Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Department, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Donald Ivan McCray on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chapel Hill Police Department and a police sergeant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also denied McCray's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6495

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Donald Ivan McCray on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chapel Hill Police Department and a police sergeant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also denied McCray's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    McCray v. Chapel Hill Police Department, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Donald Ivan McCray on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chapel Hill Police Department and a police sergeant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also denied McCray's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6495

    DONALD IVAN MCCRAY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT; REBECCA KOCH, Sergeant, Chapel
    Hill Police,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham.
    Paul Trevor Sharp,
    Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00984-PTS)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2008

    Decided:

    August 26, 2008

    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donald Ivan McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson,


    CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald Ivan McCray appeals the district courts* order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    McCray v.

    Chapel Hill Police Dept, No. 1:06-cv-00984-PTS (M.D.N.C., Mar. 19,


    2008).

    We also deny McCrays motion to appoint counsel.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for


    final disposition under 28 U.S.C. 636 (c) (2000).
    2

    You might also like