You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/3967748

Simulation of lightning surges on tower transmission using PSCAD/EMTDC: A


comparative study

Conference Paper · February 2002


DOI: 10.1109/SCORED.2002.1033149 · Source: IEEE Xplore

CITATIONS READS

5 1,311

5 authors, including:

Zafirah Zakaria S. M. Bashi


Open University Malaysia Al-Hadba University College
14 PUBLICATIONS   14 CITATIONS    132 PUBLICATIONS   680 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Nashiren Mailah Mohd Ridzal Othman

54 PUBLICATIONS   225 CITATIONS   
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
14 PUBLICATIONS   89 CITATIONS   
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

It is a separate project View project

FACT design and Applications View project

All content following this page was uploaded by S. M. Bashi on 21 May 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


2002 Student Conference on Research and Development Proceedings, Shah Alam, Malaysia

SCOReD2002

SIMULATION OF LIGHTNING SURGES ON TOWER TRANSMISSION


USING PSCAD/EMTDC : A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Z. Zakaria*, S.M. Bashi*, N.F. Mailah*, M.R. Othman**, H. Osman**


*
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering,Universiti Putra Malaysia
43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
**
Tenaga National Research Sdn.Bhd.
Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

ABSTRACT - This paper describes the analytical and propagation velocity inside the tower was almost at the
the experimental responses of the surges strike on the speed of light.
transmission line towers. A new method of calculating Kawai [7] reported another experimental
transmission tower surge response has been proposed. value for actual transmission towers. He used a direct
It has been found that the tower surge response method to measure tower surge impedance. The value
calculated by the proposed method has a close for this impedance at the top of the tower was
agreement with the measured tower surge response measured to be 100 ohms. His experimental results
obtained from scale model and field tests. Without the showed that the tower response to a vertical injection
use of simulation program, this topic might be difficult current is different from the response to a horizontal
to understand. PSCAD/EMTDC has been selected as current injection. Measured propagation velocity inside
the software used to generate the appropriate data the tower was 70%-80% of the speed light.
needed to graphically demonstrate this phenomenon. Ishii et al [8]and Narita et al [9] reported field
measurements of full-scale tower impedance using
1. INTRODUCTION direct method. These measurements were performed
using the techniques of inclined and horizontal current
Tower surge impedance is one of the most injections. Both of them proposed surge impedance of
important factors in analyzing lightning performances the tower based on the EMTP. Propagation velocity
on transmission lines [1]. Jordon [2] had proposed the inside the tower was assumed to be at the speed of
first theoretical formulation for tower surge light.
impedance. The aim of this study is practically based
on Neumann’s induction formula, which states that the 2. TOWER SURGE IMPEDANCE
current distribution on the transmission tower was
uniform from the bottom to the top of the tower. The surge characteristics of transmission
However the effect of return stroke current is not taken tower have been measured using 500kV Tenaga
into consideration. The tower is approximated as a Nasional Berhad’s tower (tower height 67m) as shown
vertical cylinder having a height equal to that of the in Figure 1. This measurement has not considered the
tower, and the radius equal to the mean equivalent effects of the ground wires and power lines.
radius of the tower. Propagation velocity inside of the
tower is assumed to be of the speed of light.
Beside the modeling methods, many
experimental and theoretical studies had been
performed on the surge response characteristics of
transmission towers. There are many reports on the
techniques used to estimate the tower surge
impedance. Theoretical formulation of tower surge
impedance based on the electromagnetic field theory
had been proposed by Janischewskyj [3], Wagner and
Hileman [4] and Okumura and Kijima [5], which
considered the effects of the vector potential generated
by the injection current into the tower. Propagation
velocity inside the tower was assumed to be of the
speed of light.
Breuer et al [6] had carried out actual
measurements of the surge impedance of actual
transmission towers. In his work, a reflection method
was adopted, and an impedance value of 165 ohms was
obtained at the top of the tower. The measured Fig. 1. Structure drawing of 500 kV Tower.

0-7803-7565-3/02/$17.00 ©2002 IEEE.


The calculation of average value of the tower surge From the calculation, the surge impedances
impedance has been carried out by implementing the for the tower are :-
formulas proposed by the introduction manual to
PSCAD/EMTDC and CIGRE [10]. In this calculation 1. For the lower vertical cylinder conductor using
the tower radius R has been chosen as Model (1), and formula (1) is :- Zo = 136.61 ohm.
the tower was simulated by an inverted cone as shown
in Figure 2. 2. For the upper vertical cylinder conductor using
formula (2) is :- Zo = 55.883 ohm.

3. For the horizontal upper, middle and lower cross


arm using formula (3) is:- Zo = 172.86 ohm

3. SURGE RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF


ACTUAL TOWER

3.1 Measurement Conditions


Figure 3 shows the measurement conditions
and the arrangement of measuring equipment. The
tower under measurement is the 500kV steel tower
with an overall height of 62.8m and a base width of
10.8m. The ground wires were insulated from no. 1
tower by insulators to avoid reflection at this position,
since the span between no. 2 and no. 3 tower is short.
Fig. 2. All the phase conductors were directly connected to
no. 1 and no. 4 tower to reduce the noise, which may
2.1 For A Vertical Cylindrical Conductor affect the measurement.
The theoretical value of the vertical cylinder A 50 ohm coaxial cable of 300m in length
impedance has been given in the literature [10] in a was used to inject current into no. 3 tower from a pulse
different form: - generator (PG) on the ground as seen in Figure 3. The
tower surge impedance is chosen at 115 ohms. The
i) CIGRE formula of lower vertical cylinder is given sheath of the cable was left open at the tower end,
as: - while it is connected to the earth at other end, where
the configuration is equivalent to as to set the PG on
Zo = 60 ln [cot 0.5 {tan -1 (R avg/h)} (1) the ground wire across the arm, as no external field
exists before the traveling wave within the coaxial
Where (see figure 2) : cable from the PG reaches the tower top no. 4. Thus
h = tower height (m) current injection is similar to Kawai [7] and is
Ravg = average tower radius (m) classified a direct method (no other lines for
= (r1 h2 +r2 h + r3 h1)/h measurement were installed).
r1 = radius at mid point h1 tower (m) The injected current was measured by the
r2 = radius at h2 from the mid point (m) current shunt and the voltage across the current strings
r3 = tower’s base radius (m) was measured by a 10K ohm resistive voltage divider.
These signals were converted into light signals and
ii) PSCAD/EMRDC formula for upper vertical were transmitted to waveform recording devices on the
cylinder is given as :- ground through optical wave-guides. Bundle fibers
were used for the optical wave-guides, which resulted
Zo = 132.8 log 10 (2h/d) + 45 d/h – 60 (2) in the change of sensitivity after the wave-guide was
disconnected and reconnected to the transducer.
Where: Therefore the sensitivity was calibrated before and
h = height of the tower (m) after each measurement by a calibrator incorporated in
d = diameter of the conductor (m) the optical signal transmission system and the accuracy
was maintained within 2% of error. In a measurement
2.2 For A Horizontal Cylindrical Conductor without connecting ground wires to the tower, the
The theoretical surge impedance ZO ,for the voltage between an isolated ground wire and the cross
horizontal upper, middle and lower cylinders can be arm was also measured. The frequency range of the
approximated to be :- measuring system was from DC up to 12 MHz, which
was limited by the electro-optical signal converter.
Zo = (377/2π) * ln (2h/r) (3)
3.2 Recorded Waveforms
Where: Figure 4 shows the resulted waveform when
h = height of conductor above the ground (m) the current was injected at the top point of the tower.
r = radius of conductor (m) In the case of steep front wave, a PG was sent out at a
neat rectangular waveform into a 50-ohm connecting
cable. The resulted waveform, which was measured at current line. This shows that from the experiment and
the top point of the tower, was found to be deformed theory, the setup current injection line has a great
which can be seen in Figure 4(a). Figure 4(b) shows effect on the surge response. This measured value of
various waveforms calculated for conventional and the propagation velocity along the towers is almost
new tower models shown for comparison purpose. It is 80%-90% speed of the light. The fact that the
clear that the calculated results agree accurately with propagation velocity depends on the structures such as
the measured results and the proposed model can the cross arms, horizontal elements and inclined
reproduce the effect of the direction of the injected elements are clearly shown here.

Figure 3. Setup for lightning surge response measurements

500 kV Tow er

Ea
+500

+360

+220 A
+80

-60

-200 0 2e-006 4e-006 6e-006 8e-006 1e-005


Tim e (sec)

500 kV Tow er

Eb
+350

b)
+270

+190

+110

+30

-50 0 2e-006 4e-006 6e-006 8e-006 1e-005


Ti
m e (sec)

500 kV Tow er

Ec
+500

+380

+260
c)
+140

+20

-100 0 2e-006 4e-006 6e-006 8e-006 1e-005


Tim e (sec)

Measured waveforms Calculated waveforms

Figure 4. Calculated and measured waveform


(a) Upper phase insulator voltage
(b) Middle phase insulator voltage
(c) Lower phase insulator voltage
4. CONCLUSIONS

This paper reports on the results of [4] C.F Wagner and A.R. Hileman, “A New Approach
measurements and calculations of the lightning surge to the Calculation of the Lightning Performance of
response characteristics of a 500 kV transmission Transmission Lines , III-A Simplified Method Stroke
tower. Based on the above calculation, a new to Tower,” AIEE Trans. Vol 79, 1980, pp 589-603.
multistory tower model will be developed to be used in
the multistory conductor lightning surge analysis by [5] K.Okumura and A. Kijima. “A method for
EMTDC. This analysis enables us to predict the Computing Surge Impedance of Transmission Line
waveform of each insulator voltage, which is useful in Tower by
determining the phase. Measurements of the tower Electromagnetic Field Theory,” IEE of Japan, Trans B,
surge response were carried out. It is known from the Vol 105, pp 733-740, 1985.
measurements and calculations that the actual surge
velocity in the tower is closed to the speed of light. [6] G Breuer, A.J, Schultz, R.H. Schlomann and W.S
From the comparisons between the calculated results Price, “ Field Studies of the Surge Response of a
obtained using the proposed model and the measured 345 kV Transmission Tower And Ground Wires,”
results, it is clearly shows the direction of the current. AIEE Trans., pt III vol 77, 1958, pp 1392-1396
Injection line significantly affects the surge
characteristics of the transmission tower. This fact is [7] M. Kawai, “Studies of the Surge Response on a
important in understanding the surge response of the Transmission Line Tower,” IEEE Trans, 1964 , PAS-
tower. 88, pp 30- 34.

5. REFERENCES [8] M. Ishii, T. Kawamura, T. Kouno, E. Ohsaki,K.


Murotani and T. Higuchi,” Multisory Transmission
[1] Hideki Motoyama and Hiroji Matsubara, Tower Model for Lightning Surge Analysis”, IEEE
“Analytical and Experimental Study on Surge Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 6 no. 3 , pp 1327-1335,
Response Transmission Tower,’ IEEE Trans., PWRD, 1991.
vol 15, no 2, April 2000.
[9] Narita, Tomomi,Yamada, Takeshi, Mochizki,
[2] C.A. Jordon, “Lightning Computations for Azuma, Zaima, Ishii, and Masaru ,” Observation of
Transmission Lines with Overhead Ground Wires Current Waveshapes of Lightning Strokes on
Part II, ” General Electric Review, Vol 34, pp180-185, Transmission Towers”, IEEE Transactions on Power
1994. Delivery , Vol. 15, Jan 2000, pp 429-435

[3] Janischewskyj,” Lightning Electric Characteristics [10] CIGRE Working Group 33.01, ” Guide to
of first and subsequent return Strokes to a Tall Tower”, Procedures for Estimating the Lightning Performance
Published in the Proceeding of 11th International of Transmission Lines, CIGRE Technical, Brochure
Symposium on high voltage Engineering ,Vol. 1, 467, 63, Oct. 1991.
London, Aug 23-Aug 27 1999.

View publication stats

You might also like