Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ity filled with fluid saturated porous medium with nonuni- The unsteady laminar 2D conservative partial differen-
form temperature distribution on both vertical walls was tial equations of momentum and energy in Cartesian sys-
analysed by Sivasankaran et al. [18]. Rahman et al. [19] tem can be written in dimensional form as follows:
reported a numerical study of mixed convection flow in ∂ ū ∂v̄
a channel with a fully or partially heated cavity in pres- + =0 (1)
∂x′ ∂y′
ence of magnetic field effect. It was found that the flow ve-
locity decreases with increase in Hartmann number, and
1 ∂ p̄ ∂2 ū ∂2 ū
(︂ )︂
∂ ū ∂ ū ∂ ū υ
this reduces heat transfer and flow strength. Few of the re- + ū ′ + v̄ ′ = − +υ + − ū
∂t′ ∂x ∂y ρ ∂x′ ∂x′ 2 ∂y′ 2 k
searchers studied thermal radiation in detail [22–25].
(2)
In this article, mixed convection flow in a porous en-
closure with effect of Radiation numerically using MAC
method, in which both top and bottom walls are kept con- 1 ∂ p̄ ∂2 v̄ ∂2 v̄
(︂ )︂
∂v̄ ∂v̄ ∂v̄ υ
+ ū ′ + v̄ ′ = − +υ 2
+ − v̄
stant with cold temperature has been studied. The left and ∂t′ ∂x ∂y ρ ∂y′ ∂x′ ∂y′ 2 k
right walls are partially heated remaining portions are adi- + βg (T − T c ) (3)
abatic. Obtained numerical results are presented graphi-
cally for stream functions and isotherms as well as the Nus-
selt number.
∂2 T̄ ∂2 T̄ 1 ∂q r
(︂ )︂
∂ T̄ ∂ T̄ ∂ T̄
+ ū ′ + v̄ ′ = α 2
+ − (4)
∂t′ ∂x ∂y ∂x ′ ∂y′ 2 ρc p ∂y′
∂u ∂v
+ =0 (7)
∂x ∂y
1 ∂2 u ∂2 u 1
(︂ )︂
∂u ∂u ∂u ∂p
+u +v =− + + − u
∂t ∂x ∂y ∂x Re ∂x2 ∂y2 ReDa
Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of flow configuration (8)
The following central difference formula is used for we can use the discretized temperature equation to get T
the second order derivatives: at next time level (T n+1 ) via the algorithm:
∂2 u ∂2 u
(︂ 2
∂ T ∂2 T
[︂ (︂ )︂ )︂]︂
∇2 u = + ∂T ∂T
∂x2 ∂y2 T n+1 = T n + ∆t. − u +v +χ +
∂x ∂y ∂x2 ∂y2
(23)
1
where χ = Re Pr . Next, we integrate in time by an incre-
u i−1,j − 2u i,j + u i+1,j u i,j−1 − 2u i,j + u i,j+1
∇2 u = + (17) mental step dt in each iteration until the final time t =
∆x2 ∆y2
1.0 is reached. The variables are co-located and plotted.
Applying to the y-direction momentum conservation Modern variants of the MAC method utilize the conjugate
Eq. (9) we have: gradient schemes which solve the Poisson equation. Fur-
Advection term: ther details are provided in Amsden and Harlow (1970). To
confirm mesh independence a grid-independence study
∂(vu) vu1 − vu2
= (18) is conducted. In computational fluid dynamics, we adopt
∂x ∆x
different methods for simulation, among which finite dif-
Here the following notation applies: ference simulation is merely one methodology. Once a
uv1 = 12 u i,j+1 + u i,j . 12 v i,j + v i+1,j
(︀ )︀ (︀ )︀ mesh provides a solution which is invariant with the finer
uv2 = 12 u i−1,j+1 + u i−1,j . 12 v i,j + v i−1,j
(︀ )︀ (︀ )︀ meshes, the coarser mesh can be adopted. This reduces
computational cost but retains the necessary accuracy. Ta-
∂y =
∂(vv) vv1−vv2
∆y
ble 1 shows that accuracy up to three decimal places is
[︀ 1 (︀ )︀]︀2 achieved for Nusselt number at the left wall with a mesh of
vv1 = v i,j+1 + v i,j
[︀ 12 (︀ )︀]︀2 (19) 61 × 61 which is sufficient for heat transfer computations
vv2 = 2 v i,j−1 + v i,j
and therefore this is adopted for all subsequent simula-
The central difference formula for the Laplacian oper- tions.
ator is given by:
∂2 v ∂2 v Table 1: Grid independent study
∇2 v = ∂x2
+ ∂y 2
v i−1,j −2v i,j +v i+1,j v i,j−1 −2v i,j +v i,j+1 (20)
∇2 v = ∆x2
+ ∆y2 Grid size Average Nusselt number (Nu)
21 × 21 0.1500
Effectively the x-momentum equation discretization
31 × 31 0.1525
technique can be summarized as: 41 × 41 0.1554
(︂ 2 51 × 51 0.1587
∂ u ∂2 u
[︂ (︂ )︂ )︂ ]︂
n ∂u ∂u
u = u + dt. − u +v + α1 + − α2 u 61 × 61 0.1592
∂x2 ∂y2
̃︀
∂x ∂y
(21)
where α1 = 1/Re, and α2 = 1/Re.Da. There is a slight modifi-
Furthermore to corroborate the present computations,
cation needed in the y-momentum equation due to the ad-
temperature (isotherms) and streamline distributions for
dition of a new term. Therefore this term must be included
two special cases have been visualized. These replicate
in the discretized equation and we have:
the solutions of Kandaswamy et al. (2008). The equiva-
v=
̃︀ lent Rayleigh number used in (Kandaswamy et al. 2008)
(︂ [︂
∂v ∂v
]︂ (︂ 2
∂ v ∂2 v
)︂ )︂ is merely the product of the thermal Grashof number and
v n + dt. − u +v + α1 2
+ 2 − α2 v + β.T Prandtl number, which has been considered as Rayleigh
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y
(22) number (i.e. Ra = Gr Pr) in present study. Generally very
close correlation is attained, as observed in Figs. 2 and 3
1 1 and confidence in the present MAC computational code is
⧸︁
where α1 = /Re, α2 = /Re.Da and β = Gr
Re2 . It is further
noteworthy that the temperature term T is co-located such therefore justifiably high.
that it coincides with velocity before using it in the above
equation to account for the staggered grid. After ̃︀ u and ̃︀v
are projected to get u and v by Poisson pressure equation
∇.u*
= ∇2 p
dt
lation cells are appeared near the hot region is activated. are distributed within the cavity from the active heating
If Da is increased the primary circulation cell decreases. portion of the side walls. The strength of the isotherms re-
Half of the cavity is occupied by the primary circulation
distorted at the cold top wall of the cavity where as they shown in Figure 8. The mid-plane v-velocity gradually re-
References
[1] A. F. Khudheyer, MHD mixed convection in double lid-driven
differentially heated trapezoidal cavity, International Journal
of Application or Innovation in Engineering and Management,
2015, vol. 4.
[2] GH.R. Kafayati, M.G. Bandpy, H. Sajjadi, and D. D. Ganji, Lat-
tice Boltzmann simulation of MHD mixed convection in a lid-
driven square cavity with linearly heated wall, Scientia Iranica
B, 2012, vol. 19, pp. 1053-1065.
[3] A. Chattopadhyay, S. K. Pandit, S. S. Sarma, and I. Pop, Mixed
convection in a double lid-driven sinusoidally heated porous
cavity, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016,
vol. 93, pp. 361-378.
[4] H. Moumni, H. Welhezi, R. Djebali, and E. Sediki, Accurate
fnite volume investigation of nanouid mixed convection in
Fig. 13: Central line velocity of U for various Da values with two-sided lid driven cavity including discrete heat sources,"
Re = 10, Pr = 0.71, Gr = 105 , Nr = 2 Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015,vol. 39, pp. 4164-4179.
[5] A. Malleswaran, S. Sivasankaran, and M. Bhuvaneswari, Effect
of heating location and size on MHD mixed convection in a lid-
5 Conclusions driven cavity, International Journal of Numerical Methods for
Heat and Fluid Flow, 2013, vol. 23, pp. 867-884.
[6] M. H. Esfe, M. Akbari, A. Karimipour, M. Afrand, O. Mahian,
The numerical study has been analysed on mixed convec- and S. Wongwises, Mixed convection ow and heat transfer in
tion in porous square cavity with central heating of vertical an inclined cavity equipped to a hot obstacle using nanofluids
walls under thermal Radiation. The non-dimensional gov- considering temperature-dependent properties, International
erning parameters that influence the flow and heat trans- Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, vol. 85, pp. 656-666.
fer characteristics are Grashof Number, Reynolds Number [7] Kalla, L., Vasseur, P., Benacer, R., Beji, H., and Duval, R. Dou-
ble diffusive convection within a horizontal porous layer salted
and Radiation Parameter. In view of the computed results,
from the bottom and heated horizontally. International com-
the following findings can be drawn to make a summary munications in heat and mass transfer, 2001, vol. 28(1), pp.1-
as: 10.
[8] K. M. Shirvan, M. Mamourian, S. Mirzakhanlari, and M. Moghi-
1. The heat transfer increases with an increase in the
man, Investigation on effect of magnetic field on mixed con-
Grashof number. Thus, Grashof number plays an im- vection heat transfer in a ventilated square cavity, Procedia
portant role to control heat transfer and fluid flow. Engineering, 2015, vol. 127, pp. 1181-1188.
2. The heat transfer increases with increasing of Darcy [9] Oztop, H.F., Combined Convection Heat Transfer in a Porous
number for high values of Grashof number, the Lid-Driven Enclosure due to Heater with Finite Length, Int.
Comm. Heat Mass Transfer, 2006, 33 (6), pp.772–779.
Darcy number plays a vital role to control fluid flow
[10] Chamkha, A., Hydromagnetic Combined Convection Flow in
and heat transfer. a Vertical Lid-Driven Cavity with Internal Heat Generation
3. Thermal radiation parameter increases with an in- or Absorption, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A, 2002, 41(5),
crease in heat transfer for all values of Grashof num- pp.529-546.
ber. The convection is controlled by thermal Grashof [11] A.J. Chamkha, E. Abu-Nada, Mixed convection flow in a single
number. and double lid driven square cavities filled with water-Al2O3
nanofluid: effects of viscosity models, Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluid,
4. The flow and temperature contours are affected with
2012, 36, 82–96.
Grashof number and thermal radiation. The local [12] R.K. Tiwari, M.K. Das, Heat transfer augmentation in a two-
heat transfer enhancement is observed as the ther- sided lid-driven differentially heated square cavity utilizing
mal radiation increases. nanofluids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2007, 50, 2002–2018.
[13] R. Nasrin, A.J. Chamkha, M.A. Alim, Modeling of mixed con-
vective heat transfer utilizing nanofluid in a double lid-driven
In the present study we consider Newtonian fluid flow chamber with internal heat generation, Inter. J. Numer. Method
with thermal Radiation in porous media within a square Heat Fluid Flow, 2014, 24, 36–57.
enclosure. Furthermore, we study the similar effect on mi- [14] K. Khanafer, A.J. Chamkha, Mixed convection flow in a lid-
driven enclosure filled with a fluid-saturated porous medium,
cro polar regime in different geometries like triangular,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1999, 42, 2465–2481.
skewed and wavy surface enclosures. [15] T. Basak, P.V.K. Pradeep, S. Roy, I. Pop, Finite element based
heat line approach to study mixed convection in a porous
square cavity with various wall thermal boundary conditions, [21] G.K. Batchelor, An introduction to fluid dynamics, Cambridge
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2011, 54 (9-10) , 1706–1727. University Press, 1993.
[16] V. Sivakumar, S. Sivasankaran, P. Prakash, J. Lee, Effect of [22] Sameh E. Ahmed, Ahmed Kadhim Hussein, H.A. Mohammed,
heating location and size on mixed convection in lid-driven I.K. Adegun, Viscous Dissipation and radiation effects on MHD
cavity, Comput. Math. Appl., 2010, 59, 3053–3065. natural convection in a square enclosure filled with porous
[17] S. Sivasankaran, V. Sivakumar, P. Prakash, Numerical study medium, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014, 266, 34-42.
on mixed convection in a lid-driven cavity with non-uniform [23] Tapas Ray Mahapatra, Dulal Pal, Sabyasachi Mondal, Mixed
heating on both side walls, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2010, 53 Convection flow in an inclined enclosure under magnetic field
,4304–4315. with thermal radiation and heat generation, International
[18] S. Sivasankaran, K.L. Pan, Numerical simulation on mixed Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 41, 47-56.
convection in a porous lid-driven cavity with non-uniform heat- [24] G.Palani, K.Y.Kim, Influence of Magnetic field and thermal ra-
ing on both side wall, Numer. Heat Transfer Part A, 2012, 61, diation by natural convection past vertical cone subjected to
101–121. variable surface heat flux, Applied Mathematics and Mechan-
[19] Rahman, M.M.; Öztop, H.F.; Saidur, R.; Mekhilef, S.; Al-Salem, ics, English Edition, 2012, 33(5), 605-620.
K.: Finite element solution of MHD mixed convection in a chan- [25] Tapas Ray Mahapatra, Dulal Pal, Sabyasachi Mondal, Natu-
nel with a fully or partially heated cavity. Comput. Fluids, 2013, ral Convection in a Lif-driven square cavity filled with Darcy-
79, 53–64. Forchheimer porous medium in the presence of thermal radi-
[20] W.M. Rohsenow, J.P. Hartnett, Y.I. Cho(eds). Handbook of Heat ation, International Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2011, 11(3),
Transfer. 3rd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, (1998). 366-379.