Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Four Ball Tester can be used to determine Wear Preventive properties (WP),
Extreme Pressure properties (EP) and friction behaviour of lubricants (both oils and
greases). The wide acceptance of four ball testing makes it an excellent choice to
benchmark products.
The point contact interface is obtained by rotating a steel ball under load against
three stationary steels balls that secured and placed in triangular pattern within a bath
of lubricant. The torque transferred between the rotating and the stationary balls.
Measurements are taken at the rotating speed, temperature and normal load as specified
by published standard. The normal load, friction force, and temperature can be
monitored using Windows-based Data Acquisition Software. Loads applied for the
wear test producing s circular wear scar on each ball, and the average wear scar diameter
is determined for comparison.
The wear scar diameter on the steel balls are measured using an image acquisition
system to evaluate the relationship between scar diameter and applied load. The size of
the scar shows the ability of the lubricant to prevent wear. A larger diameter indicates
poor wear preventive property while a smaller indicates superior wear preventive
property.
In Extreme Pressure (EP) tests the lubricant is subjected to load that is increased in
specified steps after every run. This increase in loading is continued till a load is reached
where the lubricant fails. The failure of lubricant is indicated by welding of the bottom
three balls to the top ball. The load at which welding occurs is the index of extreme
pressure property of the lubricant. This testing method can used for specification
purposes such as differentiate between lubricating fluids which is having low, medium,
and high level of extreme pressure properties.
A view of the standard testing machine equipped with the data acquisition
system is presented in Figure 2(a). The electrical motor and the belt transmission rotate
the shaft. At the end of the shaft there is a tapered chuck with the clamped upper rotating
ball. The testing device contains the three stationary lower balls placed in a pot and
completely covered by lubricant, in order to assure a lubrication film between the upper
ball and the lower ones. The three ball was locked into based fixture of test machine.
The upper ball which is the fourth ball was locked into drive shaft. Then, grease was
used as a lubricant was poured into based fixture until it covered the whole ball bearing
and was placed on machine as shown in Figure 2(b). The test was started with the test
load of 40kg. The temperature of test grease has been controlled at 75℃ and recorded
by using the control unit and monitor. The test was carried out at constant speed of 1200
rpm. The data such as torque and other necessary data according to the ASTM standard
was controlled and recorded. The running time of the test is 60 minutes. The test
lubricant cup was assembly and chuck were removed. Then, the ball bearing was
discarded. The ball bearing was removed and cleaned with solvent, then wipe with dry
cloth. Finally, the dimension of all the ball bearing scar was measured by using
microscope of image acquisition system as shown in Figure 2(c).
1 1
Base on the Figure 3(a), the two elastic spheres 1 and 2 have radii R1 and R2 will press
into contact with force P. Then, the resultant circular contact area has
3 3𝑃𝑅
𝑅𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑠, 𝑎 = √( )
4𝐸 ∗
𝑎2 3 9𝑃2
𝛿= = √ 2
𝑅 16𝑅𝐸 ∗
Where
a = Sphere Radius
R = Effective Radius
P = Applied Load
E* = Elastic Modulus
Effective Young’s Modulus
𝟏 𝟏 − 𝒗𝟏 𝟐 𝟏 − 𝒗𝟐 𝟐
= ( + )
𝑬∗ 𝑬𝟏 𝑬𝟐
1 1 − 0.2852 1 − 0.2852
=( + )
𝐸∗ 200 × 109 200 × 109
1
= 9.18775 × 10−12
𝐸∗
𝐸 ∗ = 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖𝟖𝟒𝟎𝟓𝟕𝟓𝟖 × 𝟏𝟎𝟏𝟏 𝑷𝒂
Interference
𝟏
𝒂𝟐 𝟗𝑷𝟐 𝟑
𝜹= =( 𝟐)
𝑹 𝟏𝟔𝑹𝑬∗
𝑎2 (2.579829783 × 10−4 )2
𝛿= =
𝑅 6.35 × 10−3
𝛿 = 𝟏. 𝟎𝟒𝟖𝟏𝟏𝟑𝟔𝟓𝟓 × 𝟏𝟎−𝟓 𝒎
Contact Radius
𝟏
𝟑𝑷𝑹 𝟑
𝒂= ( ∗)
𝟒𝑬
1
3(392.4)(6.35 × 10−3 ) 3
𝑎=( )
4(1.088405758 × 1011 )
𝑎 = 2.579829783 × 10−4 𝑚
𝑑 = 𝟓. 𝟏𝟓𝟗𝟔𝟓𝟗𝟓𝟔𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎−𝟒 𝒎
Based on the results that was obtained, two data will be compared between
experimental and calculation data. The experimental average scar diameter is
0.51790mm. While from the calculation, the average scar diameter 0.5159659566mm.
The percentage of error is. 0.3748 %.
Based on the experiment that has been conducted, the experimental average scar
diameter of ball bearings is 0.51790mm. While from the calculation, the average scar
diameter of ball bearings is 0.51597mm with the percentage of error of 0.3748 %.
Then, the interference that was obtained from the calculation is 1.048113655x10-5m.
5) References:
1. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=15391
2. https://www.skf.com/group/products/lubrication-solutions/lubricants/general-purpose-
industrial-and-automotive-nlgi-2-grease/index.html
3. http://www.astmsteel.com/product/52100-bearing-steel-aisi/
4. http://www.fkm.utm.my/~syahruls/publication/9%20JZUS%20Tiong.pdf
5. http://www.nanovit.co.uk/linked/51350.pdf
6. https://www.industrialtechnology.co.uk/products--the-importance-of-bearing-
lubrication.html