You are on page 1of 2

Comments on (JRP) Monthly Report:

1. There is no project description.

2. Project progress summary calculation is not clear with the following


additional note (After repeated coordination, RADICON still uses its
own progress percentage measuring method).

3. Project organization chart is uncompleted (Office team,


Design/Engineering team, Planning/Coordination team and Site team)
and relations are not clear referring to chart legend (Direct Report and
Communication Channel should be added).

4. Project Time Schedule is not included.

5. Overall project progress is not included.


6. Histogram method of estimating the manpower is not clear.

Comments on (JRP) 3 weeks schedule Report:


1. Once the master schedule approved, the exact scheduled time must
be filled and tracking for each Civil activities will be done with
respect approved time schedule.
2. 3 weeks schedule should be checked and sign by SEC site
engineers.
3. Starting from next week, SEPCO should compare the Plane
percentage with actual progress in separate row (see copy attached for
more details).
4. The three weeks calculation shall be conducted from summary
progress of work.
Comments on (JRP) weekly Report:
1. Histogram method of estimating the manpower is not clear.
2. The exact day date for delivery of material should be mention.
3. The status of P.O and mention the expected date to place the P.O
for Unplaced P.O.
4. Delivery of materials date shall be matching with Master Time
Schedule.
5. Shipment release date should be included in material status report.
6. How SEPCO apply 3Ps method in calculating summary progress of
work.
7. ITP (valid date for FAT confirmed by Manufacturer)

You might also like