Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This chapter includes the tables that are used to determine – The Work Preparedness of Newly
Employed BulSU Civil Engineers in Selected Construction Firms Batch 2009 – 2013. The total
number of respondents for this study is 249 and below are the data gathered. This chapter also
includes the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data that are needed in each table.
In Terms of Age
Age of Respondents
79.52
80
70
60
50
40
30 16.87
20
1.2 2.41
10
0
21 - 25 yea rs ol d 26 - 30 yea rs ol d 31 - 35 yea rs ol d 36 - 40 years ol d
Age of Res pondents
Figure 1 presents the data on the distribution of age of civil engineering graduates. Of the 249
respondents, 198 or 79.52 percent fell on the age range of 26-30 years old, 42 or 16.87 percent
were on the age range 31-35 years old, 6 or 2.41 percent were on the age range 36 to 40 years
old, and 3 or 1.2 percent was on the age range 21 to 25 years old. It can be inferred from the
findings that most of the civil engineering graduates were literally at their fairly young adulthood
stage.
Gender of Respondents
34.54%
Ma l e
Femal
65.46% e
In Terms of Gender
As Reflected in Figure 2, of the 249 respondents, 163 or 65.46 percent were males and 86 or
34.54 percent were females. This means that those civil engineering graduates were dominated
by males.
Year Graduated
2013 25.3
2012 14.46
2011 19.68
2010 23.29
2009 17.27
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Yea r Graduated
The participation rate in the survey by respondents’ year of graduation (Figure 3) were as
follows: 2009- 17.27% (43 out of 249); 2010- 23.29% (58 out of 249); 2011- 19.68% (49 out of
249); 2012- 14.46% (36 out of 249); and 2013- 25.30% (63 out of 249).
Figure 4. Frequency Distribution of the Civil Engineering Graduates
0.80%
Bachel or's
Degree
99.20% Ma ster's Degree
As shown in figure 4, 247 or 99.20 percent had done the Bachelor’s degree and 2 or 0.80 percent
had finished the Master’s degree. Some of the graduates are still pursuing further studies at the
time of the survey. The percentage of respondents doing a Master’s degree or a PhD had been
None 25.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Profes s i ona l Exa mi nations Pa s s ed
Figure 5 shows that 183 or 73.49 percent of the respondents passed the Civil Engineering
Licensure Examination, 14 or 5.62 percent of the respondents passed the Master Plumber
Seminars/Trainings Attended
PICE National 20.08
None 53.01
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Tra i ni ngs /Semi na rs Attended
In Terms of
Seminars/Trainings Attended
Figure 6 shows proportion of respondents who attended the most essential seminars for civil
engineers. 50 or 20.08% of the respondents had attended the PICE National seminar, 26 or
10.44% of the respondents attended the PICE National Midyear, 12 or 4.82% of the respondents
attended the ASEP International, 29 or 11.65% of the respondents attended other trainings and
seminars related to their chosen field, and 132 or 53.01% of the respondents did not attend any
seminars or trainings.
Table 1. Frequency Distribution of the Engineering Graduates
In Terms of Employment Data
Table 1 shows the different employment status of the BulSU Civil Engineering Graduates (2009
– 2013). Majority of the respondents fell in having a Regular or Permanent employment status,
Contractual status, having 42 graduates and a percentage of 16.87%. The remaining graduates
8(3.21%), and 5(2.01%) respectively, with a total of 249 respondents. This table depicts that the
BulSU Civil Engineering Graduates (2009 – 2013), have a high rate of finding a stable job.
Number of Years f %
Less than a year 35 14.8
1 year 19 3
2 years 31 8.05
3 years 36 13.1
4 years 40 4
5 years 12 15.2
5 years above 63 5
16.9
5
5.08
26.6
9
Total 23 100
6
Table 2 indicates the civil engineering graduates’ length of service on their current employment.
Only 236 specified their years of service. Out of the 236, 35 or 14.83% are working for less than
a year in their different job placement, 19 or 8.05% are working for 1 year, 31 or 13.14% are
working for 2 years, 36 or 15.25% are working for 3 years, 40 or 16.95% are working for 4
years, 12 or 5.08% are working for 5 years, and a substantial number of 63 respondents or
26.69% are working for above 5 years. The table signifies that it takes time for the civil
engineering graduates to settle for an employment that they are satisfied with.
As shown in Table 3, 224 or 94.92% of the respondents ended up having a job related to Civil
Engineering and a small scale figure of 12 or 5.08% of the respondents are pursuing other
ventures of employment that are not related to Civil Engineering. This only tells that a Civil
Engineer is still in demand on the job market and having a degree in Civil Engineering will still
DESCRIPTION OF EMPLOYER
Type Location Frequency Percentage (%)
Government Agencies National 11 4.95
(DPWH, NIA, DENR) Local 7 3.15
Vertical Construction Firms International 32 14.41
National 15 6.76
Local 23 10.36
Horizontal Construction International 16 7.21
Firms National 6 2.70
Local 11 4.95
Consultancy Firms International 8 3.60
National 7 3.15
Local 9 4.05
Academe Private 2 0.90
SUCs 3 1.35
Other Organizations International 35 15.77
National 20 9.01
Local 17 7.66
TOTAL 222 100.00
Table 4 depicts the distribution of Civil Engineering graduates in terms of the type and location
of their employer. Only 222 out of the 249 respondents have stated their place of employment.
The significant number of the respondents are divided into two types of employer. First is
Vertical Construction Firms, having 32(14.41%), 23(10.36%), and 15(6.76%) of our respondents
based on international, local, and national respectively. Lastly, the other significant number of
20(9.01%), and 17(7.66%) of our respondents based on international, national, and local
respectively. The results show that the majority of the respondents are more interested in working
on a vertical construction firms and that a significant amount of BulSU Civil Engineering
graduates is set to face the global standards (or qualified even) from their employer abroad with a
Table 5 shows the frequency distribution of civil engineering graduates in terms of present
occupation. Most of the engineering graduates were Project Engineers (74 or 31.36%) followed
by Quantity Surveyors (41 or 17.37%), Project Managers (17 or 7.20%), Supervisors (16 or
6.78%) and QA/QC Engineers (16 or 6.78%). Few of them were Office, Design, and Planning
Engineer while some of them choses to be undergraduate civil engineering students’ professors.
Year of experience is an important factor to be called a full pledged professional. One to four
years of experience for the graduates would be good enough as preparation stage to become in
distribution of Civil Engineering graduates in terms of how they find their first job. Most of the
employed engineering graduates found their first job through job ads/announcements followed
by through the help of personal contacts of friends or fellow students. Other ways on how they
found their first job is through the help of family contacts of parents/relatives, side jobs, job fair,
internships, internet, through teaching staff at COE Faculty and those that have not searched for
graduation (64 or 27.10%) period. The board examination for civil engineering hampers most of
the graduates (150 or 63.60%) to work immediately after graduation. It takes almost half a year
for them to prepare before they have given the chance to take the actual board examination being
Reasons (n=12) f %
Did not want job in course related area 2 14.2
9
Lack of career progression 3 21.4
3
Poor working conditions 1 7.14
Other Reasons 6 42.8
No Answer 2 5
14.2
9
Total 14 100
Table 8 shows the frequency distribution of the civil engineering graduates in terms of why they
take job different from the course they studied. Three (3) of the them answered that it’s because
of lack of career progression, two (2) graduates stated that they did not want job in course related
unemployment. Three (3) of the unemployed graduates answered that they are preparing to start
own business. Some of the graduates already established their own construction firm. Only one
(1) unemployed graduate answered that he’s searching for employment and not getting it, and the
their monthly earning on their current job. It shows that 126 or 53.40% of the 236 respondent
earns P40,000.00 above salary every month, while 57 or 24.20% of them are receiving
P20,000.00 to less than P30,000, 45 or 19.10% in P30,000.00 to less than P40,000.00 and least
number of graduates are earning P15,000.00 to less than P20,000.00 with 3.40%. This figure also
shows the frequency distribution of self – employed civil engineering graduates in terms of their
monthly earnings on their current job. 4 out the 8 respondent or 50% of the graduates earn
P20,000.00 to less than P30,000.00, on the other hand P30,000.00 to less than P40,000.00 and
P40,000.00 above earning are both 25%. The study reveal that majority of the graduates are
Category of Company
5.56
Construction Estimating Firm
5.56
Des i gn Cons ul tancy Fi rm
88.89
General Contractor
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Category of Company
Figure 7 shows the frequency distribution of the employers in terms of the category of the
company. Of the 18 companies who responded to the survey, 16 or 88.89% were general
contractors while 1 or 5.56% of the companies are design consultancy firm and construction
estimating firm
Minimum Requirements
Gender of the appl i ca nt 12.12
requirements for the new civil engineering graduates that they will hire. 14 or 42.42% of the
employer responded that the applicant must possess the skills required for the job followed by 11
or 33.33% of them answered that the applicant must be a passer of CE Licensure Examination as
a maximum requirement while 4 or 12.12% of the companies required gender of the applicant
and 1 or 3.03% for the school where the applicant has graduated, must be willing to be assigned
at site, must have a good moral character, and must be knowledgeable in MS Office. The finding
reveals that it is advantageous for the graduates to have a job if he/she have the required skills for