Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Force Method PDF
Force Method PDF
Deformation
Structural Analysis
By
R. C. Hibbeler
Theory of Structures-II
M Shahid Mehmood
Department of Civil Engineering
Swedish College of Engineering and Technology, Wah Cantt
FRAMES
2
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 6
Determine the support reactions on the frame shown. EI
is constant.
8 kN/m
5m
4m
Actual Frame
B
3
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
8 kN/m
5m
4m
Actual Frame
B
Solution
Principle of Superposition
We will choose the horizontal reaction at support B as
the redundant.
The pin at B is replaced by the roller, since a roller will
not constraint B in the horizontal direction.
8 kN/m
A
Primary Structure B
B 5
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Principle of Superposition
Primary Structure
8 kN/m
A = + B
5m A
4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB6
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Compatibility Equation
0 B Bx f BB
Primary Structure
8 kN/m
A = + B
5m A
4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 B Bx f BB
8
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
For B we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit load at B
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN
x1
M 1 20 x1 4 x12 x1
m1 0.8 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN
M2 0 m2 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN
20 kN 0.8 kN
9
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
B
Mm L
dx 1
2
1 1
5 20 x 4 x 0.8 x dx
1
4 01x dx
2 2
dx
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
166.7 166.7
0
EI EI
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN
M 1 20 x1 4 2x1 m1 0.8 x1
x1 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN
M2 0 m2 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN
10
20 kN 0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
For fBB we require application of real unit load acting at B
and a virtual unit load acting at B
A
1 kN
x1
m1 0.8 x1
0.8 kN
m2 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
0.8 kN
11
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
f BB
mmL
dx
0.8 x1 dx15
01x2 dx2
2
dx
4
2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
26.7 21.3 48.0
EI EI EI
A
1 kN
x1
m1 0.8 x1
0.8 kN
m2 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
12
0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 B Bx f BB (1)
166.7 48.0
0 Bx
EI EI
Bx 3.47 kN ANS
13
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Equilibrium Condition
Showing Bx on the free body diagram of the frame in the
correct direction, and applying the equations of
equilibrium, we have
40 kN
A
Ax
2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m
B
3.47 kN
By 14
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
40 kN
Solution
A
Equilibrium Condition Ax
2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m
B
3.47 kN
Fx 0;
By
Ax 3.47 0 Ax 3.47 kN
Fy 0; Ay 40 22.8 0 Ay 17.2 kN
15
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 7
Determine the moment at fixed support A for the frame
shown. EI is constant.
B
ft
b/
0l
4 ft
10
t
5f
C
8 ft
A
3 ft
Actual Frame 16
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
B
ft
b/
0l
4 ft
10
t
5f
C
8 ft Actual Frame
A
3 ft
Solution
Principle of Superposition
B
ft
b/
0l
choosing as the redundant.
10
C
The capacity of the frame to
support a moment at A is Actual Frame
removed and therefore a pin is
used at A for support. A
18
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation 0 A M A AA (1)
Reference to point A
B B B
ft
ft
b/
b/
0l
0l
10
10
C = C + C
A MAAA
A A
A MA
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 A M A AA (1)
20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
Reference to point A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb
M 1 29.17 x1 m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 21
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
For A we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit couple moment at A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb
M 1 29.17 x1 m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 22
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
A
MmL
dx
8 29.17 x 1 0.0833 x dx
1 1 1
2
5 296.7 x 50 x 0.0067 x dx
2
2 2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
518.5 303.2 821.8
EI EI EI
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb
M 1 29.17 x1 m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 23
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
For AA we require application of real unit couple
moment and a virtual unit couple moment at A
0.05 lb
0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 0.0667 x2
m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 24
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 1 0.0833 x dx 5 0.0067 x dx
2 2
m m
AA
L
dx 1 1
2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
3.85 0.185 4.04
EI EI EI
0.05 lb
0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 0.0667 x2
m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 25
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Substituting these results into
Eq. (1), and solving yields
ft
b/
0l
10
821.8 4.04
0 M A
EI EI C
M A 204 lb. ft ANS
26
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 8
Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending
moment diagrams. EI is constant.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
15 ft
A D
Actual Frame
30 ft
27
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
15 ft
A D
Actual Frame
30 ft
Degree of indeterminacy = 2
28
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
We will choose the horizontal reaction Dx and vertical
reaction Dy at point D as the redundants.
Actual Frame
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
A D Dx
29
Dy
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is obtained by removing the hinged
support at point D.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
A D
Primary Structure
30
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
A D
Dy
Dx
31
Primary Structure
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
B C
A D Dx
DyDx=DxfDyDx
DxDx=DxfDxDx
Redundant Dx applied 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
DyDy=DyfDyDy
D
A
Dy
DxDy=DyfDxDy
Redundant Dy applied 33
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 Dx DxDx
'
DxDy
'
Dx Dx f DxDx D y f DxDy (1)
0 Dy DyDx
'
DyDy
'
Dy Dx f DyDx D y f DyDy (2)
34
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation M2
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
x2
M1 M3
x1 x3
10 k D
A 1050 k-ft
60 k
Member Origin Limits M (k-ft)
AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1
CB C 0-30 -x22
DC D 0-15 0 35
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation mDx2
B C
x2
mDx1 mDx3
x1 x3
1k 1k
A D
Solution
Compatibility Equation mDy2
B C
x2
mDy1 mDy3
x1 x3
30 k-ft
A D
1k 1k
Solution
Dx
L MmDx
dx
15 1050 10 x x
1 1
dx1
30 x 15
2
2
dx 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
15 0 x
3
dx3
0 EI
241875
Dx 106875 135000 0 k ft 3
EI
Dy
L MmDy
dx
15 1050 10 x1 30 dx 30 x x dx
2
1 0
2 2
2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
641250
Dy 438750 202500 0 k ft 3
EI 38
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
15 x 30 15 15 x
2 2 2
L mDx mDx
f DxDx dx 1
dx1 dx 2 3
dx3
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
9000 3
f DxDx ft
EI
f DyDy
L mDy mDy
dx
15 30 2 dx
30 x2 2 dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
22500 3
f DyDy ft
EI
39
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
f DxDy f DyDx
L mDx mDy 15
dx
x1 30 dx
30 15x2 dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
10125 3
f DxDy f DyDx ft
EI
40
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
241875
Dx k ft 3
EI
641250
Dy k ft 3
EI
9000 3
f DxDx ft
EI
22500 3
f DyDy ft
EI
10125 3
f DxDy f DyDx ft
EI
41
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Dx 10.503 k
D y 33.226 k
42
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Applying equations of equilibrium, we have the other
support reactions as
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
0.503 k A 10.503 k
53.22 k-ft D
26.774 k 33.226 k
43
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Shear diagram
26.774
C
B
10.503
-33.226
-0.503
A D
44
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Moment diagram
118.447
C
B
60.765 157.545
60.765
157.545
A 53.22 D
45
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
TRUSSES
46
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 9
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.
AE is same for all members.
400 lb
D C
6 ft
A B
8 ft
Actual Truss
47
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.
400 lb
b + r = 2j
D C
6 + 3 = 2(4)
9>8 6 ft
9 8 = 1st degree
A B
8 ft
Actual Truss
48
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
The force in member AC is to be determined, so member
AC is chosen as redundant.
This requires cutting this member, so that it cannot
sustain a force, making the truss S.D. and stable.
400 lb
D C
6 ft
Actual Truss
A B
49
8 ft
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution 400 lb
D C
Actual Truss
A B
=
400 lb
D C D FAC C
AC
FAC
+
FACfACAC
A B A 50 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
With reference to member AC, we require the relative
displacement AC, which occurs at the ends of cut
member AC due to the 400-lb load, plus the relative
displacement FACfACAC caused by the redundant force
acting alone, be equal to zero, that is
0 AC FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C
AC
FAC
FACfACAC
A B A 51 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
Here the flexibility coefficient fACAC represents the
relative displacement of the cut ends of member AC
caused by a real unit load acting at the cut ends of
member AC.
0 AC FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C
AC
FAC
FACfACAC
A B A 52 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
This term, fACAC, and AC will be computed using the
method of virtual work.
0 AC FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C
AC
FAC
+
FACfACAC
A B A 53 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
For AC we require application of the real load of 400 lb,
and a virtual unit force acting at the cut ends of member
AC.
300 lb 300 lb
54
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
nNL
AC
AE
0.8400 8 0.6 0 6 0.6 300 6 1 500 10 10 10
2
AE AE AE AE AE
11200
AE
Solution
Compatibility Equation
For fACAC we require application of the real unit forces
acting on the cut ends of member AC, and virtual unit
forces acting on the cut ends of member AC
-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B
56
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
n2 L
f ACAC
AE
0.82 8 0.6 2 6 1210
2 2 2
AE AE AE
34.56
AE
-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B
57
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Substituting the data into Eq. (1) and solving yields
11200 34.56
0 FAC
AE AE
FAC 324 lb (T) ANS
58
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 10
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.
D C
6 ft
A B
8 ft
Actual Truss
59
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 11
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. E = 29,000 ksi
E (6 in.2) F
28 k
2) 2) (6
n. n.
6i 4i in. 2
15 ft
(4 in.2)
(4 in.2)
( ( )
A D
(6 in.2) B (6 in.2) C (6 in.2)
25 k 25 k
3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
Actual Truss
60
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.
b + r = 2j
9 + 4 = 2(6)
13 > 12
13 12 = 1st degree
E (6 in.2) F
28 k
2) 2) (6
n. n.
6i 4i in. 2
15 ft
(4 in.2)
(4 in.2)
( ( )
A D
Solution E F
28 k Actual Truss
A D Dx
Ax
B C
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy
E F
Solution 28 k Primary
Structure
D
Ax A
B C D
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy
E 24 F
28 k
30 .67 53
.33
11
18 25
D
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D
25 k 25 k 32 k 63
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
D is horizontal deflection at point D of primary
structure due to external loading.
E 24 F
28 k
Primary
Structure
30 .67 53
.33
11
18 25
D
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D
25 k 25 k 32 k 64
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
E F
Solution Redundant
Dx is applied
A Dx
B C D
DD=DxfDD
E 0 F
0 0 0
0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
65
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
E F
Solution Redundant
Dx is applied
A Dx
B C D
DD=DxfDD
66
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
E 0 F
0 0 0
0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
67
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 D Dx f DD
28 k
Dx
Ax
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy
28 k Primary Redundant
Structure Dx is applied
D + Dx
Ax
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy DD=DxfDD
68
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
nNL
D
AE
where
Solution
Solution
TABLE
Member L (in.) A (in.2) N (k) n (k) nNL/A n2L/A F=N+nDx
(k/in.)
AB 240 6 52 1 2,080 40 6.22
BC 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
CD 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
EF 240 6 -24 0 0 0 -24
BF 180 4 18 0 0 0 18
CF 180 4 25 0 0 0 25
AE 300 6 -30 0 0 0 -30
BF 300 4 11.67 0 0 0 11.67
DF 300 6 -53.33 0 0 0 -53.33
nNL 5,493.6 k/in.
D 5,493.6 120
AE E
2
n L 120 (1/in.)
f DD
AE E 71
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
nNL
D
AE
52 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12
D
6E 6E 6E
2080 1706.8 1706.8
D
6E 6E 6E
5493.6 k/in
D
E
72
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
n2 L
f DD
AE
1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12
f DD
6E 6E 6E
120 (1/in)
f DD
E
Now put these results into Equation (1)
5493.6 120
Dx 0 Dx 45.78 k
E E
73
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
F N nDx
FAB 52 1 45.78 6.22 (T)
FBC 42.67 1 45.78 3.11 (C)
FCD 3.11 (C)
Equation of Equilibrium
28 k
F 0
Ax 28 45.78 0 Ax=17.78 Dx=45.78
Ay 18 k
D y 32 k 74
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
E F
28 k Primary
Structure
Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A B C D
25 k 25 k
Ay =18 Dy = 32
E 24 F
28 k
30 .67 53
.33
11
18 25
Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A 6.22 B 3.11 C 3.11
D
25 k 25 k 75
Ay =18 Dy = 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 12
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. EA = constant. E = 200
GPa., A = 4000 mm2
F G H
70 kN
10m
A
B C D E
80 kN 80 kN
Actual Truss
76
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
Degree of Indeterminacy = 2
b+r>2j
14 + 4 > 2 8
18 > 16 F G H
70 kN
Ax A E
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
Actual Truss 77
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
F G H
70 kN
Ax A E
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
Actual Truss 78
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
F G H
70 kN
Ax A E
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Ey
Determinate Truss 79
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
F G H
70 kN
BG
A E
B C D
D
80 kN 80 kN
80
Primary structure subjected to actual loading
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
A E
B C DD=DyfDD D
Dy
81
Redundant Dy applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
Principle of Superposition
FBG FBG
A E
B C D,BG=FBGfD,BG D
82
Redundant FBG applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Actual Truss
A E
Ax
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
BG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
D
80 kN 80 kN
+
BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H
Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 83
D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H
Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C DD=DyfDD D
Dy
F G H
Unit load in the direction
fBG,D
of Dy applied
A E
B C fDD D
84
1
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
Redundant FBG applied
FBG FBG
A E
B C D,BG=FBGfD,BG D
fBG,BG
F G H
Unit force in member
1 BG applied
1
A E
B C fD,BG D
85
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Compatibility Actual Truss
A
Equation Ax
B C D
E
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
BG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
D
80 kN 80 kN
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG +
BG,D=DyfBG,D
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG F G H
Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 86
D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Compatibility Equation
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG
fBG,D = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit load at D
fBG,BG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit force
Compatibility Equation
We will use the method of virtual work to find the
deflections
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG
NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D f DD f D, BG
AE AE AE
88
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Compatibility Equation
NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D f DD f D, BG
AE AE AE
nBG nBG L nBG nD L
BG
NnBG L f BG f BG, D
AE AE AE
Solution
F 85 G 85 H
70 kN
3.5
.6 73 36 0 2 10
9.6
11
6 9.6 02
80 0 10 0
A E
70
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5
80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5
90
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
F 0.5 G 0.5 H
0.3
54 54 4 1.0
0.3 0.3
5 61
0 0 1
A E
0
0.25 B 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75
1 kN
0.25 0.75
91
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
F 0.707 G 0 H
1 1
1
0 0
0.707
0.707
0
0
A E
0
0 B 0.707 C 0 D 0
0 0
92
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
CG 10 0 0 -0.707 0 0 0 5 0 -24.109
DH 10 0 -1 0 0 0 10 0 0 -96.507
93
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Compatibility Equation
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG
4,472.642 kN .m 48.284 m
D f BG, BG
AE AE
992.819 kN .m 6.773 m
BG f BG, D f D , BG
AE AE
48.736 m
f DD
AE
By substituting these values into the above equations
94
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Compatibility Equation
D y 96.507 kN
FBG 34.1 kN
95
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
96
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F 85 G 85 H
3
7 3.5 170 kN
6.6 36 02 09
11 9.6 .60
80 0 10 0 2
70 A E
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5
80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5
+
F 0.5 G 0.5 H
0.3 1.0
54 54 5 4 61
0.3 0.3 1
0 0
0 A E
0.25 B 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75
0.25 + 1 kN
0.75
F 0.707 G 0 H
1 1
1 0
0.707
0.707
0 0
0
0 A E
0 B 0.707 C 0 D 0
0 0
=
F 60.855 G 36.747 H
3.4 70 kN
73 7.2
.51
55.891
24.109
96.507
82 65 08
.1 3.7
A 34 14 Actual Truss
Ax=70 E
128.373 104.265 5.12 5.12
B C D
Ay=58.373 80 kN 80 kN Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12
97
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Actual Truss
F 60.855
G 36.747
H
70 kN
3.4
73
55.891
5 7.2
.76
24.109
1 3 08
2.5 .1 14
A 8 34
96.507
E
Ax=70 128.373
B 104.265
C 5.12
D 5.12
80 kN 80 kN
Ay=58.373 Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12
98