STATCON CASE NOTES – SET 3 papers pertaining to official acts,
transactions, or decisions, shall be
WHEN STATUTE BECOMES EFFECTIVE afforded the citizens subject to such limitation as may be provided by law. 1. TANADA v. TUVERA 2. PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK At first, the Court said that the v. VEGA petitioners have no legal standing to bring about a suit. TANADA v. TUVERA (1985) However, the petitioners maintained that since the subject concerns a PUBLIC FACTS: Petitioners file for mandamus on the RIGHT and its object is to compel the ground of due process in order to procure the performance of a PUBLIC DUTY, publication of several Presidential Decrees in the they need not show any specific interest Official Gazette. for their petition. STATCON ISSUE: Whether or not the phrase General Rule: a writ of mandamus is “unless otherwise provided” disregards the granted to a private individual only in cases requirement of publication where the same has some private or HELD (for statcon issue): The phrase “unless particular interest to be subserved, some otherwise provided,” does not disregard the right to be protected, independent of that requirement for publication. If publication was which he holds with the public at large; dispensed there would be no basis for Article 3 And it is for the public officers exclusively of the Civil Code. Other than that, non- to apply for the writ when public rights are to publication would be violative of due process be subserved (Mithchell v. Boardmen) since it deprives people of the opportunity to be notified of newly enacted laws. - However, when the question is one of public right, and the object is to Unless laws are published, there will no procure public duty, the people are basis for the rule that ignorance of the regarded as the real party in law excuses no one from compliance interest and the relator at whose therewith. (Article 2, Civil Code). instigation the proceedings are - The basis that is mentioned here is instituted need not show that he the CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE has any legal/special interest in the that the provisions of the law are result. ascertainable from the public and official repository where they are Art 2 of Civil Code: Laws shall take duly published. effect after fifteen days following the Section 6, Article IV (1973 completion of their publication in the Constitution) – right to be informed on Official Gazette, unless it is matters of public concern. otherwise provided. - However, the Court has ruled that Sec. 6 - The right of the people publication in the Official Gazette is to information on matters of public necessary in those cases where the concern shall be recognized, access to legislation does not provide for its official records and to documents and effectivity date. The date of publication is important in Publication – part of due process. It is determining the date of effectivity— a rule of law that before a person may be 15th day following its publication. bound by law, he must first be officially Publication gives the general public and specifically informed of its contents. adequate notice of the various laws In Pesigan v. Angeles: which are to regulate their actions and conduct as citizens. "publication is necessary to apprise the The very first clause of Section I of public of the contents of [penal] Commonwealth Act 638 reads: "There regulations and make the said penalties shall be published in the Official Gazette binding on the persons affected thereby. ... ." The word "shall" used therein " The cogency of this holding is imposes upon respondent officials an apparently recognized by respondent imperative duty. That duty must be officials considering the manifestation in enforced if the Constitutional right of the their comment that "the government, as a people to be informed on matters of matter of policy, refrains from public concern is to be given substance prosecuting violations of criminal laws and reality. The law itself makes a list of until the same shall have been published what should be published in the Official in the Official Gazette or in some other Gazette. Such listing, to our mind, leaves publication, even though some criminal respondents with no discretion laws provide that they shall take effect whatsoever as to what must be included immediately.” or excluded from such publication.
Publication of all presidential issuances PHILIPPINES VETERANS BANK v.
"of a public nature" or "of general VEGA applicability" is mandated by law. FACTS: The liquidation court was enjoined from further pursuing the case - Presidential decrees that provide for of the Philippine Veterans Bank due to fines, forfeitures or penalties for their the enactment of R.A 7169. Despite the violation or otherwise impose a presence of a legislative mandate, the burden or the people, such as tax and liquidation court and the respondent revenue measures, fall within this judge still proceeded with the liquidation category of the PVB and argued that the said Act became effective only on March 10, 1992 - Presidential issuances which and not on its date of publication, apply only to particular persons or February 24, 1992. class of persons such as administrative and executive STATCON ISSUE: Whether or not orders need not be published on R.A 7169 became effective on the date of the assumption that they have been its approval. circularized to all concerned parties. HELD: As a rule, laws take effect 15 days following their publication in the Officizal Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines, the discretion may be found in adjusting the legislature, however, has the authority to period. provide for exceptions under the clause unless otherwise provided. Thus, it is Without publication, there would be a clear in the case at bar that R.A 7169 denial of public knowledge of the laws became effective immediately upon its that are supposed to govern it. approval. For the sake of argument, then the same became effective on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette. WHEN REGULATION BECOMES January 2, 1992 - R.A 7169, providing EFFECTIVE for the rehabilitation of Philippine Veterans Bank was enacted. 1. People v. Que Po Lay February 24, 1992 - published in Official Gazette. March 8, 1991- Petitioners moved for the disqualification of the judge due to bias and hostility towards the same. PEOPLE v. QUE PO LAY May 1992 - Central Bank issued a FACTS: Que Po Lay was found guilty for certificate of authority allowing PVB to violating Central Bank Circular No. 20 in reopen. connection with Section 34 of R.A No. 265. He Despite the legislative mandate for was sentenced with six months imprisonment, a rehabilitation and reopening, the fine of 1000, with subsidiary imprisonment IN respondent judge continued with the CASE of insolvency and to pay the costs. On liquidation. appeal he argued that Circular No. 20 was not June 8, 1992- SC issued a TRO published on the Official Gazette prior to the act enjoining the trial court from further or omission imputed to the appellant; hence it had proceeding with the case. no force and effect. The same also contended that Petitioners argue that the passage of R.A Commonwealth Acts No. 638 and Acts 2930 both 7169, the liquidation court became require said circular to be published in the functus officio. Official Gazette.
FUNCTUS OFFICIO - refers to an STATCON ISSUE: Whether or not Circular
officer whose mandate has expired. No. 20 needs to be published before it becomes effective. The clause unless otherwise provided HELD: Yes. It needs to be published. Although refers to the date of effectivity and not the it is true that the said circular is not a statute nor requirement of publication itself, which a law but since it is issued for the purpose of the cannot be omitted. implementing the law authorizing its issuance, Circular No. 20 has the force and effect of a law. The legislature may not make any law Hence, publication is necessary. effective immediately after its approval without publication, the former’s Commonwealth Acts No. 638 and Acts 2930 – merely enumerate and make a list of what should be published in the Official Gazette. They serve as a guide for the different branches of the Government and the Bureau of Printing. SECTION 11, of the Revised Administrative Code - , in the absence of special provision, take effect at the beginning of the fifteenth day after the completion of the publication of the statute in the Official Gazette. Article 2 of the new Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386) equally provides that laws shall take effect after fifteen days following the completion of their publication in the Official Gazette, unless it is otherwise provided.
As a rule, circulars and regulations such
a Circular No. 20, which prescribes a penalty for its violation should be published before becoming effective.
- Reason: the public is bound by its
content, especially its penal provisions, a law, regulation, or circular must be first published and the people officially and specifically informed of said contents and penalties.
Circular No. 20 was issued in 1949, but
was published on November 1951; hence it is clear that the same had no legal effect until 1951. Appellant was not liable then since it was not binding on the day he failed to sell the foreign exchange in his possession.