Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/334040846
CITATIONS READS
0 56
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hsuan-Teh Hu on 04 July 2019.
In the ATENA program, the crack-opening law shown direction. The two crack models in the ATENA program
in Figure 3 uses an exponential function based on the consist of fixed and rotated cracks. In the fixed crack
study conducted by Hordijk [28]. For the condition of (Figure 5), the crack direction is identical to the
compression after peak stress, a simulated principal strain direction and changes due to
compression model is used as a basic assumption, directional changes of the strain. Meanwhile, the steel
adopted from the study conducted by Van Mier [29]. reinforcement constitutive model is based on bilinear
It is shown in Figure 4 that the tension failure is localized and multilinear laws as shown in Figure 6.
in the plane perpendicular to the principal stress
(a)
(b)
Figure 6 Stress–strain law for steel reinforcement: (a) bilinear stress–strain law; (b) multilinear stress–strain law
2.2 Specimen Model compression block in which both being bonded with
mortar. The wire rope consists of six typical helical
The specimen model analyzed is in the form of T- strands laid over a central core containing smaller
section reinforced concrete beams with a span of 2.4 independent wire ropes (IWRC), as shown in Figure 7,
m, consisting of a control beam (BK), a beam without which is used as strengthening material of the
strengthening, strengthened beam type 1 (BP1) which negative moment region. Meanwhile, in the
has the strengthening of 4 wire ropes at the tension compression block, plain steel rebars are added. The
block bonded with mortar, and strengthened beam details and the section of specimen models are
type 2 (BP2), which is strengthened with 4 wire ropes presented in Table 1 and Figure 8.
at the tension block and 2 steel rebars at the
147 Yanuar Haryanto et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 81:4 (2019) 143–154
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 8 Section of specimen models: (a) control beam (BK); (b) strengthened beam type 1 (BP1); (c) strengthened
beam type 2 (BP2)
All materials assumed to have a perfect bond. As ropes were modeled using CCReinforcement
the beams were symmetrical, the modeling could be elements. Two nodes were required for this element.
conducted for half of a beam, as shown in Figure 9 for The element CCReinforcement include involves the
the BP2 specimen model. An 8-noded solid element, ability to disable the compressive response of the
CC3DnonLinCementitious2, was utilised to model the reinforcement. This is beneficial if this element is being
concrete and mortar. CC3DNonLinCementitious2 utilised to imitate the behavior of reinforcement that
element assumes a hardening regime prior to have a very low bending stiffness, just like wire rope, so
reaching the compressive strength. This material may, it can be assumed that when the reinforcement is
therefore, be used in creep calculations or when the loaded by compressive forces, buckling occurs and
material properties need to be changed during the the strength of the elements in compression is
analysis [19]. Longitudinal reinforcement and wire negligible [19]. Loading and support plates were
148 Yanuar Haryanto et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 81:4 (2019) 143–154
modeled using the 8-noded solid element elements with 180 volume elements and 11 lineal
CC3DelastIsotropic because it simulates linear elastic elements.
isotropic materials for 3D [31]. The concrete with The application of constraint conditions in the
stirrups was modeled using the 8-noded analysis consisted of a support constraint condition
CCCombinedMaterial element. This element can be and a surface constraint condition. The support
used to create a composite material consisting of constraint condition was applied in the analysis to
various components, such as for instance concrete represent support in the experimental test specimens.
with smeared reinforcement in various directions [31]. It was applied by giving the displacement value of
The materials and type of elements used in the zero in the Y direction using constraint for line. The
modeling are summarized in Table 2. value was applied to a line in the middle part of the
Al Faridi [32] conducted a convergence study and support steel plates in the model. In addition to the
concluded that the optimal number of elements in support line, the constraint condition was also applied
ATENA is 1056. Since the student version of ATENA using constraint for surface to the surface. This is
provided a maximum of only 200 elements for the 3-D because the simulation was done for only half of a
analysis, the meshing had to be done thoroughly so beam. To calculate the responses occurring in the
that the number of elements made did not exceed model, the load and flexural observation points for the
the limit of a maximum number of meshing elements. Y direction were applied. Observations were
The meshing plans for each specimen model are conducted using monitor for point with displacement
shown in Figure 10. The control beam model (BK) had output to measure the deformation while compact
a total of 197 elements with 192 volume elements and external forces output was used to measure the load.
5 lineal elements. The strengthened beam model 1 For the displacement control method, the load used is
(BP1) had a total of 161 elements with 152 volume in the form of displacement loads which is applied
elements and 9 lineal elements. Meanwhile, the using displacement for point at the rate of 1 mm.
strengthened beam model 2 (BP2) had a total of 191
(a)
(b)
149 Yanuar Haryanto et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 81:4 (2019) 143–154
(c)
Figure 10 The meshing plans for each specimen model: (a) control beam (BK); (b) strengthened beam
type 1 (BP1); (c) strengthened beam type 2 (BP2)
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION compared with the results of the experimental tests.
The load–displacement relationship resulting from the
3.1 Load-Deflection Relationship finite element analysis behaved similarly to the results
of the experimental test. The study conducted
From the results of the finite element analysis previously by Hidayat [33] proves that, in reality, a
conducted using ATENA, graphs of the load– concrete member is not uniform and does not possess
displacement relationship could be created and then homogeneous strength throughout its depth. Since
the material properties were homogeneous in all
150 Yanuar Haryanto et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 81:4 (2019) 143–154
segments of the analysis, there were consistent slope graphical comparison of the load–displacement
differences between the results of the finite element relationship for the control beam is shown in Figure 11
analysis and those of the experimental test [24]. The while the strengthened beams are shown in Figure 12.
(a)
(b)
Figure 12 Load–displacement relationship of strengthened beams: (a) strengthened beam type 1 (BP1);
(b) strengthened beam type 2 (BP2)
151 Yanuar Haryanto et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 81:4 (2019) 143–154
Results of Results of
Codes Ratio
experimental test finite element analysis
BK 9039.84 13139.05 1.45
BP1 6297.20 7282.95 1.15
BP2 7766.89 14473.12 1.86
152 Yanuar Haryanto et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 81:4 (2019) 143–154
Results of Results of
Codes Ratio
experimental test finite element analysis
BK 6.93 6.26 1.11
BP1 1.32 2.09 0.63
BP2 3.01 2.99 1.01
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 14 The cracking patterns: (a) control beam (BK); (b) strengthened beam type 1 (BP1);(c) strengthened beam
type 2 (BP2)
153 Yanuar Haryanto et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 81:4 (2019) 143–154
Finite Element Simulation. International Journal of [30] Lee, W. K. 1991. An Insight into Wire Rope Geometry.
Technology. 8(1): 134-144. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 28(4): 471-490.
[25] Haryanto, Y., Gan, B. S., Widyaningrum, A. and Maryoto, A. [31] Cervenka, V., Cervenka, J., Janda, Z. and Pryl, D. 2017.
2017. Near Surface Bamboo Reinforcement for Flexural ATENA Program Documentation Part 8; User’s Manual for
Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Jurnal ATENA-GiD Interface. Prague, Czech Republic: Cervenka
Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering). 79(6): 233-240. Consulting.
[26] Jirawattanasomkul, T., Kongwang, N., Jongvivatsakul, P. [32] Al Faridi, S. 2010. Analisis Non-linier Elemen Hingga Struktur
and Likitlersuang, S. 2018. Finite Element Modelling of Balok Beton Prategang Dua Bentangan. Mater Thesis.
flexural Behaviour of Geosynthetic Cementitious Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University.
Composite Mat (GCCM). Composites Part B. 154: 33-42. [33] Hidayat, A., Purwanto, Puspowadojo, J. and Aziz, F.A. 2015.
[27] Kupfer, H., Hilsdorf, H. K. and Rüsch, H. 1969. Behavior of The Influence of Graded Concrete Strength on Concrete
Concrete under Biaxial Stress. Journal ACI. 66(8): 656-666. Element. Procedia Engineering. 125: 1023-1029.
[28] Hordijk, D. A. 1991. Local Approach to Fatigue of Concrete. [34] Büyükkaragöz, A. 2010. Finite Element Analysis of the Beam
Doctor Dissertation, The Netherlands: Delft University of Strengthened with Prefabricated Reinforced Concrete
Technology. Plate. Scientific Research and Essays. 5(6): 533-544.
[29] Van Mier, J. G. M. 1984. Multi-axial Strain-softening of
Concrete, Part I: Fracture. Materials and Structures. 19(3):
179-190.