Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HSE SPECIFICATION
Document Authorisation
Document Authority
dapo Oguntoyinbo
Ref. Ind: CSM
Date: 15/07/02
Document Custodian
Hamad Khalfeen
Ref. Ind: CSM/11
Date: 15/07/02
Document Author
Hamad Khalfeen
Ref. Ind: CSM/11
Date: 15/07/02
The following is a brief summary of the four most recent revisions to this document. Details of all
revisions prior to these are held on file by the Document Custodian.
Version No.
Rev 2.0
Rev 1.0
Date
June 2002
July 1998
Rev 0.0
March
1990
Author
Hamad Khalfeen
Scope / Remarks
Editorial changes, new format
Updated to Incorporate Fire & Explosion
Strategies
Original issue as ERD 88-02
User Notes:
The requirements of this document are mandatory. Non-compliance shall only be authorised by CSM
through STEP-OUT approval.
A controlled copy of the current version of this document is on PDO's EDMS. Before making reference
to this document, it is the user's responsibility to ensure that any hard copy, or electronic copy, is
current. For assistance, contact the Document Custodian.
This document is the property of Petroleum Development Oman, LLC. Neither the whole nor any part of
this document may be disclosed to others or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in
any form by any means (electronic, mechanical, reprographic recording or otherwise) without prior
written consent of the owner.
Users are encouraged to participate in the ongoing improvement of this document by providing
constructive feedback.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page ii
HSE SPECIFICATION
Contents
1.0
INTRODUCTION............................................................................5
1.1 PURPOSE...................................................................................................... 5
1.1.1 Objectives............................................................................................ 5
1.2 SCOPE.......................................................................................................... 5
1.3 DEFINITION.................................................................................................... 6
1.4 DELIVERABLES................................................................................................ 6
1.5 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES...........................................................................6
1.6 PERFORMANCE MONITORING.............................................................................6
1.7 REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT..............................................................................7
1.8 REPORTING FORMAT........................................................................................7
2. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.......................................................8
2.1 BASIS........................................................................................................... 8
2.2 ROLE OF PRE-FIRE PLANNING IN SYSTEM DESIGN.................................................9
2.3 FERM ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES......................................................9
2.4 APPLICATION OF FIRE AND EXPLOSION STRATEGIES DURING DESIGN.......................10
2.4.1 Modifications to Existing Facilities.....................................................10
2.4.2 Green Field Facilities.........................................................................10
3.0
3.1 GENERAL.................................................................................................... 13
3.1.1 Fire Proofing of Supporting Structures...............................................13
3.2 HYDROCARBON HANDLING FACILITIES...............................................................13
3.2.1 Wellheads..........................................................................................13
3.2.2 Oil/Gas Inlet Manifolds.......................................................................13
3.2.3 Gathering, Production Stations & Storage Tanks...............................13
3.2.4 Gas Processing Facilities....................................................................21
3.2.5 Booster Stations................................................................................22
3.3 UTILITY FACILITIES........................................................................................23
3.3.1 Power Stations...................................................................................23
3.3.2 Control and Auxiliary Rooms..............................................................23
3.3.3 Electrical Substations and Switchgear Rooms...................................23
3.4 OFFICE BUILDINGS, RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS....................................23
3.4.1 General.............................................................................................. 23
3.4.2 Plans and Procedures........................................................................24
3.4.3 Office Buildings.................................................................................24
3.4.4 Residential Areas...............................................................................25
3.4.5 Industrial Areas.................................................................................25
3.5 AIRSTRIPS................................................................................................... 26
3.5.1 Aircraft rescue and fire fighting.........................................................26
3.5.2 Mobile Equipment..............................................................................26
3.5.3 Air strip buildings...............................................................................26
4.0
DETECTION SPECIFICATIONS.......................................................27
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page iii
HSE SPECIFICATION
7.0
ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................49
8.0
REFERENCES..............................................................................51
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page iv
HSE SPECIFICATION
1.0Introduction
1.1
Purpose
This Specification provides users with a standard specification for the level
of fire and explosion mitigation measures that are tailored to typical
facilities in PDO.
This document incorporates the latest international standards, DEPs and
the EP 95-0000 guidelines dealing with fire protection. In addition, this
Specification incorporates the findings and recommendations from three
fire protection related studies, namely:
The studies established the actual risk from fires and explosions in PDOs
facilities and have determined the appropriate level of control to mitigate
the consequences in the event of a fire/explosion using QRA and Cost
Benefit Analysis.
This Specification should be used to assist engineers define the
appropriate fire and gas detection and protection equipment, where there
is a wide range of size and criticality of equipment (e.g. shipping pumps
and cone roofed storage tanks) that deviates from the typical. The
Specification describes a simple methodology that is appropriate to the
level of business risk of the facility concerned.
Reference is made in this Specification to the FERM Facility Plan Guideline,
GU 230 (Reference 6), which provides additional information in applying
the standards.
1.1.1
Objectives
This Specification has the following objectives, to:
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 5
HSE SPECIFICATION
1.2
Scope
This Specification covers the requirements for fire and gas detection and
protection in PDO facilities. These requirements shall be applied when
making plant modifications and when designing new facilities.
The Specification covers both green field facilities and modifications to
existing plant. Due consideration to cost effectiveness shall be taken into
account when applying these standards to existing facilities, particularly
over the remaining plant life. The scope of the Specification also includes
the preparation of a fire response document pertaining to the facility being
designed or modified and the incorporation of these in the relevant
operational documents. The approach is in line with EP 95-351, Fire
Control and Recovery.
1.3
Definition
This Specification draws upon a number of relevant international sources
to define the requirements for management of fire and explosion risks.
Where a user is referred to another standard, the latest edition of the
relevant standard shall be used. In the event of discrepancies between
sources, the order of precedence shall be:
1.
This Specification & other PDO standards referred to in this
Specification
2.
SIEP DEPs
3.
International Standards
4.
EP95000 series publications
A reference list of all the standards, specifications and codes used
throughout this document is provided in Appendix A.
This Specification also relies on the use of a large amount of acronyms and
abbreviations that may not be familiar to personnel who dont have
experience in fire protection. A glossary of terms is provided in Section 7 of
this Specification to aid in the understanding of personnel unfamiliar with
any terms used within.
1.4 Deliverables
1.4.1 Records
Records produced as a result of the use of this Specification will be
incorporated into design documentation and the FERM Facility Plan.
1.4.2
Reports
PDO Staff: Any non-compliance with this Specification shall be notified,
investigated and reported as per CP 122 HSE Management System Manual,
Part 2, Chapter 6.
Contractors: Any non-compliance with this Specification shall be reported
to the Contract Holder.
1.5
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 6
HSE SPECIFICATION
Design Engineers
Design Engineers are responsible for the
requirements provided in this Specification.
implementation
of
the
1.6
Performance Monitoring
Compliance with this Specification shall be monitored through workplace
supervision, periodic site inspection and design reviews such as hazard
and operability (HAZOP) studies.
1.7
1.8
Reporting Format
There are no routine
Specification.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
reporting
Page 7
requirements
pertaining
to
this
HSE SPECIFICATION
2. Performance Requirements
2.1
Basis
The risks due to fire and explosions of existing typical assets in PDO were
assessed using a Risk Matrix (see Appendix B). This was used to rank the
relative risk to the various types of facilities and illustrates the rationale of
the decisions taken at that time. Based on this evaluation, four different
strategy levels for addressing fire and explosion incidents within PDO have
been developed. These are defined as:
Strategy 1
Minor Incident Intervention Only
Response limited to trained personnel using portable extinguishers or
other types of first aid fighting equipment (hand-held or mobile). In
addition, in critical areas such as some areas of camps, automatic
detection systems may be provided to provide fast alarm and personnel
escape.
Strategy 2
REVISION 2.0
Page 8
HSE SPECIFICATION
LIFE
SAFETY
ENVIRONMENT
STRATEGY 1
MINOR INCIDENT
INTERVENTION
ONLY
ASSET
REPUATION
Remote manifolds
Gathering stations Type A
Camps
Camps
STRATEGY 2
DEDICATED
FIXED FIRE
PROTECTION
SYSTEMS
STRATEGY 3
SYSTEMS/EQPT
PLUS BACK-UP
STRATEGY 4
SYSTEMS/EQPT
PLUS BRIGADE
2.2
BUSINESS
Mina Al Fahal
Airstrips
Airstrips
2.3
SP-1075
Life safety
Damage to the environment
Lost and deferred production
Loss of assets (facility)
Reputation
REVISION 2.0
Page 9
HSE SPECIFICATION
2.4.2
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 10
HSE SPECIFICATION
FIGURE 2.4.1
FIRE PROTECTION STRATEGY
MODIFICATIONS
Assess impact on
existing fire and
explosion strategy
Conceptual
design
yes
Do the
modifications
change the
existing
strategy?
no
Up or down grade
the FERM strategy
Do the
mofications
change the
station
category?
yes
Amend FERM
Facility Plan
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 11
no
No Change
HSE SPECIFICATION
FIGURE 2.4.2
FIRE PROTECTION STRATEGY
GREEN FIELD FACILITIES
Conceptual design
QRA
Incorporate into
emergency
procedures
Determine strategy level
Is strategy level
covered by
specification?
Obtain approval
from CSM for new
strategy level
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 12
Proceed with
design of fire
protection system
HSE SPECIFICATION
General
This section identifies the requirements for the various types of fire and
gas detection and protection equipment for each of the major types of
location and production facilities.
Appendix D Typical Alarms and Executive Actions, summarises the
general levels of detection and protection for generic equipment types that
are required to meet the fire and explosion strategies for typical facilities.
These tables provide an overview only and the engineer shall determine
the applicability of the standard protection levels proposed in this
Specification when the facilities being designed deviate significantly from
other common PDO facilities.
Specific engineering & design details for the detection and protection
systems are given in Sections 4 and 5 of this Specification.
3.1.1
3.2
3.2.1
Wellheads
Generally, no fire or gas detection shall be provided for wellheads.
However, heat detection shall be provided on wellheads fitted with
actuated ESD valves, SSVs, SCSSVs and ESPs and upon fire detection, the
valves shall close or pumps shutdown.
3.2.2
3.2.3
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 13
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 14
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 15
HSE SPECIFICATION
Electric Drivers
Heat detection of the windings in accordance with DEP 33.66.05.31,
Electric Motors - Cage Induction and Synchronous Type, shall be provided
as an integral part of the electric motor design.
Floating Roof Storage Tanks
The tanks shall be bunded in accordance with ERD 09-02, Spacing of Tanks
and Tank Bunding Requirements.
Basic process protection from primary safety features, such as tank level
measurement with level alarms, an independent high level alarm and trip
and automatic ESD inlet and outlet valves shall be installed in accordance
with ERD 08-11, Isolation of Process Equipment.
Further fire risk reducing measures consist of:
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 16
HSE SPECIFICATION
Roof Tanks and Shipping Pumps, Report no. EWE 63273, 1997). Worked
examples are provided in Appendix E.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 17
HSE SPECIFICATION
The relative risk reduction of each option has been plotted as a histogram
in Figure 3.2.3 (a).
Each bar of the histogram shows the distribution of damage, which covers
3 damage categories:
The Y axis gives the risk index, which can be used to determine the
differential risk reduction factor introduced by the various mitigation
methods.
It can be seen that as the various mitigation methods are introduced not
only is there a reduction in overall risk but that the damage distribution
changes to give less severe consequences.
Figure 3.2.3 (a)
100
100%
90
80
71
Fire Damage
71%
70
Loss of 1 Tank
66%
66
Loss of 2 Tanks
RISK INDEX
60
50
Loss of 1
Tank
Loss of 2
Tanks
40
36%
36
33
29
33%
29%
30
20
Fire Damage
Fire Damage
Fire Damage
0.5
Base Case
0.78
+Heat Detection
0.22
0.71
0.2
0.6
0.32
0.6
0.35
0.04
0.08
0.09
0.5
0.05
10
0.68
0.28
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 18
HSE SPECIFICATION
-4
x 486 =)
1
2
x
$
$
Note 1: The value may be updated from time to time and users shall check
the latest value with the Company's Corporate Economics and Production
Planning Department
The risk differential values (in US$) (justified project cost of mitigation)
may be found by multiplying the percentage difference in risk, taken from
the histogram, by the PV base case cost of damage to give the amount
which can be spent on that mitigation system.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 19
HSE SPECIFICATION
Shipping Pumps
The installation of shipping pumps shall include basic process protection
from primary safety features, such as dual seals with primary seal failure
detection, vibration monitoring and high temperature detection.
Automatic suction and discharge ESD isolation valves shall be installed in
accordance with ERD-08-11, Isolation of Process Equipment. The design
shall include a defined route for crude oil spill run off such that the ground
surface slopes away from equipment that has the potential to cause
escalation. The direction of the slope shall also consider fire spread and
damage to protection systems and equipment.
Further fire risk reducing measures consist of:
Crude oil vapour detection
Heat switch fire detection
Foam/water sprinkler system
The appropriate level of protection shall be determined on a case by case
basis. Based on detailed QRA on a range of shipping pumps in PDO, a
methodology has been developed to screen the economic justification of
each risk reducing option (ref. Quantitative Risk Assessment for ConedRoof Tanks and Shipping Pumps, Report no. EWE 63273, 1997). A worked
example is provided in Appendix E.
The relative risk reduction of each option has been plotted in the following
histogram Figure 3.2.3 (b).
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 20
HSE SPECIFICATION
100
90
80
Minor
Damage
No Damage
Major Plant
Damage
Fire Damage
70
60
Fire
Damage
RISK INDEX
50
Major
Damage
40
33.1%
33
30
27.3%
27
23
21
23.4%
21.5%
4.3
0.5
Base Case
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
0.28
+Fire Detection
0.69
Page 21
0.524
0.816
0.29
0.2
Day Manning+
Fire Det'n
0.486
0.86
Day Manning+
Fire Det'n &
Vapour Det'n
0.29
0.32
Day Manning+
Fire Det'n &
Sprinklers
0.486
0.064
0.074
0.003
Fire
Damage
Minor
Damage
4.7%
No Damage
0.04
0.097
0.004
Fire
Damage
0.021
Minor Damage
5.6%
No Damage
0.28
0.451
0.083
0.096
0.004
0.02
0.81
0.005
Minor Damage
Minor Damage
0.052
0.127
0.012
7.2%
Fire
Damage
0.017
0.5
0.03
5.6
4.7
Fire Damage
0.002
10
Minor Damage
20
4.3%
0.86
Day Manning+
Fire Det'n &
Vapour Det'n &
Sprinklers
HSE SPECIFICATION
Each bar of the above histogram shows the distribution of damage that
covers 4 damage categories and includes the no damage category:
The Y axis gives the risk index that can be used to determine the
differential risk reduction factor introduced by the various mitigation
methods.
It can be seen that as the various mitigation methods are introduced not
only is there a significant reduction in overall risk but that the damage
distribution changes to give less severe consequences. The no damage
category does exist for the base case but is not shown for clarity since it
represents a part of the damage distribution common to all the above
conditions. The sections of the bars above shown as no damage are purely
attributable to the introduction of mitigation. It can be seen that vapour
detection and manning give a significant benefit by increasing the no
damage allocation. This is because both can provide leak detection prior
to ignition that results in spill damage, which is considered insignificant in
comparison to fire damage.
The relevance of the active risk reducing options for any particular
location, in terms of the amount of capital which can be justified on break
even cost benefit grounds, can be determined by entering the relevant
values in the Table 3.2. This can be used to calculate the present value of
the base case cost of damage per pump set for any particular installation
which equates to 100 on the previous risk histogram (Figure 3.2.3 (b)).
The methodology described below is suitable for screening the cost
benefits of fire protection to within 25% (50/50). In the event the
economic justification is marginal, other factors such as loss of reputation
shall be considered. Alternatively a detailed QRA and cost benefit analysis
may be performed to arrive at the appropriate level of protection.
A worked example is given in Appendix E.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 22
HSE SPECIFICATION
TABLE 3.2
BASE CASE COST OF DAMAGE CALCULATION PRO-FORMA
System Constant
0.12402
based on frequency of damage x days lost for 3 pumps:
-4
(3.18x10 x 130 x 3 = )
Pump Type for centrifugal/axial or screw pumps use x 1
for reciprocating pumps use x 10
Number of Pumps in Set for 2 pumps use x 0.6
for 3 pumps use x 1.0
for 4 pumps use x 1.46
for 5 pumps use x 2.0
1
x
x
X
$
$
Note 1: The value may be updated from time to time and users shall check
the latest value with the Company's Corporate Economics and Production
Planning Department.
The risk differential values (in US$) (justified project cost of mitigation)
may be found by multiplying the percentage difference in risk, taken from
the histogram, by the PV base case cost of damage to give the amount
which can be spent on that mitigation system.
3.2.4
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 23
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
Booster Stations
The overall strategy for pipeline booster stations is level 2. The fire
protection specifications of the individual equipment in such facilities are
similar to equipment in production and gathering stations.
REVISION 2.0
Page 24
HSE SPECIFICATION
3.3
3.3.1
Utility Facilities
Power Stations
Turbine Driven Generation Sets
The overall strategy is level 2 fixed fire systems for the turbine driver
only (see 3.2.3, Gas Turbine Drivers).
Generators shall be provided with heat detection and UV flame detection
over the main areas.
Auxiliary Diesel Generator
The overall strategy is level 2 fixed fire systems.
Auxiliary diesel generators shall be provided with heat detection and an
automatic extinguishing system, typically a self-contained dry powder
system, or a fine water spray system. Installation of such systems
generally require that the engine is enclosed and not subject to any local
air movement, which should be the case when the engine has tripped and
the mechanically driven cooling fan has stopped.
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.4
3.4.1
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 25
HSE SPECIFICATION
No Smoking signs
No smoking signs shall be clearly displayed in all areas where smoking is
prohibited.
Visual alarms
The main visual alarm interface shall be the fire detection panel. This shall
be located at the main entrance to the building. The panel shall clearly
highlight which detection circuit has been activated and the area of the
building affected.
Audible Alarm
In residential areas the audible alarm shall be in the form of a horn or bell.
Escape Routes
All escape routes and exit doorways shall be provided with emergency
lighting where required. They shall be marked with luminous or illuminated
signs
Fire Wardens
Fire Wardens signs shall be clearly displayed in all critical areas
Fire Extinguishers
A suitable number of hand-held extinguishers shall be provided at strategic
locations. If a fire water system is installed then hose reels shall also be
provided at strategic locations.
Manual Alarm Call-points
Manual Alarm Call (MAC) points shall be installed at the main exits, at all
emergency exits and along corridors at intervals not exceeding 100m. The
design of MACs shall conform to BS 5839 Part 2, and may either be of the
hammer/break glass or push/break glass type.
3.4.2
Office Buildings
All flammable liquids, including photocopier toners, cleaning solvents and
draughtsmans sprays shall be stored in metal cabinets away from sources
of ignition such as heat or naked flame.
For locations containing critical computer equipment, consideration should
also be given to the installation of an incipient smoke detection system
which would only be used for very early alarm purposes.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 26
HSE SPECIFICATION
Residential Areas
Kitchens
In all kitchens serving a residential camp CO 2 or foam extinguishers and a
fire blanket shall be provided. Fire blankets shall be woven glass fibre
tested to BS 476 Parts 4 and 7.
Heat detection shall be installed in the kitchen hood. Activation of the
detector shall:
On line gas bottles for use in kitchens shall be located outside. If the
bottles are closer than 5 metres from combustible materials a block work
separation wall shall be constructed. Any enclosure for gas bottles shall be
freely ventilated.
3.4.5
Industrial Areas
Laboratories
Fire protection in laboratories shall be designed in accordance with DEP
34.17.10.31. On line gas bottles for use in laboratories shall be located
outside. If the bottles are closer than 5 metres from combustible materials
a block work separation wall shall be constructed. Any enclosure for gas
bottles shall be freely ventilated.
Workshops
In workshops free of dust and vapours, smoke detection shall be provided.
In workshops areas where smoke detectors may become quickly
contaminated due to dust and vapours, heat detection shall be provided
instead of smoke detection. The location of such heat detectors is critical
as a fire can become well established before activating a heat detector.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 27
HSE SPECIFICATION
3.5
Airstrips
3.5.1
3.5.2
Mobile Equipment
The principle requirement is rapid response such that in the event of a
crash on landing or take-off a fire engine could reach the plane before
ignition of any spilt aviation fuel, hence the need for four-wheel drive.
For mobile fire fighting equipment reference should be made to DEP
80.47.10.32, General and for fire fighting vehicles, DEP 80.47.10.33.
3.5.3
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 28
HSE SPECIFICATION
4.0Detection Specifications
4.1
Detection Systems
The design of fire and gas detection systems for green-field sites shall be
in accordance with DEP 32.80.10.10, General, and if a PLC based system is
used, DEP 32.80.10.30, General. For brown-field sites, the existing system
design philosophy should be followed. Determination of revealed and
unrevealed failure robustness shall be in accordance with DEP 32.80.10.10,
General.
The power supply to the system shall be provided with a battery back up
giving 8 hours duration, 7.75 hours at normal load and 0.25 hours at alarm
load.
4.2
4.2.1
Gas Detection
Flammable Gas Detection Philosophy
It is important that the detectors used are suitable for the type of gas that
they are intended to detect and that the test gas used is as close as
possible to the process gas.
Point type gas detectors shall be used. The use of open path gas detectors
may be considered only when used in conjunction with point type
detectors.
Flammable gas detection shall initiate alarms at alert and danger levels.
Executive actions shall only be initiated from danger level detection. The
location and number of detectors required is a function of the particular
equipment design and layout, however they shall be located over obvious
potential leak points e.g. seals.
It is recommended that the following settings be adopted as a sensible
balance between sensitivity and reliability in terms of avoiding
unnecessary activation.
TABLE 4.2
Location
General process areas
Areas where greater sensitivity is
desirable and any trip action does
not cause a major plant shutdown
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 29
Alert Level
20%LEL
10%LEL
Danger Level
50%LEL
20%LEL
HSE SPECIFICATION
4.3
4.3.1
Fire Detection
Optical Flame Detection
Infra-Red (IR) flame detectors are the preferred type for flame detection as
they are not susceptible to spurious trips, they can detect flames from
smoky fires and they can tolerate considerable dirt on the lens. They shall
be solar blind and flicker frequency sensitive for hydrocarbon fires.
Detectors should generally be located in elevated positions and aligned
downwards to gain maximum benefit from the fixed angle of sensitivity.
The use of Ultra Violet detectors in areas where arc welding, flash
photography and NDT X-Ray testing shall be carefully considered.
Detectors should be located in elevated positions looking downwards.
Consideration should be given to the possibility of smoke accumulation
preventing the detector from seeing a flame. UV detectors shall provide an
alarm signal to alert operators when the window is dirty.
Flame detection shall initiate alarms and executive actions.
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 30
HSE SPECIFICATION
4.3.5
4.3.6
Smoke Detection
Smoke Detection
Smoke detectors shall be of the optical type or ionisation type. Where
smoke detection is provided, at least one of each type shall be installed at
each location. The optimum locations for conventional smoke detectors
will be a function of the preferential air flow patterns.
Activation of a single smoke detector shall initiate alarms and executive
actions.
Note: According to BS 5839 Part 1 false alarms from smoke detectors may
be caused by fumes, dusts or condensation. Some types of ionisation
chamber type smoke detectors are highly sensitive to high air speeds and
may give false alarms.
Ionisation type detectors shall be provided with a warning that label
highlights them as a radioactive source.
Incipient Smoke Detection
The use of incipient smoke detection systems (also called VESDA - Very
Early Smoke Detection Alarm) systems) shall be considered for facilities
containing critical control monitoring systems such as control rooms,
equipment panels and substations.
This type of system is capable of detecting fire at the incipient stage up to
4 hours before flame breaks out.
The extremely high sensitivity of these systems may tend to cause alarms
occasionally under transient conditions. They should only therefore be
used to initiate alarms, not executive actions.
Note: None of these devices are suitable for fume contaminated areas
typically including vehicle exhausts or cigarette smoke, and clearly have
limited applicability in inherently dirty or dusty environments.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 31
HSE SPECIFICATION
4.4
4.4.1
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 32
HSE SPECIFICATION
5.1.1
Fire water pipework shall not pass through tank bund areas.
Fire water pipework shall not pass through areas where product
spills can accumulate underneath them.
Fire water pipework shall be at least 15m from process facilities.
REVISION 2.0
Page 33
HSE SPECIFICATION
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
SP-1075
Hydrants
Hydrants in process areas shall generally have 4 x 65mm instantaneous
coupling outlets in accordance with BS 336. Hydrants at offices, residential
and industrial areas shall generally have 2 x 65mm outlets.
REVISION 2.0
Page 34
HSE SPECIFICATION
Fire Hoses
All hoses for fire fighting purposes shall conform to the requirements of
DEP 80.47.10.32, General, Section 3.2.
5.1.5
Monitors
Fixed, manually operated water monitors shall be provided for strategy 3
facilities for specific cooling requirements, i.e. storage tanks and congested
areas as justified by risk analysis.
Self Oscillating Type Monitors
Self oscillating type monitors should be considered where identified as
advantageous. Monitors shall be located outside storage tank bund walls.
They shall not be located inside or on top of the bund.
Fixed Monitors
Fixed monitors shall be chosen to provide the stream range required to
cool the equipment for which they are provided at the design operating
pressure. The flow rate shall not be less than 2000 lpm at the design
operating pressure.
Access during a fire should be taken into account where locating fixed
monitors. The effects on firefighters from radiant heat during a storage
tank fire also need to be considered. Monitors shall be located such that
radiation (based on FRED calculations) from fires for which they are
intended will be a maximum of 5 kW/m 2 under any anticipated design
conditions. If the system is such that its user is likely to remain in the area
for extended periods (greater than 10 minutes), then screening shall be
provided to ensure that radiation levels do not exceed 1.5 kW/m2.
DEP 80.47.10.32, General, gives information regarding the requirements
for fixed monitors, and DEP 80.47.10.30, General, provides information on
water flow rates. The design of portable water monitors shall be in
accordance with DEP 80.47.10.32, General.
5.2
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 35
HSE SPECIFICATION
5.2.1
(i)
(ii)
Sprinkler Systems
Reference shall be made to DEP 80.47.10.31, Section 2.3.
Sprinkler systems shall be designed in accordance with NFPA 13 or BS
5306, Part 2.
Sprinkler system hydraulic calculations shall be carried out using approved
software rather than by manual calculations.
Sprinkler systems shall normally be of the wet pipe type. Where the
protected area contains critical equipment and water damage from
sprinkler nozzle leakage would have major consequences, consideration
may be given to the installation of a pre action system, typically consisting
of dry pipe, requiring confirmation of fire from another source before the
valve is opened.
All system sprinkler valves and nozzles shall be approved by the Loss
Prevention Council (LPC), Underwriters Laboratories (UL) or Factory Mutual
(FM).
Sprinkler system inspection and testing shall be in accordance with NFPA
25 or BS 5306, Part 2.
5.2.2
in
accordance
with
DEP
REVISION 2.0
Page 36
HSE SPECIFICATION
Foam Systems
General
Foam systems consist of 3 basic parts:
(i)
Foam concentrate - the liquid used to foam
(ii)
Foam concentrate proportioning system - where the foam
concentrate is
mixed, at a specific proportion, with water to make foam solution.
(iii)
Foam maker (foam generator, foam application device) where air is
mixed with foam solution to make foam.
Foam makers can be further subdivided into aspirating types which use a
venturi nozzle system to draw air into the foam solution and non-aspirating
devices which rely on impinging jets of foam solution or turbulence as the
foam solution leaves the nozzle to generate bubbles of foam.
In any system, it is important to ensure that the right combination of foam
concentrate, proportioning system and foam generating devices are
selected for the particular application. The following sections deal with
specific requirements for these components for PDO facilities.
Reference shall be made to the following standards for relevant aspects of
foam system design and foam concentrate specification:
DEP 80.47.10.31 - Gen., June 1992, Section 2.4
DEP 80.47.10.10 - Gen., March 1991, Section 2.1
DEP 80.47.10.33 - Gen., Fire Fighting Vehicles and Fire Stations,
June1993
NFPA 11 - Standard for Low Expansion Systems
NFPA 16 - Deluge Foam - Water Sprinkler and Foam Water Spray
Systems, 1995
ISO 7203 - 1 Fire Extinguishing Media, Foam Concentrates, 1995
UL 162, Seventh Edition - Foam Equipment and Liquid
Concentrates, 1994
For airport applications, reference shall be made to ICAO, CAP 168 Licensing of Aerodromes, 1990.
5.3.2
SP-1075
Foam Concentrate
Wherever possible, the number of different foam concentrates on site shall
be limited to one. If this is not possible, measures shall be in place to
minimise the possibility of mixing the different types.
REVISION 2.0
Page 37
HSE SPECIFICATION
(i.e. to be used at 3%
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 38
HSE SPECIFICATION
measured:
(ii)
5.3.3
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 39
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 40
HSE SPECIFICATION
Fires
Proportioners for One Shot Foam Systems for Floating Roof Tank Rimseal
Proportioners for one-shot foam systems for floating roof tank rimseal fires
are considered to be an integral part of a package unit (see previous
section).
Testing of Proportioning Equipment
On an annual basis all proportioning systems and equipment shall be
tested under credible operational flow conditions to check that the
percentage of foam concentrate being proportioned is within the range 33.6%.
At 6 monthly intervals, foam concentrate tanks shall be inspected for signs
of sediment.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 41
HSE SPECIFICATION
5.3.4
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 42
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 43
HSE SPECIFICATION
The foam pourer assembly shall be designed such that a full flow foam
discharge test can be carried out without breaking the vapour seal and
without discharging foam into the tank.
A separate foam solution riser shall feed every foam pourer assembly.
Every foam pourer assembly shall be clearly marked with operating
pressure and flow rate.
Foam solution system pipework shall incorporate valves such that
individual risers to foam pourer assemblies can be isolated in the event of
damage to an assembly. The valves shall be located such that radiant heat
levels as predicted by FRED, do not exceed 5 kW/m2 under credible fire
scenarios (nb. full surface fires in internal floating roof tanks are not
generally considered credible scenarios - fires burn at the vents only).
The foam solution pipework shall be provided with pressure gauges at
convenient locations to check operating pressures. The minimum operating
pressure required shall be clearly identified at the pressure gauge.
The system shall be fully fixed for FERM strategy 3 & 4 facilities. They can
be supplemented by semi-fixed. In the case of semi-fixed systems the
inlets shall be positioned such that the radiation level limits given for
proportioning systems for fixed foam systems are met.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 44
HSE SPECIFICATION
In semi-fixed systems, the foam solution inlets shall be clearly marked with
their purpose, the tank number to which they relate, the minimum
operating pressure and flow rate.
All foam systems shall be discharge tested on an annual basis. The tests
shall include proportioning accuracy, foam expansion and drainage time.
Results shall be compared with system specification and manufacturers'
data.
Extended Discharge Foam Systems for Protection of Rimseal Areas on
Floating Roof Tanks
Reference should be made to DEP 80.47.10.31, General, Paragraph 2.4.1.3.
In this case, the term extended discharge refers to a system having a
discharge time in accordance with a recognised standard such as NFPA 11
(i.e. it is not a one shot system providing a short duration application of
foam as provided in the following section).
The extended discharge system shall be considered as the primary
protection system even when a one shot system is also in place. Thus a
one shot system is not considered to be an alternative to the extended
discharge system.
The system shall comply with the requirements of NFPA 11 in terms of
foam solution application rate, run time and number of foam application
points.
The systems shall not be automatically actuated from a detection system.
The system shall be designed such that it can be actuated manually, either
locally or remotely, within 10 minutes of a confirmed fire. If this cannot be
achieved, a one-shot foam system shall also be provided as detailed in the
following section.
For new facilities, the system application devices shall be of the top pourer
type because it allows easy inspection and testing. The system consists of
a number of foam generators and pourers mounted around the top of the
tank fed with foam solution from the proportioning unit. Each pourer
assembly shall be provided with a foam generator (i.e. a single foam
generator feeding several pourers shall not be permitted).
The alternative of a "Coflexip" system, consisting of a number of foam
generators mounted on the roof fed from an array of pipework that
includes a flexible pipe internal to the tank, may be maintained if already
installed on existing plant.
The primary systems shall be fully fixed but may be supplemented by
semi-fixed systems when there is ready access to a professional fire
brigade. When semi-fixed systems are installed, the system inlets shall be
outside the bund and clearly marked with their purpose, the tank to which
they relate and minimum operating pressure and flow rate.
All foam generators shall be clearly marked with their minimum operating
pressure and the flow rate at that pressure.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 45
HSE SPECIFICATION
A foam dam shall be installed on the tank to contain the foam over the
seal area. This dam shall be designed and provided with drain holes in
accordance with NFPA 11. The fitting of the foam dam to the roof shall be
such that leakage of foam or foam solution cannot occur except at the
designated drainage points (i.e. there will be a dam tank roof seal or
continuous weld except at drainage points).
Hydrant outlets fed with foam solution shall be provided at the top of the
tank at wind girder level to allow use of foam hand lines to supplement the
fixed system. The maximum distance between foam solution hydrants
shall be 60m around the walkway.
A pressure gauge shall be provided on the foam system pipework along
with clear identification of the minimum operating pressure at this point.
A cabinet including 2 x 20m x 65mm hoses and a 450 lpm foam nozzle
shall be provided at each hydrant outlet on the walkway.
Foam application devices shall be of the aspirating type.
Drain facilities shall be provided in the system to allow the complete
system to be drained after operation.
Foam application devices shall be designed or provided with screens so as
to minimise the possibility of blockage from external sources such as birds
nesting.
Foam pourers shall be designed and mounted on the tank shell so that
foam is directed to flow down the inside wall of the tank without disruption
from the tank structure or fittings.
All foam systems shall be discharge tested on an annual basis. The tests
shall include proportioning accuracy (see 4.6.3.6), foam expansion and
drainage time. Results shall be compared with system specification and
manufacturers' data.
One Shot Foam Systems for Floating Roof Tank Rimseals
A one-shot foam system for floating roof rimseals is a self contained
detection and protection system intended to provide a fast response to
rimseal fires by early detection and automatic discharge of foam into the
rimseal area. It must be emphasised that one-shot systems are regarded
as a first strike system that should detect and extinguish a rimseal fire
before it spreads significantly around the tank circumference. They should
not be regarded as an alternative to the extended discharge system
described in the previous section, which should be regarded as the primary
protection method.
One shot systems shall be a totally integrated package comprising linear
heat detection, alarm/control facilities, foam concentrate storage, water
storage (or premix storage - see below), foam solution discharge pipework
and discharge nozzles.
The detector system shall comprise a continuous heat detector mounted
around the entire circumference of the tank at a distance of 50mm
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 46
HSE SPECIFICATION
maximum from the top of the seal assembly. Each foam solution module
shall have its own dedicated detector in the segment it protects.
The heat detector shall be either of the fusible plastic tube type (see DEP
32.30.20.11 - General, November 1995, Paragraph 3.9.4.2) or digital
electrical cable type. Frangible bulbs mounted on a ring of pressurised
pipework shall not be acceptable.
On detection of the fire, a dedicated alarm will sound in a permanently
manned location and at the tank area. Visual alarms shall be clearly
identified with the number of the tank to which they refer (all detectors
from individual modules on a tank can be connected to a common alarm).
All electrical components shall be suitable for the classification of the area
in which they operate, recognising that the roof area should be regarded
as Zone 1.
Foam solution application rate shall be 20 lpm/m 2 around the seal area and
shall be discharged for a minimum period of 30 seconds.
Foam application nozzles shall be positioned such that the areas of the
rimseal affected are blanketed with foam within a period of 15 seconds
from the system actuation.
Aspirated foam nozzles are preferred in order to provide a more effective
blanket than non-aspirating nozzles.
The circumference of the tank shall be split into segments of
approximately 40m. The foam application nozzles in each segment shall
be fed with foam solution from a dedicated supply module. The discharge
pipework and detector for neighbouring modules shall overlap by at least
one nozzle spacing distance.
Foam solution discharge pipework shall be stainless steel or other material
that reduces maintenance requirements on the tank roof.
The foam solution shall be supplied from modules which contain either
premix (i.e. foam concentrate and water already mixed) in a pressure
vessel or a separate foam concentrate and water storage.
On actuation of the detector, automatic discharge of the relevant tank
segment module shall automatically occur by pressurisation of the unit.
The pressurisation cylinder shall be external to the premix (or water)
vessel for easy inspection and maintenance.
A sunshade to prevent direct exposure to sunlight shall protect each
storage module.
In cases where the foam concentrate and water are stored in separate
vessels, the proportioner shall be of a type that can still function correctly
with 3 nozzles blocked.
All foam systems shall be discharge tested on an annual basis. The tests
shall include proportioning accuracy, foam expansion and drainage time.
Results shall be compared with system specification and manufacturers'
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 47
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 48
HSE SPECIFICATION
5.3.5
5.3.6
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 49
HSE SPECIFICATION
The number of units shall be based on the requirements of any tanks that
are not protected by a fixed or semi-fixed system. In the event that all
tanks are provided with a system, a single unit shall be provided.
Each foam monitor shall have a throughput of at least 2500 lpm at 7 barg
inlet pressure. Monitors shall be provided with a self-inducing proportioning
capability but in general shall actually be operated from a specialist
vehicle proportioning system.
5.4
5.5
5.6
Portable Extinguishers
5.6.1
General
Portable extinguishers shall be suitable for the type of fuel involved in
accordance with BS EN 2. There are four classes of fire, namely Class A
involving solid materials, Class B involving liquids, Class C involving gases
and Class D involving metals.
5.6.2
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 50
installed
and
maintained
in
HSE SPECIFICATION
General
The table in Appendix D gives typical alarm and executive action
requirements for the different types of detection and facilities. This table
provides only an overview and the engineer shall fully review the
requirements of this specification to define specifics for any piece of
equipment.
6.2
Gas Turbines
The required shut down logic associated with turbine hoods is dictated by
the sequence of a limited number of possible events:
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 51
HSE SPECIFICATION
FIGURE 6.2
REVISION 2.0
Page 52
Disable Trip from Heat Switches (if total flood system installed)
Trip Turbine
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Notes:
1.
Alert and danger are defined in section 4.2
2.
HL refers to high level
SP-1075
EFFECT
CAUSE
Gas
Detection
X
X
HSE SPECIFICATION
7.0Abbreviations
SP-1075
AFFF
AFP
API
BPD
BS
British Standard
CBA
CFDH
CSN
DEP
EN
Europaische Norm
EP
Engineering Practice
ESD
Emergency Shutdown
ESDV
FES
FERM
FFFP
FM
FQB
FRED
FWS
GRP
HSE
ISO
ICAO
IPF
IR
Infra Red (the frequency of light used for fire detection and gas detection)
LEL
LFL
LNG
LPC
LPG
MAC
NDT
NFPA
REVISION 2.0
Page 53
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
PDO
PLC
ppm
PV
QRA
SIEP
SSV
SCSSV
UEL
UFL
UL
UV
VESDA
REVISION 2.0
Page 54
HSE SPECIFICATION
8.0References
1. Report No. HSE/97/07 (1997) Fire and Explosion Risk Management (FERM)
Summary Report. Petroleum Development Oman
2. Report No. EWE-28107.1 (1996) Halon Phase-out Studies, Quantified Risk
Assessment & Cost-benefit Analysis. Electrowatt Engineering
3. Report No. EWE-63273.1/1 (1997) Quantified Risk Assessment for Shipping
Pumps and Cone roofed Tanks. Electrowatt Engineering
4. Fire Protection Study Report. Resource Protection International
5. Review of Emergency Services at PDO Airfields, TSE/R/01, 1995
6. FERM Facility Plan Guideline, GU230, 2002.
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
Page 55
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
ERD 00-01
ERD 00-02
ERD 08-04
ERD 08-11
ERD 09-02
ERD 10-04
ERD 17-02
ERD 30-03
ERD 38-12
ERD 48-01
REVISION 2.0
Title
PDO Guide to Technical Standards and
Procedures
Technical Authorities System
Safety Aspects of Plant Design for
Sour Service
Isolation Process Equipment
Page 56
Referred to
in Section
General
2.4.2
4.4.1
3.2.3
3.2.3
3.2.3
3.2.3
3.2.3
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
4.3.6
3.4.1
4.3.3
5.1.1
5.1.2
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
Gen
Gen
Gen
DEP 30.48.30.31-
Gen
Gen
Gen
Gen
Gen
Gen
Gen
DEP 32.30.20.11-
Title
DEP 34.17.10.31-
DEP 80.47.10.10-
DEP 80.47.10.30-
Gen
DEP 80.47.10.31-
Gen
DEP 80.47.10.32-
Gen
DEP 80.47.10.33-
EP95-0352
EP92-1820
REVISION 2.0
Page 57
Referred to
in Section
5.1.1
5.1.3
5.1.3
5.3.4
4.1
4.1
3.2.3
3.4.5
5.3.1
5.5
3.2.4
3.2.4
5.1.5
5.1.1
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3.1
5.3.4
5.3.4
3.5.2
5.1.4
5.1.5
5.3.1
5.3.3
3.2.3
2.5.1
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
International
Standards
BS 336
BS 476 Parts
BS 5306 Part
BS 5423
BS 5839 Part
BS 5839 Part
NFPA 10
NFPA 11
NFPA 13
NFPA 15
NFPA 16
NFPA 20
BS 476 Part
BS 5306 Part
BS EN 2
Title
British Standards:1989: Specification for Fire
Hose Couplings and Ancillary Equipment. BSI
Publication
British Standards:1984: Non-combustible test
for materials. BSI Publication
British Standards:1993: Method for
classification of the surface spread of flame
of products. BSI Publication
British Standards:1990: Specification for
Sprinkler Systems
British Standards:1985: Code of Practice for
the Selection, Installation and Maintenance of
Portable Extinguishers. BSI Publication
British Standards:1995: Specification of
Portable Fire Extinguishers. BSI Publication
British Standards:1988: Fire Detection and
Alarm Systems for Buildings. Part 1 Code of
Practice for System Design, Installation and
Servicing. BSI Publication
British Standards:1983: Specification for
Manual Alarm Call Points. BSI Publication
British Standards:1992: Classification of Fires
(replaces Code of Practice for Classification of
Fires:1972) BSI Publication
National Fire Codes: Portable Fire
extinguishers. Vol.1. National Fire Protection
Association.
National Fire Codes: Standard for LowExpansion Foam. Vol.1. National Fire
Protection Association.
REVISION 2.0
Page 58
Referred to
in Section
5.1.4
3.4.4
3.4.4
5.2.1
5.6.2
5.6.2
4.3.7
3.4.1
4.4.1
5.6.1
5.6.2
5.3.1
5.3.3
5.3.3
5.3.4
5.3.4
5.3.4
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3.1
5.3.5
5.1.3
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
NFPA 22
NFPA 750
NFPA 2001
ICAO-9137 Part
1
ICAO-9137 Part
7
ISO 7203-1
UL 162
REVISION 2.0
Page 59
5.1.2
5.4
5.5
3.5.1
3.5.1
5.3.1
5.3.2
5.3.1
5.3.2
HSE SPECIFICATION
No Impact
No Effect
Slight injury
Slight Damage
Slight Effect
Slight Impact
Slight Effect
Minor injury
Minor Damage
Minor
Effect
Limited Effect
Minor Local
Effect
Major injury
Local Damage
Localised
Effect
Considerable
Impact
Major Local
Effect
Single
Fatality
Major Damage
Major Effect
National
Impact
Massive
Effect
International
Impact
Total
Extended
Effect
Multiple
Fatality
Extensive
Damage
Massive Effect
Incident:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SP-1075
incide n t
h ap p e n s seve ra l
tim e s a ye a r in
S IE P
in cid e n t
h a p p en s
seve ra l tim e s a
ye ar a t lo ca tion
No Effect
incide n t h a s
o ccurre d in
S IE P
No Damaage
in cid e n t h a s
o ccurre d in E & P
in d u stry
No injury
n o t h ea rd o f bu t
cou ld o ccu r in
E & P in d u stry
P rod u ction
A sse ts
P eo p le
R e pu tatio n
R a tin gs
E n viro n m e n t
Consequence
1
2
4
2
Strategy:
Small Incidents
Pump Seals
Compressors
Turbine Enclosures
Pressure Vessels
6.
7.
8.
9.
REVISION 2.0
Page 60
Strategy 1
Strategy 3
Strategy 1/2
Strategy 4
Strategy 2
Strategy 3/4
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
AREA
Lekhwair
Yibal
Fahud
Qarn Alam
Rima PS
Sayyala PS
Nimr PS
Marmul
Anzauz
Suwaihat
Zauliyah
Ghubar
Page 61
HSE SPECIFICATION
Gathering Stations
Category A: Typical facilities include:
Manifolds
Separators
Pumps
Small cone roof tanks
Substation
Control Room
First aid fire protection is only to be provided at Category A stations (strategy level
1).
Category B: Typical facilities include those on Category A stations but also
compressors and turbine enclosures.
Specific hazard fire protection is to be provided at Category B stations without a
fire water network (strategy level 2).
CATEGORY
B
A
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
B
A
B
B
SP-1075
REVISION 2.0
AREA
Al Huwaisah
Lekhwair B
Yibal B
Yibal C
Yibal D
Fahud B
Fahud C
Fahud D
Fahud E
Fahud F
Natih
Qarn Alam
Barik
Burhaan
Ghaba North
Qarat Al Milh
Saih Rawl
Bahja
Page 62
CATEGORY
B
A
A
B
A
B
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
B
A
By passed
AREA
Marmul A
Marmul B
Marmul C
Marmul D
Marmul E
Marmul G
Qaharir
Rahab
Thamoud
Thuleilat
Birba
Nimr C
Nimr B
Nimr A
Amal
Saih Nihayda
Sadad
Hasirah
HSE SPECIFICATION
Fire
Type of
Detecto
r
Heat
Flame
Smoke
Gas
Comb
Gas
Equipment Type
SP-1075
REVISION 1.0
Page 63
Facility Type
Gath
Station
X
Prod
Station
X
Booster
Station
X
Power
Station
N/A
MAF
GGP
X
X
N/A
X
N/A
X
X
X
X
X
N/A
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
N/A
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
Alarm & ESD
Alarm & ESD
X
X
X
X
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
X
N/A
X
X
X
X
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
HSE SPECIFICATION
SP-1075
REVISION 1.0
Page 64
N/A
HSE SPECIFICATION
Heat
Alarm/Action
Gath
Station
X
Note 2
X
Prod
Station
X
Note 2
X
Booster
Station
X
Note 2
X
Power
Station
X
Note 2
X
MAF
GGP
X
Note 2
X
X
Note 2
X
Area sirens/bells
ESD associated equipment
Blowdown associated
equipment (Note 4)
Station ESD
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note 1
X
X
X
X
X
Note 1
X
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
Note 1
X
X
Note 1
X
Flame
SP-1075
Facility Type
REVISION 1.0
Page 65
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
HSE SPECIFICATION
Smoke
Alarm to SCADA
Alarm to fire brigade
GFS panel alarm
Mimic panel alarm
Area sirens/bells
Isolate associated non
essential power supplies
Alarm to SCADA
Alarm to fire brigade
Associated AC trip
SP-1075
REVISION 1.0
Page 66
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
HSE SPECIFICATION
Alarm/Action
Comb Gas
Danger
SP-1075
Facility Type
Gath
Station
X
Note 2
X
Prod
Station
X
Note 2
X
Booster
Station
X
Note 2
X
Power
Station
X
Note 2
X
MAF
GGP
X
Note 2
X
X
Note 2
X
X
Note 2
X
Note 2
X
Note 2
X
Note 2
X
Note 2
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note 1
X
X
Note 1
X
REVISION 1.0
Page 67
HSE SPECIFICATION
Toxic (H2S)
Manual call
Point
AFP activated
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X Note 2
X Note 2
X Note 2
X Note 2
X Note 2
X Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
Note 1
X
Note 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note 1
X
Note 2
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
X
Note 2
X
X
SP-1075
X
Note 2
X
X
REVISION 1.0
Page 68
HSE SPECIFICATION
-4
x 486 =)
1
2
x 63000
$ 22964
2
$ 45927
20
$ 918540
0.490
$ 450085
The risk reduction by installing heat detection and base foam injection is
provided on the risk histogram (Figure 3.2.3), and works out as 64% (ie,
100-36). Therefore, 0.64 x 450085 = US$288054 can be spent installing
SP-1075
REVISION 1.0
Page 69
HSE SPECIFICATION
heat detection and base foam. If the cost of installing the fire protection is
less that US$288054, then installation is justified.
SP-1075
REVISION 1.0
Page 70
HSE SPECIFICATION
Shipping Pumps
Suppose we are installing 3 additional centrifugal shipping pumps at Yibal
A and wish to establish the levels of fire protection that can be justified.
Assuming that the 3 pumps have a combined capacity of 23000 BPD, and
using the pro-forma on page 18 of this Specification:
BASE CASE COST OF DAMAGE CALCULATION PRO-FORMA
System Constant
0.12402
based on frequency of damage x days lost for 3 pumps:
-4
(3.18x10 x 130 x 3 = )
Pump Type for centrifugal/axial or screw pumps use x 1
x1
for reciprocating pumps use x 10
Number of Pumps in Set for 2 pumps use x 0.6
x1
for 3 pumps use x 1.0
for 4 pumps use x 1.46
for 5 pumps use x 2.0
1
2
Cost of Deferred Oil = 2US$ per barrel
Net Oil Production for Pump Set in BPD
x 23000
= Base Case Annual Cost of Damage per Pump Set =
$ 5705
x Design Life of the Pump Set
20
= Undiscounted Design Cost of Damage for Pump
$ 114098
Set =
Discount Factor takes into account the design life of the
fire protection facilities together with the average discount
rate. The undiscounted value should be multiplied by the
value at discount rate taken from the following table below.
Value at Discount Rate
Years
5%
8%
10%
10
0.772
0.671
0.617
20
0.621
0.490
0.426
25
0.564
0.427
0.362
30
0.512
0.376
0.313
0.490
Base Case PV of Cost of Damage for Installation
$ 55908
SP-1075
REVISION 1.0
Page 71