Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Introduction
• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in ADS
• Design and Analysis on 5G Transmit Chain
➢ Analysis include:
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure Appendix
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response • Transmit Chain components
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna • Design and Simulation
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation • Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics • Phased Array Transceiver Design Example
• 0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology
• Conclusion
SBC18H3 Jazz Process
2
INT RODUCT ION
3
INT RODUCT ION
• This presentation describes design techniques, simulation, and analysis of a 5G 28 GHz phased-
array transmit chain with a 4x4 beam-steered patch antenna array.
• Starting with EM/Circuit co-simulation, the presentation will detail various results and analysis
uncovered during the design phase and show the effects of various physical design aspects on the
overall performance of the 5G transmit chain.
5
INT RODUCT ION
• This presentation describes design techniques, simulation, and analysis of a 5G 28 GHz phased-
array transmit chain with a 4x4 beam-steered patch antenna array.
• Starting with EM Circuit co-simulation, the presentation will detail various results and analysis
uncovered during the design phase and show the effects of various physical design aspects on the
overall performance of the 5G transmit chain.
• We will then discuss X-Parameters and a powerful statistical design methodology to reduce
variability and create robust 5G Circuits.
6
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC
Transceiver Components
7
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC
+
Circuit level designs; X-parameter Momentum Planar EM
models, EM models, etc. Full 3D FEM Simulation
8
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC
+ =
Circuit level designs; X-parameter Momentum Planar EM
models, EM models, etc. Full 3D FEM Simulation
Captures the excitation from the T/R
module and apply it to the Antenna(s)
+ =
Circuit level designs; X-parameter Momentum Planar EM
models, EM models, etc. Full 3D FEM Simulation
Captures the excitation from the
T/R module and apply it to the
Antenna(s)
The output from the Circuit
simulation drives/excites the
Antenna ports
10
S Y S T E M / C I R C U I T / E M C O - S I M U L AT I O N W I T H A R E A L I S T I C 5 G S O U R C E
11
S U M M ARY
Antenna Parameters
0 degrees
Circuit/EM Co-simulation
12
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N
Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics
13
E F F E C T O F F E E D I N G N E T W O R K AN D L I N E L E N G T H S
Courtesy: Dr. Gabriel Rebeiz’s RFIC Symposium Plenary talk, June 2017 14
F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H N O L I N E S O R E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S
P1
P1
P2
P2
P3 P3
P4
P4
15
REFERENCE: F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H N O L I N E S O R E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S
Feed Lines
P1
P1
P2
P2
P3 P3
P4
P4
17
F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H S H O R T AN D U N E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S
shift
5 deg
mm
shift
L1 = 3 28 deg
L2 = 5
mm
L3 = 7
L4 = 9
Phase Shifter
Phase Angle = 0°
Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics
20
E F F E C T S O F C O M P O N E N T FAI L U R E
1. Catastrophic Failure – the failure of function is total, as with diodes that conduct in both
directions, transistors without gain, or capacitors which become short-Circuit
2. Parametric Failure – the component functions in the intended manner, but outside normal
operating limits. Examples of this are passive components which have drifted outside
tolerance, perhaps altering the response curve of filters
3. Intermittent Failure – the function is correct for the majority of the time, but occasionally
becomes for a short time either a catastrophic or parametric failure. Such faults are
commonly caused by poor connections
4. Environmental Failure – the component fails to work correctly over the intended range of
environments, Circuits may malfunction at low or high temperature, or under conditions of
vibration
21
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R
Solder
joint?
22
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R
Solder
joint?
23
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R
Effect if a row of four adjacent PA’s fail All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Sidelobe Sidelobe
14.7 dB down 14.5 dB down Sidelobes are not the problem here. Loss
of gain and power is the main problem
24
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R
Effect if a row of four adjacent PA’s fail All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Sidelobe Sidelobe
14.7 dB down 14.5 dB down Sidelobes are not the problem here. Loss
of gain and power is the main problem
25
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E
#2
#11
26
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E
#2
#11
27
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E
Effect if one PA (#2) or two PA’s (2,11) failing All PA’s are ON >> Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Red (Reference) – all PA’s are on
Blue - PA #2 is off PA #2 fails >> Gain = 16.3 dB
Green - PA’s 2 &11 are off Sidelobe 14.7 dB down; Null 37 dB down
Sidelobe is
Sidelobe of user 1 could interfere with main
4.1 dB higher
beam of user 2 pointing in that direction
28
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E
Effect if one PA (#2) or two PA’s (2,11) failing All PA’s are ON >> Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Red (Reference) – all PA’s are on
Blue - PA #2 is off PA #2 fails >> Gain = 16.3 dB
Green - PA’s 2 &11 are off Sidelobe 14.7 dB down; Null 37 dB down
Sidelobe is
Sidelobe of user 1 could interfere with main
4.1 dB higher
beam of user 2 pointing in that direction
29
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E
30
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E
Effect if PA’s 2,10 failing compared with 2,11 failing All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dB
Red (Reference) – all PA’s are on Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Green - PA’s 2 &11 are off
Black – PA’s 2 & 10 are off PA’s 2,11 go out - Gain = 15.8 dB
Sidelobe 10.4 dB down; Null 25.5 dB down
32
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E
33
E X A M P L E O F E N V I R O N M E N T A L F A I L U R E : P A T E M P E R AT U R E E F F E C T ( 2 5 ° C V S . 6 0 ° C )
Temperature Effect
60°C
25°C
34
T E M P E R AT U R E E F F E C T ( P A’ S ) – ( 2 5 ° C V S . 6 0 ° C )
29.0 25°C
18.3
60°C
Mag Radiation Intensity (25 deg)
Mag Radiation Intensity (60 deg)
Iref
Simple
Current
Iout
Mirror
Imir
Rb
Qmir Qrf
Vbemir Vberf
36
C U R R E N T M I R R O R B I A S N E T W O R K F O R T E M P C O M P E N S AT I O N
Iref Vbemir Rb
Simple −
dI OUT Is
=
VT ( rf ) r ( rf )
Current e
Iout dVbe MIR VT ( rf )
Mirror
Imir
Rb
Qmir Qrf Vbe vs. Temperature
Vbemir Vberf
dVbe MIR
−1.1mV / C
dTMIR
Iref
-ve slope +ve slope
Simple
Vbemir Rb
Current dI OUT Is VT ( rf ) − r ( rf )
Mirror
Iout = e
Imir
dVbe MIR VT ( rf )
Rb
Qmir Qrf Vbe vs. Temperature
Vbemir Vberf
dVbe MIR
−1.1mV / C
dTMIR
38
C U R R E N T M I R R O R B I A S N E T W O R K F O R T E M P C O M P E N S AT I O N
Iref
OR
Vbemir Rb
Simple −
dI OUT Is
Current = e
VT ( rf ) r ( rf )
If TMIR, ↓ VbeMIR ↑ See
Graph
Iout dVbe MIR VT ( rf )
Mirror
Imir If VbeMIR ↑, IOUT ↑ Eqn.
Rb
Qmir Qrf Vbe vs. Temperature
Vbemir Vberf
dVbe MIR
If Qmir is cooler than Qrf, the
−1.1mV / C bias current Iout will increase,
dTMIR
which can increase the RF gain
40
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N
Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics
41
E F F E C T O F V A R Y I N G P A’ S A M / P M R E S P O N S E
PA X-Parameter model
Used various X-parameter models
with different AM/PM response
42
X - PAR AM E T E R S
• Protects your IP
X-parameter
Model
43
X - PAR AM E T E R S
Overlaid Results
Model (Red) vs. Circuit (Blue)
44
X - PAR AM E T E R S
Overlaid Results
Model (Red) vs. Circuit (Blue)
45
U S I N G P A’ S W I T H V A R I E D A M / P M R E S P O N S E
PA X-Parameter model
46
U S I N G P A’ S W I T H V A R I E D A M / P M R E S P O N S E
Pout
Phase
47
U S I N G P A’ S W I T H V A R I E D A M / P M R E S P O N S E
Use Design of
PA1 Experiments (DOE) PA2
Wider variation to reduce variation Smaller variation
Phase
Phase
49
R E AL D E S I G N E X AM P L E S U S I N G D O E T E C H N I Q U E
Amp
8 GHz
1) Used a standard
design technique
Amp1 Amp2
51
R E AL D E S I G N E X AM P L E S U S I N G D O E T E C H N I Q U E
Mixer
LO
12 GHz
Amp 1 Amp 2
U/C 1 U/C 2
LO
LO
Standard Design Technique DOE Based Design Technique
53
D O E H E L P S C R E AT E R O B U S T D E S I G N S W I T H S M A L L V A R I AT I O N
Use Design of
PA1 Experiments (DOE) PA2
Wider variation to reduce variation Smaller variation
Phase
Phase
54
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N
Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics
55
E F F E C T O F PA D Y N AM I C I M P E D AN C E W I T H AN T E N N A
From:
An Introduction to Phased Array Design
A Technical Note by N. Tucker
15/04/2011
56
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S
Transmit Chain
1 50 ohm resistive loads
2 (no coupling)
3
4 1 5 9 13 Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
5 Gamma 1, 2, 3,…,16 all = 50 ohms
6
7 2 6 14
10
8
9
Transmit Chain Output Power = 28.5 dBm
10 3 7 11 15
11
12
13 4 8 12 16
14
Impedance = 50 ohms
15
16
57
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S
Transmit Chain
1 Between 40 - 62 ohms resistive Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
2
Loads (no coupling) Gamma 1, 2, 3,…,16 vary 40 - 62 ohms
3
4
1 5 9 13
5
6
7
8 2 6 10 14
9
Transmit Chain Output Power
1 28.1 dBm to 28.72 dBm
0
1 3 7 11 15
1
1
2
1 Impedance = 40 - 62 ohms
3
1
4
1 4 8 12 16
5
1
6
58
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S
59
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S
Transmit Chain
1 Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
Gamma 1, 2, 3,…,16 Antenna complex loads @ 28GHz
2 Complex Loads R+jX
3 (no coupling)
4
1 5 9 13
5
6
7 2 6 10 14
8
9 3 7 11 15
10
11 Transmit Chain Output Power
4 8 12 16 28.4 dBm to 28.5 dBm
12
13
14 Real(Z) = 53 - 55 ohms
15
16
60
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S
61
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S
Transmit Chain Antenna Load - Dynamic Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
1 Impedance (with coupling). It Gamma 1, 2, 3,,16 vary with phase >> Dynamic Impedance
2 changes as we sweep Phase angle
3
4
1 5 9 13
5
6
7
8
2 6 10 14 64
PA’s with different AM/PM response Next, use 16 PA’s with different AM/PM
response to simulate the effect of the dynamic
impedance between the PA’s and the antenna.
65
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S
67
E F F E C T O F PA D Y N AM I C I M P E D AN C E W I T H AN T E N N A ( S Y S T E M V I E W )
ArrayPhase1 {ArrayPhase}
CalcMode=Auto
Theta=11 ° [mytheta]
ArraySplit1 {ArraySplit} Phi=46 ° [myphi]
InsertionLoss=1 dB SParamSource=DataSet
Mode=SubArray DatasetName=HMC543ALC4B_sparm_25C_0.0.s2p
NumRows=8 RxInOrTxOutMap=2
NumCols=8 RxOutOrTxInMap=1
Rx Po rt_1 Po rt_2
Tx Circuit_Link
Mild blind angles are observed here due to the active reflection coefficients and accurate models for amplifiers,
Phase shifters and attenuators. The simulation can further be enhanced if employed load pulled X-parameters.
Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics
70
COUPLING EFFECT S
71
COUPLING EFFECT S
Antenna 4
28 GHz
73
G O O D I S O L AT I O N / L O W L E A K A G E
Antenna 1 Antenna 2
Good isolation
29.91 dBm - 2.46 dBm
29.32 dBm - 3.06 dBm
74
B A D I S O L AT I O N / H I G H L E A K A G E
Antenna 1 Antenna 2
Bad isolation
29.91 dBm 12.54 dBm
29.32 dBm 11.95 dBm
75
SP4T PIN DIODE SWIT CH
On
Off
Off
Off
32 - 38 dB
isolation
76
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N
Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics
77
F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
Frequency Up-Conversion
Frequency Up-Conversion
80
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S
81
Courtesy: Dr. Murthy Upmaka
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S
PwrOscillator_3 {PwrOscillator}
F=9000 MHz
Pwr=7 dBm
Problem fixed!
R I
L
PwrOscillator_3 {PwrOscillator}
F=9000 MHz
Pwr=7 dBm 82
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S AN D H AR M O N I C S
Third-Order
Nonlinear Terms;
PAs
These third order non-linearities cause
Intermodulation Distortion on the
antenna pattern from the output of the PA
83
Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia, Caleb Calabrese, Charles Baylis, Robert J. Marks II - Baylor University
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S AN D H AR M O N I C S
84
Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia, Caleb Calabrese, Charles Baylis, Robert J. Marks II - Baylor University
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S AN D H AR M O N I C S
85
Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia, Caleb Calabrese, Charles Baylis, Robert J. Marks II - Baylor University
CONCLUSION
86
CONCLUSION
• See Appendix for added information • Phased Array Transceiver Design Example
• 0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology
SBC18H3 Jazz Process
87
Appendix
• Transmit Chain components
• Design and Simulation
• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation
• Phased Array Transceiver Design Example
• 0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology
SBC18H3 Jazz Process
89
S Y S T E M / C I R C U I T / E M C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G
90
28 GHZ POWER DIVIDER
Power Divider
Designed with:
TriQuint PHEMT process
91
M M - W AV E S M A L L S I G N A L A M P S
Designed with:
TriQuint PHEMT process
92
2 8 G HZ F ILT E R RE S P O NS E
28 GHz BPF
93
M M - W AV E P O W E R A M P L I F I E R
Designed with:
GCS InP_DHBT Process
Plextek RFI PA
Global Communications Semiconductors
X-Parameter model
94
F O U R B I T P H AS E S H I F T E R – 2 2 . 5 ° P H AS E I N C R E M E N T S
95
C A L C U L AT E P H A S E S H I F T E R P H A S E E R R O R
-5 +5
+5 -5
96
CIRCUIT LEVEL DESIGNS
SS_Gain = 32.75 dB
LS_Gain = 31.65 dB @ Pin = -3 dBm (Pout = 28.65 dBm)
LS_Gain = 29.44 dB @ Pin = 1 dBm (Pout = 30.44 dBm)
97
B E H AV I O R A L L E V E L D E S I G N S
SS_Gain = 40 dB
LS_Gain = 38.8 dB @ Pin = -10 dBm (Pout = 28.8 dBm)
LS_Gain = 37.2 dB @ Pin = -7 dBm (Pout = 30.2 dBm)
98
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N
4.8 mm
3.28 mm
0.84 mm
mm
0.58
1.14 mm
0.84 mm
99
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A )
100
A P P LY I N G P H A S E S H I F T T O A N T E N N A P O R T S
http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html
101
A P P LY I N G P H A S E S H I F T T O A N T E N N A P O R T S
http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html
102
A P P LY I N G P H A S E S H I F T T O A N T E N N A P O R T S
103
S W E E P I N G T H E P H AS E S H I F T E R F O R D I F F E R E N T L O O K - U P AN G L E S
104
E X AM P L E : 0 . 1 8 U M S i G e B i C M O S T E C H N O L O G Y
105
U S E J AZZ P R O C E S S S B C 1 8 H 3
Transmit Receive
LOS Link
10 Km
106
S I G E B I C M O S D O H E R T Y P O W E R AM P L I F I E R
107
T R A N S C E I V E R S I M U L AT E D R E S U L T S
-10.3 dBm -4.65 dBm 20.4 dBm 16.8 dBm -76.8 dBm -34.7 dBm 11.3 dBm
108
RECEIVER NOISE FIGURE
Gain = 60 dB
S11 = -35 dB
S22 = -27 dB
NF = 3.5 dB
109
T R A N S M I T C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R E V M
110
T R A N S M I T C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R E V M
111
R E C E I V E C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R B E R
112
R E C E I V E C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R B E R
113
T R AN S C E I V E R T R AN S M I T AN T E N N A
114
T R AN S C E I V E R R E C E I V E AN T E N N A1
115
T R AN S C E I V E R R E C E I V E AN T E N N A2
116
How to perform EM/Circuit Excitation in ADS prior to RFPro
118
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC
Step 3
Step 1
Step 2
119
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
Sweeping phase
shifter states
Select
frequency
120
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
There is a mathematical
relationship between the 4 Bit Phase-shifter 16 states Antenna incremental
Phase-shifter angle and 22.5 degrees each step look-up angle = 7.2
beam angle degrees
7.2 degrees
Beam angle
Phase-shifter angle
is 22.5 degrees
121
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
Antenna incremental
look-up angle = 7.2
degrees
14.4 degrees
122
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
43.2 degrees
123
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
50.4 degrees
124
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
125
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
- 50.4 degrees
126
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
- 21.6 degrees
127
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
- 14.4 degrees
128
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
- 7.2 degrees
129
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N
0 degrees
130
S U M M ARY
Antenna Parameters
0 degrees
Circuit/EM Co-simulation
131