Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PURPOSE
To figure out the best way to make cheese, find a different way to make it, and to find out
HYPOTHESIS
For experiment one, I believe that Chymosin(FPC) would be the fastest to curdle out of
Chymosin(NCB), Buttermilk, and Water(- control). For experiment two, this is when we
had to change a variable to see if it made a difference in the cheese, and we used
Chymosin(FPC) and Chymosin(FPC) but with three times the amount of curdling agent.
For this, my group believed that the one with the three times the curdling agent would be
faster to curdle, and to also be the one to change the cheese. For the last experiment, I
tested lipids, and I believed the water would be translucent and the oil would be
non-translucent.
PROCEDURE
Experiment 1:
1.) Label four 6ML tubes with the type of curdling agent and group members.
2.) Use large pipet to transfer 3ML of milk to each of the 6ML tubes.
3.) Use small pipet and transfer the entire contents of tubes of fermentation produced
Water- fill small transfer pipet to bottom of bulb and add to labeled tube
containing milk. Use different pipet for each transfer to avoid cross
contamination.
4.) Cap tubes and invert tubes 3 times then transfer to 37C water or place at body
5.) Set timer, check for curdling every 5 min by gently inverting the tube and
7.) If milk hasnt curdled in 30 min, check for curdling every hour.
11.) Transfer entire contents of tube into labeled filter paper cone over a suitable
collection vessel. Once all liquid drained through, dry filter paper with curds
overnight.
12.) Weight the dry cone with dry curds. Subtract dry cone weight. Record the
14.) Create data table that reports the Rate of Curd Production(weight/time) by
15.) Create bar graph that shows the Rate of Curd Production(weight/time) by each
curdling Agent.
Experiment 2:
1.) Label two 6ML tubes with one regular and one with 3 times the curdling agent.
3.) Use small pipet and transfer the entire contents of the tubes of fermentation
4.) Cap tubes and invert tubes three time then transfer to body temperature.
5.) Set timer, check for curdling every 5 min, by gently inverting the tube and
8.) In data table, record time(in min) when milk begins to curdle(small or large
lumps) or solidify.
9.) For each treatment, weigh paper cone and record empty cone weight.
10.) Transfer the entire contents of a tube into a labeled filter paper cone over a
suitable collection vessel. Once all liquid has drained through, dry filter paper
11.) Weight any cone with cry curds. Subtract dry cone weight. Record weight of
Experiment 3:
1.) Test for lipid(s): Place a drop of oil(100% fat) on a piece of brown paper bag. Let it
dry for 10 minutes. Hold up the paper to light. Record how much light passes
2.) Test for water: Place a drop of water on a piece of brown paper bag. Let it dry
for 10 minutes. Hold up the paper to light. Record how much light passes through
DATA/OBSERVATIONS
Part one:
This picture represents our class average, and as you can see Chymosin(FPC) has the
quickest rate out of the rest of them. Reasons for this is because it had the fastest time to
curdle(5 minutes).
Part two:
This describes and shows how much curling each liquid did(weight of the curds) how
much the cone was when the curds were on it, and how much the rate was for each of
them.
Part three:
This shows the Chymosin(FPC) and the Chymosin(FPC) with three times the curdling
agent. As you can see, the Chymosin with 3x the curdling agent, has a quicker rate. The
reason for that is there was more of the curdling agent in the tube.
ANALYSIS
Buttermilk, and Water(- control) would curdle the fastest. For my hypothesis, I believed
that Chymosin(FPC) would be the fastest to curdle. My hypothesis was correct, the
chymosin(FPC) curdled in 5 minutes while the rest of them didnt curdle until the next
day(1,380 minutes). The errors for this experiment was that we didnt measure the
right/accurate amounts for the milk. Chymosin(NCB) and water(- control) had more milk
than Chymosin(FPC) and Buttermilk. Also, the way we used to curdle it, which was with
our armpits that we used for heat, I felt like if we put it in an incubator to make it more
successful and more accurate with our results. Otherwise, everything went successfully.
Some ways we could improve this experiment is that we could use something other than
our armpits for heat, we could use something more accurate to measure our liquids and
when we transfer them into different things. How this could lead to a further
investigation is that if we fix our errors, and improve things to make it more successful,
For our second experiment, which was to change a variable in order to make the
difference in the cheese, and we changed the amount of the curdling agent. For this, we
used the same liquid(Chymosin FPC) since it was the one that was the quickest to curdle.
We had a regular one of the Chymosin(FPC) and Chymosin(FPC) with three times the
curdling agent. Although, it didnt make a difference to the time of when it was done
curdling. There was only a difference in the weight of curds, and the rate for each one.
In this case, my hypothesis is incorrect, I believed the curdling for this, that the three
times the agent would be faster, but instead, they still ended at the same time of
curdling(5 minutes). In this experiment, we didnt have any errors to make the results
possibly incorrect, we follow the procedure and made sure we measured everything
correctly. Things that we could improve for this experiment is that we could again, have
a different heat source instead of using our armpits. Everyones armpits have a different
amount of heat in there body so overall, all of the liquids would have the same amount of
heat for the same amount of time. How this could lead to a further investigation is if we
had the same heat capacity it would possibly lead to have a better result for the cheese.
For the third experiment, my group split up and we each picked a different liquid to test,
in this case, I chose lipids. I believed that the water would be translucent and the oil
the paper bag. Translucent is just the opposite, not letting light go through the bag. My
hypothesis was correct, the oil was non-translucent while the water was translucent. For
the rest of the other liquids that my other group members tested was glucose, starch, and
protein. The indicator we used for glucose was Benedicts solution, starch was Lugols
iodine, and protein was Bluret reagent. In this experiment, we didnt make any errors to
make anything inaccurate. Things that we could use to improve this lab was like I said to
the first two experiments, our heat capacity should all be the same in order for it to all be
accurate as a whole. In this case, we couldve used an incubator for the heat capacity.
Lastly, how this could lead to further investigations is if we had the same heat capacity to
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our measuring was inaccurate. When we were measuring out our milk in
experiment one we did not measure all of them accurately. The Chymosin(NCB) and
water(- control) had different quantities in their tubes compared to the amounts of
Chymosin(FPC) and Buttermilk. The reason for this is when we used the small tube to
suck up all of the milk, I squeezed all of the droppers differently for each of the tubes and
that caused for inaccurate measurements for the milk. Overall, we did get results for the
experiment, but they wouldve been more accurate if Id squeezed them all with the