=
15
IE = 1.00
Zip Code 89107
D
(If no soil report, use D)
Ct = 0.02
Total base shear

V
=
0.06 W, (SD) =
=
0.04 W, (ASD) =
Seismic design category
=
Latitude:
36.170034
Longitude:
-115.20822
SS = 61.812 %g,Sms =
0.807 %g, Fa =
The cofficient (ASCE 9.5.5.3.2)
x=
0.75
S1 =
18.366
%g,Sm1
The cofficient(IBC Tab. 1617.6.2)
R=
5.50
SDS =
0.538
%g ,
hn
135.0
ft
1.15
11,700 k
wxhk
1,615,216
%g,
0.379
SD1 =
Ta = Ct (hn)
Fv =
0.253
679
485
D
k, (SD)
k, (ASD)
1.306
2.065
%g
0.79
VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF LATERAL FORCES

Level
No.
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Level Floor to floor

Name Height
ft
Roof
9.00
15th
9.00
14th
9.00
13th
9.00
12th
9.00
11th
9.00
10th
9.00
9th
9.00
8th
9.00
7th
9.00
6th
9.00
5th
9.00
4th
9.00
3rd
9.00
2nd
9.00
Ground
Heigth
hx
ft
135.0
Weight
wx
k
780
wxhxk
Cvx
215,558
0.133
126.0
780
199,170
0.123
117.0
780
182,953
0.113
108.0
780
166,917
0.103
99.0
780
151,075
0.094
90.0
780
135,442
0.084
81.0
780
120,037
0.074
72.0
780
104,880
0.065
63.0
780
89,997
0.056
54.0
780
75,423
0.047
45.0
780
61,201
0.038
36.0
780
47,391
0.029
27.0
780
34,081
0.021
18.0
780
21,414
0.013
9.0
780
9,676
0.006
0.0
Lateral force @ each level

Fx
Vx
O. M.
k
k
k-ft
90.6
90.6
83.7
816
174.4
76.9
2,385
251.3
70.2
4,647
321.5
63.5
7,540
385.0
56.9
11,005
442.0
50.5
14,983
492.4
44.1
19,415
536.5
37.8
24,244
574.4
31.7
29,413
606.1
25.7
34,868
631.8
19.9
40,554
651.7
14.3
46,420
666.1
9.0
52,414
675.1
4.1
58,490
679.1
64,602
Diaphragm force
Fi
W i
Fpx
k
k
k
90.6
780
91
174.4
1,560
87
251.3
2,340
84
321.5
3,120
84
385.0
3,900
84
442.0
4,680
84
492.4
5,460
84
536.5
6,240
84
574.4
7,020
84
606.1
7,800
84
631.8
8,580
84
651.7
9,360
84
666.1
10,140
84
675.1
10,920
84
679.1
11,700
84
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Seismic Analysis Based on IBC 2003

Base Shear (Derived from ASCE 7-02 Sec. 9.5.5, Pg.146)
V = MAX{ MIN[SD1IE / (RT) , SDS IE / R ] , 0.044SDS IE , 0.5S1 IE / R } W
= MAX{ MIN[ 0.33W , 0.17W ] , 0.05W , 0.05W }

=
0.17
W, (SD)
=
0.12
W, (ASD)
Where
(E or F only)
SDS =
0.826
(IBC 1615.1.3)
SD1 =
0.469
(IBC 1615.1.3)
R=
IE =
1.25
(IBC Tab 1604.5, Pg. 272 )
S1 =
0.457
(IBC 1615.1)
hn =
36
Ct =
0.02
(0.028 for steel MRF, 0.016 for concrete MRF, & 0.03 steel EBF)
0.75
(0.8 for steel MRF, 0.9 for concrete MRF & steel EBF)
x=
(IBC Tab 1617.6.2, Pg. 334 )
T = Ct (hn) =
ft
0.294
sec, (ASCE 7-02 Sec. 9.5.5.3.2, Pg. 147)
Vertical Distribution of Force (ASCE 7-02, Sec. 9.5.5.4, Pg.148)

Level
Wx
hx
Wxhx
Fx (16-41 & 1642)
36 W 3
V(36kW 3) / W xhxk
Roof
W3
36
3RD
W2
24k
24kW 2
V(24kW 2) / W xhxk
2ND
W1
12k
12kW 1
V(12kW 1) / W xhxk
W
Where
W xhx
k = 1
for T <= 0.5
k = 0.5 T + 0.75
for T @ (0.5 , 2.5)
k = 2
for T >= 2.5
Diaphragm Force for D, E, & F (IBC 1620.4.3, Pg. 341), (Note: see 1620.2.5, Pg. 339,for B & C)
Level
Wx
Wx
Fx
Fx
Roof
W3
W3
F3
F3
3RD
W2
W 2+W 3
F2
F2+F3
2ND
W1
W 1+W 2+W 3
F1
F1+F2+F3
W
Where
Fmin = 0.2 SDS IE W x

Fmax = 0.4 SDS IE W x
Story Drift Determination (ASCE 7-02 Sec. 9.5.5.7.1, Pg.149)

x = Cd xe / IE
Where
Cd = ASCE 7-02 Tab. 9.5.2.2, Pg.135
Fpx (16-63)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Redundancy Factor, , Based on IBC 2003

= max ( i ) = 2
20
r max,i Ai
(IBC 1617.2.2.2)
= apply for SDC D,E, & F of this direction of entire building
where
rmax,i = MAX ( hi / Vi )
hi = the horizontal shear of full height level of the building.
Ai = floor area of the diaphragm level immediately above the story.

= [1.0 , 1.5]
= max(3rd, 2nd, 1st)
3rd =2-20 / {[max( Pe, Pf, P5, P6) cos / V3rd ] (A2nd)0.5 }
2nd =2-20 / {[max( Pa, Pb, P1, P2) cos / V2nd ] (A1st)0.5 }
1st =2-20 / {[max( Pc, Pd, P3, P4) cos / V1st ] (Aground)0.5 }
= [1.0 , 1.25]
= [1.0 , 1.1]
,for SDC D
,for SDC E & F

r2nd = max[ (Va+0.7Vb) , 0.7(Vb+Vc) , (Vc+0.7Vd) , (V1+0.7V2) , (0.7V2+V3)] / V2nd
r1st = max[ (Ve+0.7Vf) , 0.7(Vf+Vg) , (Vg+0.7Vh) , (V4+0.7V5) , (0.7V5+V6)] / V1st

= [1.0 , 1.5]
r2nd = max[ 10Va / (V2nd La ) , 10V1 / (V2nd L1 )]
r1st = max[ 10Vb / (V1st Lb ) , 10Vc / (V1st Lc ) , 10V2 / (V1st L2 )]
DUAL SYSTEM
= 0.8 calcs
> 1.0
< 1.5

r2nd = max[ 10Va / (V2nd La ) , Px cos / V2nd , (V1+V2) / V2nd , (V5+V6) / V2nd]
r1st = max[ 10Vb / (V1st Lc ) , Py cos / V1st , (V3+V4) / V1st , (V7+V8) / V1st]
VERTICAL COMBINATION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

2nd , 1st = [1.0 , 1.5]
2nd = U
1st = max( L , RLU / RU)
Note:
1. One direction is bearing wall or other system, the R, 0 , and C d used for the orthogonal should use their direction values.
(IBC 1617.6.2.3)
2. When a combination of structural systems is used in the same direction , the R, 0 , and C d used be not greater than
the least value. (IBC 1617.6.2.2)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Seismic Analysis Based on UBC 1997
INPUT DATA
Seismic zone (1, 2A, 2B, 3, or 4)
Coefficient, R
Occupancy Category(1, 2, 3, or 4)
Soil type (SA, SB, SC, SD, or SE )
No. of Stories
Typical story height
Typical story weight
Coefficient, Ct
Seismic source type ( A, B, or C )
Closest distance to seismic source
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION
Story
Roof
10th
9th
8th
7th
6th
5th
4th
3rd
2nd
Grnd
H (ft)
W (k)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
4
4.5
4
SD
10
10
1500
0.02
A
8.6
ft
kips
km
ANALYSIS
Fi (k)
733
660
587
513
440
367
293
220
147
73
V (k)
733
1,393
1,980
2,493
2,933
3,300
3,593
3,813
3,960
4,033
Fpx (k)
726
697
660
623
587
550
513
477
440
403
Coefficient, Ca
Coefficient, Cv
Period (method A)
Period (method B)
Zone factor, Z
Importance factor, I
V = ( Cv I / R T ) W
V = ( 2.5 Ca I / R ) W
V = 0.11 Ca I W
V = ( 0.8 Z Nv I / R ) W
Whip effect force, Ft

Base shear, V
Whip force, Ft
V=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.484
0.870
0.63
0.400
1.00
4,587
4,033
799
1,451
0
4,033
0
k
k (max)
k (min)
k(minZ=4)
k
k
k
0.269 w, (SD)
0.192 w, (ASD)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Seismic Analysis Based on CBC 2001/UBC97

Base Shear (Derived from CBC 1630A.2.1)
V = MAX{ MIN[ 2.5Ca I W / R , Cv I W / (R T) ] , 0.11Ca I W , 0.8Z Nv I W / R}
= MAX{ MIN[ 0.25W , 0.75W ] , 0.06W , 0.08W }

=
0.25
W, (SD)
=
0.18
W, (ASD)
Where
(Z 4 only)
Ca =
0.484
(CBC Tab 16A-Q)
I =
1.15
(CBC Tab 16A-K)
R=
5.5
(CBC Tab 16A-N)
Cv =
0.768
(CBC Tab 16A-R)
Z=
0.4
(CBC Tab 16A-I)
hn =
36
ft
Ct =
0.02
(0.035 for steel MRF, 0.03 for concrete MRF)
1.2
(CBC Tab 16A-S)
Nv =
T = Ct (hn)
(3/4)
/ (I Nv) =
0.213
sec, (CBC 30A-8)
Vertical Distribution of Force (CBC 1630A.5)

Level
Wx
hx
Wxhx
Roof
W3
36
36W 3
Ft+(V-Ft)36W 3 / W xhx
3RD
W2
24
24W 2
(V-Ft)24W 2 / W xhx
2ND
W1
12
12W 1
(V-Ft)12W 1 / W xhx
W xhx
W
Where
Fx (30A-15)
Ft = MIN(0.07TV , 0.25V) , for T > 0.7 (CBC 1630A.5)
Diaphragm Force (CBC 1633A.2.9)

Level
Wx
Wx
Fx
Fx
Roof
W3
W3
F3
F3
MAX{Fmin , MIN[(Ft + Fx)W 3 / W x , Fmax]}
3RD
W2
W 2+W 3
F2
F2+F3
2ND
W1
W 1+W 2+W 3
F1
F1+F2+F3
W
Where
Fmin = 0.5Ca I W x
Fmax = 1.0Ca I W x
The Maximum Inelastic Response Displacement (CBC 1630A.9.2)

M = 0.7 R s
, (CBC 30A-17)
Fpx (33A-1)
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
PAGE :
CLIENT :
DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
REVIEW BY :
Seismic Analysis Based on CBC Division VI-R

The seismic requirements of CBC Division VI-R apply to RETROFIT OF SCHOOL BUILDING (DSA), and
RETROFIT / REHABILITATION OF HOSPITAL BUILDING (OSHPD 1 & 4). (CBC 1640A)
RETROFIT:
REHABILITATION:
OSHPD 1:
OSHPD 4:
All design and construction work undertaken to construct any new or to repair or strengthen
any existing structural or nonstructural elements required by the evaluation and design
of the building. (CBC 1641A)
The evaluation and retrfit of an existing nonconforming building or a school building
conforming to earlier code requirements to bring the building into conformance with the
safty standards of the currently effective regulations. (CBC 1641A)
General acute-care hospitals. (CBC 1601A.1)
Correctional Treatment Centers. (CBC 1601A.1)
Base Shear (Derived from CBC 1644A.4.1)

V = MAX{ MIN[ 2.5H Ca I W / R , H Cv I W / (R T) ] , 0.11H Ca I W , 0.8H Z Nv I W / R}
^
= MAX{ MIN[ 0.23W , 0.75W ] , 0.06W , 0.08W }
=
0.23
W, (SD)
(Z 4 only)
=
0.16
W, (ASD)
H=
Where
1.0
(OSHPD, CBC 1643A.8.1 & 1643A.8.2)
1.2
(DSA, CBC 1643A.8.3)
Ca =
0.44
(CBC Tab 16A-Q)
I=
R=
1.15
1.5
5.5
5.5
4.5
(school, CBC Tab 16A-K)

(hospital, CBC Tab 16A-K)
(1976 or later, CBC 1644A.3.1.2 & Tab 16A-N)
(Building Frame System, CBC 1644A.3.1.1)
(CBC 1644A.3.1)
Cv =
0.768
(CBC Tab 16A-R)
Z=
0.4
(CBC Tab 16A-I)
hn =
36
ft
Ct =
0.02
(0.035 for steel MRF, 0.03 for concrete MRF)
1.2
(CBC Tab 16A-S)
Nv =
T = Ct (hn)
(3/4)
/ (I Nv) =
0.213
sec, (CBC 30A-8)
Vertical Distribution of Force (CBC 1630A.5)

Level
Wx
hx
Wxhx
Roof
W3
36
36W 3
Ft+(V-Ft)36W 3 / W xhx
3RD
W2
24
24W 2
(V-Ft)24W 2 / W xhx
2ND
W1
12
12W 1
(V-Ft)12W 1 / W xhx
W xhx
W
Where
Fx (30A-15)
Ft = MIN(0.07TV , 0.25V) , for T > 0.7 (CBC 1630A.5)
(cont'd)
Diaphragm Force (CBC 1646A.2.9.2)

Level
Wx
Wx
Fx
Fx
Roof
W3
W3
F3
F3
3RD
W2
W 2+W 3
F2
F2+F3
W1
W 1+W 2+W 3
F1
F1+F2+F3
2ND
W
Where
Fpx (33A-1)
= 1.0
(CBC 1646A.2.9.2)
V = (R / 4) V (masonry or concrete wall, CBC 1646A.2.9.4)
Fmin = 0.5 H I W x
(no Ca, code print wrong? Anyway governs, CBC 1646A.2.9.2)
Fmax = 1.0 H Ca I W x
(CBC 1646A.2.9.2)
Lateral Force on Elements, Nonstructural Components, and Equipments (CBC 1644A.1.3)

Fp = H Ca Ip W p
(CBC 44A-14)
Alternatively,
Fp = ap H Ca Ip (1 + 3 hx / hr) W p / Rp
(CBC 44A-15)
> 0.7 H Ca Ip W p
< 4 H Ca Ip W p
(CBC 44A-16)
Use Fp = H Ca Ip W p
Where
= 4.0
(CBC 1645A)
SD Load Combinations (CBC 1644A.4.1.1)

Cn = 1.05D + 0.25 L + E
(CBC 44A-5)
Cn = E - 0.9D
(CBC 44A-6)
Where
1.0 (concrete, CBC 1645A.3 & Tab 16A-R-1)
ASD Load Combinations (CBC 1644A.4.1.1)

Cw = D + L + E/1.4
(CBC 44A-7)
Cw = E/1.4 - 0.9D
(CBC 44A-8)
Where
2.5 (masonry, CBC 1645A.4)

1.5 (steel, CBC 1645A.5)
2.0 (wood, CBC 1645A.6 & Tab 16A-R-2)
Zone 3 & 4 Load Combinations (CBC 1644A.9.2)

Cn = D + 0.8L + 0 E
(CBC 44A-9)
Cn = 0 E - 0.9D
(CBC 44A-10)
Where
0 < R
Daniel
T. Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Redundancy Factor, , Based on UBC 97

= 2
20
(UBC 1630.1.1)
r max AB
where
= apply for this direction of entire building

rmax = MAX ( hi / Vi )
hi = the horizontal shear at or below the 2/3 height level of the building.
AB = ground floor area of the structure.

= [1.0 , 1.5]
rmax = max[ max( Pa, Pb, P1, P2) cos / V2nd ,
max( Pc, Pd, P3, P4) cos / V1st ]

= [1.0 , 1.25]
rmax = max{ max[ (Va+0.7Vb) , 0.7(Vb+Vc) , (Vc+0.7Vd)] / V2nd ,
max[ (Ve+0.7Vf) , 0.7(Vf+Vg) , (Vg+0.7Vh)] / V1st ,
max[(V1+0.7V2) , (0.7V2+V3)] / V2nd , max[(V4+0.7V5) , (0.7V5+V6)] / V1st }

= [1.0 , 1.5]
rmax = max[ 10Va / (V2nd La ) , 10Vb / (V2nd Lb ) , 10V1 / (V2nd L1 ) ,
10Vc / (V1st Lc ) , 10Vd / (V1st Ld ) , 10V2 / (V1st L2 )]
(Note: For light-framed construction of CBC 2001 OSHPD 1 & 4, 10 / Lw < 1.0 )
DUAL SYSTEM
= 0.8 calcs
> 1.0
< 1.5
rmax = max[ 10Va / (V2nd La ) , Px cos / V2nd , (V1+V2) / V2nd , (V5+V6) / V2nd ,
10Vb / (V1st Lc ) , Py cos / V1st , (V3+V4) / V1st , (V7+V8) / V1st]
COMBINATION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

= 1.0 calcs
Note:
> 1.0
< 1.5
1. One direction is bearing wall , the R value used for the orthogonal can not be greater than that for the bearing wall system.
(UBC 1630.4.3)
2. When a combination of structural systems is used in the same direction , the R used be not greater than the least value.
(UBC 1630.4.4)
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Lateral Force for One-Story Wall Based on IBC 2000

INPUT DATA
WALL THICKNESS
t
PARAPET HEIGHT
hp
WALL HEIGHT
h
TOTAL WALL DENSITY
SEISMIC PARAMETER
SDS
SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY SDC
DIAPHRAGM FLEXIBLE ? (0=no, 1=yes)
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
Iw
BASIC WIND SPEED
V
EXPOSURE CATEGORY (B, C, D)
TOPOGRAPHIC FACTOR
KZt
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
8
4
14
150
0.54
C
1
1
90
C
1
in
ft
ft
pcf
(IBC Sec.1615.1.3)
Yes
(IBC Tab. 1604.5)
mph
90
Flat, (ASCE Eq.6-1)
DESIGN SUMMARY
Out-of-plane force for wall design
w1
=
23.9 psf (Wind governs)
=
Out-of-plane force for parapet design
w2
=
450 plf (Horizontal direction)
Out-of-plane force for anchorage design
Fanch
(The governing seismic forces have been reduced by 0.7 for ASD)
WIND ANALYSIS
Out-of-plane wind force for wall design (ASCE 7-98, Eq.6-18)
( G C P ) (G C Pi )
w1,wind = q h
= ( 0.00256 K h K Zt K d V 2 I w ) (G C P ) (G C Pi )
Where :
Kh
=
0.86
,
Kd
=
0.85
(mean roof h =
16 ft, changeable)
(ASCE Tab. 6-6)
(ASCE Tab. 6-5)
Out-of-plane wind force for parapet design (ASCE 7-98, Eq.6-18)
( GC P ) ( GC Pi )
w 2, wind = q h
Where :
=
0.88
Kh
(ASCE Tab. 6-5)
GCp
=
-1.40 ,
(corner ? Yes , TA =
10
(ASCE Fig. 6-5A)
GCpi
=
0.18
(ASCE Tab. 6-7)
ft )
= ( 0.00256 K h K Zt K d V 2 I w ) ( GC P ) ( GC Pi )
Kd
=
0.85
(ASCE Tab. 6-6)
GCp
=
-1.40 ,
=
1.00
(wall, ASCE 7-02 Fig. 6-11A)
23.9 psf
61.7 psf
GCp
=
-2.80
(roof, ASCE 7-02 Fig. 6-11B)
GCpi
=
0.18
(roof, ASCE Fig. 6-5)
Out-of-plane wind force for anchorage design
F anch ,wind =
h
hp
w1,wind + h p 1 +
w 2,wind
2
2h
450 plf (Horizontal)
SEISMIC ANALYSIS
Out-of-plane seismic force for wall design (IBC 2000, Sec.1620.1.7)
w1, seismic = MAX ( 0.4 I E S DSW p , 0.1W p )

Where :
Wp
100.0 psf ,
0.22 Wp =
21.6 psf
IE
=
1.0
(IBC Sec.1621.1.6)
Out-of-plane seismic force for parapet design (IBC 2000, Sec. 1621.1.4)
w 2, seismic = MAX 0.3S DS I pW p , MIN

Where :
ap
=
2.5
(IBC Tab.1621.2)
1.2a p S DS I pW p
Rp
Ip
=
1.0
(IBC Sec.1621.1.6)
, 1.6 S DS I pW p
0.65 Wp =
64.8
psf
Rp
=
2.5
(IBC Tab.1621.2)
Out-of-plane seismic force for anchorage design

For seismic design category A & B, both flexible & rigid diaphragm (IBC 2000, Sec.1604.8.2 & 1620.1.7)
F anch , seismic = MAX 0.4 S DS I EW p

Where :
=
200
Fmin
(IBC Sec.1604.8.2)
( h+h p )
, 0.1W p
2h
( h+h p )
0.54
2h
, 400 S DS I E , F min =
2.50 Wp =
(Not applicable)
plf
For seismic design category C and above, flexible diaphragm (IBC 2000, Sec.1604.8.2 ,1620.1.7, & 1620.2.1)
F anch , seismic = MAX 0.8S DS I EW p
( h+h p )
2h
, 0.1W p
( h+h p )
2h
, 400 S DS I E , F min =
5.00 Wp =
(Applicable)
For seismic design category C and above, rigid diaphragm (IBC 2000, Sec.1604.8.2 ,1620.1.7, & 1621.1.4)
F anch , seismic = MAX MAX 0.3S DS I p , MIN
Where :
= 3.00 Wp =
ap
=
1.0
(IBC Tab.1621.2)
1.2a p S DS I p
Rp
(Not applicable)
, 1.6 S DS I p
Wp
( h+h p )
2h
, 400 S DS I E , F min
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Lateral Force for One-Story Wall Based on IBC 2003

INPUT DATA
WALL THICKNESS
t
PARAPET HEIGHT
hp
WALL HEIGHT
h
TOTAL WALL DENSITY
SEISMIC PARAMETER
SDS
SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY SDC
DIAPHRAGM FLEXIBLE ? (0=no, 1=yes)
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
Iw
BASIC WIND SPEED
V
EXPOSURE CATEGORY (B, C, D)
TOPOGRAPHIC FACTOR
KZt
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
8
4
14
150
0.54
C
1
1
90
C
1
in
ft
ft
pcf
(IBC Sec.1615.1.3)
Yes
(IBC Tab. 1604.5)
mph
Flat, (ASCE Eq.6-3)
DESIGN SUMMARY
w1
=
=
w2
=
Fanch
(The governing seismic forces have been reduced by 0.7 for ASD)
WIND ANALYSIS
Out-of-plane wind force for wall design (ASCE 7-02, Eq.6-22)
( G C P ) (G C Pi )
w1,wind = q h
= ( 0.00256 K h K Zt K d V 2 I w ) (G C P ) (G C Pi )
=
0.86
,
Kd
=
0.85
Where :
Kh
(mean roof h =
16 ft, changeable)
(ASCE Tab. 6-4)
(ASCE Tab. 6-3)
Out-of-plane wind force for parapet design (ASCE 7-02, Eq.6-24)
( G C P ) ( G C Pi )
w 2, wind = q p
Where :
Kp
=
0.88
(ASCE Tab. 6-3)
GCp
=
-1.40 ,
(corner ? Yes , TA =
10
(ASCE Fig. 6-11A)
Kd
=
0.85
(ASCE Tab. 6-4)
GCp
=
-1.40 ,
=
1.00
(wall, ASCE Fig. 6-11A)
GCpi
=
0.18
(ASCE Fig. 6-5)
ft2 )
= ( 0.00256 K h K Zt K dV 2 I w ) ( G C P ) ( G C Pi )
23.9 psf
61.7 psf, (ASCE7-02,6.5.12.4.4)
GCp
=
-2.80
(roof, ASCE Fig. 6-11B)
GCpi
=
0.18
(roof, ASCE Fig. 6-5)
F anch ,wind =
h
hp
w1,wind + h p 1 +
w 2,wind
2
2h
SEISMIC ANALYSIS
Out-of-plane seismic force for wall design (IBC 2003, Sec.1620.2.7)
w1, seismic = MAX ( 0.4 I E S DSW p , 0.1W p )

Where :
Wp
100.0 psf ,
0.22 Wp =
21.6 psf
IE
=
1.0
(IBC Sec.1604.5)
Out-of-plane seismic force for parapet design (ASCE 7-02, Sec. 9.6.1.3)
w 2, seismic = MAX 0.3S DS I pW p , MIN

Where :
ap
=
2.5
,
(ASCE Tab.9.6.2.2)
1.2a p S DS I pW p
Rp
Ip
=
1.0
,
(ASCE Sec. 9.6.1.5)
, 1.6 S DS I pW p
0.65 Wp =
64.8
psf
Rp
=
2.5
(ASCE Tab.9.6.2.2)
Out-of-plane seismic force for anchorage design

For seismic design category A & B, both flexible & rigid diaphragm (IBC 2003, Sec.1604.8.2 & 1620.2.7)
F anch , seismic = MAX 0.4 S DS I EW p

Where :
=
280
Fmin
(IBC Sec.1604.8.2)
( h+ h p )
, 0.1W p
2h
( h+h p )
2h
, 400 S DS I E , F min =
2.80 Wp =
(Not applicable)
plf
For seismic design category C and above, flexible diaphragm (IBC 2003, Sec.1604.8.2 ,1620.2.7, & 1620.3.1)
F anch , seismic = MAX 0.8S DS I EW p
( h+ h p )
2h
, 0.1W p
( h+h p )
2h
, 400 S DS I E , F min =
5.00 Wp =
(Applicable)
For seismic design category C and above, rigid diaphragm (IBC 2003, Sec.1604.8.2 ,1620.2.7, & ASCE Sec. 9.6.1.3)
F anch , seismic = MAX MAX 0.3S DS I p , MIN
Where :
= 3.00 Wp =
=
1.0
ap
(ASCE Tab.9.6.2.2)
1.2a p S DS I p
Rp
(Not applicable)
, 1.6 S DS I p
Wp
( h+h p )
2h
, 400 S DS I E , F min
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Lateral Force for One-Story Wall Based on UBC 97

INPUT DATA
WALL THICKNESS
PARAPET HEIGHT
WALL HEIGHT
TOTAL WALL DENSITY
SEISMIC ZONE (1, 2A, 2B, 3, or 4)
SEISMIC COFFICIENT
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
BASIC WIND VELOCITY
EXPOSURE TYPE (B, C, D)
t
hp
h
=
=
=
=
Ca
Ip
V
12
0
44
58
4
0.44
1
70
B
=
=
in
ft
ft
pcf
Zone 4
(UBC Tab. 16-Q)
(UBC Tab. 16-K)
mph
DESIGN SUMMARY
w1
=
18.5 psf (Seismic governs)
=
60.8 psf (Seismic governs)
w2
=
Fanch
(The governing seismic forces have been divided by 1.4 for ASD)
WIND ANALYSIS
Out-of-plane wind force for wall design (UBC 97 Sec.1620)
16.1 psf
w1, wind = C e Cq q I w =
s
Where :
Ce
=
0.86
(UBC Tab.16-G)
Mean roof h = 44 ft
Cq
=
1.49
,
qs
=
12.60 psf ,
(UBC Tab.16-H)
(UBC Tab.16-F)
Corner ? Yes (1.5 Yes, 1.2 No)
2
2
TA =
16 ft (10 ft default)
Iw
=
1.00
(UBC Tab.16-K)
[Cq - 0.2 + (100-TA)/450 ] for TA @ [10,100]

Out-of-plane wind force for parapet design (UBC 97 Sec.1620)
16.3 psf
w2,wind = C eC qq s I w =
Where :
Ce
=
0.86
,
(UBC Tab.16-G)
F anch ,wind = C e C q q s I w
Where :
( h p+h)
=
0.86
Ce
(UBC Tab.16-G)
Cq
TA =
=
8
1.50
ft2
qs
=
12.60 psf ,
(UBC Tab.16-F)
Iw
=
1.00
(UBC Tab.16-K)
2h
,
SEISMIC ANALYSIS
Cq
=
1.49
(UBC Tab.16-H)
qs
=
12.60 ,
(UBC Tab.16-F)
Iw
=
1.00
(UBC Tab.16-K)
Out-of-plane seismic force for wall design (UBC 97 Sec.1632.2)
w1, seismic =
4a pC a I pW p
1
MAX 0.7C a I pW p , MIN
, 4C a I pW p
2
Rp
MAX 0.7C a I pW p , MIN
Where :
ap
=
1.0
,
Rp
=
3.0
(UBC Tab.16-O)
(UBC Tab.16-O)
Out-of-plane seismic force for parapet design (UBC 97 Sec.1632.2)
w 2, seismic = MAX 0.7C a I pW p , MIN
a pC a I pW p
, 4C a I pW p
Rp
,
Wp
=
2.5
,
Rp
=
3.0
,
Wp
ap
(UBC Tab.16-O)
(UBC Tab.16-O)
Out-of-plane seismic force for anchorage design (UBC 97 Sec.1632.2 & 1633.2.8.1)
Where :
Where :
=
1.5
ap
(UBC Tab.16-O)
58.0
4a pC a I pW p
, 4C a I pW p
Rp
F anch, seismic = MAX 0.7C a I pW p , MIN
4a p C a I pW p
Rp
=
3.0
(UBC Tab.16-O)
Rp
,
58.0
, 4C a I pW p
Wp
1276
0.45 Wp =
25.9 psf
psf
1.47 Wp =
85.1 psf
psf
, F min
plf (Horizontal) ,
0.88 Wp =
Fmin
=
420
(UBC 1633.2.8.1)
plf
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Guardrail Design Based on AISC-ASD & ACI 318-02

GUARDRAIL SECTION
=>
GUARDRAIL YIELD STRESS

BALUSTER SECTION
Fy =
35
ksi
= > PIPE-1 1/4
=>
PIPE-1 1/2
BALUSTER YIELD STRESS
Fy =
35
ksi
GUARDRAIL SPAN
BALUSTER HEIGHT
BALUSTER SLEEVE DEPTH
EDGE DISTANCE TO SLEEVE
L
H
D
c
=
=
=
=
48
36
3
1
in
in
in
in
=>
0.80
0.31
0.33
0.15
1.90
0.67
0.20
0.24
0.14
1.66
3
ksi
CONCRETE STRENGTH
f c' =
w =
HORIZ. LOAD PERP. TO GUARDRAIL
50
plf
(UBC Tab.16-B, IBC 1607.7.1)

ANALYSIS
CHECK GUARDRAIL CAPACITIES (AISC-ASD, 5-48 & 5-49)
M=
wL 2
=
8
Fb =
M
=
S
V =
100 ft-lbs
<
3.68 ksi
wL
=
2
100 lbs
(4/3) 0.66 F y =
30.80 ksi
[Satisfactory]
(where 4/3 from IBC 1607.7.1.3, Typical.)
Fv =
V
=
A
<
0.13 ksi
(4/3) 0.4 F y =
18.67 ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK BALUSTER CAPACITIES (AISC-ASD, 5-48 & 5-49)
M = wLH =
V = wL =
600 ft-lbs
200 lbs
Fb =
M
=
S
30.64 ksi
<
(4/3) 0.66 F y =
30.80 ksi
[Satisfactory]
Fv =
V
=
A
0.30 ksi
<
(4/3) 0.4 F y =
18.67 ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK CONCRETE BREAKOUT STRENGTH AT BALUSTER SLEEVE (ACI 318-02 Appendix D)

0.2
l
V cb = AV 6 7V b = AV 6 7 7
AVo
where :
AVo
'
f c c1.5
0.562 kips
>
=
0.75
A V /A Vo and 6 terms are 1.0 for single shear sleeve not influenced by more than one free edge.
l is load bearing length of the anchor for shear, not to exceed 8d.
V u = 1.4 V =
0.280
kips
CHECK CONCRETE PRYOUT STRENGTH AT BALUSTER SLEEVE (ACI 318-02 Appendix D)
(9D )
A No
=
where :
>
4.800 kips
0.7 +
Vu
0.3c
'
3 24 f c D1.5
1.5 D
[Satisfactory]

k cp
A n = 3 D (1.5D + c) =
2.0
for D > 2.5 in.

2
49.50 in
Vu
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Guardrail Design Based on AISC-ASD & ACI 318-02

GUARDRAIL SECTION
=>
GUARDRAIL YIELD STRESS

BALUSTER SECTION
Fy =
35
ksi
= > PIPE-1 1/4
=>
PIPE-1 1/2
BALUSTER YIELD STRESS
Fy =
35
ksi
GUARDRAIL SPAN
BALUSTER HEIGHT
BALUSTER SLEEVE DEPTH
EDGE DISTANCE TO SLEEVE
L
H
D
c
=
=
=
=
48
36
3
1
in
in
in
in
0.80
0.31
0.33
0.15
1.90
=>
0.67
0.20
0.24
0.14
1.66
3
ksi
CONCRETE STRENGTH
f c' =
P = 200 lbs
POINT LOAD PERP. TO GUARDRAIL
(UBC Tab.16-B, IBC 1607.7.1)
35

ANALYSIS
CHECK GUARDRAIL CAPACITIES (AISC-ASD, 5-48 & 5-49)
M =
PL
=
4
200 ft-lbs, (P @ middle)
Fb =
M
=
S
7.36 ksi
<
V =P=
(4/3) 0.66 F y =
200 lbs, (P @ end)
30.80 ksi
[Satisfactory]
(where 4/3 from IBC 1607.7.1.3, Typical.)
Fv =
V
=
A
<
0.25 ksi
(4/3) 0.4 F y =
18.67 ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK BALUSTER CAPACITIES (AISC-ASD, 5-48 & 5-49)
M = PH =
V =P=
600 ft-lbs
200 lbs
Fb =
M
=
S
30.64 ksi
<
(4/3) 0.66 F y =
30.80 ksi
[Satisfactory]
Fv =
V
=
A
0.30 ksi
<
(4/3) 0.4 F y =
18.67 ksi
[Satisfactory]
CHECK CONCRETE BREAKOUT STRENGTH AT BALUSTER SLEEVE (ACI 318-02 Appendix D)

0.2
l
V cb = AV 6 7V b = AV 6 7 7
AVo
where :
AVo
'
f c c1.5
0.562 kips
>
Vu
[Satisfactory]
=
0.75
A V /A Vo and 6 terms are 1.0 for single shear sleeve not influenced by more than one free edge.
l is load bearing length of the anchor for shear, not to exceed 8d.
V u = 1.4 V =
0.280
kips
CHECK CONCRETE PRYOUT STRENGTH AT BALUSTER SLEEVE (ACI 318-02 Appendix D)
(9D )
A No
=
where :
>
4.800 kips
0.7 +
Vu
0.3c
'
3 24 f c D1.5
1.5 D
[Satisfactory]

k cp
A n = 3 D (1.5D + c) =
2.0
for D > 2.5 in.

2
49.50 in
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Sign Design Based on AISC-ASD, ACI, and IBC 1805.7 / UBC1806.8
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

COLUMN SECTION (Tube or Pipe)
HSS8X8X1/2
COLUMN YIELD STRESS

DIMENSIONS
Fy =
L=
46
20
ksi
ft
Tube
HS =
ft
HC =
10
ft
SIGN GRAVITY LOAD ( lbs / ft2 )
D=
10
psf
SIGN LATERAL LOAD ( lbs / ft2 )

COLUMN LATERAL LOAD ( plf )
W=
F=
b=
25
8
2
psf, ASD
plf, ASD
ft
ksf
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
Qa =
LATERAL SOIL CAPACITY

RESTRAINED @ GRADE ?(1=yes,0=no)
PP =
rmin
13.50
3.04
0.47
8.00
31.20
0.266 ksf / ft
0
No
Use 2 ft dia x 8.64 ft deep pole footing, unrestrained @ ground level.

ANALYSIS
CHECK COMPRESSION AND BENDING CAPACITY OF COLUMN
fa
Fa
fb
Fb
fa
, for
Fa
fa
Cm f b
f
1 a' F b
Fe
fa
fb
+
0.6 F y F b
Fa
L arg er of
Where
0.15
29000
71
Fa
Fa =
( kl / r )
112
Fy
2C c2
5 3 ( kl / r ) ( kl / r )
+
3
8C c
8C 3c
23( kl / r )
for
for
56.40
ft-kips, at base of column
V max =
4.08
kips, at base of column
f b = M max / S =
19.6
>
fa
[Satisfactory]
12 2E
>
3/4 f b
[Satisfactory]
23( kl / r )
21.692 ksi
27.6
ksi, (AISC-ASD, F3, page 5-48)
29.64
DESIGN POLE FOOTING (IBC Sec.1805.7 / UBC Sec.1806.8)

By trials, use pole depth, d =
8.639 ft
Lateral bearing @ bottom, S 3 = 2 P P d =
Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S 1 = 0.33 S 3 =
Require Depth is given by
4.36 h
A
1+ 1+
2
A
4.25 Ph
bS 3
kl
> Cc
r
M max =
F e' =
kl
Cc
r
0.6
F b = 0.6 F y =
Where
ksi
12 2E
Cm =
0.1
ksi
C c = (2 2 E s / F y ) 0.5 =
<
4/3 [Satisfactory]
0.79
(AISC-ASD, H1, page 5-54)
> 0.15
f a = (D H S L + col wt ) / A =
Es =
K /r=
d =
fa
, for
ksi
4.60
ksf
1.53
ksf
for nonconstrained
=
for constrained
P = V max =
4.08
8.639
ft
[Satisfactory]
kips
A = 2.34 P / (b S 1 ) =
3.15
h = M max / V max =
13.82
ft
CHECK VERTICAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI, Sec. 15.2.2)

q soil = (D H S L + col wt ) / ( b 2 / 4) =
0.55
ksf, (net weight of pole footing included.)
<
Qa
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
DATE :
Sign Design Based on AISC-ASD, ACI, and IBC 1805.7 / UBC1806.8
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
Tian Li

COLUMN SECTION
rx
ry
Sx
bf
rT
d / Af
11.70
3.53
2.05
8.25
35.50
8.07
2.21
1.83
W8X40
COLUMN YIELD STRESS

DIMENSIONS
Fy =
L=
50
20
ksi
ft
HS =
ft
HC =
10
ft
D=
10
psf
W=
F=
b=
25
8
3
psf, ASD
plf, ASD
ft
ksf
SIGN GRAVITY LOAD ( lbs / ft )

SIGN LATERAL LOAD ( lbs / ft )
COLUMN LATERAL LOAD ( plf )
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE
Qa =
LATERAL SOIL CAPACITY

RESTRAINED @ GRADE ?(1=yes,0=no)
PP =
0.266 ksf / ft
0
No
Use 3 ft dia x 5.75 ft deep pole footing, unrestrained @ ground level.

ANALYSIS
CHECK COMPRESSION AND BENDING CAPACITY OF ONE COLUMN
fa
Fa
fb
Fb
, for
fa
Where
0.15
Cm f b
f
1 a' F b
Fe
fa
fb
+
0.6 F y F b
Fa
L arg er of
fa
Fa
+
fa
, for
> 0.15
Fa
f a = (0.5 D H S L + col wt ) / A =
Es =
29000
K / ry =
ksi
ksi
105
C c = (2 2 E s / F y ) 0.5 =
1
Fa =
0.1
<
4/3 [Satisfactory]
0.33
(AISC-ASD, H1, page 5-54)
( kl / r )
107
Fy
2C c2
5 3 ( kl / r ) ( kl / r )
+
3
8C c
8C 3c
12 2E
23( kl / r )
Cm =
for
for
28.40
ft-kips, at base of column
2.08
kips, at base of column
f b = M max / S x =
9.6
ksi
1.0
76b f
Fy
L u = MAX r T
L3 = r T
>
0.6
V max =
L c = MIN
13.4
kl
> Cc
r
M max =
Cb =
kl
Cc
r
20000
(d / A f ) F y
7.23
ft
102000C b
12000C b
=
,
0.6 ( d / A f ) F y
Fy
510000C b
=
Fy
18.60
18.26
ft
ft
2 F y( L / r T )
F y , 0.6 F y =
3 1530000C b
2
F b1 = MIN
17.7
ksi

fa
[Satisfactory]
(cont'd)
170000C b
F b 2 = MIN
F b3 = MIN
( L / rT )
12000C b
L( d / A f )
Fy
=
3
, 0.6 F y =
16.7
16.7
ksi
0.66 F y , for L b L c
0.6 F y , for L c < L b < L u
Fb =
ksi
<
MAX ( F b1 , F b3 ) , for
10 L u L b L 3
30.0
>
MAX ( F b 2 , F b3 ) , for L b L 3
F 'e =
12 2E
23( kl / r x )
39.9
DESIGN POLE FOOTING (IBC Sec.1805.7 / UBC Sec.1806.8)

By trials, use pole depth, d =
5.75 ft
Lateral bearing @ bottom, S 3 = 2 P P d =
Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S 1 = 0.33 S 3 =
Require Depth is given by
d =
Where
A
4.36 h
1+ 1+
2
A
4.25 Ph
bS 3
ksi, (AISC-ASD, F1.3, page 5-46)

3/4 f b
[Satisfactory]
ft
[Satisfactory]
ksi
3.06
ksf
1.02
ksf
for nonconstrained
=
5.75
for constrained
P = V max =
2.08
kips
A = 2.34 P / (b S 1 ) =
1.60
h = M max / V max =
13.65
ft
CHECK VERTICAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI, Sec. 15.2.2)

2
q soil = (0.5 D H S L + col wt ) / ( b / 4) =
0.13
ksf, (net weight of pole footing included.)
<
Qa
[Satisfactory]
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Snow Load Analysis Based on UBC 97

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY (UBC Sec. 1614)
TOTAL SNOW LOAD
S =
75
psf
PITCH DEGREE
30
wsnow = S - Rs( - 20) =

Where
Rs =
61.3
psf
psf, (for > 20o)

S/40 - 1/2 = 1.375
o
(for < 20 )
N/A
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY (UBC / CBC Appendix Chapter 16)
BASIC GROUND SNOW LOAD
Pg =
35
psf
SNOW EXPOSURE FACTOR
Ce =
0.9
(Tab. A-16-A)
Pf, roof =
31.50
(Tab. A-16-B)
Pf, overhang =
63.00
psf
Unobstructed
Pf, valley =
59.72
psf
Unheated
Pf, parapet =
51.38
psf
4.29
ft
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
I =
OBSTRUCTED SLIPPERY SURFACE ON ROOF ? (1=Yes, 0=No)

HEATED GREENHOUSES ? (1=Yes, 0=No)
ROOF SLOPE
PARAPET HEIGHT (DRIFT CORNER HEIGHT)
LENGTH FROM PARAPET TO ROOF EDGE
==>
18
hr =
W =
4
35
ft, see fig. below

ft, see fig. below
Wd =
THE ROOF SNOW LOADS (CBC 40-1-1)

Pf = Ce I Pg =
31.50
psf
THE APPLICABLE ROOF SNOW LOADS (CBC Sec. 1640)

Pf, roof = Cs Pf =
Where
31.50
psf
CsPf is derived from CBC Sec.1640 as following table

[0, 20]
Pg
Unheated
Heated
(20, 70]
(70, 100]
Max(Cs,1Pf, Pg)
Max(Cs,1Pf, 20)
Max(Cs,1Pf, 70CeI)
Max(Cs,5Pf, 70CeI)
Obstructed
Max(Cs,2Pf, Pg)
Max(Cs,2Pf, 20)
Max(Cs,2Pf, 70CeI)
Max(Cs,5Pf, 70CeI)
Unobstructed
Max(Cs,3Pf, Pg)
Max(Cs,3Pf, 20)
Max(Cs,3Pf, 70CeI)
Max(Cs,5Pf, 70CeI)
Obstructed
Max(Cs,4Pf, Pg)
Max(Cs,4Pf, 20)
Max(Cs,4Pf, 70CeI)
Max(Cs,5Pf, 70CeI)
Cs,1 = MIN [ 1-( - 30) / 40, 1.0]
, CBC (40-2-1)
Cs,2 = MIN [ 1-( - 45) / 25, 1.0]
, CBC (40-2-2)
Cs,3 = MIN [ 1-( - 15) / 55, 1.0]
, CBC (40-2-3)
Cs,4 = MIN [ 1-( - 30) / 40, 1.0]
, CBC (40-2-4)
Cs,5 = MIN [ 1-( - 20)(Pf - 20) / (40Pf), 1.0]
, CBC (40-2-5)
THE SNOW LOADS AT OVERHANG, VALLEY, AND PARAPET CORNER

Pf, overhang = 2 Pf, roof =
63.00
Pf, valley = Cv Pf, roof =
59.72
Where
=
Cv =
90
1.90
psf, (CBC Fig. A-16-10)

psf, (CBC Fig. A-16-12)
o
, roof intersection angle
(CBC Fig. A-16-11)
Pf, parapet = Cd Pf, roof = Pm = MIN[D(hd + hb), Dhr]

=
51.38
psf, (CBC Eq. 44-4)
Where
D = MIN(0.13Pg+ 14, 35) =
18.55
pcf, (44-2)
hb = Pf, roof / D =
1.70
ft, (44-3)
(hr - hb) / hb =
1.36
>
0.2, (44-3)
(Drift load need be considered)
Wb = MIN[ W , 50] =
35.00
hd = 0.5 [0.43(Wb)1/3(Pg+ 10)1/4 - 1.5]

=
1.07
Note :
(100, greater]
Unobstructed
Cd = Pm/ Pf, roof =
1.63
Wd = MIN[4(hr - hb), 4hd] =
4.29
ft, (Sec.1644.5)
ft,(1644.5 & 44-1)
ft, (Sec.1644.2)
Where design snow loads exceed 30 psf, the seismic dead load shall include 25% design snow load. (UBC 1630.1.1)
psf
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Snow Load Analysis Based on ASCE 7-98

Pg =
75
(ASCE page 69)
Ce =
(Tab. 7-2, pg 82)
Pf, roof =
45.82
THERMAL FACTOR
Ct =
1.2
(Tab. 7-3, pg 83)
Pf, overhang =
91.64
psf
I =
(Tab. 7-4, pg 83)
Pf, valley =
126.00
psf
roof =
30
Pf, parapet =
95.00
psf
hr =
ft, see fig. below
8.34
ft
LENGTH OF THE ROOF UPWIND OF THE DRIFT

OBSTRUCTED SLIPPERY SURFACE ON ROOF(Sec. 7.4.0, pg70) ? (1=Yes, 0=No)
Lu =
35
0
ft, see fig. below

Unobstructed
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
ROOF SLOPE
ANALYSIS
THE FLAT SNOW LOADS (Sec 7.3, pg 69)
Pf = 0.7CeCt I Pg =
Where
Pf, min =
63.00
psf
0.00
psf, (Sec. 7.3.4, pg 69)
THE ROOF SNOW LOADS (Sec. 7.4, pg 70)

Ps = Cs Pf =
Where
Cs =
45.82
psf, (Eq.7-2)
0.727
, Derived from Fig 7-2, page 76, as following table

Ct
[0, 1.0]
(1.0, 1.2)
[1.2, greater]
Unobstructed
Cs,1
Cs,1+5(Ct-1)(Cs,3-Cs,1)
Cs,3
Obstructed
Cs,2
Cs,2+5(Ct-1)(Cs,4-Cs,2)
Cs,4
Cs,1 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 65, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2a dash line
Cs,2 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 40, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2a solid line
Cs,3 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 55, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2b dash line
Cs,4 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 26, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2b solid line

Pf, overhang = 2 Ps =
91.64
psf, (Sec.7.4.5, pg 70)
Pf, valley = Cv Pf =
126.00
psf, (Sec.7.6.3, pg 71)
Where
Cv = 2 / Ce =
2.00
Pf, parapet = Cd Ps = MIN[(hd + hb), hr]

=
95.00
Where
= MIN(0.13Pg+ 14, 30) =
, (Fig. 7-6, pg 80)
psf, (Sec.7.7.1, pg 72)

23.75
pcf, (7-4)
hb = Ps / =
1.93
ft, (Sec. 7.1)
hc = hr - hb =
2.07
ft, (Fig. 7.8)
hc / hb =
1.07
>
0.2, (Sec.7.7.1)
1/3
1/4
hd = 0.75 [0.43(Lu) (Pg+ 10) - 1.5]

=
2.08
ft, (Sec.7.8 & Fig.7-9)
Cd =
Wd =
2.07
4hd =
N/A
ft, for hd<hc
4hd / hc =
8.34
(Sec.7.7.1, pg 72)
ft, for hd>hc
Wd,max = 8 hc =
Note :
, (see fig. right)
16.57
ft
Where flat roof snow loads exceed 30 psf, the seismic dead load shall include 20% design snow load. (IBC 2000 1617.4.1)
Wd =
psf
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Snow Load Analysis Based on ASCE 7-02

Pg =
(ASCE page 77)
Ce =
(Tab. 7-2, pg 90)
Pf, roof =
5.00
THERMAL FACTOR (0.85 , 1.0 , 1.1 , 1.2)
Ct =
1.2
(Tab. 7-3, pg 91)
Pf, overhang =
10.00
psf
I =
(Tab. 7-4, pg 91)
Pf, valley =
10.00
psf
roof =
14
Pf, parapet =
18.93
psf
hr =
ft, see fig. below
3.80
ft
LENGTH OF THE ROOF UPWIND OF THE DRIFT

OBSTRUCTED SLIPPERY SURFACE ON ROOF(Sec. 7.4.0, pg78) ? (1=Yes, 0=No)
Lu =
35
0
ft, see fig. below

Unobstructed
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
ROOF SLOPE
ANALYSIS
THE FLAT SNOW LOADS (Sec 7.3, pg 77)
Pf = 0.7CeCt I Pg =
Where
Pf, min =
5.00
psf
5.00
psf, (Sec. 7.3.4, pg 77)
THE ROOF SNOW LOADS (Sec. 7.4, pg 78)

Ps = Cs Pf =
Where
Cs =
5.00
psf, (Eq.7-2)
1.000
, Derived from Fig 7-2, page 84, as following table

Ct
1.1
1.2
Unobstructed
0.85 or 1.0
Cs,1
Cs,3
Cs,5
Obstructed
Cs,2
Cs,4
Cs,6
Cs,1 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 65, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2a dash line
Cs,2 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 40, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2a solid line
Cs,3 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 60, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2b dash line
Cs,4 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 32.5, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2b solid line
Cs,5 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 55, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2c dash line
Cs,6 = MIN [ (70 - ) / 26, 1.0]
, Fig. 7-2c solid line

Pf, overhang = 2 Ps =
10.00
psf, (Sec.7.4.5, pg 78)
Pf, valley = Cv Pf =
10.00
psf, (Sec.7.6.3, pg 79)
Where
Cv = 2 / Ce =
2.00
Pf, parapet = Cd Ps = MIN[(hd + hb), hr]

=
18.93
Where
, (Fig. 7-6, pg 88)
psf, (Sec.7.7.1, pg 79)
= MIN(0.13Pg+ 14, 30) =
14.65
pcf, (7-4)
hb = Ps / =
0.34
ft, (Sec. 7.1)
hc = hr - hb =
3.66
ft, (Fig. 7.8)
hc / hb =
10.72
>
0.2, (Sec.7.7.1)
hd = 0.75 [0.43(Lu)1/3(Pg+ 10)1/4 - 1.5]

=
0.95
ft, (Sec.7.8 & Fig.7-9)
Cd =
Wd =
3.79
4hd / hc =
(Sec.7.7.1, pg 79)
Wd,max = 8 hc =
Note :
, (see fig. right)
4hd =
3.80
ft, for hd<hc
N/A
ft, for hd>hc
29.27
ft
Where flat roof snow loads exceed 30 psf, the seismic dead load shall include 20% design snow load. (IBC 2003 1617.5.1)
Wd =
psf
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Live Load Reduction Based on IBC 2003

MEMBER TYPE (0=Beam, 1=Column)
ROOF TRIBUTARY AREA SUPPORTED BY THE MEMBER

ROOF SLOPE
NUMBER OF FLOORS
500
Ar =
4 / 12
1
n =
TOTAL FLOOR TRIBUTARY AREA SUPPORTED BY THE MEMBER

FLOOR LIVE LOAD (IBC Table 1607.1)
GROUP A OCCUPANCIES ? (0=No, 1=Yes)
Af =
L =
700
100
0
ft
psf
No
UNIFORM
14.00
psf
53.35
psf
THE MINIMUM ROOF LIVE LOAD

THE MINIMUM FLOOR LIVE LOAD
TOTAL LOAD SUPPORTED BY THE COLUMN
Column
2
ft , (if no roof, input 0.)
7.00
37.34
44.34
kips
kips
kips
Note: Live loads are horizontal projected loads.

ANALYSIS
MINIMUM ROOF LIVE LOAD (IBC 1607.11.2)
L r = 20 R1 R2 =
Where
14.00
R1 =
psf
0.70
TRIBUTARY AREA
[ 0 ~ 200]
( 200 ~ 600)
[ 600 ~ over)
1.2 -0.001 A f
0.6
[ 0 ~ 4] / 12
( 4 ~ 12) / 12
1.2 -0.05 F
R1
R2 =
1.00
ROOF SLOPE, F / 12
R2
Lr =
[ 12 ~ over) / 12
0.6
[ 12 , 20 ]
MINIMUM FLOOR LIVE LOAD BY INFLUENCE AREA METHOD(IBC 1607.9.1)

L = L0 [ 0.25 + 15 / (A I)
Where
L0 =
0.5
]=
53.35
100
KLL =
AI=
KLL A f =
psf
<==
note: 1. Min reduced ,L, 50% for one level only, 40% for others.
<==
note: 1. For floor live loads exceeding 100 psf, no reduction

shall be made, except that design live loads on columns
may be reduced 20 percent.
2. Max reduction ,R, 40% for one level only, 60% for others.
3. No reduction permitted in Group A occupancies.
psf
,(IBC Table 1607.9.1)
2800
ft
MINIMUM FLOOR LIVE LOAD BY TRIBUTARY AREA METHOD(IBC 1607.9.2)

L = (100 psf ) x (100 - R) / 100 =
60.00
psf
Where
r =
0.08
R =
r ( A f - 150 ) =
40.0
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Live Load Reduction Based on CBC 2001

MEMBER TYPE (0=Beam, 1=Column)
ROOF TRIBUTARY AREA SUPPORTED BY THE MEMBER

ROOF SLOPE
NUMBER OF FLOORS
500
Ar =
4 / 12
1
n =
TOTAL FLOOR TRIBUTARY AREA SUPPORTED BY THE MEMBER

FLOOR LIVE LOAD (CBC Table 16-A, or Table 16A-A)
DSA or OSHPD PROJECT ? (0=No, 1=Yes)
Af =
L =
700
100
0
ft
psf
No
UNIFORM
12.64
psf
53.35
psf
THE MINIMUM ROOF LIVE LOAD

THE MINIMUM FLOOR LIVE LOAD
TOTAL LOAD SUPPORTED BY THE COLUMN
Column
2
ft , (if no roof, input 0.)
6.32
37.34
43.66
kips
kips
kips
Note: Live loads are horizontal projected loads.
ANALYSIS
MINIMUM ROOF LIVE LOAD (CBC Table 16-C)
METHOD
ROOF SLOPE
[0~4) / 12
[4~12) / 12
[12~over) / 12
[ 0 ~ 200]
20
16
12
METHOD 1
TRIBUTARY AREA
( 200 ~ 600]
16
14
12
MIINIMUM L r
14
METHOD 2
UNIFORM
( 600 ~ over)
12
12
12
psf
L r (psf)
20
16
12
16
REDUCTION
MAXIMUM
r
0.08
0.06
0
0.06
R (%)
40
25
0
25
12.64
psf
MINIMUM FLOOR LIVE LOAD BY TRIBUTARY AREA METHOD(CBC 1607.5)

L = (100 psf ) x (100 - R) / 100 =
60.00
psf
Where
r =
0.08
R =
r ( A f - 150 ) =
40.0
<==
note: 1. For storage loads exceeding 100 psf, no reduction

shall be made, except that design live loads on columns
may be reduced 20 percent.
2. Max reduction ,R, 40% for one level only, 60% for others.
<==
note: 1. This method Not adopted by DSA or OSHPD.
MINIMUM FLOOR LIVE LOAD BY INFLUENCE AREA METHOD(CBC 1607.6)

L = L0 [ 0.25 + 15 / (A I)0.5 ] =
Where
53.35
L0 =
100
psf
AI=
2800
ft
psf
2. Min reduced ,L, 50% for one level only, 40% for others.
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Flexible Diaphragm with an Opening

INPUT DATA
Fp =
LATERAL DIAPHRAGM FORCE :

DIMENSIONS:
380
plf
X1 =
72
ft , X2 =
24
ft , X3 =
16
ft
Y1 =
20
ft , Y2 =
20
ft , Y3 =
20
ft
DESIGN SUMMARY
THE MAXIMUM STRAP FORCE, T = C =
4.66
THE MAXIMUM SHEAR STRESS,
vx=
kips
466
plf
vy=
480
plf
ANALYSIS
16
(cont'd)
21.280
kips
a = X1 + 0.5 X2 =
84.00
ft
b = 0.5 Y2 + Y3 =
30.00
ft
Y = Y1 + Y2 + Y3 =
60.00
ft
w = Fp b / Y =
190.0
plf
M = a VL - 0.5 Fpx a2 =
446.9
ft-k, total moment at middle opening
F2 = M / Y =
7448
lbf
VL =
REACTIONS :
HATCHED AREA :
F5 = ( F2 b - 0.5 w a2 ) / a =
-5320
VR =
,
kips
F9 = F2 =
21.280
kips
V = b VL / Y =
7448
F15 = w a - V + F5 =
10.640
lbf
0
kips
X (ft)
Y (ft)
vx (plf)
vy (plf)
NO.
FORCE (lbf)
NO.
FORCE (lbf)
72.00
20.00
138
480
F1
9956
F15
12.00
20.00
209
266
F2
7448
F16
12.00
20.00
323
380
F3
3572
F17
-2512
16.00
20.00
223
299
F4
3040
F18
-1034
72.00
10.00
103
103
F5
-5320
F19
-4655
16.00
10.00
466
466
F6
7600
F20
1108
72.00
10.00
103
103
F7
2508
F21
-2508
INDIVIDUAL PANEL
16.00
10.00
466
466
F8
-3876
F22
3876
72.00
20.00
138
480
F9
7448
F23
3040
10
12.00
20.00
209
266
F10
7448
F24
5320
11
12.00
20.00
323
380
F11
2512
F25
7600
12
16.00
20.00
223
299
F12
1034
F26
9956
F13
4655
F27
3572
F14
-1108
1. Kelly E. Cobeen: "Structuiral Engineering Review Workshop", BYA publications, 2005.
kips
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Formulas of Moment Resisting Frame at Bottom Fixed Condition

BEAM SECTION
W16X26
Ib =
301
in4
COLUMN SECTION
Ic =
171
in4
MB = MC =
95.7
ft-kips
Mmax =
106.8
ft-kips
W10X33

STORY HEIGHT
GRAVITY LOAD
HA = HD =
L=
h=
w=
1.8
10.3
kips
VA = VD =
MA = MD =
27.0
47.8
ft
ft
30
14
klf
kips
ft-kips
LATERAL LOAD
HA = HD =
VA = VD =
MA = MD =
P=
15
7.5
kips
2.9
kips
61.4
ft-kips
kips
0.821
V A =V D =
MB = MC = 43.6 ft-kips
H = 0.90 in
KH = 16.7 kips / in
(KH is frame stiffness.)
GRAVITY ANALYSIS
h
=
n = Ib
Ic L
HA= HD =
M max =
wL
=
4h ( 2 + n )
2
w L 2 ( 2 + 3n )
=
24 ( 2 + n )
wL
=
2
27.0
kips
10.3
kips
MA=MD=
wL 2
=
12 ( 2 + n )
47.8
ft-kips
106.8
kips
MB =MC =
wL 2
=
6 (2 + n)
95.7
ft-kips
LATERAL ANALYSIS
a=h
3n
=
6n + 1
V A =V D =
E =
5.82
3nPh
=
L (1 + 6n )
b=h
ft
2.9
3n + 1
=
6n + 1
kips
29000 ksi
3
a
L
+
P b + a2
Ic
Ic
2I b
=
6E
0.90
in
8.18
HA= HD =
ft
MA=MD=
Ph (1 + 3n )
=
2 (1 + 6n )
61.4
ft-kips
MB = MC =
3nPh
=
2 (1 + 6n )
43.6
ft-kips
16.7
kips / in
KH =
P
H
P
=
2
7.5
kips
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Formulas of Moment Resisting Frame at Bottom Pinned Condition

BEAM SECTION
W16X26
Ib =
301
in4
COLUMN SECTION
Ic =
171
in4
MB = MC =
32.9
ft-kips
Mmax =
57.1
ft-kips
W10X33

STORY HEIGHT
GRAVITY LOAD
HA = HD =
VA = VD =
LATERAL LOAD
HA = HD =
VA = VD =
w=
1.8
2.4
kips
18.0
L=
h=
ft
ft
20
14
klf
kips
P=
15
7.5
kips
10.5
kips
kips
1.232
V A =V D =
MB = MC = 105.0 ft-kips
H = 3.36 in
KH =
4.5
kips / in
GRAVITY ANALYSIS
h
=
n = Ib
Ic L
HA= HD =
M max =
wL 2
=
4h ( 3 + 2n )
2.4
kips
57.1
kips
P
=
2
7.5
kips
Ph
=
L
10.5
kips
P h 3 (1 + 2n )
=
12nE I c
3.36
in
w L 2 ( 2n + 1)
=
8 ( 2n + 3 )
wL
=
2
18.0
MB = MC =
kips
wL 2
=
4 ( 3 + 2n )
32.9
ft-kips
105.0
ft-kips
LATERAL ANALYSIS
HA= HD =
V A =V D =
H =
E =
29000
MB =MC =
ksi
Ph
=
2
KH =
P
H
4.5
kips / in
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Formulas of Concentrically Braced Frame

BRACE SECTION
HSS6X6X1/2
EA =

STORY HEIGHT
GRAVITY LOAD
HA = HD =
VA = VD =
NAE = NDE =
w=
1.8
15.8
kips
27.0
kips
23.1
kips
LATERAL LOAD
HA = HD =
VA = VD =
KH =
P=
15
7.5
kips
7.0
kips
1226.2 kips / in ,
L=
h=
30
14
282460 kips ,
Tube
ft
ft
klf
MBE = MEC =
ME =
28.5
50.6
ft-kips
ft-kips
kips
NAE = NDE = 10.3
H = 0.01
kips
in
14
GRAVITY ANALYSIS (Neglected axial deformations.)
= tan 1
h
=
0.5 L
43.03
HA= HD=
5wL
tan =
16
15.8
kips
5wL
=
16 cos
23.1
kips
N AE = N DE =
wL
=
2
27.0
kips
9wL 2
=
512
28.5
ft-kips
50.6
ft-kips
7.0
kips
V A =V D =
M BE = M EC =
wL 2
=
32
LATERAL ANALYSIS
HA= HD =
P
=
2
N AE = N DE =
H =
7.5
P
=
2 cos
PL
=
4 EAcos 3
V A =V D =
kips
10.3
kips
0.01
in
KH =
Ph
=
L
P
H
1226.2
kips / in
Daniel
Tian Li
PROJECT :
CLIENT :
JOB NO. :
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
DATE :
Formulas of Ecconcentrically Braced Frame

BRACE SECTION
HSS6X6X1/2
EA =
BEAM SECTION
EI =
W16X26

STORY HEIGHT
LINK LENGTH
GRAVITY LOAD
HA = HD =
VA = VD =
NAE = NDF =
w=
1.8
16.0
kips
27.0
kips
23.5
kips
LATERAL LOAD
P=
15
HA = HD =
7.5
kips
ME = MF =
14.0
ft-kips
QEF = VA = VD =
7.0
kips
(QEF is link shear force.)
L=
h=
e=
30
14
4
282460 kips ,
Tube
2
8729000 kips-in
ft
ft
ft
klf
MBE = MFC =
ME = MF =
25.8
24.5
ft-kips
ft-kips
kips
NAE = NDF = 11.0 kips
H = 0.04 in
KH = 384.5 kips / in
GRAVITY ANALYSIS (Neglected axial deformations.)
= tan 1
h
=
0.5 L 0.5e
wL
=
2
V A =V D =
ME=MF =
27.0
kips
HA= HD =
23.5
kips
M BE = M FC =
47.12
24.5
ft-kips , (by moment distribution procedure.)
2
2
M E + w (L e ) =
h
8h
16.0
kips
w( L e ) M E
=
32
2
25.8
ft-kips
HA =
N AE = N DF =
cos
LATERAL ANALYSIS
HA= HD =
P
=
2
N AE = N DF =
H =
7.5
P
=
2 cos
Ph
2 EAcos sin
2
Q EF = V A = V D =
kips
11.0
P h 2e 2
=
12 EIL
ME=MF =
kips
0.04
in
Ph
=
L
Peh
=
2L
7.0
kips
14.0
ft-kips
KH =
P
H
384.5 kips / in

American Structural Design Calculation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

American Structural Design Calculation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1 of 3

STRUCTURAL DESIGN SOFTWARE

A Package Only $1260 (Total 104 software listed)

Footing for DSA & OSHPD

Boundary Spring Generator

Plain Concrete Footing

Concrete Retaining Wall

Conventional Slab on Grade

Retaining Wall for DSA &

Restrained Retaining Wall

Shear Wall - IBC

Shear Wall - CBC

Column Supporting Discontinuous

Development & Splice in Concrete

(Concrete & Wood)

Bending Post at Top Wall

Masonry Shear Wall

Masonry Bearing Wall

(ACI 530 &

Horizontal Bending Wall

(ACI 530 & UBC)

Elevator Wall for DSA &

(ACI 530 & UBC)

Top Plate Connection

Wood Bolt Connection

Shear Wall with Openings

Wood Shear Wall

(Joist, Beam, Wall, Column)

Composite Floor Beam

Beam with Torsion

Lateral Analysis & Design Loads

(for IBC 2000)

Wall Lateral Force-UBC

Wind ASCE 7-02

(for IBC 2003)

Wall Lateral Force-IBC

(ASCE 7-98, ASCE 7-02, &

(IBC 2000 &

Pad Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

BASE PLATE WIDTH

BASE PLATE DEPTH

FOOTING CONCRETE STRENGTH

REBAR YIELD STRESS

AXIAL DEAD LOAD

AXIAL LIVE LOAD

LATERAL LOAD (0=WIND, 1=SEISMIC)

FOOTING EMBEDMENT DEPTH

ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE

THE PAD DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318-02 SEC.15.2.2)

where k = 1 for grovity loads, 4/3 for lateral loads.

MIN = MIN 0.0018

0.75 (ACI 318-02, Section 9.3.2.3 )

Eccentric Footing Design Based on ACI 318-02

BASE PLATE WIDTH

BASE PLATE DEPTH

LONGITUDINAL REINF., TOP

FOOTING CONCRETE STRENGTH

LONGITUDINAL REINF., BOT.

REBAR YIELD STRESS

TRANSVERSE REINF., BOT.

AXIAL DEAD LOAD

AXIAL LIVE LOAD

LATERAL LOAD (0=WIND, 1=SEISMIC)