You are on page 1of 98

Method of Consistent

Deformation
Structural Analysis
By
R. C. Hibbeler

Theory of Structures-II
M Shahid Mehmood
Department of Civil Engineering
Swedish College of Engineering and Technology, Wah Cantt
FRAMES

Method of consistent deformation is very useful for


solving problems involving statically indeterminate
frames for single story and unusual geometry.

Problems involving multistory frames, or with high


indeterminacy are best solved using the slope deflection
or moment distribution or the stiffness methods.

2
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 6
Determine the support reactions on the frame shown. EI
is constant.

8 kN/m

5m
4m

Actual Frame
B

3
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
8 kN/m

5m
4m

Actual Frame
B

By inspection the frame is indeterminate to the first


degree.
4
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
We will choose the horizontal reaction at support B as
the redundant.
The pin at B is replaced by the roller, since a roller will
not constraint B in the horizontal direction.
8 kN/m
A

Primary Structure B

B 5
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Principle of Superposition

Primary Structure
8 kN/m

A = + B

5m A

4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB6
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
8 kN/m
Solution
A
Compatibility Equation

0 B Bx f BB
Primary Structure
8 kN/m

A = + B

5m A

4m redundant Bx
Actual Frame applied
B
B
Bx
Bx fBB7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 B Bx f BB

The terms B and fBB will be computed using the method


of virtual work.
The frame s x coordinates and internal moments are
shown in figure.
It is important that in each case the selected coordinate
x1 or x2 be the same for both the real and virtual loadings.
Also the positive directions for M and m must be same.

8
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For B we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit load at B
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN

x1
M 1 20 x1 4 x12 x1
m1 0.8 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN

M2 0 m2 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN

20 kN 0.8 kN
9
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

B
Mm L
dx 1
2
1 1
5 20 x 4 x 0.8 x dx
1

4 01x dx
2 2
dx
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
166.7 166.7
0
EI EI
8 kN/m
A A
1 kN
M 1 20 x1 4 2x1 m1 0.8 x1
x1 x1
20 kN 0.8 kN

M2 0 m2 1x2
x2 x2
B B
1 kN
10
20 kN 0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For fBB we require application of real unit load acting at B
and a virtual unit load acting at B

A
1 kN

x1
m1 0.8 x1
0.8 kN

m2 1x2
x2
B
1 kN

0.8 kN
11
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

f BB
mmL
dx
0.8 x1 dx15

01x2 dx2
2
dx
4
2

0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
26.7 21.3 48.0

EI EI EI

A
1 kN

x1
m1 0.8 x1
0.8 kN

m2 1x2
x2
B
1 kN
12
0.8 kN
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 B Bx f BB (1)

Substituting the data in Eq. (1)

166.7 48.0
0 Bx
EI EI

Bx 3.47 kN ANS

13
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Equilibrium Condition
Showing Bx on the free body diagram of the frame in the
correct direction, and applying the equations of
equilibrium, we have
40 kN
A
Ax

2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m

B
3.47 kN
By 14
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

40 kN
Solution
A
Equilibrium Condition Ax

2.5 m 2.5 m
Ay
4m

B
3.47 kN

Fx 0;
By
Ax 3.47 0 Ax 3.47 kN

M A 0; 402.5 B y 5-3.474 0 By 22.8 kN

Fy 0; Ay 40 22.8 0 Ay 17.2 kN
15
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 7
Determine the moment at fixed support A for the frame
shown. EI is constant.
B

ft
b/
0l
4 ft

10

t
5f
C

8 ft

A
3 ft

Actual Frame 16
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
B

ft
b/
0l
4 ft

10

t
5f
C

8 ft Actual Frame

A
3 ft

By inspection the frame is indeterminate to the first


degree. 17
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
B

MA can be directly obtained by

ft
b/
0l
choosing as the redundant.

10
C
The capacity of the frame to
support a moment at A is Actual Frame
removed and therefore a pin is
used at A for support. A

18
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation 0 A M A AA (1)
Reference to point A
B B B
ft

ft
b/

b/
0l

0l
10

10
C = C + C

A MAAA
A A
A MA

actual frame primary structure Redundant MA applied


19
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation

0 A M A AA (1)

The terms A and AA will be computed using the method


of virtual work.

The frame s x coordinates and internal moments are


shown in figure.

20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
Reference to point A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb

M 2 296.7 x2 50 x22 m2 0.0667 x2

M 1 29.17 x1 m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 21
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
For A we require application of real loads and a virtual
unit couple moment at A
222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb

M 2 296.7 x2 50 x22 m2 0.0667 x2

M 1 29.17 x1 m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 22
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

A
MmL
dx
8 29.17 x 1 0.0833 x dx
1 1 1
2
5 296.7 x 50 x 0.0067 x dx
2
2 2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
518.5 303.2 821.8

EI EI EI

222.5 lb 0.05 lb
500 lb
370.8 lb
3 5 0.0833 lb
4 x2 x2
296.7 lb 0.0667 lb

M 2 296.7 x2 50 x22 m2 0.0667 x2

M 1 29.17 x1 m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1 x1
29.17 lb 0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 23
300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
For AA we require application of real unit couple
moment and a virtual unit couple moment at A
0.05 lb

0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 0.0667 x2

m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 24
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

8 1 0.0833 x dx 5 0.0067 x dx
2 2
m m
AA
L
dx 1 1
2 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
3.85 0.185 4.04

EI EI EI
0.05 lb

0.0833 lb
x2
0.0667 lb
m2 0.0667 x2

m1 1 0.0833 x1
x1
0.0833 lb
1 lb.ft
0 25
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Substituting these results into
Eq. (1), and solving yields

ft
b/
0l
10
821.8 4.04
0 M A
EI EI C
M A 204 lb. ft ANS

The negative sign indicates MA


acts in opposite direction to that A MA =204 lb.ft
shown in figure.

26
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 8
Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending
moment diagrams. EI is constant.

2 k/ft
B C
10 k

15 ft

A D
Actual Frame

30 ft
27
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
2 k/ft
B C
10 k

15 ft

A D
Actual Frame

30 ft

Degree of indeterminacy = 2

28
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
We will choose the horizontal reaction Dx and vertical
reaction Dy at point D as the redundants.

Actual Frame
2 k/ft
B C
10 k

A D Dx

29
Dy
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is obtained by removing the hinged
support at point D.

2 k/ft
B C
10 k

A D

Primary Structure
30
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.
2 k/ft
B C
10 k

A D
Dy

Dx
31
Primary Structure
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.

B C

A D Dx
DyDx=DxfDyDx
DxDx=DxfDxDx
Redundant Dx applied 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
Primary structure is subjected separately to the external
loading and redundants Dx and Dy as shown.

DyDy=DyfDyDy
D
A

Dy
DxDy=DyfDxDy
Redundant Dy applied 33
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 Dx DxDx
'
DxDy
'
Dx Dx f DxDx D y f DxDy (1)
0 Dy DyDx
'
DyDy
'
Dy Dx f DyDx D y f DyDy (2)

The equations for bending moments for the members of


the frame due to external loading and unit values of the
redundants are tabulated in the table.

By applying the virtual work method, we will find Dx, Dy,


fDxDx, fDyDx, fDxDy, fDyDy,

34
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation M2
2 k/ft
B C
10 k
x2

M1 M3

x1 x3
10 k D
A 1050 k-ft

60 k
Member Origin Limits M (k-ft)
AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1
CB C 0-30 -x22
DC D 0-15 0 35
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation mDx2
B C

x2

mDx1 mDx3

x1 x3
1k 1k
A D

Member Origin Limits M (k-ft) mDx (k-ft/k)


AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1 -x1
CB C 0-30 -x22 -15
DC D 0-15 0 -x3 36
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation mDy2
B C

x2

mDy1 mDy3

x1 x3
30 k-ft
A D
1k 1k

Member Origin Limits M (k-ft) mDx (k-ft/k) mDy (k-ft/k)


AB A 0-15 -1050+10x1 -x1 30
CB C 0-30 -x22 -15 x2
DC D 0-15 0 -x3 0 37
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

Dx
L MmDx
dx
15 1050 10 x x
1 1
dx1
30 x 15
2
2
dx 2

0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
15 0 x
3
dx3
0 EI
241875
Dx 106875 135000 0 k ft 3
EI

Dy
L MmDy
dx
15 1050 10 x1 30 dx 30 x x dx
2

1 0
2 2
2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
641250
Dy 438750 202500 0 k ft 3
EI 38
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

15 x 30 15 15 x
2 2 2
L mDx mDx
f DxDx dx 1
dx1 dx 2 3
dx3
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
9000 3
f DxDx ft
EI

f DyDy
L mDy mDy
dx
15 30 2 dx
30 x2 2 dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
22500 3
f DyDy ft
EI

39
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

f DxDy f DyDx
L mDx mDy 15
dx
x1 30 dx
30 15x2 dx
1 2
0 EI 0 EI 0 EI
10125 3
f DxDy f DyDx ft
EI

40
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

241875
Dx k ft 3
EI
641250
Dy k ft 3
EI
9000 3
f DxDx ft
EI
22500 3
f DyDy ft
EI
10125 3
f DxDy f DyDx ft
EI
41
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

Now put these values in the Equations (1) and (2)

0 241875 9000 Dx 10125 D y (1)

0 641250 10125 Dx 22500 D y (2)

By solving (1) and (2) simultaneously we get

Dx 10.503 k

D y 33.226 k
42
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Applying equations of equilibrium, we have the other
support reactions as

2 k/ft
B C
10 k

0.503 k A 10.503 k
53.22 k-ft D

26.774 k 33.226 k

43
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Shear diagram

26.774

C
B
10.503

-33.226
-0.503

A D

44
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Moment diagram

118.447

C
B
60.765 157.545
60.765
157.545

A 53.22 D

45
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

TRUSSES

The degree of indeterminacy of a truss can be find using


Equation b+r > 2j.
where
b = unknown bar forces, r = support reactions,
2j = equations of equilibrium

This method is quite suitable for analyzing trusses that


are statically indeterminate to the first or second degree.

46
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 9
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.
AE is same for all members.

400 lb
D C

6 ft

A B

8 ft
Actual Truss
47
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.

400 lb
b + r = 2j
D C
6 + 3 = 2(4)
9>8 6 ft
9 8 = 1st degree

A B

8 ft
Actual Truss
48
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition
The force in member AC is to be determined, so member
AC is chosen as redundant.
This requires cutting this member, so that it cannot
sustain a force, making the truss S.D. and stable.
400 lb
D C

6 ft
Actual Truss

A B
49
8 ft
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution 400 lb
D C

Actual Truss

A B
=
400 lb
D C D FAC C

AC
FAC
+
FACfACAC

A B A 50 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
With reference to member AC, we require the relative
displacement AC, which occurs at the ends of cut
member AC due to the 400-lb load, plus the relative
displacement FACfACAC caused by the redundant force
acting alone, be equal to zero, that is
0 AC FAC f ACAC
400 lb
D C D FAC C

AC
FAC

FACfACAC

A B A 51 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
Here the flexibility coefficient fACAC represents the
relative displacement of the cut ends of member AC
caused by a real unit load acting at the cut ends of
member AC.
0 AC FAC f ACAC

400 lb
D C D FAC C

AC
FAC

FACfACAC

A B A 52 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
This term, fACAC, and AC will be computed using the
method of virtual work.

0 AC FAC f ACAC

400 lb
D C D FAC C

AC
FAC
+
FACfACAC

A B A 53 B
Primary Structure Redundant FAC applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For AC we require application of the real load of 400 lb,
and a virtual unit force acting at the cut ends of member
AC.

+400 400 lb -0.8


D C D C
-50
0 1 lb
1 lb
0
+300 0 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1
x
400 lb
A +400 B A -0.8 B

300 lb 300 lb
54
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
nNL
AC
AE
0.8400 8 0.6 0 6 0.6 300 6 1 500 10 10 10
2
AE AE AE AE AE
11200

AE

+400 400 lb -0.8


D C D C
-50
0 1 lb
1 lb
0
+300 0 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1
x
400 lb
A +400 B A -0.8 B
55
300 lb 300 lb
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
For fACAC we require application of the real unit forces
acting on the cut ends of member AC, and virtual unit
forces acting on the cut ends of member AC

-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B

56
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
n2 L
f ACAC
AE
0.82 8 0.6 2 6 1210
2 2 2
AE AE AE
34.56

AE
-0.8 -0.8
D C D C
1 lb 1 lb
1 lb 1 lb
-0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
+1 +1 +1 +1
x
A -0.8 B A -0.8 B
57
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Substituting the data into Eq. (1) and solving yields
11200 34.56
0 FAC
AE AE
FAC 324 lb (T) ANS

Since the numerical result is positive, AC is subjected to


tension as assumed.

Using this result, the forces in other members can be


found by equilibrium, using the method of joint.

58
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 10
Determine the force in member AC of the truss shown.

D C

6 ft

A B

8 ft
Actual Truss
59
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 11
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. E = 29,000 ksi

E (6 in.2) F
28 k

2) 2) (6
n. n.
6i 4i in. 2
15 ft
(4 in.2)

(4 in.2)
( ( )

A D
(6 in.2) B (6 in.2) C (6 in.2)
25 k 25 k
3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
Actual Truss
60
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
The truss is statically indeterminate to the first degree.
b + r = 2j
9 + 4 = 2(6)
13 > 12
13 12 = 1st degree
E (6 in.2) F
28 k

2) 2) (6
n. n.
6i 4i in. 2
15 ft
(4 in.2)

(4 in.2)
( ( )

A D

(6 in.2) B (6 in.2) C (6 in.2)


25 k 25 k
3 panels at 20 ft = 60 ft
61
Actual Truss
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution E F
28 k Actual Truss

A D Dx
Ax
B C
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy

Dx at hinged support D is selected as Redundant.


Primary structure is obtained by removing the effect of
Dx and replacing hinge by roller support there.
Primary structure is subjected separately to external
loading and redundant Force Dx.
62
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
Solution 28 k Primary
Structure

D
Ax A

B C D
Ay 25 k 25 k Dy

E 24 F
28 k

30 .67 53
.33
11
18 25
D
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D

25 k 25 k 32 k 63
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
D is horizontal deflection at point D of primary
structure due to external loading.

E 24 F
28 k
Primary
Structure
30 .67 53
.33
11
18 25
D
28 k A
52 B 42.67 C 42.67
D

25 k 25 k 32 k 64
18 k
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
Solution Redundant
Dx is applied

A Dx

B C D

DD=DxfDD

E 0 F

0 0 0
0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
65
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
Solution Redundant
Dx is applied

A Dx

B C D

DD=DxfDD

DD is horizontal deflection at point D due to redundant


force Dx.

66
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

fDD is horizontal deflection at point D due to unit force.

E 0 F

0 0 0
0 0
fDD
1k A 1k
1 B 1 C 1 D
67
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Compatibility Equation
0 D Dx f DD
28 k

Dx
Ax

Ay 25 k 25 k Dy

28 k Primary Redundant
Structure Dx is applied

D + Dx
Ax

Ay 25 k 25 k Dy DD=DxfDD
68
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

We will use virtual work method to find D and fDD.


Deflection of truss is calculated by

nNL
D
AE
where

n= axial force in truss members due to virtual unit load


acting at joint and in the direction of D
N= axial force in truss members due to real load acting
that causes D
69
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

We will use virtual work method to find D and fDD.


Deflection of truss is calculated by
2
n L
f DD
AE
where

n= axial force in truss members due to real unit load


acting at joint and in the direction of D
n= axial force in truss members due to virtual unit load
acting at joint and in the direction of D
70
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
TABLE
Member L (in.) A (in.2) N (k) n (k) nNL/A n2L/A F=N+nDx
(k/in.)
AB 240 6 52 1 2,080 40 6.22
BC 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
CD 240 6 42.67 1 1,706.8 40 -3.11
EF 240 6 -24 0 0 0 -24
BF 180 4 18 0 0 0 18
CF 180 4 25 0 0 0 25
AE 300 6 -30 0 0 0 -30
BF 300 4 11.67 0 0 0 11.67
DF 300 6 -53.33 0 0 0 -53.33
nNL 5,493.6 k/in.
D 5,493.6 120
AE E
2
n L 120 (1/in.)
f DD
AE E 71
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
nNL
D
AE
52 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12 42.67 1 20 12
D
6E 6E 6E
2080 1706.8 1706.8
D
6E 6E 6E
5493.6 k/in
D
E

72
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
n2 L
f DD
AE
1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12 1 1 20 12
f DD
6E 6E 6E
120 (1/in)
f DD
E
Now put these results into Equation (1)

5493.6 120
Dx 0 Dx 45.78 k
E E
73
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
F N nDx
FAB 52 1 45.78 6.22 (T)
FBC 42.67 1 45.78 3.11 (C)
FCD 3.11 (C)
Equation of Equilibrium
28 k

F 0
Ax 28 45.78 0 Ax=17.78 Dx=45.78

Ax 17.78 k Ay=18 25 k 25 k Dy=32

Ay 18 k
D y 32 k 74
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

E F
28 k Primary
Structure

Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A B C D
25 k 25 k
Ay =18 Dy = 32
E 24 F
28 k

30 .67 53
.33
11
18 25

Ax =17.78 Dx = 45.78
A 6.22 B 3.11 C 3.11
D

25 k 25 k 75
Ay =18 Dy = 32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 12
Determine the reactions and the force in each member
of the truss shown in Fig. shown. EA = constant. E = 200
GPa., A = 4000 mm2

F G H
70 kN

10m

A
B C D E

80 kN 80 kN

4 panels at 10m= 40m

Actual Truss
76
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

Degree of Indeterminacy = 2
b+r>2j
14 + 4 > 2 8
18 > 16 F G H
70 kN

Ax A E
B C D

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey

Actual Truss 77
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

Dy at support D and force FBG in member BG are selected


as redundants.

F G H
70 kN

Ax A E
B C D

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey

Actual Truss 78
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

The roller support at D is removed and member BG is


cut to make the structure determinate.

F G H
70 kN

Ax A E
B C D

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Ey

Determinate Truss 79
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual


loading, redundant Dy and redundant force in the
redundant member BG.

F G H
70 kN

BG

A E
B C D
D
80 kN 80 kN

80
Primary structure subjected to actual loading
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual


loading, redundant Dy and redundant force in the
redundant member BG.
BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H

A E
B C DD=DyfDD D
Dy
81
Redundant Dy applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
Principle of Superposition

This determinate truss is subjected separately to actual


loading, redundant Dy and redundant force in the
redundant member BG.
BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H

FBG FBG

A E
B C D,BG=FBGfD,BG D

82
Redundant FBG applied
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Actual Truss

A E
Ax
B C D
Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
BG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
D
80 kN 80 kN
+
BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H

Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 83
D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

BG,D=DyfBG,D
F G H
Redundant Dy applied

A E
B C DD=DyfDD D

Dy

F G H
Unit load in the direction
fBG,D
of Dy applied

A E
B C fDD D
84
1
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
Redundant FBG applied
FBG FBG

A E
B C D,BG=FBGfD,BG D

fBG,BG
F G H
Unit force in member
1 BG applied
1

A E
B C fD,BG D

85
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F G H
70 kN
Compatibility Actual Truss

A
Equation Ax
B C D
E

Ay 80 kN 80 kN Dy Ey
=
F G H
70 kN
BG
Primary structure
A E
B C D
D
80 kN 80 kN
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG +
BG,D=DyfBG,D
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG F G H

Redundant Dy applied
A E
B C DD=DyfDD D
+ Dy
BG,BG=FBGfBG,BG
F G H
FBG
FBG Redundant FBG applied
A E
B C 86
D,BG=FBGfD,BGD
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG

D = vertical deflection at joint D of primary truss due to external loading

BG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to external loading

fDD = vertical deflection at joint D due to a unit load at joint D

fBG,D = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit load at D

fBG,BG = relative displacement b/w cutting ends of member BG due to unit force

fD,BG = vertical deflection at joint D due to a unit force in member BG


87
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
We will use the method of virtual work to find the
deflections
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG

NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D f DD f D, BG
AE AE AE

NnBG L nBG nBG L nBG nD L


BG f BG f BG, D
AE AE AE

88
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
NnD L nD nD L nD nBG L
D f DD f D, BG
AE AE AE
nBG nBG L nBG nD L
BG
NnBG L f BG f BG, D
AE AE AE

N = member forces due to external loading


nD = member forces due to unit load at joint D
nBG = member forces due to unit force in member BG

The numerical values of the member forces, as computed


by the method of joints, are shown in next figures, and
are tabulated in the TABLE
89
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

N = member forces due to external loading

F 85 G 85 H
70 kN
3.5
.6 73 36 0 2 10
9.6
11
6 9.6 02
80 0 10 0
A E
70
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5

80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5

90
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

nD = member forces due to unit load at joint D

F 0.5 G 0.5 H
0.3
54 54 4 1.0
0.3 0.3
5 61
0 0 1
A E
0
0.25 B 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75

1 kN
0.25 0.75

91
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

nBG = member forces due to unit force in member BG

F 0.707 G 0 H
1 1
1
0 0
0.707

0.707
0
0
A E
0
0 B 0.707 C 0 D 0

0 0

92
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member L (m) N nD nBG NnDL NnBGL nD2L nBG2L nDnBGL F = N + nDDy +


(kN) (kN/kN) (kN/kN) (kN.m) (kN.m) (m) (m) (m) nBGFBG (kN)
AB 10 152.5 -0.25 0 -381.25 0 0.625 0 0 128.373

BC 10 152.5 -0.25 -0.707 -381.25 -1078.175 0.625 5 1.768 104.265

CD 10 77.5 -0.75 0 -581.25 0 5.625 0 0 5.12

DE 10 77.5 -0.75 0 -581.25 0 5.625 0 0 5.12

FG 10 -85 0.5 -0.707 -425 600.95 2.5 5 -3.535 -60.855

GH 10 -85 0.5 0 -425 0 2.5 0 0 -36.747

BF 10 80 0 -0.707 0 -565.60 0 5 0 55.891

CG 10 0 0 -0.707 0 0 0 5 0 -24.109

DH 10 0 -1 0 0 0 10 0 0 -96.507

AF 14.142 -116.673 0.354 0 -584.096 0 1.772 0 0 -82.51

BG 14.142 0 0 1 0 0 0 14.142 0 34.1

CF 14.142 3.536 -0.354 1 -17.702 50.006 1.772 14.142 -5.006 3.473

CH 14.142 109.602 0.354 0 548.697 0 1.772 0 0 143.765

EH 14.142 -109.602 1.061 0 -1644.541 0 15.92 0 0 -7.208

-4472.642 -992.819 48.736 48.284 -6.773

93
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation
0 D D y f DD FBG f D , BG
0 BG D y f BG, D FBG f BG, BG
4,472.642 kN .m 48.284 m
D f BG, BG
AE AE
992.819 kN .m 6.773 m
BG f BG, D f D , BG
AE AE
48.736 m
f DD
AE
By substituting these values into the above equations

94
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Compatibility Equation

4,472.642 48.736 D y 6.773FBG 0

992.819 6.773D y 48.284 FBG 0

Solving these equations simultaneously for Dy and FBG

D y 96.507 kN
FBG 34.1 kN

95
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

The remaining reactions of the indeterminate truss can


now be determined by superposition of reactions of
primary truss due to the external loading and due to
each of the redundants.

The forces in the remaining members of the


indeterminate truss can be determined by using the
superposition relationship

96
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
F 85 G 85 H
3
7 3.5 170 kN
6.6 36 02 09
11 9.6 .60
80 0 10 0 2

70 A E
152.5 B 152.5 C 77.5 D 77.5
80 kN 80 kN
82.5 77.5
+
F 0.5 G 0.5 H
0.3 1.0
54 54 5 4 61
0.3 0.3 1
0 0
0 A E
0.25 B 0.25 C 0.75 D 0.75

0.25 + 1 kN
0.75

F 0.707 G 0 H
1 1
1 0
0.707

0.707
0 0
0
0 A E
0 B 0.707 C 0 D 0

0 0
=

F 60.855 G 36.747 H
3.4 70 kN
73 7.2
.51
55.891

24.109

96.507
82 65 08
.1 3.7
A 34 14 Actual Truss
Ax=70 E
128.373 104.265 5.12 5.12
B C D
Ay=58.373 80 kN 80 kN Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12
97
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Actual Truss

F 60.855
G 36.747
H
70 kN
3.4
73

55.891
5 7.2
.76

24.109
1 3 08
2.5 .1 14
A 8 34

96.507
E
Ax=70 128.373
B 104.265
C 5.12
D 5.12

80 kN 80 kN
Ay=58.373 Dy=96.507 Ey=5.12

98

You might also like