Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Researchers:
March 2019
ii
ABSTRACT
(no indention)
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This research could not be accomplished without the help of other people. The researchers
now wanted to show their deepest gratitude and appreciation to these special people:
Sr. Eva R. Aringo, SM, the school principal, for letting the researchers to conduct to the
Grade 11 students and teachers and giving us permit to excuse them during their study time
Grade 11 Students, one of the respondents, for giving their time answering the given
questionnaires and cooperating with the researchers in fulfilling the needed data for their
study.
Teachers, one of the respondents, for also spending their time answering the questionnaire
given and cooperating to the researchers in accomplishing the needed data for their study.
Ms. Clarissa Escasinas, the Practical Research II adviser for guiding us on how to have
valid research and share her peculiar ideas in making the research.
Library Personnel, for allowing the researchers to use the computers or internet as an
Grade 11 Mother Sisters, for allowing the researcher to conduct their research to the
Almighty God, for giving the researchers the wisdom and understanding in order for them
APPROVAL SHEET
Preparedness of the Teachers and Grade 11 Students of the Sisters of Mary School-Boystown Inc.,
Tungkop, Minglanilla, Cebu during the school year 2018-2019” in the Sisters of Mary School-
Boystown, Inc. School Year 2018-2019, prepared and submitted by Mr.Russel Ike Cabrido,
Mr.Joshua Kim Allen Catedral, Mr.Eumer Nuevo, Mr.Mark Philip Ramos, Mr.Jasper Sarda,
Mr.Fel Sinogaya Jr., and Mr.John Vincent JV C. Valenzona, has been examined and accepted for
Adviser
PANEL OF EXAMINEES
Chairman Vice-chairman
Panel member
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………01
Hypotheses………………………………………………………………………………...…..03
Research Instrument…………………………………………………………………………...09
Statistical Treatment……………………………………...……………………………………10
Summary of Findings…………………………………………………………………………
Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………….
vi
Recommendation……………………………………………………………………………..
REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………
APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………………….
1
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
For many years that had been pass, disaster preparedness on earthquake is one of the
essential way to be able to survive in an earthquake. The chance of surviving in an earthquake are
getting low because of lack of awareness on earthquake preparedness most especially in schools.
The Sisters of Mary School-Boystown students somehow change their behavior and attitudes
towards their awareness on earthquake preparedness. Awareness and preparedness are one of the
crucial element in surviving earthquake most especially on students and teachers in schools.
Mary School-Boystown Inc., Tungkop, Minglanilla, Cebu are very important in that certain
institution. Last 2018, the said school experience 4.8 magnitude of earthquake and luckily there is
no further destructions or damages in the earthquake disaster. The earthquake disaster is an inverse
to the typhoons because the PAG-ASA can monitor the movement of the typhoon while the
earthquake can’t be predicted when to come and what time to occur (PHIVOLCS, 2009). Many
countries nowadays are experiencing earthquakes and they experience worst things unlike
The safety of people around us is more important than the wealth we have of what is the
use of our wealth if one of your member would be gone. Life is sacred and we need to protect it
This study aimed to identify and compare the level of awareness on Earthquake
preparedness of Teachers and Grade 11 Students in the Sisters of Mary School-Boystown Inc.,
The researchers wanted to address and seek answers to the following questions:
1. What is the demographic profile of the Teachers in terms of age and years of teaching
Teachers?
4. Is there significant relationship between the age of the teachers and the level of
5. Is there significant relationship between the age of the students and the level of
6. Is there a significant relationship between the years of teaching experience in the Sisters
earthquake preparedness?
Hypotheses
System Theory
Teachers Students
LEVEL OF AWARENESS ON
EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS
There are various theories that suggest the way a person deal with certain disaster such as
conglomeration of interrelated and interdependent parts that is either natural or man-made (System
systems of the earth when one system is destroyed, most of the system will be affected. Earthquake
is one of the result when a certain system will be destroyed it can cause destruction to many lives.
The purpose of the study is to determine the difference between the level of awareness on
Earthquake preparedness of the students and the teachers in the Sisters of Mary School –Boystown,
Inc. Tungkop, Minglanilla, Cebu covering about 194 randomly selected grade 11 students and 53
teachers of the Sisters of Mary School-Boystown, Inc. School Year 2018-2020. The researcher’s
main focus was to determine the level of awareness on Earthquake preparedness of the Grade 11
Students and the Teachers and the sampling technique use is simple random sampling in choosing
the respondents that represent the whole population of the Grade 11 students and Faculty members.
The data needed for the study were gathered utilizing the level of awareness on Earthquake
preparedness using 5-point Likert Scale as the research instrument. 5-point Likert Scale is an
instrument that measure the respondent’s response in the given awareness on Earthquake
preparedness test.
5
-this will really help them again clearer knowledge on what is the differentiate on the level
of awareness on earthquake preparedness between the students and the teachers of the Sisters of
2.School Administration
-this will help them know on what will be the difference on the level of awareness on
earthquake preparedness between their students and teachers so that they could give instructions
3.Teachers
-this will help them to know on what will be their level of awareness on earthquake and
help them gain more knowledge in order for them to be prepared if that disaster occur.
4.Students
-this will help them to know on what will be their level of awareness on earthquake and
help them gain more knowledge in order for them to be prepared if that disaster occur.
5.Sisters
-this will help them in order to guide more the student on how to prepare themselves if that
earthquake occur.
6
CHAPTER TWO
This section provides the related literatures and related studies that are used.
Disaster preparedness provides for the key strategic actions that are used in determining
the level of awareness and earthquake preparedness of the students and the teachers. Disaster
preparedness provides for the key strategic actions that give importance to activities revolving
around community awareness and understanding; contingency planning; conduct of local drills,
Behavioral change created by the preparedness aspect is eventually measured by how well
people responds to the disasters especially earthquake. Disaster response gives importance to
activities during the actual disaster response operation from needs assessments to search and rescue
to relief operations to early recovery activities emphasized. The rehabilitation and recovery priority
area covers areas like employment and livelihoods, infrastructures and lifeline facilities, housing
and resettlement, among others. It is exposed to disasters and hazards due to its geography and
In addition, the Philippines is situated along a highly seismic area lying along the pacific
ring of fire and is highly prone to earthquakes. According to the Philippine Institute of volcanology
tornadoes, blizzards, tsunamis, cyclones, man-made disasters have been in the form of fires,
stampedes, traffic accidents, industrial mishaps. Once a disaster hits an immediate response
involving various agencies and communities is pivotal, which can control emergencies and
respond or even minimize the aftershocks and help people recover from the effects of disaster in
Parker and Handmer (1998) note the importance and role of unofficial or informal
communication of every people which exist within the communities. Tapping new ideas into these
anticipated that utilizing the communicating abilities and young adults will greatly affect the
CHAPTER THREE
Research Methodology
In this study, the researchers used comparative research. Comparative research is the act
of comparing two or more things with a view to discovering something about one or all of the
things being compared (Wikipedia, 2018). This quantitative research focused on the level of
awareness on earthquake preparedness of the students and teachers. Quantitative research focused
on gathering numerical data and generalizing at across groups or to explain particular phenomenon
(Bobbie, 2018). On this study the researchers were tasked to differentiate the level of awareness
In the Sisters of Mary School-Boystown where the study is to be held and conducted to
determine and evaluate the level of awareness on earthquake preparedness. The researchers chose
194 Grade 11 students out of 374 Grade 11 Students and 53 teachers out of 60 teachers to determine
the difference on the level of awareness on earthquake preparedness of the teachers and the Grade
11 students. The researchers used the simple random sampling technique in order to get the
required respondents. Simple random sampling technique is a technique where every member of
the population has an equal chance of being chosen as the respondents of the study.
9
In this study, the respondents were the teachers and the Grade 11 students of the Sisters of
Mary School-Boystown, Inc., Tungkop, Minglanilla, Cebu. First step is to conduct a research on
the 53 teachers using evaluative questionnaire where only 36 questionnaires are being return and
then to the 194 students where 191 questionnaires surpass. The researchers choose the teachers
because they are dealing with the students during class and their family at home. The researchers
also choose the Grade 11 students because they have already this many experiences in
encountering a lot of phenomenon such as earthquake here inside the school, and the researchers
used simple random sampling in choosing the Grade 11 students as a respondents of the study.
Research Instrument
The questionnaire contains the questions on what are the possible thing to do and on what
In this research, the researchers adopted and revised a questionnaire which is called
“awareness on earthquake preparedness questionnaire” and was checked by the research adviser
and validated it. It was also submitted to Ms. Genevieve Sacarez, our former research teacher in
PPITTP (Pananaliksik) and also Ms. Crystal Mae Salazar and Ms. Riza Mae Nuñez, our former
11 students and the teachers of the Sisters of Mary School-Boystown, Inc., the following phases
and stages shown below were pursued by the researchers in gathering the data:
After the researchers developed the instrument, the researchers asked permission from the
school principal to conduct the research to the Grade 11 students and teachers.
After the approval of the letter by the school principal, the researchers administered the
questionnaire to the randomly selected Grade 11 students and all the teachers, and retrieved it
afterwards.
After retrieving the answered questionnaires from the respondents, the researchers
analyzed the data by using the appropriate statistical tools and interpret the data gathered.
Statistical Treatment
In analyzing the data gathered during the data analysis stage. The following statistical tools
Mean
11
– is the average results, can be obtain by dividing the total of all values by the number of
values. It was used to generally obtain the average results of the summation of all the
(March 2019)
Standard Deviation
- is a statistic that measures the dispersion of a data set relative to its mean (Hargrave,2019).
It was used to measure how the scores are centered on the mean score of awareness on
-is one of the measures of correlation which quantifies the strength as well as the direction
of such relationship. It was used to determine the significant relationship between the age
of the students and the level of awareness on earthquake preparedness, the significant
relationship between the age of the teachers and the level of awareness on earthquake
preparedness and the significant relationship between the years of teaching experience of
the teachers and their level of awareness on earthquake preparedness. Retrieved from
Likert Scale
- is a scale used to measure the attitude wherein the respondents are asked to indicate the
level of agreement or disagreement with the statements related to the stimulus objects.
Likert scale was utilized as a method of measuring the respondents response in the given
(March 2019)
12
Scale Interpretation
1 Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 Undecided
4 Agree
5 Strongly Agree
Frequency Count
- is the measure of the number of times that an event occur. It was used to determine the
number of respondents who belong to a particular score from the awareness on earthquake
Percentages
of something there are per 100. Was used to determine the number of ratio of the
CHAPTER FOUR
This chapter presents the quantitative data analysis and the interpretation of the analysis of
Problem 1: What is the demographic profile of the Teachers in terms of age and years of teaching
3%
8% Ages 21-27
6% Ages 28-33
3% Ages 34-39
Ages 40-45
17% 63% Ages 46-51
Figure 4.1 shows the age profile of the teachers where 63% of the respondents are in the
ages 21-27; 17% of the respondents are in the ages 28-33; 3% of the respondents are in the ages
34-39; 6% of the respondents are in the ages 40-45; 8% of the respondents are in the ages 46-51;
and 3% of the respondents are in the ages 52 and above. This indicates that majority of the
6% 7-12 years
13-18 years
8%
19-24 years
72%
25 and above
4.2 shows the years of teaching experience of the teachers where 72% of the respondents
are in the years of 0-6; 8% of the respondents are in the years of 7-12; 6% of the respondents are
in the years of 13-18; 11% of the respondents are in the years of 19-24; and 3% of the respondents
are in the years of 25 and above. This indicates that majority of the teachers’ years of teaching
experience in the Sisters of Mary School-Boystown Inc. are having 0-6 years.
Problem 2: What is the demographic profile of the Grade 11 students in terms of age?
40%
Percentage
30% 27%
20% 16%
9%
10%
2% 1%
0%
Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20
Age
Figure 4.3 show the demographic profile of the students in terms of age where 16% of the
respondents are in the age 15; 46% of the respondents are in the age of 16; 27% of the respondents
are in the age of 17; 9% of the respondents are in the age of 18; 2% of the respondents are in the
age of 19; and 1% of the respondents are in the age of 20. This indicates that majority of
Problem 3: What is the level of awareness on earthquake preparedness of the Grade 11 students?
Teachers?
40%
31%
30%
20%
13%
10%
1% 1%
0%
not at all aware slightly aware about somewhat aware moderately aware extremely aware
about earthquake earthquake about earthquake about earthquake about earthquake
preparedness preparedness preparedness preparedness preparedness
Categories
Figure 4.4 shows the level of awareness on earthquake preparedness of the Grade 11
students wherein 1% of the respondents are not all aware about earthquake preparedness; 1% of
the respondents are slightly aware about earthquake preparedness; 13% of the respondents are
somewhat aware about earthquake preparedness; 55% of the respondents are moderately aware
about earthquake preparedness; and 31% of the respondents are extremely aware about earthquake
17
preparedness. It indicates that most of the Grade 11 students are moderately aware about
earthquake preparedness.
44%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% 0% 3%
0%
not at all aware about slightly aware about somewhat aware moderately aware extremely aware
earthquake earthquake about earthquake about earthquake about earthquake
preparedness preparedness preparedness preparedness preparedness
Categories
Figure 4.5 shows the level of awareness of the teachers wherein 0% of the respondents are
not and slightly aware about earthquake preparedness; 3% of the respondents are somewhat aware
about earthquake preparedness; 53% of the respondents are moderately aware about earthquake
preparedness; and 44% of the respondents are extremely aware about earthquake preparedness.
Problem 4: Is there significant relationship between the age of the teachers and the level of
Figure 4.6:
There is no relationship between the age of the teachers and the level of awareness on
earthquake preparedness. Age of the teachers does not really affect the level of awareness on
earthquake preparedness rather teachers’ life in everyday and their status or some other factors
Problem 5: Is there significant relationship between the age of the students and the level of
Figure 4.7:
There is no relationship between the age of the grade 11 students and the level of awareness
on earthquake preparedness. Grade 11 students’ ages does not imply their level of awareness
because some factors affects their level of awareness are their everyday living and what they use
to do.
Problem 6: Is there a significant relationship between the years of teaching experience in the
Sisters of Mary School-Boystown Inc. of the teachers and their level of awareness on earthquake
preparedness?
Figure 4.8:
There is no significant relationship between the years of teaching experience in the Sisters
of Mary School-Boystown Inc. of the teachers and their level of awareness on earthquake
preparedness. The level of awareness of the teachers does not based on the number of years if
teaching experience of the teachers though we know “Experience is the best Teacher” and also
there are other aspects affect the level of awareness of the teacher not only experience.
Problem 7: Is there a significant difference on level of awareness between the Grade 11 students
T- Degree of Standard
Teachers' Level of
Students' Level of
Figure 4.9:
There is significant difference on the level of awareness between the Grade 11 students
and the teachers. Teachers’ level of awareness has significant difference on the Grade 11 students’
level of awareness on earthquake preparedness since teacher are older enough than students and
teachers has this ability to response quicker than students in every circumstances occur.
20
CHAPTER FIVE
In chapter four of this study the demographic profile of the teachers in terms of age, most
of the teacher ages between 21-27 and the least of the respondents are the teachers ages 39-41while
in the student’s demographic profile in terms of age 27% of the respondents are in the age of 17.
Majority of the respondents are in ages 17 years old. In the demographic profile of the teacher in
terms of years of teaching, the years of teaching experience of the teachers where 72% of the
respondents are in the years of 0-6 and 11% are in the years 19-24 years. Grade 11 students’ ages
does not imply their level of awareness because some factors affects their level of awareness are
their everyday living and what they use to do. Age of the teachers does not really affect the level
of awareness on earthquake preparedness rather teachers’ life in everyday and their status or some
other factors would probably affect their level of awareness. The level of awareness of the teachers
does not based on the number of years if teaching experience of the teachers though we know
“Experience is the best Teacher” and also there are other aspects affect the level of awareness of
the teacher not only experience. Teachers’ level of awareness has significant difference on the
Grade 11 students’ level of awareness on earthquake preparedness since teacher are older enough
than students and teachers has this ability to response quicker than students in every circumstances
occur.
21
Conclusion
Therefore, the level of awareness of the students and the teachers have this big difference.
Teachers has this higher knowledge about earthquake preparedness because they spend their time
mostly on the students where they taught some basic knowledge, they also learn from their past
life. Teachers are old enough to undergo such level of awareness than students who have a many
Recommendation
-must produce some modules related to earthquake preparedness, so that the teachers can
teach the module to the student and the they can be also guided on what they need to do before,
2.School Administration
-must update the evacuation site where student can stay and can be safe after the
earthquake. The school administrator must also inform the teachers on the things they need to do
3.Teachers
-this will help them to know on what will be their level of awareness on earthquake and
help them gain more knowledge in order for them to be prepared if that disaster occur.
4.Students
22
-must apply what they learn from the teachers so that there will be no accident that will
5.Sisters
-must be aware on the proper saving procedure if incase there will be earthquake disaster
that will happen during night time or if the students are in the supervision of the sisters.
6. Future Researchers
- somehow may use this research in enhancement to their study in relation to earthquake
disaster. They can also use this as their bases on the said topic.
23
REFERENCES
• AMA (American Medical Association). The State-Level Economic Impact of Office Based
/state-advocacy-arc/economic-impact-study. Page .
• ASPR (Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response). National Guidance for
/http/reports/documents/capabilisties.pdf .
• Burke RV, Berg BM, Vee P, Morton I, Nager A, Neches R, Wetzel R, Upperman JS. Using
• Devereaux A.V., Dichter J.R., Christian M.D., Dubler N.N., Sandrock C.E., Hick J.L.,
Powell T., Geiling J.A., Amundson D.E., Baudendistel T.E., Braner D.A., Klein M.A.,
Berkowitz K.A., Curtis J.R., Rubinson L. Task Force for Mass Critical Care. Definitive
care for the critically ill during a disaster: A framework for allocation of scarce resources
in mass critical care: From a Task Force for Mass Critical Care summit meeting, January
• Forman-Hoffman VL, Zolotor AJ, McKeeman JL, Blanco R, Knauer SR, Lloyd SW, Fraser
54:189–214. [ PubMed ]
• Goodhue CJ, Burke RV, Chambers S, Ferrer RR, Upperman JS. Disaster Olympix: A
2010;17(1):5–10. [ PubMed ]
• IOM. Crisis Standards of Care: A Systems Framework for Catastrophic Disaster Response.
• IOM (Institute of Medicine) and NRC (National Research Council). From Neurons to
• Lasker RD. Redefining Readiness: Terrorism Planning Through the Eyes of the Public.
2011;23:141–154. [ PubMed ]
.jstor.org/stable/2084615 .
• NCCD (National Commission on Children and Disasters). Report to the President and
Congress. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. [September
.ahrq.gov/prep/nccdreport .
• Neches R, Ryutov T, Kichkaylo T, Burke RV, Claudius IA, Upperman JS. Design and
2009;4(6):309–320. [ PubMed ]
• NLCHP (The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty). Alone Without a Home:
%20Home,%20FINAL1.pdf .
Pediatrics.2010;49(7):686–698. [ PubMed ]
26
• Peek L, Sutton J, Gump J. Caring for children in the aftermath of disaster: The Church of
the Brethren Children's Disaster Services Program. Children, Youth and Environments.
2008;18(1):408–421.
Ferrari M, editors. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 267–284. (Evidence-based resilience
• Phillips RL, Dodoo MS, McCann JL, Bazemore A, Fryer GE, Klein LS, Weitzman M,
Green LA. Report to the Task Force on the Care of Children by Family Physicians.
• Sapienza JK, Masten AS. Understanding and promoting resilience in children and youth.
City, OK: Terrorism and Disaster Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences
• Wright MO, Masten AS, Narayan AJ. In Handbook of Resilience in Children. Goldstein S,
Brooks RB, editors. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 15–38. (Resilience processes in
APPENDICES
Research Proposal
28
APPROVAL SHEET
Earthquake preparedness of the Teachers and the Grade 11 students of the Sisters of Mary School-
Boystown Inc., Tungkop, Minglanilla, Cebu during the School Year 2018-2019” in the Sisters of
Mary School – Boystown, Inc. Tungkop, Minglanilla, Cebu S.Y. 2017-2018, second semester -
final, prepared and submitted by Mr.Russel Ike Cabrido, Mr.Joshua Kim Allen Catedral,
Mr.Eumer Nuevo, Mr.Mark Philip Ramos, Mr.Jasper Sarda, Mr.Fel Sinogaya Jr., and Mr.John
Vincent JV C. Valenzona,, has been examined and hereby recommended for approval and
acceptance and shall be recommended to proceed to the second and the third phase of the research
process.
The following are few suggestions for the revision of the proposal for appropriateness and
difference
Approved and seconded by the member of the Research Council this May 2, 2019.
PERMISSION LETTER
School Principal
Dear Sister,
The Group 3 researcher of Grade 11-C The Sisters of Mary School-Boystown Inc. will conduct
a study entitled “The level of awareness on Earthquake preparedness of Grade 11students and the
teachers of The Sisters of Mary School- Boystown Inc. Tungkop, Minglanilla, Cebu during the
School Year 2018-2019.” This is in partial fulfillment of the Practical Research II. In the
connection of this, we would like to ask your permission to your good office to have data gathering
to 194 Grade 11 students and 53 teachers in the Sisters of Mary School-Boystown Inc.,Tungkop,
Minglanilla, Cebu, during the study period of the students and vacant time for the teachers.
The researchers are hoping for your positive response. Thank you.
Respectfully yours,
Nuevo, Eumer
Sarda, Jasper
Sinogaya, Fel
Noted by:
Pr2 Teacher
Approved by:
School Principal
Permission Letter
(for survey)
33
Survey Instrument