You are on page 1of 4

Branches of Philosophy: and justification of ethical concepts,

and principles.
 Metaphysics (Beings of Beings)
- deals with the fundamental PLATO
questions of reality.
- MIND and MATTER - ‘’ NOTHING we experience in the physical
- ta meta (beyond) ta physika (physical) world
 Epistemology (validity – reliability – extent ) with our five senses is real. REALITY is just the
- deals with nature, sources, limitations opposite.
and It is unchanging, eternal, immaterial, and
validity of knowledge. can be
- How we know what we claim to know? detected only by the intellect. ‘’
- How we can find out what we wish
POLYCARP IKUENOBE
to know?
- How we can differentiate truth from - “we have to CONSIDER and REALIZE our
falsehood? fallibility through the act of questioning.”
 Logic (reasons – lies – fallacies)
- considered as a tool that concerns FILIPINO THINKING
truth
- Filipino generally believes in the innate
and validity of our arguments regarding
goodness of the human being … ethics has an
such objects.
internal code and sanction that flow from within
- TRUTH = IDEAS + OBJECTS
itself.
* Epismology and Logic
- KNOWLEDGE = Opinion, Illusion & Three Dimensions:
Imagination
 Ethics (morals – values – virtues)  Freedom
- is the branch of philosophy that explores  Dignity
the nature of moral virtue and evaluates  Loob
human actions.
- which is concerned with human values Bahala Na
and
- leave everything to God (Bathala) in the
how individuals should act.
vernacular, puts complete trust in the Divine
- TRADITIONAL RELIGION BASED MORALITY ->
Providence; it contains the element of resignation.
PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS
- COURAGE in taking risk
a) Normative Ethics (What is good)
- pertains to certain norms or Values & Thoughts
standards
 COLONIAL MENTALITY
of goodness and badness, rightness
 RESPECT TO ELDERS
or
 BAYANIHAN
wrongness of an act. Moral
 REMEDYO ATTITUDE
framework
 FILIPINO TIME
are used to set standards of morality.
 RELIGIOUS
 FUN-LOVING TRAITS
b) Meta Ethics (What’s your justification
 OVERSENSITIVE
for
 CRAB MENTALITY
claiming in your theory that pleasure
 FAMILY ORIENTED
is good)
- examines the presuppositions,
meanings
Jose Rizal Martin Heideger

- ‘’He who does not know to look back at - “When are no longer identified with the
where he came from will never get to his idea of ourselves, the entire relationship between
destination.’’ subject and object, knower and known, undergoes
a sudden and revolutionary change. It becomes a
Methods of Philosophizing: real relationship, a mutuality in which the object
creates the subject. The knower no longer feels
 Critical Thinking
himself to be independent of the known; the
- analyze > realize > evaluate
experiences no longer feel him to stand apart from
 Empiricism
the experience.”
- is the view that knowledge can be
attained only through sense Self
experience.
 Rationalism - contemplation of the truth
- is the view that knowledge can be
obtained by relying on reason  EXISTENTIALISM
without the ad of the senses. - based in exercising choices and personal
FREEDOM.
Francis Bacon
o the human condition od the relation of the
- if a man will begin with certainties, he shall individual to the world
end in doubt. But if he will be content to begin with
doubts, he shall end in certainties. o the human response to that condition

Abundance o Human freedom

- “ABUNDARE” – “to overflow nonstop” o the significance of truth and decision in the
absence of certainty
- is to EVOLVE into a higher being
o The correctness and subjectivity of life as
- is a choice lived, against abstractions and false
objectification
NOT:
Soren Keirkegaard
- what we gather but what we scatter
- “What I am to do, not what I am to know.
- what we keep but what we give away The things are to understand myself, to see what
God really wishes me to do; the thing is to find a
- what we hold but what we share
truth which is true for me, to find the idea for which I
 Phenomenology can live and die.”
- based on person’s CONSCIOUSNESS.
John – Paul Sartre
- phenomenon – “what it appears”
- “There is no fixed human nature, so we are
REALITY – perceived or understood in the human
free to be what we choose.”
consciousness, and not of anything independent of
human consciousness. Existence

Edmund Husserl - which makes an entity what it is, that


defining characteristics in whose absence a thing
- “I have been through enough torment
would not be itself.
from lack of clarity and from doubt that goes back
and forth. Only one absorbs me: I must win clarity Existence precedes essence
else I cannot live; I cannot bear life unless I can
believe that I shall achieve.”
 Post Modernism - a fallacy in which the argument
- accepted as “not absolute’’ relies on generosity, altruism, or
- Is the view that there are many mercy, rather than on reason.
realities and that these realities are - a specific kind of appeal to
constructed by the many languages emotion in which someone tries to
of the cultures and subcultures that win support for an argument or idea
are now swirl around us. by exploiting his or her opponents
 Analytical Tradition feelings of pity guilt.
- language cannot objectively B. Appeal to Ignorance (Argumentum as
describe truth ignorantiam)
- a fallacy in which a proposition is
- Analytic philosophy is the held to be true just because it has
conviction that to some significant degree, not been proven false or false
philosophical problems, puzzles, and errors are because it has not been proven true.
rooted in language and can be solved or avoided
by a sound understanding of language and careful Example: Lucifer lives in the core of the sun.
attention to its workings. If you want to disprove it then give me a
picture of you inside the solar core.
 Logic
- based on reasoning and critical C. Equivocation
thinking - a fallacy in which two or more
- is the study of the methods and meanings of a word or phrase are
principles used to distinguish correct used.
from incorrect reasoning.
Example: “Who did you pass on the road?”
Argument said the King “Nobody,” said the messenger
“Quite right,” said the King; “this young lady
- A group of statements consisting of saw him too. So of course nobody walks
premises and conclusions of such a type that the slower than you.”
premises are intended to prove or demonstrate the
conclusion. D. Composition
- may be described as reasoning
o Deductive – universal to particular fallaciously from the attributes of the
o Inductive – particular to universal parts of a whole to the attributes of
the whole itself.
What is true and what is right?
Example: Because every part of a certain
ARGUMENTATION - VALIDITY – CONCLUSION = TRUE
machine is light weight, the machine “as a
Albert Einstein whole” is light in weight.

-‘’ Education is not learning the facts, but E. Division


the training of the mind to think.’’ - consists of arguing fallaciously that
what is true of a whole must be true
Fallacies of its parts.

- an incorrect way of reasoning; an Example: Aetas are disappearing. That man


argument that tries to persuade psychologically but is an Aeta.Therefore that man is disappearing.
not logically.
F. Against to Person (Argumentum ad
A. Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad hominem)
misericondiam) - fallacy in which the argument relies
upon an attack against the person
taking a position.
- fallacy attempts to link the validity of a premise to
a characteristic or belief of the person advocating
the premise. However, in some instances, question
of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are
legitimate if relevant to the issue.

G. Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)


- fallacy in which the argument relies
upon an open or veiled threat of
force.

Example: “If you expect to receive


allowance tomorrow, I suggest you don’t talk to
your boyfriend anymore!”

H. False cause (post hoc)

- fallacy in which something that is


not really the cause of something
else is treated as its cause.

Example: Course evaluation forms are now


required in many institutions and salaries are
influenced by the results. When I joined the
University of Michigan 30 years ago, my salary was
higher than that of any member of the
anthropology department who is still active today.
My standards for grading have not followed the
trend toward institution. Students’ complaints about
grades have increased, and now my salary is at
that bottom of the professional list.

I. Hasty generalization
- an informal fallacy in which a
principle that is true of a particular
case is applied, carelessly or
deliberately, to the great run of
cases.

Example: “Take my son, Martyn. He’s been


eating fish and chips his whole life, and he had a
cholesterol test, and his level is below the national
average. What better proof could there be than a
fryer’s son?

J. Begging the question (Petitio principii)


- an informal fallacy in which the
conclusion of an argument is stated
or assumed in one of the premises.

You might also like