Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IBR CALCULATION
7
Drum:
1) Shell : -
Max. Working Temp. 454oC.
Min. UTS of Pl . = 42 Kg/mm2(g)
Permissible Stress = f = 0.36 x 42/1.5 = 10.08 Kg/mm2(g)
And, f = UTS / 2.7 = 42 / 2.7 = 15.55 Kg/mm2
Ligament Efficiency:-
(a) For Down Comer :- d = 76.6, P = 410
E =( P-d)/p =(410 – 76.6)/410 = 0.813
(b) For Roof Tubes : - d = 76.6, P = 320
E =( P-d )/p =( 320 – 76.6) / 320 = 0.760
Taking the minimum of the two, ligament efficiency for further calculations = E = 0.760
I.D. of Shell = 912 – 20 = 892 mm
Thk. of shell plate = T = 10 mm
W.P. = 2.f.E (T-C) /( D + T-C) Where, C = 0.762 (Constant)
= 2 x 10.08 x 0.760 (10-0.762) / (892 + 10 – 0.762)
= 0.1570 Kg/mm2
= 15.70 Kg/Cm2(g)
Therefore the thickness (10 mm) of shell plate proposed is adequate for a W.P. of 10.50
Kg/Cm2(g).
: 2 :
: 4 :
2) Side Ring:
t = 20, f = 10.08 kg/mm2, d = 118, c = 1, k = 0.4
f = 0.36 x 42 / 1.5 = 10.08 kg/mm2
W.P. = f ( t – c)2 / d2k
= 10.08 (20 – 1)2 / (118)2 x 0.4
= 0.653346 kg/mm2
= 65.33 kg/cm2
Hence the size of side ring ( 20 mm thk.) is adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
Contd………P/5-
: 5 :
Contd……..P/6-
: 6 :
: 7 :
(b) Inbed Tubes:
d = 63.5 , t = 4.06
W.P = 2 x 7.44 x 1 (4.06 – 0.75) /(63.5 – 4.06 + 0.75)
= 0.8183 kg/mm2
= 81.83 kg/cm2(g).
Hence the proposed thickness of tube is safe and adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 Kg/Cm2(g).
Compensation Required = x = dn x es
= 97.18 x 7.69 = 689.00 mm2
Let Eqv. Thk. of Nozzle = en
UTS of Nozzle = 31 kg/mm2
fn = 0.36 x 31 / 1.5 = 7.44 kg/mm2
en = (97.18 – 0.762) x 0.105 + 2 x 7.44 x 0.762 / (2 x 7.44 – 0.105)
= 1.452 mm.
Thickness of Shell = ts = 10 mm
b = Least Value of 2.5 ts Or 2.5 tn
= 2.5 x 10 Or 2.5 x 8.56 = 25 Or 21.4
Contd………..P/8-
: 8 :
b = 21.4
C1 = Greater of ( ts + 75 ) Or dn / 2
= ( 10 + 75 ) Or 97.18 / 2
= 85 Or 48.59
C1 = 85
Cw = Agregate area of Fillet Weld = 2 x (8.56)2 x ½
= 73.27 mm2
fn / ts = 7.44/10 = 0.744
Compensation = Available = Y = 2 ( tn - en ) b. fn / ts + 2. tn . b. fn / ts + 2. ( ts – es) C1 + Cw
= 2 x ( 8.56 – 1.452 ) 21.4 x 0.744
+ 2 x 8.56 x 21.4 x 0.744
+ 2 ( 10 – 7.09 ) 85 + 73.27
= 1066.88 mm2
Y X
Compensation Required = x = dn x es
= 122.24 x 7.10 = 867.90 mm2
Let Eqv. Thk. of Nozzle = en
Contd….P/9-
: 9:
: 10 :
Heating Surface:
1) Generating Tubes:-
d = 76.2, l = 6050, n = 81
H.S. = x 76.2 x 6050 x 81 / 106 = 117.313
: 11 :
( S. K. MULLICK )
bp/sm/pkb.
291,293,288,287,Revised-287,290,187,Eco.,295
2- 12-19-26- 37-39-47-56-57
CALCULATION SHEET
Contd….P/4-
:: 4 ::
E = 0.95
Te = Equivalent thk. of nozzle for opening of
406 mm at a pressure of 10.5 kg/cm2
c = 0.762
W.P = 2 x f x E (te – c)/(D + t – c)
0.175 = 2 x 11.28 x 0.95 (te – 0.762)/(406 + te – 0.762)
Or te = 4.10 mm.
a = 2 x 10 x 50 = 1000 mm2
h/D= 0.262.
Contd….P/5-
:: 5 ::
\In both calculation the value is higher than the proposed working pressure. So the selected thk. of plate i.e. 16 mm is safe &
adequate for a working pressure of 17.50 kg/cm2(g).
Hence, the provided dia 32 mm of stay bar is adequate for a working pressure of 17.50 kg/cm2(g)
\W.P = 2.f x e (t – c) / (d – t + c)
d = 76.2 mm,
t = 3.25 mm.
2) In Bed Tube:
d = 63.5 mm
t = 4.06
\In all the cases the calculated value is more than proposed W.P. Hence, the selected thk. of tube are adequate for a W.P. of 17.50
kg/cm2
Contd….P/8-
:: 8 ::
= 10 + 75 or 97.18 / 2
= 85 or 48.59
c1 = 85
\Cw = Agregated area of fillet weld = 2 x (8.56)2 x ½
= 73.27 mm2
fn/fs = 11.28/11.28 = 1
= 1237.47
Y>X
Hence there is no need of extra compensation.
Contd….9/-
:: 9 ::
HEATING SURFACE:
1) Generating Tubes:
d = 76.2
l = 6050 mm
n = 74
2) Roof Tubes:
d = 76.2
l = 5779
n=6
= 1.29 m2
5) In Bed Tubes:
d = 63.5
l = 2250
n = 29
:: 10 ::
CALCULATION FOR SAFETY VALVE : (Reg.293)
= 3303.13 mm2
p / 4 d2 = 3303.13
(P. Swain )
Design Engineer
IBR CALCULATION
:: 2 ::
DRUM
1) Shell
Max. Working Temp. = 185oC. < 454oC.
Min. UTS of Pl . = 47 Kg/Cm2(g)
Permissible Stress = f = 0.36 x 47 / 1.5 = 11.28 Kg/Cm2(g)
Ligament Efficiency:-
(a) For Down Comer :- d = 76.6, P = 410
E1 = P-d/p = (410 – 76.6)/410 = 0.813
(b) For Roof Tubes :- d = 76.6, P = 320
E2 = P-d/p = (320 – 76.6 ) / 320 = 0.760
Taking minimum of the two, ligament efficiency for further calculations = E = 0.760
O.D. of Shell = 912 mm
Thk. of shell plate = T = 10 mm
\ I.D of shell = D = 9.2 – 10 x 2 = 892 mm
\ W.P. = 2.f.E (T-C) / (D + T-C ) Where, C = 0.762 (Constant)
= 2 x 11.28 x 0.760 (10-0.762) / ( 892 + 10 – 0.762)
= 0.1757 Kg/mm2
= 17.57 Kg/Cm2(g)
Therefore the thickness (10 mm) of shell plate proposed is adequate for a W.P. of 10.50
Kg/Cm2 (g).
2) Dished End
UTS of d/e = 47 kg/mm2, \ f = 0.36 x 47 / 1.5 = 11.28 Kg/mm2
Thk. of d/e = 12 mm
Thk. of d/e after dishing (considering 12.5% thinning)
= 12 – 0.125 x 12 = 10.50 mm.
R2 = 762, d2 = 162
\ h = R2 - Ö{(R2 – D/2) (R2 + D/2 – 2 r2)}
= 762 - Ö{(762 – 9.2/2) (762 + 412 / 2 – 2 x 162)}
= 762 – 523
= 239
h/D ratio = 239 / 912 = 0.262
Contd…….P/3-
:: 3 ::
: 4 :
Total Effective Compensating
= 1000 x 42 / 47 + 2913 x 42/47
= 893.62 + 2603.11
= 3496.73 mm2
d1 = d – A/T = 446 – 3496.73 / 10.5 = 112.98
Ratio d1/ Ö DT = 112.98 / Ö(912 x 10.5)
= 1.15
Valve of ‘K’ from fig. 23(D) of IBR = 1.3
Working Pressure of d/e
= W.P. = 2.f (T-C) / DK (Reg. 278)
= 2 x 11.28 (10.5 – 0.75) / 912 x 1.3 (\ c = 0.78 )
= 0.1855 kg/mm2
= 18.55 kg/cm2
Hence the thickness (12 mm) of dished end proposed is adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
: 5 :
Stay Pins
Load on stay = 10.5 x 160 x 160 = 2688 Kg.
Stress on Stay = 2688 / p/4 d2 , d = 32 mm ( dia of stay pin )
= 2688 / p /4 (32)2
= 3.342 kg/mm2
= 334.2 kg/cm2
Min UTS of stay pin = 37 kg/mm2
Stress = f = 0.36 x 37 / 1.5 = 8.88 kg/mm2
= 888 kg/cm2 (g).
The developed stress is less than the stress capacity of the stay pin. Therefore the proposed stay pin is safe and adequate for a W.P.
of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
Contd……..P/6-
:: 6 ::
Heating Surface
1) Generating Tubes:-
d = 76.2, l = 6050, n = 127
H.S. = p x 76.2 x 6050 x 127 / 106 = 183.93 M2
2) Roof Tubes :- (Half Exposed)
d = 76.2, l = 5779, n = 6
\ HS2 = p x 76.2 x 5779 x 6 / 2 x 106 = 4.15 M2
= 1.26 M2
( P. SWAIN )
JR. MANAGER (Q.A.)
CALCULATION SHEET
:: 3 ::
Comp. plate thk. = 10 mm.
Width of compensation = 50 mm.
Thk. of nozzle(M.H.Ring) = 20 mm.
Height of nozzle( –do-) = 80 mm
Height above of d/e = 55 mm.
:: 4 ::
E = 0.95
Te = Equivalent thk. of nozzle for opening of
406 mm at a pressure of 10.5 kg/cm2
c = 0.762
a = 2 x 10 x 50 = 1000 mm2
h/D= 0.262.
Contd….P/5-
:: 5 ::
Hence, the provided dia 32 mm of stay bar is adequate for a working pressure of 17.50 kg/cm2(g)
Hence there is no need of extra compensation.
HEATING SURFACE:
1) Generating Tubes:
d = 76.2
l = 6050 mm
n =104
2) Roof Tubes:
d = 76.2
l = 5779
n=6
= 1.40 m2
Contd….P/7-
:: 7 ::
= 637 mm2
p / 4 d2 = 637
(P. Swain )
Design Engineer
CALCULATION SHEET
: 2 :
1. DRUM:
Max. Temp. = 2070C. \Working Metal Temp. = 207 + 10 = 2170C.
Min. UTS of shell plate = 47 kg/mm2
R1 = 912, r2 = 162.
Contd….P/3-
: 3 :
Contd….P/4-
: 4 :
T = Min. thk. in head.
c = 0.762 (constant)
\te = (406 – 0.762) 0.175 + 2 x 11.28 x 0.95 x 0.762/(2 x 11.28 x 0.95 – 0.175)
= 4.22 mm.
Compensation:
Hence, the proposed thickness of d/e (12 mm) is safe & adequate for a W.P1 of
17.50 kg/cm2(g)
Contd….P/5-
: 5 :
In both the cases the calculated value is higher than the proposed working pressure. So, the selected thickn ess of plates (16 mm) is
safe & adequate for a W.P. of 17.50 kg/cm2(g).
3. Stay Pins
d = 32 mm
f = 0;.36 x 37/1.5 = 8.88 kg/mm2
Load capacity = 8.88 x p/4(32)2 = 7141.7 kg.
Contd….P/6-
: 6 :
Hence the size of stay pins proposed is safe & adequate for a W.P.
of 17.50 kg/cm2(g).
In both the cases the calculated value is higher than the proposed W.P. so the selected
Thickness of T.P is safe & adequate.
2) Side Ring
3) Stay Pins
Contd….P/7-
: 7 :
Working Pressure of Tubes
\f = (0.36 x 31)/1.5
= 0.8183 kg/mm2
= 81.83 kg/cm2(g)
= 0.6369 kg/mm2
= 63.69 KG/cm2(g)
: 8 :
I.D. of drum = 1026 mm
= 122.24 x 8.78
= 1073.27 mm2
=30 or 23.825
\b = 23.825
= Greater of 87 or 61.12
Contd….P/9-
: 9 :
\C1 = aggregate area of fillet weld.
=2 x (9.53)2 x ½ = 90.82 mm2
fn/fs = 11.28/11.28 = 1
= 1477.36 mm2
Y>X
ts = 12 mm
\b = 27.425
Contd….P/10-
: 10 :
\C1 = 87.
= 1779.27 mm2
Y>X
HEATING SURFACE:
2) Roof Tubes:
3) Part of Drum:
Contd….P/11-
: 11 :
5) Headers:
= 312.73 + 32.79
= 345.52 M2
SAFETY VALVE:
Evaporation = 30 kgs/hr/m2
= 10365.6 kgs/hr.
E = CAP
( P. SWAIN )
HEATING SURFACE:
2) Roof Tubes:
3) Part of Drum:
5) Headers:
= 312.78 + 32.79
= 345.57 M2
SAFETY VALVE:
Evaporation = 30 kgs/hr/m2
= 10367.1 kgs/hr.
E = CAP
Contd….P/2-
:: 2 ::
( P. SWAIN )
Design Engineer
PRESSURE CALCULATION
: 2 :
Headers:
1) From Wall Panel Top and Bottom Headers and Rear Wall Panel Top and Bottom Headers -
d = 141.3, Min Thickness t = 6.55,
Min. pitch ( taken) = 76, E = 76 – 51.2 / 76 = 0.326
UTS = 47 Kg/mm2, \ f = 0.36 x 47 / 1.5 = 11.28 Kg/mm2
\ W.P. = 2 f E ( t – c ) /( d - t – c)
= 2 x 11.28 x 0.326 (6.55 – 0.762) / (141.3 – 6.55 - 0.762)
= 0.3177 Kg/mm2
= 31.77 Kg/Cm2(g)
Therefore this material proposed for the headers is safe and adequate for a W.P. of
21 Kg/Cm2(g)
1) Shell:
UTS = 47 kg/mm2, \ f = 0.36 x 47 / 1.5 = 11.28 kg/mm2
d = 1000, t = 16 mm, c = 0.762
Contd….P/5-
:: 5 ::
\ W.P. = 2 f E ( t – c) /( d-t-c)
= 2 x11.28 x 0.95 ( 16 – 0.762 ) /( 1000 – 16 – 0.762)
= 0.3321 kg/mm2
= 33.21 kg/cm2 (g)
Therefore the thickness proposed ( 16 mm) is safe and adequate for a W.P of 21.0 Kg/Cm2(g).
Steam Collecting Header, Main Down Commer and Bottom Rear Cross Header:-
Connecting Headers:-
d = 141.3, t = 6.55 – 0.125 x 6.55 = 5.73125
E = 0.95, C = 0.762, f = 11.26 kg/mm2
\ W.P. = 2 x 11.26 x 0.95 ( 5.73125 –0.762) / (141.3 – 5.73125 – 0.762)
= 0.7900 Kg/mm2
= 79.00 Kg/Cm2 (g)
Heating Surface:
1) Boiler = 350 M2
2) Economiser = 70 M2
Total - 420 M2
Safety Valves:
E = CAP
A = E / CP
= 420 x 30 / 0.4 x 22 ( Making Contact = 0.4 )
= 1431.82
Contd….P/8-
:: 8 ::
\ d = Ö 1421.82 x 4 / p
= 42.69 mm
( P. SWAIN )
CALCULATION SHEET
: 2 :
: 3 :
Width of Comp. Pad = 65 mm.
Thk. of M.H. Ring = 20 mm
Height of M.H. Ring = 85 mm.
Height of portion of ring above the lower portion of d/e = 57 mm
″ below the -do- = 28 mm
Additional conditions to comply:-
I) T/D £ 0.1 Actual T/D = 14/1224 = 0.011
II) d/D £ 0.5, Actual d/D = 446/1224 = 0.364
The conditions are therefore satisfied.
Max. limit of area of reinforcement:-
a) L1 = Ö (2RT) for the width of reinforcing plate.
b) L2 = Ö( d.Tt ) for the height of ring.
R = Int. radious of spherical part of the dished end = C.R – 1/2T = 995 – 7 = 985.
Tt = Actual thk. of ring = 20 mm.
L1 = Width of compensation = 65 mm.
L2 = Height of M.H. Ring = 85 mm.
: 4 :
Compensation:
a) Comp. available from Comp. Pad
a = 2 x 10 x 50 = 1300 mm2
b = Comp. available from ring.
b = 2 [ (20 – 2.76) 57 + 20 x 28 ] = 3085.36
Total compensation = a + b = 1300 + 3085.36 = 4385.36 mm2
Effective compensation = 4385.36 x 37/47 = 3452.3 mm2
Imaginary dia (d1) = d – A/T = 446 – 3452.3/14 = 199.42
Ratio d1/ÖDT = 199.42/Ö1224 x 14 = 1.52
h/D ratio = 0.193
\ Shape factor (K) as read from fig. 23D = 1.6
\ W.P. of d/e = 2.f. (T – c )/D.K (Regn. 278) = 2 x 11.28 (14 – 0.75)/(1224 x 1.6)
= 0.1526 kg/mm2.
= 15.26 kg/cm2.
\ The selected thk. (16 mm) of d/e is safe for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
: 5 :
b) Side Ring Plates:-
f = 8.88 Kg/mm2 (as calculated earlier)
d = least width of wall header = 168
c = constant = 1 mm.
K = constant = 0.4
W.P = f (t – c)2/d2k = 8.88 (20 – 1)2/(168)2 x 0.4 = 0.2839 kg/mm2
= 28.39 kg/cm2.
Selected thk. of side ring is safe for a W.P. of 10.5 Kg/Cm2(g).
c) Stay Pins:
d = 32
Stress on each stay = 10.5 x 16 x 16 /Õ/4 x (32)2 = 3.342 kg/mm2
= 334.2 kg/cm2
Min. UTS of stay = 37 kg/mm2.
\ Permissible Stress = 0.36 x 37/1.5 = 8.88 kg/mm2
= 888 kg/cm2
Hence, the provided dia (32 mm) is safe for a working pressure of 10.5 kg/cm2(g).
c) Stay Pins:
Stress on each stay = 10.5 x 14 x 14 / Õ/{4 x (32)2} = 2.559 kg/mm2
= 255.9 kg/cm2.
Min. UTS of stay = 37 kg/mm2
: 6 :
\ Permissible Stress = 0.36 x 37/1.5 = 8.88 kg/mm2
= 888 kg/cm2.
Hence, provided dia (32 mm) is safe for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
= 25 Or 27.825
\ b = 25
C1 = Greater of ts + 75 Or dn/2
= 10 + 75 Or 146.36 / 2
= 85 Or 73.18
: 7 :
\ C1 = 85.
Cw = O area of fillet weld
Compensating available = Y = 2 (tn – en) b fn/fs + 2 tn.b. fn/fs + 2 (ts – es) c1 + cw
= 2 (10.97 – 1.80) 25 x 31/(47 + 2 x 10.97)
25 x 31/47 + 2 (10 – 1.45) 85 + 0 = 2117.69 mm2.
Y >X
Therefore, there is no need of extra compensation.
5) W.P. OF TUBES
Min. UTS = 31 kg/mm2
f = 0.36 x 31/ 1.5 Or 31/2.7
\ W.P. = 2fe (t – c) / d – t + c
= 7.44 kg/mm2 Or 11.48 kg/mm2.
C = constant = 0.75, e = weld efficiency = 1.
a) Gen, Roof & Riser:
d = 76.2 mm, t = 3.25 mm thk.
\ W.P = 2 x 7.44 x 1 ( 3.25 – 0.75) / (76.2 – 3.25 + 0.75)
= 0.5047 kg/mm2 = 50.47 kg/cm2
b) Dn. Comer:
d = 114.3, t = 6.02
\ W.P = 2 x 7.44 x 1 (6.02 – 0.75) / 114.3 – 6.02 + 71.92 kg/cm2.
c) Inbed Tubes:
d = 63.5, t = 4.06
\ W.P = 2 x 7.44 x 1 (4.06 – 0.75) /( 63.5 – 4.06 + 0.75)
= 0.8183 kg/mm2 = 81.83 kg/cm2
: 8 :
e) B.E. Riser:
d = 168.3, t = 7.11
W.P = 2 x 7.44 x 1 (7.11 – 0.75) /( 168.3 – 7.11 + 0.75)
= 0.5844 kg/mm2
= 58.44 kg/cm2.
In all the cases the calculated valueis higher than the design value. Hence the proposed
tubes/pipes are safe for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
6. HEATING SURFACE:
Surface area exposed to heat on one side and coming in contact with water on other side are :
Generating, roof, down comer portion of drum, in bed tubes in the furnace.
1) Gen Tubes:
d = 76.2, L = 6050, N = 121
H.S1 = Õ x 76.2 x 6050 x 121 / 106 = 175.245 M2
4) In Bed Tubes:
d = 63.5, L = 2214, N = 43
H.S4 = p x 63.5 x 2214 x 43 / 106 = 18.99 M2
Total H.S = HS1 + HS2 + HS3 + HS4
= 175.245 + 4.727 + 2.188 + 18.99 = 201.15 M2
7. SAFETY VALVE: (Reg.293)
HS = 201.15 M2
Rated Capacity = 30 Kg/Hr/M2
\ E = 201.15 x 30 = 6034.5 kg/hr.
P = 10.5 + 1 = 11.5 kg/cm2
: 9 :
C = 0.1 (for high lift S.V.)
E = CAP \ A = E / c. P. = 6034.5 /( 0.1 x 11.5) = 5247.39
2 x p/4 d2 = 5247.39
\ d = Ö( 5247.39 )x 4 / 2 p = 57.79 mm
2 ½” Safety Valve is adeauate.
Bore of stand pipe = 1.25 x 57.79 = 72.2375 mm.
\ Provided stand pipe = 88 NB. Hence adequate.
( P. SWAIN )
HEADERS
\W.P. = 2 f E (t – c )/D – t + c = { 2 x 7.44 x 0.688 (8.56 – 0.762)} /( 114.3 – 8.56 + 0.762)
= 0.7496 kg/mm2
= 74.96 kg/cm2 (g)
Therefore the thickness of pipe proposed for header is adequate for a W.P. of 12.50 kg/cm2(g)
TUBES
HEATING SURFACE
(P. SWAIN)
Jr. Manager (Q.A)
CALCULATION SHEET
:: 2 ::
WORKING PRESSURE CALCULATION FOR DRUM:
Max. Working Temp.<4540 C.
Min. UTS of Plate = 47 kg/mm2
Stress = Et/1.5 = 0.36 x 47/1.5 = 11.28 kg/mm2
Or F = UTS/2.7 = 47/2.7 = 17.41 kg/mm2
\Min. Stress for calculation = f = 11.28 kg/mm2
:: 3 ::
Comp. plate thk. = 10 mm.
Width of compensation = 50 mm.
Thk. of M.H. Ring = 20 mm.
Height of M.H. Ring below the inside surface of d/e = 28 mm
Height of M.H. Ring above the inside surface of d/e = 52 mm
:: 4 ::
E = 0.95
Te = Equivalent thk. of nozzle for opening of
406 mm at a pressure of 10.5 kg/cm2
c = 0.762
a = 2 x 10 x 50 = 1000 mm2
h/D= 0.244.
Contd….P/5-
:: 5 ::
\In both calculation the value is higher than the proposed working pressure. So the selected thk. of plate i.e. 16 mm is safe &
adequate for a working pressure of
10.50 kg/cm2(g).
Hence the size of side ring (20 mm thk.) is adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
Hence the proposed stay pin is safe and adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
:: 7 ::
Calculation for Stay Pins:
Dia of Stay Pin d = 32
Permissible Stress = 8.88 kg/mm2.
Load Developed - 10.5 x (140)2 = 2058 kg.
Stress on stay = 2058 / Õ/4 (32)2
= 2.56 kg/mm2
= 256 Kg/Cm2.
Hence the proposed size is adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 kg/cm2(g).
\ W.P. = Load / Area = 7141.7 / 160 x 160
= 0.2789 kg/mm2
= 27.89 kg/cm2(g)
Proposed Working Pressure = 10.50 Kg/Cm2(g).
Hence the proposed stay pin is safe and adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 Kg/Cm2(g).
Contd….P/7-
:: 7 ::
Calculation for Compensation of Stubs
(For BE DC) on Drum (Reg. 279)
Compensation Required = x = dn x es
= 97.18 x 5.578 = 542.07 mm2
Let Eqv. Thk. of Nozzle = en
UTS of Nozzle = 47 kg/mm2
\ l = 0.36 x 47 / 1.5 = 11.28 kg/mm2
\ en = (97.18 – 0.762) x 0.105 + 2 x 11.28 x 0.762 / (2 x 11.28 – 0.105)
= 1.216 mm.
Thickness of Shell = ts = 10 mm
b = Least Value of 2.5 ts Or 2.5 tn
= 2.5 x 10 Or 2.5 x 8.56
= 25 Or 21.4
\b = 21.4
C1 = Greater of (ts + 75) Or dn / 2
= (10 + 75) Or 97.18 / 2
= 85 Or 48.59
\C1 = 85
Cw = Agregate area of fillet weld = 2 x (8.56)2 x ½
= 73.27 mm2
fn /ts = 11.28 / 11.28 = 1
Contd….P/8-
:: 8 ::
Compensation = Available = Y = 2 (tn – en)b. fn/tn + 2.tn.b.fn/ts + 2 (tn – en) C1 + Cw
= 2 x (8.56 – 1.216) 21.4 x 1 + 2 x 8.56 x 21.4 x 1 + 2(10 – 5.578) 85 + 73.27
= 1505.7 mm2
Y X
Hence there is no need of extra compensation.
Calculation for Compensation of Stubs (For BER) on Drum (Reg.279)
B.E. Down Comer Stub = B.E Riser Stub = 141.3 OD x 9.53 thk.
I.D. of Drum = 1030 mm.
E = Constant = 1, Eqv. Thk. of Shell = en
Permissible Stress = f = 11.28 kg/mm2, c = constant 0.762
I.D. of Stubs = 141.3 – 2 x 9.53 = 122.24
\W.P. = 2 x f x e (es – c ) / (D + es – c)
= 0.105 = 2 x 11.28 x 1 (es – 0.762) / (1030 + es – 0.762)
\es = (1030 – 0.762) 0.105 + 2 x 11.28 x 0.762 / (2 x 11.28 – 0.105)
= 5.578 mm
Compensation Required = x = dn x en
= 122.24 x 5.578 = 681.855 mm2
Let Eqv. Thk. of nozzle = en
UTS of Nozzle = 47 kg/mm2.
\l = 0.36 x 47 / 1.5 = 11.28 kg/mm2
\en = (122.24 – 0.762) x 0.105 + 2 x 11.28 x 0.762) / (2 x 11.28 – 0.105)
= 1.334 mm
Thickness of Shell = ts = 10 mm.
b = Least value of 2.5 ts Or 2.5 tn
= 2.5 x 10 Or 2.5 x 9.53
= 25 Or 23.825
\b = 23.825
C1 = Greater of (ts + 75) Or dn / 2
= (10 + 75) Or 122.24 / 2
= 85 Or 61.12
\C1 = 85
Contd….P/9-
:: 9 ::
Cw = Agregate area of fillet weld = 2 x (9.53)2 x ½
= 90.82 mm2
fn / ts = 11.28 / 11.28 = 1
Compensation Available = Y = 2 (tn – en )b.fn / tn + 2.tn.b.fn/ts + 2.(ts – es) C1 + Cw
= 2 x (9.53 – 1.334) 23.825 x 1 + 2 x 9.53 x 23.825 x 1 +
2 (10 – 5.578) 85 + 90.82
= 1687.2 mm2
Y X
Hence there is no need of extra compensation.
HEATING SURFACE:
1) Generating Tubes:
d = 76.2
l = 6050 mm
n =81
H.S1 = p x 76.2 x 6050 x 81/ 106
= 117.313 m2
2) Roof Tubes:
d = 76.2
l = 5710
n=6
H.S2 = p x 76.2 x 5710 x 6 / 2 x 106
= 4.101 m2
3) Down Comer Tubes :
d = 76.2
l = 670
n=5
H.S3 = p x 76.2 x 670 x 5 / 106
= 0.401 m2
4) Inbed Tubes:
d = 63.5
l = 2360
n = 38
H.S4 = p x 63.5 x 2360 x 38x 106
= 17.89 m2
5) Part of Drum (quarterly exposed):
d = 1050
l = 1960
H.S5 = p x 1050 x 1960/ 106 x 4
= 1.616 m2
Contd….P/10-
:: 10 ::
Total Heating Surface = H.S1 + HS2 + HS3 + HS4 + HS5
= 117.313 + 4.101 + 0.401 + 17.89 + 1.616
= 141.321 m2
p / 4 d2 = 3123/(0.4 x 11.5)
(P. Swain )
Jr. Manager (Q.A)
Therefore the size of pipes proposed is safe and adequate for a W.P. of 9.0 kg/cm2(g).
( P. SWAIN )
IBR CALCULATION
Drum:
1) Shell : -
Max. Working Temp. 454oC.
Min. UTS of Pl . = 42.19 Kg/mm2(g)
Permissible Stress = f = 0.36 x 42.19/1.5 = 10.12 Kg/mm2(g)
And, f = UTS / 2.7 = 42.19 / 2.7 = 15.62 Kg/mm2
Ligament Efficiency:-
(a) For Down Comer :- d = 76.6, P = 325
E =( P-d)/p =(325 – 76.6)/325 = 0.76
(b) For Roof Tubes : - d = 57.4, P = 205
E =( P-d )/p =( 205 – 57.4) / 205 = 0.72
Taking the minimum of the two, ligament efficiency for further calculations E = 0.72
I.D. of Shell = 1224 – 32 = 1192 mm
Thk. of shell plate = T = 16 mm
W.P. = 2.f.E (T-C) /( D + T-C) Where, C = 0.762 (Constant)
= 2 x 10.12 x 0.760 (16 - 0.762) / (1192 + 16 – 0.762)
= 0.1839 Kg/mm2
= 18.39 Kg/Cm2(g)
Therefore the thickness (16 mm) of shell plate proposed is adequate for a W.P. of 17.5
Kg/Cm2(g).
: 2 :
: 3 :
f = 10.12 Kg/mm2 (For D/E)
E = 0.95
te = Equivalent thk. of nozzle for opening of 406 mm at a pressure of 17.5 Kg/mm2
C = 0.762
W.P. = 2 x f x E (te – c) /( D + t – C)
te =( w.p x d / 2fe – wp) + 0.762
te = ( 0.175 x 406/ 2x10.12x0.95 – 0.175 ) + 0.762
= 4.49 mm
Calculation for Compensation:
(a) Compensation available from Comp. pad = 2 x 65 x 12 = 1560 mm2
(b) Compensation available from Nozzle:-
h = 2 (20 – 4.49) 57 + 20 x 28
= 2888.14 mm2
Total Effective Compensating
a + b = 1560 + 2888.14
= 4448.14 mm2
Effective Compensation = A = (a+b) x UTS of Nozzle / UTS of Pl.
= 4448.14 mm2
Imaginary dia = d1 = d – A/T = 446 – 4448.14 / 14.4 = 137.102
Ratio d1/ DT = 137.102/ 1224 x 14.4 = 1.03
H / D = 0.25
Safe factor ‘K’ as read from fig. 23D of IBR = 1.2
Working Pressure of Dished Ends.
= W.P. = 2 x f x (T-C) / DK (Regn. 278)
= 2 x 10.12 (14.4 – 0.75) /1224 x 1.2
= 196.56 / 1003.2
= 18.80 kg/cm2
Hence the thickness (16 mm) of dished end proposed is adequate for a W.P. of 17.5 kg/cm2(g).
Contd………..P/4-
: 4 :
2) Side Ring:
t = 20, f = 10.08 kg/mm2, d = 118, c = 1, k = 0.4
f = 0.36 x 49.22 / 1.5 = 11.81 kg/mm2
W.P. = f ( t – c)2 / d2k
= 11.81 (20 – 1)2 / (118)2 x 0.4
= 0.7654 kg/mm2
= 76.54 kg/cm2
Hence the size of side ring ( 20 mm thk.) is adequate for a W.P. of 17.5 kg/cm2(g).
Contd………P/5-
: 5 :
Contd……..P/6-
: 6 :
: 7 :
(b) Inbed Tubes:
d = 63.5 , t = 4.06
W.P = 2 x 7.44 x 1 (4.06 – 0.75) /(63.5 – 4.06 + 0.75)
= 0.8183 kg/mm2
= 81.83 kg/cm2(g).
Hence the proposed thickness of tube is safe and adequate for a W.P. of 10.50 Kg/Cm2(g).
: 8 :
b = 40 mm
C1 = Greater of ( ts + 76 ) Or dn / 2
= ( 16 + 76 ) Or 131.78 / 2
= 92 Or 65.89 mm
C1 = 92 mm
Cw = Agregate area of Fillet Weld = 2 x (18.26)2 x ½
= 333.427 mm2
fn / fs = 10.12/10.12 = 1
Compensation Available Y = 2 ( tn - en ) b. fn / fs + 2. tn . b. fn / fs + 2. ( ts – es) C1 + Cw
= 2 x ( 18.26 – 1.91 ) 40 x 1 + 2 x 18.26x 40 x 1
+ 2 ( 16 – 15.25) 92 + 333.427
= 3240.227 mm2
Y X
Compensation Required = x = dn x es
= 109.54 x 15.25 = 1670.485 mm2
Let Eqv. Thk. of Nozzle = en
Contd….P/9-
: 9:
Contd….P/10-
: 10 :
Heating Surface:
1) Generating Tubes:-
d = 76.2, l = 6050, n = 155
H.S. = x 76.2 x 6050 x 155 / 106 = 224.51
Contd…….P/11-
: 11 :
( S. K. MULLICK )
sm
View comments