You are on page 1of 131

Jack Sifri

MMIC/Module Design Flow Specialist / Keysight Technologies


AG E N D A

• Introduction
• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in ADS
• Design and Analysis on 5G Transmit Chain
➢ Analysis include:
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure Appendix
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response • Transmit Chain components
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna • Design and Simulation
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation • Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics • Phased Array Transceiver Design Example
• 0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology
• Conclusion
SBC18H3 Jazz Process

2
INT RODUCT ION

• Why mm Wave Bands for 5G?


• Propagation issues at mm-wave for mobile communication

• Phased arrays and beam steering antennas

3
INT RODUCT ION

• Why mm Wave Bands for 5G?

• Propagation issues at mm-wave for mobile communication

• Phased arrays and beam steering antennas

• This presentation describes design techniques, simulation, and analysis of a 5G 28 GHz phased-
array transmit chain with a 4x4 beam-steered patch antenna array.

4X4 patch antenna 4


INT RODUCT ION

• Why mm Wave Bands for 5G?


• Propagation issues at mm-wave for mobile communication
• Phased arrays and beam steering antennas

• Starting with EM/Circuit co-simulation, the presentation will detail various results and analysis
uncovered during the design phase and show the effects of various physical design aspects on the
overall performance of the 5G transmit chain.

5
INT RODUCT ION

• Why mm Wave Bands for 5G?


• Propagation issues at mm-wave for mobile communication

• Phased arrays and beam steering antennas

• This presentation describes design techniques, simulation, and analysis of a 5G 28 GHz phased-
array transmit chain with a 4x4 beam-steered patch antenna array.

• Starting with EM Circuit co-simulation, the presentation will detail various results and analysis
uncovered during the design phase and show the effects of various physical design aspects on the
overall performance of the 5G transmit chain.
• We will then discuss X-Parameters and a powerful statistical design methodology to reduce
variability and create robust 5G Circuits.
6
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC

Transceiver Components

Circuit level designs; X-parameter


models, EM models, etc.

7
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC

Antenna and other


Transceiver Components
physical structures

+
Circuit level designs; X-parameter Momentum Planar EM
models, EM models, etc. Full 3D FEM Simulation

8
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC

Complete EM / Circuit Simulation


Antenna and other and Analysis
Transceiver Components
physical structures

+ =
Circuit level designs; X-parameter Momentum Planar EM
models, EM models, etc. Full 3D FEM Simulation
Captures the excitation from the T/R
module and apply it to the Antenna(s)

The output from the Circuit simulation


drives/excites the Antenna ports
9
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC

Play Video Demo on


EM/Circuit Co-Simulation in ADS RFPro

Complete EM / Circuit Simulation


Antenna and other and Analysis
Transceiver Components
physical structures

+ =
Circuit level designs; X-parameter Momentum Planar EM
models, EM models, etc. Full 3D FEM Simulation
Captures the excitation from the
T/R module and apply it to the
Antenna(s)
The output from the Circuit
simulation drives/excites the
Antenna ports

10
S Y S T E M / C I R C U I T / E M C O - S I M U L AT I O N W I T H A R E A L I S T I C 5 G S O U R C E

11
S U M M ARY

Antenna Parameters

Far and Near Fields

0 degrees

Circuit/EM Co-simulation

ADS Data Display

12
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N

Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics

13
E F F E C T O F F E E D I N G N E T W O R K AN D L I N E L E N G T H S

Courtesy: Dr. Gabriel Rebeiz’s RFIC Symposium Plenary talk, June 2017 14
F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H N O L I N E S O R E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S

P1

P1
P2

P2

P3 P3

P4

P4

15
REFERENCE: F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H N O L I N E S O R E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S

Side lobe 14.33 dB down


Null 34.9 dB down
Reference
16
F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H D I F F E R E N T U N E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S

Feed Lines

P1

P1
P2

P2

P3 P3

P4

P4

17
F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H S H O R T AN D U N E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S

shift
5 deg

mm

Side lobe 8.93 dB down


Null 18.75 dB down
Reference Side lobe 14.33 dB down
Null 34.9 dB down
18
F E E D N E T W O R K W I T H L O N G E R AN D U N E Q U AL L I N E L E N G T H S

shift
L1 = 3 28 deg
L2 = 5
mm
L3 = 7
L4 = 9

Phase Shifter
Phase Angle = 0°

Side lobe 10.63 dB down


Side lobe 14.33 dB down Null 24.73 dB down
Reference Null 34.9 dB down
19
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N

Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics

20
E F F E C T S O F C O M P O N E N T FAI L U R E

At the component level, electronic failures fall into four categories:

1. Catastrophic Failure – the failure of function is total, as with diodes that conduct in both
directions, transistors without gain, or capacitors which become short-Circuit
2. Parametric Failure – the component functions in the intended manner, but outside normal
operating limits. Examples of this are passive components which have drifted outside
tolerance, perhaps altering the response curve of filters
3. Intermittent Failure – the function is correct for the majority of the time, but occasionally
becomes for a short time either a catastrophic or parametric failure. Such faults are
commonly caused by poor connections
4. Environmental Failure – the component fails to work correctly over the intended range of
environments, Circuits may malfunction at low or high temperature, or under conditions of
vibration

21
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R

Effect if a row of four adjacent PA’s fail

Solder
joint?

22
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R

Effect if a row of four adjacent PA’s fail

Solder
joint?

23
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R

Effect if a row of four adjacent PA’s fail All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down

Four PA’s go out - Gain = 16.58 dB


Sidelobe 14.7 dB down; Null 37 dB down

Sidelobe Sidelobe
14.7 dB down 14.5 dB down Sidelobes are not the problem here. Loss
of gain and power is the main problem

Lost 1/3 of the power


(W)

= 38.12 dBm = 36.36 dBm

24
E X A M P L E O F I N T E R M I T T E N T F A I L U R E AT D I V I D E R

Effect if a row of four adjacent PA’s fail All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down

Four PA’s go out - Gain = 16.58 dB


Sidelobe 14.7 dB down; Null 37 dB down

Sidelobe Sidelobe
14.7 dB down 14.5 dB down Sidelobes are not the problem here. Loss
of gain and power is the main problem

Lost 1/3 of the power


(W)

= 38.12 dBm = 36.36 dBm

25
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if either one or two PA’s failing

#2

#11

26
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if either one or two PA’s failing

#2

#11

27
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if one PA (#2) or two PA’s (2,11) failing All PA’s are ON >> Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Red (Reference) – all PA’s are on
Blue - PA #2 is off PA #2 fails >> Gain = 16.3 dB
Green - PA’s 2 &11 are off Sidelobe 14.7 dB down; Null 37 dB down

PA’s (2,11) fail >> Gain = 15.8 dB


Sidelobe 10.4 dB down; Null 25.5 dB down

Sidelobe is
Sidelobe of user 1 could interfere with main
4.1 dB higher
beam of user 2 pointing in that direction

Lost ≈ ½ the power


(W)

= 38.12 dBm = 35.98 dBm = 35.44 dBm

28
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if one PA (#2) or two PA’s (2,11) failing All PA’s are ON >> Gain = 17.5 dB
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Red (Reference) – all PA’s are on
Blue - PA #2 is off PA #2 fails >> Gain = 16.3 dB
Green - PA’s 2 &11 are off Sidelobe 14.7 dB down; Null 37 dB down

PA’s (2,11) fail >> Gain = 15.8 dB


Sidelobe 10.4 dB down; Null 25.5 dB down

Sidelobe is
Sidelobe of user 1 could interfere with main
4.1 dB higher
beam of user 2 pointing in that direction

Lost ≈ ½ the power


(W)

= 38.12 dBm = 35.98 dBm = 35.44 dBm

29
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if PA #2 and #10 fail

30
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if PA’s 2,10 failing compared with 2,11 failing All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dB
Red (Reference) – all PA’s are on Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
Green - PA’s 2 &11 are off
Black – PA’s 2 & 10 are off PA’s 2,11 go out - Gain = 15.8 dB
Sidelobe 10.4 dB down; Null 25.5 dB down

PA’s 2,10 go out - Gain = 15.9 dB


Sidelobe 9.8 dB down; Null 18.1 dB down

Sidelobe is Sidelobe of user 1 could interfere with main


4.7 dB higher beam of user 2 pointing in that direction

Lost ≈ ½ the power


(W)

= 38.12 dBm = 35.44 dBm = 35.44 dBm


31
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if PAs 2 and 10 fail User 1 – Boresight @ 0 degrees


All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dBi
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
User 1

User 2 – Boresight @ theta = - 44 degrees


User 2 PA’s 2,10 go out - Gain = 13.7 dB
Sidelobe Gain = 10.5 dBi @ 0 deg

Sidelobe of user 2 would interfere with


main beam of user 1 pointing in that
direction

32
E X A M P L E O F C O M P O N E N T C AT A S T R O P H I C F A I L U R E

Effect if PAs 2 and 10 fail User 1 – Boresight @ 0 degrees


All PA’s are ON - Gain = 17.5 dBi
Sidelobe 14.5 dB down; Null 36 dB down
User 1
User 2 – Boresight @ theta = - 44 degrees
User 2 PA’s 2,10 go out - Gain = 13.7 dB
Sidelobe Gain = 10.5 dBi @ 0 deg
User 2
sidelobe

Sidelobe of user 2 would interfere with


main beam of user 1 pointing in that direction

33
E X A M P L E O F E N V I R O N M E N T A L F A I L U R E : P A T E M P E R AT U R E E F F E C T ( 2 5 ° C V S . 6 0 ° C )

Temperature Effect
60°C

25°C

34
T E M P E R AT U R E E F F E C T ( P A’ S ) – ( 2 5 ° C V S . 6 0 ° C )

29.0 25°C

18.3

60°C
Mag Radiation Intensity (25 deg)
Mag Radiation Intensity (60 deg)

25°C 38.12 dBm W More than


1/3 of the
power is lost
60°C 36.13 dBm W
35
C U R R E N T M I R R O R B I A S N E T W O R K F O R T E M P C O M P E N S AT I O N

Active Bias Topology


(Temp Compensation)

Iref
Simple
Current
Iout
Mirror
Imir
Rb
Qmir Qrf
Vbemir Vberf

Vbemir = VRb + Vberf

36
C U R R E N T M I R R O R B I A S N E T W O R K F O R T E M P C O M P E N S AT I O N

Hold Amplifier Device Temp (Trf)


Constant; vary Tmirror: Equation has two terms
Active Bias Topology
(Temp Compensation)
dI OUT dVbe MIR dI OUT
= *
dTMIR dTMIR dVbe MIR

Iref Vbemir Rb
Simple −
dI OUT Is
=
VT ( rf ) r ( rf )
Current e
Iout dVbe MIR VT ( rf )
Mirror
Imir
Rb
Qmir Qrf Vbe vs. Temperature
Vbemir Vberf
dVbe MIR
 −1.1mV /  C
dTMIR

Vbemir = VRb + Vberf Well known characteristic


of PN junction diodes:
Diode voltage is CTAT
(complementary to absolute temperature), driven
by the saturation current Is 37
C U R R E N T M I R R O R B I A S N E T W O R K F O R T E M P C O M P E N S AT I O N

dI OUT dVbe MIR dI OUT


Active Bias Topology dTMIR
=
dTMIR
*
dVbe MIR
-ve slope
(Temp Compensation)

Iref
-ve slope +ve slope
Simple
Vbemir Rb
Current dI OUT Is VT ( rf ) − r ( rf )
Mirror
Iout = e
Imir
dVbe MIR VT ( rf )
Rb
Qmir Qrf Vbe vs. Temperature
Vbemir Vberf
dVbe MIR
 −1.1mV /  C
dTMIR

Vbemir = VRb + Vberf

38
C U R R E N T M I R R O R B I A S N E T W O R K F O R T E M P C O M P E N S AT I O N

Hold Amplifier Device Temp (Trf)


Active Bias Topology Constant; vary Tmirror: If TMIR ↑, VbeMIR ↓ See
Graph
(Temp Compensation)
dI OUT dVbe MIR dI OUT
dTMIR
=
dTMIR
*
dVbe MIR
If VbeMIR ↓, IOUT ↓ Eqn.

Iref
OR
Vbemir Rb
Simple −
dI OUT Is
Current = e
VT ( rf ) r ( rf )
If TMIR, ↓ VbeMIR ↑ See
Graph
Iout dVbe MIR VT ( rf )
Mirror
Imir If VbeMIR ↑, IOUT ↑ Eqn.
Rb
Qmir Qrf Vbe vs. Temperature
Vbemir Vberf
dVbe MIR
If Qmir is cooler than Qrf, the
 −1.1mV /  C bias current Iout will increase,
dTMIR
which can increase the RF gain

Vbemir = VRb + Vberf Well known characteristic


of PN junction diodes:
Diode voltage is CTAT
(complementary to absolute temperature), driven
by the saturation current Is 39
I N T E G R AT E D E L E C T R O T H E R M A L S I M U L AT I O N I N A D S

MMIC PA PA IC in QFN Package

40
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N

Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics

41
E F F E C T O F V A R Y I N G P A’ S A M / P M R E S P O N S E

PA X-Parameter model
Used various X-parameter models
with different AM/PM response

42
X - PAR AM E T E R S

• Much faster simulation speed and trade-


off analysis in hierarchical system design
and verification.
Circuit Topology
• Accurately captures all non-linearities

• Protects your IP

• Accurate load pull modeling capability

X-parameter
Model

43
X - PAR AM E T E R S

Overlaid Results
Model (Red) vs. Circuit (Blue)

44
X - PAR AM E T E R S

Overlaid Results
Model (Red) vs. Circuit (Blue)

45
U S I N G P A’ S W I T H V A R I E D A M / P M R E S P O N S E

Pin / Pout and Phase Response of PA

PA X-Parameter model

Circuit Sim – Red


X-Par model – Blue

46
U S I N G P A’ S W I T H V A R I E D A M / P M R E S P O N S E

Pout

Phase

47
U S I N G P A’ S W I T H V A R I E D A M / P M R E S P O N S E

Side lobe 12.8 dB down


Null 24.76 dB down
Side lobe 14.33 dB down
Reference Null 34.9 dB down
48
D O E H E L P S C R E AT E R O B U S T D E S I G N S W I T H S M A L L V A R I AT I O N

Use Design of
PA1 Experiments (DOE) PA2
Wider variation to reduce variation Smaller variation
Phase
Phase

This YouTube video shows you how to


use DOE to reduce variability and
create robust designs with high yield

49
R E AL D E S I G N E X AM P L E S U S I N G D O E T E C H N I Q U E

A real fabricated design


X-band amplifier

Amp
8 GHz

1) Used a standard
design technique

2) Used a robust Design of Experiments (DOE)


based design technique
50
R E AL D E S I G N E X AM P L E S U S I N G D O E T E C H N I Q U E

Amp1 Amp2

Standard Design Technique DOE based Design Technique

51
R E AL D E S I G N E X AM P L E S U S I N G D O E T E C H N I Q U E

Mixer

8 GHz Amp 20 GHz

LO

12 GHz

1) Used a standard 2) Used a robust Design of Experiments (DOE)


design technique based design technique (Amp and Mixer)
52
R E AL D E S I G N E X AM P L E S U S I N G D O E T E C H N I Q U E
Mixer1 Mixer2

Amp 1 Amp 2

U/C 1 U/C 2

LO

LO
Standard Design Technique DOE Based Design Technique

53
D O E H E L P S C R E AT E R O B U S T D E S I G N S W I T H S M A L L V A R I AT I O N

This YouTube video shows you how to


use DOE to reduce variability and
create robust designs with high yield

Use Design of
PA1 Experiments (DOE) PA2
Wider variation to reduce variation Smaller variation
Phase
Phase

54
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N

Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics

55
E F F E C T O F PA D Y N AM I C I M P E D AN C E W I T H AN T E N N A

“The importance of active input


impedance should not be
underestimated. Its effects can be
dramatic because it directly impacts the
amplitude and phase excitations of the
array elements and these are the very
parameters you are using to control the
array!”

From:
An Introduction to Phased Array Design
A Technical Note by N. Tucker
15/04/2011

56
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Transmit Chain
1 50 ohm resistive loads
2 (no coupling)
3
4 1 5 9 13 Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
5 Gamma 1, 2, 3,…,16 all = 50 ohms
6
7 2 6 14
10
8

9
Transmit Chain Output Power = 28.5 dBm
10 3 7 11 15
11
12
13 4 8 12 16
14
Impedance = 50 ohms
15
16

57
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Transmit Chain
1 Between 40 - 62 ohms resistive Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
2
Loads (no coupling) Gamma 1, 2, 3,…,16 vary 40 - 62 ohms

3
4
1 5 9 13
5
6
7
8 2 6 10 14

9
Transmit Chain Output Power
1 28.1 dBm to 28.72 dBm
0
1 3 7 11 15
1
1
2
1 Impedance = 40 - 62 ohms
3
1
4
1 4 8 12 16
5
1
6

58
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg


Gamma 1, 2, 3,…,16 varying complex loads

59
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Transmit Chain
1 Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
Gamma 1, 2, 3,…,16 Antenna complex loads @ 28GHz
2 Complex Loads R+jX
3 (no coupling)
4
1 5 9 13
5
6
7 2 6 10 14
8

9 3 7 11 15
10
11 Transmit Chain Output Power
4 8 12 16 28.4 dBm to 28.5 dBm
12
13
14 Real(Z) = 53 - 55 ohms
15
16

60
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Transmit Chain Antenna Load - Dynamic


1 Impedance (with coupling). It
2 changes as we sweep Phase angle
3 Now let’s use the actual antenna with its
4
1 5 9 13 EM simulated model including all couplings
5
6
7
8
2 6 10 14
9
10 3 15
7 11
11
12
13
4 8 12 16
14
15
16

61
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Transmit Chain Antenna Load - Dynamic Sweeping Phase_Shift from -60 to 60 deg
1 Impedance (with coupling). It Gamma 1, 2, 3,,16 vary with phase >> Dynamic Impedance
2 changes as we sweep Phase angle
3
4
1 5 9 13
5
6
7
8
2 6 10 14 64

Real(Z1 to Z16) ohm


10 3 15
7 11
11
12
13
4 8 12 16
14
15
16
Phase angle -60 to 60 deg
36
62
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Phase shift -60 to 60 deg


63
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Close to 1 dB variation in Power Output


64
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

PA’s with different AM/PM response Next, use 16 PA’s with different AM/PM
response to simulate the effect of the dynamic
impedance between the PA’s and the antenna.

65
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A ) W E L L M AT C H E D T O 5 0 O H M S

Close to 3.5 dB variation in Output Power


66
E F F E C T O F PA D Y N AM I C I M P E D AN C E W I T H AN T E N N A

As scan angle increases:


• Less power to main lobe (lower peak gain)
Q=0o
• Less directivity (wider beam)
• PA loading & impedance changes
Q=45o
oAffects the final beam shape
oIn extreme cases can create blind spots

• More energy goes to side lobes (“grating lobes”)

67
E F F E C T O F PA D Y N AM I C I M P E D AN C E W I T H AN T E N N A ( S Y S T E M V I E W )

ArrayPhase1 {ArrayPhase}
CalcMode=Auto
Theta=11 ° [mytheta]
ArraySplit1 {ArraySplit} Phi=46 ° [myphi]
InsertionLoss=1 dB SParamSource=DataSet
Mode=SubArray DatasetName=HMC543ALC4B_sparm_25C_0.0.s2p
NumRows=8 RxInOrTxOutMap=2
NumCols=8 RxOutOrTxInMap=1

Rx Po rt_1 Po rt_2

Tx Circuit_Link

ArrayPort1 {ArrayPort} Subnetwork1 {Circuit_Link}


RxTx=Tx DesignName=XParamAmp
Freq=2 GHz [Freq] ArrayAttn1 {ArrayAttn} ArrayAnt2 {ArrayAnt}
Window=Taylor Configuration=Uniform Rectangular Array
Phase=0 °
SideLobeLevel=-20 dB10 NumElementsX=8
MainCarrierIndex=1
NumBars=2 NumElementsY=8
SParamSource=DataSet DistanceUnit=Wavelengths
DatasetName=HMC1019ALP4E_sparameters_deembedded_0.0p0dB.s… DistanceX_in_Wavelengths=0.25
RxInOrTxOutMap=2 DistanceY_in_Wavelengths=0.25
RxOutOrTxInMap=1 ElementPatternType=Pattern File
ElementPatternFileName=D:\EMPROHOME\single_element_patter…
ActiveLoading=Active Reflection Coefficients
RxTx=Tx

1 8X8 8X8 8X8 8X8 8X8


Digital
Digital Antenna
Source Splitter Phase Amplifier
Attenuator Array
Shifter
S-parameters Multiple Multiple X-parameters Element patterns,
S-parameters S-parameters Polarization coupling,
Active impedance

Courtesy: Dr. Murthy Upmaka 68


E F F E C T O F PA D Y N AM I C I M P E D AN C E W I T H AN T E N N A ( S Y S T E M V I E W )

Mild blind angles are observed here due to the active reflection coefficients and accurate models for amplifiers,
Phase shifters and attenuators. The simulation can further be enhanced if employed load pulled X-parameters.

Courtesy: Dr. Murthy Upmaka 69


V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N

Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics

70
COUPLING EFFECT S

71
COUPLING EFFECT S

Side lobe 14.33 dB down


Side lobe 11.73 dB down
Reference Null 34.9 dB down Null 19.29 dB down
72
L E A K A G E A N D I S O L AT I O N E F F E C T S

Four Channel Switched Beam System


Antenna 1
Design for low leakage and
28 GHz
account for coupling early on in
the design cycle:
Antenna 2
28 GHz
• Make sure all power dividers
Switch
in the System have excellent
isolation
Antenna 3
• Run EM simulation to account
for proximity effects and 28 GHz
compensate for coupling

Antenna 4
28 GHz

73
G O O D I S O L AT I O N / L O W L E A K A G E

Antenna 1 Antenna 2

Good isolation
29.91 dBm - 2.46 dBm
29.32 dBm - 3.06 dBm

74
B A D I S O L AT I O N / H I G H L E A K A G E

Antenna 1 Antenna 2

Bad isolation
29.91 dBm 12.54 dBm
29.32 dBm 11.95 dBm

75
SP4T PIN DIODE SWIT CH

On
Off
Off
Off
32 - 38 dB
isolation

< - 20 dB Return Loss

76
V A R I O U S A N A LY S I S U S I N G E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N

Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics

77
F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

Effect of Non-linearities due to


Frequency Translation and Amplification

Frequency Up-Conversion

Courtesy: Dr. Murthy Upmaka 78


F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

Effect of Non-linearities due to


Frequency Translation and Amplification

Frequency Up-Conversion

Courtesy: Dr. Murthy Upmaka 79


E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S

Simulated radiation pattern of


U/C phased array system

10 GHz 8 GHz 20 GHz ….

80
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S

8 GHz intermod violates


Spectrum Emission Mask
(SEM) spec

81
Courtesy: Dr. Murthy Upmaka
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S

8 GHz intermod violates SEM


R I
L

RFAmp_1 {RFAMP} BPF_Butter_1 {BPF_BUTTER} Modify the filter


G=20 dB10 IL=0.2 dB
Mixer_1 {MIXER_BASIC} NF=3 dB10 N=7
ConvGain=-8.000009 dB Flo=9.2 GHz
LO=7 dBm Fhi=10.8 GHz

PwrOscillator_3 {PwrOscillator}
F=9000 MHz
Pwr=7 dBm

Problem fixed!

R I
L

RFAmp_1 {RFAMP} BPF_Butter_1 {BPF_BUTTER}

Use narrower filter


G=20 dB10 IL=0.2 dB
Mixer_1 {MIXER_BASIC} NF=3 dB10 N=7
ConvGain=-8.000009 dB Flo=9.5 GHz
LO=7 dBm Fhi=10.5 GHz

PwrOscillator_3 {PwrOscillator}
F=9000 MHz
Pwr=7 dBm 82
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S AN D H AR M O N I C S

Two Shared-Frequency Transmit 𝑣𝑖,𝑛 = 𝐴1 𝑛 cos 𝜔0 𝑡 − 𝑛𝛼1 + 𝐴2 𝑛 cos 𝜔0 𝑡 − 𝑛𝛼2


Signals from Same Aperture:
2 3
𝑣𝑜,𝑛 = 𝛽1 𝑣𝑖,𝑛 + 𝛽2 𝑣𝑖,𝑛 + 𝛽3 𝑣𝑖,𝑛

Third-Order
Nonlinear Terms;
PAs
These third order non-linearities cause
Intermodulation Distortion on the
antenna pattern from the output of the PA

83
Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia, Caleb Calabrese, Charles Baylis, Robert J. Marks II - Baylor University
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S AN D H AR M O N I C S

Third order non-linearities


cause Intermodulation
Distortion on the antenna
pattern from the output of
the PA

84
Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia, Caleb Calabrese, Charles Baylis, Robert J. Marks II - Baylor University
E F F E C T O F N O N - L I N E AR I T I E S AN D H AR M O N I C S

IMD3 Loadpull finds minimum IMD3 impedance to present to each PA


Element-wise impedance tuning to mitigate nonlinearities

85
Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia, Caleb Calabrese, Charles Baylis, Robert J. Marks II - Baylor University
CONCLUSION

This presentation has demonstrated the importance of:


• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in 5G design and simulation
• Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics

• See Appendix for added information

86
CONCLUSION

This presentation has demonstrated the importance of:


• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in 5G design and simulation
• Analysis
1. Effect of the feed network and line lengths
2. Effect of component failure
3. Effect of varying PA’s AM/PM response Appendix
4. Effect of PA dynamic impedance with antenna • Transmit Chain components
5. Effect of coupling, cross talk, and isolation • Design and Simulation
6. Effect of non-linearities and harmonics • Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation

• See Appendix for added information • Phased Array Transceiver Design Example
• 0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology
SBC18H3 Jazz Process

87
Appendix
• Transmit Chain components
• Design and Simulation
• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation
• Phased Array Transceiver Design Example
• 0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology
SBC18H3 Jazz Process

89
S Y S T E M / C I R C U I T / E M C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G

Plextek RFI Buffer Amp Phase Shifter 4X4 Array .5 Lambda


Power Divider 28 GHz BPF Plextek RFI PA Patch Antenna

90
28 GHZ POWER DIVIDER

Power Divider

Designed with:
TriQuint PHEMT process

91
M M - W AV E S M A L L S I G N A L A M P S

mm-Wave small signal Amp

Designed with:
TriQuint PHEMT process
92
2 8 G HZ F ILT E R RE S P O NS E

28 GHz BPF

93
M M - W AV E P O W E R A M P L I F I E R

Designed with:
GCS InP_DHBT Process
Plextek RFI PA
Global Communications Semiconductors
X-Parameter model

94
F O U R B I T P H AS E S H I F T E R – 2 2 . 5 ° P H AS E I N C R E M E N T S

45 deg 180 deg


Designed with:
22.5 deg 90 deg TriQuint PHEMT
process

95
C A L C U L AT E P H A S E S H I F T E R P H A S E E R R O R

22.5 deg 22.5 deg

-5 +5

+5 -5

When Circuit 1 is “ON”, Circuit 2 is “OFF”


When Circuit 1 is “OFF”, Circuit 2 is “ON”

96
CIRCUIT LEVEL DESIGNS

Circuit level designs

P -1dB = 28.65 dBm


@ Pin -3 dBm

SS_Gain = 32.75 dB
LS_Gain = 31.65 dB @ Pin = -3 dBm (Pout = 28.65 dBm)
LS_Gain = 29.44 dB @ Pin = 1 dBm (Pout = 30.44 dBm)

97
B E H AV I O R A L L E V E L D E S I G N S

Behavioral level designs

P -1dB = 28.8 dBm


@ Pin -10 dBm

SS_Gain = 40 dB
LS_Gain = 38.8 dB @ Pin = -10 dBm (Pout = 28.8 dBm)
LS_Gain = 37.2 dB @ Pin = -7 dBm (Pout = 30.2 dBm)

98
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N

4.8 mm

3.28 mm
0.84 mm

mm
0.58
1.14 mm

H=.794 mm Er=2.2 TanD=.0009

0.84 mm

99
P AT C H A N T E N N A D E S I G N ( 4 X 4 A R R AY – ½ L A M B D A )

100
A P P LY I N G P H A S E S H I F T T O A N T E N N A P O R T S

http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html

The main beam always points in the


direction of the increasing phase
shift.
Well, if the signal to be radiated is
delivered through an electronic
phase shifter giving a continuous
phase shift now, the beam direction
will be electronically adjustable.
However, this cannot be extended
unlimitedly. The highest value,
which can be achieved for the
Field of View (FOV) of a phased
array antenna, is 120° (60° left and
60° right). With the sine theorem the
necessary phase moving can be
calculated.

101
A P P LY I N G P H A S E S H I F T T O A N T E N N A P O R T S

http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html

The phase shift Δφ between two


successive elements is constant
and is called phase-increment.

102
A P P LY I N G P H A S E S H I F T T O A N T E N N A P O R T S

Phase Shift Antenna look-up angle


61.5 degrees 20 degrees
31.2 10
22.5 7.2

103
S W E E P I N G T H E P H AS E S H I F T E R F O R D I F F E R E N T L O O K - U P AN G L E S

Phase Shift Antenna look-up angle


61.5 degrees 20 degrees
31.2 10
22.5 7.2

104
E X AM P L E : 0 . 1 8 U M S i G e B i C M O S T E C H N O L O G Y

5G 28-GHz Phased Array


Transceiver

105
U S E J AZZ P R O C E S S S B C 1 8 H 3

Transmit Receive

LOS Link
10 Km

106
S I G E B I C M O S D O H E R T Y P O W E R AM P L I F I E R

PA Output Power and Phase


Doherty PA

Small Signal S-Parameters

107
T R A N S C E I V E R S I M U L AT E D R E S U L T S

-10.3 dBm -4.65 dBm 20.4 dBm 16.8 dBm -76.8 dBm -34.7 dBm 11.3 dBm

Pin PA_in PA_out P_Antenna LNA_in LNA_out P_received

P_Antenna 16.8 dBm


Antenna gain14 dB 108 dB Loss in the LOS Link
LNA_in -77 dBm

108
RECEIVER NOISE FIGURE

Gain = 60 dB
S11 = -35 dB
S22 = -27 dB
NF = 3.5 dB

109
T R A N S M I T C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R E V M

110
T R A N S M I T C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R E V M

111
R E C E I V E C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R B E R

112
R E C E I V E C H A I N V E R I F I C AT I O N T E S T B E N C H F O R B E R

113
T R AN S C E I V E R T R AN S M I T AN T E N N A

114
T R AN S C E I V E R R E C E I V E AN T E N N A1

115
T R AN S C E I V E R R E C E I V E AN T E N N A2

116
How to perform EM/Circuit Excitation in ADS prior to RFPro

118
H B , S - PAR , E N V E L O P E , T R AN , D C , AC
Step 3
Step 1

Step 2

119
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

Sweeping phase
shifter states

Select
frequency
120
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

There is a mathematical
relationship between the 4 Bit Phase-shifter 16 states Antenna incremental
Phase-shifter angle and 22.5 degrees each step look-up angle = 7.2
beam angle degrees

7.2 degrees
Beam angle
Phase-shifter angle
is 22.5 degrees

Beam angle is 7.2


degrees

121
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

Antenna incremental
look-up angle = 7.2
degrees

14.4 degrees

122
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

43.2 degrees

123
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

50.4 degrees

124
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

The highest value, which


can be achieved for the
Field of View (FOV) of a
phased array antenna, is
120° (60° left and 60° right). 57.6 degrees
-57.6 degrees

125
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

- 50.4 degrees

126
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

- 21.6 degrees

127
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

- 14.4 degrees

128
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

- 7.2 degrees

129
E M / C I R C U I T C O - S I M U L AT I O N A N D B E A M S T E E R I N G : F A R F I E L D V I S U A L I Z AT I O N

0 degrees

130
S U M M ARY

Antenna Parameters

Far and Near Fields

0 degrees

Circuit/EM Co-simulation

ADS Data Display

131

You might also like