Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1
2 LIST OF SYMBOLS, DIMENSIONS AND UNITS .......................................................................... 1
3 DESIGN FORMULAS FOR CHANNEL FLOW ............................................................................. 4
3.1 Manning's formula (Chow, 1959) ................................................................................ 4
3.2 Geometric Sections and Corresponding Formulae ..................................................... 4
4 DESIGN FORMULAS FOR HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES ............................................................. 11
4.1 Design Formulas for Intakes ..................................................................................... 11
4.1.1 OPEN INTAKE (SLUICE) ......................................................................................... 11
4.1.2 PIPE INTAKE ........................................................................................................ 16
4.1.3 BOTTOM INTAKE ................................................................................................... 17
4.1.4 ORIFICE DESIGN................................................................................................... 18
4.1.5 WEIRS................................................................................................................. 18
4.2 Design Formulas for Inlets ........................................................................................ 21
4.2.1 FREE FALL PIPE INLET........................................................................................... 21
4.2.2 SUBMERGED PIPE INLET ....................................................................................... 22
4.2.3 OPEN FLUME INLET .............................................................................................. 22
4.3 Design Formulas for Outlets ..................................................................................... 24
4.3.1 TYPES OF OUTLETS .............................................................................................. 24
4.4 Design Formulas for Culvert ..................................................................................... 25
4.4.1 DISCHARGE FORMULAS ........................................................................................ 25
4.5 Design Formulas for Vertical Falls ............................................................................ 26
4.5.1 DISCHARGE FORMULAS ........................................................................................ 26
4.6 Design Formulas for Spillways.................................................................................. 27
4.6.1 RECOMMENDED DESIGN FLOODS FOR THE SPILLWAYS ............................................ 27
4.6.2 TYPES OF SPILLWAYS ........................................................................................... 28
4.6.3 DISCHARGE FORMULAS ........................................................................................ 28
4.7 Design Formulas for Siphons.................................................................................... 36
4.7.1 TYPES OF SIPHONS .............................................................................................. 36
4.7.2 DISCHARGE OF SIPHON ........................................................................................ 37
4.8 Hydraulic Jump ......................................................................................................... 42
4.9 Entrance Loss Coefficient ......................................................................................... 48
4.10 Maximum Permissible Shear Stresses.................................................................. 49
4.11 Suction Head requirement..................................................................................... 50
4.11.1 PRESSURE PIPE ............................................................................................... 50
4.11.2 INTAKE............................................................................................................. 51
4.12 Flushing Outlets .................................................................................................... 51
List of Figures
List of tables
Table 36: Q-system description and ratings for the input parameters................................... 125
Table 37: Q-System ratings of the excavation support ratio (ESR)....................................... 127
Table 38: support system graph for the Q-system ................................................................ 128
1 INTRODUCTION
This ”Design Handbook” bascially deals with the flow hydraulic and optimum section of water
conveyance system such as pipes and tunnels for hydraulic structures especially in
hydropower, irrigation and pump schemes.
This book consists of 13 chapters which covers the practical aspect of the flow hydraulic and
various design parameters.
Chapter 1 is Introduction
Chapter 2 deals with symbols, dimension, units and manning’s unit
Chapter 3 discusses the design formula for channel flow
Chapter 4 introduces the reader to some design formulas for hydraulic structures
Chapter 5 deals with differnt types of well
Chapter 6 introcuces some design formula for trashrack screen
Chapter 7 discuss the design formula for filter
Chapter 8 is devoted in pipe hydraulic
Chapter 9 deals with pumps
Chapter 10 discusses the powerplant component design concept
Chapter 11 is about electro-mechanical equipments
Chapter 12 introduces rock engineering and design consideration
Chapter 13 explains the clear cover requirement for hydraulic structures
Chapter 14 is Appendices which various graphs and tables are annexed
This book serves as a starting point in understanding flow hydraulics and some design
concepts mostly deal with hydraulics and hydraulic structures.Therefore, the reader should
consult the publications listed in the References for detail study. In most of the chapter,
example problems are used to illustrate the concepts introduced.
Pressure L m
2 Flood Plains
2.1 Pasture no brush
2.1.1 Short grass 0.025 0.030 0.035
2.1.2 High grass 0.030 0.035 0.050
2.2 Cultivated areas
2.2.1 No crop 0.020 0.030 0.040
2.2.2 Mature row crops 0.025 0.035 0.045
2.2.3 Mature field crops 0.030 0.040 0.050
2.3 Brush
2.3.1 Scattered brush, heavy weeds 0.035 0.050 0.070
2.3.2 Light brush and trees, in winter 0.035 0.050 0.060
2.3.3 Light brush and trees, in summer 0.040 0.060 0.080
2.3.4 Medium to dense brush, in winter 0.045 0.070 0.110
2.3.5 Medium to dense brush, in summer 0.070 0.100 0.160
2.4 Trees
2.4.1 Cleared land with tree stumps, no sprouts 0.030 0.040 0.050
2.4.2 Same as above, but heavy sprouts 0.050 0.060 0.080
Heavy stand of timber, few down trees, little undergrowth,
2.4.3 flow below branches 0.080 0.100 0.120
2.4.4 Same as above, but with flow into branches 0.100 0.120 0.160
2.4.5 Dense willows, summer, straight 0.110 0.150 0.200
4 Brick
4.1 Glazed 0.011 0.013 0.015
4.2 In cement mortar 0.012 0.015 0.018
5 Metal
5.1 Smooth steel surfaces 0.011 0.012 0.014
5.2 Corrugated metal 0.021 0.025 0.030
6 Asphalt
6.1 Smooth 0.013 0.013
6.2 Rough 0.016 0.016
3 Dragline-excavated or dredged
3.1 No vegetation 0.025 0.028 0.033
3.2 Light brush on banks 0.035 0.050 0.060
4 Rock cuts
4.1 Smooth and uniform 0.025 0.035 0.040
4.2 Jagged and irregular 0.035 0.040 0.050
where
R= = hydraulic radius, m
A = cross-sectional area of the channel, m2
Pw = wetted perimeter of the channel, m
S = slope of the channel
n = roughness coefficient
Discharge formula
m3/sec -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------(3.2)
, m -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(3.3)
Slope formula
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(3.4)
where
Trapezoidal Parabolic
Formula/Shape Rectangular Circular
(“z”-Side Slope) T-Top width
1 2
Area-“A” b *h (b + zh )h (φ − sin φ )D 2 Th
8 3
Wetter 1 8h 2
Perimeter-“P”
b+2h b + 2h 1 + z 2 2φD b+
3T
Top Width of
Section-“T”
b=T b+2zh 2 h( D − h) T
Hydraulic bh (b + zh)h 1 ⎛ sin φ ⎞ 2T 2 h
⎜1 − ⎟D
Radius-“R” b + 2h b + 2h 1 + z 2 4 ⎜⎝ φ ⎟⎠ 3T 2 + 8h 2
⎛ ⎞
Hydraulic Depth- (b + zh)h 1 ⎜⎜ φ − sin φ ⎟⎟ 2
h D h
“D” b + 2 zh 8⎜ φ ⎟ 3
⎜ sen ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠
Table 5: Allowable Mean Velocities against Erosion or Scour in Channels of various Soils and
Materials
Description v, m/sec
Soft clay or very fine clay 0-2
Very fine or very light pure sand 0.3
Very light loose sand or silt 0.4
Coarse sand or light sandy soil 0.5
Average sandy soil and good loam 0.7
Sandy loam 0.8
Average loam or alluvial soil 0.9
Firm loam, clay loam 1.0
Firm gravel or clay 1.1
Stiff clay soil; ordinary gravel soil, or clay and gravel 1.4
Broken stone and clay 1.5
Grass 1.2
Coarse gravel, cobbles, shale 1.8
Conglomerates, cemented gravel, soft slate, tough hardpan, soft sedimentary rock 1.8 - 2.5
Soft rock 1.4 - 2.5
Hard rock 3.0 - 4.6
Very hard rock or cement concrete (1:2:4 minimum) 4.6-7.6
Table 6: Allowable Side Slopes for Trapezoidal Channels in various Soils (Davis, 1952)
Type of soil z
Light sand, wet clay 3:1
Wet sand 2.5:1
Loose earth, loose sandy loam 2:1
Ordinary earth, soft clay, sandy loam, gravelly loam or loam 1.5:1
Ordinary gravel 1.25:1
Stiff earth or clay, soft moorum 1:1
Tough hard pan, alluvial soil, firm gravel, hard compact earth, hard moorum 0.5:1
Soft rock 0.25:1
Side slope
where:
h = water depth, m
b = bottom width, m
B = surface width, m
P = wetted perimeter, m
R = hydraulic radius, m
A = cross-sectional area, m2
Example 1
A trapezoidal earth channel of 1.5:1 side slopes is to be built on a slope of S = 0.001 to carry
Q = 1.0 m3/sec. Design the channel cross-section such that the hydraulic radius is optimal.
Solution;
Using Figure 1 first we mark off the length of the 1.0 m3 /sec discharge on the edge of a sheet
of paper. Next, keeping the line horizontal we place the paper's edge on the upper graphs,
moving it upward along the corresponding slope S = 0.001 and shape (1.5:1) lines. Where the
distance between the lines equals the discharge length we note the magnitude of the
hydraulic radius R.
R = 0.40 m
v = 0.70 m/sec
A = 1.43 m2
Entering the left bottom graph along the R = 0.40 curve, we find the intercept with the radial
line indicating optimum conditions. In this case for
R = Ropt = 0.40 m
we get
b = 0.50 m
Sanima Hydro and Engineering (P.) Limited 7|P a g e
Design Handbook Compiled and prepared by: Suraj Kumar Shrestha
and
h = 0.82 m
Example 2
Design a channel in firm loam, for a discharge of 1 500 l/sec, at maximum permissible
velocity.
Solution
From Table 3, the maximum allowable velocity in firm loam is v = 1,0 m/sec. From Table 4
assume side slopes of 1.5:1. From Table 2 the roughness coefficient is defined as n = 0.025.
Canal properties
From Table 6
where
φ = velocity coefficient
Hl= contracted water depth, m
b = width of the gate, m
Types of gate φ
Broad crested gate 0.85 - 0.95
Uncrested gate 0.95 - 1.00
H1 = ψ ×a ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.2)
ψ ψ ψ ψ
where
, m -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.4)
where
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.5)
---------------------------------------------------------------------(4.6)
where
k = coefficient (Figure 3)
Q = free discharge, m3/sec (see Equation (4.1))
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.8)
where
Bligh's method
where
C = Bligh's coefficient
HFS-b = difference between the full upstream supply level and the downstream bed level of the
channel
Type of soil C
Soft clay and silt 3.0
Medium clay 2.0
Loam 5.0
Light sand and mud 8.0
Peat 9.0
Coarse grained sand 12.0
Fine micaceous sand 15.0
Example 3
A 3.0 m wide vertical uncrested gate discharges into a feeder channel in which the water level
is 1.2 m. The upstream water level is 2.0 m and the gate opening is 0.70 m. The approach
velocity is 0.75 m/sec. Determine the discharge through the structure and the length of the
required apron.
Observing the location of the point described, we note that the outflow is free. Therefore the
free discharge is obtained using Equation (4.1)
φ = 0.97 and
from Table 7
ψ = 0.628
then
H1 = ψ ×a = 0.628×0.70 = 0.44 m
therefore
where
H0 = 2.03 m
ds = 0
H1 = 0.44 m
then
therefore
Calculating formulas
m3/sec
where
C = discharge coefficient
A = pipe cross-sectional area, m2
h = head, difference in upstream and downstream water surface levels, m
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.10)
where
Protection length on the downstream side is determined from the following formula:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.11)
where
Example 1
Determine the discharge of the intake and the required protection length on its downstream
side with the data below:
D = 45 cm
l = 12.5 m
Ho = 2.0 m
H2 - 1.6 m
Solution
where
From Table 3 the allowable velocity is defined as vs = 0.8 for sandy loam.
Then
therefore
where
L : intake length over the grids (m); extension of
the calculated length by 20% for more security
because of possible partial grid obstruction
B: intake width (m)
Q: design flow (m3/s)
β: grid slope
Assumptions
a : 2 to 4 cm
a/b : 1/3 , 1/2 , 2/3
β: 30° to 45°
where
Q = discharge through orifice, m3/s
C = discharge coefficient
L = width of opening, m
h = head on horizontal center line of orifice, m
Q = CA 2 g∆h ---------------------------------------(4.13)
where
C = discharge coefficient
A = cross-sectional area of orifice, m2
∆h = driving head, m
4.1.5 WEIRS
4.1.5.1 Rectangular Sharp-Crested
Q = CLH 3 / 2
H
C = 3.27 + 0.40
P
where
Q = discharge over weir crest, m3/s
C = discharge coefficient
L = effective length of crest, m
H = depth of flow over the crest, m
P = hieght of weir above the river bed, m
0.385
Qs ⎛ H 2n ⎞
= ⎜1 − ⎟ --------------------------------(4.14)
Q ⎜⎝ H 1 ⎟⎠
where
Q = discharge over wer crest, m3/s
Qs = discharge through submerged weir
N = 3/2 for a rectangular sharp-crested weir and 5/2 for a triangular weir
L = effective length of crest, m
H1 = head upstream, m
H2 = head downstream, m
4.1.5.3 Weirs Not Sharp-Crested
3
⎛ V 2 ⎞2
Q = CL⎜⎜ H + ⎟ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.15)
⎝ 2 g ⎟⎠
where
Q = discharge over weir crest, m3/s
C = discharge coefficient
L = effective length of crest, m
H = depth of flow over the crest, m
⎛V 2 ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = velocity head, m
⎝ 2g ⎠
Figure 4-5: discharge coefficients for vertical-faced ogee-crested weir at design head
Figure 4-6: discharge coefficients for vertical-faced ogee-crested weir other than design head
Figure 4-7: discharge coefficients for ogee-crested weir with sloping upstream face at the
design head
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.16)
where
Example 2
Determine the discharge of the free fall inlet with a diameter of 15 cm if its length is 4.0 m and
the water depth in the feeder channel is 50 cm.
Solution
then
where
C = discharge coefficient
B in cm C
6 to 10 0.0160
10 to 15 0.0164
over 15 0.0166
Example 3
Design an open flume inlet for a discharge of 150 l/sec if the water depth in the feeder canal is
45 cm and 1.50 m in the pond.
Solution
The corresponding width of the throat to the water depth of 150 l/sec is defined from Figure 11.
Sanima Hydro and Engineering (P.) Limited 23 | P a g e
Design Handbook Compiled and prepared by: Suraj Kumar Shrestha
then
B = 30 cm
dg = 0.5×H = 0.5×0.45 = 0.23 m
lc = 0.8×H2 = 0.8×1.50 = 1.20 m
dc = 0.1×H2 = 0.1×1.50 = 0.15 m
The insertion of the stoplogs into the outlet creates over-shot flow conditions. The discharge
formula (neglecting the approach velocity), for over-shot flow is:
where
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.17)
where
Example 4
Determine the emptying time of 2 ha pond having its water depth of 1.5 m if the diameter of the
outlet is 45 cm.
Solution
where
A1 = 2 ha = 20 000 m2
H1 = 1.5 m
H0 = 0
then
The formulas given for pipe intake can be used, but the following entrance friction coefficients
should be used to calculate the discharge coefficient C.
Entrance condition ke
Sharp-edged projecting entrance 0.9
Flush entrance, square edge 0.5
Well rounded entrance 0.08
where
n = roughness coefficient for concrete pipe = 0.012 for corrugated metal pipe = 0.024
Entrance head:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.18)
where
To solve Equation (4.18), it is necessary to try different values of dc and corresponding values
of R until a value is found that satisfies the equation. If the head on a culvert is high, a value of
dc less than the culvert diameter will not satisfy Equation (4.18). This means the flow is under
pressure and discharge can be calculated by submerged discharge formula.
where
The critical depth can be obtained from the formulas (4.4) and (4.5).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.19)
where
Lb = 5 (H×h)1/2 , m ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.20)
where
db = 0.17 (H×h)1/2, m
In case the failure of the dam would create danger to human life or would cause great property
damage, Q0,1% has to be used to design the spillway
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.21)
where
To prevent erosion in the earthen channel the calculated velocity should be less than the
scouring velocity of the material concerned as shown in Table 3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.22)
where
The side channel has to be lined when the valley side has such great gradient that the
calculated velocity in the side channel is higher than the scouring velocity concerned.
Example 5
Design a side earthen channel spillway for a discharge of 12 m3/sec in stiff clay soil if the
gradient of the valley side along the axis of the channel is 4 percent.
Solution
The scouring velocity of stiff clay soil is defined as vs =1.4 m/sec from Table 3.
Considering the channel as an unkempt artificial channel with considerable aquatic growth the
value of n equals to 0.030 from Table 2. The next step is to determine the measurements of the
spillway.
Assuming that the water depth over the crest is h = 0.30 m the length of the crest is determined
by the use of Equation (4.21).
where
vs = 1.4 m/sec
h = 0.30 m
To check the velocity in the channel first the measurements of the channel are defined as
follows:
Assume that the channel has a bottom width of 30 m and its side slope of 1:1 then the normal
water depth can be calculated by the following formula:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.23)
where
with
b = 30 m
z=1
A = 8.6 m2
then
Since this velocity is higher than the scouring velocity, therefore, the channel should be lined or
its gradient can be lowered by some falls. The slope of the bottom in the channel is obtained
from Equation (3.4)
where
where
The velocity of the flow at the toe of the spillway may be computed by
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.25)
where
e = g×q
and
The head loss along the glacis can be determined by the formula
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.26)
where
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.27)
ds = h2 - h3, m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.28)
Example 6
Q = 30 m3/sec
h = 1.0 m
P = 5.0 m
gradient of the glacis = 2:1
n = 0.012
h3 = 1.20 m
Solution
The head loss along the glacis is obtained from Equation (4.26)
where
Q = 30 m3/sec
n = 0.012
l = 11.18 m
then
The velocity of the flow at the toe of the spillway is defined from Equation (4.25)
where
P = 5.0 m
hc = 0.66 m
h0 = 1.63 m
then
now
then
The subcritical conjugate depth in the stilling basin is defined from Equation (4.27)
where
then
1. Circular crest
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.29)
where
h/r 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
C1 1.82 1.78 1.63 1.33 1.12 0.93 0.80 0.70 0.62 0.57
2. Standard crest
3. Flat crest
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.32)
where
C = discharge coefficient
A = cross-sectional area of the throat, m
h = head, m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.33)
where
In order to determine the approximate size of the siphon the value of C can be considered as
follows:
Calculating formulas
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.34)
where
C = discharge coefficient
A = cross-sectional area of the pipe, m2
H = head, m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.35)
where
where
Water temperature °C 10 20 30
0.123 0.24 0.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.37)
where
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.38)
where
v D h
(m/sec) (m) (m)
1.5 0.1 - 0.3 2 D, but min. 0.3
1.5 - 2.5 0.3 - 0.8 1D 0.7
> 2.5 > 1.0 1.7 D 2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.39)
where
-------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.40)
Example 7
Design the siphon shown in Figure 17 for a discharge of 350 l/sec if water temperature is 30°C.
Solution
Considering the designed discharge Q = 0.35 m3/sec the siphon is a large one. The velocity is
calculated by the following formula assuming that its diameter is 400 mm.
As this velocity is higher than the recommended minimum one in Table 14 hence, the selected
diameter is satisfactory.
The next step is to determine the water depth above the entrance of the siphon by using
Equation (4.39)
v = 2.79 m ke = 0.1
then
λ = 0.02
l = l1 + l2 + l3 + l4 + l5 + l6 = 1.80 + 14.0 + 8.70 + 13.0 + 5.0 + 1.50 = 44 m
d = 0.40 m
The allowable suction head of the siphon is obtained if we use Equation (4.36)
where
then
where
then
The allowable downstream head of the siphon is determined from Equation (3.38)
where
then
The design of the siphon is satisfactory because both Heffs and HeffT are below their allowable
values.
where
C = 0.47
A = 0.126 m2
H = 545 - 543 = 2.0 m
then
A hydraulic jump is a sudden rise in water level due to decreasing velocity. In flowing water,
the water before the jump is moving much faster than the water after the jump. When the
velocity of the water decreases to critical flow speed a jump occurs. Above this velocity, the
water is moving too quickly to allow gravity waves to move upstream. At the point where the
water reaches critical flow speed, the gravity waves become unable to move upstream, and
build up at the jump, forming the sudden increase in water level, called a hydraulic jump.
Froude’s Number:
In order for a hydraulic jump to occur, the flow must be supercritical. The jump becomes more
turbulent and more energy is dissipated as Froude’s number increases. A jump can only occur
when the Froude’s number is greater than 1.0. Froude’s number (Fr) is a ratio relating inertia
and gravity forces.
V
Fr1 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.41)
gy1
Where
V=velocity
g=gravitational constant
y=depth of flow in open channel
• In standing waves there is only a slight difference in depths y1 and y2. Near Fr1 = 1.7 a
series of small rollers develops.
• When the Froude’s number is between 1.7 and 2.5, the flow is in the pre-jump condition.
The water surface is quite smooth, the velocity is reasonably uniform, and the energy
loss is low.
• The transition region is when the Froude’s number is between 2.5 and 4.5. An
oscillating action of the jump exists. Each oscillation of the jump produces a large wave
of irregular period that can travel downstream for miles and damage earth banks. It is
recommended to avoid this range of Froude numbers in the design of stilling basins.
• The best range for dissipating energy effectively is with a Froude number from 4.5-9.0.
The jump is well balanced and the action is at its best. Energy losses range from 45%
to 70%.
• Effective, but rough jumps occur at dissipating energy when Froude’s number is greater
than 9.0. Energy losses range from 70% to 85%. Other types of stilling basins may be
more economical.
Reynold’s Number:
When a fluid jet falls vertically at high Reynolds number and strikes a horizontal plate, a circular
hydraulic jump may occur. The fluid is then expelled radially, and the fluid generally thins until
reaching a critical radius at which the depth increases abruptly, causing a hydraulic jump (See
Figure 1). The Reynolds Number (R) is used to determine whether the flow of the fluid is
laminar or turbulent. Flow is turbulent at larger Reynolds numbers and laminar at smaller
Reynolds numbers.
VD DV
R =ρ =
µ v
Where
Example 8
Problem:
Analyze the water-surface profile in a long rectangular channel lined with concrete (n=0.013).
The channel is 10 ft wide, the flow rate is 400 cfs, and the channel slope changes abruptly from
0.0150 to 0.0016. Find also the horsepower loss in the resulting jump.
Solution:
2/3
1.486 ⎛ 10y 01 ⎞
400 = (10y 01 )⎜
⎜ 10 + 2y 0
⎟
⎟
(0.015)1/2
0.013 ⎝ 1 ⎠
y01=2.17 ft (normal depth on the upper slope)
Using a similar procedure, the normal depth y02 on the lower slope is
4.81 ft.
1/3
⎡ ⎛ 400 ⎞ 2 ⎤
1/3 ⎢⎜ ⎟ ⎥
⎛ q2 ⎞ ⎢ ⎝ 10 ⎠ ⎥
yc = critical flow = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = = 3.68 ft
⎝ g ⎠ ⎢ 32.2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣⎢ ⎦⎥
The flow is supercritical (y01<yc) before the break in slope and subcritical (y02>yc) after the
break, so a hydraulic jump must occur.
The depth conjugate to the 2.17-ft normal depth on the upper slope is:
2.17 ⎧ ⎡ 8(40) 2 ⎤
1/2
⎫⎪
y'1 = ⎨− 1 + ⎢1 + 3⎥ ⎬ = 5.77 ft
2 ⎩ ⎣ 32.2(2.17) ⎦ ⎪⎭
Therefore, a jump on the upper slope must rise to 5.77 ft. When the flow enters the lower
slope, the depth would be greater than y02=4.81 ft. A jump cannot occur because the water
surface cannot come down from 5.77 ft to 4.81 ft. The depth conjugate to the 4.81-ft normal
depth on the lower slope is:
4.81 ⎧ ⎡ 8(40) 2 ⎤
1/2
⎫⎪
y'2 = ⎨− 1 + ⎢1 + 3⎥ ⎬ = 2.74 ft
2 ⎩ ⎣ 32.2(4.81) ⎦ ⎪⎭
This lower conjugate depth of 2.74 ft will occur downstream of the break in slope. The water
surface on the lower slope can rise from 2.16 ft to 2.74 ft and therefore, a jump will occur.
The location of the jump (its distance below the break in slope) is:
E1 − E 2
∆x =
S − S0
E1 = 2.17 +
(40 / 2.17 )
2
= 7.45 ft
2(32.2)
E 2 = 2.74 +
(40 / 2.74)2
= 6.05 ft
2(32.2)
1 ⎛ 40 40 ⎞
V= ⎜ + ⎟ = 16.53 fps
2 ⎝ 2.17 2.74 ⎠
1 ⎛ 21.7 27.4 ⎞
Rh = ⎜ + ⎟ = 1.641 ft
2 ⎝ 14.34 15.47 ⎠
⎟ = ⎢ (0.013)(16.53 ) ⎤ = 0.01081
2
⎛ nV ⎞ ⎡
S = ⎜⎜ 2/3 ⎟ 2/3 ⎥
⎝ 1.486R h ⎠ ⎣1.486(1.641) ⎦
7.452 − 6.054
∆x = = 151.8 ft
0.01081 − 0.00160
ANS: Thus, the depth on the upper slope is 2.17 ft; downstream of the break the depth
increases gradually to 2.74 ft over a distance of approximately 152 ft; then a hydraulic
jump occurs from a depth of 2.74 ft to 4.81 ft; downstream of the jump the depth
remains constant at 4.81 ft.
h Lj =
(4.81 − 2.74)3 = 0.1695 ft
4(4.81)2.74
(γ )Qh L 62.4(400)0.1695
ANS: P loss =
j
= = 7.69 hp
550 550
Momentum:
The momentum principle is an important concept in flow problems where we need to determine
forces. Such forces occur whenever the velocity of a stream of fluid changes in either direction
or magnitude. The momentum principle from Newton’s second law states that the sum of the
external forces F on a body of fluid or system S is equal to the rate of change of linear
momentum mV of that body or system. Since the symbols F and V represent vectors the
change in momentum must be in the same direction as the force.
In steady flow, conditions within the control volume do not change, so d(mV)cv/dt=0 Thus, for
steady flow the vectorial summation of all forces acting on the fluid mass in the control volume
is equal to the net rate of outflow of momentum across the control surface.
∑Fx=P1A1–P2A2=ρQ(V2-V1)
So that,
∑Fx= γ hC1A1- γ hC2A2=ρQ(V2-V1)
y1 and y2 are the flow depths before and after the hydraulic jump
q is the flow rate per unit width
The equation relating the depth ration y2/y1 and the upstream Froude number is given by
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.42)
Energy Loss:
The hydraulic jump is nature’s energy dissipation device. A hydraulic jump occurs whenever
fluid transitions from supercritical to subcritical flow. This phenomena is marked by a great deal
of turbulence and consequently, high-energy losses. Since energy losses are non-trivial, they
must be included in the expression that also relates water depths upstream and downstream of
a hydraulic jump. Therefore, the head losses are found by using the momentum balance
equation. Energy losses across a jump can be computed once the depths are known.
The equation that can be used to find the drop in energy for any channel is:
⎛ q2 ⎞ ⎛ q2 ⎞
HL = ∆E = E1 – E2 = ⎜⎜ y1 + ⎟⎟ − ⎜⎜ y 2 + ⎟⎟
⎝ 2 gy12 ⎠ ⎝ 2 gy 22 ⎠
Or
⎛ V1 ⎞ ⎛
2
V ⎞
2
HL = ∆E = E1 – E2 = ⎜ y1 + ⎟ − ⎜ y2 + 2 ⎟
⎜ 2 g ⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ 2 g ⎟⎠
⎝
( y 2 − y1 )3
hL = ; Where hL is equal to the head loss
4 y1 y2
Would you like to see a few examples of the different types of hydraulic jumps? The following
pictures show what a hydraulic jump looks like when one occurs at a base of a dam, at the
water surface when Froude’s number is less than one and one that occurs upstream when
Froude’s number is greater than one.
Where
HL = Head Loss (ft)
Ke = Head Loss Coefficient
V = Velocity in the barrel (ft/s)
g = Acceleration due to gravity
The entrance loss coefficient, Ke, is the head loss term of the energy equation for open-channel
flow. The head loss coefficient is a measure of the efficiency of the inlet to smoothly transition
flow from the upstream channel into the culvert. Although it is typically reported as a constant,
it does vary with flow. Typically, reported Ke values are for near or full flow conditions. Under
fish passage flows, Ke values are often substantially less.
The coefficient can range in value between 0 and 1. Larger head loss coefficients are
associated with increased flow contraction in the inlet zone. Culverts having a width less than
the upstream channel will constrict flow and can create a steep drop in the water surface profile
at the inlet, often resulting in a velocity barrier for fish attempting to exit the culvert.
The entrance loss coefficient is a function of the flow. Coefficients are often supplied by culvert
manufacturers and are for relative depths (headwater depth/culvert rise) of about 1.2, well
above fish passage flows.
Attempts should be made to minimize the head loss at the culvert inlet to improve passage.
Sizing the culvert large enough to avoid constricting the flow will result in a inlet head-loss
coefficient of 0 for fish passage flows. Another means of reducing the head-loss at the inlet is
to build wingwalls to direct the flow smoothly into the culvert.
Bates (1992) suggests that inlet coefficients should not exceed 0.7 for adult salmonid fish
passage, 0.5 for sites with marginal passage conditions, and 0.2 for juvenile salmonid passage.
Table 16: Entrance Loss Coefficients for Pipe or Pipe Arch Culverts
Type of Culvert and Inlet Design Coefficient,
Ke
Concrete Pipe Projecting from Fill (no headwall)
Square cut end 0.5
Socket end 0.2
Concrete Pipe with Headwall and/or Wingwall
Square cut end 0.5
Socket end (grooved end) 0.2
Rounded entrance (radius = 1/12 of diameter) 0.2
Concrete Pipe
Mitered to conform to fill slope 0.7
End section conformed to fill slope 0.5
Beveled edges, 33.7 or 45 degree bevels 0.2
Side slope tapered inlet 0.2
Corrugated Metal Pipe or Pipe Arch
Projecting form fill (no headwall) 0.9
Mitered (beveled to conform to fill slope) 0.7
Headwall or headwall with square edge wingwalls 0.5
End section conforming to fill slope 0.5
Beveled Ring 0.25
Headwall, rounded edge 0.2
R* = u * d -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.43)
ν
Shear velocity:
Figure 4-22: specific (dimensionless) shear stress versus the Reynolds number
Where,
S - Suction head, m
d - Pipe diameter, m
V - Velocity in the pipe, m/s
µ - Co-efficient whose value is 1.8 for Symmetric and 2.2 for Lateral
g - Acceleration due to gravity, m/s2
4.11.2 INTAKE
In order to have votex free intake (for rectangular of square cross-section), the minimum
submergence required is:
S = a * v * d ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.47)
Where,
S = submergence required
V = velocity at intake
a = 0.545 for symmetric flow and 0.725 for asymmetrical flow
The submersion is defined as ht. The following formulas express the minimum values for ht:
KNAUSS:
NAGARKAR:
ROHAN:
GORDON:
Where,
c = 0.7245 for asymmetric approach conditions
c = 0.5434 for symmetric approach conditions
Vc = a d ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.48)
Where
a = 0.55- for particle size d>1mm
a = 0.66-for particle size 1mm>d>0.1mm
a = 0.77-for particle size 0.1mm>d
Velocity in the flushing gallery during the pressurized flow is given by:
V1 = 0.6 2 gh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.49)
V1>Vc
Velocity V1 from the flushing conduct must always be greater than the velocity Vc
Where, f e is the frictional coefficient whose values are different for different cases and it is
calculated individually as in the case of open canal. V and g are velocity of flow canal and
acceleration due to gravity.
fLV 2
hf = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.51)
2 gD
where,
hf - friction loss
1.25n 2
f - friction factor, f = 1
= U.S.Army Corps of Engineering
3
D
L - Length of conveyance
V - Velocity of flow
D - Diameter
g - acceleration due to gravity
f is the dimensionless coefficient called friction factor. It is derived considering the shear
stress of the pipe boundary. Process of obtaining the value of friction factor gradually
developed with time. Most of the formula for obtaining friction factor based on the complex
mathematical approach. Finally in 1944 Moody simplified the mathematical procedure by
reproducing the transition law curve on the standard f − R type diagram with reference to the
effective roughness e and diameter of the pipe.
Following are the Darcy-weisbach friction equaitons for various type of flow:
Example 9
Problem:
A cast iron pipe connects two reserviors. The line is 1200m long and has diamter of 1 m . if it
were to convey 2.5 m3/s, what would be the fricitonal head for this pipe? For this exercise
consider v = 1.14E-06 m2/s.
Solution:
The mean velocity inside the pipe:
Q
V = = 3.18 m/s
A
ƒ = 0.014481
Hazen-Williams C
The Hazen-Williams ”C” may also be entered for the friction factor coefficient. Typical values of
”C” for various materials are as follows:
140 extremely smooth, straight pipes, asbestos cement
130 very smooth pipes, concree, new cast iron
120 wood stave, welded steel
110 vitrified clay, new riveted steel
100 worn cast iron
95 riveted steel after years of use
60-80 old pipes in bad condition
The conversion from Hazen-Williams ”C” to the Darcy Weisbach is given by:
1014.2
f = Re −0.148 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.52)
C D 0.0184
1.852
Where;
C = Hazen-Williams C
D = Pipe diameter
Re = Reynolds number
where;
d = diamter of particle, mm
R = hydraulic radius, m
S = bed slope
Q = CIA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(4.56)
Where
Q = peak discharge
C = runoff coefficient = percentage of rain that appears as direct runoff
I = rainfall intensity, mm/hr
A = drainage area, km
5 DISCHARGE OF WELLS
5.1 WELL TYPES
Figure 5-1: Generalized cross section defining well types
Thiem's method
-------------------------------------------------------------------------(5.1)
where
Dupuit's method
----------------------------------------------------------------------------(5.2)
where
s = drawdown = h0 - hw, m, m
Example 1
Determine the discharge of a well with the diameter of 20 cm and the length of the screen of 30
m if k equals 10 m/day, the thickness of the unconfined aquifer is 40 m and the water table is at
the depth of 6 m below the ground level.
In order to determine the well discharge the approximate value of drawdown is chosen as 4.0
m.
where
s = 4.0 m
k = 10 m/day = 1.2×10-4 m/sec
hence
where
h0 = 34 m
hw = 30 m
rw = 0.10 m
The open area of the screen is assumed as 15 per cent of the total surface area of the screen.
Then the screen entrance area is obtained by
As = 0.15×2rw×π ×Ls
where
Ls = 30 m
now
As = 0.15×2×0.10×3.14×30 = 2.82 m2
The effective open area accounting for blockage by grains is estimated to be 50 per cent of the
actual open area i.e. 1.41 m . Hence the entrance velocity for a discharge of 0.015 m/sec is
defined as
Since ve is equal to the optimum screen velocity, the selected screen is adequate.
Diameter of well:
As this value is almost equal to the pumping rate of 60 m3/sec, hence, the selected diameter of
20 cm is adequate.
Example 2
Design a well for an indoor hatchery with a peak discharge of 700 1/min in an unconfined
aquifer of 20 m. The fluctuation of the water table level is 4.0 m with a maximum level of 3.0 m
below the ground level. Assume the value of k as 100 m/day.
For this discharge the recommended well diameter is 2rw = 0.15 m from Table 20.
Q = ve×Asef
where
Assuming that the screen's open area of 15 per cent is blocked by 50 per cent due to
obstruction by aquifer grains
then
where
k = 1.16×10-3 m/sec
h0 =13 m, considering the minimum water table level
hw =11.5 m
r0 =153 m
rw 0.075 m
Since the calculated discharge is larger than the required one, the above calculations have to
be repeated with a lowered value of the drawdown.
Assume s = 1,0 m
then
This is equal to the peak water demand of the hatchery, hence the tube well with a diameter of
15 cm and a screen length of 10 m as well as a drawdown of 1.0 m yields the required 700
1/min for the hatchery.
Figure 6.1-1: Head loss in screens, values of screen loss coefficient β for various bar shapes
Table 23:Additional trash rack losses for non prependicular approach flows
Example 1
Design a Screen chamber for a pumping station with the following data
Q = 0.50 m3/sec
β = 70°
h = 0.80 m
v = 0.70 m/sec
t = φ 10 mm
b = 2 cm
Procedure:
(i) Head loss of screen
Ks = 1.79
t = 0.01 m
b = 0.02 m
v = 0.70 m/sec
sin β = sin 70° = 0.9397
The width of the pumping chamber is calculated first without any screens as below
now
where
Q = design flow in m3/s
V0 = Mean velocity before trashrack in m/s
β = Bar shape co-efficient
α = Trashrack inclination in degree
t = Width of bar in mm
b = Clear span between bars in mm
Kt = Head loss co-efficient
S = Trash rack area in m2
At the entrance of the intake, a trash rack inclined 60° with the horizontal and is made of
stainless steel flat bars ( b = 12 mm thick) having a width (t) between bars 70 mm, the deisgn
discharge of 3 m3/s, coefficient Kt of 0.8 and mean velocity of 1m/s at the entrace, the
calculated area of trash rack using above equation if found to be 5.07 m2.
Similalry, the headloss in trash rack as computed from the Kirschner equation is as follows
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(7.1)
where
Example 1
Design a filter box of a feeder channel against trash fish for a discharge of 200 l/sec. The
thickness of the filter gravel with average grain size of 7 mm is 35 cm and the head is 30 cm.
Solution
where
A = l×w = 3.0m
L = 0.35 m
Q = 0.2 m3/sec
h = 0.30 m
then
so
Therefore, the required width of the filter box with the selected length of 3.0 m shall be 2.0 m.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.3)
where
Example 1
Determine the discharge of a 200 mm diameter galvanized pipe if the length of the pipe is 1 000
m and the head loss is 5.0 m.
Solution
L = 1 000 m
D = 200 mm
H = 5.0 m
Figure 8-1: Minor losses of valves and fittings to flow of water (Coronel, 1978)
from which
FromTable 25, K for the galvanized pipe of 200 mm in diameter is 476.9 l/sec.
Example 2
Determine the required head loss for a discharge of 50 l/sec in the pipe described in Example
1.
Solution
where
L = 1.0 km
From Table 18
Then
H = 502×1.0×0.0044 = 11.0 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.4)
in which k is the so-called local loss coefficient and v is the velocity in the pipe before the
fixture, unless otherwise specified.
Sanima Hydro and Engineering (P.) Limited 69 | P a g e
Design Handbook Compiled and prepared by: Suraj Kumar Shrestha
he — head loss
fe — entrance loss coefficient
2
V — entrance velocity
V2
hb = K bend * -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.6)
2g
where
hb = bend loss
v = velocity
r = bend radius
d = bottom width or diameter of conveyance system
r/d 1 2 3 5
K bend θ = 20
o
0.36 0.25 0.20 0.15
K bend θ = 45o 0.45 0.38 0.30 0.23
K bend θ = 90o 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30
hc = contraction loss
kc = contraction coefficient
V1 = velocity before contraction
V2 = velocity after contraction
d1 and d 2 = width before and after contraction
2 2
V1 − V2
hse = f s -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.8)
2g
Where,
( V1 − V2 ) 2
hge = f ge -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.9)
2g
Where,
2
V2
hex = f exit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.11)
2g
where,
hf = friction loss
V = velocity in m/s.
R = hydraulic radius in m,
n = Manning’s roughness coefficient, and
L = length of canal in m.
b) Friction loss in length in Turbulent flow using Darcy-Weisbach for pipe friction loss:
λLV 2
hf = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(8.13)
2 gD
where,
hf - friction loss
λ - friction factor, dimensionless coefficient
L - Length of conveyance
V - Velocity of flow
D - Diameter
g - acceleration due to gravity
H L = h f + ht
where,
Pipe diameter (mm) Velocity (m/sec) Pipe diameter (mm) Velocity (m/sec)
25-50 0.60 400 1.25
60 0.70 500 1.40
100 0.75 600 1.60
150 0.80 800 1.90
200 0.90 900 1.95
250 1.00 1 000 2.00
300 1.10 1 200 2.20
where
HSS = suction static head is the vertical distance in metre between the downstream water
surface and the centreline of the pump. It may be either positive or negative, depending upon
the location of the pump centreline with respect to the water surfacesuction velocity head is the
equivalent head through which the water would have to fall to acquire the velocity it has in the
suction.
HDS = discharge static head is the vertical distance in metre between the centerline of the pump
and the point of discharge
If the suction and discharge openings are of equal diameter, the discharge velocity head will be
zero.
Where
where
Specific speed n is a widely used criterion for pump selection. It is the impeller speed
corresponding discharge of 1.0 m3/sec at 1.0 m of head for the most efficient design. The
recommended design range of ns is shown in Table below.
Type of pump ns
Centrifugal pumps radial flow with
narrow impeller 10 - 30
medium impeller 30 - 45
wide impeller 45 - 80
Centrifugal pumps mixed flow 80 -150
Propeller pumps 135 -320
where
To prevent cavitation, the pump should be placed such that the total suction head HST is less
than the head available, based on the local atmospheric pressure minus the vapour pressure of
the water.
where
Efficiency of a pump varies with Q and H. The value is included in the manufacturer's
characteristic curves of the pumps available in pump catalogues, an example of which is shown
in Figure 25.
1 horsepower = 0.7457 kW
(8.5)
Efficiency of the motor depends upon the type of the driven motors as follows:
Where,
Example 1
A pump with the designed arrangement as shown in Figure 24 delivers 175 l/sec. Determine
the total dynamic head and the required brake horsepower.
Solution:
HT = HST + HDT
where
and
The first step is to determine the various heads which are computed as follows:
ke = 5.5
From Figure 30
D = 300 mm
then
hence
HSS = 4.0m
From Figure 30
HDS = 3.0 m
As the discharge and suction pipes have the same diameter, hence
HDV = 0
kv = 0.07
for two 90° bends with R/d = 1
kb = 2×0.53 = 1.06
then
where
γ = 1 000 kg
Q = 0.175 m3/sec
HT = 10.20 m
Sanima Hydro and Engineering (P.) Limited 84 | P a g e
Design Handbook Compiled and prepared by: Suraj Kumar Shrestha
Assuming
then
Example 2
Determine the most economical pipe diameter for the pump station described in Example 1 with
the following data
Rc = US$ 0.07
pa = 10%
Cp = US$ 175
D = 500 mm
Where,
w = Fall velocity
D = Depth of the desanding basin
L = Length of the desanding basin
v = Horizontal transit velocity
Where,
η = Trap efficiency
As = Net surface area
Q = Discharge
w = Fall velocity
Trap efficiency for this method is determined using Camp’s diagram given below.
*
CAMP formula for the settling velocity in a sand trap (Alternate of this graph) is:
ω = ω0 - 0.04 Vmc
where,
Vmc
m/s
ω0
Table 30: Fall velocity of a particle is determined using the table below
Figure 10-5: Chart gives settling velocities of spherical particles with specific gravities S, at
10°C
Trap efficiency of the basin is calculated using Camp’s diagram with respect to the following
two parameters:
w w * As
*
and
u Q
Sanima Hydro and Engineering (P.) Limited 89 | P a g e
Design Handbook Compiled and prepared by: Suraj Kumar Shrestha
where,
u* - Shear Velocity
Q- Design discharge
Shear Velocity is calculated by using Manning’s’ formula for energy gradient Se and Hydraulic
Radius Re
u* = g * Re * S e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.3)
Shield’s diagram is used for the calculation of re-suspension of deposited silts due to
turbulence in the conveyance system.
u *d
Re =
υ
Design concept:
1. The travelling time of a particle through the basin is
tx = L/v
2. The settling time of the same particle is
ty = H/w
Where,
w is the fall velocity of the particle
3. If the particle is to reach the bottom of the basin at point C, the two times tx and ty must
be equal:
L/v = H/w
4. The basin should be not more than 8 times longer than wide. Considering this, the
above formulas and the equation of continuity, we receive the following equation:
8Q
L= ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.4)
w
47The fall velocity w can be obtained from Shield’sgraph, below
5. According to Vischer and Huber, 1982, the critical water velocity can be estimated
using the following formula:
v = 0.44 d ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.5)
Where, d is in mm and the critical velocity is 0.2 m/s for 0.2mm size settling particle.
L= --------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.6)
Bw 2 7.51H
Where,
L = length of the sediment trap in m
B = width of the sediment trap in m (estimated from 4.)
Q = design flow in m3/s
w = fall velocity of sediment particle in m/s (Shield)
λ = 1.55 (coefficient that accounts for the amount of settled particles to those
transported)
v = average velocity through desilting basin in m/s (see 5.)
H = depth of basin in m (without storage depth)
7. The effective depth H becomes (using the equation of continuity):
Q
H=
VB
Alternative
The equation above is used to size pretreatment settling basin surface area. It was derived by
the Washington State Department of Ecology from the Camp-Hazen Equation.
As = -(Qo/w) ( Ln(1-E) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.7)
where:
As = Sedimentation basin surface area (ft2)
E = Trap efficiency; which is the target removal efficiency of suspended solids (set equal
to 90%)
w = Particle settling velocity; for target particle size (silt) use settling velocity = 0.0004
ft/sec (0.0033 ft/sec for I > 75%, where I is percentage impervious area)
Qo = rate of outflow from the basin; which is equal to the water quality volume (WQv)
divided by the detention time (td); use 24 hours.
Example
The 2.5 MW, Sunkoshi Small Hydropower Project two chambered (gravity hydraulic flushing)
settling basin is designed adopting following design parameters:
Designed discharge = 2.7 m3/s
Gross head = 120 m
Settling basin type = conventional type i.e. gravity flushing (intermittent)
Number of chamber = 2
Design discharge, Q = 2.7 m3/s
Minimum particle size = 0.2 mm
Trapping efficiency = 90%
Longitudinal slope = 1 in 100 (V:H)
Calculations
a) Camp method:
Adopted manning’s n = 0.025
Initial assume deptd, d = 3m
Longitudinal slope, S = 1 in 50
v = 0.44 d = 0.2 m
Using Equation 10.3 and manning’s formula, shear velocity is given by;
n*v* g 0.025 * 0.2 * 9.81
u* = 1
= 1
= 0.013m / s
R 6
3 6
From Figure 10-3, the fall velocity (w) of 0.2 mm particle is 0.022 m/s.
8q 8 * 2 .7
L= = = 22.2 m (10 to 20% shall be added extra to incorporate turbulance at
w 2 * 0.022
the inlet of the basin)
Therefore, correction of basin length for turbulence = 30* 22.2 = 6.65 m
Total effective length of the basin, L = 22.2 +6.65 = 28.8 m for each basin
Width of each basin, B =As/L =60/28.8 = 2.09 m
Using Equation 10.1, the depth of each basin is;
L * w 28.8 * 0.022
D= = = 3.17 m
v 0.2
Ratio check
L/B = 13.8
H/B = 1.5
b) Vetters method
From Equation 10.7, the surface area of the basin is:
As = -(Qo/w)* Ln(1-E) = -(2.7/0.02)*(LN(1-0.9) = 310.8 m2 (155.4 m2 @ two units)
Adopted width (B) of each basin, 4.5 m
Length (L) of each basin = As/B = 155.4/4.5 = 34.5 m
Correction of basin length for turbulence = 30* 34.5 = 10.4 m
Adopted effective length of the basin, L = 34.5 + 10.4 = 44.9 m for each basin
Using Equation 10.1, the depth of each basin is;
L * w 31.33 * 0.022
D= = = 4.94m
v 0.2
Ratio check
L/B = 9.98
H/B = 1.1
The design parameters obtained from the Vetters method being conservative, thus adopted in
the design.
10.2 FOREBAY/HEADPOND
A Forebay/head-pond is always loacated after the settling basin however in some case head-
pond can also be incorpated as Forebay. Bascially, the volume of forebay/head-pond should be
suffcient to provide 3 minutes of storage. Depth of forebay/head-pond shall be suffcient for the
genereted down-surge to prevent from vorted free water into the waterways after forebay.
However, there shall be provision of spillway to spill excess flow generated by upsurge due to
load rejection. The size of spillway should be suffcient to spill 2 times the design discharge.
In case of sudden closure, the maximum height of the surge is given by the expression known
as:
E. Feifel’s equation:
2
V2 ⎛V 2 ⎞ V2
∆hmax = + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + 2 × h ----------------------------------------------------------------------(10.8)
2g ⎝ 2g ⎠ 2g
where
V = water velocity (mean velocity of flow)
h = water depth – effective depth
∆hmax = height of the surge
D
Velocity v v 1
v5
1
Headloss h h
hn 2
t t
Wall thickness t 2
n n 5
1
Total weight G G
Gn 5
Sanima Hydro and Engineering (P.) Limited 94 | P a g e
Design Handbook Compiled and prepared by: Suraj Kumar Shrestha
Where,
Ep = 0.49
D = diameter in meter, m
P = turbine rated capacity, kW
H = turbine rated head, m
Q = flow, m3/s
L = length of penstock, m
n = friction factor
V = 0.125 2 gH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.15)
Where,
V = permisble velocity, m/s
H = rated head, m
10.4.2 FOR STEEL-LINED CONDUITS (FAHLBUSCH (1987))
⎛ Q 0.45 ⎞
D = 1.12⎜⎜ 0.12 ⎟ ± 20% deviation -----------------------------------------------------------(10.16)
⎟
⎝ Hn ⎠
Where,
D = diameter of pipe
Q = flow, m3/s
Hn = meters
PR
t= +ε
fη ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.19)
Where,
t = Thickness of pipe shell in cm
Pt = allowable tensile stress, N/mm2
P = Internal pressure in kg/cm2
D = internal diameter
R = Internal radius of pipe in cm
f = Allowable stress in kg/cm2
η = Welding joint efficiency 0.9 – 1.0
ε = Corrosion allowance 0.2 cm
Where,
t = Minimum thickness of pipe shell in mm
D = Internal diameter of pipe in mm
Where,
tmin = minimum thickness in mm and
D = pipe diameter in mm
Minimum Thickness for shipping and Handling: The minimum thickness of the penstock shell
for shipping and handling can be calculated by using following relations:
Where,
tmin = minimum thickness in mm and
D = pipe diameter in mm
Mosony’s recommendations:
• 6 mm for small diameter liners
• 10 mm for large diameter liners
(i) Normal conditions – maximum static head plus pressure rise due to normal operation
Allowable stress = ultimate tensile strength /3 (3)
< 2/3 (0.5) Minimum yield stress
(ii) Intermittent condition – conditions during filling & draining the penstock
Allowable stress = Ultimate tensile strength / 2.25 (2.5)
< 0.8 (2/3) Minimum yield stress
(iii) Emergency condition – gate closure etc
Allowable stress = Ultimate tensile strength / 1.5 (2)
< (0.8) Minimum yield stress
(iv) Exceptional condition – Condition includes malfunctioning of control equipment in the most
adverse manner and shall not be used as the basis of design.
Embedded Penstocks
According to the IS 11639 (PartII) 1986, a penstock may be designed under the following
conditions.
(i) Normal conditions – maximum static head plus pressure rise due to normal operation
Allowable stress = ultimate tensile strength /3
< 0.6 Minimum yield stress
(ii) Intermittent condition – conditions during filling & draining the penstock
Allowable stress = 0.4 Ultimate tensile strength
< 2/3 Minimum yield stress
(iii) Emergency condition – gate closure etc
Allowable stress = 2/3 Ultimate tensile strength
> 0.9 Minimum yield stress
(iv) Exceptional condition
Allowable stress < Minimum yield stress
The factor governing the size of the vents are length, diameter, thickness, and head of water, and
discharge in the penstock and strength of the penstock under external pressure.
The size of the air vent may be determined by the following equation:
3/ 2
Q S ⎛d ⎞
F= ⎜ ⎟ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.23)
750000C ⎝ t ⎠
Where,
F = area of the air inlet, m2
Q = flow of air through inlet, m3/s
S = factor of safety against collapse of pipe, 3 to 4
C = co-efficient of discharge through air vent (0.5 for ordinary type of intake valves
and 0.7 for short air inlet pipes)
d = diameter of pipe, mm
t = thickness of pipe, mm
A certain area of the penstock can remain under the Energy Gradient Line and collapse by sub-
atmospheric pressure. The collapsing depression will be given by:
3
⎛e⎞
Pc = 8825900⎜ ⎟ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.24)
⎝D⎠
where
e = the wall thickness, mm
D = diameter of the pipe, mm
This negative pressure can be avoided by installing an aeration pipe with a diameter in cm
given by:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.25)
Where,
d = diameter of air vent pipe, m
L = Length of air vent pipe, m
P = Rated output (H.P.)
H = Rated head of turbine, m
Where,
Q = flow of air through inlet, m3/s
A = area of the air inlet, m2
P = differential pressure between the atmosphere and in the penstock, kg/cm2
Purposes:
(i) To admit air when gate is closed and the water in the conduit recedes down.
(ii) To exhaust air when the penstock is being filled through bye pass lines to balance the
water pressure on two sides of the gate prior to its being lifted up.
(iii) To control sub-pressures downstream of gate at partial opening.
The requirement for a surge chamber is that the Penstock Time Constant (Tw) should be
smaller than one second. The Penstock Time Constant is calculated as:
Q l
Tw = x∑ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.29)
gxH a
Where
Q = discharge
g = acceleration due to gravity
H = net head
l = length of conduit
a = area of conduit
The size of the surge tank has been determined to satisfy the following conditions:
• Cross sectional area of the surge tank shall not be less than the Thoma cross section
area but shall also be practicle diameter to facilitate construction.
• Adequate freeboard should be provided above (min 2.0 m) and below (min 4.0 m) the
maximum upsurge and minimum down surge.
Design Concept
Undamped oscillation:
1. Instantaneous total closure/opening from the maximum discharge:
l. f
Ymax = vo (m) -----------------------------------------------------------------------(10.30)
g.F
Where
vo = velocity inside the conduit
l = length of conduit
ƒ = area of conduit
F = area of surge shaft
g = acceleration due to gravity
Where
v1 = Q1/ƒ
3. The time of total cycle, i.e. the period of the mass oscillation:
l. f
T = 2π (sec) -----------------------------------------------------------------------(10.32)
g.F
According to the Thoma Formula suggested in case of small oscillations, the limit cross-
sectional area of the surge tank is
l. f
At hom a = n (m2) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.33)
2.g.β .H o
Where
n = factor of safety, 1.5 to 2.0,
vo = velocity inside the tunnel
β = the resistance factor of the tunnel, sec2/m
l = length of tunnl, m
ƒ = tunnel area, m2
Ho = H – βvo2 = net head, m
Damped oscillation:
The Mises equation for obtaining surge value as:
mY – ln (mY + 1) = A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.34)
where, A is intial constant.
g.F
A = 2.β 2 .vo
2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.35)
l. f
Where
vo = velocity inside the tunnel
β = the resistance factor of the tunnel, sec2/m
l = length of tunnl, m
ƒ = tunnel area, m2
F = surge shaft area, m2
The resitance factor of the tunnel neglecting other minor looses is obtained from Manning-
Stricler formula:
l
β= 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.37)
2
k .R 3
Where, k is coefficient of roughness and for concrete lined tunnels Ch. Jaeger proposed the
following “k” values:
For opeining k = 70 to 75
For cloure k = 85 to 95
Mean value k 80 to 82
Where
∆h = water hammer pressure rise
a = wave speed
∆v = change in flow velocity
g = gravitational acceleration
The value of the wave speed, a, is influenced by many factors, some of which cannot be
accurately estimated in a typical pipeline. For an elastic pipe, the wave speed is expressed as
K/ρ
a= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.40)
⎛ KDC1 ⎞
⎜1 + ⎟
⎝ e.E ⎠
where
a = wave speed
K = bulk modulus of the fluid medium
ρ = fluid density
D = pipe diameter
E = modulus of elasticity of the pipe material
e = pipe wall thickness
Wave speed varies on type, shape and material of the conduit (thin walled , thick walled, Rock
tunnels or compositematerials
1. For Thin and Thick Walled Pipes (from V CStreeter, "Fluid Transients*)
Note: The wave speed calculated by formula in Streeter's book is less than value calculated
from the formula quoted in M H Chaudhry's book.
Note: The wave speed calculated by formula in Streeter's book is less than value calculated
from the formula quoted in M H Chaudhry's book.
Where
EC = modulus of elasticity of concrete
ES = modulus of elasticity of steel
Er = ratio of EC/ES
EC = thickness of concrete pipe
AS = Reinforcing steel cross sectional area
lS = spacing of the reinforcing steel
ER may vary between 0.06 to 0.1. Chaudhry suggests a value of ER = 0.05 to allow for cracks
in the rock.
Design Concept
1. Adopt the flow velocity (v) of 0.6 m/s.
Vc = 36 d ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.41)
Where
d = particle diameter, mm
Vc = critical velocity, m/s
3. From table 27, adopt the settling velocity (w) of 5 mm particle i.e w = ~0.55 m/s
4. Cross-sectional area required to trap adopted particle into the gravel trap
Q
A= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.42)
v
Where
A = crossectional area, m2
Q = flow, m3/s
v = settling velocity, m/s
Where
D = depth of the gravel trap, m
B = width of the gravel trap, m
D.Vc
L= (m) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.45)
w
The length of the gravel trap should not be less than 2m.
7. Longitudinal bed slope: the bed slope of the gravel trap should be sufficient to transport
the max particle that entered into the gravel trap. Generally, 1 in 40 or 1 in 50 bed slope
is preferred however, the transport capacity of the gravel trap shall also be checked
using following equation.
d = 11RS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(10.46)
Where
d = particle diamter, m
R = hydraulic radius, m
S = bed slope of the gravel trap
11 ELECTRO-MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTS
This chapter briefly describes some preliminary design rules and some selection criterion of the
electromechanical equipment.
As can be seen from Figures 39 and 40, the main components inside the powerhouse are as
follows:
a. Inlet gate or valve
b. Turbine
c. Speed increaser (if needed)
d. Generator
e. Control system
f. Condenser, switchgear
g. Protection systems
h. DC emergency supply
i. Power and current transformers
Figure 11-1: Powerhosue of Sunkoshi Small Hydropower Plant-2.5 MW, owned by Sanima
Hydropower Pvt. Ltd.
Figure 11-2: Main components inside the powerhouse of Sunkoshi Small Hydropower Plant-2.5
MW
a b c
d e f
g
a) Gate valve, b) turgo turbine and generator, c) control system plus DC supply, d) cooling
water system, e) lightining arrestor (protection system) f) supply transformer and g) Main power
transformer
Figure 11-3: Typical section of powerhouse a) low head, b) high and medium heads
b) Turgo turbine
The Turgo turbine can operate under a head in the range of 50-250 m. Like the Pelton, it is an
impulse turbine, however its buckets are shaped differently and the jet of water strikes the
plane of its runner at an angle of 20º. Water enters the runner through one side of the runner
disk and emerges from the other (figure 43). It can operate between 20% and 100% of the
maximal design flow.
Figure 11-5: Princple of a turgo turbine
The efficiency is lower than for the Pelton and Francis turbines.Compared to the Pelton, a
Turgo turbine has a higher rotational speed for the same flow and head. A Turgo can be an
alternative to the Francis when the flow strongly varies or in case of long penstocks, as the
deflector allows avoidance of runaway speed in the case of load rejection which results low
overpressure surge in pipeline than that can occur with a Francis turbine.
The Cross-flow turbines have low efficiency compared to other turbines and the important loss
of head due to the clearance between the runner and the downstream level should be taken
into consideration when dealing with low and medium heads. Moreover, high head cross-flow
runners may have some troubles with reliability due to high mechanical stress. It is an
interesting alternative when one has enough water, defined power needs and low investment
possibilities, such as for rural electrification programs.
b) Francis turbine
Francis turbines are reaction turbines, with fixed runner blades and adjustable guide vanes,
used for medium heads (25 to 350 m). Water enters in the turbine radially but the outlet is axial
i.e. water enters the turbine by the spiral case that is designed to keep its tangential velocity
constant along the consecutive sections and to distribute it peripherally to the distributor. As
with Peltons, Francis turbines can have vertical or horizontal axis.
Figure 11-7: Francis turbines (vertical and horizontal axis)
Turbine Shaft
Governing Ring
Stay Ring
Labyrinth
Stay Vanes seals
Runner
Lower Cover
Svartisen Power Plant, Norway Draft Tube Cone
Where:
ρ = water specific density, kg/m3
Q = Discharge, m3/s
g = acceleration due to gravity, m/s2
H = net head, m
η = turbine efficiency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.3)
Where
Q = Discharge, m3/s
E = specific hydraulic energy of machine, J/kg
n = rotational speed of the turbine, t/s
11.2.3 CAVITATION
Cavitation is characterised by the cavitation coefficient σ (Thoma's coefficient) defined
according to IEC 60193 standard as:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.4)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------(11.5)
Where
P = atmospheric pressure = 1.01 bar m = 1.01x10^6 m at sea level and 0.65
atm
bar m in 3000 m above mean sea level,
P = water vapour pressure = 800 m
v
3
ρ = water specific density, kg/m
2
g = acceleration due to gravity, m/s
V = outlet average velocity, m/s
H = net head, m
n
H = suction head, m
s
To avoid cavitation, the turbine should be installed at least at the Hs as defined by equation
below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.6)
The Thoma's sigma is usually obtained by a model test, and it is a value furnished by the
turbine manufacturer.
----------------------------------------(11.7)
-----------------------------------------(11.8)
Where
σ = thoma’s sigma
n = efficiency for the Francis and Kaplan turbines
QE
Hn = net head, m
It must be remarked that P decreases with the altitude, from roughly 1.01 bar m at the sea
atm
level to 0.65 bar at 3000 m above sea level. So then a Francis turbine with a specific speed of
0.150, working under a 100 m head (with a corresponding σ = 0.090), that is in a plant at sea
level, will require a setting of
Francis 50
Semi Kaplan 30
Kaplan 15
Pelton 10
Turgo 20
Propeller 75
--------(11.9)
--------(11.10)
--------(11.11)
--------(11.12)
--------(11.13)
------------------(11.14)
------------------(11.15)
------------------(11.16)
------------------(11.17)
11.3.1 PELTON
----------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.18)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.19)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.20)
Where
n = rotational speed in t/s
njet = nozzles number
D1 = diameter of the circle describing the buckets centre line
B2 = bucket width, mainly depending on the discharge and number of nozzles
De = nozzle diameter.
As a general rule, the ratio D1/ B2 must always be greater than 2.7. If this is not the case, then a
new calculation with a lower rotational speed or more nozzles has to be carried out.
11.3.2 FRANCIS
Francis turbines cover a wide range of specific speeds, from 0.05 to 0.33 corresponding to high
head and low head Francis respectively.
Figure 11-10: shows schematically a cross section of a Francis runner, with the reference
diameters D , D and D .
1 2 3
The de Siervo and de Leva and Lugaresi et Massa articles, based on a statistical analysis of
more than two hundred existing turbines, enables a preliminary design of the Francis Turbine.
-------------------------------------------------------(11.21)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.22)
The inlet diameter D is given by equation 6.22 for nQE > 0.164
2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.23)
In the preliminary project phase the runner outer diameter D can be calculated as:
e
---------------------------------------------------------(11.24)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.25)
Examples
The following example will help in understanding the concepts exposed in this chapter and
particularly the use of the specific speed tool.
3
Selecting a turbine to equip a 200-m net head scheme with a nominal flow of 1.5 m /sec. The
powerhouse is located at an altitude of 1000 m over the sea level.
According to Table 28 or to Figure 47 the plot of head and flow falls into the envelopes of a
Francis and a Pelton turbine. The turbine speed is given as a function of n by equation 11.3:
QE
(t/s)
If we select a one nozzle Pelton, the maximum value for n according to Table 31, will be
QE
0.025. The corresponding rotational speed would be 6 t/s = 360 t/min.
As we intend to use direct coupling, the rotational speed has to be synchronous, according to
table 6.5. In this case, we would be obliged to choose a 333 t/min rotational speed (5.55 t/s =
34.87 rad/s).
The main Pelton dimensions according to the equations 11.18, 11.19 and 11.20 would be:
Quite huge dimensions are not very realistic from an economical point of view.
If we now consider a 4-nozzle Pelton, the maximum specific speed (according to equation
11.15) would be:
Using the same calculation as for the one nozzle option, the rotational speed would be 600 rpm
and the corresponding nQE would be 0.042.
The main Pelton dimensions would be D = 0.962 m, B = 0.274 m and D = 0.108 m which are
1 2 e
quite reasonable.
If we now select a Francis turbine, the maximum value of n would be 0.33 (table 6.2). Using
QE
equation 11.3, the corresponding speed would be n = 76.43 t/s or 4'765.8 rpm, which is far from
a realistic synchronous rotational speed. For this reason, we will choose the maximum usual
value, which is 1,500 rpm.
The main Francis runner dimensions according to the equations 11.21, 11.22 and 11.23 would
be:
n = 0.069, D = 0.576 m, D = 1.02 m, σ = 0.0305 and H = 3.21 m which does not need
QE 3 1 s
excavation.
The final choice will be economical. If the flow strongly varies, a 4-nozzle Pelton could be a
good choice. If it is not the case, a 1000-rpm Francis that does not need any excavation could
be the best alternative.
Where
PR = rated power (kW)
Nr = rated speed of motor (rpm)
I = moment of inertia ( kgm2)
12 ROCK ENGINEERING
12.1 OVERBURDERN REQUIREMENT
12.1.1 THE FIRST NORWEGIAN DESIGN CRITERIA
The rule of thumb for planning unclined pressure shaft with inclination varied between 31° to
47° and 45° is more common is:
h = c x H -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.1)
Where,
h = vertical depth of point studied, m
H = static water head at the point studied, m
c = a constant, 0.6 for valley sides with inclination upto 35° and in increased
to 1.0 for valley sides of 60°
When inclination of valley side is direct taken into account while determining overburden:
γ wH
L= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(11.2)
γ r Cosβ
Where,
L = shortest distance between the surface and the point studied, m
β = average inclination of the valley side
γw = density of water
γ = density of rock, 2.2 N/mm2 to 3.5 N/mm2
Where
dmin = shortest distance to surface
γw = density of water = 1,000 kg/m3
γr = density of rock overburden = 2,500 kg/m3
H = water head in tunnel
F = factor of safety = 1.6
β = average incline of hillside from tunnel level and uphill
These two criteria will also determine the adit bulkheads' locations.
Where,
Dt = the diameter or span in tunnel (in meters)
Ideally, the length of bolts should be designed according to the rock mass conditions, especially
regarding their block size. The following expressions have been suggested by Palmstrom
(2000)
⎛ 0.1 ⎞
Length of rock bolt in roof (Lbroof) = 1.4 + 0.16 Dt ⎜1 + ⎟
⎝ Db ⎠
⎛ 0.1 ⎞
Length of rock bolt in wall (Lb wall ) = 1.4 + 0.08( Dt + 0.5Wt )⎜1 + ⎟
⎝ Db ⎠
Where,
Db = the block diameter (in meters)
Wt = the tunnel wall height (in meters)
These above equations are graphically solved in figure below, giving bolts length for roof and
for walls.
Note: the block size to be used is the average block size at the actual location
Example
For tunnel span 9 m, wall height 12 m and block diameter Db = 0.5 m, Lb = 3.1 m in roof and Lb
= 2.8 m in wall (using above figure).
Figure 12-2: Typical applications of spilling (modified from Statens Vegvesen, 1994)
Thumb rule:
12.4 SHOTCRETE
Three differnt types of shotcrete is commonly used:
a) Ordinary shortcrete: Plain shotcrete of about 100 mm thickness
b) Mesh shotcrete: this is produced by first spraying a layer of concrete before installing the
wire mesh with typically 5-6 mm diameter steel bars with second layer (sometimes more
layers) of concrete to cover the mesh.
c) Fibre shotcrete: shotcrete with thin needles of fires of about 20-50 mm long (commonly
used 25-32 mm long). A thickness of 50-100 mm is normally applied. 1 volume % of
shotcrete usually increases the concrete strength of about 85%
A combination of fibre shotcrete along with systematic rock bolting may often used where cast
in place concrete was previously the only alternative.
(½ - 1/3)*h
As can be seen from the Figure 51, the length of the plug (between the entrance of access
tunnel) is normally 10 – 40 m , depnding on the water head and the geological conditions (in
most cases about 4% of the water head). Leakage may occur at the concrete/steel bounday
therfore, very carefull grouting has to be carried out to prevent from leakage.
RQD J r J w
Q= * *
Jn J a SRF
Where
RQD is the Rock Quality Designation
Jn is the joint set number
Jr is the joint roughness number
Ja is the joint alteration number
Jw is the joint water reduction factor
SRF is the stress reduction factor
The Q-value is related to the tunnel support requirement by defining the equivalent dimensions
of the underground opening. This equivalent dimension (De), which depends on the size and
type of excavation, is obtained by dividing the span, diameter or wall height of the excavation
(Dt) by the excavation support ratio (ESR). In formula form this gives:
Dt
De =
ESR
Table 36: Q-system description and ratings for the input parameters
Example
Project Work on geological Investigation of Bogna Hydropower Access Tunnel in Norway for
MSc. in Hydropower, 2006-2008.
The ratings shows that for the access tunnel to the Bogna Hydropowerplant, an ESR of 1.3
should be used (Table 36). Using that the span of the tunnel is 6 meter, the equivalent
dimension De is 4.62 meter. Based on field survey, following parameters are estimated.
Metamorph
Rock type Meta Sandstone Greenstone Phyllite ic Gneiss
Limestone
Tunnel Tunnel
Location Surface 1 Surface 4 Surface 5 Surface 7
0+050m 1+000m
RQD(%) 85 90 100 50 100 100
Jn 6 6 0,5 6 3 4
Jr 1 1 1 2 2 1
Ja 1 1 1 0,75 1 1
Jw 0,66 1 1 1 0,5 1
SRF 1,5 1,5 1 1 1 1
RQD J r J w
Q= * *
Jn J a SRF 6.2 10 200 22.2 33.3 25
Fair- Extremely
Rock class Fair Good Good Good
Good good
Metamorph
Rock type Meta Sandstone Greenstone Phyllite ic Gneiss
Limestone
Tunnel Tunnel
Location Surface 1 Surface 4 Surface 5 Surface 7
0+050m 1+000m
Boundar
Boundary
y of
of
unsuppo
unsupporte Unsupport Unsupporte Unsupp
Required rock support rted- Unsupported
d- ed d orted
systema
systematic
tic
bolting
bolting
1 INTRODUCTION
Indira Sagar Project (District Khandwa) is a multipurpose key project of M.P. on the Narmada
River u/s of Sardar Sarovar Project. It is a very important project since the Projects proposed
d/s of it i.e. Omkareshwar, Maheshwar and Sardar Sarovar would be able to attain their full
potential of irrigation and power generation only after getting regulated releases from ISP.
The ISP project comprises of a 92 m high and 653 m long concrete gravity dam. with a surface
power house of 1000 MW installed capacity (8x125) and a 248.65 km long canal to provide
Irrigation in 1.23 lakh ha of C.C.A in the districts of Khandwa, Khargone and Barwani.
To provide irrigation facilities in 1.23 lakh ha., a lined gravity flow canal offtakes from ISP
reservoir through a 3.4 Km. long Punasa tunnel. The total length of the left bank main canal is
248.65 Km. The main flow canal alignment further passes through 5 tunnels viz Amba,
Ahirkheda, Thikri, Kundiyamal and Gulalnia. It is proposed to irrigate 98768 ha. of land through
flow canal in Khandwa, Khargone and Barwani districts.
3.2 LINING
The structural design of tunnel lining is done as per IS : 4880 Part-IV-1971. The lining design is
considered for very good & good rock strata with a R.Q.D. value ranging from 75% to 90%. The
designed value/s are as follows :
• Thickness of lining for very good strata (RQD > 90%) = 0.20 mtrs. (Theoretical Value)
• Thickness of lining for good strata (RQD 75% to 90%) = 0.31 mtrs. (Theoretical Value)
• Thickness of lining for very good strata (RQD > 90%) = 0.30 mtrs. (Proposed Value)
• Thickness of lining for good strata (RQD 75% to 90%) = 0.31 mtrs. (Proposed Value)
• Grade of Concrete = M 20 Grade
• Stress developed due to Bending Moment, Normal Thrust and Radial Shear are calculated as
per IS : 4880 for tunnel empty & tunnel full conditions and are well within permissible limit.
ROCK BOLTS – 25 mm dia. and 2500 mm in length rock bolts of Fe 415 grade are proposed,
wherever required.
RIBS – Steel Ribs of ISHB 150 of mild steel conforming to IS : 2062 with a wt. 34.6 kg/m are
proposed for a length of the diameter of tunnel at the entrance and exit portal with a spacing of
1.0 mtr.
Intake
Clear cover Descriptions
Inside wall (in case of no
Baseslab (bottom second
75 mm Riverside wall steel lining or hard stone
and outer layer)
lining)
Inside wall (in case of steel
50 mm - Hillside wall
lining)
Topslab (top second and
40 mm - -
outer layer)
Intake culvert/canal
Clear cover Descriptions
Baseslab (bottom outer Riverside walls (in case
75 mm -
layer) of contact with river)
Baseslab (bottom second
50 mm Inner walls -
layer)
Riverside walls (in case of Topslab (top second and
40 mm Hillside walls
no contact with river) outer layer)
Gravel Trap
Clear cover Descriptions
Baseslab (bottom outer Riverside walls (in case
75 mm -
layer) of contact with river)
Riverside and hillside walls
Baseslab (bottom second
50 mm Inner walls (in case of no contact with
layer)
river)
Topslab (top second and
40 mm - -
outer layer)
Settling Basin
Clear cover Descriptions
Baseslab (bottom outer Riverside walls (in case
75 mm -
layer) of contact with river)
Riverside and hillside walls
Baseslab (bottom second
50 mm Inner walls (in case of no contact with
layer)
river)
Topslab (top second and
40 mm - -
outer layer)
Approach Canal
Clear cover Descriptions
75 mm - - -
50 mm - - -
Baseslab (bottom outer and Riverside and hillside Topslab (top second and
40 mm
second layer) walls outer layer)
NOTE: Until unless mentioned, 75mm thick C15 concrete shall be used for blinding.
14 APPENDICES
14.1 HYDRAULIC JUMP
Modulus of
Pipe Material Roughness (mm) Poisson's Ratio
Elasticity (GPa)
0.5 (smooth)
Steel 200 - 212 2.6 ( light rust) 0.28
10 (heavily scaled)
Ductile Iron 170 1.5 0.21-0.30
Spun Concrete 14 - 30 0.19 0.1-0.3
Trowelled 14 - 30 0.28
Asbestos Cement 23 0.28 0.36
Plastics
HD Polyethylene 0.93 0.13 0.46
Medium Density PE 0.2 0.13 0.46
PVC rigid 2.4 - 2.75 0.13 0.46
Nylon 1.4 - 2.75 0.13 0.46
Copper 107 - 131 0.34-0.37
Cast Iron 80 - 170 1.5 0.25
Cast Iron with
0.5 0.25
bitumen layer
Rocks
Granite 50 0.28
Limestone 55 0.21
Sandstone 2.75 - 4.8 0.28
Schist 6.5 - 18.6
2. http://www.martindalecenter.com/Calculators4_B_GeoT.html
3. http://web.mst.edu/~mecmovie/index.html
4. http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/geology/geoman.html - manual
REFERENCES:
1. Applied Hydraulic Transients, M H CHaudhry
2. BS Codes
3. Civil works guideline for Micro-Hydropower in Nepal, Practical Action Nepal, second
edition 2009.
4. Design of Small Dam, USBR
5. Finnemore, John E. and Joseph B. Franzini. Fluid Mechanics with Engineering
Applications. 10th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
6. Guide on How to Develop a Small Hydropower Plant, ESHA 2004
7. High-head Power Plants;Emil Mosonyi
8. http://taylor.math.ualberta.ca/~bruce/imagelinks/teaching/hydjump.pdf
9. http://www.esba.be
10. http://www.metzgerwillard.com
11. http://www.rockmass.net
12. Hydraulic design criteria by Corps of Engineers
13. Project Work of TGB5100 Rock Mechanics Advanced Course at NTNU by Ali
Wondwosen B, Hui Lu, Sanne Brinkman, Suraj Kumar Shrestha, October 2007.
14. Rock Engineering by Bjorn Nilsen and Alf Thidemann, NTNU 1993.
15. Standardization of civil engineering works of small hydropower plants and development
of an optimization tool; Mohammadreza Andaroodi, Laboratory of Hydraulic onstructions
(LCH), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland.
16. Underground Powerhouse and high pressure tunnels by Sverr Edvardsson and Einar
Broch, NTNU 2002.