Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOLAR2012 0483 Presentation PDF
SOLAR2012 0483 Presentation PDF
• Parapets
• Roof mounted equipment
• Slippery surface
• Larger, taller buildings
• Strong NW or NE winds
• Installation error
2
Solar Arrays on Schools:
Parking Garages
Flat Roofs
Sloped
Roofs
What about
other
installations?
4
What design wind loading should be enforced if not
covered in ASCE 7 prescriptive methods?
ASCE 7
Wind Tunnel Study
What’s an
appropriate wind
tunnel study?
CBC Amendments
Current (2013?)
Efforts
• SEAOC Wind
Committee
• Solar ABC ASCE 7 IBC
• Technical (2016?) (2018?)
Papers
• Wind Tunnel
Studies
• ASCE 49
7
Renusol America, Inc.
CPP - Renusol CS60 Wind Tunnel tests
Bart Leusink – President & CEO
1
Renusol CS60
2
ASCE 7-05 – Method 1 - Wind Load Zones (Flat Roof)
3
ASCE 7-05 – Method 1 - Examples
4
10 Degrees
5
20 Degrees
6
30 Degrees
7
40 Degrees
8
50 Degrees
9
60 Degrees
10
70 Degrees
11
90 Degrees
12
110 Degrees
13
130 Degrees
14
140 Degrees
15
150 Degrees
16
160 Degrees
17
170 Degrees
18
NE Wind Direction – ‘Worst-Case Each Panel’
19
SE Wind Direction – ‘Worst-Case Each Panel’
20
Renusol CS60 – Wind Load Load Zones (ASCE7-05 Method 3)
21
Renusol CS60 - Examples – Different Building Sizes
22
ASCE 7-05 – Method 1 and 3 Comparison
23
The Renusol CS60 System
The system is designed as a modular system: ‘1 Renusol CS60 = 1 panel’, making it easy
for budgeting and estimation purposes.
Ballast in the high load, corner zones can further be reduced by adding ‘strut’ as a
‘North-South’ connection.
This makes the Renusol CS60 system extremely flexible and cost efficient, we can add
rigidity and strength where needed (the high load corner zones), but eliminate the cost
of components and installation labor where it is not needed. These saving become
even more prevalent on very large projects (multi-MW size)
Renusol CS60 – Roof Zones and Ballasts
CORRELATION BETWEEN BUILDING SIZE AND ‘WIND LOAD ZONES’ ON THE ROOF
= Area where strut would be applied to add strength and reduce ballast weights
Adding ‘North-South’ Connections – When and Where needed
Renusol CS60 – MD Project
27
Renusol CS60 – Hollywood, CA
28
Renusol CS60 – CA Project
29
Current Practices –
Wind Load Estimates for PV Arrays
Codes
- Most SE’s use ASCE, some use IBC
Current Practices
- Apply code directly, or
- Apply combination of code and wind tunnel data
- Proposed future practice – free online DNV Wind Load Calculator
Use of Code
- Ground-Mounted
- Most SE’s use ASCE “Open Buildings, Main Wind Force Resisting System,
Monoslope Roof” (probably best)
- Some have used ASCE tables for signs (wrong)
- Often calcs cover only static load analyses on posts / piers – no other
components (struts, gear/motor, modules, hardware, welds..?)
- SE’s regularly rely on manufacturer’s data with little or no review
- Many structures have a low natural frequency (<1 Hz to 2 Hz) – could be
vulnerable to resonance
- Roof-Mounted
- Many SE’s base calculations on Open Buildings - neglects impact of walls,
significant roof edge vortices
- Most base calculations on Enclosed Buildings, using tables for the slope of the
roof
- Most use tables for components and cladding, even for large structures
- Wide variety of approaches to determine GCpi (internal pressure coefficient)
- Ballasted PV Systems
- Often installed on single ply roof membranes that can be subject to billowing – not part of
wind tunnel test or design practices
North Row,
Middle of
Roof
colleen.obrien@dnv.com