Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Doctor Emad
Mohammad Mari
Purpose:
Hypothesis:
I predict that the nut that contains more fat will make the water reach
the highest temperature. Since fat is the main reserve that is burnt for
energy, thus the nut with the most fat content will burn for longer,
consequently increasing the temperature of the water. The wall-nut has
more fats in it than other nuts, it consists of 18.4 grams of fat per ounce,
which is higher than the chestnut (0.4 grams per ounce), almonds (14
grams per ounce ) and the cashew (12 grams per ounce). I predict that
the walnut will have more energy content and will make the water reach
the highest water temperature, and the chestnut will have the least
energy content since it has the least amount fat and will result in the
lowest water temperature.
Variables:
Equipment/ materials:
*Almond * Walnut
*Cashew * chestnut
6.
7.
8.
9.
Procedure/Method:
Diagram:
Data:
The following table includes the water volume, the temperatures and
time of each nut.
Almond 20 20 100 74 80
Cashew 20 31 95 145 66
Walnut 20 32 100 113 68
Chestnut 20 35 100 137 65
Change in temperture
90
80
80
70
60 68 66
65
50
40 Change in temperture
30
20
10
0
Chesnutt Walnut Cashew Almond
Discussion of results:
As apprerant in the table and graph above the almond has the highest energy
content (change in temperature) followed by the walnut. The cashew has the
second lowest amount of energy content (change in temperature) and the
chestnut has the lowest amount.
Conclusion:
To conclude my hypothesis was incorrect. The walnut (the nut that
consists of the highest amount of fat) did not result in the highest
temperature rather the almond did. The reason behind this is because
almonds contain more protein and carbohydrates and other factors that
generate energy more than any of the other nuts. Energy does not
completely depend on the amount of fat yet on other factors such as but
limited to protein, Fiber, omega 3- fatty acid, vitamins, carbohydrates
and calcium. Almonds out of all the nuts have high rates of the factors
that produce energy. The almonds has a high rate of calcium, protein,
fat and relatively high amount of calories and fiber which are the
majority of the factors that generate energy. Therefore without a doubt it
produced the highest results ( highest energy content). As for the
second part of my hypothesis, which states that the chestnut will reach
the lowest temperature. That was correct, the chestnut has an
extremely low amount of fat and protein and the only factor in which it is
dominant in is vitamins and that is gone away when cooked. As
mention before in order to have a high energy content you need to have
a high amount of factors that make produce energy which chestnut
lacks of as the majority of them a relatively or extremely low thus no
balance is created between them and the average total of those factors
remains low, hence it does not produce a great energy content thus
leading it reaching the lowest temperature.
Evaluation:
All in all I would say that the experiment went well, but there are a few
possible improvements that could have been done to inure the
experiments results and make it more efficient. If I was provided with
the chance to do this experiment again I would for starters increase the
amount of controlled variables as the more controlled variables you
have the more your results will be accurate for example we could have
controlled the amount of time we will place the nut in the Bunsen
burner. Moreover I put repeat this experiment 3 times in order for it to
be a fair test and to make sure that the results are precise and are
correct. Other than that I believe that my group and I have worked well
together and have helped each other in order to be done on time
without having to rush anything leading to false results. Luckily we had
no errors and everything went according to plan, In conclusion I believe
that the experiment went fairly okay though more trials could have been
taken to achieve a greater accuracy, nonetheless we were able to
conduct a good experiment without any errors and worked together as a
team.
Risk assessment: