Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mode Conversion and Total Reflection of Torsional Waves for Pipe Inspection
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
(http://iopscience.iop.org/1347-4065/52/7S/07HC14)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 143.54.159.67
This content was downloaded on 12/04/2016 at 14:07
Mode Conversion and Total Reflection of Torsional Waves for Pipe Inspection
Nurmalia , Nobutomo Nakamura, Hirotsugu Ogi, and Masahiko Hirao
Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
E-mail: nurmalia@abc.me.es.osaka-u.ac.jp
Received November 22, 2012; accepted March 21, 2013; published online July 22, 2013
The group velocity of each higher torsional mode in a pipe depends on the wall thickness and it will convert to a lower mode when the thickness is
smaller than a critical value, the so-called cut-off thickness. The fundamental torsional mode, T0; 1, and the first higher mode, T0; 2, are
generated in pipes by an electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) and their mode conversion behaviors are investigated by changing the
shape of a defect on the pipe. It is confirmed that the conversion behavior is sensitive to the shape of thickness transition and the total reflection of
the T0; 2 mode occurs in a pipe with a tapered defect. On the basis of the mode conversion, defects with a cross-sectional loss larger than 35%
are detectable. # 2013 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
2.5 =5.22 mm
Lorentz force current
coil
2
Frequency (MHz)
1.5 T(0,3)
To AC
source
1 T(0,1)
T(0,2)
0.5 magnets
0
0 1 2 3 4 Fig. 2. Arrangement of four PPM-EMATs placed around a pipe and
Wave number (1/mm) schematic illustration of the involved elds directions. Pipe thickness is
(a) exaggerated in the left gure.
3 T(0,1)
ness and this eect is even more pronounced in the lower
T(0,2) frequency range. When the thickness reaches the cut-o
2 tc of T(0,2) T(0,3) thickness tc , the group velocity is zero and this mode is
expected to convert into lower mode(s). Thus, when the
tc of T(0,3) frequency is xed, the group velocity shows a dependence
1
on the thickness of the waveguide.
An EMAT basically has two components: a coil, which
0 provides a dynamic magnetic eld, and permanent magnet(s)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 or an electromagnet as a static eld source. In aluminum and
Frequency Thickness (MHz mm) other nonferromagnetic metals, an EMAT generates elastic
(b) waves by way of the Lorentz force mechanism. When an
alternating current drives the coil, which is located close to
Fig. 1. Dispersion curves for frequency-wave number (a) and group the specimen, an eddy current is generated on the surface of
velocity-frequency thickness (b) of torsional wave propagating in
the specimen. The interaction of this dynamic eld with the
aluminum pipe with inner/outer diameters of 19/25 mm.
static eld induces the Lorentz force, which creates acoustic
waves. The relative position between these two elds
determines the type of acoustic waves to be generated (and
having a vibration only in the circumferential direction while detected).
the wave propagates in the axial direction. As a convention, We built a transducer consisting of four PPM-EMATs
innite numbers of modes of torsional waves are designated to generate a specic mode of torsional waves. In the PPM-
as T0; m, where m denes the radial/thickness mode EMAT, dynamic and static elds are provided by an
parameter. Equation (1) presents the dispersion equation of elongated spiral coil and permanent magnets, respectively.
a torsional wave propagating in a pipe with a and b as the The permanent magnets lie atop of the coil to form a
inner and outer radii, respectively. perpendicular conguration of the dynamic and static elds.
The permanent magnets are arranged in such a way to
J1 r 0 Y1 r 0
A1 J1 r A2 Y1 r accommodate a periodically alternating magnetization in the
r ra;b r ra;b direction normal to the specimens surface. The periodicity
0 1 is equal to the wavelength of the generated waves in this
0 0
Here, J1 , Y1 , J1 , and Y1 are Bessel functions of the rst experimental case, 5:22 mm. Four PPM-EMATs were
and second kinds and their derivatives, respectively. With arranged to form a meandering pattern and placed around the
f as the frequency, as the wavelength, cs as the shear pipe specimen. One EMAT consists of a wound coil and two
wave velocity (3.1 mm/s for aluminum), ! 2f , and pairs of magnet arrangements with opposite magnetizations.
2=, is dened as One set of magnet arrangements provides a static magnetic
s
eld to two neighboring coils. There are seven magnets in
!2
2: 2 each arrangement such that the total number of magnets is
c2s twenty eight. The four PPM-EMATs placed around the pipe
The aluminum pipes used as specimens in this study have and the details of their arrangements, showing the direction
the inner and outer radii of 9.5 and 12.5 mm, respectively. of each eld, are presented in Fig. 2. The T0; 1 and T0; 2
Figure 1 shows the dispersion curves derived from Eq. (1) modes are excited by this EMAT conguration, whose
for the current specimen. The broken line indicates the xed displacement is uniform in the circumferential direction and
wavenumber used in this study (1.2 mm1 ). Group velocity periodic in the axis direction, they are generated at the
is dened as cg d!=d and its corresponding dispersion respective frequencies of 0.615 and 0.77 MHz.
curves are also presented in Fig. 1(b). The group velocity of
the fundamental T0; 1 mode is constant in the entire range 3. Experimental Setup
of frequency thickness. However, the velocity of each A pipe made of aluminum alloy A5052 is chosen as the
07HC14-2 # 2013 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52 (2013) 07HC14 Nurmalia et al.
0.3 T(0,1)
0.3 T(0,2)
(a) (a)
250 250
150 150
50 50
(b) (b)
250 250
150 150
50 50
(c) (c)
250 250
Time (s)
Time (s)
150 150
50 50
(d) (d)
250 250
150 150
50 50
(e) (e)
250 250
150 150
50 50
100 200 300 400 500 100 200 300 400 500
Distance (mm) Distance (mm)
Fig. 5. Wave propagation of T0; 1 mode generated in specimens with Fig. 6. Wave propagation of T0; 2 mode generated in the same pipes
edge angles of (a) 90 , (b) 30 , (c) 20 , (d) 10 , and (e) 5 . Edges of the used to obtain Fig. 5. Arrows show the total reection in (d) and (e).
thinning region are indicated by broken lines.
same as the velocity of 3.17 mm/s for the original thickness explained by the displacement redistribution as in the case
(3 mm), as shown in Fig. 7(a). The theoretical velocity of of SH guided waves.35) This conversion into a higher mode
this fundamental mode is equal to the shear wave velocity, is not observed in the case of specimens with a smoother
which is 3.1 mm/s for aluminum. This observation thickness change at the defects edge. Comparison between
indicates that the T0; 1 mode continues to travel through this experimental result and the theoretical dispersion
this region. However, when the thickness returns to the curves is presented in Fig. 8(a). The frequency is xed at
original at the far end, the observed traveling time is 0.615 MHz, which is the same as that in the experiment, such
1.8 mm/s, which is smaller than that before the defect. In that the horizontal axis is the thickness of the specimen. The
Fig. 5(a), it appears that most of the T0; 1 mode converts numbered arrows indicate the sequence of change in the
into the T0; 2 mode with a lower group velocity, while a measured group velocity in relation to the change in
small portion persists as the T0; 1 mode. The calculated thickness.
group velocity of the T0; 2 mode at frequency 0.615 MHz The T0; 2 mode is generated at a frequency of
is 1.7 mm/s. The mechanism of this conversion can be 0.77 MHz. The group velocity of the direct signal in the
07HC14-4 # 2013 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52 (2013) 07HC14 Nurmalia et al.
200 4
(a)
1.8 mm/ s 2
100 3.17 mm/ s
1
Traveling time (s)
150 4
250 6% of 0.4
circumference 100% of 25% circumference
Traveling time (s) circumference
0.2
200
0
150
-0.2
0
Fig. 9. Traveling time of the two modes propagating in awed specimens
with dierent grades of cross-sectional loss. -0.2
-0.4 * T(0,2)
These defects dier in circumferential length but are 0.4 100% circumference
equal in axial length (200 mm). Thickness reduction is
introduced on the outer surface of the pipe specimens and 0.2
the remaining thickness is 1 mm in each specimen. This
0
thickness is smaller than the cut-o thickness of the T0; 2
mode; therefore, this mode should convert to the T0; 1 -0.2
mode. The conversion is observed as a group velocity
change, which causes a decrease in the measured traveling -0.4 *
time. In this experiment, a quartz transducer is replaced by 0 100 200
another identical EMAT. In the practical application based Time (s)
on the proposed method, both the transmitter and receiver
sides should be EMATs. In addition, by using an EMAT as a Fig. 10. Received waveforms when T0; 2 mode is generated in
receiver, it is possible to detect only the intended mode. The specimens containing dierent percentages of circumferential defect.
two EMATs are separated by a xed distance with the defect Signals with an asterisk are aected by conversion to T0; 1 mode at the
located between them. The rest of the experimental setup is defect.
the same as shown in Fig. 3, but a matching impedance
circuit is inserted between the receiving EMAT and the pre
amplier. The T0; 1 and T0; 2 modes are generated in wave is the original T0; 2 mode. In the last specimen with
each specimen and the traveling times are measured. a full-circumference defect, the entire wave converts to
The measured traveling time is presented in Fig. 9 as a the T0; 1 mode at the defect, resulting in a shorter traveling
function of the ratio of the cross-sectional area loss with time. It then can be concluded that with the present
respect to the original defect-free pipe. A full-circumfer- conguration, the phenomenon of conversion to a higher
ential defect reduces the cross-sectional area by 69.7%. As a mode can be a basis to detect a loss in pipe thickness that
reference, the traveling time for each mode propagating in a covers approximately one-half of its circumference.
defect-free specimen (0% cross sectional loss) for the same
distance is also included. 5. Conclusions
As expected, the traveling time of the T0; 1 mode does Torsional waves are successfully generated by the current
not show any signicant dependence on the cross-sectional EMAT and the propagation behavior of the T0; 1 and
loss. However that of the T0; 2 mode varies depending on T0; 2 modes is explored. The group velocity dependence
the cross-sectional loss. When the cross-sectional loss is on thickness induced by the mode conversion for each
close to 35%, which corresponds to approximately one-half mode is observed by traveling time measurements in pipe
of the circumference or more, the traveling time suddenly specimens containing thinning regions. The inuence of a
decreases. This is explained by the mode conversion from defects edge shape on mode conversion is also investigated.
the T0; 2 mode to the T0; 1 mode; the T0; 1 mode has It is conrmed that the group velocity of the T0; 1 mode
a higher group velocity at the defect resulting in a shorter in the wall-thinning region is independent of thickness
traveling time. Figure 10 shows the waveforms when T0; 2 owing to its nondispersive characteristic. However, the
mode is generated in specimens with approximately 25%, T0; 1 mode converts to T0; 2 mode at the far edge of
60% and full-circumference defects. In the rst specimen, the defect, in response to an abrupt thickness increase. This
the narrow defect does not cause mode conversion and the conversion does not occur when the thickness transition at
detected signal consists of only the T0; 2 mode. In the the edge is gradual. It is also observed that the T0; 1 is
second specimen, the generated wave apparently splits into hardly reected at the defects edge of this type.
two waves. The rst wave, marked with an asterisk, arrives When the thickness is smaller than the cut-o thickness,
earlier because it experiences mode conversion to the T0; 1 the T0; 2 mode converts to the T0; 1 mode. Conversion
mode, which has a higher velocity at the defect. The second back to the T0; 2 mode is observed when the thickness
07HC14-6 # 2013 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52 (2013) 07HC14 Nurmalia et al.
increases to the original value. A more gradual thickness 16) X. Wang, P. W. Tse, C. K. Mechefske, and M. Hua: NDT&E Int. 43 (2010)
365.
change at a defect enhances the reection of the T0; 2 17) H. Sato and H. Ogiso: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 49 (2010) 07HC08.
mode. When the thickness change is very slow, total 18) A. Demma, P. Cawley, M. Lowe, and A. G. Roosenbrand: J. Acoust. Soc.
reection occurs at the cut-o thickness, which is located Am. 114 (2003) 611.
within the slope. This conversion to the T0; 1 mode occurs 19) A. Lvstad and P. Cawley: NDT&E Int. 44 (2011) 553.
20) A. Lvstad and P. Cawley: NDT&E Int. 46 (2012) 83.
even when the thickness reduction exists only in approxi- 21) H. E. Engan: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (1998) 2015.
mately one-half of the circumference. From these results, it 22) H. E. Engan: IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 46 (1999)
can be concluded that mode conversion can be the basis of 1035.
wall-thinning detection. Combining this behavior and total 23) R. Carandente, J. Ma, and P. Cawley: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127 (2010)
3440.
reection phenomena can provide a potential method for 24) H. Nishino, S. Masuda, Y. Mizobuchi, and K. Yoshida: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
pipeline inspection. A further attempt to implement the 49 (2010) 116602.
proposed method for application is required. 25) H. Nishino, T. Tanaka, S. Katashima, and K. Yoshida: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
50 (2011) 046601.
26) H. Kwun, S. Y. Kim, and M. S. Choi: J. Korean Phys. Soc. 46 (2005) 1352.
27) Y. Y. Kim, C. I. Park, S. H. Cho, and S. W. Han: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117
1) Pipeline Accident Report: Rupture of hazardous liquid pipeline with (2005) 3459.
release and ignition of propane, Carmichael, Mississippi, November 1, 28) S. H. Cho, S. W. Han, C. I. Park, and Y. Y. Kim: J. Appl. Phys. 100 (2006)
2007. National Transportation Safety Board (2009). 104903.
2) Pipeline Accident Report: Pacic gas and electric company natural gas 29) R. B. Thompson: Physical Acoustics (Academic Press, New York, 1990)
transmission pipeline rupture and re, Sun Bruno, California, September 9, p. 157.
2010. National Transportation Safety Board (2011). 30) W. Johnson, B. A. Auld, and G. A. Alers: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 (1994)
3) F. Hasan, J. Iqbal, and F. Ahmed: Eng. Fail. Anal. 14 (2007) 801. 1413.
4) Z. A. Majid, R. Mohsin, Z. Yaacob, and Z. Hassan: Eng. Fail. Anal. 17 31) M. Hirao and H. Ogi: NDT&E Int. 32 (1999) 127.
(2010) 818. 32) Y. Okawa, R. Murayama, H. Morooka, and Y. Yamashita: Jpn. J. Appl.
5) X. B. Li, X. Li, L. Chen, P. F. Feng, H. D. Wang, and Z. Y. Huang: Phys. 48 (2009) 07GD07.
J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 23 (2009) 109. 33) C. F. Vasile and R. B. Thompson: J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) 2583.
6) Y. Sun and Y. Kang: NDT&E Int. 43 (2010) 348. 34) M. Hirao and H. Ogi: EMATs for Science and Industry Noncontacting
7) J. Atzlesberger and B. Zagar: Procedia Eng. 5 (2010) 1401. Ultrasonic Measurements (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 2003) p. 47.
8) G. Y. Tian and A. Sopian: NDT&E Int. 38 (2005) 77. 35) Nurmalia, N. Nakamura, H. Ogi, and M. Hirao: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50
9) J. B. Nestleroth and R. J. Davis: NDT&E Int. 40 (2007) 77. (2011) 07HC17.
10) Z. Xu, X. Wu, J. Li, and Y. Kang: NDT&E Int. 51 (2012) 24. 36) Nurmalia, N. Nakamura, H. Ogi, M. Hirao, and K. Nakahata: NDT&E Int.
11) J. L. Rose, J. J. Ditri, A. Pilarski, K. Rajana, and F. Carr: NDT&E Int. 27 45 (2012) 156.
(1994) 307. 37) Nurmalia, N. Nakamura, H. Ogi, and M. Hirao: AIP Conf. Proc. 1511
12) M. J. S. Lowe, D. N. Alleyne, and P. Cawley: Ultrasonics 36 (1998) 147. (2013) 909.
13) J. L. Rose: Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media (Cambridge University Press, 38) S. A. Uribe, N. Nakamura, H. Ogi, and M. Hirao: AIP Conf. Proc. 1096
Cambridge, U.K., 1999) Chap. 12. (2008) 1550.
14) H. J. Shin and J. L. Rose: Ultrasonics 37 (1999) 355. 39) K. A. Macdonald, A. Cosham, C. R. Alexander, and P. Hopkins: Eng. Fail.
15) J. L. Rose: Key Eng. Mater. 270273 (2004) 14. Anal. 14 (2007) 1667.