Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Low Voltage Analog Circuit Design Techniques: A Tutorial: Invited Paper
Low Voltage Analog Circuit Design Techniques: A Tutorial: Invited Paper
2 FEBRUARY 2000
INVITED PAPER
SUMMARY
Low voltage (LV) analog circuit design techniques are addressed in this tutorial. In particular, (i) technology considerations; (ii) transistor model capable to provide performance and
power tradeos; (iii) low voltage implementation techniques capable to reduce the power supply requirements, such as bulk-driven,
oating-gate, and self-cascode MOSFETs; (iv) basic LV building
blocks; (v) multi-stage frequency compensation topologies; and
(vi) fully-dierential and fully-balanced systems.
key words: analog circuits, ampliers, transistor model, bulkdriven, oating-gate, self-cascode, NGCC frequency compensation, fully-dierential and fully-balanced systems.
1.
Introduction
Technology Considerations and an All Region One Equation MOS Transistor Model
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
10
Power Consumption
10
10
fT
10
10
10
10
Inversion Level ( i f )
Fig. 1
v.s. if .
fT =
2( 1 + if 1)
2
2L
VDS(sat)
= ( 1 + if 1) + 4
t
W
gm
1
=
L
Cox t 1 + if 1
(1a)
(1b)
(1c)
(1d)
(1e)
(1f)
where, ID the drain current of the MOS transistor, gm the transconductance in saturation, n the
slope factor, t thermal voltage, and if = ID /IS
the inversion level of the MOS transistor.
MOS transistors work in weak inversion for if < 1,
strong inversion for if > 100, in between is the moderate inversion. Small if requires large aspect ratio
W/L and area, and large if means small area and high
speed but large current and power consumption [2], as
depicted in Fig. 1 for dierent tradeos between area,
fT and power consumption. A general expression for
VGS , if the MOSFET is saturated and VSB = 0, can be
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
written as
3.
M4
VB2
M3
VB
Vx
M2
Vx
IL
IL
RL
VB3
M2
vIN
M1
Mc
RL
Ms
M1
vIN
(a)
(b)
120
1.2
100
Ms
80
0.8
Mc
Mc
60
0.6
40
0.4
20
VB1
VGS = VT + nt [ 1 + if 2 + ln( 1 + if 1)] (1g)
0.2
Ms
0
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
Power Supply Voltage
2.6
2.8
(c)
Fig. 2
Cascode and non-cascode structures, (a) A cascode
gain stage plus output stage, (b) A simple gain stage plus output
stage, (c) normalized transistor size and normalized GBW (at
node Vx ) v.s. power supply.
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
D
G
B
SiO2
n+
n+
N Channel
P well
N substrate
Depletion layer
(a)
IB
M1
vI
IB
vO
vO
vI
VB
J1
(b)
Fig. 3
Bulk-driven MOS transistor, (a) cross section and symbol of an N-channel MOSFET in P-well technology, (b) bulkdriven MOSFET is similar to a JFET transistor.
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
Metal
Poly II
Poly I
VG1
VG2
VG3
S
CG1
VG1
VG2
VG1
VGn
VGn
CGn
CFGS
CFGB
(c) Equivalent Circuit
(a) Layout
CG2
VG2
N Diffusion
CFGD
Fig. 4
Multi-input oating-gate MOSFET, (a) layout, (b)
schematic symbol, (c) equivalent circuit
vD
M2
vG
M1
vS
Fig. 5
Self-cascode MOSFET
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
4.
Iout
M1
Vmirror
(a)
Iin
Compliance voltage is defined as the minimum DC output voltage drop at which the output branch of the current
mirror remains in saturation and still has a high output
impedance [6, pp. 380-381].
Mm
Iin
Iout
4I B
M6
80
(d)
Mc
M1
4I B Iout
Mc
70
M3
10
Mm
80
M4
10
M8
(e) 10
Iout
M2 Iout
Vcas
IB
IB
M7
10
Mm
Vmirror
Mm
Vmirror
(c)
M5
Mc
70
Iin
Mc
(b)
Vref
M1
Areg
Mc
(W/L)2
M2
Vref
Vcas
M2
(W/L)1
Iout
Iout
Vmirror
Iin
Vref
Iout Iin
Iin Vref
Mc
Aact
Mm
M1 M2
(f)
Mm
M1
(g)
(h)
Fig. 6
Current mirrors, (a) simple, (b) cascode output, (c)
regulated cascode output, (d) symmetrical regulated cascode
structure, (e) one implementation of (d), (f) high swing current mirror, (g) active-input current mirror [33], (h) active-input
regulated-cascode current mirror [33].
IB
Iin
Iout
IB
Iin
Vcas
M2
M1
M3
(a)
Iin
IB
Iout
IB
Iin
M5
M2
M4
M1
M3
M2
M4
M1
M3
(c)
(b)
V shift
Iin
M3
Iout
M1
M2
(d)
Iout
Vdd
I B1
M4 Iout
Iin
Iout
R OB
M1
A FB
M2
I B2
(e)
M1
M2
(f)
Fig. 7
Low voltage current mirrors, (a) high swing current
mirror with input current injected to the source of M3 , (b) Prodanovs structure [38], (c) Itakuras structure [39], (d,e) RamirezAngulos current mirror with input level shift [40], (f) F. Yous
structure [41].
feedback loop [33], [37] in the active-input and/or regulated cascode structures. Table 1 summarizes the key
characteristics of simple, cascode (only output part),
and active-input (only input part) current mirrors.
In addition to the structures in Fig. 6 which are
suitable for 3-V operation, there are a number of other
LV current mirrors. For some LV circuits, a low voltage
drop less than one VGS over the input node of the current mirror is required. Besides the active-input structure (Fig. 6(g,h)) which can satisfy this requirement
with a properly selected Vref , some other structures
are illustrated in Fig. 7(a,b,d,e). Fig. 7(a) is similar
to Fig. 6(f), whereas the input current is injected to
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
7
Table 1 Circuit characteristics of simple, cascode(only output), and active-input(only
input) current mirrors
Input conductance
Simple
gm1
gm1 + gds1 =
Output conductance
gds2
DC input voltage
Min. output comp. voltage
VGS
VDS(sat)
the source instead of the drain of M2, with the advantage of a lower input voltage drop. For Fig. 7(b) and
(c), the bottom transistors (M1 and M3) of the cascode structure operates in the ohmic region, thus a
lower output compliance voltage by about 0.2 to 0.4
V is achieved compared with conventional high swing
cascode structure (Fig. 6(f)). An attractive feature of
Fig. 7(b) is its extremely low input voltage drop due
to ohmic region operation of M1, which may be less
than 0.1V. However, it is more sensitive to mismatch
than conventional topologies. An Op Amp is used in
Fig. 7(c) to force M1 and M3 to have the same VDS
hence the drain currents with the same value assuming
they have the same aspect ratio. A possible modication to the circuit in Fig. 7(c) is to inject the input current at the source of M2 (node X) to obtain a
very low input voltage drop, with some minor changes
to the biasing circuitry. The cost we have to pay for
the low voltage operation of Fig. 7(a)-(c) is a slightly
degraded frequency response. One attractive LV technique to reduce headroom voltage limitations is the use
of oating voltage sources (level shifting) [1], [40], [42].
A level shifter is utilized in Fig. 7(d) to have a low input
voltage (VGS Vshif t ), one possible implementation is
depicted in Fig. 7(e) [40]. Another novel low voltage
current mirror mainly used to implement LV tail current of dierential ampliers was proposed [41] with a
negative output resistance which is approximately given
(W/L)M1
by ro = ROB
.
(W/L)M2
Observe that the simple current mirror (Fig. 6(a))
has mainly one pole in the transfer function and behaves as a rst-order low-pass lter, other more elaborated current mirrors have multiple poles. For instance,
the input stage of Fig. 6(f) and Fig. 7(a) behaves as a
second-order lter, and the designer should size transistors and/or bias currents for optimal
settling time
and frequency response, i.e., Q < 1/ 2 or equivalent
(gm2 Cp2 )/(gm1 Cp1 ) < 1/2, where Cp1 and Cp2 are the
parasitic capacitance at the drains of M1 and M2 respectively, and gm1 and gm2 are the transconductance
of these two transistors.
4.2 Dierential Input Stages
Dierential input stage plays an important role in the
Op Amps or OTAs. Its design directly aects the performance of the whole amplier such as input CMR
Cascode
/
gds,m gds,c
gm,c
/
2VDS(sat)
R2
vO
vI
R1
R2
vO vI+ R1
vI
vO-
vO
vI
R1
(a)
(b)
vO+
vI- R1
R2
(c)
R2
(d)
Fig. 8
Op Amp congurations, (a) inverting conguration,
(b) non-inverting conguration, (c) voltage follower (or voltage
buer, a special case of (b)), (d) fully-dierential conguration.
Table 2
Input common-mode swing of Op Amp congurations
Conguration
Input common-mode voltage swing
Inverting
=0
Non-inverting
VSU P R1 /(R1 + R2 )
Voltage follower
rail-to-rail
Fully-dierential
vI,CM R2 /(R1 + R2 )
VSU P is the total power supply voltage.
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
8
Summary of some constant gm techniques for N-P complementary input stage
Table 3
Principle
keep IN + IP constant [43], [44]
keep
IP
+
[45], [46]
IN
W
)
I
+
K
(
) I
or KP,N ( W
N
N
P,P
L
L P P
gm
6% for weak inversion, 40% for strong
inversion
About
10%
measured[47].
Slew Rate
Constant
2
times
variation
[47] constant
3
6
7
2
times
variation
Constant
Comments
Work well in weak inversion, not suitable
for high speed application
Depends on quadratic characteristic of
MOSFETs, which is not accurately followed by short channel transistors, and
also has some error introduced by weak
inversion operation in takeover.
1) Same with case 2, but we can change 4
to other numbers for short channel transistors. 2) +15% systematic gm variation.
Constant slew rate but +20% systematic
gm variation.
Constant
Constant
Constant
Vdd
Mb4
Vi-
M1
M4 M2
M3
IN
Mb2
Mb1
(a)
VGS,M1,2
VCMR,P
Vi+
To subsequent stages
IP
Current Summation
IB
VDS(sat),Mb4
Nonlinear
dependency
vI
vO
Op Amp with CM
dependent Vio
vI
(d)
gm N and gm P
vO
90
Vio (mV)
CMRR
4
80
70
CMRR(dB)
Only N pair
operates
VDS(sat),Mb2
-Vss
P Pair N Pair
(b)
gm T , the sum of
Both P and N
pairs operates
VGS,M3,4
Equivalent circuit
with ideal amplifier
Transconductance
Only P pair
operates
VCMR,N
Mb3
gm P
gm N
-Vss
Vdd
Common Mode Input Voltage (
(c)
v I,CM )
60
Vio
-1.0
-0.5
0.5
1.0 VI,CM(V)
(e)
Fig. 9
N-P complementary CMOS rail-to-rail input stage, (a)
basic conguration, (b) CM swings of N and P pairs (CM RP and
CM RN ), (c) gmT variations with input CM voltage, (d) the effect of CM dependent input oset voltage, (e) Vi,cm and CMRR
v.s. VI,CM of (d).
the CM swing, both of N and P pairs operate, rendering a total transconductance (gmT ) which is about
twice of that when the CM voltage is close to either
of the supply rails and only the P or N pair is operat-
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
VB
Io+
VB
IoVi- Vi+
Vi+
C1
(a)
Io+
Io+
Io-
C2
Io-
VB
C2'
ViFG+
M1 M2
IB
IB
(b)
ViIB
M2
(c)
Fig. 10
Floating-gate and bulk-driven MOS input stages, (a)
oating-gate MOS input stage, (b) equivalent circuit of (a), (c)
bulk-driven MOS input stage.
VSUP >
=
0.7
(V )
1 kin
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
10
(a)
M1
V1
vSHIFT
V3
M2
vI+
vIvSHIFT
(b)
V2
V2
RL4
Q3
IP
(f)
V I,CM
M12
M13
vI-
V 1 and V 3
IN
M14
IP
V 2 and V 4
M11
IB
IL=IMAX -(IP+IN)
0.2
0.4
0.6
V I,CM (V)
0.8
1.0
ML6
ML7
VI,CM (V)
(g)
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M6
M4
ML8
ML2
RL1
vI+
vI-
M8
M7
-Vss
M5
Current summation
Vdd
ML4
ML3
ITAIL
vI-
IB
M6
M1 M2
IB
M8
ML5
ML7
ML6
(h)
0.2
(d)
M3
ML1
IN
RL4
ML5
IL
M12
RL2
vI-
RL3
Current summation
vI+
M2
vI+
vI-
R9
IL
M10
RL1
(e)
vI+
V SHIFT
vI+
IMAX
V 1 ~V 4 and
V SHIFT (V)
0.4
Q9
R8
1.0
0.6
Q8
IL4
IB
0.8
V4
Q4
Q11
M1
(c)
V4
M4
M3
RL2
vI-
RL3
IL3
vSHIFT
vSHIFT
Q2
Vdd
M11
ML4 M9
ML3
IL
VB2
V3 Q
10
ML2
To next stage
VGS,M3,4
-Vss
-Vss P pair operates
P Pair
N Pair
Q1
R11
To next stage
R10
Level-Shift Current
Generator
VGS,M3,4
ML1
IL2
IL1
Level-Shift Current
Generator
N pair operates
To next stage
VCMR,P
VGS,M1,2
-Vss
Vdd
IL=IMAX -(IP+IN)
Vdd
VCMR,N
CM voltage
Vdd
VDS(sat),Mb4
ML8 M5
M7
-Vss
IL
(i)
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
V I,CM (V)
1.0
Fig. 11 Rail-to-rail input stage with dynamic level shift, (a) the N-P complementary input stage (Fig. 9(a)) has a dead zone in the central part of the CM swing when
VSU P < 2VT + 4VDS(sat) , (b) the problem can be solved by four level shifters, (c) 1-V
bipolar rail-to-rail input stage [54], (d) V1 V4 and VSHIF T v.s. CM input voltage, (e)
1-V CMOS rail-to-rail N-P complementary input stage [55], (f) the working principle of
level-shift current generator in (e), (g) IP , IN , and IL v.s. vICM , (h) rail-to-rail P-channel
input stage [55], (i) level-shift current v.s. vICM in (h).
shown in Fig. 11(g). The transconductance of this amplier is not constant due to its simple design. Another
Op Amp with a rail-to-rail CMR for a 1-V operation
was implemented in the same paper [55] only with a P
dierential pair. Figs. 11(h) and (i) show the circuit
schematic and level-shift current characteristics, respectively. The distortion performance is much better than
in the previous case of Fig. 11(e), as a consequence of
only using one dierential pair, and therefore, no problem with the oset voltage variation exists. However,
the price paid is a more dicult design, high input oset current, and low input impedance. The problem of
the resistor area is more critical in the approach represented in Fig. 11(e) compared with Fig. 11(h), 4 resistors are used instead of 2. Note that the input CM
range is reduced within the supply rails by the compliance voltages of the level current sources, usually, one
VDS(sat) if simple non-cascode structures are used.
4.3 Low Voltage Output Stages
According to the types of loads, the driving capability
of the output stages diers. For switched capacitor circuits which have high impedance capacitive loads, class
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
11
Vdd
v I,P
v I,P
Mp
Mp
IP
vO
IO
IN
v I,N
Mn
-Vss
(a)
IP, IN ,
and |I O |
IP
(b)
-Vss
|I O |
Vdd
M3
IB
IN
i I1
M2
IB
M6
to i I2
vI
i I2
Fig. 12
Class AB output stage, (a) common-drain voltage
follower (can not be used in low voltage ampliers), (b) commonsource structure which features a rail-to-rail swing, (c) ideal
input-output transfer characteristic for class AB output stage.
Vdd
to i I1
vO
I Q quiescent current
(c)
M4
M5
M4
V IN
M3
Mp
v O |I O |
I MIN
Mb
IB
Mn
IB
M1
M1
IB
(b)
-Vss
M2
-Vss
(a)
MbA
M3A
M4A
Vdd
Mb
M3
M4
Mp1
Vdd
Mp
V BP
V BP
M4A
MbB
M3A
to i I1
IB
IB
V BN
M1
M1A
M2A
M2
(d)
Mn1
-Vss
-Vss
I B2
Mn1
M3
Vdd
I B3
IB
Mp2
V BP
M2
i I1
Mn2
1: m
Mn
vI
(c)
vI
M2B
vO
to i I2
M1B
V BN
1: m
Mp2
Mp3
vO
Mn2
i I2
M4
I B2
Mn3
V BN
I B M1
Mp1
I B3
(e)
-Vss
Fig. 13
Class AB output stage without negative feedback
loop, (a) Monticellis class AB output stage[56], (b) simple and
(c) cascode input transconductors for (a), (d) You et als class
AB output stage[57], (e) a new class AB output stage.
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
12
Mb
M3
Vdd
M4
Mb
M3
M4
Mp1
1:m
Mp
IB
vB
vA
iFB,A
iFB,B
Class AB
feedback control
( nonlinear )
iN
vI
Mn
M1
M2
(a)
iP1=iP/m
iP
vO
iO
-Vss
vA
IB
vB
iFB,A
iFB,B
Class AB current
feedback control
( nonlinear )
iN1=iN/m
vI
M1
M2
(b)
1:m
Mn1
Vdd
Mp
iP
vO
iO
iN
Mn
-Vss
Fig. 14
Class AB output stage with negative feedback loop,
the class AB control block may sense the vGS (a) or drain currents (b) of the output transistors.
ity with Monticellis structure with improved overdrive voltage for the output transistors by VT , which
is VSUP VT 2VDS(sat) for our proposed structure,
whereas, VSUP 2VT 2VDS(sat) for Monticellis structure, with the cost of a slightly increased bias current.
This improvement is very desirable in low voltage applications due to the increased driving capability.
The characteristics of these three class AB structures are summarized in Table 4.
The working principle of the class AB control with
a feedback loop is depicted in Fig. 14. The class AB
control block may sense the vGS (Fig. 14(a)) or the
drain currents (by Mn1 and Mp1, Fig. 14(b)) of the
output transistors, and generates currents iF B,A and
iF B,B (usually iF B,A = iF B,B ) and feeds them back
to some high impedance nodes in the signal path, most
often, the gates of the output transistors. Note that
the common-mode voltage of VA and VB controls the
dierence of iP and iN , which actually is the output
current iL ; whereas the dierence of VA and VB controls the common-mode current of iP and iN , which
is the quiescent current of the output transistors. The
class AB feedback control intrinsically has a nonlinear
behavior, which can be implemented by nonlinear circuitry. There are several implementations of the class
AB control block in Fig. 14(a)(b), mainly including,
i) minimum selectors [45], [59], [61], which are derived
from [58], and ii) MTL (MOS Translinear Loop) [62]
based [1, pp. 259-263], [46], [47].
5.
In Section 3.1, we have discussed the diculties involved in the design of high gain very low voltage ampliers because of the stability considerations of multistage structures. NGCC (Nested Gm -C Compensation) [4] is an excellent multi-stage frequency compensation technique which could lead to a simple design
procedure and better predictable performance compared with NMC (Nested Miller Compensation) [11]
and other multi-stage frequency compensation techniques. We will reformulate the equations in this section by considering the parasitic capacitors in the internal nodes, since in LV LP design, transistors usually
1 s/z
s2 /(p1 f2 ) + s/p1 + 1
(4)
gm1 gm2
gm2
gm1
f1
where A0 =
, z =
, p1 =
=
,
go1 gL
Cm
Cm A0
A0
gm1
gm2
.
, f2 =
f1 =
Cm
CL (1 + Cp1 /CL + Cp1 /Cm )
gm2
One RHP (Right Half Plane) zero z =
is inCm
troduced due to the direct high frequency signal path
through Cm , which degrades the stability of the amplier in close loop. A gmf 1 feedforward path could
be used to eliminate the RHP zero. This technique
is depicted in Fig. 15(c). The transfer function of the
amplier is still like Eq. (4), but the zero changes to
z=
Cm
gm2
1
gmf 1 (Cm + Cp1 )
gm1 gm2
Cm
, z goes to , thus Eq. (4)
Cm + Cp1
yields
Av (s) = A0
s2 /(p
1
1 f2 ) + s/p1 + 1
(5)
n
sn
i=2
fi
p1
sn1
n1
i=2
A0
+ +
f
i
s2
p1 f2
s
p1
+1
(6)
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
13
Table 4
Cm
gm1
vi
gm2
Cp1
vo
vi
gm1
vo
gL
go1 CL
Cp1
go1
Cm1
Cm2
Cm
gm1
vi
Cp1
vo
gm2
go1
gL
(b)
(a)
gmf1
gm2
CL
vi
vo
gm1
gL
CL
gm2
gm3
CL
gL
gmf2
(c)
gmf1
Cm1
(d)
Cm2
Cm(n-1)
vi
gm1
gm(n-1)
gm2
gmn
CL vo
gL
Yous [57]
VT + 2VDS(sat)
VSU P VT VDS(sat)
Low
No
gmf(n-1)
Av,DM,cl =
gmf2
(e)
gmf1
Fig. 15
Two-stage cascade, Miller compensated, and NGCC
(Nested Gm C Compensation) amplier topologies, (a) 2-stage
cascaded amplier, (b) Miller compensated 2-stage amplier, (c)
Gm C feedforward principle, (d) 3-stage NGCC amplier, (e)
n-stage nested Gm C compensation topology.
where A0 =
n1
gmi gmn
i=1
goi
gL
, p1 =
gm1
f1
=
,
Cm1 A0
A0
gm1
gmi 1
, fi =
(i from 2 to n 1), and
Cm1
Cmi 1 + ki
gmn
1
.
fn =
n1
mi ki
CL 1 +
(1 + kn1 )
f1 =
i=1 1+ki
Detailed NGCC amplier design methodology, stability, bandwidth and settling considerations, as well as
CMOS implementations and experimental results, are
found in [3], [4].
6.
Proposed
2VT + 3VDS(sat)
VSU P VT 2VDS(sat)
High
Yes
2
Av,DM,ol R1 +R
vo+ vo
2
R2
=
=
1
vi+ vi
R1
Av,DM,ol R1R+R
+
1
2
(7)
vO,CM
ACMF B + 1
(8)
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
14
v' O-
v i-
v o+
Fully
Differential
System
v o-
v I+
V REF
v I-
v O,CM
(a)
CMFB loop
Main Amplifier
(c)
v i+ R1
R2
v o-
v i- R1
v o+
R2
g mf2
CM Output
Voltage
Extraction
g mf3
g m1D
v O+
A CMFB
A' CMFB
(e)
v O,CM
(v o+ +v o-)/2
v I-
V REF
v OOutput CM
Voltage
Extraction
v O+
C m2
C m1
v ERR
g mf1C
V REF
C m1
C p rp
v O-
C m2
C m3
v I,DM
V REF
g m1D
CM first stage
-v I,DM
DM first stage
(v O+ +v O- )/2- V REF
g m1C
(v O+ +v O- )/2
(f)
CL
v O+
V REF
v I,DM
v I+
g m4
g mf1C
DM first stage
(b)
g m3
C m3
g m1C
(d)
g m2
-v I,DM
v' O+
v' O,CM
=(v' O+ +v' O-)/2
g mf1D
v O-
A CMFB
(v o+ +v o-)/2
v i+
g m2
g m3
v O+
C p rp
Gain stages shared
by DM and CM
g m4
v OCL
g mf3
g mf2
(g)
g mf1D
Fig. 16 Fully dierential and fully-balanced systems, (a) fully-dierential system, (b)
a conceptual fully-dierential amplier, (c) conceptual common-mode feedback (CMFB)
working principle, (d) simplied diagram of CMFB circuit, (e) CMFB implementation principle, (f) transform single-ended ampliers to fully-dierential one by simple modication,
(g) an example: a fully-balanced NGCC amplier.
(9c)
(9d)
where gm1 and gmf 1 are the rst stage transconductances of the main and feedforward branches of singleended NGCC amplier, as depicted in Fig. 15.
The output CM voltage extractor can be implemented via an RC voltage divider for Op Amps, as
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
15
7.
Vdd
v O+
R
C
v O- v
O+
M1
R
v O,CM C
(a)
IB
Vdd
M2
R
v O,CM C
M6
IB
-Vss
(b)
i ERR =I 1 -I 2
v O+
M1 M2
M3
M4
(c)
v O+
v O-
V REF
IB
-Vss
v O-
IB
-Vss
I1
M1
I1
M2
IB
Conclusions
v O-
V REF
(d)
Fig. 17
Common-mode voltage detector schemes, (a) RC voltage divider, (b) common-drain voltage follower and RC voltage divider, (c) balanced double-dierential-pair structure, (d)
oating-gate common-mode voltage detector.
A number of topics concerning low voltage analog circuit design were reviewed. The one-equation MOSFET
model for all operation regions is an excellent tool to optimize circuit performance between dierent tradeos,
such as power consumption, silicon area and speed, for
LV LP analog design. Although there are some performance degradations for the bulk-driven and oatinggate MOSFET transistors, they are very useful components in specic LV applications. Self-cascode structure is a viable way to increase the output impedance of
short channel transistors. We also reviewed a number
of key building blocks for LV analog circuits. Then, we
reformulated the NGCC equations for designing LV LP
multi-stage ampliers. Fully dierential and balanced
systems are revisited in the last part of this paper.
Acknowledgment
The authors want to express their sincere thanks to
Prof. Takahiro Inoue and his group for the technical,
moral and nancial supports for this invited paper.
We also wish to thank Drs. Schneider, Galup-Montoro,
Duque-Carrillo, C
ilingiro
glu and Ramirez-Angulo for
their valuable comments and suggestions.
References
[1] E. S
anchez-Sinencio and A. G. Andreou, Ed.,
LowVoltage/Low-Power Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE
Press, 1999.
[2] A. I. A. Cunha, M. C. Schneider, and C. Galup-Montoro,
An MOS transistor model for analog circuit design, IEEE
J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 15101519, Oct.
1998.
[3] X. Xie, M. C. Schneider, E. S
anchez-Sinencio, and
S. H. K. Embabi,
Sound design of low power
nested transconductnce-capacitance compensation ampliers, Electronics Letters, vol. 35, pp. 956958, June 1999.
[4] F. You, S. H. K. Embabi, and E. S
anchez-Sinencio, Multistage amplier topologies with nested gm-C compensation,
IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 20002011,
Dec. 1997.
[5] F. You, Low Voltage Analog Circuit Design, Ph.D. thesis,
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, U. S.
A., Dec. 1996.
[6] K. R. Laker and W. M. C. Sansen, Design of Analog Integrated Circiuts and Systems, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York,
1994.
[7] Y. P. Tsividis and K. Suyama, MOSFET modeling for analog circuit CAD: problems and prospects, IEEE J. SolidState Circuits, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 210216, March 1994.
[8] C. C. Enz, F. Krummenacher, and E. A. Vittoz, An analytical MOS transistor model valid in all regions of operation and dedicated to low-voltage and low-current applications, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing,
vol. 8, pp. 83114, 1995.
[9] O. C. F. Gouveia, A. I. A. Cunha, M. C. Schneider, and
C. Galup-Montoro, The ACM model for circuit simulation
and equations for SMASH, see http://www.dolphin.fr.
IEICE TRANS. ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. E00A, NO. 2 FEBRUARY 2000
16
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
YAN and SANCHEZ-SINENCIO: LOW VOLTAGE ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN TECHNIQUES: A TUTORIAL
17
[48] R. Hogervorst, S. M. Safai, and J. H. Huijsing, A programmable 3-V CMOS rail-to-rail opamp with gain boosting for driving heavy loads, IEEE Proc. ISCAS 95, pp.
15441547, 1995.
[49] W. Redman-White, A high bandwidth constant gm and
slew-rate rail-to-rail CMOS input circuit and its application to analog cells for low voltage VLSI systems, IEEE J.
Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 701712, May 1997.
[50] C. Hwang, A. Motamed, and M. Ismail, LV opamp with
programmable rail-to-rail constant-gm, IEEE Proc. ISCAS 97, vol. 3, pp. 19881991, 1997.
[51] R. Hogervost, J. P. Tero, and J. H. Huijsing, Compact
CMOS constant-gm rail-to-rail input stage with gm-control
by an electronic zener diode, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits,
vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 10351040, July 1996.
[52] M. Wang, T. L. Mayhugh, Jr., S. H. K. Embabi, and
E. S
anchez-Sinencio, Constant-gm rail-to-rail CMOS opamp input stage with overlapped transition region, IEEE
J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 148156, Feb.
1999.
[53] J. F. Duque-Carrillo, J. M. Valverde, and R. Perez-Aloe,
Constant-gm rail-to-rail common-mode range input stage
with minimum CMRR degradation, IEEE J. Solid-State
Circuits, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 661666, June 1993.
[54] J. Fonderie, M. M. Maris, and E. J. Schnitger, 1-V operational amplier with rail-to-rail input and output ranges,
IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 15511559,
Dec. 1989.
[55] J. F. Duque-Carrillo, J. L. Ausin, G. Torelli, J. M. Valverde,
and M. A. Dominguez, 1-V rail-to-rail operational ampliers in standard CMOS technology, IEEE J. Solid-State
Circuits, Jan. 2000, to appear.
[56] D. M. Monticelli, A quad CMOS single-supply Op Amp
with rail-to-rail output swing, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 10261034, Dec. 1986.
[57] F. You, S. H. K. Embabi, and E. S
anchez-Sinencio, Lowvoltage class AB buers with quiescent current control,
IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 915920,
June 1998.
[58] E. Seevinck, W. de Jager, and P. Buitendijk, A lowdistortion output stage with improved stability for monolithic power ampliers, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol.
23, no. 3, pp. 794801, June 1988.
[59] F. N. L. Opt Eynde, P. F. M. Ampe, L. Verdeyen, and
W. M. C. Sansen, A CMOS large-swing low-distortion
three-stage class AB power amplier, IEEE J. Solid-State
Circuits, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 265273, Feb. 1990.
[60] R. Hogervost, J. P. Tero, R. G. H. Eschauzier, and J. H.
Huijsing, A compact power-ecient 3-V CMOS rail-to-rail
input/output operational amplier for VLSI cell libraries,
IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 15051513,
Dec. 1994.
[61] K.-J. de Langen and J. H. Huijsing, Compact low-voltage
power-ecient CMOS operational amplier cells for VLSI,
IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 14821496,
Oct. 1998.
[62] E. Seevinck and R. J. Wiegerrink, Generalized translinear
circuit principle, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 26, no.
8, pp. 10981102, Aug. 1991.
[63] G. Xu, S. H. K. Embabi, P. Hao, and E. S
anchez-Sinencio,
A low-voltage fully dierential nested gm capacitance compensation amplier: analysis and design, IEEE Proc. ISCAS 99, vol. 2, pp. 606609, 1999.
[64] Z. Czarnul, T. Itakura, N. Dobashi, T. Ueno, T. Iida, and
H. Tanimoto, Design of fully balanced analog systems
based on ordinary and/or modied single-ended opamps,
IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, vol. E82-A, no. 2, pp. 256
Shouli YAN
was born in Anqiu, P.
R. China, in January 1972. He received
the B. S. degree in Electronic Engineering and M. S. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Shanghai Jiao
Tong University, P. R. China in 1992 and
1995, respectively. He worked as a lecturer and researcher at Electronic Engineering Department of the same university from 1995 to 1997. Currently he is
pursuing his Ph.D. degree in the Department of Electrical Engineering, Analog and Mixed-Signal Center,
Texas A&M University, College Station. His research interest is
in the area of low voltage VLSI analog and mixed-signal circuit
design. E-mail: slyan@ee.tamu.edu
Edgar SANCHEZ-SINENCIO
was born in Mexico City, Mexico, in October 1944. He received the degree in
communications and electronic engineering (Professional degree) from the National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico,
Mexico City, the M.S.E.E. degree from
Stanford University, CA, and the Ph.D.
degree from the University of Illinois at
Champaign-Urbana, in 1966, 1970, and
1973, respectively. He worked as a Research Assistant at the Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois (1971-1973). In 1974 he held an industrial PostDoctoral position with the Central Research Laboratories, Nippon Electric Company, Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan. From 1976 to
1983 he was the Head of the Department of Electronics at the
Instituto Nacional de Astrofisica, Optica y Electr
onica (INAOE),
Puebla, Mexico. He was a Visiting Professor in the Department
of Electrical Engineering at Texas A&M University, College Station, during the academic years of 1979-1980 and 1983-1984. He
is currently the TI Chair Professor in Analog Engineering at
Texas A&M University and Director of the Analog and MixedSignal Center. He was the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II for 1997-1999. He is coauthor of the book Switched Capacitor Circuits (Van NostrandReinhold 1984). He is co-editor of the book Low-Voltage/LowPower Integrated Circuits (IEEE Press 1999). He received the
1995 Guillemin-Cauer Award for his work on Cellular Networks.
He was also the co-recipient of the 1997 Darlington Award for
his work on high-frequency lters. His present interests are in
the area of active lter design, RF-Communication circuits and
analog and mixed-mode circuit design. He is an IEEE Fellow
Member. E-mail: sanchez@ee.tamu.edu